Good day ladies and gentlemen and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Regional Management Corporation Second Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode to prevent background noise. [Operator Instructions] We will have a question-and-answer session later and the instructions will be given at that time. Now, I would like to turn the call to Mr. Garrett Edson, Senior Vice president of ICR.

Thank you, Carmen, and good afternoon. By now, everyone should have access to our earnings announcement and slide presentation, which was released prior to this call and which may also be found on our website at regionalmanagement.com. Before we begin our formal remarks, I need to remind everyone that part of our discussion today may include forward-looking statements, which are based on the expectations, estimates and projections of management as of today. Forward-looking statements in our discussion are subject to various assumptions, risks, uncertainties and other factors that are difficult to predict and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and therefore undue reliance should not be placed upon them. We refer all of you to our recent filings with the SEC for a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties that could impact the future operating results and financial condition of Regional Management Corp. We disclaim any intentions or obligations to update or revise any forward-looking statements except to the extent required by applicable law. I would now like to introduce Peter Knitzer, CEO of Regional Management Corp.

Thanks, Garrett, and welcome to our second quarter 2017 earnings call. As always, I want to thank everyone for participating this afternoon and for your continued interest in our company. I'm here with our CFO, Don Thomas, who will speak later on the call. I'm also here with some members of our financial team. For those of you with access to a computer or mobile device, we have once again posted a supplemental presentation on our website at regionalmanagement.com to provide additional color to our remarks. Our second quarter was strong on a variety of fronts as we continue to execute on our top priorities. We recorded double-digit year-over-year revenue growth for the fourth consecutive quarter. We further stabilize credit and we remain on track to complete our loan platform conversion by the end of the year. Importantly in the second quarter, we entered into a $125 million warehouse facility expanded a committed line under our current revolving credit facility to $638 million. Both of which are critical milestone in terms of executing a successful long-term growth plan and are testament to the strength of our company. All in all our team is accomplishing exactly what we need to do the setup Regional for long-term probable growth. As you can see on Slide 3, in the second quarter we’ve reported net income of $6.1 million, an increase from $5.9 million in this prior year period. Our net income excluded $300,000 are after tax expense for COO transition costs. Including this non-operating expense, net income was up 3.8% in the second quarter of 2017. Diluted EPS for the quarter was $0.52 versus $0.49 in the prior year period. Our top-line remains strong with revenue up 14% versus second quarter of 2016. This was primarily driven by an increase in our finance…

Thank you, Peter, and hello to everyone on the call. Please turn to Slide 5 in the presentation. Ending net receivables increased double digits from the prior year period for the ninth consecutive quarter, increasing 12.5% to $727 million, net income increased to $6.1 million in the second quarter of 2017 from $5.9 million in the second quarter of 2016. The 2017 net income figure includes an after-tax expanse of $300,000 for COO transition cost, which is a non-operating cost that did not occur last year. It is important to note, there was not a typical build of allowance in the second quarter of 2016, which makes the comparison less favorable than it otherwise would have been. Moving to Slide 6, you can see our product category trends. Core loan receivables at June 30, 2017 stood at $617 million growing 19.8% from the prior year period. Our large loan portfolio continues to be our growth engine as we saw a $73 million or 37.5% increase from the prior year and it was up 10.5% from the end of the first quarter. The large loan portfolio now stands at $268 million and accounts for nearly 37% of our total portfolio. Meanwhile, our small loan category saw a $29 million or 9% increase from the prior year and was up 4% from the end of the first quarter. Our other loan categories were down $7 million sequentially and $21 million from the prior year, primarily due to the continued liquidation in our automobile loan category. As noted previously, we do not expect the origination volume associated with our auto loan product to stem the current liquidation during 2017. Turning to Slide 7 and 8, the first of which is for total revenues and the second of which is for interest and fee…

Thanks, Don. To sum up we believe that we had a solid performance in all facets of our business in the second quarter. In the top-line, we saw another quarter of double-digit revenue growth. On the credit side, we further stabilized our delinquencies and reduced our net credit losses. The critical build-out of our loan platform remains on track with the successful conversion of Oklahoma and South Carolina. And last but certainly not least, in order to fund our growth, we significantly increased our funding capacity as well as further diversified our funding sources. All in we are continuing to position Regional to achieve ongoing long-term profitable growth. Thanks for your time and interest. I would like to now open up the call for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question is from the line of John Hecht with Jefferies. Your line is now open.

