Arun Menawat
Analyst · Lake Street Capital Markets
Thank you, Tom, and good afternoon, everyone. Today, our company is evolving rapidly. We believe that hurdles to change are dropping and a substantive opportunity to grow is upon us. I'm honored and delighted that Rich has joined us to lead the next phase of growth, and I welcome him on behalf of the Board of the company. Rich, Tom and Matthew already make a AAA level team and give us great confidence in Profound's future. My presentation today is a bit longer than normal. The market for prostate care is evolving, and we believe we are well positioned for the future in this era of change. I will describe the technical and financial foundation of our company as well as go over the implications of new industry agreements that we have signed in terms of their potential contributions on growth of our company. At the macro level, we believe the competitive landscape continues to favor Profound. New technologies are drawing attention to alternatives to more established treatments, which creates an opportunity for TULSA. Meanwhile, we also see new robotic entrants, including J&J and Medtronic committing substantial resources to the market. In our view, it remains too early to tell how they will differentiate themselves from Intuitive, but we believe clinical differentiation and capital efficiency will matter more over time than the size of the development budget. I want to start with why we believe TULSA is earning a place in mainstream prostate care. Our message starts with MRI precision, detailed visualization of the cancer and its boundaries, real-time temperature feedback and the ability to assess the treatment delivered at the end of the procedure. In our view, ultrasound imaging does not provide comparable visualization of cancer edges and today's robotics do not provide sufficient precision. This gives TULSA physicians an important advantage in planning and controlling ablation with pixel-by-pixel accuracy. The energy source matters as well. We believe TULSA provides the gentlest energy delivery among these approaches because we heat tissue only to the temperatures needed for cell death. Based on our internal technical comparisons, TULSA typically uses approximately 1/10 the energy of HIFU and 1/100 the energy of histotripsy technology to kill tissue. Our question with higher energy approaches is where does that additional energy go and what is the potential to damage surrounding tissue? Based on our internal assessment, we believe these limitations of other technologies are increasingly being recognized by physicians and helping by contrast, better understand the clinical value of TULSA's controlled energy delivery. TULSA gets MR feedback and adjust energy during treatment, while the urethra and the rectum are always protected via active cooling. That flexibility is central to our positioning. A physician can use TULSA for whole-gland ablation, focal ablation or anything in between. We describe this as regional ablation because the treatment can be adopted to the clinical situation across that range. The third quarter utilization data in today's release illustrates this breadth. Whole-gland treatments represent 42% of procedures, sub-total treatments 24%, hemi-gland ablation 22%, and focal therapy 12%. Physicians also used TULSA across a range of prostate conditions and sizes. Cases included prostate cancer alone, patients with both prostate cancer and BPH, recurrent malignant tissue and BPH alone. This experience reinforces our view that the platform's versatility is an important reason for physicians to invest in building a TULSA program. Putting it all together, TULSA's total available market or TAM in the United States alone is 600,000 patients per year strong, making it larger than that of other technologies. TULSA's TAM is supported strongly by clinical publications that continue to demonstrate our technology's capability to treat a wide variety of patients. As we highlighted on the second quarter call, CAPTAIN met its primary safety endpoint, demonstrating statistically superior preservation of the composite of urinary continence and erectile function at 6 months compared with robotic radical prostatectomy. Additional findings presented in July showed statistically superior preservation of flaccid penile length following whole-gland TULSA. So frankly, TULSA is already ahead clinically. But to me, the most important finding was that a TULSA patient recovers to 90% of his original state within 24 hours of the procedure, while robotic prostatectomy patients require 14 days to get there. TULSA is not only about no hospital stay, but also about fast recovery, which means dollars and cents to many patients. Looking ahead, we are targeting release of the 1-year CAPTAIN data, including recurrence and side effects at RSNA in early December. We will provide more details as the meeting approaches. Next, I would like to discuss 2 agreements that we have signed recently. First, Profound supports diagnostic-grade imaging, which gives the physicians a reliable and clear picture of the disease anatomy so that they can plan the treatment with precision. Urologists clearly understand that this new incision-less surgery world requires precision in imaging, and they are eager to get educated on how to use the precision of both MR and PSMA-PET to improve patient care. Telix has a sales team that is 10 or more times bigger than ours, and they are a pharma company with substantial educational resources. The symbiosis is that they can provide resources for education and TULSA provides the clinical justification. The combined MR and PSMA imaging platform provides the best imaging platform, bar none, so the surgeons can plan treatments with the best possible precision. Alongside working with Telix on physician education programs, we're also proud of the Profound-sponsored Let's Huddle initiative to educate patients. Earlier today, there was -- we sold out live Stretch education event, and we were honored that Montel Williams and Leonard Wheeler led it. The second agreement that we signed recently is with Cook Medical's new iMRI division. The use of MR in intervention is no longer the boogeyman that it used to be. And our relationships with Siemens and Cook are clear proof that larger companies are now investing in the development and installation of iMRI suites in hospitals. I salute Peter Polverini, who is the Vice President and Leader of Cook's iMRI division for his commitment to what we call the TULSA+ program through which his division will be selling a turnkey solution of MRI plus TULSA to users. We believe that this agreement will provide material growth to TULSA adoption. Our feedback from urologists is that they all want their own iMRI to give them the