Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to Photronics First Quarter and Fiscal Year 2020 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participant lines are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded Wednesday, March 4, 2020. I would now like to turn the conference over to Troy Dewar, Vice President of Investor Relations.

Thank you, Sarah. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to our review of Photronics' 2020 first quarter financial results. Joining me this morning are Peter Kirlin, our CEO; John Jordan, our CFO; and Chris Progler, our CTO. The press release we issued earlier this morning, along with the presentation material which accompanies our remarks, are available on the Investor Relations section of our webpage. Comments made by any participants on today's call may include forward-looking statements that include such words as anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, forecast, and our view. These forward-looking statements are based upon a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors that are difficult to predict. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking information. Before I turn the call over to Peter, I'm pleased to announce Photronics will host an Investor Day May 29, 2020 in New York City. More details will be coming soon. At this time, I will turn the call over to Peter.

Thank you, Troy, and good morning, everyone. We performed well in the first quarter, as solid design activity and our leading market position enables us to deliver sequential growth in a quarter that is typically seasonally weaker. Design activity remained high during the quarter, and revenue from our new China operations increased. Not only did we improved revenues compared with our previous quarter and the same quarter last year, but we achieved a record quarterly revenue for the second consecutive quarter, while delivering our tenth consecutive quarter of year-over-year revenue growth. Our technology portfolio, global operations, and market position enabled us to extend our streak of year-over-year revenue growth, further validating the value of our investment strategy. Moving down the income statement, operating income relative to Q4 was negatively impacted by ramping compensation expenses, as it is several adjustments below the line and our earnings for the quarter were $0.16 per share. Cash flow from operations was good, and our cash balance increased during the quarter to $218 million. We are well positioned as we prepare for our next waves of investment, targeting the FPD market. Before moving on, I would like to offer a few comments on the coronavirus. Obviously, our priority has been to take measures to protect the safety and health of our employees, while maintaining the business. Our sites in China, Taiwan, and Korea have implemented policies to keep our employees safe while complying with all governmental regulations. We are actively managing our suppliers to minimize any impact to our operations. So far, we are moving along at our standard seven by 24 pace. Effectively, business as usual. As far as our customers are concerned, it is difficult to quantify the impact the virus is having on their operations, and the situation is very fluid. So…

Thank you, Peter. Good morning, everyone. Despite typical first quarter seasonal softness, we delivered record revenue this quarter, 2% better than the previous record last quarter, and 28% better than last year's first quarter. We continued to realize the benefits from our growth investment strategy that has allowed us to bring more capacity and capability to the market over the last year, especially in the important China market. Our performance during the first quarter of 2020 is a continuation of our strong 2019 results. Record FPD revenue was driven by demand for AMOLED and LTPS mobile displays, as well as G10.5 plus for large format TVs. Display technology remains a vital point of differentiation from many of our customers, and they rely upon us as a trusted partner to enable them to meet their specifications. The IC business achieved double-digit growth year-over-year, but decreased sequentially, in line with seasonal trends. Lower gross margin due to costs of ramping the China businesses and increased compensation costs resulted in an operating margin of 10.2%, somewhat lower that the strong 13.7% margin in Q4. First quarter results included $2.9 million operating loss in China, although we point out that our Hefei facility operated at a profit in the quarter. Other income of $3.7 million resulted from a foreign exchange gain from re-measurement of U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities of the ports of our foreign subsidiaries, offset somewhat by increased interest expense in China. The tax provision of $9.1 million resulted from the jurisdictional mix of profits and losses anticipated for the fiscal year together with tax holidays and investment credits in certain foreign jurisdictions, and valuation allowances in a number of jurisdictions. The net income attributable to Photronics Inc. shareholders was $10.3 million or $0.16 per diluted share. Cash flow generation was…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Tom Diffely with D.A. Davidson. Your line is now open.

Yes, good morning. First, just a quick question on the coronavirus. Is there any way you can quantify how much of the impact on your first quarter or second quarter guide was? It sounds like some the text that both the IC and the flat tunnel businesses are pretty safe, and stable to strong right now. So, I'm curious, how much of a haircut are you taking?

Normally, if you look at our business, seasonally, we would guide up, flat up, in the second quarter. So, we have $10 million plus of downdraft baked into the midpoint of our guidance for the impact of the coronavirus on our business.

Okay, that's very helpful. And then when you look at what's driving that impact, it's my impression that most of your key components come from outside of China. So, I wouldn't think that supply would be the big issue. Is it just the uncertainty of the customers at this point? The fact that a lot of turns business during the quarter?

