Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI) Q4 2022 Earnings Report, Transcript and Summary

Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Rogers Communications Inc. Fourth Quarter 2022 Results Conference Call. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode and the conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to Paul Carpino, Vice President of Investor Relations with Rogers Communications. Please go ahead, Mr. Carpino.

Thank you, Ariel, and good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Today, I’m here with our President and Chief Executive Officer, Tony Staffieri; and our Chief Financial Officer, Glenn Brandt. Our call today will include estimates and other forward-looking information from which our actual results could differ. Please review the cautionary language in today’s earnings report and in our 2021 annual report regarding the various factors, assumptions and risks that could cause our actual results to differ. With that, let me turn the call over to Tony to begin.

Thank you, Paul and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us on this busy morning. When I stepped into the CEO role, one year ago, our performance had been lagging our peers and we had lost our leadership footing. Last year we set a clear plan to reestablish our leadership position and to deliver sustained strong results. This included a renewed focus on the fundamentals and a significant improvement in execution. In short, we set a plan to turn around our performance. 12 short months I am pleased to share we made significant progress and we did it with a backdrop of a lingering pandemic and new executive team and one of the largest proposed mergers in Canadian history. Despite these challenges, we did not get distracted. And we remain focused on driving better execution across our entire business. As a team, we made tremendous strides. But we have much more opportunity in front of us. I have to say I am pleased with the speed and magnitude of our turnaround. Across critical valuation metrics such as financial growth, and customer share gains we went from consistently ranking second or third against our competitors over the past few years to now ranking first on the vast majority of these important metrics throughout the year. Our turnaround wasn’t about coming out of a pandemic. It was about instilling a performance based culture focused on our customers returning to growth and outperforming the market. In 2022, the whole market grew slightly more than prior years. But we grew even more. In wireless we went from losing market share just a few years ago to now industry leading share of mobile phone net additions. The momentum you saw in the first three quarters carry through into the fourth quarter and contains the power forward into 2023. Importantly, we met our upgraded guidance for the year and set a strong foundation for growth in 2023. For the full year, we delivered strong total service revenue growth of 6% and adjusted EBITDA growth of 9%; the highest growth in over a decade. And the improvements we delivered in 2022 were reflected in our total shareholder return, which was up 9%. By comparison, our two national competitors had negative returns of minus 4% and minus 8% and the TSX and Dow Jones were down as well: 5% and 7% respectively. In wireless postpaid mobile phone net additions were 193,000 in the fourth quarter, up 37% from last year. The team executed exceptionally well in Q4. And we delivered the best Black Friday in our company’s history. For the full year, we added 634,000 mobile phone net adds postpaid plus prepaid our strongest result in 15 years, and the best performance in our industry. In cable, we continue to see very aggressive in market promotional activity from our main competitor. And although revenue was flat, we delivered positive adjusted EBITDA despite investments in key areas including customer service. Here we see opportunity improve our customer share performance, and we have confidence that our product set and in particular, internet and TV have a competitive advantage across our entire footprint and our recent heightened investments in cable will begin to yield market share growth this year. In media, we delivered a strong fourth quarter and full year. In 2022 we grew revenue by 15% and turned $127 million of losses into $69 million of profit. Our media performance clearly stands out in the industry reflecting the quality of our assets and the team’s execution capability. Importantly these results did not come at the expense of investment. In 2022, our team invested a record $3.1 billion in capital, the vast majority of which is now in networks. In fact, a doubling of where we were several years ago in network investment. Looking ahead to 2023, we continue to see healthy growth catalysts supporting our businesses from factors such as healthy population growth, penetration headroom, and the benefits our transition to 5G technologies will bring. And against this backdrop of healthy growth, we expect to continue leveraging our execution momentum to drive leading share of customer growth, which will fuel robust organic growth in both total service revenue and adjusted EBITDA as you saw this morning in our full year guidance release. You will also see that free cash flow will continue to grow as well as we deliver another year of record investment in our customers and our networks. In fact, in 2023, we have allocated an incremental $700 million of our CapEx envelope towards ensuring we continue to have the best wireless and wireline networks. As I reflect on the year, I am proud of our entire team for their relentless focus, disciplined execution firm commitments to our customers’ shareholders. While there is clearly more work to do, we have reestablished momentum. Before I turn it over to Glenn let me provide a brief update on Shaw. As you heard last week, the Federal Court of Appeal reaffirmed the decision of the competition tribunal. Two federal courts have now unanimously and decisively ruled in favor of these pro-competitive transactions, namely the sale of freedom to Quebecor and the sale of Shaw to Rogers. To quote the tribunal decision, there will continue to be four strong wireless competitors in Alberta and British Columbia. And the decision goes further concluding that Quebecor will be a more disruptive wireless carrier, and Rogers will inject a new and substantial source of competition. Given the matters before the federal government for final approval, we will not provide any further comment at this time. Let me now turn the call over to Glenn.

