Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Fourth Quarter 2023 Radian Group Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would like now to turn the conference over to John Damian, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Development. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and welcome to Radian's fourth quarter and year-end 2023 conference call. Our press release, which contains Radian's financial results for the quarter and full year was issued yesterday evening and is posted to the Investors section of our website at www.radian.com. This press release includes certain non-GAAP measures that may be discussed during today's call, including adjusted pretax operating income, adjusted diluted net operating income per share and adjusted net operating return on equity. A complete description of all of our non-GAAP measures may be found in press release Exhibit F and reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measures may be found in press release Exhibit G. These exhibits are available on the Investors section of our website. Today, you will hear from Rick Thornberry, Radian's Chief Executive Officer; and Sumita Pandit, Chief Financial Officer. Also on hand for the Q&A portion of the call is Derek Brummer, President of Radian Mortgage. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that comments made during this call will include forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual results to differ materially. For a discussion of these risks, please review the cautionary statements regarding forward-looking statements included in our earnings release and the risk factors included in our 2022 Form 10-K and subsequent reports filed with the SEC. These are also available on our website. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Rick.

Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us today. I am pleased to report another excellent quarter and to wrap up a successful year for Radian. For 2023, we increased book value per share by 15% year-over-year, generating net income of $603 million and delivering a return on equity of 15%. Despite a challenging macroeconomic environment, GAAP revenues grew to $1.2 billion in 2023. Our primary mortgage insurance in force, which is the main driver of future earnings for our company, reached an all time high of $270 billion. Radian Guaranty paid a total of $400 million in ordinary dividends, Radian Group, during the year. We returned $279 million of capital to stockholders through share repurchases and dividends. Our regular dividend yield continues to be the highest in the industry. Our overall capital and liquidity positions remain very strong. Available holding company liquidity at year-end was approximately $1 billion and our PMIERs cushion was $2.3 billion, an increase of $533 million from the prior year. Reflecting our strong financial performance and capital position, we received a ratings upgrade from S&P in January, to A minus for Radian Guaranty and BBB minus for Radian Group. Radian Group is now rated as investment grade by all three primary rating agencies. I would also like to highlight that as a result of our team's disciplined focus on managing costs during a challenging business environment, we reduced our combined consolidated cost of services and other operating expenses by 17% or $77 million in 2023 as compared to 2022, which was at the higher end of our target range for reductions. These results demonstrate the continued strength of our high quality and growing mortgage insurance portfolio and our capital position, as well as our ongoing strategic focus on managing operating expenses. In terms of…

Thank you, Rick, and good afternoon to you all. We produced another strong quarter of operating results in the fourth quarter of 2023, earning net income of $143 million or $0.91 diluted earnings per share. For the full year, we earned net income of $603 million or $3.77 diluted earnings per share. Adjusted diluted net operating income per share was slightly higher than the GAAP metrics at $0.96 for the quarter and $3.88 for the full year. We generated a return on equity of 15% in 2023 and grew our book value per share 15% year-over-year to $28.71. This book value per share growth was an addition to $146 million of dividends paid to our stockholders during 2023. We also repurchased $133 million of our shares during the year. And in 2023, we were proud to deliver an industry leading total shareholder return of 55%. Our revenues were strong in both the fourth quarter and full year 2023. Despite reduced mortgage and real estate transaction volumes during 2023 resulting from higher interest rates and limited housing inventory, we generated over $1.2 billion of total revenues during the year, a 4% increase compared to our total revenues in 2022. Slide 11 through 13 in our presentation includes details on our mortgage insurance in-force portfolio as well as other key factors impacting our net premiums earned. Our primary mortgage insurance in force grew 3% year-over-year to an all-time high of $270 billion as of year-end, generating $230 million in net premiums earned in the quarter and $909 million for the full year. As previously announced, Radian Guaranty entered into two new excess of loss reinsurance agreements in the fourth quarter that are expected to provide additional protection in stress loss scenarios. These agreements are consistent with our strategy to effectively manage capital…

Thank you, Sumita. Before we open the call to your questions, I want to highlight that we are pleased with our results and remain focused on executing our strategic plans. We are driving operational excellence across our businesses, and in 2023, we successfully reduced our combined consolidated cost of services and other operating expenses by 17% or $77 million. Our growing mortgage insurance portfolio, which reached an all-time high $270 billion, is highly valuable and expected to deliver significant earnings going forward. We continue to strategically manage capital. In 2023, we increased our PMIERs cushion by $533 million, paid $400 million of ordinary dividends from Radian Guaranty to Radian Group, and returned $279 million of capital to stockholders through dividends and share repurchases. Most importantly, we accomplished all of this working together as a One Radian team. I'd like to recognize and thank the dedicated and experienced team at Radian for the outstanding work they do every day. And thank you to our customers and investors for their continued support and confidence. And now operator, we would be happy to take questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Bose George with KBW. Your line is open.

