Greetings and welcome to the Reynolds Consumer Products, Incorporated Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Mark Swartzberg, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you, sir. You may begin.

Thank you, operator. Good morning and thank you for joining us for Reynolds Consumer Products third quarter earnings conference call. Please note that this call is being webcast on the Investor Relations section of our corporate site at reynoldsconsumerproducts.com. Our earnings press release and presentation slides are also available. With me on the call today are Lance Mitchell, our President and Chief Executive Officer; Scott Huckins, our Chief Financial Officer and Nathan Lowe, Senior Vice President and Head of Financial Planning and Analysis. Following prepared remarks, we will open the call for a brief question-and-answer session. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that this morning's discussion will contain forward-looking statements which are subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances that could cause actual results and outcomes to differ materially from those described today. Please refer to the Risk Factors section in our SEC filings. The company does not intend to update or alter these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after the call. During today's call we will refer to certain non-GAAP or adjusted financial measures. Reconciliations of these GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures are available in our earnings press release, investor presentation deck and Form 10-Q which can be found on the Investor Relations section of our site. Now, I'd like to turn the call over to Lance.

Thank you, Mark and good morning, everyone. Our business is performing well and we are investing in new products, new business wins, and new cost savings opportunities to drive sustained, long-term profitable growth. Turning to the quarter, demand in our categories improved modestly by comparison to first half performance. Our retail volume was unchanged and in line with our categories after adjusting for product portfolio optimization and shipment timing as we covered on the Q2 call. We commercialized innovation across our categories, expanded our innovation pipeline, and drove increased awareness among younger consumers. We identified and delivered further Reyvolution cost savings, and we demonstrated the value of our diversified business and product portfolio, delivering revenue and earnings in line with our expectations, while continuing work to drive improved revenues and profitability in our seasonal business. Before reviewing each of our businesses, I want to remind you of some of the factors positioning RCP for sustained and attractive long-term growth. Our products are well known, affordable and convenient; we are effectively leveraging our business model to drive our categories and develop new business in partnership with our retail customers. We are successfully introducing new products to drive share; and as I mentioned, our pipeline is only getting stronger, including an expanding range of affordable, sustainable solutions. We're commercializing scientific advances and consumer insights acquired through sustained investment in R&D, including last year's purchase of Atacama Manufacturing. And we're reducing operational costs and identifying significant additional Reyvolution cost savings, providing additional resources for earnings growth. Our tableware business unit is a focus for many of you, as it is for us; so I'll speak to that first. The tableware business unit reported volume and earnings decline, primarily driven by lower foam plate volume and increased promotional spending. These decreases were largely driven…

Thank you, Lance. Good morning, everyone. We delivered on the financial priorities we’ve set at the start of 2024, again, in the third quarter driving our categories, earnings and cash flow, while also reducing leverage and increasing financial flexibility. Our Q3 results were in line with our expectations coming into the quarter, with the exception of non-retail revenues which exceeded our expectations by approximately $10 million. As a reminder, we estimated $15 million of revenues were pulled forward into Q2 from Q3 as contemplated in our guide. Total revenues of $910 million in the third quarter from the upper end of our guide, and consisted of $856 million in retail revenues, and $54 million of non-retail revenues. Third quarter adjusted EBITDA increased $6 million to $171 million, driven by lower operational and SG&A costs, partially offset by lower revenues. Earnings per share were $0.41, up 11% from the third quarter of 2023 reflecting EBITDA growth and lower interest expense from paying down debt. Cash conversion remains strong, with free cash flow of $93 million for the quarter. As a result of our strong profitability and balance sheet discipline, we continue to reduce net debt leverage now at 2.3 times trailing 12-months adjusted EBITDA as of Q3. And we made an additional $50 million voluntary principal payment subsequent to quarter-end, which makes this our third pre-payment of the year totaling $150 million year-to-date. Before turning to our year-to-date results and guide, I want to provide you with additional detail on tableware. As Lance said, tableware’s third quarter revenues were driven by lower foam plate volume and lower pricing resulting from increased promotion. However, the volume of other disposable tableware categories continued to respond well to our price pack architecture initiatives, increasing modestly and outperforming it’s categories by nearly one point. Tableware…

