Good morning, and welcome to the RE/MAX Holdings Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2015 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. My name is Steve and I will be facilitating the audio portion of today's call. At this time I would like to turn the call over to Peter Crowe, Vice President of Investor Relations. Mr. Crowe?

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone and welcome to Re/Max’s fourth quarter and full year 2015 earnings conference call. Joining me today are our Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder, Dave Liniger and our Co-Chief financial officers, Karri Callahan and Dave Metzger. Please visit the Investor Relations page of remax.com for all earnings related materials and to access the live webcast and the replay of the today’s call. If you are participating through the webcast, please note that you will need to advance the slides as we move through the presentation. Turning to Slide 2, I would like to remind everyone that on today’s call, our prepared remarks and answers to your questions may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements address matters that are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed today. Examples of forward-looking statements may include those related to agent count, revenue, operating expenses, financial guidance, housing market conditions as well as non-GAAP financial measures. As a reminder, forward-looking statements represent management’s current estimates. Re/Max assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements in the future. We encourage listeners to review the more detailed discussions related to these forward-looking statements contained in our filings with the SEC and the definitions and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures contained in the fourth quarter earnings press release, which is available on our website. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Re/Max CEO, Dave Liniger. Dave?

Thank you, Pete and thanks to everyone for joining our call today. Turning to Slide 3, we continued our positive momentum in 2015 by focusing on the three core pillars that create shareholder value; organic growth, acquisition and investment catalysts and return of capital to the shareholders. In 2015 we executed on each pillar and delivered strong results. In order to drive organic growth last year we focused on helping our franchisees recruit quality agents and emphasize franchise sales. We will do the same in the future to drive agent growth. In 2015, we grew our agent count by 7% over year-end 2014 and we sold 946 Re/Max franchises across the globe, an increase of 23.5% over 2014. Our focus on organic growth fuelled our stable recurring revenue streams and coupled with our disciplined approach to expense management delivered margin expansion of 270 basis points over 2014 and generated $71 million in free cash flow. Our investment catalyst drove further growth in 2015 and will continue tohelp drive shareholder return going forward. We continue to be very committed to reinvesting in the business and our top priorities are training and technology. Our Momentum broker and agent development program has seen strong adoption with over 50% of the company owned offices having participated. In total, over 1,600 brokers in the United States and Canada have taken the program since its launch in October of 2014. Recruiting and developing quality agents is a core aspect of Momentum and we believe the program has shifted the mindset of many of our brokers from expense management to profitable and sustainable growth of their businesses. On the technology front, we will be rolling out a new version of Re/Max.com midyear. We currently have the most visited website among real estate franchises and we are continually…

Thanks Dave. Turning to Slide 7, you'll find a breakdown of our revenue streams. Overall 2015 revenue increased 3.4% or $5.9 million compared to 2014. Revenue would have increased 5.4% year-over-year after adjusting for the sale of six company-owned brokerages in April 2015 and the sale and subsequent conversion of the Caribbean and Central America region to an independent region on December 31, 2014. Revenue from broker fees, and franchise sales and other franchise revenue drove the year-over-year increase due to strong agent growth in the US and Canada, increased home sale volume, strong franchise sales in the US and higher income associated with our agent and broker events. The strength of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar and the euro adversely affected 2015 revenue by approximately $4.1 million on a constant currency basis. Revenue from continuing franchise fees increased by $1 million or 1.4% compared to the prior year, due to increased agent count and continuing franchise fee revenue recognized from the six brokerage offices we sold in April 2015, which were previously reported in brokerage revenue. These increases were partially offset by a lower aggregate fee per agent in the company-owned regions due to fee waivers associated with the Momentum program, the December 31, 2014 sale and subsequent conversion of the Caribbean and Central America regions to independent regions. As Dave mentioned, we have seen positive results from the Momentum program and our brokerage and agents continue to adopt the program. As we discussed on the third-quarter earnings call, we will be extending the fee waiver incentives associated with the program in 2016 into company-owned regions. We want our brokers to learn, implement and master the program, so they have the knowledge and tools to grow their offices, develop their agents and increase their profitability. Revenue from…

