James Michael Drickamer - Director of Investor Relations Mark S. Siegel - Chairman and Member of Executive Committee William Andrew Hendricks - Chief Executive Officer and President John E. Vollmer - Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Senior Vice President of Corporate Development

J. Marshall Adkins - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division James D. Crandell - Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC, Research Division Joe Hill - Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. Securities, Inc., Research Division Robin E. Shoemaker - Citigroup Inc, Research Division John M. Daniel - Simmons & Company International, Research Division Brad Handler - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division Waqar Syed - Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Research Division Brian Uhlmer - Global Hunter Securities, LLC, Research Division Tom Curran - Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Research Division John R. Keller - Stephens Inc., Research Division Jason A. Wangler - Wunderlich Securities Inc., Research Division Alan D. Laws - BMO Capital Markets U.S.

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q3 2012 Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. Earnings Conference Call. My name is Marie, and I'll be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded for replay purposes. I would like to turn the call over to Mike Drickamer, Director of Investor Relations. Please proceed, sir.

Thank you, Marie. Good morning, and on behalf of Patterson-UTI Energy, I'd like to welcome you to today's conference call to discuss the results of the 3 and 9 months ended September 30, 2012. Participating in today's call will be Mark Siegel, Chairman; Andy Hendricks, President and Chief Executive Officer; and John Vollmer, Chief Financial Officer. Again, just a quick reminder that statements made in this conference call, which state the company's or management's intentions, beliefs, expectations or predictions for the future, are forward-looking statements. It's important to note that actual results could differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, deterioration of global economic conditions; declines in customer spending and in oil and natural gas prices that could adversely affect demand for the company's services and their associated effect on rates, utilization, margins and planned capital expenditures; excess availability of land drilling rigs and pressure pumping equipment, including, as a result of reactivation or construction, adverse industry conditions, adverse credit or equity market conditions; difficulty in integrating acquisitions; shortages of labor, equipment, supplies and materials; supplier issues; weather; loss of key customers; liabilities from operations; government regulation and ability to retain management and field personnel. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained from time to time in the company's SEC filings, which may be obtained by contacting the company or the SEC. These filings are also available through the company's website and through the SEC's EDGAR system. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement. Statements made in this conference call include non-GAAP financial measures. The required reconciliations to GAAP financial measures are included on our website, www.patenergy.com, and in the company's press release issued prior to this conference call. And now, it's my pleasure to turn the call over to Mark Siegel for some opening remarks. Mark?

Thanks, Mike. Good morning, and welcome to Patterson-UTI's conference call for the third quarter of 2012. We are pleased that you are able to join us today. As is customary, I will start by briefly reviewing the financial results for the quarter ended September 30, and then I will turn the call over to Andy Hendricks, who will share some detailed comments on each segment's operational highlights, as well as our outlook. After Andy, I will provide some closing remarks before turning the call over for questions. Turning now to the third quarter, as set forth in our earnings press release issued this morning, we reported net income of $50.8 million or $0.33 per share for the third quarter ended September 30, 2012, and $241 million or $1.56 for the 9 months ended September 30. EBITDA was $232 million for the quarter and $792 million for the 9 months. The financial results for the third quarter include charges that combines and negatively impact third quarter earnings by $0.06 per share. These charges include $12.5 million -- include a $12.5 million impairment charge from the retirement of 36 drilling rigs and approximately 37,000 horsepower of Pressure Pumping equipment. Additionally, there was a $978,000 of pretax interest charges related to the refinancing of our bank credit agreement. The refinancing of our bank agreement increased the term of the loan to 5 years, increased the size of our revolver by $100 million to $500 million and lowered our interest rate by 50 basis points. We also secured a $100 million 5-year term loan, which we intend to drop on in December. We ended the quarter with $83.5 million in cash. During the quarter, we repurchased 2.4 million shares of our common stock for approximately $39 million. Since the beginning of the second quarter…

