Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. I am Katie, your call operator. Welcome, and thank you for joining QIAGEN's Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call Webcast. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised this call is being recorded at QIAGEN's request and will be made available on their Internet site. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I'd like to introduce your host, Daniel Wendorff, Vice President and Head of Relations at QIAGEN. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and welcome to our call for the fourth quarter of 2025. We appreciate your time and interest in QIAGEN. Joining the call today are Thierry Bernard, our Chief Executive Officer; and Roland Sackers, our Chief Financial Officer. Also joining us is Dr. Domenica Martorana from our Investor Relations team. As always, today's call is being webcast live and will be archived in the IR section of our website at www.qiagen.com, where you can find the press release and presentation accompanying this call. Please also note that this call will include forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those projected due to a number of factors outlined in our most recent Form 20-F and other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We will also refer to certain financial measures not prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles or GAAP, that provide additional insights into our performance. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP figures are in the release and presentation. All references to earnings per share refer to adjusted diluted EPS. With that, let me hand the call over to Thierry.

Thanks a lot, Daniel. Hello, and good morning, good afternoon or good evening, depending on where you are in the world, and thank you once again for joining us. I am very pleased today to confirm that QIAGEN continued to perform and delivered a solid finish to '25 with results in the fourth quarter, again above outlook. We exceeded our targets for both sales and adjusted earnings, once again placing QIAGEN among the fastest-growing companies in our industry. This reflects continued execution across the business and the trust our customers place in us even in a challenging environment. I also want to recognize the dedication of our teams around the world. Their work has been essential in delivering those results. So let me walk you through our key messages for today. First, we exceeded our outlook for the fourth quarter, and we also delivered solid full year 2025 results at the high end of our expectation with adjusted earnings again above our guidance. Net sales were $540 million in the fourth quarter, growing 1% at CER and exceeding our outlook for flat sales development against the fourth quarter of '24. Adjusted diluted EPS was $0.62 at constant exchange rate, exceeding our outlook of about $0.60 constant exchange rate again. For the full year of 2025, net sales were $2.09 billion, up 5% at CER and at the upper end of our outlook of about 4% to 5% growth. Adjusted diluted EPS increased to $2.40 at CER. This was above our outlook, which we increased twice during the year and reflects our ability to deliver in a challenging environment. Second key message, we reached important milestones across our portfolio. We want to highlight here that across our growth pillars, Sample technologies, QuantiFERON, QIAstat, QIAcuity and QIAGEN Digital Insights, they all achieved…

Thank you, Thierry. Hello, everyone. Thank you as well for me for joining our call. We are pleased with our performance in the fourth quarter and full year '25 as we delivered results above our outlook for the fourth quarter on both sales and adjusted diluted EPS at constant exchange rates. 2025 was overall another solid year for QIAGEN in terms of execution and delivering on our commitments. Let me frame our performance around 3 key messages. First, we delivered solid results with sales for '25 at the high end of our outlook with continued strength in consumables and our growth pillars amid a cautious funding and capital spending environment. Second, we improved profitability, expanding the adjusted operating income margin by 80 basis points over '24 on efficiency gains and operational discipline. These actions more than offset material headwinds from tariffs and currency movements. And third, we continue to deploy capital in a disciplined manner. We are investing to support future growth while increasing returns to shareholders. Our strong free cash flow enabled us to make investments into bolt-on deals like Parse and Genoox, while also returning over USD 1.1 billion to shareholders since 2024. With that context, let me focus on the financial drivers behind our results. For the fourth quarter, net sales grew 1% CER and exceeded our outlook for flat sales development against the same period in '24. Adjusted diluted EPS was $0.62 at CER and above our outlook for about $0.60. For the full year, sales increased 5% CER, and this was at the high end of our outlook. Our growth pillars delivered 8% CER growth for the year and reached our goal for $1.49 billion of combined sales at CER. So we are on track to achieve our '28 goal for at least $2 billion…