Thanks Dave. Moving to Slide 10, the graph on the left shows our adjusted EBITDA increased $7.6 million or 9.1% to $91.4 million for the full year 2015, mainly due to an increase of $5.9 million in revenue as well as lower selling, operating and administrative expenses. As a result of the strength of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar and the Euro, operating income was negatively impacted by approximately $3.7 million in 2015 compared to $1.4 million in 2014. Looking at the graph on the right, adjusted EBITDA margin was 51.7% for the full year 2015, up 270 basis points from the prior-year. Our mark-to-market exposure and the increased strength of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar and the euro had a negative impact of approximately $5.3 million or 179 basis points on our adjusted EBITDA margin for the full year 2015 on a constant currency basis. Turning to Slide 11, the graph on the left shows net income of $51.4 million for the full year 2015, an increase of 16.8% over the prior year. The increase was primarily driven by a $5.9 million increase in revenue and a gain of $3.4 million related to the sale of 18 company-owned brokerages to existing Re/Max franchisees in 2015. These items were partially offset by an increase in foreign currency transaction losses of $313,000 when compared to the full year 2014, and increase in interest expense of $1.1 million and a $2.1 million increase in the provision for income taxes as the result of higher income before tax. Our GAAP effective tax rate increased slightly to approximately 19% during 2015. Based on adjusted net income, we reported adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share of $1.65 and $1.64 respectively for the full year 2015 compared to $1.54 and $1.51 respectively for the full year 2014. FX negatively impacted full year 2015 adjusted basic and diluted EPS by approximately $0.11. Moving to Slide 12, our cash position as of December 31, 2015 was $110.2 million, up $3 million from December 31, 2014. In 2015, we generated approximately $75 million of cash from operations, which allowed us to return approximately $60 million in dividends, reinvest in the business and still grow our cash balance. Our board recognizes the strength of our business and as a result approved a 20% increase to our quarterly dividend, which will now be $0.15 a share. Including this increase, we have increased our quarterly dividend by 140% over the past two years. Now, I'll turn it back to Dave Liniger for comments on the housing market.

Thanks Karri. Turning to Slide 13, existing home sales numbers for 2015 of $5.25 million make it the best year for existing home sales since 2007. The graph on the top left of Slide 13 shows a steadily improving housing market with normal seasonality. Looking at the other graphs, 2016 annual existing home sales are estimated to increase 1.7% while home prices are expected to increase by 3.4% over 2015 according to the National Association of Realtors. New home starts are estimated to increase by 18% in 2016 according to the National Association of Homebuilders. These 2016 estimates along with what we see in our business point to a gradual growth of the housing market. A balance of economic drivers and constraints are behind the gradual expansion of the housing market. The drivers include job growth, moderate wage growth, household formations, new home construction, increased availability of credit and the low interest rate environment. Overall we saw solid jobs numbers in 2015, which has brought unemployment down to the lowest level in eight years. We also saw wages pick up slightly in 2015 and continued jobs growth should lead to further wage growth in 2016. If this occurs we should see an increase in household formations which ultimately brings more people into the market to purchase a home. Mortgage lenders expanded access to credit in 2015 and say they will continue to do the same in 2016. Positive consumer sentiment coupled with low rates, availability of credit and increased new home construction bodes well for the housing market. As for constraints, we believe the inventory and affordability will be the governors on the housing market. Inventory of existing homes continues to be tight and builders while increasing their output have years to go before they make up for the lack of building during the downturn. Affordability pressures may come from multiple fronts, including home prices rising faster than wages and inventory shortages driving up prices. Interest rates, while still at historic lows, may add pressure if raised further this year or in the future. Overall the 2016 forecast point to a continued gradual expansion of the housing market. Now I'll turn it turn it over to Karri to walk through our financial outlook.

