Good afternoon, and welcome to Royal Gold's Fiscal 2016 Fourth Quarter and Year-End Earnings Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] Please also note that this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Karli Anderson. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good morning and welcome to our discussion of Royal Gold's fourth quarter and full year fiscal 2016 results. This event is being webcast live, and you will be able to access a replay of this call on our website. Participating on the call today are Tony Jensen, President and CEO; Mark Isto, VP, Operations; Stefan Wenger, CFO and Treasurer; Bill Heissenbuttel, VP, Corporate Development; and Bruce Kirchhoff, VP, General Counsel and Secretary. Tony will open with an overview of the quarter, followed by Mark with an operational update and Stefan with a financial update. After management completes their opening remarks, we'll open the line for a Q&A session. This discussion falls under the Safe Harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. A discussion of the company's current risks and uncertainties is included in the Safe Harbor and cautionary statement in today's press release and slide presentation and is presented in greater detail on our filings with the SEC. Now I will turn the call over to Tony.

Good morning and thank you for joining the call. Today, I would like to focus our discussion on the excellent fourth quarter results, but I would first like to reflect a bit on the fiscal year. Fiscal 2016 was a year of peaks and valleys. We closed $1.4 billion of new investments in the first fiscal quarter at a point in the gold price cycle that we viewed favorably. These new investments at Andacollo, Pueblo Viejo, Wassa and Prestea are already among our top five revenue producers, and we look forward to Rainy River's contribution in about a year. We then turned our attention to liquidity concerns at Thompson Creek for much of the remainder of the fiscal year to protect our investment at Mount Milligan. We're very pleased with the outcome of those efforts, and I will speak more about that later. The fiscal year was also of two mines with regard to gold market sentiment. The gold price experienced a six-year low in December, only to be followed with renewed market appreciation for the safe haven and strong currency characteristics of gold in calendar 2016. While the path was not linear from the start to end of the fiscal year, we delivered on our corporate objectives of providing shareholder exposure to growth, quality and opportunity. Now focusing on the quarterly results, I will begin on slide four. We can also apply the objectives of growth, quality and opportunity to the quarterly results. We recorded solid growth across all our financial metrics. Our new investments are now fully integrated into our financial results, with the first recorded sale of silver from Pueblo Viejo during the quarter. The new business added in fiscal 2016 contributed about 25% of revenues during the quarter. We have often said good mines get better…

Thanks, Tony. We are now turning to slide eight. Pueblo Viejo is our third largest source of revenue and one of the world's most prolific mines. We're pleased to see that Barrick reiterated its full year 2016 production guidance of 600,000 to 650,000 ounces of gold. During the quarter, we saw improved gold recoveries due to more favorable ore types being processed and silver recovery improving to 60% through process enhancements. Turning to slide nine, we are pleased to see the -- see that $420 million Peñasquito Pyrite Leach Project was recently approved by Goldcorp's Board. Goldcorp states that the Pyrite Leach Project is expected to recover approximately 40% of the gold and 48% of the silver currently reporting to tailing. And we will -- and will add incrementally annual gold production of between 100,000 and 140,000 ounces and between 4 million and 6 million ounces of silver. All permits are on-hand for construction to commence next month, with a forecast for commercial production from the Pyrite Leach Project in the first quarter of 2019. Royal Gold has a 2% Net Smelter Return royalty on all metals produced from Peñasquito. On slide 10, we are actively monitoring underground development at Wassa and Prestea through monthly operational updates and quarterly site visits. Last month, Golden Star announced that it began stoping at the mid-grade F Shoot area in its Wassa underground deposit using long-haul open stoping and plans to access the higher grade B Shoot in early 2017. Underground development rates at Wassa continue to trend upwards and currently average 10 to 12 meters per day. The underground projects are scheduled to contribute to production beginning in late this calendar year from the Wassa underground and in mid 2017 from the Prestea underground. Golden Star expects 2016 gold production of 180,000…

Thanks Mark. On slide 12, I will summarize a few of our financial highlights. As Tony mentioned, fourth quarter revenue of $94 million was up nearly 30% from a year ago based on increased volume and a 6% increase in the gold price. DD&A was approximately $470 per GEO for the quarter, resulting in a full year rate for fiscal 2016 of $460 per GEO. Looking forward to fiscal 2017, we expect that DD&A per GEO will be between $450 and $500. For the fourth quarter, our effective tax rate was about 22%. And for the full year, our normalized effective tax rate was approximately 20%. We utilized our strong operating cash flow to repay another $25 million of debt and to distribute $15 million in dividends during the quarter. Our current liquidity of over $500 million includes about $140 million of working capital, plus $375 million of revolver capacity. Our remaining commitments include $75 million to New Gold for Rainy River and $30 million to Golden Star for Wassa and Prestea. We expect to fund the balance for Rainy River around the end of September and the balance for Wassa and Prestea with $20 million in October and the last $10 million in January of 2017. While we have been focused on paying down our revolving credit facility over the past few quarters, during the next couple of quarters, we expect that debt repayments will cease while we fund our remaining commitments. We expect to resume paying down the revolver during calendar 2017. I'll now turn the call back over to Tony.

