Good afternoon and welcome to the PennantPark Investment Corporation's First Fiscal Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time all participants have been placed in a listen-only mode. The call will be open for question-and-answer session following speakers' remarks. [Operator Instructions]. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Mr. Art Penn, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PennantPark Investment Corporation. Mr. Penn, you may begin your conference.

Good afternoon, everyone. I'd like to welcome you to PennantPark Investment Corporation's first fiscal quarter 2023 earnings conference call. I'm joined today by Rick Allorto, our Chief Financial Officer. Rick, please start off by disclosing some general conference call information and include a discussion about forward-looking statements.

Thank you, Art. I'd like to remind everyone that today's call is being recorded. Please note that this call is the property of PennantPark Investment Corporation and that any unauthorized broadcast of this call in any form is strictly prohibited. An audio replay of the call will be available on our website. I'd also like to call your attention to the customary Safe Harbor disclosure in our press release regarding forward-looking information. Today's conference call may also include forward-looking statements and projections. And we ask that you refer to our most recent filings with the SEC for important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these projections. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements unless required by law. To obtain copies of our latest SEC filings, please visit our website at PennantPark Investment Corporation or call us at 212-905-1000. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Art Penn.

Thanks, Rick. We're going to spend a few minutes and comment on our target market environment, provide a summary of how we fared in the quarter ended December 31. How the portfolio's position for the upcoming quarters, our capital structure and liquidity, a detailed review of the financials, then open it up for Q&A. The results were mixed for the quarter ended December 31. However, PNNT is now well positioned to be a more stable, higher earning and higher dividend paying BDC. We saw significant reduction of NAV, primarily due to fair value adjustments to RAM Energy and the publicly traded stock of Cano. Additionally, our NII was reduced by $0.02 per share, due to an increased accrual for excise taxes resulting from overearning our dividend in prior time periods. We're closing the chapter on our legacy investment in RAM Energy and moving forward with the investment strategy that has served us well over the last seven years, including during the COVID time period. Our debt portfolio is performing well and is positioned to withstand volatility in the current economic environment. Our income has been growing, and we are significantly raising our dividend in line with the new earnings power of the company. The debt portfolio continues to benefit from rising base rates. As of December 31, our weighted average yield to maturity was 11.9%, which is up from 10.8% last quarter, and 8.8% last year, our PSLF JV continues to generate an attractive double digit ROE for PNNT. We are targeting a $1 billion vehicle overtime, which can drive additional growth and NII at PNNT. As a result of a stable debt portfolio, and the growing and investment income, the board of directors has approved another increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.185 per share. This is a 12.1%…

Thank you, Art. For the quarter ended December 31, net investment income totaled $0.16 per share, including $0.01 per share of other income. Operating expenses for the quarter were as follows. Interest and credit facility expenses were $9.7 million, base management and incentive fees were $6.8 million, general and administrative expenses were $1.1 million and provision for excise taxes was $2 million. The provision for excise tax of $2 million included an additional accrual of $1.55 million. We estimate that the quarterly run-rate provision for excise taxes will be $450,000. NII would have been $0.18 per share, if adjusted to exclude the additional accrual. As of December 31, we had two non-accruals, which represent 2.7% of the portfolio at cost and 1.1% at market value. For the quarter ended December 31, net realized and unrealized change on investments and debt, including provision for taxes was a loss of $82.2 million or $1.26 per share. The change in the fair value of our credit facility increased our GAAP NAV by $0.11 per share. As of December 31, our NAV per share was $7.71, which is down 14.1% from $8.98 per share from the prior quarter. Our GAAP debt-to-equity ratio was 1.3 times. As of December 31, our key portfolio statistics were as follows. The portfolio remains highly diversified with 125 companies across 32 different industries. The portfolio was invested in 55% first-lien secured debt, 11% in second-lien secured debt, 5% in subordinated debt excluding PSLF, 17% in preferred and common equity, excluding PSLF and 12% in PSLF. The weighted average yield on debt instruments was 11.9%. 96% of the debt portfolio is floating rate with an average LIBOR floor of 1%. Now let me turn the call back to Art.

