Greetings, and welcome to the Park Hotels & Resorts Third Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Ian Weissman, Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, operator, and welcome everyone to the Park Hotels & Resorts third quarter 2023 earnings call. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that many of the comments made today are considered forward-looking statements under federal securities laws. As described in our filings with the SEC, these statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause future results to differ from those expressed and we are not obligated to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements. Actual future performance, outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed forward-looking statements. Please refer to documents filed by Park with the SEC, specifically the most recent reports on Form 10-K and 10-Q, which identify important risk factors that could cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements. In addition on today's call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial information such as FFO and adjusted EBITDA. You can find this information together with reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure in yesterday's earnings release as well as in our 8-K filed with the SEC and the supplemental financial information available on our website at pkhotelsandresorts.com. Additionally unless otherwise stated, all operating results will be presented on a current basis and include all 41 consolidated hotels. In some instances, however, we will be discussing results on a comparable hotel basis with a comparable view excluding the two Hilton San Francisco hotels. This morning Tom Baltimore, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will provide an update on the status of our two San Francisco hotels, review Park's third quarter performance and near-term outlook, and highlight our strategic capital allocation initiatives. Sean Dell'Orto, our Chief Financial Officer will provide additional color on third quarter results and forward-looking guidance, as well as an update on our balance sheet and liquidity. Following our prepared remarks, we will open the call for questions. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Tom.

Thank you, Ian, and welcome, everyone. I'm very pleased to report another solid and productive quarter for Park with Q3 earnings exceeding expectations and tremendous progress being made against our capital allocation priorities, including entering the final stages of our transformative ROI projects at our Bonnet Creek and Casa Marina resorts and repurchasing 5.8 million shares worth $75 million during the third quarter. But let me first begin with an update on our two San Francisco Hilton hotels and the related non-recourse CMBS debt. Last week the trustee for the loan filed a lawsuit against the borrowers related to our ceasing debt payments since June and the court has appointed a receiver to take full control of the hotels. The receiver has completed an exclusive possession of the hotels, as well as all income generated from their operations, which is to be used solely to pay all operating expenses and to cover all operating losses. Any operating losses or additional funds required to operate the hotels will be addressed between the receiver and the trust team. As such Park no longer has any economic interest, benefits or burden in the hotel's operations. The receiver also has the power to market and sell the hotels during the receivership. However, if the hotels are not under contract by September 1, 2024, the receivership will conclude in a non-judicial foreclosure by the end of 2024. Now let me be clear about what this means for Park and its shareholders. First, while in receivership and through its conclusion be it a stale or foreclosure, Park will no longer be obligated to fund any shortfalls for working capital or for payments on the loan. Second, we expect all operations at the hotels will remain intact. Hilton will continue to manage the hotels, which will continue…

Thanks Tom. Overall we are pleased with our third quarter performance. Q3 RevPAR for the portfolio was approximately $178, representing year-over-year growth of 3% driven primarily by occupancy gains of 2.5 percentage points above last year. Hotel revenue was $657 million during the quarter while hotel adjusted EBITDA was $173 million, resulting in a 26.3% hotel adjusted EBITDA margin. Margins were natively impacted by a few factors including the renovation disruption at our Casa Marina resort which accounted for over a 60 basis point drag on portfolio performance. In addition to our two San Francisco Hilton Hotels which accounted for an additional 210 basis point drag on hotel adjusted EBITDA margins. Excluding all three properties from our results, hotel adjusted EBITDA margin would have exceeded 29% for the quarter or approximately 40 basis points above 2019 levels. Q3 adjusted EBITDA was $163 million and adjusted FFO per share was $0.51, both of which exceeded our expectations. Looking ahead to the fourth quarter, preliminary results in October looks strong with RevPAR growth on pace to be up 6% with results driven once again by Hawaii and our urban poor including New York City, Boston and Chicago. Overall preliminary comparable RevPAR for the month of October stands at $198 or 4% above 2019. Turning to the balance sheet. Our current liquidity is approximately $1.7 billion, including $726 million in cash. Net debt at the end of Q3 was $3.9 billion and net leverage on a trailing 12-month basis was six times. Excluding the two San Francisco Hilton Hotels from our portfolio, since Park has no further financial exposure with these assets, balance sheet metrics materially improved with net leverage decreasing by nearly a full turn to just under 5.2 times and interest coverage improving by over half a turn to 3.2 times.…

Absolutely. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is coming from the line of Floris van Dijkum with Compass Point. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, thanks guys.

