Good morning and welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to the RLI Corp. Second Quarter Earnings Teleconference. At this time, I would like to inform you that this conference is being recorded, and that all participants are in a listen-only mode. At the request of the company, we will open the conference up for question and answers after the presentation. Before we get started, let me remind everyone that through the course of the teleconference, RLI management may make comments that reflect their intentions, beliefs, and expectations for the future. As always, these forward-looking statements are subject to certain risk factors which could cause actual results to differ materially. These risk factors are listed in the company's various SEC filings, including in the annual Form 10-K, which should be reviewed carefully. The company has filed a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission that contains the press release announcing second quarter results. RLI management may make reference during the call to operating earnings and earnings per share from operations, which are non-GAAP measures of financial results. RLI's operating earnings and earnings per share from operations consist of net earnings after the elimination of after-tax realized investment gains or losses. RLI's management believes this measure is useful in gauging core operating performance across reporting periods, but may not be comparable to other company's definitions of operating earnings. The Form 8-K contains reconciliation between operating earnings and net earnings. The Form 8-K and press release are available at the Company’s website at www.rlicorp.com I would now like to turn the conference over to RLI’s Vice President, Corporate Development, Mr. Aaron Jacoby. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, good morning to everyone. Welcome to the RLI earnings call for the second quarter of 2018. Joining me on today’s call are Jon Michael, Chairman and CEO; Craig Kliethermes, President and Chief Operating Officer; and Tom Brown, Senior Vice President and CFO. I’m going to turn the call over to Tom first to give some brief opening comments on the quarter’s financial results. Then, Craig will talk about operations and market conditions. Next, we’ll open the call to questions, and Jon will finish with some closing comments. Tom?

Thanks, Aaron and good morning, everyone. Last night we reported second quarter operating earnings of $0.60 per share, a 93 combined ratio coupled with improving investment income and lower income taxes resulted from tax reform contributed to the operating results. On the loss side of the equation, $5.5 million in net catastrophe losses related to volcanic activity in Hawaii were more than offset by $12 million of net favorable reserve releases spread across each segment. Specifically, underwriting margins were solid across the portfolio with combined ratios of 98 in casualty, a 90 in property despite the lava losses and a 74 in surety. From a top-line perspective, gross written premium continue to grow at a strong pace, up 12% in the quarter, consistent with the sequential increases reported in the previous two quarters. Casualty grew 12% on the strength of products such as D&O, transportation, excess umbrella and some of our newer surplus lines products. Property was up 16% driven by marine and our catastrophe surplus lines. Surety's growth of 7% was notable after several quarters of modest declines and extended across each sub-product. Complementing this underwriting performance, investment income was up a strong 10% compared to the second quarter of 2017 marking the 5th consecutive quarter of growth in investment income. A larger invested asset base as well as higher yields led to the increase in investment income. Earnings in our equity investees Maui Jim and Prime Holdings were also up slightly from the second quarter of 2017. The effective tax rate was 16% for the quarter benefiting from tax reform. This contributed roughly $0.06 per share in operating earnings when compared to the second quarter of 2017. In May 2018, we increased our quarterly ordinary dividend to $0.22 per share, representing our 43rd consecutive year of paying and increasing regular dividends. Our overall business fundamentals and operating income remains strong in the second quarter, combining this some modest investment portfolio returns book value rose to $19.17 per share in the quarter inclusive of dividends paid. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Craig. Craig, thanks.

Thank you, Tom. Good morning, everyone. Overall very solid quarter, we were able to keep up the momentum on the top-line growing 12% for the quarter and year-to-date. The momentum has been a direct result of our talented associates investing in established and new relationships differentiating service to our chosen niche markets and long-term consistency of our specialty underwriting appetite. Our growth has come across most of the products in our diversified portfolio. Newer products account for a little more than 10% of top-line premium and these same products have driven about 40% of the premium growth for the first half of this year. Although, we view top-line growth as important over a cycle, what drives us is our relentless pursuit of underwriting profit. The health of our overall portfolio and our willingness to quickly address in the underperforming business gives us the confidence to grow in what is still a challenging overall market. As Tom noted earlier, we were able to deliver premium growth, while delivering positive underwriting results across all three reporting segments for the quarter and year-to-date. I will give a little more detail by segment. In casualty, we grew 12% for the quarter and 11% year-to-date, while delivering a combined ratio of 98 over both timeframes. Rates continue to be up double-digits in all wheels related exposures. We also saw a little positive movement in our executive products and excess liability businesses. A hopeful sign that the market is responding rationally to underwriting results and underlying loss cost trends. The market is still very competitive in the workers' compensation and medical professional liability sectors. But fortunately these are smaller businesses for us. We realized double-digit growth rates in our established transportation and executive products businesses. Our excess liability business continues to grow at high single-digit rates,…

Thanks, Craig. Yes, we can now open the call up for questions.

