Good morning. My name is Kate, and I will be your conference coordinator. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the PROG Holdings, Inc. First Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] This call is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Mr. John Baugh, Vice President of Investor Relations for PROG Holdings. You may begin your conference.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to the PROG Holdings first quarter 2021 earnings call, our second as a stand-alone fintech business. Joining me this morning are Steve Michaels, PROG Holdings' President and Chief Executive Officer; and Brian Garner, our Chief Financial Officer. Many of you have already seen a copy of our earnings release issued this morning, which is available on our Investor Relations website at investor.progleasing.com. During this call, certain statements we make will be forward-looking. I want to call your attention to our safe harbor provision for forward-looking statements that can be found at the end of our earnings release. The safe harbor provision identifies risks that may cause actual results to differ materially from the content of our forward-looking statements. There are additional risks that can be found in our latest 10-K filing. Listeners are cautioned not to place undue emphasis on forward-looking statements, and we undertake no obligation to update any such statements. On today's call, we will be referring to certain non-GAAP financial measures, including EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA, non-GAAP net earnings and non-GAAP EPS, which have been adjusted for certain items, which may affect the comparability of our performance with other companies. These non-GAAP measures are detailed in the reconciliation tables included with our earnings release. The company believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful insight into the company's operational performance and cash flows and provides these measures to investors to help facilitate comparisons of operating results with prior periods and to assist them in understanding the company's ongoing operational performance. With that, I will now turn the call over to Steve Michaels. Steve?

Thanks, John, and good morning, everyone. We're excited to report our results for the first quarter of what we believe will be a pivotal year for our business, and the beginning of a return to our historical growth trajectory as the headwinds of the pandemic begin to subside. I want to start by thanking our employees for their tireless efforts to support our customers and point-of-sale retail partners as we continue to innovate and tailor our solutions to serve our customers however they choose to transact: mobile, online or in store. On our Q4 earnings call, we conveyed our excitement about the new opportunities that exist for us as a stand-alone company and our ability to drive incremental growth. We believe our first quarter results reflect the beginning of the return to GMV growth, positioning us to achieve strong 2021 results as we execute on our key initiatives. While the federal stimulus in March proved to be beneficial to the quarter's results, it is important to note that the company was on track to post results in excess of our first quarter outlook prior to the effects of the March stimulus. Revenues in the first quarter were $721 million compared to $668 million a year ago, a 7.9% increase, and were favorably impacted by elevated buyout activity and continued strong payment performance from our customers, by growth from certain large POS partners and by an increase in lease revenues generated from e-commerce platforms. Adjusted EBITDA was $118 million compared to $63 million in the year ago period. This was primarily driven by a 580 basis point decrease in write-offs as our customers continue to demonstrate increased levels of liquidity, driving delinquencies to historic lows. On the decisioning front, we continue to optimize approval rates and amounts, which are in line…

Thanks, Steve. Turning to the financial results. The first quarter's financial results exceeded our outlook on both revenue and EBITDA due to the financial strength of our consumer and the accelerated growth of GMV. While quarter-to-date results were strong heading into the last 2 weeks of March, the latest stimulus further improved our financial metrics, driving delinquencies to near-historic lows. Throughout the quarter, we experienced elevated levels of 90-day buyouts, well above historical averages. This is a continuation of a trend that we have seen over the last 12 months, as prior stimulus packages and changes in consumer behavior have driven 90-day buyouts meaningfully higher. The latest stimulus further contributed to this dynamic as we closed out the period. While 90-day buyouts placed downward pressure on margins, the increased payment activity in the period drove revenue higher and write-offs lower, more than offsetting the dilutive impact of higher 90-day buyout levels. The net result was improved consolidated adjusted EBITDA margins year-over-year of 16.4% for the first quarter of 2021 compared to 9.4% for the same period last year. As we look ahead, we are encouraged by the trends we are seeing in our portfolio performance, supporting our 2021 financial outlook, which I will touch on in a moment. Turning to the results of our Progressive Leasing segment. Net revenues for the Progressive Leasing segment in the first quarter reached a record of $708 million, an increase of $49.4 million or 7.5% compared to the first quarter of 2020. While the increased buyout and payment activity helped drive revenue higher in the period, Progressive's GMV increase of 10.4% benefited from the continued scaling of large national retail partners and increases to our e-commerce penetration. With respect to revenue headwinds in the period, as noted on our Q4 earnings call, we entered…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Kyle Joseph of Jefferies.