Thank you, Scott. I am pleased to announce the next stop in the history of leadership of RCP. As you can see from this morning's press release, Scott will succeed me as President and Chief Executive Officer of Reynolds Consumer Products, and Nathan Lowe, currently Head of Financial Planning and Analysis, will succeed Scott as Chief Financial Officer. Both changes are effective January 1, 2025, and I will continue in an advisory role until the planned transition of responsibilities to Scott and Nathan is complete. I'm extremely proud of all that we have achieved since my joining Reynolds Consumer Products as President and CEO 14 years ago, when we formed our CP through a combination of acquisitions. We've accomplished a lot over this period successfully making safety our number one priority, developing and implementing our business model of category leadership by providing brand and store grants which has proven to be a competitive advantage, expanding our new product pipeline, making our category stronger while also driving share, consistently delivering Reyvolution cost savings, while also identifying and unlocking significant additional savings opportunities. And most importantly, building a culture of collaboration, diversity, listening and teamwork that is creative, hardworking, and committed to winning every day in close partnership with our retail customers. As I said, this announcement is part of a planned transition, and now is the right time for it’s implementation. Our business is strong and performing very well, on-track to delivering it’s second best year of earnings since going public, a period including 2020 which was excessively strong because of the pandemic. Succession planning is an area of strength for RCP, and Scott and Nathan are highly qualified for these roles. I'm pleased that so many of you gotten to know Scott since his joining RCP, and that you've interacted with Nathan and again leading upto and since our listing as a publicly traded company. I look forward to working with each of you in the coming months, and I'm confident in seamless transitions. This will be my last quarterly earnings call as President and CEO of RCP. It's been a pleasure working with so many of you since our IPO in 2020. A sincere thank you to the 6,000 RCP employees that have made the last 14 years rewarding, both professionally and personally. A thank you to all of our retail partners; you have challenged us each day to be a better, stronger supplier to you and consumers. And thank you for all of you that call into these quarterly earnings releases; as you know, we take time in here preparing for these meetings, and we appreciate you taking the time to listen and for your interest in RCP. So the leadership changes are scheduled to take effect January 1, 2025. We would ask that you direct your questions to Scott and me during this call. Operator, over to you for questions.

Thank you. We'll now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And our first question will be coming from the line of Nik Modi with RBC Capital Markets.

Yes, thank you. Good morning, everyone. And Lance, Scott, Nathan, congratulations. And specifically to you, Lance, you -- I don't know if you know this, but you have doubled the average tenure of a CEO; so congratulations, really enjoyed working with you. On to my question; if you think about the kind of overall environment, I'd love to understand kind of how you guys are thinking about the holiday season, which is obviously a very important period for the company? And this just kind of that interplay between what is happening broadly in the economy and this kind of out-of-home into home migration. Would love to kind of get your perspective on those dynamics for the fourth quarter. Thank you.

Thank you, Nik and thank you for that comment. I am well aware of the fact that I extended the tenure of an average CEO, and I'm ready to retire. The state of the consumer remains challenged but as we talked about the Q2 earnings call, we have the plans and promotions and new product innovations in place for a strong holiday season. We're very confident in our guide that we just announced and from our retail partners and their confidence in our holiday season. So, what we're seeing so far is very positive and still early; but as you can guess, we do get early leads on what the holiday season looks like, and it's positive for 2024.

Our next question is from the line of Andrea Teixeira with JPMorgan.

