So John -- thank you. So there are -- in dry eye there are -- obviously, there are multiple strategies that one can employ. The most efficient, of course, would be -- to be -- to have 2 clinical -- Phase III clinical trials that replicate, and in which both the sign and a symptom met significant -- statistical significance in both studies, obviously, the same signs and symptoms in both studies.
And then in addition to that, you would need your open-label safety. So it's technically 3 studies, depending on how you do it. And that's really what we're really shooting for here, right? That's the most efficient way to do it. And that's one of the reasons why we built in an interim assessment in the first study is really to make sure that we can take a look, make sure that we were on track, make sure we have the right size, right symptoms as we go forward. And you have a successful Phase -- first Phase III trial, which is where we get a sign and a symptom. And then that would have to replicate in a second study.
If one was only to hit, say, for example, a sign and -- but -- and had a very good idea of how you might reach the symptom or vice versa, then you could take an alternative strategy, which would be to do 2 -- 4 Phase III studies, they can be smaller, of course, in size where you would look for hitting the sign in [ 2 ] and then the symptom in the second. So that's a longer-term strategy, obviously, a more expensive strategy.
So our overall objective is really to nail the sign and the symptom in both MELODY-1 and then a subsequent MELODY-2, then MELODY-3 would be an open-label safety study. That will be the most cost-effective and efficient way to go forward. With regards to signs and symptoms, we have some that are predefined. But of course, based on the interim assessment, we have some flexibility there. And I think I would rather wait until the second quarter, try to give a little more detail on that. We have an abstract that has been on the first 120 patients that's been accepted for presentation. So I don't want to front run that. But there will be some nice coming attractions in late April at the ARVO meeting, which is a meeting on vision in research and ophthalmology, which is occurring, as I said, in April, down in New Orleans. And we have a nice presentation going on there on those first 120 patients and really have a lot more clarity on how we expect the first Phase III study to read out.