Congratulations on a strong recovery in the quarter. So I wanted to first touch base on GMV and just kind of get a sense for the cadences throughout the quarter. I know you guys mentioned last quarter that January and February were positive, and there were some incremental impacts from the stimulus, but just give us a sense for how that looks in March and maybe into April?

Yes, Kyle, thanks. Yes, we said on the last call that [Technical Difficulty] [Audio Gap] the through -- when we reported Q4, which was late February, we were up mid-single digits, and that was from a small but muted impact from the January stimulus and then kind of coming into earnings for Q4, we had just -- we were in the middle or towards the tail end of a pretty severe weather event in Texas, along with, as you know, a very delayed and at that point, muted tax season. So we -- those things as they usually do, kind of play themselves out. And we were on track to deliver probably mid- to high-single digits of GMV for the quarter. And then the March stimulus hit, and we did see, again, what we've experienced before, which is kind of that sugar high in applications from the liquidity that hits the consumers' accounts. And that -- it seems like each time we see it, it maybe is a little bit more fleeting or it doesn't last quite as long. So it did carry us a little bit into April and [ worked ]. But we're less concentrating on the impact of the stimulus and more on the things that we've done to help drive GMV on the decisioning front and on the product innovation front and promotional and marketing campaigns. So we're happy with where -- what we printed for Q1 and excited about what we -- what's going to happen in the rest of the year.

Got it. And then GMV, there were a number of headwinds, particularly in the fourth quarter. Some of it was brick-and-mortar exposure. Some of it was lapping challenging underwriting. And then again, there was the supply chain resolution. So in the first quarter, it sounds like you had some good e-comm growth and growth from retail partners. But did you -- it doesn't sound like you necessarily experienced the real benefits of the reopening on the retail side of the business, if I'm reading your comments correctly.

Yes. I mean, I think you listed the headwinds that we experienced in 2020 correctly. We had store closures. We had limited in-store traffic. We had some supply chain disruptions, and we also had decisioning that we make -- decisions that we made on the decisioning front. So we expect -- and we [Technical Difficulty] [Audio Gap] are going to go from headwinds to tailwinds, but we haven't experienced all of that yet. So we believe that the back half as the reopening happens more and as our e-com capabilities continue to expand, but also layered on top of that, people are out and in stores more frequently. We expect that those tailwinds will kick in more in the back half than they did in -- certainly in the first quarter. So we feel like we're set up pretty well.

Got it. One last question for me, and I'll hop back in the queue. Obviously, elevated buyout activity from stimulus, that's not surprising. But can you walk us through your experience in 2020 when you saw stimulus kind of expire at the back half of July, like how long it took for buyout activity to start to normalize in 2020 and your expectations for that kind of better factored into your '21 guide this year?

Yes, Kyle, this is Brian. I can take that. The dynamics throughout 2020, I think throughout stimulus and even well after stimulus, we saw elevated 90-day buyout activity. And I think that speaks not only to stimulus, but some changes in consumer spending patterns that allowed them additional liquidity to exercise those buyouts. So really for the better part of the last 12 months, 90-day buyouts have been elevated. And I think going forward, our expectation is that they should remain elevated, certainly not at the rate that we saw here in Q1. I think it was abnormally high, particularly with the size of the stimulus and the magnitude of the checks that got cut to these households. So it was elevated in Q1. I expect it to continue to be elevated and tapering off throughout the year. But your question about 2020 is, we saw it really since March on elevated 90-day buyouts.

The next question is from Jason Haas of Bank of America.

Congrats on the great quarter. So I wanted to dig into write-offs a little bit. I'm curious just what's implied in your guidance, and just how you're thinking about that as we move through the year?

Yes. I'm happy to take that. Certainly, the rates that we're seeing here in Q1 and what we've seen over the last couple of quarters are well below the 6 to 8% that we were accustomed to seeing. I think, obviously, it's anybody's guess on when we return to normal and when the economy kind of gets back to the way -- what we saw in 2019. But the 2.6% that we posted here in Q1, my expectations for the year, that's our low point. And we'll see somewhat of an increase as we move throughout the year. But I think when it's all said and done for the year, we'll still post below that 6% to 8%, just given the dynamics that are at play, the consumer health that we are seeing and the -- really, the liquidity that seems to be in the market right now. So that would be my expectation is somewhere below the 6% to 8%, but not hovering at these 2.5% levels.