Thanks, Rick. In closing, I'd like to thank our dedicated and talented team of professionals for their continued commitment to PNNT and its shareholders. Thank you all for your time today and for your continued investment and confidence in us. That concludes our remarks. At this time, I would like to open up the call to questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we will go first to Robert Dodd with Raymond James.

Hi. First question on the buyback program. Obviously, I mean you didn't utilize the buyback program in the December quarter. I could understand why. You had a lot of information, things going on. It expires, if I remember that, at the end of March. Can you give us any color on whether you expect to utilize that completed extend it? Any thoughts on that front?

Thanks, Rob. Yeah, we're always considering a stock buyback program. We've -- I think this might be our second or third program we've done. We are now 1.4 times levered at PNNT, which is a bit above our target leverage, and we're working with the rating agencies on our ratings. So stay tuned. Nothing really to announce at this point.

Got it. Got it. And then on one of the other portfolio at company, Walker Edison. Obviously, you did get -- it's been an issue. You talked about last quarter. I mean you're not the only BDC, and obviously, you're in with several other private credit platforms. Does that -- this effect that you're in it with -- so by your standards, a lot of other investors, obviously, by the syndicated market time number. Does that make anything more complicated, slower or more difficult in resolving that particular asset?

No. So Walker Edison has been troubled now for a couple of quarters. It's in restructuring as we speak. There's three public BDCs, including us, who have the asset. There's a fourth lender in it. So there's not a public BDC. So there's four lenders in total in that name. We're all going along very well. It's all very consensual. I think we all see things the same way. So it's really just about executing the restructuring and then operating the company hopefully well. We still think the company is a viable company that has a real place to be -- a real reason to be in the marketplace that has value. We will be converting the majority of the debt that we had into equity. We'll still have some debt, and then we're all putting in additional debt to fund liquidity needs -- a small amount on the liquidity needs for the company over the next few quarters. But we all are doing that in the belief that we think it's a viable long-term business, which had some non-recurring issues going on primarily with supply chain, but over the long run, should have a lot of value.

Got it. Got it. Thank you on that. And last one, if I can, on the dividend. Obviously, you increased it again. Earnings power trending up and that's even without rates. Obviously, the proceeds from RAM will be available and principle to invest in yielding assets. One of your comments in the beginning with the board raised the dividend in line with growth in earnings power. So is that something investors going to look forward to potentially again because all likelihood, earnings power is might be likely to ramp a little higher at least over the next several quarters.

Yeah. Look, we believe, based on today's interest rates, our NII is well covering the $0.185 dividend. So we think we're well covering it now. And you're right with the growth of the joint venture potentially to $1 billion, really without any incremental capital from us as well as the potential for RAM rotation. We think we have potential additional upside above and beyond that.

Got it. Thank you.

Thank you.

And we will go next to Ryan Lynch with KBW.

Hey, good afternoon. My first question, obviously, you talked about the exit of RAM Energy that's been a long state investment you guys have worked through a lot. Obviously, you're sort of turning the page on that. But I would just love to just -- before we completely turn the page on it, just for you visit kind of what occurred over the last 6 to 9 months? Because that investment started being written up pretty meaningfully earlier in 2022. And then last quarter, it had a pretty meaningful write-down and then the exit this quarter was -- significantly a little the previous value. So can you just talk about, I guess, what occurred? Was it something fundamentally in that business that didn't play out as expected? Or was it just the purchase -- the market when you guys were looking to sell? Didn't come to fruition as you would have liked? Or just any sort of comments on what sort of took place and how the ultimate value was decided.

Yeah. So it's certainly, again, we are disappointed with the outcome, and ultimately, it's a decision we turn the page or you take a disappointing result. We decided to -- or keep it alive and you keep going. And what happened, unfortunately, over the last six months or so as those last well or two, the results were not -- and there were some operational issues that came into freight with the last well -- in the four with the last well that unfortunately hurt the ultimate valuation. It was a very robust process. The M&A bank went out to over 100 people, other parties, and this was the end result. It's disappointing. Again, this is why at PennantPark, we will never do oil and gas again when the value of the company relies so much on one or two wells. So certainly, it's been a disappointing investment from the get go. We continue to be disappointing. We are hopeful and optimistic a while back because the results were really good. Oil and gas prices at one point were much higher than they are today. And I feel that we ran a very robust process. Of course, we're not pleased with the outcome. We are pleased to hopefully be turning the chapter here. I'm mentioning, this company again on future conference calls, but this is kind of the fact, and we ran a robust process and this is the outcome.