Thanks a lot, Roland. And let me share with you a bit of perspective on our product portfolio. Starting with sample technologies, as you know, a key focus for QIAGEN. In December, we completed the acquisition of Parse Biosciences, extended our sample technologies portfolio into single cell analysis. Parse has a scalable, differentiated chemistry that strengthens our Sample to Insight workflows and opens a long-term growth opportunity. Recent launches such as Evercode Whole Blood Fixation enable immediate fixation at collection and extend Parse's reach into translational and clinical research workflows. Alongside this expansion and acquisition, we execute on our next-generation automation road map. In 2025, we successfully launched QIAsymphony Connect, took initial orders for QIAsprint Connect and remain on track for the launch of QIAmini. Within Sample technologies, strategic high-value applications to continue to gain traction. One example is our liquid biopsy sample preparation portfolio, which grew by more than 30%, reflecting this increasing relevance in Sample technologies. Despite cautious capital spending, our sample technologies installed base grew to around 31,400 cumulative placements. Looking 2026, we will launch QIAsprint Connect and QIAmini together with additional kits, supporting automation across more than 30 applications for QIAsprint Connect and more than 15 applications for QIAmini. Over time, this will increase instrument use and recurring consumables. Full IVDR launch for QIAsymphony Connect remains on track for mid-2026. QIAsprint Connect is planned for February and QIAmini for fall of 2026. Moving to QuantiFERON, where we continue to invest, enabling laboratories to manage rising testing volumes with higher throughput and more efficient workflows. A key step here is the next generation of QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus second assay developed in collaboration with Diasorin. Last year, we completed the European launch of this high-throughput assay. This new generation of chemistry enables laboratories to test up to…

Thank you, Thierry. Let me now provide some additional perspectives on our outlook for '26 and for the first quarter. Our ambition remains to deliver solid profitable growth as we continue to navigate a challenging macroeconomic environment. Against this backdrop, we remain on track toward our '28 ambitions of around 7% core sales CAGR from '24 to '28 and adjusted operating income margin of at least 31%, at least $2 billion of sales from our growth pillars and sustained shareholder returns, having already delivered more than $1 billion since '24. For the full year '26, we are initiating an outlook for sales growth of at least 5 percentage points CER and adjusted earnings per share of at least $2.50 at CER. Turning to the first quarter. We expect net sales growth of at least 1% CER compared with sales of $483 million of the first quarter of '25. The growth rate for the first quarter compared to the full year target reflects 3 temporary factors. First, we are absorbing the year-over-year impact from the discontinuation of NeuMoDx and Dialunox, which represents a headwind of about $10 million or about 2 percentage points in the first quarter. We will see the same impact in the second quarter of '26, but then it rolls off since these products were discontinued in June '25. Second, and like others in our industry, we continue to see cautious life science customer spending trends carrying over from '25 into the beginning of '26. We have reflected an estimated impact of about $10 million in the first quarter or about 2 percentage points of growth. At the same time, we continue to expect an improvement in the funding environment over the course of the year. And third, QuantiFERON faces a strong comparison to results in the first…

Thank you, Roland. And before we go to the Q&A, let me quickly summarize our key messages for today. First, looking back on 2025, QIAGEN delivered another solid quarter and closed the year with consistent execution across the business. The growth pillars grew at 8% CER, and this is among the fastest in our industry. This once again reflects the strength and balance of our portfolio across Life Sciences and Diagnostics. At the same time, we remain obviously mindful of our environment. We continue to operate amid macroeconomic uncertainty, cautious capital spending and ongoing volatility, which requires discipline and focus in how we manage the business. Looking ahead, our growth pillars are positioned to continue growing in 2026, supported by a very strong pipeline of new product launches and portfolio additions. While we continue to see a cautious life sciences funding environment and softer capital spending, we expect conditions to improve gradually over the course of the year. Keep in mind, that our outlook for the first half of 2026 is clearly impacted by many base effects from last year, and we are relentless about the contributions ahead from the upcoming new product launches. We expect our growth pillars combined to step up again in '26, targeting growth of around 9% at CER. Sample technologies is targeting sales of around $720 million CER. QuantiFERON around $535 million; QIAstat around $160 million; QIAcuity around $100 million; and QDI around $125 million. As you clearly see, our focus remains on disciplined execution and operational excellence. In 2025, adjusted diluted EPS grew to $2.40 at CER, and we continue to return capital to shareholders. With the completion of the $500 million share repurchase at the beginning of 2026, we delivered on our commitment for solid profitable growth. Those results are keeping us on track against our 2028 ambitions of about 7% sales CAGR, at least 31% adjusted operating income margin, at least $2 billion of sales from our growth pillars and the shareholder returns of at least $1 billion, which, as I just said, we already exceeded. With that, I'd like to thank you again for your attention and hand back to Daniel and the operator for the Q&A session. Thank you.

