Great question, David and very pertinent relative to our results and the commentary we made. This is Vik, I'll take that and Rakesh can supplement as applicable. Look, from an external perspective, in terms of the level of tax refunds that were provided by Treasury, they were, I think, relative to prior years, would be regarded as fairly normal, right, and nothing unusual in the volume of refunds that were given. Internally, with regard to our interactions with consumers, as we mentioned in our remarks, we are seeing a positive level of engagement with consumers. They are maintaining their -- establishing plans and maintaining their plans. And so we are not seeing at this point in time and a little bit through the first few weeks of the second quarter, nothing at this point in time that would suggest a falloff in consumer activity with us. That said, clearly, we had a mismatch between our expectations for cash collection in the quarter and the actual cash that came in, albeit, it was a very strong quarter with regard to the quarter-on-quarter increase as well as the year-on-year increase in cash. Clearly, we had a disconnect with regard to the expectations in our business and that just flowed through, right? So, we don't see this linked as a consumer-driven issue in our business or externally at this point in time. It really was around the modeling that we had for the seasonality, which was, I guess, in retrospect, higher than the actual trends. And Rakesh, I think we've taken a view on the causality of this and the implications, maybe you could just add to that, right?