Nicholas J. Petcoff
Analyst
Thanks, Brian and good morning, everyone. Also on the call with us today is Harold Meloche. As you review our second quarter results, you'll notice a significant change in our top line figures. This is a deliberate and strategic decision on our part as we continue our shift towards a commission-based revenue model, channeling premium through our wholly-owned managing general agency, Conifer Insurance Services. Our focus is on ramping up the optimization of our commercial lines by running gross written premium through our MGA. This move aligns with our long-term strategy to achieve more stable and predictable revenue streams through commissions rather than the traditional risk-bearing carrier revenue model. While this has resulted in a lower top line compared to previous periods, it is a critical step in enhancing our overall profitability and creating a more scalable and sustainable business model. Under this model, we can leverage the expertise and network of our agency partners, enhancing our distribution channels, and expanding our reach in key markets. Through this approach, our business is directly written by third-party insurers with A.M. Best ratings of A minus or better. Utilizing third-party A-rated capacity providers for MGA-produced business provides a much broader reach for existing profitable programs, enabling us to offer insurers superior coverage and paper while simultaneously governing risk through a scalable and sustainable production-based revenue model. During the second quarter of 2024, we made significant strides in channeling premiums to our capacity providers across various commercial lines of business. Specifically, we have started to accelerate the transfer of cannabis premiums to our capacity partner, Palomar, enabling us to expand into new markets and solidify our position as a leading provider of cannabis-related coverage across the U.S. As planned, our commercial lines production decreased significantly in the second quarter compared to the prior year period. This is largely the result of more time required to ramp up our other complementary capacity providers in the period. For the quarter, our commercial lines combined ratio came in at 105% and the accident year combined ratio was a solid 81%. Overall, commercial lines represented roughly 36% of total production for the quarter. Switching to our personal lines, these results were significantly impacted in the quarter by spring storms. Most of the loss came from our Oklahoma business, which is currently in run-off. We expect that the run-off process will be largely completed by year-end. With Oklahoma going away, our production for this segment will primarily come from low-valued homeowner’s business in Texas and the Midwest. In general, personal lines production was retained through our traditional carrier-based revenue model and represented a larger percentage of gross written premium in the second quarter. We expect this trend to continue in the quarters ahead as we further transition our revenue model. Overall, we remain confident that this approach will yield market benefits over time, not only improving our margins but also equipping us to better serve our insurers and agency partners with a more flexible and responsive offering. As we continue this transition, we remain committed to preserving a strong and consistent top line, continuing to streamline our expense structure, and generating operational profitability over the long term to achieve favorable returns for our shareholders. With that, I'll turn the call over to Harold to discuss the numbers. Harold?