Jennifer Harris
Analyst · Stifel. Your line is open
Thanks, Matt. We are please to have delivered third quarter revenue that exceeded the high-end of our guidance. Let me briefly review our results for the third quarter, before turning to updated guidance for the fourth quarter and full-year 2016. Total revenue for the third quarter was $38.3 million, an increase of 37% year-over-year and up 6% from the pervious quarter. Our increased revenue in the third quarter was primarily result of continued growth in our subscription revenue business. Subscription revenue benefited from a full quarter contribution from users added late in the second quarter. This was partially offset by the previously announced attrition of users from PacWest. Transaction based revenue grew in actual dollars year-over-year and sequentially and represented 17% of total revenue in the quarter down slightly from 18% in the second quarter and 19% in the year-ago period. As we turn to gross margin and operating expenses, let me remind you that unless otherwise stated all references to our expenses and operating results are on a non-GAAP basis. Gross margin was 52.3%, up from 47.7% in the year-ago period and up from 51.1% in the previous quarter. Both the year-over-year and sequential improvements were attributable to growth in subscription revenue. Total operating expenses were $23 million, up 36% from one year ago and up only modestly from the previous quarter. Sales and marketing expenses were $8.4 million, up 34% year-over-year, but down 8% sequentially. The year-over-year increase was primarily due to investments in headcount, while lower sequential spending was the result of our annual customer conference held in the second quarter. Research and development spending was $7.5 million, up 31% year-over-year and up 4% as compared to the previous quarter. The increased R&D spending year-over-year and sequentially reflects increased headcount, as well as the acquisition of Social Money in November of 2015. General and administrative expenses were $7.2 million, up 42% from a year-ago and up 16% from the previous quarter. These increases were driven by the management team additions that Matt referenced earlier as well as higher professional services spend and external audit fees related to the accelerated SOX compliance that I discussed with you during our second quarter conference call. Adjusted EBITDA was negative $1.1 million, compared to negative $2.2 million in the year-ago period and negative $2.3 million in the second quarter. Both the year-over-year and sequential improvements were largely a result of higher revenue and gross margin, while the sequential improvement also benefited from a decline in spending related to our annual customer conference held during the second quarter, partially offset by the higher G&A spending in the current quarter. As I have told you in the past, I expect continued sequential improvements in adjusted EBITDA posting our first quarter of positive adjusted EBITDA as we exit this year. We ended the quarter with cash, cash equivalents and investments of $92.3 million, down slightly from $95.6 million in the second quarter, driven primarily by the continued build out of our facilities expansion. Cash flow from operations for the third quarter was positive $1 million, while the Company incurred net capital expenditures of $4.8 million. The majority of the capital expenditures relate to tenant improvements at our facilities in Austin and Lincoln and I expect spending related to tenant improvements to drop significantly in 2017. Let me wrap up by sharing our fourth quarter and full-year 2016 guidance. We forecast fourth quarter revenue in the range of $41 million to $41.6 million and full-year revenue in the range of $149.1 million to $149.7 million, representing 37% to 38% year-over-year growth. Consistent with the expectations we set earlier in the year, we expect to transition to positive adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter. We forecast fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA in a range of positive $900,000 to positive $1.3 million. That will result in full-year adjusted EBITDA of negative $4.5 million to negative $4.9 million, which represents a year-over-year improvement in adjusted EBITDA of 40% to 45%. Now, let me turn the call back to Matt for his closing remarks.