Got it. And then as a follow-up, changing topics a bit. I'm curious if you could speak to the growth that you're seeing in e-commerce. You've made really fantastic progress there. So I'm just curious, since you laid out a target for the low- to mid teens penetration for the year. I mean if that's still the right framework? Or if there's potentially upside to that now?

Jason, yes, we're very pleased with our e-commerce business. It's a big business just by itself. And we've got great partners there and a lot more to come on the road map, not only with existing partners, but with some exciting new opportunities that we're working on. So we're not changing the guide. The guide is a more than doubling from last year. Obviously, last year ramped. So we're not expecting the -- whatever that number is, 740% year-over-year increase each quarter, but we're expecting a really, really big growth in e-comm this year. And there's certainly upside, but what we're trying to do is grow the entire pie. So we also want to grow the GMV on the rest of the channels. So that will be some of the interplay is the overall GMV growth compared to the e-comm channel GMV growth. And as we said last quarter, we expect e-comm GMV will grow faster than overall for a while to come now, but we're not targeting a particular balance of sale from any channel because we want the customer to dictate how and when they want to engage with us. And ultimately, we believe that in almost every shopping journey, there will be interaction with our digital channels, but it doesn't necessarily mean that the customer will choose to check out online or through the app. But then that's okay. We're not directing them one place or another. So we're pleased with e-comm. There's massive upside and opportunity for us there, and we look forward to continuing to report our exciting results.

The next question is from Alex Maroccia of Berenberg.

First one is on improved customer payments. As we get to the back half of the year, have you thought about a scenario where 90-day buyouts return to normal, while monthly payment activity remains high? And how beneficial would that be for margins?

Yes. So with respect to 90 days, 90 days actually put downward pressure on margins overall. And the reason why, as I said in my prepared remarks, I mean, the reason why we're seeing 16-plus percent overall EBITDA margins, is that dilutive impact of those elevated 90 days are effectively being offset by near record low write-offs and just overall health of the consumer. And so there's really that kind of give and take going on in the P&L right now within our dispositions. In isolation, 90 days are dilutive, but the net result has been strong portfolio health and higher cash-on-cash returns. So in the event that 90 days continue to be elevated, which within our guidance, we anticipate an element of that. We also anticipate that the write-offs will be below our historical ranges, like we talked about. And I think the net result is, for the year, as really implied in the guidance that we gave, is pretty strong EBITDA margins overall, a little -- an uptick a little bit from what we've seen historically. So that's kind of what's baked into the guidance, and how I'm thinking about, or how we're thinking about the 90-day dynamic in conjunction with overall portfolio performance of write-offs.

And the 90-day buyouts basically go back to normal, but we still see better-than-average payment activity. Would that be a material margin benefit in the back half?

Yes. That would be a benefit. If they went back to normal and the payment activity was to a magnitude higher, that would be a scenario that would work out well for us.

Okay. Got it. And secondly, can you just give us a sense of strength in various categories? And if any products might have been abnormally weak that could reverse in the coming quarters?

Yes. I mean, we saw strength in mobile. We saw strength in jewelry. We saw strength across most of the categories. We had various or sporadic, I would call it, supply chain issues continuing in some of the furniture categories. That was not widespread across the entire category, but in some of the retail partners, we still saw that. And so we look forward to that easing as well in the rest of the year. But just pretty good strength across the categories.

The next question is from Brad Thomas of KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Nice quarter. I got on a few minutes late getting off of another earnings call. I apologize if you addressed this. But when we think about the GMV growth of 10.4%, I know you can't know this for sure, but do you have any estimate of perhaps how much of a benefit or lift you got because of all the stimulus that was occurring in and around the quarter?

Yes, Brad, this is Steve. We talked about that, but just briefly. As we said on the call in February, we were mid-single digits up quarter to date. We believe that we would have ended the quarter mid- to high single digits up were it not for the March stimulus. And then with that stimulus, we ended up with the 10.4% print. Some -- proved to be somewhat beneficial, but not the entire story.

That's helpful. And you've obviously given clear revenue guidance for the year, but how are you thinking about GMV trends trending in the quarters ahead here?

Yes. We in the -- not in the earnings release, but in the prepared remarks, we did say that we believed GMV would come in, in the mid- to high teens for the year, and that would imply that we've printed the lowest quarter of growth already.