Yeah. Thanks for that back added color. Rick, maybe on that, you gave guidance for the additional excise taxes on a quarterly basis going forward. I'm just curious, I would presume the answer is, no. But does the exit and the loss of the realized loss you guys will occur in RAM Energy, will that have any potential to lower those excise taxes at all?

No. RAM is held within the corporate blocker. So the short answer is, no.

And then maybe following up on Robert's question regarding the buyback and leverage. I would just love to -- and you kind of mentioned you're talking about credit rating agencies today. You guys are above your target leverage range. I think that's maybe even a little bit high for where rating agencies are typically comfortable. Is it the plan do you think to get that leverage range down closer to the 1 25 level or -- in the near term? Or is this a level that you guys are comfortable operating at for the foreseeable future?

Yeah. Look, we're still working on that. The answer to that question, to be frank with you, the argument would be and we believe it, which is the portfolio that remains is mostly senior debt, first-lien debt, which might be justifiable to be at this kind of 1.4 times ratio. It's certainly less equity-heavy portfolio than we had. So I think we're going to be kind of somewhere between the 1.25 and 1.4-ish debt to equity. And certainly, the discussions with the rating agencies are important part of that analysis.

Of course. Okay, that’s all for me. I appreciate the time today.

Thank you.

We will go next to Casey Alexander with Compass Point.

Yeah, good afternoon. Switch gears just a little bit to a different topic. The company's position in Cano Health has been handcuffed and that it's under the control of the private equity sponsor. Have you considered restructuring your equity co-invest or not making equity co-invest, if they fall under the control of the private equity sponsor? Because the company has missed several attractive opportunities to monetize that investment, but the lack of control has all of a sudden resulted in what at this point in time is another poor surprise or a poor outcome. And is there something that you can do to mitigate that loss of control that gives you a better position to take advantage of attractive equity prices when they exist in future investments or not make them at all and get better terms on the debt?

A great question, and there's a couple discussion points that you brought up, which are really good discussion points. First of all, Cano Health itself, it's a mark-to-market. Deal is not done yet. They're the largest competitor. Oak Street Health announced yesterday that they were getting bought by CVS at a very high price. There is a bit of a turf grab going on in that primary care space. So we're not done yet. I would remind you that Humana is a minority shareholder of Cano Health. Whether they or other parties see value in Cano Health company that the company itself yet to be determined. It has been a volatile stock. It has been painful to watch the stocks trade lower over the course of the last three-six months. But we're not done yet on Cano Health and our belief is, over time, this company will ascertain real value above and beyond where it's being marked today. So that's Cano Health. Look, part and parcel of the equity coinvestment business, if you want to call it that is, you're lending money to the company, you're saying, the sponsor we want to ride alongside of you because we're helping to drive the growth, and we want to participate in the upside of the growth and we're also good partners. So in most of the cases, the exits are to strategic buyers or other larger private equity firms. Rarely is the exit to an IPO like Cano was. So in most cases, you can track it and we put it out there. The MOIC on our equity co-invest over 17 years is 2.3 times. It's about 27% IRR. And there are times, Casey, when equity looks really good, and there are times when it looks less good. We're now in one…

My next question is relative to the JV. Given the fact that you're effectively not only fully levered, but somewhat overlevered and likely are going to have to use repayments to reduce your leverage ratio to a certain extent. How does the JV go to $1 billion if you don't currently have the capability to add additional equity to support that growth?

The JV is financed to some extent with securitization/CLO leverage. The middle market first-lien loans that we do have proven to be really terrific collateral for the CLO securitization box. It's a strong box. We've led through during COVID. It's really good for middle market credit. There's lots of elements of middle market credit that make it even more appropriate than wrongly syndicated loan credit. To get to $1 billion, we don't need to do the degree on the CLO or anticipate doing that, but we do anticipate continuing to use securitization technology to finance the vehicle.