Thank you, Tony. And good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us this morning. I know it’s a busy morning. Rogers industry leading fourth quarter and full year results reflect the company’s commitment to better execution, combined with continued investment in our networks. In wireless, fourth quarter service revenue was up a very healthy 7%. This reflected higher roaming revenue as global travel continued to recover as well as a postpaid phone subscriber base which has consistently led on market share and growth throughout 2022. The wireless market in Canada is healthy and competitive. And our better execution is allowing us to grow share once again. Our loading was very strong as we added 193,000 postpaid net additions, reflecting a 37% increase from one year ago. Loading was particularly robust during the Black Friday and boxing week promotional periods. And we achieved record Black Friday loading with strength continuing through to the end of the quarter. As we have seen all year, our results have been driven by better execution, growth in our unlimited plans, increases in immigration, and the continuation of customers embracing the diversified value plans Rogers provides across Canada. Through the very active Q4 promotional period, postpaid mobile phone churn was also higher, again reflecting a very competitive Canadian wireless industry with consumers very aware of the peak promotional periods and the available pricing and value alternatives. As a result of this increased activity churn for the fourth quarter came in at 1.24% compared to 1.06%, one year ago. ARPU for the quarter was 58.69 up 1% benefiting from consumers continuing to travel. We exited Q4 with roaming revenues at 140% of pre-pandemic levels. And we’re just over 84% of pre-pandemic roaming traffic volume. Wireless adjusted EBITDA up a solid 8% reflecting excellent flow through from our service revenue growth, with adjusted EBITDA service margins coming in at over 63%. Moving to our cable business. Total revenue was stable and unchanged from one year ago. While adjusted EBITDA was up 1% reflecting tighter cost performance. Cable adjusted EBITDA margin was 51%, which is up 60 basis points from a year ago. As Tony has noted, the fourth quarter continued to be a very aggressive and promotionally intense period in the wireline market led by our national peer. We were largely measured and balanced in our competitive response, matching competitive offers were appropriate while seeking to maintain underlying profitability wherever possible, versus driving loading. Gross ads remained strong while customer churn remains elevated reflecting that promotional activity. The market is competitive. On a product bases, we delivered 7,000 retail internet net customer additions in the fourth quarter, down from one year ago, again reflecting the highly promotional environment. Additionally, we continue to make significant investments in our cable network spending $235 million in cable network infrastructure alone in Q4. In our media business our results continued to reflect the quality of our sports and media assets with strong top line and bottom line results in Q4. Revenue was up 17% driven by better content rates, a revenue distribution benefit from major league baseball and higher advertising revenue in the quarter. This drove strong profitability, with adjusted EBITDA of $57 million and $83 million turnaround from the $26 million loss in the same quarter last year, which as you’ll recall, was affected by COVID on live sports. At a consolidated level Q4 service revenue grew by 6% and adjusted EBITDA grew by 10%. Capital expenditures were $776 million and free cash flow excluding Shaw financing costs were $644 million. I should add, our deposit interest income is roughly covering our 4.2% weighted average coupon on our $13 billion cash held on reserve for the Shaw bond financing. We achieved our 2022 guidance range despite the $150 million credits paid to customers in the third quarter. On a consolidated basis for the full year, total service revenue grew over 6% and e adjusted EBITDA increased by almost 9%. Capital expenditures came in at approximately $3.1 billion and free cash flow for the year excluding Shaw financing was $2.0 billion; all meeting guidance. This performance is a clear demonstration that we are growing top line and bottom line and reinvesting these profits aggressively and increasingly back into our networks for Canadians. Importantly, these results also show we are in a strong position operationally and financially as we prepare to integrate with Shaw. Succinctly we are ready for when we received the final regulatory approval. Turning to the balance sheet. At December 31, we had $4.9 billion of available liquidity, including $460 million of cash on hand and cash equivalents and a combined $4.4 billion available under our revolving bank credit facilities. We also held $12.8 billion in restricted cash and cash equivalents that will be used to partially fund the cash consideration of the Shaw transaction when that closes. Our weighted average cost of all borrowings was 4.5% as at December 31, 2022. And our weighted average term to maturity was 11.8 years. Our debt leverage ratio at quarter end excluding the Shaw financing was 3.1 times compared to 3.4 times at December 31, 2021. As previously discussed until we close the Shaw transaction, we use adjusted net debt which excludes the Shaw financing and related cash held in reserve to analyze our debt and calculate leverage. The Shaw related senior notes, derivatives and restricted cash and cash equivalents associated with the transaction financing have been issued for the specific purpose of funding the acquisition which of course is not yet closed. In terms of our outlook for the coming year, we continue to see strong momentum in our business and we have provided a robust outlook for 2023. Our 2023 outlook includes strong top line, bottom line and free cash flow growth, along with continued emphasis on investing in our networks, focused in particular on network reliability and customer service. 2022 has been a year of remarkable turnaround which will continue into 2023. We are executing well and our outlook reflects this. We anticipate total service revenue growth in the range of 4% to 7% and adjusted EBITDA growth in the range of 5% to 8%. These growth metrics continue to build on the industry leading organic growth we delivered in 2022. We are also continuing with our commitment to invest in our networks in 2023. Our anticipated 2023 capital expenditures excluding Shaw integration costs will be in the $3.1 billion to $3.3 billion range. We anticipate free cash flow excluding Shaw integration will grow in 2023 ranging from $2.0 billion to $2.2 billion. As we head into 2023 we are monitoring the economic environment for signs of economic pressures. But we believe our execution is sound and we are managing effectively through the overall economic and business climate. Once we receive approval for the Shaw transaction, we will provide an update to our guidance, which will reflect the combination of these two strong and healthy organizations. But in the meantime, you can see that our underlying business is performing well and that we have not nor will become distracted. In summary, we are very pleased with our results in Q4 and for 2022. These results reflect the Rogers team’s ability to make the necessary changes in the business and deliver better execution. And our teams did both of these very well without distraction. 2022 was not perfect and we know we have more work to do. But we have the right team in place and have established a much improved cadence for delivering more consistent and leading results. Thank you for your interest and attention this morning. And with that, Ariel, can you please commence with the Q&A.

