Good day everyone and welcome to The Children’s Place third quarter conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, you will have the opportunity to ask questions during the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions) It is now my pleasure to turn the program over to Ms. Jane Singer. Go ahead, ma’am.

Thank you, Austin. Good morning everyone and thank you for joining us today for a review of The Children’s Place Retail Stores Inc 2008 third quarter and year-to-date financial results. Participating on this mornings call are Chuck Crovitz, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Sue Riley, Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration. Also, on hand to answer questions at the end of managements remarks are Richard Flaks, Senior Vice President, Planning Allocation and Information Technology, and Dina Sweeney, Group Vice President of Merchandising. Before we begin, I would like to remind participants that any forward-looking remarks made today are subject to the Safe Harbor Statement found in this morning’s press release, as well as in our SEC filings and now I will turn the call over to Chuck for his opening remarks.

Thank you, Jane. Good morning everyone. Thank you for joining us today. Earlier this morning we reported our third quarter 2008 financial results. We delivered positive top line and bottom line growth for the quarter in spite of reduced shopper traffic and a more challenging macroeconomic environment. This speaks to the strength and resilience of The Children’s Place brand. To briefly review the highlights of our financial performance during the quarter, net sales increased by 5%; comparable store sales increased by 2%; ecommerce sales increased by 40%, and excluding unusual and one time items, income from continuing operations increased 28% to $24.9 million or $0.84 a share during the third quarter of 2008. This compares to $19.4 million or $0.66 a share in the third quarter of last year. During previous conference calls, I have talked to you about four significant actions that we undertook during the past year in order to strengthen our business and ensure the long term success of The Children’s Place. Looking back, I can tell you that we are very glad that we took those actions when we did, because they have significantly contributed to the solid results that we are reporting today. Our first action was reducing inventory levels, which we believe were too high during 2007. At the time of our decision last year, we were able to partially impact the summer 2008 buy and fully impact the back-to-school and holiday buys. With lower inventories, we were able to better manage our markdown levels, significantly improve our gross margins, enhance the shop ability of our stores and at the same time, deliver modest increase in comp sales. Second, we identified a number of opportunities to reduce our cost structure. We implemented a work force reduction in our shared services department. We have also…

Thank you Chuck and good morning everyone. Most of my discussions today will focus on continuing operations, which is The Children’s Place business only. As previously disclosed, we have classified the Disney Store business as continued operations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, given our decision to exit that business. Net sales from The Children’s Place business for the third quarter ended November 1, 2008 increased 5% to $450.6 million from $430.6 million last year. Contributing factors to the sales growth were comparable store sales, which increased 2% on top of a 1% increase last year; eCommerce sales, which grew more than 40% for the quarter and growth in our store base. At the end of the third quarter 2008, our store count was 920 compared to 907 stores at the end of the third quarter last year. During the quarter, sales were negatively impacted by the decline in the Canadian exchange rate relative to the US dollar. The currency swing negatively impacted our top line sales by approximately $3.6 million compared to the third quarter of 2007. Our 2% increase in comp sales for the quarter was the result of a 4% decline in store transactions, consistent with the 3.4% decline in mall traffic, offset by a 6% increase in average transaction size. Units per transaction decreased in the mid-single digits. This was offset by a low double-digit increase in average unit retail as a result of our lower markdown rate. Our strongest regions were metro New York, the Northeast, the Mid-Atlantic, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and the Southwest and the west was the weakest region. Gross profit dollars increased 14% to $196.4 million. Gross margin increased 360 basis points to 43.6% from 40% in the third quarter of fiscal 2007. The increase is the result of fewer markdowns,…

Thanks, Sue. To wrap up, we are encouraged by our performance for the fiscal year to date and remain cautious due to the current economic environment. Thanks and with that, operator I’d like to open it up for questions.

(Operator Instructions) Your first question comes from John Zolidis - Buckingham Research.