Thank you, sir. The question-and-answer session will begin at this time. [Operator Instructions] And our first question will come from Randy Binner with B. Riley FBR.

Hey, thanks. Good morning. I just had a few, I guess, for some just on Maui Jim it looked better than expected was there anything unusual with the performance there or anything one time in nature?

Randy, good morning, it’s Tom Brown, no nothing that would jump out here that’s unusual nature this quarter just kind of continued sustained growth.

Yes, sustained growth, but that -- I think that’s maybe the best quarter you’ve ever had with them, is that right?

I mean it’s been good I think it continues to grow at a steady pace. I don’t know if I know of hand if it’s the best one ever.

Okay. But that’s just good steady growth. And then Craig, you got to it on some of the top-line, but it seems like the wheels risk is leading the top-line growth in casualty and is that I guess how sustainable is that? It seems like you’ve been -- and maybe help me remember this, but maybe it’s three quarters now where it seems like the folks have been leading certain risks and you all have been taking those risks on it at much higher rates. Is that coming to a close? Or is that going to be somewhat of an ongoing opportunity for you rest of the year?

Randy, I don't want to speak too far into the future. But we're working on July renewals now and WE haven't seen a slow down as of that short time period. I mean, people are still exiting, we view that as an opportunity in the spaces that we play. We're not really entering spaces that we aren't comfortable -- we aren’t entering any spaces, we're not comfortable with or don't have expertise. But we've seen people retract from the truck, public and some of the specialized commercial auto spaces and we've been able to fill that void. If these are not new businesses for us, these are businesses we've been in for over 20 years. And we have the people that we're pretty comfortable know how to make money and what the right rate level is in that space. So, we're hoping that opportunity continues disruption creates opportunity for us generally as long as we have footholds in those spaces and we do there. So, I mean, we're hoping the opportunities for a while.

Okay, great. And then just on surety just a little detailed question. But the expense ratio has been running a little bit higher versus what we expected. And I think it's somewhat a function too of the top-line being conservative, but is there -- outside just amortizing fixed costs against some of a lower premium base, is there anything going on with expenses in the surety segment?

Randy, it's Tom. Yes, there are a couple things. I mean it is a mix, if you see some of the growth in those sub-products is maybe skewed a bit to those with a higher acquisition costs. But I think equally important. We have made some rather significant investments in technology particularly on transactional side of that business, which is largely the miscellaneous surety to prove our ease of doing business with a customer. That started coming online and starting to be amortized into the expense ratio, that's all positive.

So is that like given brokers the opportunity to buy into easily on their phone or something like that, is that what you mean just for small miscellaneous bonds?

We've invested pretty heavily not so much in mobile technology as of yet because we don't think our producers are quite -- they're not clamoring for that right now. But certainly new portals and things like that that make it easier to access information from us and also create awareness of the other products that we have in our portfolio.

Okay, understood. Thank you.

We'll now take a question from Arash Soleimani with KBW.

Thanks. Looking at the casualty segment, how would you bifurcate the growth this quarter in terms of rate versus exposure unit growth?

Arash, this is Craig. I mean, the ones -- the products that are growing the fastest are getting a fair amount of rate, auto is getting rate, excess liability getting rate, D&O space, directors and officers is getting rate. So, I mean each product stands on its own, if we just pick on auto, it's about half is rate driven.

Okay. And just with the growth that you've had, obviously this was the third quarter in a row, as you mentioned with double-digit growth. To what extent does that change, how you guys would look at the potential for a special dividend? Does it make it a bit less likely since there is more growth opportunity now, or does it not really change? How you think about that?

We'll look at that -- we continue to look at that as we always do. We can use the capital we'd rather use it. If not, we'll give it back. So I don't -- maybe on the margin it makes a difference, but not much.

Okay. And can you talk a little bit more about the surety growth since that's -- this was kind of a pop from past quarters?