Thanks Dave. On Slide 14, I would like to share our outlook for the first quarter and for the full-year 2016. Our 2016 outlook reflects the impact of the strengthening US dollar against the Canadian dollar and the euro as well as the sale of the remaining company-owned brokerages. In 2015, the company generated 12% of its revenue in Canada and realized an average exchange rate of $0.78 US for every Canadian dollar. Our 2016 outlook reflects an annualized estimated exchange-rate of $0.70 US for every Canadian dollar. For the first quarter of 2016, agent count is estimated to increase by 5.5% to 6% over first quarter 2015. Revenue is estimated to decrease by 2% to 3% from first quarter 2015. Our Q1 revenue outlook reflects a decrease of $3.4 million in revenue due to the sale of the 21 brokerage offices. After adjusting for the brokerage sales, revenue would have increased by an estimated 4% to 5% over Q1 2015. The remaining brokerages were sold as of January 20th of this year. So Q1 will be the last quarter we report brokerage revenue. We estimate FX will negatively impact Q1 revenue by $500,000 to $750,000 and we estimate franchise sales and other franchise revenue will decline due to lower estimated international franchise sales revenue and fewer domestic franchise sales after a strong year in 2015. Selling, operating and administrative expenses are estimated to be 56% to 57% of first quarter 2016 revenue. As a reminder, it is normal for us to see higher expenses as a percent of revenue in Q1 due to the expense associated with our annual broker and agent convention in March and seasonality of revenue. Adjusted EBITDA margin is estimated to be in the 45% to 46% range. We estimate FX will negatively impact Q1…

Turning to Slide 15, our recruiting and development efforts delivered our best agent gain since 2005. The steadily improving housing market and the stability of our franchise model, coupled with agent growth, franchise sales and acquisitions continues to fuel the growth of the company. Our goal is to help our brokers recruit quality agents and develop those agents into the most productive in the industry. With that, operator, let's open it up for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Vikram Malhotra with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Thank you. Dave, first of all, Dave Metzger, it was good and has been great working with you and congratulations on the next stage of your career.

Thanks, Vikram.

I wanted to just follow-up on the New York acquisition. So, if I'm correct, would the value suggest a multiple of around eight, five, or nine, EBITDA?

Yes, that's correct.

And so, given the penetration, is fairly low. Kind of what's built into your guidance and maybe just plans over the next few years in terms of how you can move the penetration up?

Well, we'll be putting a team on the ground there. First thing to do is to obviously get a ReMax person in there one of our original development people in there and to talk to the brokers and the agents. Then you will be looking at selling franchises, and I think they sold two over the last couple of years. So, put a franchise sales person in there. And then really making sure we get the momentum programmed in there. So, I think there's some tremendous upside to the New York region. It'll take a little bit of time, but keep in mind their peak they had over 2100 agents. So, obviously we're going to be trying to drive the growth of that business and drive the topline, which will, we bring that multiple down over time.

Sir, in your guidance, are you assuming for this year that the penetration remains relatively flat, because I'm assuming the New York base would grow as well, the overall New York base?

That's correct, Vikram. Currently, we're expecting relatively flat agent count. And uptake to revenue in the $1 million to $1.5 million range. But we're really excited about the growth opportunity as Dave Liniger mentioned right now, we have under 2% of the agents from in our perspective. If we just double that, we'd end up at about 3.5%, which would be additional revenue over time of about 2 million.

And then just maybe stepping back as I read across maybe to other discussions and conversations with other owners. If I'm not wrong, I believe you've been sort of trying to get the New York region for a while. Can you maybe describe how this came about?

This is Dave Liniger, Vikram. As you know I have a personal relationship friendship with all the -- and then regional owners going back 30 to 40 years. So, that has continued to be a topic of discussion. We had an opportunity to go up to Quebec. Peter Tetley was the owner and visit with him for a couple of days in the fall. Started putting a proposal together and then over a period of time managed to get this close.

Okay. And then just last one from me on the dividend increase. So, is the plan going forward to maybe make ongoing increases and or do this with a combination of a special dividend?

This is Dave Metzger. Vikram, at every board meeting that the board sits down, and we talk about the entire capital allocation process. And talking about reinvesting the business, independent region acquisitions, and of course returning capital to the shareholders. We do at every board meeting. We assess whether it's appropriate to increase the area of dividend and if it's appropriate, to increase, to have a special dividend. As we talked about in the past, it's a really long-term discipline approach to return a capital in our capital allocation.