Thanks, Stefan. We're very pleased with the quarterly results and the significant investments that we made to the portfolio over the last fiscal year. We are focused externally again, and we will continue to look for opportunities that will provide our shareholders exposure to calling out assets with upside potential. On slide 13, I will leave you with our vision and strategy that we shared at our Investor Day. We don't need to be the largest company in our business, but we do want to be the most valuable. We believe the results that we have delivered today, strong financial and operational growth, combined with the potential for expansion at several properties at no cost to Royal Gold are certainly consistent with that goal. Operator, that concludes our prepared marks, and we'll be happy to open the line for questions.

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Mike Jalonen from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

I guess I’ve been called worse, Tony.

Yes, Mr. Jalonen, we know who you are.

Yes, just calling on Voisey’s Bay there. So I guess, you basically said it, no revenue until the litigation is resolved, which we saw there in the fiscal quarter. I guess, what is the timeline for this being resolved? And is Vale accruing the money that will be owed to you and they keep it in a separate account assuming they lost? That's my question.

Yes. Mike, let me just start with the latter first. I think that's a question you have to ask Vale. I don't think we have that transparency in how they're going to account for this. But, as you know, we've been very active in our position that we think that the deductions that they're making are inappropriate, essentially turning an NSR into an NPI-type royalty. So we feel very strongly about it. We're defending ourselves very actively. We have gone through a lot of the litigation process already from a discovery standpoint, and we're going to be thorough and dedicated. And we think that the schedule that's before the court now would call for a trial somewhere in the very early part of 2018. So that's kind of the guidance that we would give that until we have clarity from the court that we should not be or you should not be expecting any revenue to be in our financial results on a quarterly basis.

How long before this court would make a decision, do you think? Or is that just up in the air?

Yes. I'm looking at Bruce Kirchhoff, our General Counsel, and he's not able to make a prediction there. But certainly, it would take some time after the hearing that happens.

Where would the hearing be held? What court?

Yes. It'd be in St. John's.

I better book my ticket. Okay, well thanks. Good luck.

Thanks, Mike. Thanks for the question.

Our next question comes from Lucas Pipes of FBR & Co. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, everybody.

Good morning, Lucas.

So, Tony, if I understood you correctly there in your closing remarks of your prepared remarks, I think you mentioned "looking externally again." I was hoping if you could maybe define this a little bit more narrowly in terms of size, location, timing. I would appreciate your thoughts on that subject.

Yes, I'll be very, very general on that, Lucas. As you can imagine, we don't comment on any specifics with regard to business development, but we wanted to keep our powder dry during the course the first part of this calendar year, I should say, until we get clarity on the Mount Milligan situation. We think there's obviously a good result there. We never left the business development space. Bill and his team were active in monitoring and watching all things that were coming across the space. But we are now in a position where we think that Mount Milligan is such that we can look for new opportunities. We’ve said that we have over $0.5 billion in liquidity, and certainly, a transaction the size of several hundred million dollars would be of interest to us.

That's helpful. And, at the same time, I think you also would like to grow the dividend. Broadly speaking, do you have a preference of one over the other? Or are they not even mutually exclusive?

Yes. We think a good company ought to do both, and that's exactly what we're striving to do. We've been able to do that over the last 16 years, and that would certainly be the focus of our board and our management team.

Very helpful. I appreciate your thoughts. Thank you.

Thanks, Lucas.

Our next question comes from Andrew Kaip of BMO. Please go ahead.

Good morning, tony.

Good morning, Andrew.

Look, I'm just wondering, along the theme of the previous color, you also have some organic opportunities within your portfolio, and I'm just wondering what your view on some of those opportunities are. Probably the most significant would be Euromax and the Ilovitza project. Can you comment on how you see that developing and how that fits into that organic pipeline?

Okay. Andrew, you're speaking softly or the line is soft. So just for the benefit of the rest of the callers, let me try to paraphrase what I think you said and you can correct me if that's not right. But you're talking about other capital commitments we have within the company. And specifically, I think you were talking about the Ilovitza project. And there we have an option to put $160 million into the construction of the project to get 25% of the gold. Before I go on and answer that, is that a proper paraphrase of your question?

Well done.

Okay. So yes, Stefan spoke about what we have yet to deliver on our Rainy River transaction. That's $75 million. Mark mentioned some time near the end of September, plus or minus whatever, we'd expect to pay out the other bit. And then we have $30 million left on Wassa and Prestea. So those are usually handled out of cash flow. I think the one that you're most focused on, Andrew, is the $160 million from Ilovitza. First of all, we don't have a schedule where we could time that. There are still some deliverables that they have to achieve before we would ever get serious about putting a timeframe around that. But moreover, we look at that as a complete option. We'll look at it. At the time, if it makes sense to us to invest, we will. So that's one that we don't put quite in the same category as Wassa, Prestea and the Rainy River.