So you're saying that you're going to add leverage to the JV.

Over time, the leverage will be kind of probably 2 to 1 type of leverage. Again, we own 60% of it --

And what's the leverage in the JV right now?

It's about 2 to 1.

Thank you.

We will go to a question from Mickey Schleien of Ladenburg.

Yes. Art, a lot of good questions this afternoon. I just have one follow-up to Casey on the JV. The dividend that you accrued on the JV was up sharply versus the previous quarter, and it was also well above the GAAP net income for the quarter. And I realize there's differences between GAAP and tax and cash and things like that. But is the current dividend run rate at the JV that's being upstreamed to the BC sustainable? Or is there sort of a onetime non-recurring dividends received this quarter?

There's no non-recurring. It's a sustainable dividend. In fact, we're -- same thing we ever in the dividend and the JV.

You over earned it in terms of cash?

Yeah.

Thanks. Those are my only questions. Thank you.

And we'll go to our next question from Mike Ramirez with Truist Securities.

Yeah, good afternoon. What does the timing on when you get clarity from the rating agencies or when you work through that process? Does that impact your ability to invest in the second quarter here?

Yeah. Look, I think it's over the next couple of months. Again, the difference between 1.25 and 1.4 is really not that material, particularly with the type of portfolio we have, but it's something that we do need to solve this one.

Fair enough. And then of the five sectors that you target, anything in particular there that you're -- you feel like there's more deal flow or you have more interest in at this point given the macro backdrop?

Yeah. Certainly, we're one of the largest lenders to the government services, defense space. We think of that as a very steady, stable space. We have real domain expertise there. Given the geopolitical environment around the world, we think that's a space that will continue to grow and will experience tailwinds. Also, healthcare is a big space for us. Typically, healthcare services. And there, there is usually tailwinds through demographics. There, we just want to make sure that we keep our leverage appropriate and reasonable, but we've had a very nice track record in that vertical as well.

Thank you.

We will go to Melissa Wedel of JPMorgan.

Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions today. Just a follow-up on sort of the portfolio rotation component that you talked about today. I mean this has been something that you've talked about for more than just -- longer than just today. Given that the exit from RAM should bring equity -- the equity component of the portfolio down significantly. It would be helpful, I think, if you could update us on how you're thinking about equity as a component of the portfolio going forward? Where -- do you still target sort of a long-term 10% allocation? Or how you're thinking about?

Yeah. So it's a great question because there are some nuances in the answer, which is, we have this joint venture in PSLF. Of course, that is equity, but we don't count that as kind of a true equity coinvest like we would elsewhere. So we have to exclude that. And I don't have it at my fingertips when our equity with ran out of the portfolio, excluding PSLF. What our equity percentage would be. Rick, do you have it?

14%.

14%. So 14% excluding PSLF, excluding RAM is still kind of in the zone. Probably, a little high. I think we'd still probably target 10%, but 14% is not that wildly off kind of our long-term target.

Okay. That's helpful. Thanks. And then as a follow-up to the question about sort of recycling capital given where leverage is right now. Is there anything that we should be thinking about in terms of visibility that you have on additional repayments outside of the $32 million expected from RAM in the near term? Thank you.

Yeah. No. Yes. No, in this environment, both deal activity and repayments have slowed down a little bit, and they're usually related. There's usually a corollary between new deals and repayments. They slowed down a little bit, but we do -- we are getting methodical episodic repayments. That's one of like things about a loan portfolio. It's under incorrectly. You will get repayments. Sometimes it's faster. Sometimes it's slower. It's been on the slower end recently, but we are getting repayments. Nothing that material in and of itself, but kind of a drift trip over time on the repayments.

Thank you, Art.

And I would now like to turn the call back to Art Penn for any additional or closing remarks.

Yeah. Thank you, everybody, for participating today on our conference call. We will speak with you next in early May as we go through the 3/31 results. Thank you for participating today.

And this concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.