Good morning, and welcome to Centennial Resource Development's Conference Call to discuss its First Quarter 2018 Earnings. Today's call is being recorded. A replay of the call will be accessible until May 23, 2018, by dialing 855-859-2056 and entering the conference ID number 1872225 or by visiting Centennial's website at www.cdevinc.com. At this time, I will turn the call over to Hays Mabry, Centennial's Director of Investor Relations for some opening remarks. Please go ahead.

Thanks Ashley, and thank you all for joining us on the company's first quarter 2018 earnings call. Presenting on the call today are Mark Papa, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; George Glyphis, our Chief Financial Officer; and Sean Smith, our Chief Operating Officer. Yesterday May 8th, we filed a Form 8-K with an earnings release reporting first quarter earnings results for the company and operational results for our subsidiary, Centennial Resource Production, LLC. We also posted an earnings presentation to our website that we will reference during today's call. You can find the presentation on our website homepage or under Presentations at www.cdevinc.com. I would like to note that many of the comments during this earnings call are forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties that could affect our actual results and plans. Many of these risks are beyond our control and are discussed in more detail in the Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statement sections of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Although we believe the expectations expressed are based on reasonable assumptions, they are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially. We may also refer to non-GAAP financial measures that help facilitate comparisons across periods and with our peers. For any non-GAAP measures we use, a reconciliation to the nearest corresponding GAAP measure can be found in our earnings release available on our website. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Mark Papa, Chairman and CEO.

Thanks Hays. Good morning and welcome to Centennial's first quarter 2018 earnings call. Our presentation sequence on this call will be as follows; George will first discuss our quarterly financial results, updated hedge positions and liquidity. Sean will then provide an operational update of the quarter as well as give an overview of our current midstream arrangements and then I will follow with my views regarding the oil macro, our strategy as a function of the macro and closing comments. Now I will ask George to review our financial results.

Thank you, Mark. During the first quarter we averaged seven operated rigs and completed 16 wells as you can reference on Page 5 of the earnings presentation. Oil production for Q1 increased 15% from Q4 and averaged approximately 31,575 barrels per day. Average equivalent production was up 22% and totals approximately 54,070 barrels equivalent per day. Oil volumes as a percentage of total equivalent production were 58% which is right in line with our expectations. During the first half of the year, we expect our oil mix to range from 58% to 59% and increase to 60% to 61% for the second half of the year. Revenues for the first quarter totaled approximately $216 million, which was up 30% from the prior quarter because of higher sales volumes and a higher average realized oil price. The company's realized oil price before basis hedges increased sequentially by 17%, reaching $61.53 per barrel during the first quarter, compared to $52.45 in Q4. This represents a 98% realization versus the average NYMEX price for the quarter. While oil differentials are now a key point of focus for the sector, Q1 benefited from a benign Mid-Cush differential of positive $0.34 per barrel. Turning to costs unit costs for the quarter came in better than expected. We experienced unit cost decrease from the prior quarter for lease operating expenses, gathering and processing and transportation, cash G&A and DD&A. Given that all of these unit costs were below the low-end of our full-year guidance we expect to see some modest degree of escalation during the balance of the year and are not changing any of our full year of unit cost estimates at this time. Adjusted EBITDAX totaled approximately $162 million which was up 34% increase compared to $120 million in Q4. This was driven primarily…

