Good morning, and welcome to Centennial Resource Development's Conference Call to discuss its Second Quarter 2020 Earnings. Today's call is being recorded. A replay of the call will be accessible until August 18, 2020, by dialing 855-859-2056 and entering the conference ID number 7031059 or by visiting Centennial's website at www.cdevinc.com. At this time, I will turn the call over to Hays Mabry, Centennial's Director of Investor Relations, for some opening remarks. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Rebecca. And thank you all for joining us on the company's second quarter earnings call. Presenting on the call today are Sean Smith, our Chief Executive Officer; George Glyphis, our Chief Financial Officer; and Matt Garrison, our Chief Operating Officer. Yesterday, August 3, we filed a Form 8-K with an earnings release reporting second quarter earnings results for the company and operational results for our subsidiary, Centennial Resource Production, LLC. We also posted an earnings presentation to our website that we will reference during today's call. You can find the presentation on our website homepage or under presentations at www.cdevinc.com. I would like to note that many of the comments during this earnings call are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could affect our actual results and plans. Many of these risks are beyond our control and are discussed in more detail in the Risk Factors and the forward-looking statements sections of our filings with the SEC, including our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020, which was also filed with the SEC yesterday. Although we believe the expectations expressed are based on reasonable assumptions, they are not guarantees of future performance. And actual results or developments may differ materially. We may also refer to non-GAAP financial measures that help facilitate comparisons across periods and with our peers. For any non-GAAP measure we use, a reconciliation to the nearest corresponding GAAP measure can be found in our earnings release or presentation, which are both available on our website. With that, I will turn the call over to Sean Smith, our CEO.

Thank you, Hays. The past six months have certainly been a challenging time for the entire E&P industry including Centennial. In March, we witnessed an unprecedented increase in global supply from OPEC plus members amid a global pandemic, which had already significantly weakened near-term demand. These events in part have caused oil prices to move significantly lower and cause widespread shut-ins by the industry during the second quarter. With this in mind, I'd like to start off today's call by quickly reviewing Centennial's response to recent global events that have transpired over the past several months, and is outlined on Slide 4 of today's presentation. We reacted decisively in order to protect the balance sheet and manage liquidity. In May, we announced plans to temporarily suspend all drilling and completion activity, while materially reducing our full year capital budget by 60%. As a result of low realized prices, we voluntarily curtailed approximately 20% of our May production in order to protect field level cash flow and economics. The production team used our in house data analytics tool to quickly evaluate well economics to determine which will should be shut-in based off actual net backs and operating costs for each a new individual well in the field over this time. In early June, and as oil prices increased we brought back essentially all of our shut-in volumes with virtually no incremental costs or associated work over expense. As discussed on the previous earnings call, we also took several steps in order to significantly reduce our cost structure and been outstanding. During the second quarter, we made the tough but necessary decision to reduce the size of our workforce in order to better align the company's organizational structure given the current commodity prices environment and subsequent activity levels. This also included reduction in salaries across all company employees, with the largest reductions being taken at the senior management and board levels. Additionally, we executed a successful debt exchange offer, which reduced our total debt outstanding by $127 million and lower future interest expense. It is important to note, we have not been standing idle during this lower commodity price environment. We've taken this opportunity to completely review our operational procedures and practices, searching for any incremental cost savings or efficiencies. While George and Matt will provide more details on this shortly, I am confident that Centennial will emerge from this downturn with expanded operating margins and structurally lower well costs, which will continue to benefit the company going forward. With that, I will turn the call over to George to review the financials before providing some closing remarks, George?