Certainly. We will now begin the question and answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Vince Valentini of TD Securities. Please go ahead.

Yes, thanks very much. The guidance you’ve given looks impressive, by the way and good fourth quarter, I should add it. Can you clarify what you’re doing with your wireless ARPU assumptions since there are a lot of moving pieces with roaming and potentially new competition? Would you be assuming positive wireless ARPU growth within the service revenue and EBITDA guidance you provided?

You will see continued those slowing growth in ARPU coming from roaming. You will see continued emphasis on our customers upgrading to unlimited plans and premium plans and so that will have a positive impact on our ARPU events. So yes, you’ll see that revenue growth will also be flowing through ARPU.

And just to clarify Glenn that the new guidance assuming you get the deal done, do we have to sort of wait until your next scheduled call in April with Q1 results? Or are you planning some sort of interim investor event to showcase what pro forma looks like?

I think Vincent in fairness, let me not presume timing of when that will come and get ahead of our skis. We will be ready when we get clearance. But let me not guess when that will come relative to our next earnings release or prior. I don’t want to be presumptuous, and I don’t want to speak on behalf of others that the files on their desk.

Our next question comes from Maher Yaghi of Scotiabank. Please go ahead.

Thank you for taking my questions. Good morning, and congratulations on good results. Especially for the guidance, which is in within the current environment is impressive. But I did want to ask you a question related to the overall wireless market. We’re starting to see deceleration of wireless service, revenues and unsubscribe loading in the U.S. And some of that is coming from reduction in enterprise and the business segment. Now, Canada is a different beast, for sure. We’re seeing a lot of immigration. But can you talk a little bit about your expectation for wireless in ‘23? And are you seeing any deceleration of your business segments, which could, put some cap on how much further growth we can see in subscriber loading?

Thanks for the question, Maher. As you stated, in your comments, Canada is slightly different than the U.S. macro environment owing to a couple of things that have helped us on the wireless side from a market perspective in ‘22 which we expect to continue into ‘23. And we’ve talked about them before. But notably, the level and pacing of immigration continues to be strong. When we look at foreign students and temporary workers, that pacing continues to be strong as well. And importantly, the penetration levels in Canada continue to have headroom. And so as we head into ‘23, we’re not foreseeing downward pressure on those. And with respect to the business, what we have seen is proportionately the business segment, and a particular small business has continued to grow in line with the consumer and those trends that I just talked about. And so, as we looked at ‘23, we continue to see a fairly healthy backdrop. If you look at the overall wireless market, total number of subscribers for the market seems to have grown in ‘22 by just over 5%. And one of the healthiest growth rates we’ve seen in a long time. And so our expectation is that we’ll continue to see healthy growth in ‘23, may not be as high as ‘22, because there is a bit of the post pandemic catch up we believe that happened earlier in the year. But as we look for the rest of the year, we continue to see opportunity for that growth.

Also Maher on the guidance you see it reflects that population growth. You asked specifically about the business market, as you know, I think in the business market, we have an opportunity to continue to increase our share in that market. But I think if you look at our service, revenue guidance, 4% to 7% is reflective of those general trends of population growth. So we’re not out of line. Sorry to cut you off.

Thank you for that increased information. But I wanted to ask you in terms of the operational performance, and Tony since you came in, you implement the changes. We’re seeing the benefits on the bottom line. Can you talk a little bit what’s the next step in your overall view of how to keep improving operations even further from here? What should we be looking for in terms of changes that we could see as Rogers beyond what’s happening with the Shaw?

It’s a good question Maher and what you saw this year, when I say this year and 2022, was a rebalancing back to the fundamentals of our business which has been, quite frankly, let’s ensure we have the best network and ramp up investment in our wireless and wireline network combined with improvements in the customer experience. And as we head into ‘23 and we look at the industry, what you’ll continue to see is improvements in our network that are tangibly visible to our consumers and business customers. That’s important to us. And secondarily, when we think about customer service, we think about the customer experience and as an industry, as technology continues to evolve, we see the opportunity to continue to make things simpler for our customers, and continue on the agenda of resiliency and redundancy of our network. And so they need connections that can trust that are always on. And those are the themes that you’ll continue to hear us focus on and we believe that’s going to be the fundamental catalyst to continue to have leading market share, as we head into ‘23 that will convert to the financials that you see. it’s as simple as that in our mind Maher.

Our next question comes from Drew McReynolds of RBC. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Just extending on the previous question, maybe starting with you, Tony, specifically, on the cable side, I think everyone’s kind of well aware of the strategy there, and getting that circuit back on, on its feet post outage. But also in anticipation of a broader transaction, it could be in a transition, just wondering what your expectations are on the cable side for Rogers stand alone as we at least start the beginning of the year here. And then secondly, for you Glenn just an update on my end on the balance sheet, assuming the deal closes. Obviously, there’s been with the passage of time, some delivering evolving market conditions, etc. Just, would love to hear how you’re seeing delivering post deal close over the next two to three years, just relative to what you’ve previously indicated, if there’s any change there. Thank you.