Thank you, George. During the first quarter, Centennial continued to make strides in evaluating and developing our acreage position. We brought online our first well in the Wolfcamp A in the Northern Delaware, as well as a strong Wolfcamp B well and two exceptional Wolfcamp A wells in the Southern Delaware. During the quarter, we spud 19 wells and completed 16 wells and are on track for our full year completion guidance of 75 to 85 gross operated wells. The wells completed this quarter outperformed our internal estimates and delivered an average IP30 of 1,200 barrels of oil per day per well. These results combined with our lower unit costs drove our strong financial performance during the quarter. Turning to our well results on Slide 6, we recently completed the Juliet 1H targeting the Wolfcamp A. We are excited about the Juliet well, which represents our first Wolfcamp test in Lea County in New Mexico. The well was drilled with an approximate 4,000 foot lateral and had an IP30 of 1,450 barrels of oil equivalent per day, the 78% oil or 1,100 barrels of oil per day. On a per lateral foot basis, the Juliet reported an impressive 280 barrels of oil per day per 1,000 foot of lateral. These results are very encouraging as we believe the Wolfcamp will be to developed across a significant portion of our Lea County position. Since adding a rig to these assets in September of last year, we completed wells in multiple intervals, consisting of the Avalon, second Bone Spring and Wolfcamp reservoirs. And all of these tests have either met or exceeded our expectations. This is a testament to our team and their knowledge of the acreage and we expect to delineate zones throughout the year. During the first quarter Centennial also…

Thanks Sean. Now I will provide some thoughts relating to the oil macro picture and relate them to Centennial's strategy. I will also provide comments regarding how we see this position for the rest of year and for the next several years. The oil macro posture is developing as expected and prices have reacted in a manner consistent with my commentary on previous earnings calls. I continue to believe that the overall US supply response in 2018 and later years will be less than currently predicted by the EIA, IEA and OPEC, resulting in more severe supply demand tightening than currently forecasted by these agencies. CDEV's response is to continue to remain unhedged regarding oil. We will employ some tactical oil basis hedges from time to time, but it's unlikely we will hedge WTI anytime soon. Given our macro view, we see no need to change our industry-leading targeted growth trajectory towards 65,000 barrels of oil a day in 2020. As noted by our previous speakers CDEV is currently firing on all cylinders. During the first quarterly we hit or surpassed all of our production and cost targets. The driver of these results is our well quality. We continue to make excellent wells and I believe we are the second best in the entire industry in shale oil exploitation, and that's not too bad for a one and half-year-old company. Additionally, the 60 day production performance of our initial third Bone Spring Sand well indicates this zone will provide a meaningful high ROR inventory addition, essentially for free because it's on existing acreage. That's a much more efficient way of adding inventory than doing an expensive M&A. Another key accomplishment this quarter has been excellent progress in locking up firm transportation commitments for our casing head gas both to and…

[Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from Scott Hanold with RBC Capital Markets.

Mark always appreciate your macro thoughts and certainly playing out beneficial to see there's lack of hedges I guess at this point on NYMEX. When you step back and look at where we are on [prior] month and the forward curve, what is your view of like what the forward prices will eventually play out and is there a point where you do feel more comfortable to go out there and secure some stronger prices?

Yes just a overview Scott, as you the IEA and EIA are forecasting total US oil growth this year of the range of 1.3 million to 1.4 million barrels a day. My forecast is about 0.95 and my forecast for 2019 is lower than that. And I think that with that in 2018, 2019 will see a further constriction in global supply and demand even if you exclude the Iranian sanctions situation. So even at the current $70 WTI price level I see a strong possibility of further strengthening in WTI over the next couple of years. So we would intend to remain unhedged. Yes there is certainly a price when we would lay on some WTI hedges, but at this point I wouldn't divulge what that price it would be a fluid situation. But I can tell you that price is not $70. And as far as the futures curve with the severe backwardation I would say it's laughable that would be my term for it, it's ridiculous. So that's kind of my view on macro and then CDEV's strategy is simply, we would intend to be one of the fastest oil growth entities in the US in what we believe will be a very strong WTI pricing environment over the next multiple years. And the last comment I would make to you is one of the group think items there is out there is short cycle times. The concept is you have strong oil prices that turns on the shale machine and the shale machine generates a vast amount of oil, which pushes all prices down, i.e., short cycle times and I believe that that group think is 100% wrong, and the concept of short cycle times is incorrect because even if capital gets poured into the shale machine, the shale machine will disappoint in terms of aggregate oil production growth. So I think the industry and the world is going to have to conclude that the short cycle time group think is an incorrect way of looking at global supply and demand over the next multiple years.