Thank you, Sean. I'll first review our Q2 financial results and then discuss the debt exchange, capital structure, liquidity hedge position and 2020 guidance. Turning to our financials on Slide 11 of the earnings presentation. Net oil production for the second quarter averaged approximately 37,400 barrels per day, which was down 13% over the prior year period and represents a 10% decrease from Q1. Production was impacted by the voluntary curtailment of approximately 20% of May volumes and the significant reduction in completion activity during Q2. Average net oil equivalent production totaled 68,245 barrels per day, which was down 10% from the prior year period and represents a 5% reduction from Q1. Total equivalent production declined less than oil production because we have less flush contributions from new wells, which typically yield a higher oil cut, and we flared fewer volumes in Q2 compared to Q1. Revenues totaled approximately $90 million, which was a 53% decrease compared to Q1 primarily as a result of the significant decline in oil and NGL price realizations and lower production. Excluding the impact of basis hedges Centennial's Q2 realizations were 77% of WTI or $21.47 per barrel compared to $45.14 in Q1. Lower oil realizations as a percentage of WTI, primarily driven by a negative CMA roll adjustment, particularly during the month of May. Lastly, NGL prices were down 46% to $7.72 per barrel compared to $14.30 in Q1. Turning to cost. Despite the decline in production volumes, unit costs continue to look good relative to our expectations. LOE per barrel decreased by 17% from Q1 to $4.16 primarily as a result of lower workover expense, as well as continued reduction in equipment rentals and electricity. Matt will provide further details on LOE shortly. Cash G&A for Q2 was $2.21 per barrel overall, that…

Thank you, George. During challenging times such as present. We have been more focused than ever on reducing what costs we can control across every single discipline in the company. As many of you know, from last quarter's call Centennial has implemented a number of projects in the field focus on reducing LOE costs. And I'm pleased to share with you the progress we've made, as well as detail the positive financial impacts that they've had. As you can see on Slide 5, we reduced second quarter LOE per unit by 17% compared to last quarter, representing our third consecutive quarter of declining LOE per unit. Even more impressive is the fact that we've been able to continue to reduce our LOE in a declining production environment. Looked at it a slightly different way, total LOE decreased $16.5 million from the third quarter of 2019. Even though, we added over 50 wells since that time. This considerable savings has been driven by the execution from our operations staff on a number of different fronts. Earlier this year, we completed Phase 1 of our company owned electric substation in Reeves County upon initial startup, we were immediately able to reduce the number of generators from approximately 135 to 50 as seen on Slide 6. The savings on rentals from this is obvious, but the more reliable and consistent form of power manifests itself in significant reductions in downtime, which directly impacts the bottom line. Additionally, we expect Phases II and III of our electric substation to be operational during the fourth quarter of this year, further reducing our reliance on generators and having a direct impact on our go forward LOE cost. Staying on Slide 6, you can see our transition to gas lift has been a very significant effort by…

Thanks, Matt. Having made some significant cost improvements in the business over the past several months, I trust you can understand why we're excited to resume activity during the second half of the year. This is an important first step in order to moderate current declines and provide momentum heading into 2021. I'm confident that we'll be able to carry forward the cost reductions you've heard highlighted on today's call. Therefore, it is key to understand that our future growth as a company will be supported by one expanded margins, specifically pertaining to future LOE and G&A costs. And two, materially lower well cost. Finally, one positive outcome which has resulted from our reduction and activity is the significant swallowing of our corporate decline rate. As I mentioned during last quarter's call, our corporate oil decline rate was 45% to 50% at the end of March. Including our planned activity during the second half of this year, we expect this metric to improve to the low 30% range by the end of this year. This represents a significant reduction and will have multiple benefits. The resetting of our corporate decline rate will provide a shower-based production wedge for us to restart activity, helping us eventually returned to modest production growth in the future. Before we go to Q&A, I'd like to leave you with five key takeaways from this morning's call. One, we've significantly lowered our D&C costs, thus driving capital efficiency. And there's still more room for improvement as Matt mentioned. Two, we've enhanced our margins as a result of recent cost initiatives and optimization of our asset base, particularly to LOE and G&A. Three, our corporate decline rates will be materially lower than previous years providing us with solid footing headed into 2021. Four, we've reduced the total principal amount of debt outstanding and lowered future interest expense, as a result of the debt exchange. And five. Finally, we expect to essentially the cash flow neutral for the remainder of this year, helping us to manage liquidity while resuming activity. In closing, all the above will provide a solid base for Centennial underpinned by a materially lower cost structure. And let's not lose sight of the fact that we have very high quality assets and an outstanding technical team to sustain and drive the future value of the company. With these tailwinds in our back, we're excited to return to the modest level of activity as we close out 2020 and head into 2021. Thanks for listening and now head to Q&A.