Sitting right in our shoes, we have four key constituencies to manage as we go through the trajectory of this particular event. We have suppliers, we have our employees, we have our customers, and of course, we have our shareholders. So, there's four communities that we need to take care of. As far as our employees go, we continue to operate, we always do, through Chinese New Year's. The regulations in different places have evolved. Our employees, as they walk through the front door of our facilities, get their temperature taken, and they're provided with masks, and we've isolated critical groups in our facilities so that if someone ends up sick, we don't end up with a key group that would otherwise be decimated. So far, it's operations as normal with some wrinkles. As far as the suppliers are concerned, particularly from regions we view as unreliable, we've raised our inventory levels. So, our materials are all in good shape and we have more than enough to contain to run our factories. As far as the equipment goes, not every supplier is on the job supporting our tool set. Some of them are cowering. Having said that, we as a company do a lot of self-maintenance, and we've developed, in order to do that, centers of excellence and video technology to allow service engineers in one location to guide service actions in another. So, we have deployed those actions with the suppliers who can't seem to get up the chutzpah to show up when there is a major problem with one of the tools. And as I sit here right now, there is no single tool in our manufacturing network anywhere in the world that is down because a supplier cannot get to it to fix it because we're facing…

Okay. No, that's very helpful. And then finally, a long-term question. When we start to look out what a second phase in Hefei looks like for the Gen 10.5 facility, roughly what type of capital is that going to require? How long is it going to take to install? What do you think the payback period is?

For me, anyways, right, we were having a little conversation here amongst us before the call started. Three years ago, what we said to you guys was when Hefei has ramped FPD revenues would exceed $200 million. Right? And we'd expect that the number of the revenues in China would breached the $20 million a quarter level. Well, guess what? Right? You look in the slide, you will see that the revenues in China breached the $20 million level, and our FPD business is clipping along at almost to come in $10 million rate. Kind of remarkable that we're sitting here now three years later, and it's not exactly what we thought, but you know what? It's pretty darn close. And I'm very proud of all the work the team had to do to make that result happen. So, I would begin by answering your question by saying what we told you that we'd do three years ago, I think it's un-equivocatingly clear that we have done that. And we have a good head of steam up. And the next wave of investment in Hefei is going to be focused on the AMOLED market. We are in a very good position in mobile displays. China is likewise being very aggressive, and we will aspire to do the same thing. Again, as I said in my remarks, we're right now acting aggressively, working to get contracts with customers. And depending on how successful we are with that activity, it will moderate or govern in that investment we're willing to make. So, by the time we have the shareholders meeting in May, I think we'll be wrapped up with the business development effort with the customers. And at that time, we'll tell you exactly what the capital investment looks like.

Okay, well thank you, and good job in a tough environment.

Thank you.

Thanks, Tom.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Gus Richard with Northland Securities. Your line is now open.

Yes, thanks for taking the questions. Could you give me a little bit of color on the push out you see? Is that FPD, IC? Is it Wuhan? Is it Korea? Just any color you can provide.

So, it's both FPD and IC. In the case of our FPD business, we were, I think, very confident we'll be able to keep all our factories full. But what will happen during the quarter is we'll see a shift in business mix. And of course, that affects the top line, particularly G10.5, pushing how it affects our topline in FPD because of the value of a single reticle set. So, in FPD, factories will full, but the mix won't be ideal. In IC, we've seen business impacted in China, Taiwan, and Korea, all three. And we expect that through the quarter at least, there'll be less tape-outs in those three markets. We're seeing it actively right now. No effect outside of those three countries, but certainly an effect within all three of them. But as I said, what we see is most definitely baked into the guidance that we have given.

Got it. And then you mentioned the driver that had to be quarantined for 14 days after driving into Wuhan or Hubei province. Is the coronavirus impacting your cost? Is it adding to costs in any material way?

It's only -- so, a couple of comments. There is some good news. I've seen some of what you've written on the coronavirus deaths. It's not all gloom and doom. So, if we look in Xiamen within the last two weeks, at least up until last night when I went home, I haven't checked this morning, there has not been a single new case of the coronavirus diagnosed in Xiamen, and per se, in the past 14 days, there has been one. So, the actions of the government in China seem to, in locations we're operating anyways, be bearing fruit. So, looks to us tentatively like the situation in China is starting to improve, and we are sort of kind of seeing that with some of our customers at the present time too. But where it's affected? That's affected on the cost line. It's only really inefficiencies and repairing some of our tools, and it's really not material. So yes, not much of an effect. Just more aggravation, really. Operational aggravation.

Got it. And then the last one from me. Could you just give me a little color on qualification of the new IC fab [indiscernible] in China? Sort of where are you, and when do you expect that to start getting close to profitability?

Yes, so as we said, I think we shipped the first reticles out of there in July for the startup of the facility. So, we said nine months to 12 months, right? I think we're proceeding along that trajectory, more or less, as we expected. We ought to be seeing material revenue in the second half of the year, but we expect it to come on strong at the end of the year. Right? Kind of like the FPD factory did, revenue coming on at the end of the year. Maybe you're reaching full production with the installed toolset Q1 of next year. That's the path we're on so far. I think we don't see any reason to change our view of how quickly we're going to go.