That's great. Appreciate that color. And as my follow-up question I think George you had mentioned you do expect oil cuts to move up into the 60%, 61% range in the back half of the year. Can you talk about how some of those Southern Delaware -- when those rigs start shifting and the zone that you will be targeting to kind push that shift little bit -- higher oil.

Just briefly, we would intend to run pretty much one rig in the Northern Delaware, in Lea County throughout the year. That's a higher oil cut, that's about an 80% oil cut. So that will be relatively constant. The subtle shift between 58% to 62% is really just how many rigs we run on our Silverback acreage, if you will, and at what point in time do we run those rigs there. The Silverback acreage is slightly gassier than the rest of our Reeves County acreage. And so what you see there is that as we have the well scheduled, the fact that our mix will change a little bit there throughout the year is just a function of how many wells we have slotted and when they are slotted to go on to the Silverback acreage.

And those oil cuts in Silverback and legacy Centennial acreage down there all produce about the same oil cuts -- same oils barrels is that right?

Yeah, except the Silverback acreage in Reeves County has got a little higher gas oil ratio that's what swings it a little bit between this 58% to 62% throughout the year.

Your next question comes from Leo Mariani with NatAlliance Securities.

Guys wanted to dig in a little bit into that oil dips here, obviously they have expanded quite rapidly over the last month or so. Do you guys have any expectations as to sort of where those dips may settle out if you work your way into the second half of 2018? And I guess additionally is there a some level of oil dip or if it really were to blow out in a much, much more meaningful fashion that you guys would consider slowing down a little?

We don't think those oil dips are going to reach the point where it would change our drilling program Leo if that's the direction of your question. We think that if oil dips did get wide enough it would kind activate more rail out of the basin which there hasn't a lot of rail out of the Permian basin here just in the last couple months. So that's, the safety valve if you will on there. And of course, we believe that by the second half of '19 those differentials will shrink again that's pretty much indicated by the futures market for the differential just as you get additional pipeline capacity. So we think it is a transitory item that's probably nine months in duration at the most. But we can't really give you an idea of if differentials are going to stay at $10 to $12 or is it going to shrink back to $7. We don't have enough intrinsic knowledge to give you a good estimate of what it might be for the second half of the year and we can't pretend to understand how much is the downtime on the border refinery and some of those things. How big of a factor is that in this whole differential thing. Our guess is there is a fair amount of emotion in this differential right now, which makes it even harder to forecast for the second half of the year, Leo. So sorry, we can't give you a lot of specificity on it.

Those were very good thoughts for sure and helpful to everyone. Just looking at your start to the year in the first quarter obviously very strong production here. Just wanted to kind of get your thoughts there, was this largely driven by better-than-expected well performance as you guys see it? Wanted to get your opinion on that. It only looks to me is that based on that the strong start and do you guys plan on continuing [indiscernible] operations side, production guidance looks more towards the upper half on your numbers here?

We're not going to fall into trap of telling you to raise your guidance. What we recommend you use the midpoint of guidance on there. What you can conclude from the first quarter is, we kind of hit the high-end of the production range with less completions than we expected and the reason was the average well for the first quarter ended up being stronger than we expected. And the good news out of all that was that the well results for the first quarter were remarkably consistent. If I showed you a graph of all the completions in the first quarter, it was a pretty tight performance graph in that you didn't have a wide spread of the results. So we're seeing very consistent results and frankly they are consistent above our type curve expectations and that's what we've really have been striving for is a set of consistent results. So right now we are just making consistently good wells and that's why I made that comment in my prepared talk that I truly believe that for a square -- if you gave CDEV a square mile of oil shale acreage that we will extract more oil out of it. We're second best in the industry right now and I believe the first best company is my former company. But we're second best out of all the companies in the industry of shale oil extraction. We've come that far in our technology improvement and that's showing up in our well quality.

Your next question comes from Irene Haas with Imperial Capital.