Sure. I mean the surety growth as I said came across all the segments. I mean, some of it is growing current relationships, a lot of it is really growing current relationships. So not really building new relationships. It's really tough to add new business per se. But we have grown lines with individual customers that we already have relationships with. And then some is particularly on the contract surety side is the pickup on the bids and construction market. So that's been an opportunity for us. So -- and on the -- I’ll say miscellaneous side we did -- we made some efforts to try to separate our underwriting and sales force and get our sales force more dedicated focused on marketing and sales and that's helped a lot too.

Okay. And was there anything notable about why those things all I guess were happening this quarter? Because it looks like 2Q, 2018 growth was the fastest since even 1Q, 2016 it looks like.

It is and we just started the process it takes time for the fruits to deliver. And it's still going to be choppy, because I mean it really depends on the accounts that our underwriters see at that given time if it was all new business next quarter and it's not expanding relationships or it's not as well priced or as good of credit quality. I mean there is the potential that we'd be down next quarter. So I wouldn't necessarily -- I mean, it's going to be choppy as I said in my opening remarks.

Okay. And just my last question on the expense ratio within casualty, just the year-over-year increase there driven by the new products and investments around those?

Arash, yes, I think you got it there. With the recent addition of products over the last year and half to two years there is a lot of -- fair amount of startup with premium has growing as Craig mentioned in his comments. But it takes some time to kind of cover that fixed costs if you will in addition to the ongoing variable costs.

And I think we've also invested more in technology in that space as well. Both surety and particularly personalized space we've been really investing more on the technology side as well.

Okay, great. Thanks for the answers.

We'll now take a question from Jeff Schmidt with William Blair.

Hi, good morning everyone. Looking at the casualty underlying loss ratio so ex-CAT development. It look to be up about every quarter for last probably two years continue to go up in the quarter looks to be around 120 basis points. And we talked about this in the past, but could you maybe elaborate on the trends you're seeing there. And beyond I know you said that new products or newer products have some higher underlying losses. But can you talk about some of the underlying trends there that you're seeing?

Sure. When you refer to going up, first I thought you were referring to the reserve development or favorable development. You're actually referring to the underlying loss ratio, so I'll answer the question on loss ratio if that's the question. So, I mean, a lot of that is driven by new products. When we go into new product we want to -- we're hoping that the approach we take is a conservative one. But you don't have a lot of past loss experience. And then we also have products like transportation that are growing. I mean we definitely want to take a cautious approach to that one. We've had a little bit of a -- some activity in prior years in the past and we want to make sure that we've got our arms around that as we're growing that. So I mean you will find that's always been our approach to I won’t rapidly, but more faster growing products. And at the same time, I do think we have seen -- certainly it started with auto an increase in loss cost, underlying loss cost inflation. And we're going to be a little more cautious on our underlying loss cost trends we put into our assumptions in regards to booking ratio. So I would say overall, we’ve probably taken our casualty underlying loss cost assumptions up 1 or 2 points over the last 18 months. And that's pretty much across the board in casualty. So hopefully that's a cautious approach, hopefully that won't materialize, but we certainly saw a little bit of that in auto. So we'd rather hear on that side of the equation I think.

Are you seeing any change in the legal environment in particular?

What we’ve seen, certainly we've seen what we would perceive as an increase of social inflation toward trends things like that. I mean you've got, I mean you guys read about them but funded litigation. I think the standard of care for professionals continues to rise. And when I say professionals not just medical professionals it could be architects, engineers, professional drivers, contractors whatever. I think there has been some run-up of medical bills. Obviously distracted driving is an impact on the auto side. People live longer out of serious accidents, which obviously cost more to keep for their medical bills on an ongoing basis. And I think media coverage has certainly increased. The level of sensationalism and to some extend desensitizing to big numbers and big verdicts is certainly has an impact as it continues to be for trade in the media and that creates an interest I think from the plan part it continues to drive to maybe have an unwillingness to settle and to go right through those court house steps and go in front of a jury. So certainly those are all speculate I have no hard data on that, I mean other than we have anecdotal information from different claims or whatever and it feels like there’s more of that. But I have no hard evidence of that, but I certainly read like you guys do when other people are talking about it too. So I have to think that there must be something to it.

Right. Yes and that one can be tough to kind of track, hitting on commercial auto again is that or the transportation book, is that running above 100% a combined still I mean I know you’ve been taking rates for a while there?