I have two questions. The first one, you laid out at the beginning of the call the four strategic actions that you embarked upon at the beginning of the year and certainly in retrospect or in hindsight, those appear to have been very prudent decisions. I was wondering is there a part two to this strategic approach to running the business? In other words, now that we’ve accomplished a number of the things that you laid out at that time, what’s the next step to improving profitability of the business and really streamlining things going forward? Thanks.

I think that we’re going to continue with these strategies that we’ve laid out, because I don’t think we’ve finished with them. Certainly, the inventory levels, we’re going to have to keep pressure on in this economic environment and I think that in terms of the cost structure, we’ve begun that and we definitely instilled in the culture, but we have to continue to drive these costs out of the company and we are going to continue to support the business through growth in our stores and our eCom growth. So I do think that the strategies that we’ve laid out are going to continue here for the foreseeable future, as we begin to recover out of this economy.

And my second question, thank you for sharing that data on the kids business with the unit sales up 3%, average unit retail down 4%. Can you remind us of the demographic data that may be supporting increases in unit sales for children? I believe in the past, the company had shared some demographic data. Is there any update on what’s going on with the number of kids out there and so on?

Yes, in terms of the demographics, they are very favorable for our business. I think we’re now in a new baby boom, which we’ve had a number of births this last year, actually exceeded the number of births in the ‘50s and we see just dramatic growth in the children’s population that are in our core markets. So from a demographic standpoint, I think we’re doing quite well. We also see faster growth of minority populations in the economy and we perform very well with those groups as well. So from a demographic standpoint, I think things are moving towards us.

Your next question comes from Kimberly Greenberger - CitiGroup.

I’m wondering, I know you’re not providing any guidance today for the fourth quarter, but just for planning purposes, can we assume SG&A dollars in the fourth quarter would be similar to the SG&A dollars during the third quarter or are you looking at them to be up slightly?

About similar Kimberly; if you take out the one-time items because the Disney transitional income is winding down.

Right; so if I use the base in the third quarter of $133.6 million in SG&A, is that the right base to use?

Yes.

Okay and you’ve got a nice build of cash on your balance sheet. I noticed, obviously for the last couple of quarters you’ve had a piece of that term loan in short-term debt, the $30 million. When are you anticipating paying that down?

That’s correct, Kimberly. The $30 million is characterized as short term debt and the reason for that is because as part of the term loan agreement, we’re required to pay down a portion of our closing cash balance and so we expect at this point in time that we’ll pay down $30 million as we exit this fiscal year and then the same provisions would apply to the end of fiscal 2009.

Okay, and the end of ‘09, is it the same dollar amount, another $30 million next year or does it depend on your ending ‘09 cash balance?

It depends on the ending ‘09 cash balance but I would say for planning purposes, order of magnitude, I would use that amount, roughly $30 million.

So I guess any other uses for that cash on your balance sheet other than the sort of gradual paydown of that debt?

At this point in time, I think we just want to hold tight with the cash on the balance sheet and weather the next few quarters and then make some decisions as to whether or not, what we want to do with it.

Okay and then one last question on the balance sheet. Sue, there’s a $104 million other current asset, could you just talk about the composition there and if there’s an opportunity to turn any of that into cash any time soon?

No, not really I would say at this point. Basically as you look at the balance sheet, I would make the assumption that the inventory will result in cash and we’ll of course reinvest back in inventory. The other current assets, I would expect to continue to be in the range of about $100 million through 2009.

Your next question comes from Betty Chen - Wedbush Morgan.

Sue, I know you mentioned earlier, if I got the numbers right, it looks like the carry over inventory was a little bit high at the end of the third quarter, at least higher than last year. Could you speak to that a little bit, please?

It’s a little bit higher; Richard, do you want to answer that?

Yes, it’s up three tenths of a, so it’s 3.1% versus 2.8%. Part of the function of that is that total inventory is lower. So actually on a dollar basis, there’s less carry over inventory. We feel really comfortable with having 3% of our inventory in prior season, not current season goods. So anything under 5% is a comfortable pace for us and we have no concern that we can clear that inventory out during this holiday time period.