Thanks, Mark, and good morning to everyone. I'll start this morning with some commentary on our drilling business. As Mark mentioned, revenues from Contract Drilling represent approximately 2/3 of our total company revenues. Within our land drilling, revenues decreased 3% sequentially to $447 million due to the softness in U.S. rig demand. In the U.S., our average rig count decreased to 211 rigs in the third quarter from 224 in the second quarter, while our Canadian activity increased to 5 rigs from less than 1 rig in the second quarter. The Canadian increase was less than anticipated due to the slower-than-expected seasonal recovery in Canada. Our average revenue per day was better than expected, declining by only $120 while daily operating costs did not fall as much as we had expected. Our average rig margin per day fell by only $90 sequentially, which is pretty close to our expectation that daily margins will be flat. Our daily averages were affected by many different moving pieces with the largest impact being rigs on customer requested standby. Of the average of 211 rigs in the U.S., approximately 10 were on standby. And standby rigs received a discounted day rate and have lower cost than active rigs. On the other hand, daily revenue was enhanced by a higher proportion of Apex rigs and increased activity in Canada. Our average daily operating costs did not decrease as much as expected as labor costs were higher than expected. First, some of the higher labor cost was transitory in nature; and second, we chose not reduce our headcount at the same rate that our rig count fell during the quarter as we made the decision to retain skilled people from these rigs. We have invested heavily on hiring the right people and training them well, and…

Thanks, Andy. There's a quote that has been popularly attributed to Warren Buffet, that goes something along the lines of, you never know who is swimming naked until the tide goes out. In a cyclical business, it's easy to point at the value of your investments are created when times are good. But I tend to believe that you do not realize the true value until there is a slowdown. We have invested in our business throughout the cycle in order to fundamentally transform our company and despite the slowdown in the third quarter, we performed well. Since the beginning of 2006, we have built 107 Apex rigs. Rig demand softened during the third quarter but nonetheless, our Apex rigs were able to achieve better than 95% utilization. We have increased the horsepower in our Pressure Pumping fleet by more than 1,000% since the beginning of 2006. Despite concerns about the health of the Pressure Pumping industry, our Pressure Pumping business generated $48.6 million of EBITDA achieving almost a 27% EBITDA margin. Beyond investing in equipment for our 2 core businesses, we have also invested in our people. We continue to focus on hiring the right people, implementing new training programs and retaining the right people. While we have been making these investments, I'm proud of the fact that we have also returned capital to shareholders. This year alone, we have repurchased $109 million worth of our stock or approximately 5% since the beginning of the second quarter, and we still have $111 million remaining under our share repurchase authorization. This year, we will distribute approximately $120 million in dividends. Since the beginning of 2006, we have returned more than $1 billion to shareholders in share repurchases and dividends. Going forward, we will continue to balance further Apex newbuilds with…

[Operator Instructions] And we have our first question and it comes from the line of Marshall Adkins from Raymond James. J. Marshall Adkins - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Help us to understand directionally where we should be thinking about the day rates and really, more daily margins going forward. There's so many moving parts there right now with new contracts coming online and they're higher priced, leading ad rate is coming down, cost probably coming down. Give us some sense of what you guys are thinking for the next quarter or 2 in terms of the trend on day rates and really, daily margins.

So that's a good question. We get a lot of conversation about day rates. It's actually quite interesting. You're right when you say there are a lot of moving parts here. As we talked about in what we see going forward for Q4, we have a mixture of some term contracts coming off. We have the mixture of some Apex rigs and different things that are moving within the numbers on the averages. But as I stated, we just don't see a lot of movement in the spot prices on a well to well basis, depending on the region or the basin in the U.S. from well to well. Some might go up, some might go down but on average, they're just not moving a lot, so relatively flat on the spot prices. And on some of the new contracts that we've got, we just don't see a lot of movement on what we're doing for new Apex rigs. Mark, do you want to add to that?

No, I think that's a fair comment. The fact is, Marshall, that there's a lot of factors that were affecting both average daily revenue and the average margin in the quarter. We try to highlight a couple of them, but there's a lot of different numbers going in a lot of different directions, frankly. J. Marshall Adkins - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Right. So, I mean, I guess most of us are probably thinking obviously directionally margins are going to head lower. It sounds like, in your mind, if it doesn't move lower, it's not a lot lower, is that fair?

Yes. Well, you saw what we're talking about and are looking forward to the fourth quarter. The remarks that we've given were that for relatively modest changes. And we're talking about a kind of a decrease of $500 a day and total revenue and margin of 3 -- of $2.50, that's pretty modest, I think. J. Marshall Adkins - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Yes, it is. That's why I was asking. All right. The second one is same thing on Pressure Pumping, and I guess I'm a little surprised. I think you mentioned 100 basis point decline in margins on Pressure Pumping. We're hearing a lot of guys out there maybe bidding it at a breakeven cost, stuff like that. You guys have held up a lot better, and it sounds like you would expect that to be going forward, could you give a little -- more color on that?