All right. At the same point in time, it does represent an opportunity for your company. And I'm just wondering, what is your current thinking about how that's going to develop?

Yes. We're getting into the areas where we're just not able to provide detail and comment and that specificity. But all I can give you is just a general statement to say that as in any business opportunity, we'll look at that at the time it comes into us. We'll make our decision based on the facts on the table at that time.

All right. Thanks very much.

Thanks, Andrew.

Our next question is a follow-up from Lucas Pipes of FBR & Co. Please go ahead.

Hey, thank you very much for taking the follow-up question. It's a broad industry question. Tony, you're extremely well connected across the gold space. And I was wondering how is the industry looking at production growth right now? I mean, prices have had an exceptional run this year. Is there a sense of urgency to add production back? Or based on the more recent experience, you mentioned December was the low. Are they still more hesitant to add production? Again, I would appreciate your kind of big picture thoughts on that.

Well, let me speak to my thoughts only and not put my opinion upon any producer out there. But I think this industry is one that's hungry for margin. We certainly have seen some escalating gold price over a number of years that really didn't lead to margin expansion. We saw production expansion during that period of time. So I think there will be a natural tendency for people to be looking for margin expansion. We're seeing some other larger companies that are starting to – right-size I guess will be my words, not theirs – right-size their portfolio for sustainability. And all that makes good sense to me.

And does that – I didn't want to say – attitude or approach to this market, does that reduce the set of opportunities in your opinion? Or how would you say it impacts Royal Gold's strategy, if at all?

Yes. The kind of projects that we're going to be interested in are going to be the higher-quality projects. And I think there'll still be opportunity for us in those areas. But today, I think the biggest opportunity for Royal Gold will be more on the base metal side where there's still balance sheets that are stressed and that market hasn't come back as much as gold and silver have in the recent six months or so. And that's just the natural for us. That's the place where we can get assets that are very long-lived. It's a natural arbitrage between us and the base metal companies. They cover the base metal, we cover the precious metal. So that's really, I think, where the future of our business lies, at least in the near term. Having said that, we will not give up on opportunities that might be in the precious metal producer space either.

And just to clarify, when you say base metals, would you do royalties or streams on base metal operations, but only underwrite the precious part of it? Or would you look at, essentially, copper, zinc mine, et cetera? If you could clarify that, I would appreciate it.

Lucas, thank you for putting that question back, because I don't want to miscommunicate here. We're very much looking for base metal mines with precious metal byproducts, and we really only desire the precious metals.

Perfect. Great. Thank you very much.

Thanks, Lucas.

Our next question comes from Shane Nagle of National Bank. Please go ahead.

Thanks, operator. Thanks for taking my question guys. Stefan, just real quick on the accounting treatment for Voisey's Bay here going forward. Will you just be booking the receivable, I guess, for your expected revenue over that time period maybe offset by the liability related to the Labrador tax? Or is there some different form of treatment there given the ongoing litigation?

Sure, Shane. Thanks for the question. Actually, for the last three quarters or so, we've just been booking the Voisey's Bay royalty on a cash basis, so we are not booking any revenue or expected revenue on an accrual basis for Voisey's Bay. We're just booking cash when it's received, and that's been the case for all of this fiscal year. So until we got better clarity or we started receiving payments, we will not have any revenue or accrued revenue for Voisey's Bay.

And the same goes for the tax liabilities as well I'm assuming?

That's correct.

Okay. So it will be some sort of cash settlement in 2018 or 2019 or whenever that's settled?

Yes. We really wouldn't have any accounting until we receive some cash or the litigation was settled in some way.

Okay. And then, Tony, maybe real quick just on the Rainy River, the tailings management facility. The timeline there with their revised plan, does it give you any pause on their expected time line? Or maybe asked another way, now that Mount Milligan is resolved, is there anything within the portfolio that maybe gives the team now a little bit of concern going forward?

Well, I was going to ask Mark to answer that question until you broadened it right there, and I'm just searching through my mind, our portfolio is running very, very well right now. So anything that we would have had concerns on, we would've guided the market, too, if that would be material. So nothing on that standpoint. You know that the management team is focused on the Voisey's Bay litigation and has been. We're not taking our eye off the ball, but Bruce is working on that. And with regard to Rainy River's construction there, we're very much focused on a quality project over the long term. And we have encouraged and we don't really need to emphasize this to New Gold because they know how to do things right. We want to make sure that they take the time and get the skills and resources they need to build a quality project for the next 1.5 decades or two2 decades. So we're quite comfortable with how that's coming together, Shane.

Great. Thanks, guys.

Thanks very much.

[Operator Instructions] This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Tony Jensen for any closing remarks.

Well, thanks, operator, and thank you for joining the call today. We surely appreciate your interest and continued support of Royal Gold, and we look forward to updating you on our next quarterly conference call. Thanks, everyone.

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.