Betty, may I also just add to that, that last year if you recall, we had a bad fall season and so we were marking down just to basically get rid of merchandise. So the disparity in the two numbers is more a function of us having been a little bit lower last year. If you go back to 2006, we’re right in line and as Richard said, we’re very comfortable that we can liquidate that inventory.

And then when we think about merchandise plans for the first half, I know you mention that there will be some timing differences because of the Chinese New Year, but currently, as we stand and as we think about the buy for the first half, are we planning them to be down so far year-over-year or kind of what are the thoughts there?

We really don’t give inventory guidance specifically out beyond one quarter, but directionally, we are continuing to plan the inventory conservatively next year to support a conservative sales growth. The only area that we are investing a little bit more aggressively in is eCommerce because we do see some upside growth from an eCommerce perspective. So pretty much directionally, we’re expecting inventory to be anywhere between flattish to down a little bit, so we’re going to remain conservative.

Okay and on that front, are we seeing any sort of product cost pressure? It seems like that’s now dissipating. So are we able to see some favorable terms for product costs next year?

Yes, I think that this is probably more of a complicated story here. The sourcing is definitely one of our core competencies and we did note in earlier calls that the IMU would be down slightly this year. Although, so far we thought we’d be able to sort of largely mitigate the pressures we have in Asia and this has proven true. Although, the IMU has sort of gone up and down as we’ve gone through the different quarters. During the first half of the year, we really benefited from a mix standpoint, particularly, because we have less denim and that helped the IMU, but in the second half, we are experiencing a bit more of the IMU pressure due to the lower Canadian exchange rate primarily and the mix because we’re tending to get into more basics and as I mentioned, more trading down that we’re seeing from the consumer side. We also are continuing to see cost increases as a result of commodity and fuel prices compared to earlier this year. Now, we are starting to see some moderation of those commodities but they are still not down below a level that they were a year ago. So we’ve got kind of a balance of kind of favorable and unfavorable factors but I think the net of it is that we’ll probably mitigate most, but not all of these cost pressures in overseas sourcing. The favorable factors are that we’ve got lower retail demand globally and these, as I mentioned, these recent reduction in oil and commodity price; lower, but not lower than a year ago. Unfavorably, we have negative exchange rates in Canada; we have less supply, as many of the factories, particularly those in southern China, have closed or suspended their operations; we have some higher labor costs in China due to new labor laws; we have some higher costs of environmental initiatives and higher cost of capital financing for some of these factories. So, again, net-net, I think we’re going to be able to offset much, though not all of the cost pressures going forward.

And Chuck, I know that we’ve been trying to diversify sourcing away from China, which I think at one point was close to 50% of the merchandise buy; what is kind of the update there and the progress?

We’re continuing to do that. China’s down a little bit lower than that now and we’re continuing to look at some of these other economies, particularly Bangladesh and India and we’re working something in Africa and exploring some of the other southeastern Asian economies as well, but definitely China is starting to come down and we’re focusing more on other economies.

And then lastly if I could, Sue. When we think about the fourth quarter and maybe some of the one-time items so far this year, should we still expect a potential gain for the Disney Store services and also store impairment charge. As well as, how should we think about the Canadian dollar impact?

Okay. I’ll take the last part of your question first. We generally don’t forecast exchange rates, so internally we’re planning for the Canadian dollar to be about where it is now. So I would expect roughly the same impact. Although, some of that will depend on the Canadian balance sheet and how that gets translated back, but I think you should prepare for roughly the same Canadian dollar, what we’re seeing now and I’m sorry, I just drew blank; what was your second question?

In terms of store impairment and Disney Stores?

Impairment charges we evaluate quarterly. We’ll basically look at the profitability of each store in our fleet at the end of the quarter and make a decision as to whether or not we need to take any impairment charges. So we generally don’t provide guidance on impairments because it will really depend on how each store does at this important quarter.

And then what about any gains for the Disney Store?