Yes, so that's another interesting one as well. So our Pressure Pumping, we're in 2 regions. We're in the Northeast and Appalachia and we're in the Southwest. And with our customer base, we've been steady with the customers that we have. Our bigger challenge in Q3 was more around utilization than it was on pricing. In the April call, we said that our average pricing was coming down around 20%, and I think that still holds true for our average pricing. Certainly the spot market pricing has been a lot more competitive, but we haven't had to compete so much on the spot market. And again, Q3 for us, utilization challenge. And Q4, as we get into holiday season, potential weather in the Northeast, it will still be a bit of utilization challenge there as well, similar to Q3.

And our next question comes from the line of James Crandell with Dahlman Rose. James D. Crandell - Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC, Research Division: Andy, if I heard you right, of your new Apex rigs, you've been able to get 21 of the 23 under long-term contracts and then pushed 2 into early next year. Assuming that's right, are you moving out bidding on shorter-term work than 3 years with any of your Apex rigs? And again, if I heard you right, the day rates that you'll be getting recently on these term contract is very, very similar to those of a year ago?

Yes, Jim, so just to clarify we deferred 1 additional Apex into next year, so it gives us a total of 7 in the newbuild program to start for next year. With regards to the contracts on the newbuilds, I think, we don't get into the details of exactly all the terms. Certainly, there's been a little bit more pressure on the nature of the term of the contract than there has been on the pricing of the contract, and pricing is holding relatively steady for the new Apex contracts. James D. Crandell - Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC, Research Division: But you're not bidding any of the new rigs on what you would call short-term work?

We're certainly not putting newbuild rigs on the spot market. The newbuild rigs are getting term contracts. James D. Crandell - Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC, Research Division: Okay. And could you -- just sort of a follow-up to that, Andy, is could you differentiate a bit on, in your Pressure Pumping business, market conditions in the Eagle Ford, Permian and Appalachia and maybe contrast -- compare and contrast them?

Okay. Yes, very different markets. Appalachia was certainly challenged with natural gas prices. We've seen that work its way up a little bit, and I think it's taken some of the pressure off Appalachia and gives us some encouraging signs as we come out of Q3 and into Q4. But again, we're just concerned that we're going to run into some utilization issues in Q4 with holidays and if we get some good rains in the Northeast at the same time in the fall. In the Southwest, we see a bit of a spending shift from Permian to Eagle Ford, but I think we're well set up in both of those markets, and we have the ability to move between those 2 markets easily. So I think we see continuing challenges in the markets with the oversupply in general across all the basins. But right now, we're just focused in Appalachia and Southwest. And our guys are doing a good job, and they're holding their own in those basins. James D. Crandell - Dahlman Rose & Company, LLC, Research Division: Could you remind me, Andy, your last spread of equipment that you took delivery of. Is that working or have you held that off the market?

So we have just under 100,000 horsepower that we have -- by the end of the year, when all the deliveries come in from last year's orders, it will be just under 1,000 horsepower that we will have taken delivery of that we have not activated. In other words, haven't spent the money to invest and accrue them up or haven't got -- put that equipment to work. So that equipment is sitting nicely in West Texas and nothing's going to happen to it. And we don't have any plans at this time to activate that equipment. We just have to wait and see how the market plays out.

And our next question comes from the line of Joe Hill from Tudor, Pickering. Joe Hill - Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. Securities, Inc., Research Division: Guys, we've benefited from this kind of this inertial drift in term rates for, I don’t know, 2 years plus, where you've had the older contracts fall out of your term bucket at lower rates, and your incremental term contracts have been at higher rates. So it's been very supportive of your blended day rate. It sounds like maybe we're seeing an inflection point where that effect is flipping to the negative. Am I correct in that observation?

No, I think that it really all depends on when the term contract was signed and for what region it was signed. And we were extremely -- we found ourselves in an extremely fortunate position in late 2009, particularly for rigs going into certain of our markets, where we were very strong and people wanted specific rigs that we had, and we were very fortunate in some very advantageous contracts that were, in fact, above what was then the average price for term contracts. Some of those are rolling off and being reset at numbers that are more in line with current market. So yes, you can see in our numbers some of those, and that's why we used the word limited number of these rigs. So I think that, that you're correct, that there are some of them. To then go to the next step and say that these particular instances give you a trend line will be something I'd be a little uncomfortable with because I think it all depends on which rig under which circumstance. I think that, in effect, term rig that -- or term contract expires that's re-termed by the, in effect, customer for an additional term. We haven't seen all that much change in that marketplace. So that's why I'm being a little hesitant. We've seen some in particular instances but not across the board. Andy, do you want to add to that?

No, Mark. That's a -- as we said before, there's a lot of moving parts as you well know. And I think Mark described that one pretty well. Joe Hill - Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. Securities, Inc., Research Division: Okay. And then you guys saw what I think is pretty nice success in the quarter and picking up 11 more term contracts. For the fourth quarter, your guidance went from 121 to 132. To what do you attribute your success in doing that?