Thank you very much, Thierry. Operator, I think we can now go into the Q&A session.

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from Tycho Peterson with Jefferies.

I want to start out on some of the new product launches. QIAcuity, QIAstat adding 200 basis points to growth in the back half of the year. Maybe just give us a little more color on the products. Is this about new markets or deeper penetration? And what gives you confidence they'll contribute to growth out of the gate? And then on QIAcuity, help us bridge to the $250 million target by 2028 because you have missed your targets there in the last couple of years. So talk about what you think really gets you to that target by 2028. And then just one follow-up on QuantiFERON on the assumptions for the back half of the year bridge. I think you previously said growth targets would include competitive entry. Is that still baked in and by how much?

Thank you, Tycho, and I will try to make sure that I'm not forgetting any of your questions. On the new products and the impact of at least 2% extra growth from H2 to -- compared to H1 of '26. The way you need to see it is that at least 3 of those new launches are opening completely new markets from QIAGEN. Of course, the new panel of QIAstat, the blood carrier panel is opening new segment of customers, new needs. So it's an add-on. In Sample tech, QIAsprint marks the entry of QIAGEN into very high throughput sample technologies, where we are not at the moment. Therefore, new market. QIAmini is offering or will offer automation for low throughput labs or very small volume research, new markets. So you can see that it's justified and realistic to add growth in the second half of the year because of those impacts. QIAsymphony Connect will be not only upgraded QIAsymphony, but probably also convince other customers to adopt this technology. So that's why we are confident in this number. On QIAcuity, you are perfectly right, Tycho. Over the last 2 years, because our sales on digital PCR are mainly directed at the moment in research and academia, we have disclosed that we have been impacted by a more sluggish environment of capital expenses in research and academia. So that created a bit of delay in revenues coming from instrumentation from Digital PCR. The consumables have been good. For the last 3 years, we systematically grew at double digit, but instruments were a bit below our expectation. But again, what are we talking about here? When we see or when we say below our expectation, if I take 2025 as an example, we still put more than 500 new QIAcuity on the market. If you look at Q4, we put more than 100 systems in Q4, 100 new QIAcuity. Those systems will obviously generate consumables tomorrow. So we have indeed given a target of $250 million revenues by '28 for digital PCR at QIAGEN. We might have a slight delay because of the sluggish capital expense environment, but what is important to us is that we continue to grow, we capture new market and we grow consumables at double digit while still placing a significant number of instruments every year. Now for QuantiFERON, we explained the profile of the growth for '26. H1 is impacted by base effect coming by tenders and significant contract in Q4 of '24 and Q1 of '25. You will see QuantiFERON picking up in Q2. And obviously, those base effects will progressively disappear, and you'll see QuantiFERON accelerating to achieve probably above 6% growth, let's say, between 6% and 7% growth in 2027 -- in '26, I'm sorry, which is perfectly aligned with the target that we gave during our Capital Market Day in June '24, QuantiFERON will be $600 million revenues by 2028.

We'll take our next question from Jack Meehan with Nephron.

Thierry, I wanted to get your thoughts. There were headlines a few weeks ago around QIAGEN as a potential deal target again. I was wondering what comments, if any, you can share on that?

Thanks for the question, Jack, and I was expecting a question on this. I mean it's fair to say that our market is still and will still going through consolidation. That's point number one. At the same time, QIAGEN is delivering and focusing on delivering on our solid plan for the coming years, the plan that we disclosed in New York in June '24, 7% CAGR on the top line, at least 31% EBIT margin, $2 billion from our pillars of growth. So this is where we are focusing. At the same time, we do not comment on rumors. We are always open for discussion that could create value for shareholders, and I cannot say more at this stage.

