Thank you, Kevin. As Chief Technology Officer, I look forward to leading the product development and technology advancement of NPS technology and our CellFX system. And I'm excited to be working closely with our Chief Strategy Officer, Mitch Levinson, to move our NPS technologies into new application areas. At Pulse Biosciences, we have developed a novel and proprietary tissue treatment platform based on Nano-Pulse Stimulation or NPS where ultra fast electrical energy pulses with nanosecond pulse durations from billions up to a millionth of a second are used to stimulate cellular effects that can lead to positive therapeutic outcomes. NPS is broadly considered a pulse field technology, but the use of nanosecond duration pulses leads to a highly differentiated cellular mechanism of action that can be applied to a number of important clinical applications. And nanosecond pulse is an incredibly fast pulse. To give a sense of the scale, a nanosecond is to a second what a second is to 31.7 years. It’s an incredibly short amount of time. We have demonstrated that when these incredibly fast energy pulses are applied to cells, they penetrate the cell and disrupt the function of the internal organelles of the cell by creating small holes in the organelle membranes known as poration. These organelles include the mitochondria, which is the cell’s power plant and the endoplasmic reticulum, which plays an important role in protein synthesis. When the function of these organelles is disrupted, cell goes through a natural regulated cell death process. This ability to get inside the cell with a non-toxic application of electrical energy, while preserving the integrity of the outer cell membrane to initiate regulated cell death is a cornerstone of NPS. The regulated cell death process leads to a more natural healing response as the body’s immune system is accustomed to dealing with cell death through this natural and regulated mechanism as opposed to sudden necrotic cell death caused by other energy-based therapies, which can lead to a significant inflammatory response that slows the return to normal tissue function. We believe it is this ability to initiate regulated cell death through the temporary formation of pores in intracellular organelle membranes that importantly differentiates NPS from other energy-based therapies such as irreversible electroporation and radiofrequency ablation. Another important and unique feature of NPS is a lack of impact it has on acellular structures such as the extracellular tissue that provides the tissue architecture to promote healing. While thermal energy modalities will destroy all tissue indiscriminately, NPS has a selective mechanism that impacts cells but leaves the structure, which typically is made of collagen intact, allowing the tissue to heal in a more natural way. NPS also has been shown to spare nerve fibers or those parts of the nerve that carry electrical impulses and blood vessel architecture and tissue. Another significant benefit when the therapeutic intent is to clear unwanted cells and promote healing and a return to normal tissue function. This novel mechanism of action has been demonstrated in human clinical and preclinical studies across a large number of organs and tissue types and evidence supporting this has been published in a number of peer reviewed publications. Some of these can be found on our website. The CellFX System is our commercial NPS delivery platform. We design this system with a goal of being able to apply it to a defined set of potential therapeutic applications. The CellFX System is FDA cleared, has the CE mark and Canadian approval for use in dermatology. Over 6,000 patients have been treated in dermatology to date with the CellFX System demonstrating that eye and skin lesions can be safely cleared and result in superior cosmesis when compared to thermal modalities. We’ve learned a great deal from our experience in dermatology. First and foremost that our CellFX System is indeed a platform that can deliver NPS based therapies safely and effectively in multiple skin locations from the head to the feet. We have validated this novel mechanism of action the ability to non-thermally destroy unwanted cells, in this case unwanted benign lesions such as common moles, while sparing the acellular dermal tissue leading to a healing response that returns the skin to its normal appearance. These learnings and the histologic and clinical data we’ve generated in skin provide a foundation we will leverage going forward. The standard-of-care and cardiac tissue ablation for the treatment of AF today is the use of thermal ablation modalities, primarily the use of radiofrequency ablation. While thermal modalities have been used for this application for many years, the efficacy remains disappointing. This is largely due to the safety concerns regarding collateral thermal damage to surrounding tissue vessels and nerves. This safety concern leads to under treatment, treatment failures and less than satisfactory efficacy for physicians and patients. We believe our NPS technology can potentially overcome these issues because it will enable physicians to treat more thoroughly with less liability for collateral damage that thermal modalities have. Based on our preclinical data and unique applicator designs, we believe NPS powered by the CellFX System has the potential to provide a faster, more precise and safer treatment than the standard-of-care. Although it’s early in the development cycle in recent years, others have been pursuing cardiac ablation with alternative pulse field technologies. These technologies generally referred to as irreversible electroporation or IRE, use pulse duration that are orders of magnitude longer than NPS, generally from 100 times to 1,000 times longer and rely on a mechanism of action for cell death that destroys the outer cell membrane, resulting in acute cellular necrosis and significant post-treatment inflammation. And in some cases IRE systems have been shown to have a thermal damage component as well. We believe our CellFX System can offer significant advantages over these longer pulse with IRE systems in terms of the safety and efficacy profile, but also in terms of the procedure itself where IRE can cause large muscle contraction of the patient during treatment and unanticipated cardiac rhythm events. We do not believe these issues will exist with NPS. Today, we are developing an NPS-enabled catheter approach to treating AF performed by electrophysiologists and an NPS-enabled surgical approach performed by cardiac surgeons. We believe NPS can support a significantly differentiated solution in both of these important AF therapeutic approaches and are working closely with top KOLs in both areas. We have encouraging early preclinical data using novel proprietary devices designed by our team and others and being used with the CellFX platform. These data give us confidence that NPS powered by our CellFX System can enable not only a potentially more efficacious and safe procedure, but one that can be faster and simpler to perform than the current standard-of-care. We look forward to providing updates on our progress in this area as we reach important milestones. Now, I’ll turn the call over to Sandy for an update on our financial results.