And Lance, it was a pleasure also interacting with you, and thank you for educating us on the -- since the IPO. And wishing you a great new chapter in your life; and also congratulations to Scott and Nathan. Now my question is on the down trade that we have been seeing, in general. I think it's probably your RGM at play here, which obviously you have -- your private label offering, and you also have price points that allow for that. So I was wondering if you can help us kind of parse out that impact and see if there is any additional movements that you see or if you into 2025, we are mostly done or lapped into that price point situation? And similarly, for tableware, you've been very upfront since the IPO about the phone issue, right? So in general, some of the municipalities have been switching out. I was wondering if you also can give us like time of -- like, a bit of a timeframe, and now how much if your tableware is dependent upon that form? And if that's the case, how you're planning to continue to get ahead of it before having that impact, and potentially a lot of promo related to that form? Thank you so much.

Well, I'll start and I'll let Scott elaborate on it. First, regarding the down trade and private label; private label category shares are back to 2019 levels. On a year-over-year basis, private label share is up in some categories and down in some others; and we're influenced in responding to these changes very effectively. As we talked about over the years two things; one, our business model is a competitive advantage by doing both brands and store brands. And secondly, these categories are highly penetrated by private label already, so we don't see significant shifts occurring year-over-year between brands and private label. On tableware, the phone trend is one that we have been seeing since 2019 as we indicated in the prepared remarks. And we have very specific plans in product development and continue work across the portfolio to ensure growth of the overall tableware business. Scott?

I would just add to that. In terms of foam topic, the tableware broadly; tell a tale of two portfolios. The foam category is declining, so resourcing and focus on costs in our execution, that category would make sense. On the other hand, we have a lot of innovation, growth and outperformance of the comparative categories, away from foam; again, the imperative there will be to resource and invest for that growth.

How much -- and that's helpful. How much do you still have as a total foam of foam within your tableware sales?

We don't share SKU level details as you might imagine, given the competitive sensitivity of it; I certainly want to share it's the minority of the portfolio, but that's about as far as I think we can go.

Okay, that's fair. Thank you, both.

Our next question comes from the line of Mark Astrachan with Stifel.

I guess it's still pretty early on from a 2025 planning standpoint, but maybe trying to approach the question that you're not going to answer in a different way. How do we think about how are you thinking about just consumer demand? And as we sit here today, you talked encouragingly about holiday retail volumes have accelerated through 2024. So I guess you know kind of puts intake there in terms of just broad strokes, how you're thinking about consumer as we head into 2025? And then the other question related more to commodities; aluminum has really moved up here, I think more than many had expected. How do you think about that from here? And including if it stays here, do you have to take more pricing? Can you offset that in other ways from a cost pressure perspective? Thank you.

I'm taking the category and consumer question. I'll turn the commodity question over to Scott. We are seeing a bit of improvement in category volumes in Q3 versus our first half, and that included the added pressure of foam plates. It tells us the category price and volume has come in a better balance and at the start of the year, and the shift to at-home consumption continues to be a modest tailwind for our categories. Our Q4 guidance assumes a category forecast improvement from where we’ve seen Q3, and we've seen retail adjusted volume for shipment at time and portfolio optimization improve compared to the first half performance. So overall, sequentially, quarter-to-quarter, we're seeing modest improvement across most of our categories.

Good morning. Offer a couple of comments and thoughts on commodities. But the first would be on aluminum. Noted that we've seen escalation; we don't see a fundamental supply and demand imbalance, so we'll see if this is transitory or it sticks for a period of time. The thoughts on how to manage the commodities are a few. One is, aluminum is a traded exchange, so we look at and periodically execute caps, collars, those sorts of hedging tools or cost control tools. Number two, we also work with our vendors to attempt to have, for example, semi-annual price structures rather than monthly settlements that may not change the cost, per se, but it allows for more -- call it, control of those costs over a period of time. Third would be, and will always be, our ongoing focus on Reyvolution to continue to drive costs out of our business. Then, of course, the last lever is pricing; recognizing that pricing also comes with imperative of making sure we're thinking about price gaps, elasticity. So, I think that's the line-up against potential volatility and commodities.