Understood. And I appreciate the execution has been really solid, and you still have your hand firmly on the wheel, but also did want to ask about the CEO succession search. Just was wondering when you think we might have an update on that?

What is important for the Board and for the company is to find the best person for the job. So we have a search ongoing. As we said in Q4 of '25, this is both an external and internal search. It's advancing very well, but we need to take the necessary time once again to find the best person for the job. In the meantime, we do have the management fully dedicated to QIAGEN. It's not only Thierry, it's the entire executive committee and also 5,700 of QIAGENers all over the world. We will obviously update you as we can progress.

We'll take our next question from Casey Woodring with JPMorgan.

I wanted to ask on the margin expansion piece. The bridge to 2026 didn't seem to include any operating margin improvement this year outside of the efficiency program, which will [indiscernible] tariff headwinds, unless I'm misinterpreting your comments there. So maybe just can you walk us through how you're thinking about organic operating leverage across the business and how some of the new product volume is expected to contribute to the bottom line this year?

Again, I do think actually that '26 will be another significant margin improvement year for QIAGEN because I think it's clearly fair to say that we do expect -- we announced headwinds from the acquisitions of Parse. As you know, that is an acquisition where we're doubling up on the R&D -- doubling down on the R&D investment. So there's clearly a certain dilution for us to expect for this year, and that is around 100 basis points for 2026. In addition to that, we have a combined headwind again also from tariffs and FX in '26. So there will be a net margin improvement or gross margin improvement for around about 160 basis points for this year, which again will be compensated, as I said, from Parse and tariffs and expected currency headwinds. So 160 basis points, how does this break down? A larger part actually this year comes and we talked about that in the past from gross margin improvements. I would say probably somewhere between 75 and plus basis points in '26 comes from gross margin improvement. Have in mind, you will see an acceleration -- quite significant acceleration in sample prep growth -- sample preparation growth. And clearly, sample preparation is also one of the product groups, which has a significant gross margin contribution to QIAGEN. So that should be helpful. And in addition to that, we still continue to see outstanding growth trend around QIAstat. And you also know that we in the past talked about that we're still running on an underutilization in terms of production utilization for QIAstat. So also here, better utilization will drive gross margin improvement. Last but not least, we still have ongoing 40 QIAefficiency program on the operational expense side. They all will contribute not only in '26 also beyond. So again, we expect margin improvement this year. We expect to continue that in '27, '28. And as Thierry said in his remarks, we clearly do believe we will be -- see a significant step-up north of the 31%, which was announced for '28.

We'll take our next question from Aisyah Noor with Morgan Stanley.

My one question is on China. So can you confirm if you are exposed to VBP or any large tender renewals that we should be aware about? And what's the China growth outlook embedded in your guidance?

Thanks for the question, Aisyah. We keep the same attitude and consideration towards China. As we have said for the last 3 years, it's not significant in our revenues anymore. Our exposure is 4% to China. It's a large market. It's too large of a market to be ignored. At the same time, it's too specific and too politically driven as a market to make it an investment case. We are not specifically more impacted by VBP because VBP has been implemented across molecular solutions, at least for the last 3 years in China. So it's nothing new for us. Last year was negative. We continue to think that China will be between low single digit to negative to at very best flat. And we do not expect in the current political situation, economic situation and market situation of China to see a return of growth in the visible future. But again, our exposure is very limited, as I said, 4% of sales.

We'll take our next question from Odysseas Manesiotis with BNP Paribas.

Firstly, on QIAstat, you finally have a complete menu, a high-volume platform during what seems to be a material year for replacing such instruments. Is it fair to assume that you'll do much better than the 600 placements you did in '26 -- in '25?

Well, I appreciate that you always want more, but more than 600 placements in 2025, it's already a good performance. So I prefer to leave it like this. We grow at 25% for Q4. We grew at much more than double digit for '25. We gave you an objective of more than $160 million for '26, which shows, again, a double-digit growth. We are a solid #2 on this market. This is exactly what we wanted to achieve. And if we can beat our objective on new placement, we will do it. But let's execute first on the $160 million. Let's execute on the product launches, on the market penetration, and that will be already good.

And a follow-up on QuantiFERON. Could you give us a bit of additional color on the Q1 guidance here? I mean, is there any price component to your conservativeness there? And how exactly were these one-off tenders given the low shelf life of the kit?