Thanks for the question Drew. In terms of the cable side of the business, think about it in two points. One is the backdrop, will accelerate growth. We saw very good growth in the market size in wireless. And there’s a bit of a lag is that translates to new home construction and homes past in our cable business. So we see that fueling a growth in homes past that will be combined with additional investments will put into homes past. So we see the opportunity and high likelihood for the size of the market for us to continue to grow. And as we retool some of the fundamentals in that business, our expectation is you will see largely in the back half of ‘23 but starting to see early signs in Q1 and more so in Q2 improvements in subscriber market share. You see in the fundamentals of retooling of the business in terms of bringing in simplicity in our operations. We’ve actually invested more in customer experience than we have in any previous year, yet our overall cost structure has come down for cable and that’s really a reflection of that transformation to the fundamentals in that business. We’ve also at the same time and we’ve talked about this on previous calls, are re-indexing from our Flanker Fido internet, back to the Rogers main brand. It’s a much better customer experience in terms of a better modem, and a whole bunch of things related to that. And you see that when we look at the churn in the Flanker product versus our main brand. Rogers Internet has substantially by a wide margin lower churn than Fido internet. So what you see us is trying to move to the more value add brand for us of Rogers. And we’ve been making that change. In the short term our main competitor has launched, I would describe aggressive, competitive promotional pricing, especially in the higher tiers of one gig and above, which is fine, we’ll compete with that. But as Glenn said in his opening remarks, our response to that will be very measured at the right time in terms of competing on that basis. But right now, there were a few things we wanted to focus on in the fundamentals in that business and so that’s what you’re seeing play out and how we think about our outlook for this year.

And then Drew in terms of the Shaw transaction and our balance sheet, when we received the regulatory approval, and close on Shaw, I’ll start with we have all of the permanent funding in place to close. We have $13 billion in cash held in reserve from the proceeds from our $13 billion in bond issues from last March 2022. That those bonds, as you’ll all recall, are in place and extended out through to being available through the year end ‘23. So we have plenty of runway there. We also have $6 billion in committed bank term loans, with terms ranging from three to five years, split evenly across three, four and five years. So that takes our cash funding up to $19 billion dollars available. And then there is a portion of the purchase price, of course, it’s done in shares for the Shaw family. And then finally, there will be proceeds that come in, from the transaction into Shaw communications before we close from Shaw’s sale of Freedom to Quebecor and so all of that netted together, we have all of the funding in place to close the transaction and meet all of our liquidity needs through the year without touching the $4.9 billion of liquidity I mentioned we had on hand at year end. So the balance sheet is strong in terms of corporate funding. We will meet all of our maturities and Rogers specific commitments as well as being able to close on Shaw without needing to come back to the capital markets. In terms of where we will be on leverage when we close, we’ll be right around five times maybe a tick over five times when we close depending upon timing. We’ve taken advantage of the time that we’ve had to have strong organic growth within the Roger standalone business. We have had some expenses come in along the way, which we now have to cover on our balance sheet, not the least of which was the cost of extending those bonds because we did not close in ‘22. Even with those added expenses coming in, we will still be closing right around five times, low five times when we close on the transaction I anticipate and then going forward, we haven’t given a forecast as to schedule around delivering. But if you look at where our EBITDA rolls up with Shaw’s EBITDA and then you look at where our path is on synergies, I think you’ll see through earnings growth alone, we generate some significant de-levering on an annual basis. I don’t know if you’re looking for a rough rule of thumb, think of it in the range of probably 0.4 to 0.6 times depending upon the year depending upon how much of the year we have left in ‘23 once we close. But if you were to try and model it along those lines, Drew, I think you’d probably be in the ballpark. And then free cash flow in the outer years, maybe not in the first 12 months. But we will have available free cash flow to nominally pay down debt as well. That’s about as fulsome as I want to get right now, but that’ll give you an idea how to model it.

Our next question comes from Sebastiano Petti of JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Just sticking with the cable network investments and competition themes you did mention in your prepared remarks that the fourth quarter was aggressive and promotional intensity from your national peer. But at the same time, I think Tony, you mentioned that you expect perhaps market share trends to improve in 1Q and 2Q. So in the near term basis, if you can maybe unpack some of the drivers there, you expect within the first and second quarter team to lead to the better subscriber market share. That would be great. And then maybe a longer term question. And in the U.S. you’re seeing your larger peers, charter, Comcast talk about versus 4.0 upgrade path, obviously, you are largely going to follow the Comcast paths. But they have outlined the goal to get the DOCSIS 4.0 by 2025, pretty much ubiquitously across their footprint. What does that mean for Rogers? While market share trend may improve over the next couple of quarters relative to [Indiscernible] they are continuing on their fiber path, assuming the transactions with Shaw closes here shortly, obviously tell us pretty formidable in terms of cyber overlap as well. And just maybe give us a view on how Rogers is thinking about the long term HFC DOCSIS 4.0 upgrade paths, and maintaining competitiveness relative to your fiber peers. Thank you.