That's really encouraging. And my last point, just on operationally how things are working. As you talk to your partners, particularly your biggest partners, last year was a year that they obviously had to focus on operations and COVID. As you talk to them about taking tools from the progressive toolkit and leaning in and promoting and making customers aware of Progressive, what are you hearing, and how optimistic are you about your partners better utilizing Progressive [ here ] this year?

Yes. It's actually a very exciting front for us because we've seen that already, and we've seen that [ in the wild ] in Q1, and we have good plans, partnering with the partners and their marketing teams. We've seen -- we've -- to your question, we've seen partners that have not historically reached for some of our tools that -- in our toolkit, actually doing that, and that's encouraging. We've seen some co-branded marketing campaigns that the retailers haven't been interested in doing in the past, which is great, drives GMV for them and for us., We've seen some cooperative reduced IP type promotions. And so we've got -- as you know, we have a stable or a suite of solutions that they can reach for. And we're talking to them all the time about that, and we're having a lot of luck. And we've seen that already, and we've got good plans on the calendar for the rest of the year that we're excited about.

[Operator Instructions] The next question is from Bobby Griffin of Raymond James.

Congrats on the quarter. So I wanted to circle back up on GMV growth, targeting mid teens. The 2-year stack, though, does step down if you do mid teens versus kind of what you just printed in 1Q. Is that just a function of some uncertainty, and stimulus wearing off and kind of not having a crystal ball into the environment? Or are you seeing something different inside the customers that we should think about as well?

Well, yes, Bobby, I mean mid- to high teens is, we think, is pretty strong, and we certainly aren't going to be satisfied with that. We're going to work to make it more than that. From a 2-year stack standpoint, you've got to remember what happened in the back half of '19. We had really accelerating GMV growth in the back half of '19, culminating with a 35.8% GMV growth in Q4. So the quantum and the numbers in dollars really get large when you start doing that 2-year stack. And so that has certainly an influence on the growth rates this year. From a dollar standpoint, the GMV troughed in dollar terms in Q2 of 2020. And so we'll expect that Q2 will be our fastest growth rate in percentage terms, but we're looking for a really strong growth in the back half as well. And I think it has more of a function to do with what the base number is, going all the way back to '18 on a 2-year stack, than it does on what our excitement is and our expectations are for the back half of '21.

All right, that makes sense. That's very helpful. And very fair points with that 34% there in 4Q of '19. And building out that kind of GMV expectation, can you talk a little bit -- I mean, we've talked a lot about building up the e-commerce platforms for some of your big partners as well as maybe getting some of the technology where you could be the plug-and-play type things on some other platforms. Any updates on how those initiatives are going and what's assumed on timing of those to hit that mid-teens numbers?

Yes. So from a development standpoint, we've already got some of the plug-ins in the wild, and I think we put a release out on that in March. We're still on track to have basically the suite of platform plug-ins by the end of Q2. And we think that will be -- that we know that will be helpful. I'm not sure exactly how much GMV that will drive actually in '21, but it's certainly foundational efforts that we are working hard on to keep the GMV machine growing into '22. As it relates to our larger POS partners, we're working with them diligently. The tech teams are in constant contact. We don't control the timing of that completely because, obviously, when it comes to a custom integration, it's not just us throwing an API over the fence. It's a little bit more complicated than that. And so we're working with them, and we expect -- we still have a strong belief that we're going to be live in the checkout card with most of our retail partners in '21. But as the year gets deeper, it is probably less impactful to the '21 GMV and more of a '22 story. So we think that there's big upside there. But the numbers that we're looking for in '21 are not reliant on really large deliverables from those projects, because they're probably more '22 projects. I mean, there are '21 projects, but they'll deliver the GMV in '22.

All right. That's very helpful. And I guess lastly for me is just a high level industry type question. Clearly a lot of activity, new companies in the industry, capital getting thrown at the space. I mean what do you -- what is that driving in terms of what you're seeing for competing for customers, holding on to your current customers? I mean, have you seen the competitive environment drastically increase? Or has this kind of always been the case in the virtual rent-to-own space, we just didn't see it as well because most of these small players were private before, and doing kind of more quiet fundraisings and different things like that.

Maybe a little bit of both. I mean it's always been a competitive space, and we've talked extensively about how it's competitive in the SMB space in the regions, and that hasn't changed, and we expect that won't change in the future. On the enterprise side, on the larger accounts, it's been a different story. And -- but we expect we'll see some of these competitors that you're referring to more in the future than we saw in the past. It's -- there has been some excitement around the space, but in the grand scheme of things, it's been a fairly short period of time. So I can't say that we've seen material changes yet, but we're not resting because we're expecting that to happen, and we're prepared to show well.