Thank you. The question-and-answer session will be conducted electronically. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Scott Hanold with RBC Capital Markets.

Thank you. I guess my first question would be, what is the plan going forward? I mean, obviously you guys had taken off all activity when prices got low and are starting to resume now. But, as you look forward what strategically, do you want to do? Is the goal to reduce gross debt to reduce leverage niche matrix or metrics to a certain points, to maintain production? If you can give us some line of sight on how you think about that? And, when you do start activity on more consistent basis going forward, is it going to be more weighed to the New Mexico area or to Texas?

Sure, Scott. I appreciate the question there. And I certainly understand the desire for everybody to get a look at 2021. As we all know that the back half of this year is going to be a lot of changes. And a lot can happen between now and when we start talking about our full guidance for next year. With elections coming up, we've got the vaccines relative to the pandemic, we'll see how that affects are, the global economy and then ultimately supply demand dynamics. And so all of that weighs into how we're looking at it next year. And we have never given forward-looking guidance this early in the prior year. So that's not something we're going to do today. But from a managing of the company perspective, take into account that we've totally reset the company from our corporate decline rate, or a cost structure or balance sheet and we really positioned ourselves to respond to however, commodity prices look going into next year, I think we've done a very good job of that. And the fact that we're cash flow neutral, the back half of the year really just shows kind of how we've restructured the business. So while we don't give forward looking guidance, I think what can be said is that, we are going to balance both the capital spend returning to some level of activity, while at the same time managing our leverage profile. So it'll be a combination of the two as how we are managing our business going forward. I know that's not the maintenance CapEx at the number that people are looking for. But that's how we are going to manage our business for the back half a year and how we look at going into 2021.

I understand the challenges instead. I appreciate that color. And my follow-up.

Let me just address that before you even ask one more follow up is. Texas, Mexico I think that, George mentioned that maybe the rig is going to start off in Texas and then move into Mexico. That is the plan, we've got. It just, we've got some very attractive lease in there that we'd like to get to in Texas that can be very favorably with our returns in New Mexico. So we're going to go hit a two well pad there, assuming we have a rig stand up in the fourth quarter. And then that rig will immediately move to New Mexico, where it will be in development mode on or New Mexico assets. So that's kind of our plan of activity and how we plan attacking it at the end of this year going into first part next.

And then my follow-up question is obviously, the big transaction Chevron on noble. You could have implications on your acreage and nobles very intermix with your acreage profile. Could you remind us how -- between yourselves in noble how much of that acreage is from a development strategy is somewhat continuous? Or are you planning just to kind of go your separate ways? Or is there some push and pulls with Chevron now going to be taking control of that land?

I would say, there is not going to be any material pushing and pulls with noble and Chevron going forward. We operate the majority, I mean nearly all of our position and so we control our own destiny and we'll get pulled into any material non-opposition with the new operator down there. I think we're in a very favorable position. They are more adjacent to us and intermixed with us. So look forward to seeing what kind of development plan that Chevron has in order for that area, but don't think that it will impact any of our operations.

Your next question comes from the line of Neal Dingmann, Wunderlich Securities.

[Indiscernible]. I know you mentioned two well pad. And now my next question, sort of [Indiscernible] sort of two wells or three wells pads. And so can you give the cost versus out of -- these smaller pads

You were breaking up during that question. But I think I got it all. You really talking about pad size and cost capital efficiency associated with our average pad size. And can we continue that going forward I think what you're getting to. So that's what I'm going to answer now. If that doesn't sound right, we can try it again.

That's it. That's it.

Going forward, we do plan on two, three and four well pad sizes. I think that's consistent with what we've done in the past. I think the efficiencies that we've seen in Q1 and even into late last year will continue those efficiencies plus the continued improvement as Matt had mentioned. So I don't think we'll have anything lost from by going from five-rigs to now ramping back to one rigs. And then eventually, as more as we go into the future. Maybe Matt, I'll turn -- I'll let our COO to address anything that I may have missed there. But go ahead, Matt.