Thanks for the questions Sebastiano. Two parts to your question. The first is now as we look to ‘23 and I just want to clarify as we talk about market share improvements. I just want to reiterate and level set expectations that it will be a progressive ramp in ‘23 a little bit in the first quarter ramping to the second quarter and then into the back half. And so I just want to just make sure we’re not getting too far ahead of ourselves. In terms of the fundamentals that get us there we’re very focused on the customer experience, and are they getting reliable internet at speeds that they want. We’re less focused on a price battle. What we do know is you can sign on a customer at a very low ARPU. But in the end, if they’re getting experience they’re not happy with, then that is the primary reason for change. We continually look at the market reasons for customers coming on board, reasons for customers leaving and across the industry and that’s true both Canada and U.S. while price is always important a more important factor is the internet reliability. And that’s because we just even in the consumer space with a lot of work from home, it’s become so critical. And so those fundamentals around customer experience is what we believe will in the long term continue to drive the right gross add in the right churn fundamentals. So that’s point one. Second point relates to DOCSIS 4. Let me be clear, we do not have a competitive disadvantage in our internet business. In fact, we see it as a competitive advantage. In our footprint, we’ve been deploying fiber all the way to the home, all the way to the business premise for over a decade. And so we have robust, complete fiber to the prem throughout our footprint, and where it is, and we still have coax in the last mile. We’re in the fortunate position that coax in the last mile continues to deliver speeds that are well beyond customer demand at this stage. We’re offering at least one to one and a half gigs across our entire footprint. 99% of our footprint is capable of those speeds. And in many areas, that’s now two and a half gigs and growing rapidly. The migration to DOCSIS 4 will only enhance the top end of those speeds. And we expect that to come as a fast follow, if not in line with where you see our U.S. peers going on DOCSIS 4. The biggest limiting factor and you’ve heard that from them, I suspect are the chipsets that support the DOCSIS 4. But we’re extremely comfortable that as we looked at ‘24 and ‘25 deployment for DOCSIS 4, that will still be well ahead of where the market demand is. So we have plenty of capacity, plenty of headroom to meet the customer expectations as we move to DOCSIS 4 but again, that’s for that portion of our network where the cost effectiveness of coax in the last mile continues to be very compelling.

Our next question comes from David Barden of Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys, thanks so much for taking the questions. So, I guess like, I want to talk a little bit about the merger. And congrats on getting this far the process and your success there. The first question would be, given that it’s been probably a year longer than we thought, given what we’ve watched happen, with at least down here and charter and LTs, and their response to fiber overbuild. Are the synergies of this merger that you articulated two years ago, at a billion dollars still real? And how do you think about the CapEx requirements of the absorbing Shaw in the future? That’d be one. And then the second one would be not to put you in a tough spot, but really to put you in a tough spot, which is you’re making the arguments that Kevin Corp, and whatever you’ve done, your agreements with them, it’s going to make them a more effective competitor in the Canadian wireless market, which sounds like a terrible thing if you’re an equity investor in Rogers. Can you square that for me in the market like why is the net of these two things you’ve given up to create a better competitor and Kevin Corp, less than the benefit that I’m going to get from being an investor in the benefits of the Shaw cable merger synergies? I just need a refresher on how this all makes me excited about the Rogers transaction.

I will start and Glenn will fill in on some additional points. But as we look to and we’ve continually assessed throughout how our investment thesis on the Shaw transaction compares to what we thought, and I think there’s two things that I would describe at a macro level. Firstly, on the cost synergies, the additional time, has allowed us to, as I mentioned earlier, make progress on retooling our own Shaw. And so we will be entering that transaction from a position of greater clarity on our cost structure and our cost roadmap. And so a very macro level, we have heightened confidence on the synergy benefits. The second piece, and we haven’t talked about it much, if at all, are the revenue synergies. On this time we did the deal, we look at the Canadian population in particular, where Shaw has its primary cable markets and that growth is more than we had expected when we looked at it two years ago, owing to those factors that are driving our own cable market growth that I mentioned earlier. A number of other factors as well. But if we step back and look at those two primary factors, the investment thesis not only continues to hold, but in our view, continues to improve with the passing of time. The second part of your question relates to having a fourth wireless competitor. We have thrived in a competitive landscape in the past, including in 2022. We’ve entered into transactions that will allow the buyer of freedom to enhance their competitive ability. And it’s over to us and we’re confident we have what we need to be able to compete in a four player market just as we’ve done in the past. And it’s all going to be about relative share. And in four player market there are a number of dynamics. And so when you talk about the impact, it isn’t necessarily anything that a fourth player picks up is at the expense of Rogers. There are dynamics and market share and we’re comfortable as I said that we have what we need to be able to compete for share in that space.

And then Dave, maybe if I could just add in a little bit more on you asked on synergies and capital expenditures. As Tony has mentioned, we’ve had more time to look at the synergies, we remain committed to that. Tony’s touched on that. The capital expenditure piece. The plan, the model, the forecast hasn’t changed from our initial evaluation of the transaction. I think, fundamentally, if you look at Shaw communications and how it operated its wireline and its wireless business over the last few years, a significant portion of its capital spend has gone into the wireless side of that balance sheet and investing in their build out of their wireless infrastructure. We have a strong national wireless network that we already have well in hand, in terms of investing. Our acquisition of Shaw is an acquisition of the wireline side of their business. We will take Shaw communications, annual capital spend, and devote it to wireline assets in the West succinctly. And so if you work on that premise, you can I think, ladder up to what that business plan looks like and how it forecasts out. But in a nutshell, that’s how we prepare for taking in Shaw and the capital spend related to Shaw. It will be focused on wireline investing in the West to go along with what we’re already doing in our core business today. I think Tony answered the rest of it.