Good morning, Floris.

Good morning. I think this welcome reports. I think sort of validating some of our beliefs here on you guys. Tom and maybe if you could comment a little bit, obviously, you've got some capital return plans already outlined for the rest of this year, but you're still sitting on a big pile of cash. Your balance sheet metrics are significantly better particularly if we look at 2024 EBITDA, I mean, we're looking at a floor handle in terms of leverage. Should the market expect more share buybacks and/or are you looking at acquisitions going forward as well now that you're in a better capital position?

Floris, it's a great question. I think the first thing is I want to just reiterate the point that you've made and I'll say it differently, we've eliminated the noise around San Francisco. I could not be prouder and I'd like to highlight Nancy Wu, our General Counsel; and Sean Dell'Orto and many of the men and women inside and outside counsel that have been working with us since June to really find the right outcome and I believe, we've done that. So, we are glad to be moving forward. There is a clear path forward and really positive tailwinds for Park, as we look forward. Look, we continue to trade at a significant discount to both NAV, as well as replacement costs. So, as we sort of look forward, you can find us really continuing to focus on operational excellence. These transformative renovations will continue to provide a tailwind for us. There's a strong growth profile as you think about Hawaii, New York City, Chicago having a record year next year in citywides, New Orleans having a record year, DC being strong. The Japanese traveler returning as we pointed out in Hawaii. And again, Hawaii had a record year last year. We're cautiously optimistic, we'll have another record year this year, but with still a tailwind as we sort of look out. So we'll continue to focus on selling noncore assets as well. Our top 25 assets account for about 90% of value in the portfolio. And we'll use those proceeds for share buybacks, ROI projects and reducing leverage. But again, we're in a much better position today at 5.2 times than we were before. And there's been a lot of great work done by this team and very, very proud and we are hopeful and expect that the narrative around Park changes that we don't have to answer question after question every day on San Francisco. That problem has been solved. We have no economic benefit or burden of San Francisco, the two subject assets moving forward. Over finished. We're moving forward.

That seems pretty clear. Maybe also, can you just talk a little bit about Hawaii relative to other resort markets and why you remain -- I mean you sort of talked about the fact that flight capacity and the Japanese tourists is returning to Hawaii, maybe why your portfolio is better position maybe than some of the other markets in Hawaii? And then also, your outlook on some of the markets that did really well during COVID that are softening now particularly South Florida. But when will that stabilize in your view? And how much of an impact will that be on your earnings going forward?

I think Hawaii sort of speaks for itself for us. If you think about, you've got inbound demand that's averaged approximately 9 million to 10 million visitors, about 55% to 65% of that comes out of the US historically, about 15% to 17% coming out of Japan and you're seeing international growth certainly improved, but it's historically been anchored by US and Japanese. There's been more flight capacity and certainly more domestic travel coming out of the US and that started a little bit in the pandemic and then afterwards. And it just continues in our particular resort there, Hilton Hawaiian Village, upper upscale, it's not ultra-luxury, it's got 60-plus years of history. So it's an icon, it's a landmark. And if you look over the last 30 years irrespective of where the yen was vis-à-vis the dollar, it's been consistent visitation. Interesting now, the Japanese have been away largely for the last three years. And as we cited, we're encouraged as we sort of look out with what ANA is doing obviously adding a third A380 aircraft between Tokyo and Honolulu in early December, again increasing capacity to 18,000 per week which again exceeds COVID. Delta again adding more capacity. And having the city-like environment irreplaceable beaches that you can't replicate and then again having international particularly the Japanese traveler who generally we were averaging about 150 high-end weddings there a year. I think we've been four to six, I think the last couple of years in kind of post-COVID. So, we see all of that being a tailwind. And we have an extraordinary team led by Debbie Bishop on the Hilton side who just continues to find the right mix of demand. So we are excited about what we believe to be the acceleration of Japanese visitation but even without that we certainly expect that you continue to see US and other visitors as well. And it's different than some of those ultra high-end luxury and given the size of it it's a unique positioning. And if you look at what happened with the revenge spend, I mean all of that is sort of moderated and a reversion back to the mean. We didn't get that sort of real acceleration. We were modest increases but now I think that lift off for us looks better. Now, we'll probably be low double digit here in the fourth quarter. But as we look out to 2024 and beyond we're very, very encouraged and particularly if the Japanese traveler continues to accelerate. They stay longer and spend more. So, we see that as another leg of growth for us in Hawaii as we look forward.