Got it, that's helpful. And then, just on the credit facility, the upsizing there, and thoughts on what to potentially use it for, if anything, I suppose also sort of related to leverage continuing to fall here. So your balance sheet is probably at a better position than it's been in a really, really long time. Would that potentially change for the combination of the two -- look at more transformative M&A? Or are you happy with your categories at present; any update there?

I think you're asking about the size of the revolver, if I heard you right?

Both that and the fact that leverage on the balance sheet as it stands today is much lower than it's been.

Yes. Okay. So the thought on the revolver, we looked pretty, pretty carefully across the marketplace for similarly situated companies, meaning size and profitability. And the conclusion is kind of a one-time EBITDA threshold for revolver; sizing is quite consistent; that was the main thought behind it, and of course, extending that maturity for five years. On the leverage print again, we're pleased that the cash flow profile of the company is performing very much as we outlined in Investor Day, and we've consistently said all year long, north of $300 million of free cash flow, which is at a sphere of 50% free cash flow flow-through and again, much like we talked about. And so at 2.3 times that we keep going back to the same framework we talked about, which is capital allocation has leverage [ph], internal or organic investment back into the company, emphasis on both productivity investments and emphasis on innovative investments. Number two, of course, would be inorganic or M&A opportunities outside the company. And then the third would be returns of capital to shareholders. I think the key point there is, we believe that the right way to do that is each of those three compete for capital on a returns basis. So that philosophy or that framework continues.

Our next question is from the line of Jim Abbott with Barclays.

I wanted to touch on, maybe keeping with the theme of commodities and input costs. Back in late August, we had some news on Canadian tariffs on Chinese aluminum. I think your Canada business is quite small, but wondering what maybe the competitive impact of that would be? And you know, more generally, should tariffs become more prevalent ahead of -- or you know, after the election next week? How might that impact competitive environment more broadly in the U.S.? Thanks.

First of all, the Canadian tariff itself on aluminum has a de minimis impact to Reynolds Consumer Products, but all of us have a lot to learn about the tariff environment as it develops in the coming months. We're staying very close to it, and we'll see how it develops, but we have had experience in managing through care of challenges, successfully over the last several years.

And then, just one other quick question if I can. The legislation you were talking about in foam plate, can you expand on what exactly that is? And if legislation risk is potential or has potential in other categories? Thanks.

Yes. Some states and localities have banned the sale of foam, primarily in the West and the Northeast. Those are areas that are the lower foam use for, most of the foam is used in the middle of the country, and those remain in place without legislation.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from the line of Robert Ottenstein with Evercore.

Lance, you'll be sorely missed. Scott, Nathan, congratulations. I'd like to focus on the waste bag business. And I know that there's a lot of noise in the scanner data, and you mentioned easy comps for your competitor. But at least just kind of based on the most recent scanner, it does look like -- just in the data that we see that that you may be losing a little bit of market share, again, based on the numbers, and that your competitor may be increasing promos. So, love to get your thoughts if there's been any kind of change in the competitive environment there, or is this just kind of -- you know, statistical noise here? And then, somewhat related to that, you mentioned higher resin prices. Can you talk a little bit about when that will hit the P&L? And how you're thinking about offsetting them? Thank you.

Thanks, Robert. Thank you for that compliment. I'll take the first part of the question, which is the waste bag business, and turn over the resin pricing to Scott from a commodity cost standpoint. Our waste bag business is doing well. As I mentioned the prepared remarks, you know, the Hefty Waste & Storage business unit achieved record quarterly revenue in the third quarter, and our share is above 2022 levels. So at this point, we’re reading it at statistical anomalies occurring right now because of the comparison period. We believe the factors contributing to our gains over the years, the brand equity, our strategy and pricing, our product strength and reliability, and most importantly, our innovation will continue to drive the brand, and we're investing in all of those. So it's also worth to note as I talked about in our Q2 earnings call, that our total points of distribution have also increased for Hefty Waste bags. So we're very confident in the trends that we've had for the last 8 years, and Hefty Waste bags will continue and right now we’re -- we've got some comparison points in the numbers and statistics that make it very difficult to read.