So, I guess, depending on what you're seeing, how they're in terms of either acquisitions or business opportunity that it could be either or some combination?

Absolutely.

Okay. Thank you, guys.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ryan McKeveny with Zelman & Associates. Your line is open.

Thank you, and congratulations on the good year. First question, on the franchise sales side of things. I think if I heard you're correctly, you're expecting 2016 to be slightly lower than what you achieved in 2015, which appeared to be a very good year on the franchise sale side. So, with that in mind, I'm just wondering if you could talk through what you are seeing on the ground in terms of franchise sales. And similarly, I think you alluded to the sum, but within the New York region, I guess the opportunity there to expand the franchise sales I think you said they had done only two franchise sales in the last couple of years. So, what's kind of the opportunity there within the state and geographically is there a difference between New York State and your views of kind of expanding within the New York City area. Thank you.

This is Dave Liniger. Obviously we are a marketing company. And so, when you look at the incredible year we had selling franchises, we can't maintain that pace every single year. We need to be about at the normal route of about 700 to 800 franchise sales. Often we'll sell very large number of franchises in a particular region, but we need to let them get open, established, and recruiting, before we put in additional franchises in the area. So, we’re thinking we'll have a little bit of a dip this year and then go back hard again. As far as New York goes it will take us just a little bit of time to gear up New York as the registration state and we are filing our franchise disclosure documents with them but we already have a marketing plan that's in place. We have a marketing team and a sales center that's getting ready to move forward when we are designated legal to do so. And so, we're going to be very aggressive with it probably last half of the year. I would say we're going to make six to 10 franchise sales. They'll be made while we have the interest in them, but we will work in both areas. We'll work both in the major metropolitan area, but throughout the state also. So, it will come as it comes. We are pretty successful with our franchise sales campaign. And so, New York is not unique, it's just been underdeveloped and we are really excited about the opportunity, especially since we have such great market penetration and New Jersey and Philadelphia and New England, this gives us a great opportunity to fill out the last part.

Great, thanks. That's very helpful. And then just second question, when we think about the EBITDA margin of the business, I know I think in the past you just kind of mentioned that it's a business that's going to operate and call it the low 50% margin range and looking at the forward guidance I guess on the revised on the revenue base that's impacted by headwinds, it's seems that range is the 51.5 to 53, is kind of in that low 50% range. So, longer term, as we look out even beyond '16. Is that just the nature of the business where there is going to be costs that rise whether its technology related or other things that kind of limit the EBITDA margin from seeing significantly more expansion? Just any thoughts around that would be helpful. Thank you.

This is Metzger. I do think there is some opportunity for some margin pickup, but keep in mind that we have committed to reinvest in the business, both when our IT project sides as well as we invest in our people. We need good people, this is a high touch business. So, overtime there is a possibly some pickup in margin.

Yeah. Another thing that I would say is we're really focused on growing our dollar EBITDA. We, you know, 80% to 85% of our EBITDA to free cash flow which is driving our shareholder value. And so, we’re focused on that as well. There is a little bit of upside with respect to New York and just the timing of the growth in that region as well as franchise sales opportunity for a better one.

And then, just the last thing I would add in is keep in mind that from '14 to '15 we did get some margin pickups despite all the things we've been doing. I mean, we has some continued reinvestment in the businesses. Still we’re going to maintain that low 50% 52% margin range. So, we're able to do a lot in that, maybe we'll see some pickup like here indicate, some of those other things.

Okay. Thanks very much, good luck.

Our next question comes from the line of David Ridley-Lane from Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Your line is open.

Sure. I just, I first wanted to add my thanks to Dave Metzger. He's been a real straight shooter and I wish you all the best. In terms of question, just as a modeling point, was there any unusual factors to be aware of in the free cash flow in 2016 or 2015 rather, as I noticed the step-up in the accounts receivable balance in the fourth quarter. I'm wondering if that's just timing and could reverse maybe in the first quarter of '16?