Hey, everyone. Good afternoon. Actually, I wanted to ask first just about new notices. As your book season, the '21, '22, '23 books, do you think the new notices number continues to grow? And just what are your expectations there?

Hey, Bose, it's Derek. Thanks. Yeah, in terms of the development of the book, it's kind of playing out as expected and pretty favorably. So if you look at the notice development in Q4, if you look at that quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year increase, very similar to what we saw in 2022 Q4. Also, we saw which unlike Q4 '22, we actually saw cures increase in the most recent quarter. The other thing I would -- important to focus on is just not new defaults. Looking at the default rate, so the default rate continues to be at low levels at around 2.2%. That was actually flat last quarter. I think some of our competitors may have seen a bit of an increase. So that's been a positive development. The other thing we're seeing in new notices is significant embedded equity. Rick alluded to 82% of our defaults having at least 20% equity. And we continue to see that with new defaults. So in Q4, a little less than 80%. I think it was 78% of new defaults had at least 20% equity as well. So when we look at the book, kind of developing as expected and very favorably.

Okay. Great. That's helpful. And I just wanted to switch over to capital. You noted that dividends coming up to the holding company this year. How are you balancing return of capital versus what you might do in terms of your debt?

Yeah. And I think I gave some indication of what we are planning for both in my prepared remarks, but maybe just like breaking that down a little bit. So we are increasing our guidance of how much dividends we should be able to pay from dividend -- from Radian Guaranty to Radian Group. So instead of the $300 million and $400 million that we paid last year, we're increasing that guidance to $400 million to $500 million. We're still early in the year. So we are being conservative there. I think there's probably some upside to that number. But given that we are early in the year, we felt that our conservative guidance would be appropriate at this stage. In terms of balancing that with our debt, so again, I think I indicated in my prepared remarks that we are looking at opportunistically thinking about our options this year. Given our S&P ratings upgrade, the overall credit market, the fact that there are many other issuers looking to access the market this year, given the constructive credit environment, we would look to evaluate our options, we may consider reducing our debt this year. So I think all of that is on the table. But I think we don't have to make a choice between really thinking about our debt as well as thinking about our capital return. We are in the fortunate position where we have significant excess capital and liquidity in our holding company. I think Rick mentioned it's a little less than $1 billion. So I think we are in a really good place in terms of what we may want to do this year.

Okay, great. Thanks.

One moment for our next question. The next question comes from Doug Harter with UBS. Your line is open.

Thanks. Can you talk about the increase in ceded premiums this quarter? Were there any kind of onetime costs in there? Or is that a reasonable run rate as we think about heading into 2024?

Yeah. I think maybe if you want to just take a look at Slide 13, it gives you a little bit more detail on what is our ceded premiums by quarter. And I would say that there is no real onetime expense there. It is really driven by some of the risk distribution deals that we put in place in the last two quarters. And I think it's really a result of those risk distribution deals. So our ceded premium went up, just given the reinsurance deals that we put in place. I would also point to the positive of that. You saw that our RP miles buffer did go up. It is again attributed to the reinsurance deals that we put in place. So our buffer did go up by about $533 million. And that's the pros and con of thinking about this distribution. We've always said that we want to access risk distribution at the right cost of capital and at the right time, but it also comes with the prospect that our ceded premiums do go up when we have more reinsurance.

I guess along those lines, is the execution of those deals, one of the factors that allows you -- allowed you to increase your guidance on the dividends up to the holding company for the year?

Not at all. In fact, I would say that we kind of think about risk distribution pretty distinctly from how we manage our business day to day. When we underwrite new business, we are really doing that on the basis of the strength of our own capital. We don't need to do this distribution. We do it because it is appropriate and it gives us even more flexibility. But we do not think about our day-to-day pricing, on the premise that this distribution would be available to us. We've always said that we try to access the markets from a risk distribution perspective opportunistically. We do it when we like the cost of capital. So I think we've indicated last year that we've done reinsurance typically at the cost of capital of about 3.5% to 4.5%. At that cost of capital, we like distribution of that risk. But we do not really depend on risk distribution to think about our day-to-day underwriting.