The next question is from Michael Young of Truist.

Actually wanted to start with the first one to follow up to Bobby's question. Just as you see kind of the increased adaptation of BNPL, et cetera, across the industry. Are you seeing increased awareness of the product or maybe an increased desire for new partners to find a partner? And is that helping at all on the sales front?

Yes. I would so -- that's a great observation. I mean, I think generally, COVID was an interesting year because of BNPL and the -- basically it blew up. And whenever we have an educated retailer that understands the power of a fully developed finance stack, that's a good thing for us, especially if they don't have a lease-to-own solution. So it certainly shortens the sales cycle when you're -- there's always an education process, and we're happy to do that, and we're happy to talk about the voice of the customer work, and how the customer feels about lease-to-own, and how they feel about the retailer's brand for offering lease-to-own. But to your point, if they've looked at a BNPL product or actually installed 1 or have one, that means that they're very educated on the full -- on the power of the stack. Now on the flip side, it can actually take some mind share and some debt resources. And that can be a competing priority. And it's our job to say, well, listen, that product is a good product, and we think you should have it. But listen, the size of the prize for LTO is larger. So we think you should prioritize this ahead of that. And that's always a dance within any organization, is the prioritization stack, especially when it comes to sprints in development cycles. But on the whole, I would say it's been positive for us and for the sales cycle, just having a more knowledgeable potential retailer prospect.

That's great color. And maybe as just a follow-up, the -- if you could talk maybe just about the pipeline of potential new partners. I know after the spin, that was kind of a focus, to expand out. So just any kind of color you can give on how that's going, particularly with maybe some getting back to normal, maybe there's more resources and mental space, I think, for the partners to consider options of expansion?

Yes. I mean, we don't comment on names in the pipeline, but I can tell you that we're -- the pipeline is great, and we're talking to people all over the spectrum from the A accounts and the brands and logos that you have in your head, all the way down to super regionals and SMB accounts. And we've got teams that are focused and incentivized across the spectrum. The pipeline is good. We have expectations for pipeline conversion. I will tell you, it won't come as a surprise, but the larger the account, the -- not only the longer the sales cycle, but the longer the implementation cycle is, and we're working hard to get that, to shorten that. But we can have a win this summer that you may not hear about until 2022. But we're constantly -- it's our job to constantly be feeding that engine. So we're very excited about the pipeline and some near-term and some intermediate and longer-term opportunities that we've got.

Okay. And maybe 1 last one, if I can sneak it in. Just on EBITDA. Just trying to think about kind of the puts and takes, not from a GMV perspective, but more from just an investment perspective in technology, and anything that may be COVID-related that has been in or out of the run rate that will be coming back as we reopen?

Yes. I can take that. I mean one of -- the approach that we've taken throughout COVID and one we continue to intend to take, is protect that investment layer. That -- while we pull back on discretionary spend, the technology investment that we made throughout 2020 continued to ramp. And that's going to be an ongoing dynamic into 2021. So really, what I think you'll see as you move back more towards a normalized SG&A as a percentage of revenue, is just a step forward in perhaps some discretionary spend, things like that have been pulled back pretty tight over the course of the last 12 months. But I think the SG&A as a percentage of revenue you'll see probably trend closer to 2019 levels. But the technology product spend [ has been tacked ], and we continue to do layer on. We've also had, as we mentioned on prior calls, incremental public company costs, roughly $10 million or so, that you'll see wrapped up into that number. So that's what I'd expect from an OpEx standpoint. Moving forward it's probably more closely aligned with 2019 levels of spend relative to revenue.

Next question is from Anthony Chukumba of Loop Capital.

Congrats on a really strong start to 2021. So I guess my first question, I'm just sort of trying to reconcile this, because I know when you -- last year was sort of this perfect storm and everything that could have gone wrong from a GMV growth perspective kind of went wrong. And one thing you talked about was the fact that there's all this fiscal stimulus, and it seemed like that was a headwind, right? In other words, if I've got this check burning a hole in my pocket, maybe I don't need to do lease to own. I make my payment, but maybe I don't originate a new lease. But now it seems like you're saying that stimulus was a bit of a tailwind where you were doing sort of mid- to high single-digit GMV and then the stimulus hit, and then that got you to 10.4%. So I guess I'm just trying to reconcile those 2 things.