Thanks guys. Just real quick on the expense desk as Don you just covered. And so you said if I heard you right about $2.3 million of incremental total SG&A expense in the second half versus the first half.

That's sequentially from second quarter to third quarter, John.

Okay. And then it would that that I guess base increase in the third quarter persistent in the fourth quarter?

Most of it will, some of it will not. Look at our trend from 2016, you see we had a bump in the third quarter and it fell back down some in the fourth quarter. And incentives are a portion of the reason why we see some increase in the third quarter every year. Our incentive costs are aligned – profitability. So it's not just straight line across the year.

Okay. And, yeah, I understand some of this is investment growth as well. Any thoughts just in terms of that trend as you go into 2018?

We expect continued growth on our top-line as well as bottom line, John. We have in addition to the build-out of our digital channels, improved targeting and segmentation, which will continue to improve in 2018 enabling us to be both more efficient and more effective, plus as I mentioned earlier in my remarks, we expect to build out more de novo branches in 2018, once we complete the system conversion.

Okay. And then I know some of it was related to delinquency trends and so forth that your installment below both big and small symbol on each side you had yield-on-yield growth quarter-to-quarter here. I’m wondering if you could may be discuss the competitive market or any kind of mix shift and what that might mean for yields into the near term, or I guess near to intermediate term?

Well as you can see we continue to grow our large loan portfolio significantly. It’s now 37% of our overall portfolio. And a lot of that comes from a shift or an up-sell from small to large. While in a short term we might see a slight decrease in yield from that shift. We’ve been able to maintain the overall yield by increasing our small loans, as well as our large loans. But over time it may shift somewhat lower, but we believe that our models indicate that we will make it up on volumes.

Okay. And then final question on credit. In the aggregate you look at delinquency trends seasonal yield factors and so forth, your credit has been pretty stable. And I'm wondering is that just – is that reflective of just to really I guess stable end market trends in terms of your borrowers ability to repay their debt or is it just fine tuning underwriting as the end markets change, I’m wondering, kind of what you’re seeing in terms of patterns and behavior from that perspective?

Well it’s a combination of a lot of things John. We have tightened credit in certain pockets as I've discussed on previous quarter calls. We've also increased our emphasis with centralized collections. And we do have that lift that I discussed at the end of the fourth quarter, where we found certain cohorts that we needed to tighten down and that's helped to improve both delinquencies and our loses. As I just mentioned we expect that to continue into the third quarter.

Alright guys, thanks very much.

Thanks John.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of David Scharf with JMP Securities. Your line is open.

Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. May be follow-up on just the last question on credit. I was looking in my notes from the Q1 call and I think when you were providing guidance at the time in early May you had indicated that the loss rate would improve a bit seasonally into Q2, but that we shouldn't expect it to be down by as much as 100 basis points and in fact it came in that that much lower. And I think when I back out those insurance moves it looks like it was down almost 150 basis points. I'm just curious if there was anything you could pinpoint in the quarter in terms of payment patterns or whether it was the large versus small loan category. Where the outperformance on credit came from? And also based on that observation how we ought to think about the allowance rate in the back half of the year?