Yes. I think it's not a question of shelf life. It's a fair question, but it's just a comparison quarter-on-quarter on deals that we have been able to include in our sales. It's a base effect. If you look at QIAGEN recent communication on QuantiFERON, it did include over the last 3 years, some press releases sometimes of significant tenders in Middle East, the contract with Oman was one of them. In Latin America, the contract in Brazil was another one of that. So those are creating a base impact compared to Q1 2026 because of their date of signature or renewal. As Roland explained during his comments, growth of QuantiFERON for Q1 2025 was close to 16%. We need to compare this with a normalized growth of QuantiFERON over the year, which is 10%. In other words, we grew in Q1 of '25, 6 points above the normal growth of QIAGEN. It creates necessarily a base impact. This is not a conservative guidance. It's just a realistic guidance. Regarding prices, we were very clear when we issued the guidance for QuantiFERON early '25. We know that competition will increase on that market. We factored that in our number, $600 million for 2028. And we always said that our plan commercially is to move even more customers to pre-annual contracts. This is good for the business. This is good for the franchise. If this sometimes goes with a bit of pricing flexibility, it's a good thing to do.

We'll take our next question from Michael Ryskin with Bank of America.

I want to ask a little bit more in the 1Q outlook outside of QuantiFERON. You talked about some of the moving pieces there in terms of the comps, in terms of the NeuMoDx shutdown, things like that. I want to dive into your expectations for end markets. You had some comments on you expect end market improvement as you go through the year. But maybe if you could just expand on that a little bit of how much of that is built into 1Q specifically, maybe as far as U.S. government shutdown or broader markets in general? And just what the degree of improvement you're embedding as you go through the year to sort of like hit that back half ramp?

So the first comment, Michael, is that the overall market, if I look at some of our main competitors' recent earnings calls, we see that they are in the same ballpark of guidance for Q1, most of them, not to say all of them. It is clear, and we already said that last year that if we consider the funding environment, especially for research and academia labs and especially in the U.S., we believe that the situation is better now than it was 6 months ago. Why? Because 6 months ago, most of the comments were targeting a significant decrease of budget like NIH, for example. When now we know that we are going to be probably seeing a slight increase in '26 of the NIH budget, let's say, max around 1%. This is good for the business. At the same time, we said today that we believe that many research and academia labs are still in a kind of wait-and-see attitude. Once they get more visibility, we believe and it's embedded partially in our H2 expectation that capital expense, especially in Research and Academia will improve. Because they will have more visibility. So we think that it's fair to assume that progressively throughout 2026, the total market can come back to a growth of mid-single digit.

Okay. Okay. That's helpful. And then maybe I can dig into Sample tech a little bit. In the slides, I think you called out a $720 million target for 2026. Just to confirm, that includes Parse contribution in it of about $40 million. And then just confirming that. And then the second part of that question would be just how much of that do you expect to be contribution from some of those new automation solutions in Sample tech? Is that a meaningful contributor to 2026 in that part of the portfolio? Or is that just going to take a little longer to ramp?

So you're perfectly right for your numbers. We said $720 million total Sample tech. It includes indeed around $40 million contribution from Parse. And as we discussed you and I yesterday, Parse contribution will be higher. If you compare H1 to H2 for Parse, we are probably at 40% for H1 and 60% for H2 in terms of weight in their revenues. So you're perfectly right on that. Now if you consider the new launches, QIAsymphony Connect, QIAsprint Connect and QIAmini, they are fully embedded in the 2% extra growth coming from the new products that we are planning H2 to H1.

We'll take our next question from Kavya Deshpande with UBS.

Just a couple on QIAstat, please. So firstly, on the guidance for 2026, is there anything you might be able to share on what you're assuming in that guide for the U.S. respiratory season in 2026? And then secondly, I think you shared a couple of years ago that at the point of your last CMD, over 50% of QIAstat customers were using more than 2 panels. Would you have any update on this? It would be good to get that just given you've done a lot of menu expansion since then.