Thanks Tom. Appreciate it.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Smedes Rose with Citi. Please proceed with your question.

Hey Smedes

Hi. Congrats from San Francisco. I guess congrats. Great to have incremental color there. Going back to Bonnet Creek, it looks like kind of pre-pandemic the Waldorf combined did kind of in the low to mid-$60 million range EBITDA. Fair to assume that you would expect to surpass that going forward? And maybe can you just talk about kind of where you think EBITDA can get at that property and kind of the timeline to get there?

Smedes this is Sean. I would say yes you're right on kind of pre-pandemic levels and it's been floating with that despite even some I would say disruption through the work we've been doing. So, I think as we think going forward clearly we expect increases to that level pre-pandemic level. We've added a tremendous amount of meeting space there. We've gotten tremendous amount of interest from groups to bring in there. We've upgraded the facility a good bit. We were actually down with our Board last week touring them around the site. It looks fantastic. Our D&C team has done an incredible job building out the extra meeting space and really the design team did a fantastic job upgrading the wall of our side. So we certainly expect the team to sort of moved forward with a great product and generate additional far more group business there going from about 50%, I would say to about 60% group in the house. And ultimately, we made a significant investment there. We expect to return. So, I won't necessarily guide specific numbers there but you would imagine that you're spending $200 million there. You're getting a good return on that and increase net EBITDA by I would say a good double-digit growth.

Smedes the other thing that I would comment on Bonnet by adding the additional capacity 137,000 square feet of meeting space plus or minus we have the ability now to manage multiple groups. So, it's a 1,000-room Hilton. It's a 500-room Waldorf. It's a championship golf course. We've got all of the amenities to top restaurants that are on site and it's a complete renovation public space freshened up obviously the guestrooms expanded the meeting both the new ballroom adjacent to the Waldorf. Again a large a ballroom a 100,000 square foot ballroom plus or minus over Waldorf I might add which is quite a marvel and quite a site it is extraordinary. And you think about the upside that we have there, we are very confident. We're trading at $200 a key plus or minus. I think that Four Seasons traded at $1.3 million a key in its next door and it's fabulous all of that it's not six times better. So we are very confident on the upside here and are very bullish as we look forward. And as Sean, gave you we're already seeing a booking pace far ahead of anything that we have seen historically. So we think there'll be real tailwinds because of the optionality to be able to house multiple group and it's 350 acres plus or minus. So, very bullish on that as we move forward see that again another part of the Park growth story and changing the narrative as we move forward.

Can I ask you Tom to just on Hawaii? It sounds like a positive there and you have a lot of confidence going forward. Any thoughts on moving forward with the new tower there that's kind of comment before on some of your calls?

Yes. We continue. Tom Morey, our Chief Investment Officer and his team are doing an extraordinary job working through the final entitlements there. We are excited about adding another 550 keys plus or minus. And keep in mind, when you look at Hilton Hawaiian Village, it's still running over 90% occupancy for a hotel with 2,900 rooms. So we think clearly it will be absorbed and are excited and continue to add another elevated product to the campus here. It's also worth noting that we -- the Hilton, Waikoloa, again, we shrunk that as part of the spin half of that went to HCV and timeshare but we're more profitable today as a 600-room hotel than we were as a 1,200-room hotel. We also have the ability to add approximately 180 to 200 keys there as well. So when we look out to Hawaii and that being 35% plus or minus of current EBITDA, we see growth not only in Oahu but also on the Big Island as well. So again part of the growth story for Park as we move forward.

Thanks for the time.

Great. Thanks.

Our next question is coming from the line of Duane Pfennigwerth with Evercore ISI. Please proceed with your question.

Hey. Good morning.

Hey, Duane.

Maybe just to zoom out a little bit kind of across the portfolio all the renovation and ROI work you were doing this year and displacement that you absorbed this year. Sort of how would you quantify that in total? And what would the tailwind across the portfolio be in 2024?