I guess, we'd like to think that we're doing a good job for our customers, and they are satisfied with the work that we provide and the service we provide. Joe, I really can't explain it any other way than to say that I think that it reflects the customer's acceptance of the service we provide. Joe Hill - Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. Securities, Inc., Research Division: And that's the best possible answer. And finally, for me, Andy, you talked a little bit about Pressure Pumping, maybe feeling a little bit better than it has been. Early fourth quarter activity picking up from Q3, and then we'll of course get the seasonal follow-up. What's driving the improvement from Q3 here, what's kind of the change?

I think coming out of Q3, we had some -- again, in Q3, had some spotty utilization where customers were telling us instead of frac-ing 6 days a week, we want to dial that back to 5 and 4, and -- so that hit us on both the revenue and margin and Pressure Pumping. But I think that with natural gas trading in the mid to upper 3, that's giving some support to some more work up in Appalachia, and we're just continuing on in Southwest at the same time.

And our next question comes from the line of Robin Shoemaker from Citigroup.

I just wanted to ask about -- going back to this market for a AC drive rigs. We now know there's quite a few stacked AC drive rigs in the industry -- industry-wide. The figure I heard yesterday was 94, but I don't if it's a good estimate. But it's clearly putting some downward pressure on spot rates, and there's a lot of term contracts that are coming up for expiration. So, clearly, your experience here is definitely better. But do you foresee having to get, on your expiring contracts, more competitive? Assuming that they're going to be put into a kind of a spot market environment.

I think, the first point of -- the way we would, perhaps, start out by thinking about Robin, is I'm not sure we agree with your premise, that there's this huge amount of AC powered rigs that's available, and in effect, being laid down. Our figures show that the utilization of the AC rigs is something in the high 80s, or at least mid-80s, and therefore, we don't see numbers of the sort that you're giving us. And, certainly, we don't have those as a company, that oversupply of rigs. And so, quite frankly, we think that there's actually a sense, on our customers part, that there are not -- and there certainly are rigs in the marketplace that are idle. I'm not trying to quarrel with that. But the sense that there's an overabundance of idle rigs of the highest quality is the part that I think I'm quarreling with, a little bit, in your question.

Overall, the industry, Mark's right. We pull up some of the numbers and it's in the upper 80s on the total AC utilization. Of our Apex rigs, we're seeing 95%. So, our Apex rigs are certainly very competitive in the market, and we only have 1 AC down right now.

Okay. Just if I may ask a little kind of a parallel question to that. We hear a lot about some smaller startup companies, private equity backed, that are introducing new AC drive rigs into the marketplace at a time when -- their timing of those introductions is not great timing. So in other words, they're kind of between a rock and a hard place, and have to discount those rates pretty aggressively. And I'm not exactly sure exactly where they're marketing those rigs, but do you see that phenomenon affecting the marketplace, I guess, is my basic question.

You know, I don’t really see a big effect there. If you look at what it takes to operate a fleet of AC rigs across the country, when you look at an AC rig versus another type of rig, the level of assembly, commissioning, maintenance and technical support, long-term, for a rig like that at a much different level than previous classes of rigs. And I think that we, certainly, have the infrastructure, across North America, to be able to handle the support for this type of fleet of rigs.

I would just add that, firstly we've seen, at least I have over a number of years in this industry, private equity build new rigs from time to time. Historically, and I believe it's the case again this time, it's a very limited number of rigs. That it doesn't have much impact on the overall rig business, and certainly not on company of our size. Quite frankly, the startups are challenged in the same way that Andy just described because they're facing the problems that we have a chance to deal with because of our size, including training, insurance, all kinds of other things that, in effect, are our advantages that they don't have. And so, yes, they come into a marketplace, they can have some impact, but also, I think our customers are rather reluctant, particularly the established customers, to want to use people who don't have much on a history. Let me just clarify one thing from the prepared remarks. I said that, after the fourth quarter our dividend distribution would be $120 million, I should have said will be $30 million during this year. That's a mistake on our part, and my apologies for it. But that the distribution, this year, would be approximately $30 million. It doesn't change any of the other numbers that I gave.

And our next question comes from the line of Tom Daniels from Simmons and Co.

As you well know, a couple of your larger frac competitors were pretty aggressive with their bidding over the past 2 quarters. In hindsight, it seems that they may have overdone it, with the price cutting. Are you seeing any signs that they might be trying to work their pricing back higher?