That’s winding down, so we’re just about out of that. You’re likely to see a very small net profit, but it will be diminimus.

Your next question comes from Brian Tunick - JPMorgan.

One for Chuck and then one for sue. I guess, first for Chuck. I’m just curious, how you think about your value message, whether that’s in stores or in marketing and your tier pricing strategy. How does that flex, I guess when everyone in the mall is screaming value at the customer. Then for Sue, maybe just talk on the SG&A side, Maybe when we think about the buckets of opportunities for 2009 and beyond, besides corporate overhead, is there also store payroll, marketing, processes, things like that, that we can look for more SG&A to come out of the model? Thanks very much.

Yes, no; I think in terms of our value messaging, first of all, we have very low prices, very good value prices relative to most of our mall competitors and I think our customers recognize that and as I mentioned, we are running aggressive promotions and Black Friday, will continue to take markdowns. We just won’t have to take nearly the level that we did last year, but I still think just given our overall price level being so much more favorable than most of our competition and coupled with the strong promotions that we’re planning through the holiday season, I think we’re going to be fine.

And then on SG&A Brian, I would expect you’re going to see a continuation. It’s going to be more of the same, because bear in mind you didn’t get the full year impact this year of some of the actions that we had taken and then you asked specifically about marketing and our market is just constantly honing in on the marketing spend to get sharper and sharper. An example of that is what was done in the second quarter, where they didn’t drop the bulk of the Mag logs and at the time when a large percentage of the store was on sale. So we’re really just trying to focus that marketing in on when we have the most full price merchandise available in the store and that’s resulting from some leverage of marketing this year and again next year.

And if I could just ask one more; have you said what the total liabilities could be for the bankrupt estate of Hoop.

The liabilities are stated on the balance sheet, so you can see them and they are still carried on the balance sheet. What we have said that we expect the cash costs to The Children’s Place of exiting that business to be approximately $50 million. Well basically that number has not changed, most of that has been paid out, but there is a small amount that we expect to be paid out between now and the final liquidation of the estate.

Your next question comes from Janet Kloppenburg - JJK Research.

Sue and Chuck, I was just wondering if we should expect the impact from the Canadian currency to continue to be a detriment to the earnings results at the same level for the fourth quarter and what’s the outlook for the first half of ‘09 as well?

Well, I would say that right now I’m not an economist as you well know, but I think I’m not reading anything that says that the Canadian dollar is going to strengthen markedly. Again as you know, it’s a currency that seems to fluctuate depending on oil pricing. We might see some fluctuation, but at this point in time, we are planning for the Canadian dollar to remain pretty much as it is for the fourth quarter and for the first half of next year.

Okay. So we should factor that into our estimates and that could also sort of constrain the reported comp level, but you usually break it out for us anyway, isn’t that right?

That’s right. We break it out for you.

Okay and on the SG&A fund, I think one of the reasons why the wait was up beyond bonus accrual in the third quarter and it may have had to do with the shift in marketing spend, out of Q2 into Q3 and I’m wondering, what’s happening specifically on the marketing spend for the fourth quarter versus last year’s fourth quarter?

That’s correct, Janet. I think I had said in my prepared remarks that there was a 20 basis point impact to SG&A from that shift in marketing from Q2 into Q3. I think at this point, Q4, to be about comparable as a percentage of sales to last year.

Okay, great and then I just wanted to address your inventory planning for the end of the year. It looks like it will still be very lean, but down considerably less than it is now and I’m just thinking about the economy and the outlook for a tough first half next year and I’m just wondering if this is where you want to be, at minus low single digits at year end.