The next question is from Tim Casey with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thanks. A few for me. One, just a clarification, Glenn. Just on that CapEx comment. Are you implying that you’ll spend the billion dollars a year in Western Canada or notionally the 700 that they’ve spent on wireline?

I’m not going to get into the close specifics yet Tim. We’re in 2023. I’ve given our guidance for ‘23 standalone. We’ll see when we close the transaction before I start telling you what numbers we’re going to spend on Shaw in year. But we will invest in the wireline networks to invest in customer service, across our entire footprint. And once we take in Shaw, that entire footprint will go from coast to coast. We will invest as needed. And that’ll be an investment program that’s done over the years, not over months.

A couple of questions for Tony, and one for you, Glenn. Tony, can you talk a little bit about the wireless loading dynamics in the quarter in the outlook? I mean, you had a very successful loading quarter, but our proven churn did, were affected. I mean, were you more active on the Flanker brands, perhaps in anticipation of a Freedom at Quebecor. Can you just talk about the competitive dynamics within the brands in the quarter? And then just curious if you could comment on some of the media signaling coming out of chairperson each of these at the CRTC and focused on pricing again. Just wondering if you’ve had any dialogue or any comment many of us have heard this kind of signaling before, it just would be interested in your perspective. And lastly, Glenn, just a clarification on the media number. It looks like there’s a onetime BAM contribution in the fourth quarter. Could you confirm that and perhaps quantify it? Thank you.

Thanks to Tim for the questions. A couple of things is just to give you some context on the fourth quarter, quite a bit of competitive intensity in terms of promotional activities, not just on the price plans, but to some extent on the handsets as well. So what you saw play out and we were largely more reactive in terms of the Flanker. In fact, when you look at over the course much like on home internet, we’ve been re-indexing back to our premium plan. And if you’re looking at the rate of growth in the fourth quarter of Rogers viz-a-viz Fido what you see is a significantly faster rate of growth on Rogers. And so we’re pleased with that on balance. So notwithstanding that competitive intensity. We continue to make good traction on re-indexing back to our premium brand and something we’ve been on throughout 2022 and we’ll continue to do in ‘23. But no doubt some of the value out there, and it’s just a reflection of the market. There was good value for consumers in the fourth quarter and the overall impact on service revenue was offset by share gains, which is important in a market where the rate of growth is accelerating. And so we’re always trying to balance off both of those. And I think we are striking the right balance between market share gains, and ARPU growth as well. And so that’s what really reflected the heightened churn that you saw in Q4 for us and the industry. In terms of your second question, on pricing. Well there’s not a lot I could say, with respect to the new CRTC chair. We look forward to working constructively and proactively at the right time with the mandate of the CRTC as we would with any other regulatory body. But what I will say is, we feel good about the market dynamics and the value add that the industry and Rogers is bringing to customers. It’s a continue to highlight against the backdrop of increasing inflation in a number of parts of the sector and consumer goods. Our industry in Rogers continues to reduce pricing. If you were to look at it over the last several years, and in particular, over 2022, one of the few if not the only sector that actually has price declines in the marketplace, and that’s owing to the competitive intensity that’s out there. And frankly, as I’ve said in other forums are intend to continue to figure out ways to bring more value add to customers

And then, Tim, just quickly on your question around the MLB proceeds. It’s not my transaction to release the details on. And so I can’t give you a specific amount. It does relate to MLB, having sold the minority interest in the remaining minority interest in held in one of its properties, and then the distribution to each of the teams. And so that was our, we recorded our share of it in the quarter.

Our next question comes from Simon Flannery of Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

You’ve talked a little bit about revenue synergies, and one of the things we’re seeing in the U.S. is the rise of the double play, the internet plus wireless bundle, and triple play bundle kind of declining over time. Perhaps you could just give us a little bit of a sense of how you see that in Ontario? What sort of performance you see having being able to offer that combination to your customers? What percentage of your cable base does have your wireless product? And how do you see the opportunity to bring that playbook to Western Canada? Thanks.

Thanks for the question, Simon, I’ll start and Glenn will pick up. At a very macro level. We’ve, we’ve been watching that trend closely in the U.S. In Canada, because we’ve had, I would say more experience at it having been a cable and wireless operator in significant parts of the country for a long period of time. In terms of the bundling, it’s largely been a price dynamic in terms of enticing the customer to it. When you look at the actual by dynamic in many ways, the channel distribution is different in how the customer buys, and a number of other factors in terms of the decision making criteria and how they think about them. And so other than promotional incentives to bundle them, I would say the fundamentals of the business seem to be continue to be somewhat separate. And so we’ll continue to capitalize on that coming together at the right time. But price alone isn’t the answer long term and it really gets back to the comments I gave earlier with respect to long term cable churn rates. So we continue to watch that trend and certainly it’s an opportunity for us in terms of bundling. We don’t disclose the specifics of, within our footprint, what that looks like in terms of bundled offering for competitive reasons. But I would say it is growing, but perhaps not as much as you might think.