Yes, I think that's fair. I mean, it's not really different than what we experienced last year. And it was just -- it's more difficult to parse out because last year, the stimulus was like, right in the depths of the pandemic. But we saw a very similar trend. So you get this -- and for lack of a better term, we call it a sugar high when the checks hit, and you can see it through the -- we have hourly application trackers in our business intelligence tools. And you can see the apps just, the spike when the ACH has hit the account and our contact centers light up with calls. And that happened, so apps are leading indicators to GMV. And so you'd see kind of a spike in apps. For last year, it was maybe 2 weeks or 3 weeks. And then earlier this year, it was about 10 days. And then in March, it was maybe 7 days. So it seems to be muted each time. What we were talking about from a headwind standpoint from the back half of 2020 was less -- I mean, we talked about it as stimulus, but it was more about just increased liquidity that the consumer had from the shelter in place, for lack of a better term, because they didn't have as many things pulling on their disposable income. They weren't going to movies. They weren't going to ball games. They may not have been eating out as often, they weren't traveling. And so they -- and maybe they weren't paying their rent, we don't know. But from a liquidity standpoint, they were just a little bit more flush. The thing that I think is different this year, and it remains to be seen how it plays out, is stimulus in the face of a reopening economy and the pressures that our consumer would generally have on their income. So we -- built into our outlook is not additional stimulus. And we know there's continued enhanced unemployment that goes through, I think, August or September. And some other things. But that check that landed on top of a normal tax season, that was kind of like a sugar high. And then we expect the other headwinds that we had facing us in 2020 to dissipate, and the reopening and the in-store traffic and our decisioning and the things that we control, to overcome any lingering effects of less point-of-sale payment usage, to drive a nice GMV growth for us.

Got it. No, that's helpful clarification. So just sort of a related question. So as we think about the second quarter, I guess the next few quarters, if health conditions get back to normal and people aren't all cooped up in their home, and they're going out to movie theaters, and they're going out to restaurants and maybe they're going on vacation, that should help because they have less money to buy stuff and thus they're going to have to rely more on lease to own. And then obviously, if retail stores are open, and you're going to be anniversarying your biggest quarter of your retail partner stores being closed, that should help as well. I mean is that the right way to kind of think about it? I mean I know there's other moving parts. But is that the right way to think about just those 2 components?

Yes. I mean, I think you got it. Like we know -- we've talked for a couple of quarters that we're rooting for a return to normal because people -- they need the flexibility of the lease to own. They need a paid-for type product. They like the flexibility that it offers. And in a normal operating environment, point-of-sale payment options are a very flexible and convenient way for people to acquire goods. And we expect that will basically -- normal behavior will come back. And so that would be a tailwind for us. And then we've got the other things like the decisioning and other things that we have done and other initiatives like e-comm and things that we're leaning into, that I think would -- that will kind of overlay on top of that.

Okay. Got it. And at the risk of bogarting the earnings call, just one quick follow-up just because you sort of mentioned it, so it just kind of jumped into my head. Any sense for -- you mentioned that decisioning got back to sort of pre-pandemic approval rates, if I heard that correctly. Any sense for how much of a contributor of that was the GMV growth?

Yes. I mean, I don't think we're going to parse it that way, but we're comfortable -- while we were comfortable with the decision we made last year, we've made the appropriate adjustments to prudently help with growth this year. We're in a good spot right now. Our approval rates are a little bit higher. Approval amounts are higher too, which matters, and approval amount is maybe not as, but it's very important in the overall portfolio performance, and we've been able to increase approval amounts, which helps with average ticket, which helps our partners and us. We'll always look for other or more ways to say yes to people and say yes for more dollars to the right people. And we look -- that's a strategic advantage that our decision science teams brings to us. But as far as like what it contributed in Q1, we're not going to comment on that.

Fair enough. Keep up the good work, guys.

That concludes our Q&A portion. I'll now turn the call over to Steve Michaels for closing comments. Steve?

Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. We certainly appreciate your interest in PROG Holdings. Our team is super excited about our momentum and our opportunity to continue Progressive's impressive history of growth and innovation. I want to thank all of PROG Nation for their tireless efforts to innovate and simplify, which is one of our core values on behalf of our customers and retail partners, and we look forward to updating you next quarter.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.