Yes Janet, let me try to explain that one. First of all, a couple of other data points on end of year inventory. We do expect to be down in the low single digits, as I said. One of the things that’s impacting that’s not causing that to be even lower than that is the fact that we made an investment in eCommerce. So there’s a chunk of eCommerce inventory over last year that gets added into the inventory, but obviously eCommerce doesn’t add to the square footage. So we’re actually increasing inventory per square foot because of eCommerce. If you look at just the stores piece of it, we’re probably projecting down, closer to the mid-single digits negative. That’s obviously, not down by as much as the double digits that we’re seeing now, but if you look at what we’re up against, a year ago inventory per square foot was reported up 24% at the end of the third quarter and up 9% at the end of the fourth quarter. So the two year comparisons are very different. So, part of the reduction at the end of this third quarter is because we were just so high last year. So to answer your question in total, is we are very comfortable with are we are ending the inventory and it’s right in line with where we planned.

Okay good and I think Chuck; you said that you’re cautiously optimistic on the new holiday line that’s been in the stores for about a week now.

It’s just been in actually a couple of days.

Okay, I thought I had seen some over the weekend. I thought it looked very good.

Some has dribbled in early, but the full set was up this week.

Right, and I recently got the circular that came in the mail offering the regular discounts that you usually do and I’m wondering what your cirque rate is on that versus last year.

Yes, we don’t provide that information. Sorry.

Your next question comes from Linda Tsai - MKM Partners.

Any color on mall and off-mall performance during the quarter?

Yes, I mean what we’ve seen is that the malls have definitely been weaker than the off-malls in terms of what’s been going on in traffic.

And then in terms of store payroll, what are you doing there specifically to drive more efficient practices?

Well, we’ve had quite a bit of re-engineering in that area over the last couple of years, where we’ve had initiatives to try and make our merchandise much more floor ready when it comes from overseas. We’ve also changed a lot of our flow patterns to try and reduce some of the initial inventory we put in the store and replenish more frequently changing those kind of balances, so that we’re a lot more efficient and we’ll be doing a lot more in terms of labeling and staging the cartons in a way that make it much more efficient for the stores. So that has been a big effort of the company over the last several years and will continue.

What parts of that are kind of driving the savings that you were able to see in the quarter?

I don’t think we can specifically figure out how much of the savings we’ve seen have come from those kinds of savings versus just adopting a more conservative posture with respect to our labor given this environment. I think what we recognize is that there’s a lot more volatility in terms of when customers come in. They shop much closer than they need, so what we try to do is to plan very conservatively and watch our sales mix. We’ve got the sales associates there when we have the volume and not other times.

Are you training your sales associates any differently to interact with the customer?

No, we have not made any changes in those policies.

And then just one final question; in terms of the marketing that you’re doing in magazines, what are you doing there specifically and are you seeing better conversion from those incentives you were talking about?

A lot of our marketing is in direct mail and that’s the area we can measure very effectively. Most of the magazine is not as measurable as the direct mail. I think in this environment, we’ve tended to put more of our emphasis on the direct mail, where we’re getting good returns and on the margins, slightly deemphasized some of the magazines.

Your next question comes from John Morris - Wachovia.

Sue, I think in your prepared remarks, on the SG&A discussion, you talked about 120 basis points of leverage that you were getting specifically from some of the cost initiatives you’ve been taking and better store expense and administrative expense reduction, which is pretty impressive. When did those specific initiatives start? Just reminds us or did they begin in the current quarter? Maybe dive a little bit deeper. I know you kind of touched on some of the responses or Chuck did with Linda’s question, but maybe dug a little bit deeper on some of the other areas, so we can kind of get a sense of the benefit going forward and then a couple follow-ups.

Okay. So on SG&A, I would say you saw the full impact of our reductions really in the second quarter. This is a carry-over from the second quarter. As Chuck said in his remarks, it’s just changing the culture to one of cost containment, which is happening and we expect to continue to happen through 2009. In terms of specifics, I mean basically we’ve just gone through every single department in the company. The store’s organization did take a layer out of store management. They had an assistant manager position that they did in fact take out and that was effective in May of 2008 and then through 2009, I think you can just expect to see more of the same; we’ll be annualizing it and then just chipping away at our overall cost structure. Specific initiatives are things like just basic blocking and tackling, pooling all of our paper buy, so we realize more of a quantity discount.