My question has to do with your Lea County, Wolfcamp A well that certainly is a very strong well and just wondering how far does this trend extend northward in Lea County? And then secondarily how much have you counted the Wolfcamp A within your inventory?

Sean do you want to take that?

Sure. Hi Irene. We're certainly excited about the well results there in Lea County that's our first Wolfcamp A well to test up in that area and it certainly is higher than what we expect to going in which is fantastic. I think it certainly does add some inventories, we only counted maybe a small portion of our position when we made the acquisition in Lea Country to be paid for during the acquisition and I think with this well result it expands the possibilities of Wolfcamp going over a large portion of our position into Mexico.

And if I may one more question, how does the Wolfcamp behave as you move from Reeves County northward, does it change in character? Is it better, worser, just some general color?

The main difference there is that as you go to the North, you have what's called the Wolfcamp XY which is a classic section that sits on top of the Wolfcamp shale. That is not present in the Southern Delaware. So, you may have some extra footage, aka, other targets there to target in the upper Wolfcamp that you might not have in the Southern Delaware. So that's the main difference. I'm very pleased with the results in both areas from the Wolfcamp A and that continues to be a highlight for our portfolio.

[Operator Instructions] And your next question come from Park Carrere with Scotia Howard Weil.

First question on takeaway, fully knowing that you're all still in negotiations. Is it possible to get some additional detail maybe on the in service date, the direction of the flow? And then on the oil side is there a contract with these marketers in are you getting Midland or some other oil price for that?

Sean do you want to take that?

Sure. We do price off Midland for the majority of our crude and as we said in the call just to address that in a couple of different ways. From a crude perspective, we have got ample capacity in the Oryx system to get us to Crane or Midland and that's where we ship all of our crude is to one or both of those destinations. And you all know, those are very liquid markets. That being said we do price off Midland for the majority of our crude from the wellhead. So we're exposed to the Mid-Cush differential if that's what you are going after. We don't price anything right now off of other indexes. And then I think from, if you're on the gas route we have got again firm transportation from the plant to WAHA and it's for a 100% of our volumes in 2018. And so we can get all of our gas to a very -- again very liquid market and then at that point, we are again subject to the WAHA differential. But as we said that's not a huge revenue driver for us, so less worried about that. But we can get all of our product both oil and gas to a market of which we can have very liquid sales.

Okay. Great thanks. And maybe a follow up on the Wolfcamp A, knowing its very early but that was a great result. Is there maybe some opportunity to transition a rig full-time to that later in the year or next year if it holds up?

I think as Mark stated a minute ago, right now we do not plan on changing our current plans for capital expenditures from north to south. We currently have a rig in the Northern Delaware running and that will test all the various formations that we have talked about. We have already got wells in the Avalon, the second Bone and now the Wolfcamp. I would look for us next year to expand on that and maybe redeploy a second rig in New Mexico at that point.

And the just one final if I could. The lateral length made a big jump sequentially, is that something we should be holding flat from here? I know you are planning on increase on lateral length year-over-year but just how should we look at that in the 2Q and beyond?

I think for the quarter we averaged 7,700 feet. Our model has averaging 7,500 feet for the remainder of the year.

Your next question comes from Matt Sorenson with Seaport Global.

I was hoping if you could expand a little on your Lea County midstream infrastructure and what the oil takeaway out of Lea County currently looks like?

Right now we have got a contract in place for the gas where it's an area dedication, so we are committed there similar to our Reeves County position. We're fully dedicated there to accommodate to move our gas out of the basin through WAHA. So we feel very comfortable on the gas position. On the oil side, we're in the final negotiations with a service provider and so we will be able to talk about that next quarter. But, they are crossing the t's and dotting the i's situation on that contract.

Okay thanks. And then as it pertains to your 2020 target of 65,000 barrels a day. If you continue to see out performance from your wells as you did in Q1, how do you think about that target? Would you look to maintain the current level of activity planned for now through 2020, in which case that 65,000 barrels a day would move higher or would you look to potentially reduce activity in and still achieve that target, in which case maybe that free flow could start coming a little earlier?