Yeah. And also, just to add to that, so the dividend from Radian Guaranty, the Radian Group, is really largely driven through statutory earnings and our annual earnings. So to Sumita's point, we look at risk distribution from those perspectives, but the Radian Guaranty dividend to Radian Group is really driven by the strength of our earnings overall, the release of contingency reserves from prior period as we've talked about, providing positive [ph], surplus to create an ordinary dividend. And so one of the reasons why last year, when we first started to pay the ordinary dividend first time, I think, 15 years, something like that. That's now a recurring part of our capital structure based upon what we expect earnings to kind of develop as we go forward here. So pretty powerful piece, but the capital arbitrage and the opportunity through risk distribution is really something we take advantage of when we see value in it from a capital trade and a risk trade.

Great. Thank you.

Yeah, thank you, Doug.

One moment for our next question. The next question comes from Mihir Bhatia with Bank of America. Your line is open.

Hi, thank you for taking my questions. I wanted to start on Slide 18. I think you have a new disclosure in there about the claims resolved without a payment that are being included as yours. And I was curious, I guess, just a two-part question on that. One is, why -- are you trying to signal something with this? Do you expect this to increase? Obviously, in your prepared remarks, you talked about how much equity that is built in a lot of the new delinquency notices you are receiving. So maybe put this in a little bit of historical context for us, is this like -- just never not used to happen at any meaningful level as the numbers. I presume the numbers are increasing, given all the home price appreciation, et cetera, that we -- but, go ahead.

Yeah, Mihir, it's Derek. I mean the state we've been in has been a bit atypical, really for the last probably year and half to two years, in terms of the claim withdrawal. So if you look at it, for instance, our pending claim inventory, I think this most recent quarter, the cure rate was around 30%. So it's at the highest level it's been at ever. And that is driven in large part by continued strong macroeconomic environment, so employment, reemployment but most importantly, the embedded equity, right? So Rick, referring to that embedded equity in the portfolio. So it is resulting in a large number of claim withdrawals. And that's been pretty consistent with the trend we've seen for some time now.

Do you think these numbers like keep increasing the claims resolved without payment?

Well, in terms of the -- it kind of depends. I mean the base of defaults are going down, so that's going to kind of move that around. In terms of percentage, it is going to depend upon just the new defaults coming in the portfolio. To date, they've been coming in, in terms of embedded equity pretty close to the same level we've had. So I don't see on the horizon and moving down substantially. I think you'd probably need to see some home prices come down significantly. But where we are now is in a really good spot, because if you look at home price appreciation, some of that embedded equity was driven by double digit home price growth, which is good for the existing portfolio, but it puts a little pressure on the new business. Where we are right now, where we're seeing 5% to 6% home price appreciation is a pretty good spot. So that should continue to be positive in terms of new vintages as they move through default seasoning peak, they should be coming into default with some embedded equity, unlike past years where -- years ago where maybe you've seen 1% to 2% home price appreciation.

Got it. And then I wanted to maybe just talk a little bit about the good to hear about the upsized capital that you expect to be able to get out of the insurance subsidiaries. But what is the impact of that from a -- like, I mean, I guess, what is the plan for use of that? Is it -- can shareholders reasonably expect that a bulk of that capital distribution that's coming up is going to get returned to shareholders? Or is the thought that there are expansion opportunities to go invest or like whether it's M&A, whether it's invest more in homegenius, things like that. What is -- how should we be thinking about these upsized dividends?

Yeah. I think maybe just some context. If you just think about 2023, right, we had said we'll pay $300 million to $400 million of dividends, we returned $279 million of that. So $279 million of that $400 million went out as dividends and share repurchases last year. In fact, just in the fourth quarter, we bought back about $63 million of share. So I would say that we want to continue to be disciplined about it. But yes, a big part of that would probably go back to shareholders, a portion of that could be used towards debt. And I would say we would also evaluate other strategic opportunities. And maybe, Rick, do you want to add a few comments here.