That was our first question. I think we have seen that, again, the respiratory season was significant from December '25 to probably now. We'll see what is going to happen in the coming weeks. You perfectly read, I believe, that there are harsh winter condition in the U.S. as we speak, but it's too early to say. What I can tell you is that I believe that respiratory issues will remain significant for the years to come. And that's why the respiratory panel on syndromic like QIAstat are so important. I think people are more aware, they are more aware of flu, whether it's A and B, RSV, obviously, COVID or other respiratory pathogen. So I believe that it's going to become a well-established panel and testing for the years to come. That's why it's key to have this panel. And as you know, in the U.S., not only we have it in a long format, large number of pathogen, but we have it also on a short format -- a more reduced number of pathogen. So to your second part of your question, what's the proportion of customers using more than one panel? It's clear that the 50% continues to increase because that's the relevance of adding panel consistently year after year. And as you know, those panels are very coherent. They address mostly infectious diseases laboratories. So yes, this number is improving as well.

We'll take our next question from Harry Gillis with Berenberg.

I have 2 on the midterm guidance. Could you just confirm whether your target for 7% sales growth through to '28 or the $2 billion from your growth pillars stands excluding the contribution of Parse? And then secondly, you've previously talked about being well ahead of your 31% margin target in '28, but I noticed you haven't really talked about that recently. And obviously, you talked about 180 basis points of negative FX impact from tariffs over this year and over '25 and '26. Are you still well ahead of this target despite these headwinds? Or should we now assume that's not the case?

So we mentioned that, and I will also ask Roland to chime in at a point. So first of all, to your first question, the 7% CAGR. We gave that CAGR in June of 2024 in our CMD, Capital Market Day in New York. You will agree with us that since 2024, the economic environment have become even more volatile, tariffs, volatility in currency evolutions, geopolitical instability, funding difficulties for research and academia. Confronted with those difficult and volatile market condition, this is the role of management to take the necessary capital allocation to defend our growth profile. And this is perfectly what is behind the acquisition of companies like Genoox and Parse, fully synergistic with our portfolio accretive to our top line and financially accretive in a reasonable time frame. So because our environment has worsened, it's fair to say that the 7% now fully include also the recent acquisition. If the market improves quicker, we might even beat that. But at the moment, let's focus and execute on the 7% all in. To the second question, Roland alluded to it, and I will also invite him to give his opinion. We believe we can beat the 31%. At the same time, we say the market is still difficult around us. So let's see what could be a new guidance analyzing different factors before we come to the market. Roland on this point?

Yes. Thank you, Thierry. And again, just to give you some further thoughts to that. Again, as I said before, we clearly do expect that the growth in '26 is particularly driven by a very strong growth of our pillars of growth, right? Pillars of growth are going to grow 9%. Sample prep is going into high single-digit area. QIAstat, nice significant double digit, QIAcuity, significantly double digit, QDI double digit as well. These are all high-margin products for us. So we will see an impact here as well. I do think -- and again, also just looking on '25, it's a proof of evidence, right? Sorry that we didn't know that the U.S. is implementing tariffs. But if I exclude that and again, putting currency movement at the side, we gave out a target of $150 million, and we were achieving $200 million. Again, we were not -- just for a single year, that's a significant improvement. We're not standing still this year. And I'm quite sure that we have with our 40 operational efficiency program, a lot of things which we still can move. So it's not that we have to generate a day. It's about execution. And I do think that, that is well on its way. So yes, there will be something north of 31%. I do think it's fair that -- also to say that we will take the time to announce it because we're still alluding out, we're in a management transition here. It doesn't mean that the guidance and the numbers are going to change. But I think it's also fair that whoever comes in has to review the number and has the opportunity to review the number and then we go to the market.

We'll take our next question from Dan Brennan with TD Cowen.

Maybe just first one, just back to QuantiFERON, if you don't mind. Just on the pricing comment, Thierry, has this been consistent with what's been happening in the market over the last couple of years? Or is this kind of more of a newer strategy just to try to lock in some customers, maybe making some price concessions? Just wondering if you can kind of elaborate on that.