Then maybe the only thing I would add to that Simon is our Ignite offering is particularly attractive as people’s viewing habits turn towards streaming to help still provide a base upon which to sell our video service product. It is a very strong offering that allows people to access streaming as well as the traditional channel lineups very conveniently. So that does help as well.

And what’s the call out on the video numbers in the quarter?

I think we’ve touched on what I think the priorities were it was a consistent, it is a very competitive market, it remains competitive going into ‘23. And I don’t think there’s really anything more to call out than that.

Our next question comes from Stephanie Price of CIBC. Please go ahead.

On 5G, can you talk a little bit more about the 5G rollout and the 5G mid band coverage targets you have and what you’ve seen in terms of an uptick in customers moving to higher tier plans once you’ve deployed it? And finally, how you think about network costs if you operate both 4G and 5G networks in the near term?

Thanks for the question, Stephanie. In terms of 5G rollout, as you saw on previous calls, we were very quick out of the gate very early in the year to deploy the mid band spectrums as you referenced very quickly. As of today we’re sitting at approaching 85%. We’re at about 83% today in terms of 5G coverage. And so we continue a very aggressive ramp. And you can expect that as we head towards the end of the year that will approach 90%. So we continue to deploy that spectrum very quickly. And in many markets, you’ll see the banner 5G Plus much like you do in the U.S. and that will continue to be at a very rapid pace as well. So that’s all proceeding well.

I think in terms of the network costs, Stephanie, think of it in the context of the higher band spectrum carries more data. 5G service users consume more data. On a per gig basis, you need the mid and higher bands. And we’ll need those as we move into the years to come to carry the data. But the capital investment in that spectrum and getting it into our towers that, think of that as being the network costs associated with 5G. They are fixed costs, largely they’re the capital spend that we put into spectrum into infrastructure. And those were the fixed costs that you don’t see in the margins. You see them below the EBITDA line in terms of our capital spending. Once we get them out there, we deploy them and we can run services out to our customers.

Our next question comes from Jerome Dubreuil of Desjardins. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my questions. Two for me. The first one is on cable. I would like to get a an update on the percentage of your cable network that overlaps with fiber to the premises. And then second question on wireless. Great postpaid adds, again. Would you agree that now a larger proportion of wireless subscriber growth comes from a bit of a lower end of the market? And if yes, what does that mean, in terms of the strategy to adopt to go to market? Thank you.

Thanks for the question, Jerome. I’ll start with the second part. And then Glenn will come back to the cable question. In terms of the wireless as you think about new to Canada as a student migration. Certainly that segment would index first to the Flanker brands and we’re certainly seeing that and as so I would say in the near term, there’s a slight indexation to that. But at the same time, what we’re finding is a very good and healthy migration to the Rogers brand, especially as a result of, as we’ve talked about our focused efforts on that migration within our base. And so I would say it continues to be balanced much like it always has been. And so I wouldn’t overstate that the market is moving to in a big way to the Flanker. As I said, I think it’s slight, but there’s more than enough offsetting in the base and the rest of the market to get the right mix to the premium brand.

And Jerome in terms of the percentage of our network that we have fibre to the prem without seeking to frustrate you with my answer, we were opportunistic with Atlantic Canada is an overbilled or a rebuild of our network facilities. Because Atlantic Canada is primarily ariel over the air transmission and poles are simply easier to run fiber than burying and replacing plant that way. On a cost per home pass basis we can be opportunistic and run fiber through Atlantic Canada. New construction build when the trenches are open, we’re putting in fiber to the premise. We’re opportunistic with it, but don’t think of it in the context of they’ve done X percent and still have 100 minus x percent to go. Our hybrid fiber coax has a long, long tenure still to run. DOCSIS 4 will be entirely competitive with whatever we can deliver over our fiber to the premise plant as well. There will be comparable and we will be competitive with our peers, where they have fibre to the pram over our hybrid DOCSIS or sorry, hybrid fiber coax plan. So think of it in that regard.

Our next question comes from Aravinda Galappatthige of Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my question. Two for me. One signal back to wireless churn. Obviously we’ve seen an uptick, which is obviously natural, considering sort of the return of foot traffic and so forth. But maybe Tony, you can talk about your expectations over the medium to longer run. I mean, there’s always been a case to suggest that there is going to be structural decline in churn which would obviously help margins, assist the broader model for all the reasons that have been cited from family plans to sort of the lifecycle of the device. I wanted to get your thoughts on how you see that thesis in light of sort of what we’re seeing right now, where most of the companies are coming in with higher wireless churn. And then perhaps Glenn, on the free cash flow guide. I did notice that the cash taxes were materially lower in 2022. I wanted to get a sense of any color you can provide on what you’re building it for ‘23 there with respect to cash taxes. Thank you.

Aravinda on the first part with respect to our thoughts on wireless churn, and the implication of it. Certainly, as you’ve said, the industry has traditionally thought of lower churn as a better enabler, because you save on the cost of acquisition. I think what we found was in particular, when you look at the fourth quarter and the competitive intensity there, I would say the general principle is still true, lower churn is always better. And we’re always focused on making sure we try to keep as many customers and losing one is always too many. So that fundamental doesn’t change. But at the same time, the cost of acquisition if you looked at the industry, overall, over the last three to four years hasn’t been coming down. And so notwithstanding the slightly heightened churn that you see in the fourth quarter. Now you continue to look at our margins sitting at a strong performance there and it’s actually up year-on-year, despite the increase in churn and so when you look at the fundamentals of it I would say our thinking on this is sort of real time matured so that we get the right balance and ultimately It’s net mobile phone market share that we stay focused on. And the churn aspect is one piece of that formula on a secondary metric basis. Hope that helps.