Yeah. I mean, I would say just our history and our track record speaks for itself in terms of how disciplined we are about thinking about return to shareholders along with just kind of capital return in general. So I just kind of look at our track record of $1.9 billion over the last several years, returned through dividends and share buybacks. And I think we have the luxury of capital. Today, it's a good problem to have. And we have excess capital, when you look at PMIERs cushion within Radian Guaranty, you look at the capital flow of the Radian Group from Radian Guaranty and excess capital sits there. So Mihir, to your question, we're going to continue to be good stewards of capital. We're going to focus on opportunities to return capital to shareholders. We always talk about it in hindsight. We're always aware and alert to other strategic opportunities and thinking through a waterfall of capital allocation. And I think we've been really very disciplined about evaluating those opportunities. Sumita and I and John see dozens of them throughout the year, and we're really very quick to kill. But there are opportunities that could arise. And we're in a great situation with our excess capital situation to consider those, should they warrant consideration. So that's what I would say.

Okay. And then just my last question, just to touch base with regulatory developments. Is there anything that you're seeing that's coming down the pipeline that can maybe have a larger impact on your business, something that investors should be aware of? I know that the regulations are always changing, but I'm talking more like big things that could be coming down that investors probably worth paying attention to it. Just seems like the regulatory discussion around MI has been a little bit quiet for the last few quarters. So I just wanted to touch base to see where we are at on that. Thank you.

Yeah, Mihir, Derek, and I can kind of tag team on this one a little bit. But I would say, look, the good news is, as you say, it has been relatively quiet, I think, in terms of many different respects as it directly impacts us. But it's not been quiet as it relates to the kind of the broader mortgage market and you think about things like Basel III and the impact on banks from a participation in mortgage and all the discussion around that, other capital rules for independent mortgage banks. And there's a number of regulatory matters that are out there that don't directly impact us. In fact, the Basel III changes have actually created an opportunity for us from a conduit perspective that we just continue to kind of evaluate and kind of watch and participate in where appropriate. But I would say we're very close to it. There was a lot of chatter around FHA and different activities around that. I would say right now, we are in a little bit of a quiet period as it directly relates to MI. Would you agree, Derek?

Yeah, I would just add on the policy side is just the strength of the industry. And I think that's well recognized in terms of the financial strength, which you've seen kind of on the most recent rating upgrade and just how the industry has transformed from an industry that's really about aggregating and distributing risk. So much more resilient through the cycle. Also, when you look at it, I mean, we are private capital that helps an affordable and first-time home buyer segment. So from that perspective, we're in a really good spot kind of looking on both sides of the political aisle. So if you have changes kind of in terms of regulatory leadership, I think the industry is well placed.

Yeah. Thank you for taking my questions.

Yeah. Thank you, Mihir.

One moment for the next question. The next question comes from Scott Heleniak with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Yes. Well. First question I had was just on the expense ratio. You've made good progress on bringing that down for the year. And so you did -- you took a lot of costs out, you rightsized. Is the expectation that you could see further improvement in 2024? Or is it -- or the expense run rate kind of going to be stable from the run rate where you are right now?

Yeah. Thanks, Scott for that question. So I think as you saw in 2023, we had given initial guidance of $60 million to $80 million of cost savings, and we were able to achieve $77 million of cost savings in '23, which is about a 17% reduction in our cost of services and other operating expenses. You also heard us talk about the -- some of the cleanup activity that we completed in Q4, including writing of acquired intangibles. So I think from a balance sheet perspective, we really feel good about where we are starting this year from. I think the fourth quarter is a good indicator of the run rate going forward, excluding some of those onetime items. We are not giving specific expense guidance this year yet. I think we're still early in the year, and we took out about 17% of our expenses last year. So I would say that we're not giving a specific dollar guidance yet. But we're always looking to make sure that we are continuing to remain efficient. And we are looking at our expenses across our business lines. So I think that's an ongoing initiative, but we are not giving a specific dollar guidance of what that may look like for this year.

Okay. That's fair. And just switching gears to pricing. Can you just talk a little bit about what you've been seeing in the last few months, whether you're seeing any kind of major shifts at all in third quarter versus fourth quarter and into the year? And any thoughts on how you see that playing out in 2024?

Hi, Scott. This is Derek. Yeah, in terms of pricing, pretty quiet, which is a positive. So when we look at pricing in the industry, I would say, fairly flat really since our last call, which we view as a positive in the sense that I think the macroeconomic outlook has significantly improved. You're seeing home prices go up. I think there's a decreased probability of a soft landing. So to see price stay flat is very positive. The other thing I'd point out is that when you look at pricing, it's substantially above where it was in 2022. So when you go back year and half years to two years, our pricing is at higher levels, which we think is appropriate, looking at the risk through the cycle. So overall, I would say, pretty quiet quarter-over-quarter in terms of development.