We're certainly encouraged by some of the things that we're hearing. But I would say, today, it's still a very competitive market out there. Certainly, we hear, in the Northeast there's in the range of 20 spreads that are still on the sidelines up there. And that's why I really got to commend our pressure pumping teams for the work that they're doing and the good service their providing, because they're doing a good job for the customers out there, that we have, and that work is still progressing. So I would say that we haven't seen a change in the market yet, but we're certainly encouraged by some of the things we're hearing.

John, I'd just add to what Andy just said. It's kind of interesting, we started out by saying we were really proud of our company and how we've performed in this difficult market environment. I would say that one of the things that the management team is most proud of is how well our Pressure Pumping business has performed in an extremely competitive market. I might even describe it as hypercompetitive marketplace. And they've done so, I think, by being able to, in effect, provide the customer a better value equation. And a better value equation is that we don't necessarily have to charge you the cheapest price, but the overall value of what we provide is superior. And I think that's been what's sort of seen us through this rather difficult time, and why we have quite as much margin compression as some other people have.

And certainly from our standpoint, we don't see the need to chase work on the spot market, and that's why we have the new horsepower, that we have, just parked and not activated. John M. Daniel - Simmons & Company International, Research Division: Fair enough. Okay. I know you don’t want to call bottom on margins. But given your belief that activity increases next year, do you sense that your frac margins will move higher in Q1? Assuming no major weather issues. Or is there a risk that contracted pricing rolls in and kind of take that down from Q4?

I think we're reluctant to make those claims, John, because of the amount of equipment on the sidelines and the number of competitors who may be, in effect, inclined to do desperate things. You hear certain competitors who are making comments about not being as price conscious and price competitive, and market share driven, as they were. But, yet, you know that the marketplace has a lot of other players, and you can't really predict, 2 quarters, out with those players are all going to do. So I think that's why are cautious about those remarks. John M. Daniel - Simmons & Company International, Research Division: Okay, last one for me. Is there any we could frame for us just the current split between your cash margins, contracted versus spot? Even if it's a range.

I don't think we have that information in hand. I'm looking at John and I don't think we have it, John. Sorry.

And our next question comes from the line of Brad Handler from Jefferies & Co. Brad Handler - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: Can you please split out the $12.5 million in between Contract Drilling and Pumping?

It's approximately half and half. Brad Handler - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: Okay. Thank you. So, I guess a point of clarification for me. In your guidance, relative to, say Pressure Pumping margins. If I take $6 million out of the expense line for the third quarter, and I get a 32% EBITDA margin in pumping, is that the reference point that you're guiding us to relative to Q4 down 100 bps? Is that the way I should be thinking of it or is it -- assuming no add-back and so I think it's closer to 29%?

The comparative number for the third quarter's 29% going to 28%, is the estimate. We're just taking Pressure Pumping revenue less Pressure Pumping direct cash cost, and we are considering G&A for that purpose. Brad Handler - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: Okay. But the important thing is the -- yes, I think I've got it. The reference point does not add back the impairment charges. You're looking at that as part of your ongoing -- that's your third quarter number and your working from that.

I think, we're not considering depreciation when we're giving you the margin. We're looking at a gross profit, in effect percentage, which is in revenue, for our purposes, less cash cost. We're not talking about the depreciation number in that.

Yes, and the depreciation, I think, John, correct this if I'm wrong, is in the G&A number.

Well, no, it's just the way they're broken up, the numbers he has, you revenue, you have effect cost of sales, you got G&A and you got depreciation. And we're, for purposes, 100 basis points. We're not speaking to G&A nor depreciation. Brad Handler - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: All right, I think I got it. But the point is it's $129 million you reported in costs?

Yes. Brad Handler - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: So revenues less that number is your margin is 29%, roughly I think, and then it's 100 basis points off that?

Right. Yes, correct. Brad Handler - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: Second question, unrelated. I guess, what can you tell us about the strategy on the new build front, in a couple of ways? Obviously, you said you've got to -- I understand you've got to formalize the budget before you commit to numbers. But, I guess roughly speaking, maybe you can comment about -- is there a minimum level of activity, which is just sort of logical? That means you put out an Apex during the quarter or something more like that anyway? And I guess I'd also appreciate if you could speak to the idea of adding walking systems onto mechanical rigs and how you think about the opportunity set for that. That hasn't got any discussion on our call, but obviously, that's an option as well, if I understand it.