Yeah. That is primarily related to timing. There are a couple of one-time expense charges that hit in the fourth quarter that we don't expect to recur. About a $1 million related to cost incurred in conjunction with the secondary offering, as well as $2.7 million charge in conjunction with just the resolution of a litigation matter. So, that's negatively impacting our free cash flow for purposes of 2015 and won't recur going forward.

Okay, got it. And then another amount of quick following question on the brokerage revenue line that you'll have in the first quarter. Is that about $700,000, if I got my math right?

No. So, in conjunction with the brokerage operations, we’ve actually sold all 21 offices as of January 20 as of 2016. So, it's about a $3.5 million reduction to revenue in Q1 of '16, compared to the prior year.

. :

Well, I don't see the inventory going up much at all. There is just a hesitancy on the part of a lot of people who have regained their equity or have very positive equity that ordinarily as home donors are sitting out there with six months inventory, they don't hesitate to put a resale property on the market. Because when it sells quickly they can move into something that's already built and unfortunately we don't have that. So, people are very reluctant to sell before they could actually find something else to move up to. I think which you're going to see is, last year was the best year we've had in 10 years, continuing to be a very slow and steady recovery. Most of the economists six months ago were thinking we grew up about 5% in transaction side this year. Almost all of them have dropped that back now, they're thinking it's going to be 1% to 1.5% to 2%. The truth of the matter is, is there is plenty of market there. It's just up to an individual company and their sales force to take more than their fair share.

Got it. Thank you, very much.

Thanks, David.

Your next question comes from the line of John Campbell with Stephens. Your line is open.

Hey, guys. Congrats on a great quarter, and Dave, contrast on the great run at ReMax and we wish you well when you move back to the East coast.

Great. Thank you, very much.

Sure. So, your guidance call, I mean, it looks like a little bit faster agent growth, just in 1Q versus the full year. How should we think about the phasing of growth total year, and then maybe if you guys can give us little bit more detail or your thoughts around just the regional movements. Are you guys kind of expecting that same general movement by international basically our base in Canada kind of up modestly, and then U.S. kind of mid single-digits?

Yes. We place so many offices and so many regions in our global footprint that they are going to grow percentage wise much more rapidly than the United States will, probably 8% or greater this year. Unfortunately, our revenue per ageing is much lower worldwide. If you look at Canada, Canadian market is probably going to stay reasonably flat for our sales associate growth. Actually we were a bit surprised last year that we grew by 600 and some agents, because our saturation is so great. They obviously have some oil problems in Alberta and we've seen some price declines in Alberta upwards of 20% from the highs in '14. But we're not seeing much impact on the agents. Vancouver is still very strong. Toronto is strong. All we can say is we think it's just going to be basically a very flat year. In the United States, we seem to be able to organically grow somewhere around 4.5% to 5%. And I think that we can give guidance, so that's probably where we'll be this year. So, all-in-all it's going to be another good year compared to the last 10 years. It just means we have to keep doing what we do.

Got it, that's helpful. Thanks for that color. I know you guys have talked about this at length at times but just curious, what are your thoughts or how do you plan on getting the international agent revenue per agent up?

Yeah. That will be a long term process. If you look at the difference in currencies and you look at the difference in business methods throughout the rest of the world, there in most countries they are not nearly as sophisticated as say United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand and so on. But over a long-term, it would definitely have a big impact, but over the short-term, our fees per agent are so much greater in the U.S. and Canada, that's where our financial growth will come from. It is important to note that we get a great deal of foreign investors buying in the United States. It's been a big stimulus for the last five or six years, probably slowing down just a little bit because of the strength of the dollar. But in my travels worldwide, it's pretty obvious that the world is very unsettled right now. Europeans are wondering what's going to happen in their country. They'd like a safe haven. If you go to Brazil and Argentina; very similar thoughts. And so, I think you'll still see a slight quality and safety and the United States and Canada are those sources people want to come to. So, we'll continue to use international as a spring board. It will continue to help us over long-term, but over short-term it just is not going to have a huge financial impact.