And then Aravinda on the free cash flow and the cash taxes, there’s not a material difference from year-to-year really. You’ll see some difference going from ‘22 to ‘23, as a result of the quarterly timing of some cash taxes that were paid in ‘22. But it’s not, it’s not a semantically material number from one year to the next.

Certainly. Our next question comes from Batya Levi of UBS. Please go ahead.

Can you provide an update on how we should think about this synergies or maybe merger integration cost after the deal? And a second question on what you’re seeing in the business market? And what could be the opportunity after you’re close with deal? Thank you.

Morning Batya and thanks for the question. I’ll start with the second one. And Glenn will come back to the first question. In terms of the overall business market, as you heard in my opening, or on a previous question, the population growth and the contributors to overall market growth that I talked about is certainly helping the consumer side. And as you would expect, we see a very quick follow on lag in the business market. So the size of the business market is improving as well while at the same time, our penetration rates in business and in particular, small business continues to improve. And so the growth that we’re seeing is, I would say slightly more index to small business. And that continues to be an area that we’re quite pleased with our performance in that and continue to see more opportunity for high penetration there.

And then Batya on the cost to achieve the synergies. I think as a rough rule of thumb, if you think of it as we’re driving at a billion dollars a year of synergies, think of it as likely a one times turn on that in terms of our cost to achieve that will give you a rough rule of thumb to work off.

Our final question comes from David McFadgen of Cormark Securities. Please go ahead.

Yes, thanks for squeezing in. So just looking at the guidance, obviously, the guidance looks quite strong. I was just wondering if you can give an update on revenue size, revenue volume versus revenue in the fourth quarter, and then sort of what you have is for next year? And then the second question is, I know that you are saying that your fees are comparable to say fiber offering. But have you explained the fact that they keep putting up very strong internet particularly cable competitors in their footprint, it seems like they’re taking share there. thanks.

Thanks for the question, David. Again, I’ll start with the second one and Glenn, we’ll come back to the first one. As I said, on the subscriber share, internet side on cable it’s not lost on us in terms of our performance on customer share. And so it’s something we’ve looked at very closely and as I said, our response will continue to be very disciplined and measured. And what you see there is not a capability discrepancy but all you’re seeing play out is pricing. And as I said, I think we’ve got the right approach on this and we’re playing the long game. And so I wouldn’t confuse short term promotional pricing with the long term health of that business and the fundamentals in that business. I continued to reiterate that capability speeds on home internet, continue to far outpace where customer demand is. And so average speeds would sit in the 300 megs and so when you compare that to top end speeds that are available in the marketplace, we’re well beyond that by a factor of approaching 10x. So that’s why I say network capability is not at all an issue. And in fact, as I said, we think of our network as a competitive advantage when you look at internet and our TV product combined across our footprint. And so that’s what you see playing out. In our view it’s as simple as that.

And then David on roaming succinctly, we’re running about 85% of roaming volume relative to 2019 pre-COVID levels. And we’re sitting at, we’ve ticked up to about 140%, revenue comparatively against 2019, pre-COVID, revenue, volumes or revenue. So we’ve seen that tick up from Q2 and Q3. Travel remains ongoing. And so we’re through, largely through that cycle of getting back to where we were maybe a little bit more room. But on in terms of volume, but we’ve ticked up a little bit. I would anticipate that roaming revenue to temper a little bit, you’re not going to see that necessarily grow much more than where we’re sitting other than filling in the rest of that volume.

Well, maybe I can just use that. Just to follow up on that, because I’m just wondering how you explain your roaming metrics, like 85% of volume 140% of revenue. When you look at, they announced today that their volumes flat versus pre-COVID, in the revenues, so you’re grabbing up substantially more than theirs, and you’re volumes lower, which implies you have some more upside on roaming, how do you explain that I’m just wanting to get your comments on that.

So without getting inside their numbers, I can’t, I got to reserve my response to mine. I’m confident in where we are. These are rough rules of thumb. The 85%, from month to month, maybe it’s 5 or 10 different here and there, there might be a little bit of rounding. I think generally, you can see it in the airports, the airports are busy. Travel is back Business travel is lighter than it had been previously. Consumer travels probably a little bit heavier business travel a little bit lighter than where we were going through COVID. If airports are able to get their flow sorted out, I think you’ll see continued growth in travel. We’re coming up on March break, it’ll be interesting to see what those volumes are. I think let me just respond by saying the roaming growth is relatively mature relative to where we were two years ago, one year ago. And so we’ve seen some sequential growth from Q2 and Q3 into Q4. We’ve ticked up to 140 versus 130. Great. I think if we hold that growing a little bit as more business travel comes back there’s still room for a little bit of growth. And it’ll be what it’ll be. I’ll pause there.

Thanks, everyone, for joining us today. And if there’s any follow up, please feel free to reach out to us. Thank you.

This concludes today’s conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating and have a pleasant day.