flexibility to schedule interventions. As you already know, TULSA HOPD reimbursement is already higher than that of any other technology that is used to treat prostate cancer, which in turn provides a strong financial justification to acquire a new TULSA+ iMRI suite. Simultaneously, our own sales team will continue to sell TULSA-PRO directly to the existing installed base of diagnostic-grade MRs. So let me summarize what we have accomplished so far and why we remain bullish on our company. TULSA TAM is 600,000 patients per year alone in the United States, is large and larger than that of most other technologies. Physicians want the technology that they can use in a variety of patients, not just in a small subset of men with prostate cancer and/or BPH. Today, we have physicians who have already given up on using any other technology and switch only to using TULSA for all their patients. We don't expect that every urologist will do that, but these early adopters demonstrate the potential of TULSA. Our gross margin is already above 70%. And as the installed base continues to grow, we expect recurring revenue from per patient use of our disposables will ultimately dominate our revenues. However, to get to that enviable position, capital sales matter to build the TULSA installed base. Our internal analysis also indicates that our gross margin is at least 10% points higher than those of our competitors, while the upfront capital cost of our technology is approximately 20% to 50% lower. We believe that combination creates an attractive and unique economic proposition for both Profound and our customers. CMS granted a higher Level 7 reimbursement through the TULSA Procedure in January 2025, and our revenues grew by around 50% last year. And based on our full year guidance for 2026, we expect to grow by at least 55% this year. We will provide more specific details early next year about what to expect from growth targets in 2027. But in the meantime, I can say we are pleased with the growth trajectory ahead, and we are even more confident about our success after the signing of the new agreements with Telix and Cook. Our message to investors regarding the leverageability of our business model is equally clear. Even at this early stage, we are spending less than $0.65 in sales and marketing for each dollar of revenue. By contrast, based on internal benchmarking, most of our peers typically spend more than $1 to generate $1 of revenue. We have reached this point with less than $300 million in total investment compared with investment levels that our internal benchmarking indicates are typically over $1 billion for relevant competitors. We believe this combination of capital efficiency, gross margins, recurring revenue business model and market breadth is the recipe to build profitable growth business. Looking forward ahead, standardization is key to driving better use of AI. TULSA already uses standardized MR images and surgeons already perform the procedure sitting comfortably in front of a computer monitor instead of an operating table. Putting those together, we believe that TULSA is the best suited technology to continue to grow as AI becomes more prolific and interest in new concepts, including telesurgery increases. For customers, our message is that we are not simply selling a product. We are helping them transition to the future of image-guided incisionless care with support as they become proficient. Although the barriers to establishing this platform have been fairly high, we believe our message is resonating because it is logical and backed by clinical data. After more than a decade at Profound, I believe the challenges ahead are increasingly ones of execution that we understand and can address. I do not underestimate the work, but I have confidence in the experience Rich brings and in the way he, Tom and Matthew are already working together to lead the next phase. The opportunity is substantial, and we are in a strong position to pursue it. Speaking of the team, before opening the call for Q&A, I would like to highlight the leadership announcements of today's release. Rich will succeed me as Chief Executive Officer, effective January 14, 2027. Rich is not only very experienced in growing business, but what attracts me the most is that he is very thoughtful, even-keeled and driven by his own internal thoughts to succeed. In other words, he is profound. While some of you may be surprised that I'm so old that the change happens to coincide with my 72nd birthday, but as anyone knows me will attest, I still have a strong passion to see this all the way. So I will transition to Executive Chair, supporting continuity and working with Rich and the team on strategy, Investor Relations and other priorities. We have also appointed Matthew Sobczyk as our permanent Chief Financial Officer. Matthew knows this business well, having joined Profound in 2017 and brings extensive experience in financial strategy, reporting, treasury and capital markets transactions. He will be an important partner as we allocate resources and advance towards profitability. Finally, Jason Mills is joining our Board, succeeding Cynthia Lavoie. Jason's combination of MedTech strategy and capital markets experience will be valuable as we continue to grow. I also want to thank Cynthia for her leadership and contributions to Profound. To summarize, Profound is pioneering iMRI procedures designed to improve clinical confidence, procedural control and patient outcomes. Real-time MR guidance and autonomous robotics bring consistency and clarity across treatment planning, delivery and confirmation. In prostate cancer, we believe we are crossing the chasm from early adopters to the mainstream market by establishing TULSA as a third distinct category, regional ablation. Physicians and patients can choose whole-gland or focal treatment or anything in between. The TULSA-PRO installed base was 98 at the end of Q3 2026. Our full year revenue outlook has improved from approximately $25 million to at least that level, and we also continue to expect full year gross margin to be 70% or higher. With CMS final rule for 2027, which was released last evening, the premium users are reimbursed by Medicare for TULSA over competing technologies is expanding across all treatment settings, including hospitals, ASCs and private physician practices. That will be particularly important as our TULSA+ program with Cook starts rolling out in 2027. And at the same time, more and more lives are being covered by other payers. We have assembled a strong leadership team and Board to help us execute over the long term. We continue to believe that we are on the path to profitable growth. That concludes our prepared remarks. We're happy to take your questions. Operator?