Well in terms of – you’re hundred percent right I was asked the question you're expected to decrease a 100 basis points. I thought it would be somewhere in the middle, we actually outperformed that, a part of it centralized collections even though it only covered a small portion of our overall branch network, the portion of our receivables. We also just were able through the tightening that on that cohort that was not doing as well as we anticipated it got much better in the second quarter than we anticipated. So overall the combination of our centralized collections do better than we anticipated, the cohort flowing through a little faster, higher delinquency on higher net credit losses, led us the 100 basis point decrease.

Got it. Can you remind us on the centralized collections effort and that was highlighted as one of the areas of increased investment. I mean, is the goal to have this ultimately, completely replaced branch level collections or is it a supplement?

It is actually not to replace our branch collections efforts. Rather what we have found is we see a lift in our later stage delinquency buckets by centralizing our efforts. And we also see a lift, we’ve seen this in the test-and-learn approach we've have taken with centralized collections. We see improvements on the one to 59 because that what’s the branches are focusing on. We also see an improvement in the 60 plus delinquencies, because that’s where our centralized collections is focused on. So all in all, it improves us on all ends of the delinquency section.

Got it. And what percentage of the branches is it covering right now you mentioned it's still early stages.

Still early stages and I don't have that number in front of me. We're still building it out which is part of our third quarter increase in our G&A. So we’ve been in somewhat of a test and learn mode though we've gotten better results than we anticipated, as I mentioned. I don't recall exactly what percentage it is, but we're still on the build out mode John – David, excuse me David.

Got it. Will obviously keep an eye on those developments there. I guess last question, then I'll get back in queue. Any commentary on, this relates to John's question on just consumer health and what you're witnessing. But anything you can add about maybe the quality of loan apps you're getting, the approval rates, whether you're finding that it's not just that one cohort you've been highlighting. I'm wondering are you seeing greater household debt now in perhaps having to approve fewer loans or focus more on repeat borrowers as opposed to new customers. Just any background on sort of that end market mix, would be helpful.

Sure David. So one of the shortcomings of our old heritage [ph] system is we only see what comes through as a booked loan. In the NLS system we will actually have those that are applied, those that are approved that that are booked. We just don't have insight and we just converted Oklahoma and South Carolina, South Carolina being our largest state today. So we don't really have a good view on those applied versus those booked. In terms of the overall consumer we've seen in other segments of the consumer financings, consumer loan business some pressure. Credit card companies was reported in the journal that they’ve seen pressure on the credit losses. We've been relatively steady. And as we've mentioned, we've tightened our criteria where we've seen pockets of potential weakness. So, so far so good and our consumers have really not built-up that we've seen an over levered position.

Got it. Thanks very much guys.

Thanks David.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Sanjay Sakhrani with KBW. Your line is open.

Hi this is Maja Feenick filling in for Sanjay. Thanks for taking my question. You had mentioned before that similar to other states that had previously been converted you planned for a temporary slowdown in production and then an increase in delinquencies. Could you perhaps size that impact on delinquencies? And then how should we see that flowing through into future charge offs?

Sure, we saw of the same behavior in North Carolina and New Mexico when we converted those states, we plan for it. Let me just comment on any conversion that I've experienced that, I think, anyone in the industry has experienced. It takes one to two months for our employees to really get familiar with the new software. We're going from manual decisioning and credit to actually automated decisioning. And even if it is better which this is, change is difficult and change takes time for people to get accustomed to it. So we do anticipate a couple, one to two months of these temporary decreases and increases. And we don't anticipate it lasting beyond that, nor do we foresee material overall increases in our delinquencies and charge offs. One of the things also that we've done in our conversion schedule is we've de-risked it by spreading it out across the year so that we were not going to see a major impact because of the way we staggered each state on conversions.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. And next question is from the line of Arren Cyganovich with D.A. Davidson. Your line is open.

Thanks. Just following-up on the last question, when you start – talking about the one or two months of slower production as you get your employees used to the new systems, that's not expected to cause a material slowdown in your overall receivables growth.