I think fundamentally, what Sean said is correct with regard to our desire to drill more wells on a pad kind of our start sweet spot is somewhere around three wells per pad maybe a fourth well. But just by the way, we operate typically we target two and three well, pads kind of on average. That being said, anytime you're standing up a rig and starting over, there's going to be just some level of efficiency from when you were running multiple rigs for months and months on end, you're going to lose a little bit of some of those efficiencies as you just start to pick up activity again. So I wouldn't expect right off the pad that we hit our stride on the very first well out the gate, I think it's going to take some familiarity with the people in the field and some communication and oversight from our guys in the office. And then I think, we'll hit our stride pretty quickly because we do have lofty expectations for efficiencies on a go forward basis.

Okay. [Indiscernible]. On the hedges [Indiscernible] situation. And earlier this year that those second third quarter hedge I thought, I guess your thoughts into '21 you'll be in a much better position, both cash and operations wise. So, again, would it just be more opportunistically as hedges? Or as well you're trying to think about it.

Yes, I think Neal, the way we're thinking about the hedges, I said in my remarks is we think about it in terms of covering a big chunk of our corporate costs, whether they be G&A or interest. And we're going to do that primarily through swaps and to some extent cost of those collars. And in addition to that, in a more normalized kind of operating environment part of the philosophy is, as you put some hedges in place to protect your cash flow so that you can support your capital program, your overall activity levels, you are whipsawing the number of rigs you have out and the number of completion crews. The other thing to think about is how those hedges might impact your borrowing base. And so, there is a thought to making sure that we're kind of optimizing and enhancing our borrowing base levels going forward. We also want to recognize that, we're in the depths of the world here with the global economy and argue is over time, as the economy improves, oil prices will go up. So we do want to give our investors some upside exposure as well. So there's a bit of a balance there. But I'd say as well as the strategy is evolving, it's obviously something that's new to the company. And I think you can differentiate between what we did in Q2 and Q3 versus what we've done in Q4, what we plan to do going forward. So we don't have specific targets, timing that we put in place for -- we're going to hedge X percent of volumes. But that's something that we're working on internally and our thoughts on as we go. But bottom-line is we will be much more active from a hedging standpoint and mitigate the risks associated with the oil price environment.

Your next question comes from the line of Leo Mariani from KeyBanc.

Just wanted to kind of get a little bit more color on actually restart here. You certainly go into the one rig case just kind of wanted to get a sense is that a level of activity you feel pretty comfortable at? It's sort of $40, you guys have mentioned, potentially adding some other rigs into the future. Is it really just kind of governed by cash flow? Is the plan going forward just to do your best to kind of spend within cash flows? Just trying to kind of get a sense of what the governor's are future activity changes to see though?

Sure, thanks Leo for the question. And yes I do feel comfortable that we will be adding likely adding a rig in the fourth quarter, obviously, depending on what commodity prices are doing, I think it's still a volatile market. It has sales a bit, as we've all seen, it seems like $40 is a bit of a floor at least recently. And that's a good sign that there is support for that price and above. I think what as we mentioned in the prepared remarks, assuming strip price, which is essentially $40 slightly increasing in the outward years. That supports at least a modest level of activity. So should prices change one way or the other dramatically? We may pivot from that, but I feel very comfortable that's what we're going to see towards the back half of the year. We haven't given what a rig case would look like for next year. But assuming prices continue to improve and we think overtime, they will, as those prices continue to see upward momentum and support looked for us to add additional activity. That being said, that we'll all be balanced with our leverage being forefront in our mind. We want to position the company such that we don't get too far out over our SKUs from a leverage perspective. And so balancing between the two will be what we are doing going forward.

I guess, just following up on the leverage. Obviously, you guys had a successful data exchange here recently. Just trying to get clearances. There's other future initiatives at the company to reduce debt. You're talking about spending it in cash flow in the second half of the year, obviously, that kind of your more maintains debt. There are other things that you guys might be looking at whether it's future debt exchange? Or other initiatives to potentially kind of reduce bad debt over the next couple years?