Sure. Let me take the walking systems second, and completely separate from the conversation about new build rigs. So, as respects to new build rigs, Brad, your first comment was absolutely correct. We typically have set our capital budget in December and have our board approve it at that point. We have not, obviously, done that yet, and we won't do that until then. But we have, obviously, these 7 deferred rigs that are carrying forward from our, in effect, 2012 approved budget. So that's, in effect, been approved by our board in there. What we kind of anticipate, but this of course is, at this point, more or less kind of a swag, is that we'll build about 2 rigs per month in the first half of the year. And that's totally consistent with the rate of building in 2012, and so it seems like a very logical expectation for us. Obviously, we have the ability to adjust that number, upwards or downwards, depending on what we see in terms of demand. We're not going to outbuild the market, we're going to be cautious about that. But we're also pretty darn optimistic about our customers interest in these new rigs and the demand for them. So that's kind of a broad oversight, if you will, of the new build. As respects to walking rigs, I have sort of, I guess maybe 2 or 3 comments. The first is that, as you know I'm sure, our original walking rigs are really the industry standard, and we're now seeing some of our competitors really move to try to kind of, in effect, build very similar to rigs that we have been building for a number of years. And where we think we have a very significant competitive advantage, in terms of a certain kind of walking rig. Number two, we've been able to put walking rigs on others of our new AC electric rigs, and adapt them, so that they can have walking systems which allow them to do all the traditional kinds of walking. I see no reason why we couldn't do that for our mechanical rigs as well. But I would say that we're probably the contractor with the greatest ability, and the greatest amount of their fleet already set up for walking, and so we're well positioned in that area already. Brad Handler - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: I understand. So the take away is that, sure you have the option to do that, but that's not something you necessarily need to feel that you have to catch up on, right?

You got it. We have the lead -- we're certainly not playing catch-up. In the Apex walking rigs, we have 55 currently on the market. And just to clarify what walking means, walking means on a pad, that you can move in both the X and Y direction. You can move in 2 directions, this is not a skid. The skid just moves in 1 direction. So we have 55 of the Apex Walking Rigs out there today. The Apex 1000 was originally built with an option for a walking package, and we recently updated an investor presentation to show that the Apex 1500, which is a bigger fast-moving rig, also now has an option for a walking package. And that option that we did for the Apex 1500 can be retrofitted to any of the SCRs or mechanical rigs in the fleet if necessary, or if required by a customer. Brad Handler - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: Understand. I feel like I might be speaking in one more too many. But any comments on the Canadian drilling renegotiations for the winter season? Can you comment on rates in that context?

We're not seeing any change in the rates, we're just seeing a softer market up there. We're slow to come out of break-up in the summer, as everybody saw. And that we're not forecasting the peak that we saw last year basically. Brad Handler - Jefferies & Company, Inc., Research Division: So a slower winter drilling season?

In general.

And our next question comes from Waqar Syed from Goldman Sachs.

I just want to check with you on Appalachia, you mentioned some pickup in activity. Is that related to companies going back and completing wells that they had previously drilled or is this some of the new wells that have been drilled, where you're getting some market share?

So, in Appalachia, I think what you're seeing right now has more to do with people getting comfortable with where the commodity prices are and the range they're in right now. And we see some increase in the utilization from that. We're not adding frac spreads up there, it's just that frac spreads that we have are getting a little bit busier in their scheduling, and utilization is improving. What you're asking, with regards to going back to older wells to add fracs or add stages where, initially, it might have been just that tow that was frac-ed. We don't see that yet, per se. So I wouldn't say that's a driver in what's happening. I think there maybe some potential in that 2013, but it's not a driver or material to the number that were talking about, right now, in Q3 or what we see in Q4.

Okay. So, in your view, as commodity prices came down, based on the rig count, what was your jobs your seeing like reduced number of frac stages versus what you saw early in the year or last year?

Like I said earlier, what we saw in Q3 was, really, it looked like people were just staying very close within their budget numbers. Maybe potentially a little bit constrained. And we just saw the utilization drop where -- not so much fracs per well, but just overall number of fracs, in general, were coming down. And the effect on us is we would frac 4 or 5 days a week, instead of 6 or 7 days a week, or from long daylight hours to reduced daylight hours.

And is there a way to quantify your utilization for the equipment that you've activated now, on the Pressure Pumping side?

We haven't activated any new equipment.

No, in terms of what is already activated. What it is, today, being marketed. What is the utilization level for that equipment?

It's actually a difficult number to get to because it depends on the well types that you're frac-ing, the regions, the basins and things like that. We look at how the schedules are filling out. And like I said, coming out of Q3 into Q4, we're seeing the schedules fill out, but were very cautious on utilization in Q4 because we know we'll get into a seasonal aspects and also potential weather issues in the Northeast.