I think just from a disruption standpoint when you think about Casa and I'd say Orlando in the Bonnet Creek resort, we've outlined in our guidance in the earnings release about $15 million just specific to cost itself. We talked in the script about a few more million bucks that we think is disruptive to Orlando more so, not only we're giving rebates to customers with the noise everything going on with doing the rooms but I think just business staying away. So, we think you can easily think that upwards of running up to $20 million or so of disruption in the portfolio as we kind of think about an add back for next year. I think clearly, we've got the backdrop again. I don't want to get too ahead of ourselves and we got into the budgeting process, but we certainly have an expectation of driving those great renovations forward and realizing the returns we had on it. But like I said, we probably would expect start seeing us ramp towards that double-digit growth on that investment we've made which we've outlined for folks on those assets.

Thanks. And not to ask another Hawaii question but my guess is you're going to get more of them going forward. Can you just walk through the trends you've seen since the tragic wildfires in Maui? Do you think you picked up some benefits from Maui kind of book away? So was there a surge which is now settling down? Like how would you characterize booking patterns into fourth quarter and early next year?

I wouldn't say, we -- trill in Hawaiian Village, I wouldn't say we saw anything dramatic. I mean more so, because we couldn't really take a dislocation. We were 97% occupied. So while there are a hundred groups looking for hundreds of rooms we supply what we could there. We did pick up a couple of groups that relocated from Maui to the Big Island, which helped for Q4 about $1 million for group. And I'd say it wouldn't be dramatic across our two assets combined seeing that I think we continue to see just strong organic growth into those markets that I wouldn't necessarily say, it's because people are opting to go there besides Maui. And I think the other thing kind of talking about Hawaii is you go into next year too is while we don't talk a lot about Hawaiian Village as a group box. It's about traditionally about 20% group. It's about 40%, 45% up next year in pace. So again, another demand driver for that complex that we think certainly is another positive tailwind for next year. And I'd also say, we have parts of that towers that are from the timeshare business. And having that kind of the marketing channels that they come through and bring people in as well as the stickiness of their owners that come through and just another way, if we generate revenue demand into that complex.

Thanks, Sean.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Dany Asad with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Good morning, everybody. Good morning, Tom. So with San Francisco coming out of the portfolio now it just looks like we're looking at a portfolio, it's a lot more stabilized today. So, I don't know how much color you can give yet but any early read on how much RevPAR growth we would need to get operating leverage on the core portfolio that's kind of left in 2024?

Yes. Dany again looking ahead we don't want to get ourselves kind of speaking to any kind of guidance for next year at this point. We're getting to the budgeting process. But I agree, you're starting to see these things stabilize the expenses stabilize. If you look at the last couple of quarters, you've seen expenses that really have ranged in the 3% to 4% range year-over-year. So as that kind of really just works itself through, I think clearly you can kind of assume that we're going to be working hard with our operators to make sure that we are getting that operating leverage. We are matching any potential growth the growth of any kind of needs on the cost side with rate as well as other revenue generation ideas to make sure that we're continuing to kind of improve our margins. I think we've done an incredible job. Our asset management team done an incredible job of holding the line, in terms of the positions, we've taken out we've talked about extensively. And I think, we certainly feel like, we've done a really good job of holding down that count still down 19% in staffing and realized, if you were to kind of hold flat 19% levels of wages. I think there's about $150 million of savings when you look -- and that compares against the $85 million we've discussed in the past. So again, there's still some occupancy to get at with the portfolio and that will a little bit of cost that comes up. But I think, we're in that zone where you're north of 70% occupancy trying to get to 80%, and that's I think a pretty profitable set of a pretty profitable range to be in when you start building an occupy back and just dealing with a little bit of variability in terms of the expense add. So I think we feel pretty good. I mean, I think HHV talking about Hawaii again is a great case study where occupancy is certainly within the ZIP Code where to have 19% rates up well but it's not above inflationary rates on selling our margin is up over 200 basis points. So I think again that speaks to the work that's been done in the portfolio to manage the cost side.

The other side of that Dany, I would add is, when you think about our growth profile another way to help mitigate obviously the impact of those rising expenses. And to Sean's point I think we've done as well as anybody in the sector at keeping those costs down a lot of credit to our asset management team. But when you've got a backdrop of strong demand and growth in Hawaii looking out, New York City again up 30% and given some of the constraints down New York City again having the second best month in history there. And with the restrictions on, on short-term rentals with supply coming out New York looks very different. Chicago going to have a record year next year on the convention front. New Orleans having a near record year, Boston, San Diego, D.C. being strong. So given the diversified portfolio we have obviously anchored obviously in resorts and leisure, but certainly very strong on the group side as well. And as business transient continues to recover none of us know ultimately where that's going to set up, I like our positioning as we look to 2024 and beyond.