We'll always be looking for opportunity to lower our leverage profile. If there are options to do so that are accreted to our metrics. You recall, we were looking at an SVD sale earlier in the year and which would have materially changed our balance sheet. That did not go through, as we all know. But the benefits of that is that we keeping that asset helped push our LOE costs further down. So there are good things to that. So we are always are looking at strategic sales of non-core assets. And we'll continue to do that. If we're able to put a package together again of non-core assets that we think we can get fair value for that will be accretive to our metrics that will help de-lever the company, then we'll consider that going forward.

Your next question comes from the line of Will Thompson from Barclays.

I appreciate the detailed look under the hood and all the cost initiatives. It clearly seems like you there's more structural nature. But I want to ask one of the slides indicates that Centennial is in active negotiation with service providers. Can you just give us a little sense on how those conversations are going and whether price concessions would be outside for 2021 cost impact versus what you're kind of taking in the second half of '20?

Sure. Yes. This is Matt. I'll go ahead and start trying to feel that question. We provided on Slide 7, a bit of a historical look at our performance back to 2018 really from the spud, it's a rig release as well as our completion stages per day really kind of deliberately to show a bit of a track record of really more of the structural efficiency gains with regard to our overall costs. And if you think about this company's activity, the majority of our activity was in fact, almost all of our activity was in Q1. And it stopped abruptly in Q2, as George alluded to in his portion of the script. And so with the exception of some minor spillover with regard to a few completions that were done in the first couple of weeks in Q2 to dominantly, the costs that were reflected on that Slide 7 were indicative of more structural changes. The negotiations with service company providers obviously without tipping too much, we feel very good about there being some additional upside potential there to realize some cost savings on top of that. We of course, consider those kinds of things in a go forward look at our business. But for the purposes of planning and for the purposes of kind of just sticking to the fundamentals of blocking and tackling we really like to focus on the things that we can control and the things that we can change with our teams. Is that help you?

That does. Thank you, Matt. And then I guess my follow-up just to clarify on the base decline. The improvement from to low 30s. Is that on a BOE basis? And if it is, I mean how much Delta would it be for oil? And then maybe to manage expectations and context before your production guidance. Is it fair to assume 4Q will be below 3Q levels? Just want to understand sort of the cadence and why the fact that's being completed this quarter.

Yes, I appreciate the question, Will. And thank you for acknowledging that we've given us some increased level of detail. And that's intentional, we're trying to be more helpful for folks to get a better look at the company and how we operate structurally going forward. Relative to the corporate decline, those numbers are quoted we're on BOE basis and so feel good about that is the controlling entity, I guess, if you will, or commodity for the company. And so that's how we kind of think about things. We don't give quarterly guidance and so that's not something I think, I'm going to weigh in on. I think, if you draw a line from where we stand today to our midpoint of our guidance, it'll give you a good feel for how we're thinking of things. So I think that's the level of detail we can kind of provide from a quarterly basis.

Our next question comes from the line of Duncan McIntosh with Johnson Rice.

Quick question, kind of are on the OpEx side. You guys have mentioned pretty impressive improvements. And like you said, despite volumes kind of coming down. That being said, it does look like based on the full year guidance LOE comes up a little bit in the back half of the year. Kind of what's the driver there? And then to kind of get the midpoint looks like levels are around kind of five bucks is that kind of a good number to think about on going forward as well?

Sure, I'll touch on that and if I'm missing anything Matt can jump in. I think, if you look at the back half the year. Obviously our activity level has slowed. And so our production will then also continue to decline a little bit. We've added a little bit of activity and the fact that we've got some ducks that we are currently completing, and we plan on starting up a rig in the fourth quarter. But that's not going to be fully enough activity to offset the decline. So from a unit cost perspective, you may have some increase in LOE but from a total dollar number, we're still working on decreases.

At this time, we have no further questions. This does conclude today's conference call. You may disconnect at this time.