Renegotiating freight rates, telephone rates.

It’s just going back out there to vendors and renegotiating in a very tough environment.

I think it’s a lot to just trying to hold our growth and costs very conservatively as we grow our top line and I think that dynamic is going to pay great dividends over the long run for the company.

And what happens is that the culture starts to change. You find the people rather than coming forward to try to sell a new position or to try and say “you guys need to really fill this immediately when someone leaves.” What happens is they come forward and they say, “You know, I think I can hang on a few months. Let’s see how it goes” and really it’s just a change in the mindset.

Then also from a merchandising perspective, where do you see the opportunity for the holiday merchandise assortment this year versus last year, just talking about product a little more for Q4?

So we are actually standing behind the glacier fleece, the micro fleece, we have in the stores and the fleece hoodies. We also believe that sweaters will perform strongly for holiday and the coordinating accessories that go with that, we really believe are going to be the drivers this season.

Your next question comes from Thomas Filandro - SIG.

Two questions; one question is you had double-digit increase in AUR during the quarter, the function of the inventory levels in much better shape and better full price selling and the like. Should we anticipate a similar trend in AUR in the fourth quarter, first question?

Yes Tom, first of all it is better full price selling, but it’s also on the markdown selling, we’re getting a much higher AUR, because we’re not strong go as deep even on the markdowns. Directionally, we expect that to continue into the fourth quarter and then start mitigating as we get into the first half of next year.

Okay thanks Richard and I guess the related question to that is maybe the markdown rate as it stands currently, how is that relative to historic norms? I know obviously you had a lot more inventory in the pipeline last year; you’ve cut back significantly. Is there still room to improve the markdown rate significantly or the regular price selling rate?

Again, we see similar type of markdown rate improvements in Q4 as to what we’ve seen; maybe a little bit less but similar to what we’ve seen in the last couple of quarters. There’s a little bit of room for improvement in the first half of next year further. We are not planning for any meaningful improvement in the back half of next year at this stage.

Okay great and just first of all a quick question to Chuck, Sue; are you guys still in a strategic review, or is that over?

No, we’re still in the strategic review. I think we’ve talked about it before; it’s still ongoing, the Board is still reviewing strategic alternatives. Our CEO search is still ongoing.

And in the strategic review, is there a consulting firm behind that? Wasn’t it Lehman originally?

Yes, we’d announced that sometime ago Lehman Brothers was helping us, now Barclays.

Okay and shoes, any update there?

Shoes, yes we’re continuing to make progress on shoes. The consumer acceptance continues to be very strong. We’ve made a lot of adjustments out of our first year of learning with the SKU counts and the mix between the various different classifications of shoes and basically, them allowing inventory to live longer. So I think we’re pleased with the progress that we’re making on shoes and we’re doing a lot of testing in terms of improving some of the operating issues in the store and have made good progress. We’re still not to the point where we want to aggressively roll it out but we’re pleased with the progress we’re making.

Your next question comes from Marnie Shapiro - The Retail Tracker. Marnie Shapiro – The Retail Tracker : I have a couple of quick questions. Can you update us on any shrink issues that you’re seeing, hearing or accounting for? And then on the product side, can you just talk a little bit about how newborn is doing and some of your one off sets, like Halloween, for example, and your most recent pajama and robe sets looked very, very good and have made quite a presence in the stores. So I was curious how those capsules are doing.

Okay. I’ll take the shrink question first. We’re not seeing a meaningful change in shrink at this point in time. Shrink for this company has historically been very, very low. So even at times when we see slight increases, the impact to our overall financials is generally not that great, but we’re not seeing a market change in shrink at this point. Now, Dina will answer your product questions.