Okay. Great. And then the last one, just on -- the average investment yield was 4.15 was similar to Q3. Is there any opportunity to get some higher yield and you expect to get that in the coming quarters? Or is it kind of -- do you feel like it's kind of stabilized where it is right now, the yield?

Yeah. I think we mentioned, Scott, in our quarterly call last quarter that we do see new money reinvestment rates are higher than our current yield. I think it takes a little while for it to actually come into our portfolio just given the size of our overall portfolio. So I would say maybe some upside but not a meaningful one from our current levels, given the overall interest rate backdrop that we have for 2024.

Okay, appreciate it.

One moment for our next question. The next question comes from Eric Hagen with BTIG. Your line is now open.

Hi, how are you guys? Within your outlook for -- I think I heard you say $300 billion to $350 billion of NIW this year for the market. Do you feel like there's any catalyst other than maybe lower interest rates, which could take it above that level?

So this is Rick. Thanks for your question, Eric. I think that range is based upon kind of an increase in purchase, the purchase origination market that's expected with kind of declining rates, obviously, with refinance is picking up a little bit. But I think the catalyst is demand being met by supply. And that's -- so I think right now, to the extent we saw supply become available because people began to list their home and start to retrade homes. You could see that purchase market expand. And because MI, especially for first time homebuyers, second, third time homebuyers, MI is more likely to be part of that transaction. That would be the other catalyst. So interest rates are going to provide a little bit. But right now, we're supply limited. And so to the extent supply could expand based on a variety of different factors, catalysts, construction, building. Those would be things that I think would enable the MI market to expand kind of similarly.

Maybe I can add a little bit also here. In terms of consumer behavior, I do think that people are getting just more used to a higher interest rate environment. And I think for a lot of potential homebuyers who were waiting for the interest rate to change, I think it's a good confluence of slightly lower interest rates, maybe not as great as what they had a few years back. But at some point, people need to go ahead and live their lives. So I do think that there is a consumer behavior aspect to it, as people get used to the current interest rates.

Yeah. That's a good perspective. I appreciate that. We got prepayment speeds from the GSEs this week. Any perspective you can share there on the high LTV loans out there. And even what your persistency rate might look like if mortgage rates were to drop from here?

Well, I mean, yeah, it's Derek. So in terms of looking at the outlook for persistency, which Rick kind of touched upon earlier, most of the portfolio is significantly out of the money from a refinance perspective. So when you kind of look at it, in terms of that interest rate movement, I think Rick and Sumita were alluding to the fact having rates go down, could be a positive in terms of kind of the origination side. Also, given a situation where your persistency still stays elevated because we have so much of the portfolio out of the money versus a typical situation where you have a bit of an interest rate dip, you might pick up originations, but then you have a lot of refi out of your portfolio. So we might be in a good spot if kind of rates kind of stay within kind of a certain corridor, let's say, within 100 to 150 basis points down. So I would say that I think there's a lot of stickiness to the portfolio. And it would take significant decreases in interest rates, which I don't think we're protecting or most third parties are projecting to see a significant pickup in prepayments.

Yeah. Is it a fair assumption that most of the borrowers with MI now, if they were to refi, they would require MI again? Or is there more flexibility for some folks you feel like?

Well, there's more flexibility. It just depends on the portfolio. And I think that has been -- you've seen that a little bit in kind of the penetration rate on the refinance side. The more recent vintages, there's going to be less embedded equity. So if you look at those who are closer to being in the money are going to be recent vintages like the last year, and they're going to have less embedded equity. So with respect to that versus the overall portfolio, there might be a higher probability that would have -- need mortgage insurance versus kind of some of the older vintages, but the older vintages that are so far out of the money. So you have to put that in perspective.

Sure. I appreciate, guys. Thank you.

Thank you.

I show no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back to Rick Thornberry for closing remarks.

Thank you. And I want to thank everybody for their participation and the really excellent questions. We appreciate the support that we received from all of you as our investors. And we look forward to meeting with you soon. And for those of you who are also Chiefs fans for the Super Bowl this weekend, I hope that you have a good weekend and for our 49ers fans, good luck as well. So that’s it. That’s all I got. Look forward to seeing you all on the road. Take care.

Thank you for participating. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.