Got it. Thanks. Excellent execution in what is a very challenging environment.

Yes. Well, like I said, I'm very proud of our team. We have a lot of new employees in China. But we have some old ones there, and the old ones that are there are very accustomed to managing adversity. And our new employees, with the leadership of the old -- I'm very pleased with how they have responded.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Patrick Ho with Stifel. Your line is now open.

Thank you very much. Peter, maybe first off, looking at the coronavirus situation, but on the other side of it, when things get back to normal. How do you feel in terms of the overall operations on a potential snapback that once the situation gets resolved, stuff starts getting pulled in, and the demand obviously starts picking up again? How is your ability to ramp up in that phase, particularly given that you do have two relatively new facilities? Both are still in the process of ramping. Obviously, Hefei is up and running right now. How do you feel about that scenario whenever it comes?

So, as I said, Hefei basically was for full capacity all quarter long. It's really, right, normal. Hefei is in a mode now that I would describe as normal. It's normal operations. It may not be quite as strong a tree yet as some of our other factories. But it's really -- with all the challenges the local team has had to face, it's being tested. As far as Xiamen is concerned, we're moving along the qualification ramp. And the speed at which Xiamen can respond to a snapback in the business is really going to be gated, in my mind, by the number of processes that we have qualified when that snapback takes place. Now, there will be some bumps in the road. I think you heard in my remarks and John's remarks that Hefei was profitable. But our gross margin this quarter wasn't what we expected it or hoped it would be, and the reason for that is we had qualification expenses. We had some material scrap. So, it's not at 100% quite yet, but progress, I think, is outstanding. So, if the snapback's in a quarter or two, I'm pretty confident we're going to be able to manage it with not a lot of problems. I think -- also, I would finally just say that you may recall that we've been kind of the FPD operation -- we built that as quick as humanly possible. The IC plant, our growth there was a little more gated, and it was -- one of the reasons we could gate it was there has been a lot of cross-qualification done between our Asian manufacturing network and our China customer base. So, even if there's some struggles in Xiamen, which I don't expect, but you never know, our Chinese customers are more broadly qualified across our manufacturing network in our IC business than any other geography in the globe. So, I think we'll know when we're there, and I hope that we're there sooner rather than later. But I think we're in good shape.

Great, thank you. Maybe as my follow-up question; you noted in your prepared remarks that the supply chain isn't impacted from China specifically. But you do procure supplies from a lot of other regions within Asia itself and there is some disruption there. How are you mitigating that issue in terms of both alternative suppliers, secondary suppliers? How are you handling and building the inventory I guess during this more challenging period?

The cross-qualification of suppliers is something that we do every day as a normal course of business activity. So, we're really not -- there is nothing extraordinary going on where you have a single point of failure and we have a fire drill. But what we have done is we have a strong balance sheet, and we've leveraged it to ensure that we have more than typical inventory levels where we think there is any threat of a potential disruption. That's what we have done. There is a -- we created a global team, and the team meets weekly. And I think we have a good grasp of all the critical materials that we need, and we have more than enough.

Great, thank you very much.

Thank you. We do have a follow-up question from the line of Tom Diffely with D.A. Davidson. Your line is now open.

Good morning. Just a quick follow-up here on the Xiamen ramp. So, how much of the business of Xiamen is going to be for new customers versus just replacing some business you had through your Taiwan facility into China? And then with the facility actually in China, does that eliminate all potential tariff impacts?

Well, Tom, this quarter, during Q1, we shipped $58.6 million of sales into China. In 2016, right, our entire year was in China, and equal our first quarter of 2019. So, we're almost at a $240 million run rate of shipments into China. Now, off the top my head, I can't quantify for you how much of that is new versus old, but the lion's share of it clearly is new over the last three years. Lines shared is new, and some of it is more with customers we already have, but the majority of it is, it is completely new business. So, that's the best way I can quantify it for you off the top of my head. We probably up $200 million on a run rate basis of incremental business in China relative to 2016.

Okay. And then, just on the same topic, any impacts that you've seen through HiSilicon, and then any tariff impacts you've seen?

Well, I think everybody knows that they're one of the largest customers of TSMC, right? And their product line is broadening pretty extensively, and it's broadening extensively because of the -- A., their own internal initiatives, but B., the trade war, if you want to use that vernacular, has accelerated their efforts to diversify their product line to support fully the domestic manufacturing base. So, this is kind of pulling all boats in both China and Taiwan, and to the extent that more of that happens, there is even more business, to the extent there is a slowdown. The sword cuts both ways. But long term, it's clearly a positive trend for us.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, there are no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call over to Peter Kirlin for closing comments.

Thank you for joining us this morning. We made a great start in 2020, and remain on track to hit our objectives this year. I look forward to updating you as we progress.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes the conference call for today. We thank you for your participation, and ask that you please disconnect your lines.