I mean we’re booking at currently to about 100 combined. So we’re not really generating a lot of underwriting profit out of that product line for current accident years. And obviously you guys know our model our underwriters really have no incentive to do that unless they really believe it’s better than that. So they certainly think it’s better than that, but we’re going to take that more cautious approach to where we’re at with that product given the growth. Even though half of the (inaudible).

Do you have a target for where you think that could go or…?

No, I mean, we don’t target any of our products we obviously -- we want people to take advantage of the opportunities that are presented. We also want them to retrench if there’s no opportunity and they can’t write stuff at an underwriting profit zone.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] We’ll go next to Mark Dwelle with RBC Capital Markets.

Yes, good morning. You’ve already covered a lot of the topics, but can we talk a little bit more about the volcano losses. Thanks for the stuff that you shared, I guess based on the total claims are you into a reinsurance layer on this now such that if there’s any additional losses they’ll primarily be covered by reinsurance at this point?

Actually reinsurance is an interesting concept for this, because as I mentioned it’s a slow moving catastrophe. So most catastrophe treaties that I'm aware of have an hour’s clause. So those losses can only be accumulated through losses that have occurred within 128 hours or 172 hours whatever the timeframe maybe. So, I mean, these would accumulate over two months so there really is no CAT reinsurance that would be available unless it would be like a complete volcanic eruption that losses occurred all within like one or two or let’s say seven days. So -- but that being said, I mean, we manage our exposure just like we do with earthquake and wind and we look for aggregations and spread of risk and realize we have less than 3% market share in Hawaii and out of this lava flow and the direction of lava flow that where things are headed today we really only have one more house that is actually in -- I’ll call it in the way of lava flow. And as of right now the lava is flowing around it like a wish bone, but into the sea. So we may or may not have that loss, not other fishers could erupt and on other parts of the island. I would like to add one little thing on this, because I mentioned media sensationalism or media coverage before. So I don’t know if people know this, but based on media coverage you would not know this. But literally affected area on the Hawaiian island is 0.3% of the square miles of that island. Now based on TV you’re watching you would never assume that it was 0.3% maybe like 30%. So I just would point that out, but this is actually a small area on the Hawaiian island, the big island although that I'm not saying that to demean the people that actually have losses because there are real losses on that island I think over 700 homes have burned and we’re doing the best we can to make sure our insureds are taken care of and I think we’ve done a really good job being onsite. We have a person actually lives on the island and we actually send someone from Chicago already over there and we’ve written checks for 40% of the amount we owe to the people that we think we owe I guess.

Okay. So the loss in the quarter was the full amount you owe and they've been in your paid losses with respect to 40% of the total? Just to clarify that loss.

That's correct. And basically we're waiting for them to actually spend the money to pay the rest. We know we're going to pay the rest, they just have to actually -- the way the policy works that they have to actually show us that they actually rebuild the home or they brought a new home. And as soon as they show us that they're spending the money, we are more than happy to reimburse them. We actually prepaid them a lot of loss basically additional living expense when they had to relocate.

Now, presumably they can't rebuild where the home was previously, right? They'll have to rebuild in some other location and that's still covered?

I'm not a land development expert, so I can't comment. But yes, that will be difficult to rebuild on top of lava. Not to mention the access to some of those places.

Great. Do you have a sense of what the industry loss is with respect to that event?

I mean I have no idea other than -- but I know our market share in Hawaii is a little less than 3%. I know some of the homes in the affected are uninsured. I know some of the homes in the area are insured by excess than surplus lines riders, which we obviously are 1 excess to surplus lines rider, but we right admitted in Hawaii. So our product covers fire following lava flow. Some of those excess policies may not, I don't know. So it may be hard to speculate what the total industry loss is, but from what I understand over 700 homes have been lost.

I appreciate the color on that, that's very helpful. That's all my questions.

If there are no further questions, I will now turn the conference back to Mr. Jonathan Michael.

Thank you all for joining us again. It was another good quarter. It's our third consecutive double-digit growth in premium respectable 93 combined ratio in spite of the losses that we have in the volcano. Thanks again, and we'll talk to you next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, if you wish to access the replay for this call, you may do so by dialing 1-888-203-1112 with an ID of 5535629. This concludes our conference for today. Thank you for participating and have a nice day. All parties may now disconnect.