Yeah, I think the 65,000 barrel a day target is -- at this point we don't have any plans to adjust that number, even if our well out performance would indicate that we could maybe meet that 65 and move it to 70 or something. At this juncture, we are not looking to raise that number. So if we continue to make wells that turn out to be better than our type curve what I would expect we would do is that might allow us to get free cash flow numbers earlier and help with the financial side of things as opposed to saying we would likely raise the volume growth target. You might recall we just recently raised that volume growth target from 60 to 65, so that's a pretty fresh number.

Your next question comes from Dan McSpirit with BMO Capital Markets.

As early this time last year and maybe earlier than that you spoke to midstream takeaway as the biggest risk to growth stating maybe more general to the industry than about the company. It sounds like your concerns have not only not lessened than maybe increased. Is that a fair observation and how bad is it going to get for the industry that is, is the worst case scenario reflected in your own 7 million barrels a day US oil growth forecast?

Dan, our concern, even a year ago was really on gas takeaway from the Delaware basin and we still are very concerned on gas takeaway in the Delaware basin for the period 2019 and 2020. And part of that has really been particularly with Apache's development of Alpine High which is certainly put a lot of gas towards the WAHA hub. So I view that as a fairly high probability that in 2019 and 2020, there could be a pretty tense situation with gas exiting the WAHA hub, from particularly the Southern Delaware basin and that's why we have a very priority on securing FT both to WAHA and away from WAHA. And you heard Sean discuss that at length here just a little while ago. But that is not really play much of a part in my view of the fact that the shales in aggregate are going to disappoint relative to the IEA and EIA estimates. My view is again that both Eagle Ford and the Bakken are a bit long in the tooth and that this parent child issues in the Permian are going to limit production. And then the last point is that pressure from institutional investors to put value over volumes is also going to play a part and I think all of those items are just going to ensure that the total US oil production is going to be a bit less than what people are currently predicting. And in the case where global demand is galloping along at 1.6 million to 1.7 million barrels a day per year, I think that's just going to put further pressure on the global crude market and we're seeing that manifestation occurring as we speak. So that's just my overview Dan of kind of the bigger picture. It is not really related to short-term takeaway positions and the constraints in the Permian for say.

Understand and appreciate your response particularly the point about value over volumes and that's a good set up for my follow-up question. What resonates most with me from your prepared remarks is the statement about not aspiring to be the biggest but the best. That said how do you manage the inventory to drive better returns at the corporate level either adding or subtracting to it? And how do differentials play into planning location, thinking that maybe some acreage may be allowed to expire or traded as it may not compete for capital?

I'm a big believer even though with my previous company, we became the largest shale producer in the US. I'm a big believer that M&A is not the way to create the best equity performance and we never did that at my previous company. We're not a big M&A company and I'm not a big believer at CDEV and the best example I can give you here is this third Bone Spring Sand. I believe that once we get a few more well results to go with our first well result, which is an excellent well result it's going to show that we've added a significant amount of high [IRR] inventory essentially for free. And we could have done the other route, we could have done an expensive M&A and then issued a press release and said wow we've added a bunch of inventory in the Permian at $30,000 or $40,000 an acre. Instead, we will have added a bunch of inventory in the Permian for free and that I think you build through value in an E&P company. And so I think we just have a textbook example here with this third Bone Spring Sand of how you really build a value in a E&P company. So hopefully that give you a little bit. We will do some tactical additions like the OneEnergy deal we announced last quarter in the Northern Delaware. But don't look for us to make a monster M&A to proclaim that we're twice as big in the Delaware as we were last week. That's not the kind of growth that I'm looking to do with CDEV.

There are no further questions. I will now hand the call back over to Mark Papa for closing remarks.

Okay. I have no further closing remarks and we will talk to everybody next quarter. Thank you.

That concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.