Thank you, Craig, and good morning. I want to emphasize how we have been navigating a market that continues to present challenges. New deal origination across the BDC landscape does remain sluggish and borrowers are still contending with tighter senior credit conditions and higher financing costs. Thus, we have had to be patient and selective in our deal origination. However, I believe we are seeing some positive turns now in our favor. We've remained somewhat active in the quarter and deployed $2.9 million in new and follow-on investments. We are also seeing, as many peers have noted a greater use of PIK or PIK interest by borrowers as they adapt to today's financing environment. This is something we monitor carefully and will need to reduce over time, but it also reflects the flexibility that our capital can provide and helping companies bridge through tighter credit markets. Most importantly, we finished the quarter with nearly $28 million in liquidity and no debt outstanding under our senior credit facilities. That kind of balance sheet strength is our real differentiator in this environment. It gives us the flexibility to support our dividend, remain patient when deal flow is muted and quickly move when compelling opportunities arise. Even though total investment income declined year-over-year, the steps we have taken to control expenses enabled us to grow net investment income. This quarter really underscored our ability to execute with discipline and maintain a resilience in our dividend for our shareholders. Please now turn to Slide 4. I want to highlight the consistency of that dividend. We declared and paid our regularly quarterly distribution of $0.29 per share, marking the third consecutive quarter at this level. We recognize how important this income stream is for our shareholders, and we are proud that we have been able to sustain it even as new investment activity has slowed. One of the advantages of our model is that it is built to support this dividend through different parts of the economic cycle. Even in periods when repayments outweigh new originations, our expense management and strong liquidity allow us to maintain the payout. Many BDCs talk about dividend stability as a marker of portfolio strength and the strength and quality of the BDC. We believe our results demonstrate exactly that. Moving to Slide 5. Let's take a closer look at our portfolio. At September 30, our investments had a fair value of $44.3 million across 19 companies. That represents a decline from year-end and sequentially, largely due to significant repayments from our portfolio companies and some valuation adjustments. Our mix at quarter end was 83% debt and 17% equity with a weighted average yield of 12.2%. That yield reflects the sub-debt investing nature of our portfolio structure. As we move to Slide 6, I will touch on the puts and takes in the portfolio this quarter. We stayed selective, yet active, adding 1 new investment, and we supported an existing portfolio company. First, the new investment, we committed $2.5 million to BlackJet Direct Marketing, structured as a $2.25 million term loan at 14%, plus 1% PIK interest. We also contributed or invested rather a $250,000 equity investment alongside our debt instrument. BlackJet focuses on targeted direct mail for the travel and tourism, home services and legal services verticals. These are areas where precise customer acquisition remains critical and where our capital can support growth also delivering an attractive risk-adjusted return for Rand. Equally important to the financial aspects of the transaction was the involvement of the lead equity sponsor and our sub-debt co-investor, both of whom we have partnered with and our deal team had on prior transactions. We also funded a $400,000 follow-on investment in a debt instrument to food service supply. That business specializes in design, distribution and installation work for commercial kitchen renovations and new builds. It does remain a contributor to our income, which supports our dividend. After quarter end valuation adjustments, our total debt and equity investment in FSS stood at a fair value of $4.3 million. On the realized side, activity was meaningful. Seybert's or The Rack Group repaid $7.6 million of principal. We continue rather to hold an equity position in Seybert's with a value of $500,000. That preserves our participation in the business' long-term potential. Seybert's or the Rack Group's repayment illustrates the natural progression of a growing enterprise as operational success within the portfolio company translates into their sustained revenue and profit growth, the business becomes eligible for a more favorable commercial bank financing, which is often taken on to refinance prior obligations such as Rand's debt. This does support further development and growth in the company and that is a key critical item to why we hold these equity interest, which we will directly benefit from. We also exited Lumious, receiving $713,000 in loan and principal, recognizing a $77,000 realized loss. It is a small step back, but it does return capital in excess of our prior quarter's valuation, and we can redeploy these funds into new opportunities. And finally, we recognized a $2.9 million realized loss on Tilson Technology Management following its Chapter 11 process and asset sales, we had valued this at $0 during the prior quarter so this was posted as a realized loss now. While Tilson's outcome was disappointing, it's important to note that our separate investment in SQF Holdco, which is now called Verta is not part of the Tilson bankruptcy. This remains on the books of Rand at $2.0 million and continues to operate independently. Verta stands for vertical infrastructure, think 5G antennas on telephone poles or cell towers or on the top of water towers for businesses like T-Mobile. Stepping back now, this mix of new deployment, support of follow-on and repayments is exactly how our model is designed to work, recycling capital for maturities and exits into yield orientated structures. It does keep the portfolio resilient while preserving the optionality to lean in as origination conditions improve. With that context, let's look at how these moves reshaped our industry mix for the quarter. On Slide 7, you will see how our portfolio is spread across industries as repayments and adjustments came through this quarter, the mix shifted modestly. The most notable change was within consumer products as that exposure came down following the Seybert's or Rack Group repayment. That business is in the niche industry of Billiards supply. While individual positions may change, what's important is that our portfolio remains balanced which we believe reduces overall exposure to any single sector and does give us the ability to participate in growth across a range of industries. Slide 8 highlights our 5 largest portfolio companies, which together represent about half of our total portfolio value. Each of these investments is structured to deliver attractive yields generally between 12% and 14%, with features such as PIK that provide for flexibility for borrowers while still supporting Rand's income stream. Following the Rack Group repayment and the FSS valuation change, INEA or EFINEA and Caitec now rank among our largest positions. The strength and consistency of these holdings is what gives us confidence in our ability to support the dividend and protect shareholder value. With that, I'll now turn it over to Margaret who will walk you through our financials in more detail.