Paul Middleton
Analyst · Sameer Joshi with H.C. Wainwright
Thanks, Jose Luis, and good afternoon, everyone. Jose Luis covered this quarter's revenue. I just would add that through the 9 months, we're at $542 million, up about 12% year-over-year. Gross margin was negative 2.7%, a roughly 65 percentage point improvement from negative 68% a year ago. It was slightly below our Q2 of '26, and I'll explain why, but the year-over-year trend shows the structural changes we've made are working. Revenue -- equipment revenue was $106 million, up from $97 million, driven by material handling. GenDrive deployments more than doubled, and we recognized 9 hydrogen site installations versus none a year ago. Year-to-date, we've already surpassed last year's material handling sales. Electrolyzer revenue was down about $40 million year-over-year, primarily on deployment timing. For the year, we expect electrolyzers to be slightly down versus last year. However, it's important to understand the dynamics of this market. As we've established this business, the early deployments were mainly small industrial applications and stack sales. Recently, we have shifted the focus to larger scale deployments and a much bigger pipeline. The overall portfolio traction in this transition is just coming into its own scale. The future growth will be driven by energy security and energy independence and decarbonization, as Jose Luis mentioned, and is anchored in real projects. 50 megawatts with Orica now in execution, the Carlton Power project in the U.K., 280 megawatts signed with Arcadia pending FID, 270 megawatts with Hy2gen in the FEED process and all the megawatts we are commissioning. Now on equipment margin, it was essentially breakeven versus negative 77% a year ago, driven by restructuring, volume, pricing and much lower inventory adjustments. Sequentially, it was a bit below Q2 because of electrolyzer scale-up costs, partly offset by better material handling margins. Also of note, customer warrant charges, which reduced revenue were higher in the quarter. It was $14.4 million versus $10.9 million a year ago, reflecting increased sales to Amazon. On service revenue, it grew 47% to $29 million, and margin reached 31%, up from 27% in Q2 and negative 2% a year ago. Better reliability means each technician covers more units and parts consumption is almost 50% down year-over-year. On PPA revenue, it was $28 million, up 13%. Margin improved to negative 16% from about negative 30% in Q2 and negative 85% a year ago. This was driven by pricing, lower maintenance costs and lower lease costs from our buyout program. Fuel revenue was $38 million, up 6% year-over-year. Margin was negative 52% versus negative 79% a year ago. This was on higher pricing and lower production and purchased fuel costs. Now the Q3 margin was slightly behind the Q2 because of unplanned outages at our plants in Q3, which forced more external purchases. These issues are largely resolved, and we've rebalanced sourcing, so we expect fuel margin to improve in Q4. Operating expenses for the quarter were $70 million, and this included gains and losses from asset monetizations and contract terminations. Normalizing for those and other unusual items, we see about $70 million to $75 million is the right near-term run rate. Net income attributed to Plug was $99.8 million or $0.07 positive per basic share. That reflects $192 million in noncash mark-to-market gains on our convertible notes and warrant liability, which equates to about $0.12 EPS on a diluted basis. Excluding those gains, we would have reported a net loss, but a far smaller one than a year ago, which reflects real operating improvement. These adjustments will continue each quarter in either direction until the instruments mature or are settled. Net cash usage was about $28 million, down from $61 million in Q2 and $145 million in Q1, and we raised no capital. Asset monetizations helped fund the year without dilution. Underneath that, the operating improvement is real, higher gross margin, structurally lower OpEx and reduced maintenance CapEx. Two monetization updates. On Stream, we received about $51 million this year, including $46 million in Q3. The remaining stages for this project depend on regulatory and permitting steps in Texas and New York that have taken longer than expected. Stream remains under contract and engaged, and we have -- but we have not included any of these proceeds in our Q4 forecast. Separately, we're working to release about $62 million of restricted cash posted as collateral for power supply at our Texas plant, targeting the end of Q1 '27. Inventory is down about $49 million from the year-end, and we expect another meaningful reduction in Q4. We ended the quarter with $134 million in unrestricted cash and $469 million in restricted cash. We think there's a good chance that Q4 net cash usage may be relatively flat. This means we could continue to not need new capital to fund our operational plan in the near term. We're reaffirming our full year revenue guidance, as Jose Luis said, to 15% to 16%, which implies Q4 revenue of roughly about $280 million. That's driven mainly by equipment in terms of growth and supported by our backlog and customer schedules. The biggest driver is material handling. We have a pipeline to potentially ship more GenDrive units in Q4 than the first 9 months combined, and this is at stronger contribution margins. We remain focused on positive EBITDAS in Q4, and this path runs mainly through gross margin, stemming from equipment volume leverage, manufacturing cost reductions, service reliability, fuel cost optimization and continued PPA buyouts. Volume and mix will determine the final result, but we believe we're well positioned. With that, let's open the line up for questions, and I'll turn it back to the operator.