Okay. And then just one final question. What do you need to see to activate your non-marketed pressure pumping fleet? The new fleet that you've recently built.

In general, I think for us to activate another fleet, we would have to see some kind of contract and pricing level, similar to what we're getting today, whether it's Northeast our Southwest. Because, like I mentioned earlier, we just don't see a need to go chase contracts at the spot market just to put equipment at work at low margins. We're still staying very focused on the margins in that business.

And our next question comes from the line of Brian Uhlmer from Global Hunter.

I have a couple questions, following up on your swimming naked line. I'd like to address 2 topics in the industry, and the first one I want to talk about is shrinkage. And with you guys dropping 37,000-horsepower, something along those lines, do you still feel like that that's could happen industry-wide? And what kind of estimates do you have, in the industry, as to what portion of it could potentially be cut up and go away? To maybe help balance out the market.

That's an interesting question. You bring up a good point. It's hard for us say what other fleets look like. In our particular case, we had a mixture of some older equipment that we had on yards. We just didn't anticipate it going back to work. In some cases, some smaller body load pumps for maybe some other types of services. We do more than just frac, we have some inning, we have acidizing, we have nitrogen and so we have a variety of different kind of pumps and quantities of horsepower, per se, out there and we just looked at some of the older, small equipment and decided, in today's market, we just didn't see that going back to work.

Now with your experience in the industry, do you feel like there could be -- we could start to see that, potentially, as we go out into Q4 and '13, from some competitors?

I think it's a possibility. I think it depends on relative ages of fleets that are out there with some of the other companies. But I would say, it's a possibility.

Okay. Following up on the same topic. When we talk about some of the guys at the lower ends who have private equity sponsors and who are kind of forcing pricing down, and as you say, got potentially caught naked. What do we see happening with all these naked fellas moving throughout the year? Is there going to be consolidation? Do you think the private equity sponsors back them or are there opportunities for Patterson to do consolidation as well?

Well, we're always trying to find good opportunities to, in effect, acquire assets at attractive prices. So that if, in fact, that does materialize, we'd be very interested. Quite frankly, in predicting how private equity sponsors will respond to this kind of a situation, it seems to me to be one of the harder, if not impossible, tasks. You just don't know whether someone will say, look I think it's going to get good next week, next month, next year, whatever period of time, and decide to stay the course, and to in effect, pour more money. Or whether people will stay, hey, wait let's just take a graceful exit. I don't know what will be the case. And Brian, as much as I'd like to make a good prediction on this one, my experience in doing transactions, which is pretty darn long at this point, is that unit they come along unexpectedly. And when they do, the thing that really marks the difference between some people and others is ability to seize the day and understand how to really react well to do the ones that you really want to react well to, and understand what you need to pass on.

Sounds good. And there's been no change to your stance? That you're not collecting assets just to collect them, they would have to be a pretty steep discount in order to do something in that pressure pumping arena.

I give this sort of answer that you know, which is the one that -- when you buy assets, you're thinking to yourself, am I creating value for the shareholders. And just own on more of anything, a truck, a rig, a pressure pump, a piece of equipment wouldn't be of value. Owning something that could generate revenue and profit is what makes something valuable.

And our next question comes from the line of Tom Curran from Wells Fargo.

Returning to the line of investigation by Brad, earlier on the Walking Rig System technology. I think of your leadership there, technologically speaking, inextricably linked to your long-standing leadership in Appalachia. Could you speak to where we're starting to see the incremental demand emerge outside of Appalachia for walking rig technology and where, ultimately, you see the most growth potential for it?

Sure. I just would like to start out by kind of making an observation, which is that the first 10 of our walking rigs were built for the Rockies in 2005, 2006. I believe that the first one that was, in effect, deployed outside of the Rockies was in the Barnett. And then the rigs actually sort of migrated, they didn't walk, I would tell you. They migrated to Appalachia and were obviously successful. We were actually asked to take some of the technology, which we had pioneered in the Rockies and later brought to the Barnett, to Appalachia, which was extremely successful when brought there. And so we've been doing this, and the real point of the 2005, '06 starting point is to say that, we're into this with a lot of experience over kind of 6, 7 year basis. So that's why I gave the answer that I gave the first time to Brad, which is that we don't see ourselves as having to chase anybody in terms of leadership positions or walking positions. We think we're pretty well established in that as an industry leader.

And thank you for the clarification, it's very helpful. But from this point forward, especially given you're 1 of only 2 drillers, thus far, that's reported incremental new build contracts. And all of the ones we've heard about, thus far, have been for walking rigs. Where are you seeing incremental demand, now, outside of Appalachia?