No, no, it's not a new strategy, Dan. We disclosed that very transparently more than a year ago. We see an evolution of competition, and we need to fight also to make sure that we can move an already important base of customers who are -- that are on a pre-annual contract to more customers on pre-annual contracts. So it's always a negotiation. We just disclosed last year that we need to be ready also to make some concessions. But if it secures a deal for 2 or 3 years more, I think those are interesting concessions. Obviously, they have to be reasonable. What I can guarantee you then is that overall, we continue to pass price increase every year on QuantiFERON as well. So if you look at the performance on pricing 2025 for QuantiFERON, it was positive. I was just saying that when it's necessary, we need to be flexible. That's it.

Terrific. And then maybe just a follow-up. I know there was a question earlier back on like strategic landscape, things like that, which I'm sure you're limited in what you could say. But maybe can you speak to a little bit the market environment? You've been delivering on your plans and kind of ahead of plans in some cases, for the '28 targets. But when you look at like where the market sits today, you've got some pressure on academic and pharma, even though things might be getting better and unclear if customers want to deal with less players. So while you're executing when you think about QIAGEN's ability to win or to be successful to create shareholder value as a stand-alone versus maybe as part of a bigger company like has anything changed over the last year or 2 just given the market dynamics?

We have all seen that the market dynamic has been impacted by volatility and uncertainties over the last 2 years and 3 years, especially in research and academia. I think clinical has been a bit better. To your question, QIAGEN has a clear plan for sales, all our pipeline for new launches for profitability. We disclosed that plan in New York in June '24. And so far, we are executing as per this plan. This is where we focus. Yes, the market has become more difficult. But as I said, we found also a solution to continue to support our growth in addition to our organic growth. Those are the acquisition of very interesting technologies, Franklin or Parse. We will continue to do that. QIAGEN invests and will continue to invest on average between 9% to 10% of our sales into research and development. This translates into launches of new products. 3 new system, for example, in Sample tech this year. This is unprecedented. So it's clear that should laboratory in research and academia start again to invest in capital expense, we are coming with new solution, QIAGEN will probably will be one of their priorities. This is what I can say is that the market has not been easier, more volatile, but the fundamentals of the market, both life science and clinical remains extremely strong. When we will have more visibility on economic evolution and funding, I think it's fair to say single-digit -- mid-single-digit growth profile for this market is perfectly acceptable and realistic.

We'll take our next question from Doug Schenkel with Wolfe Research.

One on guidance and then one on disclosure requirements. Simply put, I'm having a hard time getting the math to work. It could be me, but let's for a second, assume it's not. If we grow revenue around 5% reported, if operating margin remains flat net of deals, FX, if we keep nonoperating items about flat year-over-year and we reduced share count to 209 million, I think those are all your key guidance assumptions as well as you provided tax rate. If I put this together, you end up actually above $2.60 per share, if I'm doing the basic math right. You guided to $2.50 or better. What are we missing? So that's the first question. The second on disclosure requirements. Keeping in mind that you cited, I think it was German disclosure requirements as one of the key reasons that you disclosed this plan when you did. I'm wondering what would be the logical next required disclosure. Obviously, a new hire would need to be disclosed, but is there anything else under regulations that you would likely have to disclose in advance of that event?

I do not want to disappoint you, Doug, on your numbers, but I do think you looks like that some of your team is missing one number because one number, of course, is significantly going to change with is the net interest contribution because we clearly did an acquisition, we clearly did a significant share buyback program with $500 million. So the net interest number is probably somewhere between $40 million and $45 million down. So that is probably the number you are missing in your calculation. And yes, on disclosure requirement, again, German law is complicated. So I'm lucky enough, I was never becoming a lawyer. And we're clearly working with our lawyers on this topic all the time. Again, the general rule is if there is material news in the market regardless of which topic and you have the feeling that there is information in the market, which is clearly based on, call it, leak information or exchange the share price into a significant extent, the company has to comment on that. And that is regardless of any topic, right? And so I would say that is the framework. As I said, we typically leave these decisions to our lawyers to judge and again, any kind of information if that is an important event, which we have to preannounce or not, you haven't seen anything from QIAGEN so far.

Thank you. That will conclude our question-and-answer session. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back over to Mr. Wendorff for any additional or closing remarks.

Thank you very much. I would like to close this conference call, and thank you for your participation. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you very much.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the conference call. Thank you for joining, and have a pleasant day. Goodbye.