No we really haven't seen that in our prior conversions. There will be a slight dip which if we didn't plan for, I got to be honest would be irresponsible on our part. We're still anticipating strong growth and have planned for that. So one state, or two states even if they are large are not going to have a significant impact on our overall growth.

Okay great. And then, I guess, in terms of the overall conversions this is now you are through five states, you have four remaining there, correct?

That's correct.

I guess shifting over to the funding side you have a new warehouse facility that you sort of drawn. Maybe you could just talk a little bit about the intended use for that assuming asset backed financing over time and maybe the time frame you expect to build a pool before you enter that market.

Well as we mentioned this is facility will be funded by large loans only, which as we mentioned on the call, has been a huge portion of our growth. And I’ll let Don take the latter part he’s probably more familiar with that and more capable of answering that.

Yes today we have $268 million of large loans on the books, plenty enough for securitization transaction. We're going to gradually fund the warehouse over some period of time maybe nine months to 12 months before we do our first transaction.

Okay, great. And is just lastly as I’m still somewhat relatively new to this, could you remind me the seasonality in delinquencies and charge offs over the next couple of quarters and the seasonality for – if there's any material seasonality for yields as well?

Yes delinquency typically rises in the second half of the year, it's usually lower at March 31 and then over time with the move up some to the end of the year and peak again before moving down in the first quarter. Losses would follow that and the normal schedule falling off the back end of your delinquency schedule. As far as yield goes, we see some declining yield late in the first quarter, early in the second quarter because a lot of the income tax pay downs that we received are paying off some of our higher rate loans. And so we do see a little dip usually in the first half of the year.

Got it. Okay. All right thank you very much.

Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And your next question is from the line of John Rowan with Janney. You line is now open.

Good afternoon guys. The guidance on net charge offs and net charge rate obviously refer lower numbers sequentially. But I'm assuming that, that doesn't translate necessarily into lower provision guidance just given the growth in the portfolio or all else as equal?

Yes John the provision itself has to include the allowance bill. So it won't go down quite as much as just NCOs by themselves. So you're right on that.

Okay. And sorry, just to one more question on the G&A. So obviously we know the guidance for G&A going up a little over $2 million sequentially and a good chunk of that is in advertising. I surely make sure I understood the guidance correctly but the rest of the build is for a higher operating cost relating to the centralized collection facility. I just wanted to make sure that I kind of have the right relationship there.

Yes centralized collections is a portion of the increase John, branch higher average wages is another portion of that. We've seen specific portions of the country where we've had some wage pressure and we've responded to that and have some higher wage costs. And in addition to that is the third quarter we have growth and so we respond to hiring few more people to handle the additional accounts. And then we've hired a few people in our IT group to continue to handle our NOS conversion and then incentives was the other item and mentioned. So collectively $2.3 million to $2.7 million.

Okay, and then the last question from me. You guys obviously said that next year once you wrap kind of the system conversion you're going to open more than 15 stores for the year was the guidance. I mean can you give us a ballpark is it 20 stores, 40, 50, I mean just some type of guidance if you will on the de novo outlook for 2018?

Yes John, at this point we’re still formulating plans for 2018. We feel very confident that it's going to be an increase versus 2017. We're not really ready yet because we haven't gone through our planning cycle to provide more of than that from a guidance standpoint, but will provide more of than that from a guidance standpoint but it will definitely be more than 2017. And we'll come back to you when we get our plans formulated and locked in with more specificity on that front.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Thank you. And I’m not showing any further questions in the queue. I would like to turn the call back to Peter Knitzer with his final remarks.

Well I want to thank everybody for your interest and for participating today. Really, we're excited about the trajectory that we're on as you can tell from our remarks because we had a pretty solid second quarter. And we look to continue to build our foundation in our loan management system, centralized collections and overall portfolio of growth into the second half of this year. Thank you all very much. And look forward to speaking with you later on.

And with that ladies and gentlemen we thank you for participating in today's program. You may all disconnect, have a wonderful day.