On the commodity question, I think you asked about resin flow-through to P&L. I'd say typically, we would see changes in those underlying prices of resin flow-through the P&L, say in 3 to 4 months when we will assess our Q4 guide, of course, we contemplated that. And then in terms of the tools, as I mentioned in a previous question, really in the short-term, it's Reyvolution savings as our target focused to offset those headwinds. I think that'll remain the case.

[Operator Instructions] Our next questions come from the line of Peter Grom with UBS.

Lance, Scott, Nathan, congratulations. Good seeing you all. I just wanted -- a question on kind of category trends. And I know there were a lot of moving pieces this quarter, shipment timing. But when you think about the retail volume performance in the quarter, you know, maybe just touch on where things came in better, maybe were things more challenged? And then, as a follow-up to that, maybe asking Nik's question earlier, but just a bit differently. Just -- as we think about the 4Q guidance, it's still pretty wide range as it relates to retail volume. So, maybe -- can you just help frame the assumptions that would put you at the higher end versus the lower end in the fourth quarter here?

Well, as I mentioned in our prepared remarks and talked about some of the other Q&A, our category growth rates have been sequentially improving. They do vary depending on a specific category with a range of growth rates that are really very comparable to other household categories and staples. So we're seeing much of the same trends that a lot of other products in our proverbial aisle are also same in household standpoint but sequential improvement quarter-to-quarter, despite pressure on the consumers. And the second part of the question?

I think you're asking about just sort of the pacing range of the guide. I think the first place to start is just reminder, we looked at underlying retail volumes about flat for the full year, net of the effect of at a point of our product portfolio optimization. As -- I think we've said, you know, all along we see slight improvements sequentially, quarter by quarter. So the center cut of the guide for Q4 would be, again, a bit of a sequential pickup to plus one. And that's how we've been thinking about it. You know, all units generally developed about what we thought.

Our next question is from the line of Brian McNamara with Canaccord Genuity.

With weaker restaurant traffic and more meals consumed at home, given the macro environment. I guess we're a bit surprised that retail volumes weren't a little bit better in Reynolds Cooking & Baking specifically. I understand you expect further category improvement in Q4 but are there any dynamics there worth pointing out, whether it be timing or something else?

Let me start and Lance may add on it. It’s a good question. I think one of the things that's affecting what we saw on the Q3 print was the estimated $15 million of retail volumes pulled forward from Q2 to Q3, has a bit to do with the retailer promo timing, so I think that's really probably the biggest explanatory variable on print.

And I did mention that in my prepared remarks that we are seeing a modest increase from at home consumption. And I talked a little bit about what we're seeing from a holiday standpoint, which will also contribute to that.

Understood. And then at Investor Day back in March, I think the company expressed a belief that it’s categories will return to kind of low single digit volume growth next year, with the company expecting to outperform. Does that remain the expectation here given the management change and things like that, anything we should be aware of?

I think the commentary that we had offered is that the long-term algorithm would be low single digit growth. I think here in October 2024 we're not prepared to speak yet specifically to 2025, but you're correct in what we think of as the underlying category growth for the algorithm.

Thank you. At this time we've reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I'll turn the floor back to Lance Mitchell for closing remarks.

I'll just close by saying thank you to everybody. As I said earlier, we take a lot of time preparing our prepared remarks, as well as preparing for Q&A. We really appreciate the time that you take to listen and ask the questions. And I will tell you that this being my last earnings call, it's bittersweet to say thank you for your interest in RCP, and thank you for listening in today.

This will conclude today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines at this time.