In terms of newborn, we did have a bit of a tough third quarter for newborn along with baby boy and girl. We are seeing that change as we go to the dressy lines for holidays, so we did see a shift with holiday one and we are continuing to see that right now. In terms of Halloween, Halloween actually we are very pleased with. We reduced the inventory levels that we had compared to last year and the sales were extremely productive. We were actually able to comp that holiday with less inventories. In regards to the PJs, it did start out a bit slower than we had anticipated, but we’ve seen that change over the past week and a half. So we are feeling good about where the PJs are sitting right now. Marnie Shapiro – The Retail Tracker : Is there opportunity heading into next year to do more capsules like that, that are very targeted and encompass more of the store, because it goes from almost newborn straight up.

Yes, we’re looking at that as we’re focusing on fall and holiday of next year. So we are positioning things like that.

Your next question comes from Dana Telsey - Telsey Advisory.

Can you talk a little bit about what would be the stair steps to achieving the higher operating margin in terms of levers on gross margin and SG&A; are there any infrastructure elements that allows you to get there in terms of returning to that? Also, what do you see on the penetration of lower price product and that impact on margin and just lastly, the online business has been enhanced lately; how are the learning’s of that relative to the store? What’s the same and what’s different? Thank you.

Yes, I think in terms of getting the operating margins up, I think what the drivers there are going to be, one of the big drivers will be continuing to hold are costs reasonably flat relative to the growth of the sales and that’s going to leverage it a great deal and the second thing that really helps to drive that is placing a lot more emphasis on the growth of eCom where the margins are much stronger. I think those are things that will help that.

Yes, that’s really it. It’s basically curtailing the growth in SG&A to less than the growth in sales and if you run the math, you can plan for relatively modest sales growth driven by new stores and eCom, as Chuck said and then as we really manage that SG&A and hold the line on SG&A growth, you really do see the leverage over time. It’s not really margin expansion; it’s a little bit of margin expansion, but not a lot.

And then lower priced product; how is that doing in the margin impact?

We always look at our business in terms of good, better, best and we’re definitely are seeing the shift in this economy to more, more good and less better and best. Sue do you have anything to add on that?

We are seeing that and we’re seeing a lot of the two-for items that we have within the store really resonating well with the customer.

Your final question comes from John Zolidis - Buckingham Research.

Two quick questions. On the gross margin, when we think about the fourth quarter, is the potential for gross margin improvement more akin to what we saw in the third quarter or can you say is it greater than what we saw in the third quarter or about the same. I assume not similar to the standout performance that happened in the second quarter. Then my second question is obviously you had a 2% comp in the third quarter which was significantly better than the vast majority of retail. Many retailers have talked about how they’ve seen sales really fall off a cliff here in November, but clearly your business has been more resilient year-to-date and you obviously have the demographic tail wind. Is it safe to say that you’re not seeing that same kind of significant deceleration as we head into November? Thank you.

Okay, on the gross margin, yes we had said even when we announced the second quarter, that the second quarter was a real standout quarter. I would expect to see gross margin at this point in time, with of course a lot of variables in Q4 pretty much comparable to Q3. Not Q2.

And then in terms of comments about November, I’m really leery to make those because of the tremendous variability that you see week-to-week and so I can’t get myself to the point of being able to saying. We see some days going up and some days going down.

There’s a shift.

John, can I maybe jump in. We’re finding it’s difficult to read November from a comp perspective versus last year and even translating to December. Because of the shift of Thanksgiving into the last week or five days later in November, we shifted our holiday two floor set that set this week out by corresponding week as well. We just didn’t want to set the floor set another week out pre-Black Friday and because we shifted the floor set out a week, we shifted the corresponding marketing out a week as well. So we’ve gone through a week or so of non-comp from a calendar perspective, non-comp from a floor set perspective and non-comp from a marketing perspective. So it’s not easy for us to translate the last week or so of November into our true run rate. We’re doing a whole lot of stuff to figure that out, but there’s a lot of variability that we’re seeing.

This concludes today’s question-and-answer session. It’s now my pleasure to turn the program back to Chuck Crovita.

Thank you everyone for joining us today and thanks for your interest in our company. Have a great day.

This does conclude today’s conference. You may disconnect at any time.