Got it, that makes sense. And then Dave, just back to the market, did you guys see an impact from during the quarter and then maybe what you're having from your team as far as the recovery or normalization of the closing cycle?

Yeah. We didn't see much of an impact to us at the headquarters, financially. Many of our agents and brokers saw a lot of their closings get delayed by anywhere from a week to four weeks. It didn't mean the closings didn't happen, it was just the uncertainty of the paperwork and the government overview. And so, I think we're through that cycle, but I don't think it had a real significant impact on anything.

Okay, great. Thanks guys.

Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Anthony Paolone with JP Morgan. Your line is open.

Thanks. And also I'll got the well wishes to you Dave Metzger. It's been a real pleasure.

Thanks, Tony. And great working with you as well.

First question on the OpEx. Now that the own brokerages are gone. I am presuming that the bulk of the cost issues that were like in personnel. Can you maybe help us with just the run rate going forward on some of the OpEx line? I was sort of guessing personnel becomes more of a fixed cost going forward now without the broker stuff in there.

Yeah. The primary line items from a brokerage expense perspective are personnel. You know about of the total $11 million of brokerage, is about $5 million, and they also had some significant rent expenses as well about $3.5 million. So, those are the primary headers or the reduction of brokerage expense of an $11 million. If you look at kind of the run rate of future selling operating administrative expenses, we are really committed to reinvesting in the business to grow the business going forward. So, we're looking at 47% to 49% of revenue as the forward looking run rate.

Okay. You said on the personnel side, the $11 million come out like compared to [indiscernible] 43.74 million of personnel cost in 2015.

Yeah. Of about 5 million will come out on the personnel line item.

Okay.

And then on the rent expense of about $12 million, consolidated about $3.5 million, will come out.

Okay, got it. Thank you. And then I think in the prepared comments, you mentioned momentum in times to continue to push this option of that. How much of this system is using momentum like how much is left for folks to adopt there?

There is actually quite a bit. When we implemented momentum first, the company operated regions embraced it. As matter of fact by now, about 50% of our offices in the company operated regions are already on the process and are continuing to make it work. As we succeeded with it so well, many of the independent regions have picked it up plus a few foreign countries have also picked it up. So, it's not a flavor of the day, it is a long-term five year project or longer. And so, we continue to emphasize it at our quarterly regional franchise meetings at our annual conventions and we continue to upgrade the material and the information. So, it will help us, obviously we're having good years in recruiting. And we don't just recruit anyone we aren't a company where we can hire part timers and so on. And so, we had to put our emphasis on high quality and momentum. It certainly helped us with that.

Okay, thanks. And then just lastly, your franchise sales were very strong and your agent count growth came in better than what you thought at the outside of '15. How much of growth in agents comes from selling more franchises versus probably like the same store for lack of a better term?

You know on an annual basis, it's about 25% to 28% of the franchises sold in 2015. Agent growth came from most sales, many of those still have not opened. It takes often four to six months to open one. If you look at a two year running average, it's over 50% of our agent growth comes from the franchises sold in that two year period.

And so in a typical selling franchise, is it you typically see a franchise as you sign up and then start to go out and recruit or is it just the franchisee as it's moving an existing business over?

No. The way that ReMax works is very different than our franchise competitors. Because the agents have to pay the broker to work for them. The agent experience has to be fairly high. So, we don't do very many conversions of existing offices because about 80% of the agents in the United States are not qualified to work for us. And it's very tough on a small broker with 20 or 30 agents to buy and convert to us and then fire 80% of the agents the first day and start over. So, most of our offices have been start-ups competing managers from our competition or top producers that want to start their own. And so, our start-up is fairly slow. They come to training, they start leasing space. It takes from anywhere from three to six months to get their doors open and during that three to six months period they start to do their recruiting.

Okay. So, then is it fair to say like after strong years of franchise sales, it kind of give you some backlog of growth in agents because those folks will start getting up and running and how to think about it?

That is right. Yes, that's correct.

Okay. Thank you, guys.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. Mr. Liniger, I turn the call back to you.

Thank you, operator. And thank you all for joining us on the call today.

And this concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.