I'll toss this to Andy as well. But my reaction is we're seeing demand for both walking rigs and not walking rigs. We're seeing demand in Appalachia. We're seeing demand outside of Appalachia. So it's not that it's A or B, or X or Y.

Yes, I don’t want to bring it down to the basin level. But I'll say it's really kind of operator dependent, in how they choose to develop their field and if they choose to put a number of wellheads together or just a few wellheads together, and different operators have different strategies in different basins. But, certainly, we have several different options for them.

Okay, good to hear. While I'm on Appalachia, it seems like it would be the first market to see a turn in demand, in response to the sustained rebound we've had in gas prices. And again, as a leader there, I would think you guys are the best positioned to know what the operators -- what it might take, and therefore, when they might move. What's the latest you're hearing?

Well, we're definitely encouraged, both from the commodity prices and where they're trading today in the range, and then also with discussions with customers up in Appalachia. I think, like we said, it's too early to call a bottom on things, but we are in some encouraging discussions.

And our next question comes from the line of John Keller from Stephens, Inc.

Just one quick one. I think everything else has really been answered. You're obviously pretty optimistic, it sounds like, about 2013. And I think you cited discussions with customers. But is there anything beyond that, that you can sort of shed a light on, why you have that kind of a bullish stand and why you think -- flip of the calendar is going to bring a brighter day, if you will?

We've really talked to you about the fact that we're very much customer driven. And when our customers talk to us about the fact that they foresee the possibility of incremental rigs needed. And going forward, when they talk about incremental frac work they expect to do, various other things, it encourages us. Now, there's a big difference between a contract and a conversation. Right now, we're having some contracts and some conversations. We're hopeful that more of the conversations will turn to contracts, but we're encouraged because we've had a pretty good success rate in doing that.

Fair enough. And I mean what would be the major things -- I mean, obviously, commodity prices -- but what do you think fails to turn those conversations into contracts?

I, frankly think -- and I don't think I have any particular special insight here. I think that the EMP companies are looking at their budgets and trying to make some real hard decisions about what they think the direction of the economy is and what the direction of commodity prices are. And that, to me, is what I think is going on.

And I think what we saw this year, so far, we just saw some challenges as we moved through some commodity bumps in the road, in May and June, and in the budget season and it was just a more challenging environment to make some decisions on forward progress as far as drilling plans. But we're in some encouraging discussions right now.

And we have another question, and it comes from the line of Jason Wangler from Wunderlich Securities.

Just had a quick question as far as the 100,000 horsepower that you have kind of idle or not running, at least. Could you just kind of give some color,, maybe, on how much that would cost, and maybe the timing of when you could get back into service, when you saw that timing be present itself I guess.

There's two things. It's under 100,000 horsepower, and it's really a market condition question. And for us, the right opportunity at the right price would have to come along for us to activate that. So we're, certainly, always on the lookout for opportunity. But, as we said before, we're not chasing work at the spot price. And the only real cost for us to activate that is just the upfront cost of bringing the people on board.

And we have our last question, it comes from the line of Alan Laws from BMO Capital.

More of a philosophical question on the finish-off here. You've been putting up what I would consider differentiated results, especially relative to your own experience in prior cycles. You've been balancing return of capital and reinvestment in the fleet. You have a good balance sheet. You're recognized, really, as a preferred vendor out there. Why not use the opportunities in this interim slowdown to accelerate your new rig investment? Sort of take more share or even better position yourself in the future. The stock's already kind of discounting bad stuff, so it can't hurt that much more.

Well, I personally want to thank you for the positive comments that were implicit in the question. And secondly, say to you that I think we're kind of doing what's gotten us to this point. We balance, as I see it, between, in effect, reinvesting in our business by increasing our rig fleet. Historically, increasing our frac fleet, we're not looking to do that right now, but we have done it. And at the same time, give back capital to shareholders. Quite frankly, when John and I were doing the kind of work that leaves behind over $1 billion return to shareholders, we're pretty blown away by the size of that number, particularly in light of the amount of money that's been reinvested in the business. So I kind of think we're going to keep doing what they've been doing. And I recognize your comment could be, well you could do more of it. But, frankly, what we've been doing has been working for us pretty darn well and I think we're, pretty clearly, going to try to stay on that path.

Well, ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much for joining us. We very much appreciate everyone's participation in this call. We look forward to speaking to you again in the next quarter. Thank you.

Thank you ladies and gentlemen, that concludes our conference call for this afternoon. Thanks for joining us, and you may now all disconnect.