Very helpful. Thank you for that. And then in the prepared remarks we talked about we're back to pre-COVID target levels for dividend payouts. It looks like Casa Marina and Bonnet Creek are looking for year-end completion. So look beyond that how should we think about just the mix of capital allocation ROI projects, capital needs, going forward afterwards?

We've historically been in that say $200-plus million range obviously pre-pandemic. You'll see this ramp that up a little as we continue to take advantage of these strategic ROI projects. And as Sean noted, you can expect obviously AFFO payout to be in that two-thirds. We're quite proud and we hope shareholders are pleased as well. And we're returning over $625 million in return of capital this year. Sizable, it's significant. And you can expect that the Park team is laser focused on continuing to create value for shareholders as we move forward.

Thank you very much.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Bill Crow with Raymond James. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, good morning, guys.

Good morning.

Couple of questions. First of all, it looks like your Chicago assets benefited to the tune of about $10 million from kind of property tax benefits and back to business payments. Was that in prior guidance? I don't recall discussing that last quarter.

No. Bill, it was not in prior guidance. I certainly don't know what the outcomes are going to be.

Okay. And then the second question is more philosophical in New Orleans. And I'm just wondering, you said that group up 11% next year which is terrific, but it's coming off of a really, really low base. And is that a market Tom that is facing more secular than cyclical challenges you think? And as we think about the West Coast markets is it one of those markets that's just kind of maybe losing something to the new markets the Austin and the Nashvilles and Miamis and whatnot.

It's a fair question Bill. Just a couple of points of clarification, based on what we see on room nights and citywides in New Orleans is about 450,000 in 2023 and looking at about 505,000 510,000 next year. So it's not as bad a base. I would say obviously, third quarter there were no citywide. So hence, the reason it was softer there. It's a complex market. You do have the Harris converting to Caesars. You have significant investment being done there, particularly around the water. You've got obviously the mall has a new owner adjacent to our complex there the convention center is putting in I think about $550 million in improvements. It's historically as you know been a strong leisure, it's been a strong convention market, its gap has always been in the corporate side. That certainly would help. But I'm more encouraged, it's pro growth, not labor is reasonably priced and it doesn't have the same challenges as we see in some of those other cities that I know you're referring to. So we're cautiously optimistic. And whether that's a long-term hold for us, we'll see, but we certainly don't see the secular challenges there that I think we're seeing in some of the other cities.

Yeah. Okay. Tom, I've been doing this for a while. I don't think I've ever said this but congratulations on the default. And with that I'm done.

Bill, I appreciate that. The team appreciates. As I said in our June prepared statement and then follow-up meetings, difficult but necessary and to get it to where it is today from June to early November was just working around the clock to get to the right outcome. And I think we got to the right outcome moving forward for Park, our shareholders and San Francisco will recover. It's just going to take many years and Park couldn't wait anymore and we couldn't afford to continue to carry those two hotels as you know.

Yeah. Thanks a lot. I appreciate it.

Thank you.

Thank you. The next question is coming from Dori Kesten with Wells Fargo. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, Dori.

Hey, guys. Can you do a full bridge on the old EBITDA guide to the new just addressing what you thought San Francisco EBITDA would be November December and then Chicago property tax that Bill just noted anything else?

So relative to the prior guidance we gave in August, we had thought at the San Francisco would pretty much be about breakeven. So I wouldn't say it's really an impact -- a notable impact as we think about updating for our guidance this go around. In terms of Chicago, we did not as I mentioned but we did not have that in our guidance. That was certainly a combination of an appeal that affected prior year 2022 as well as allowing us to catch up this year in our accruals for a property tax there. So that was to the tune of -- I think it was about $5 million versus prior year and then the rest was kind of catch-up I think Bill noted about $10 million total, which is about accurate.

Okay. And there was nothing else then? Sean Dell’Orto: No.

Okay. And then I know it's early for 2024, but just very broadly between business transient group and leisure, which do you think would be your strongest revenue growth engine next year? Sean Dell’Orto: I mean, certainly group for us. We like 18% pace right now. Again with some addition, I think we're about -- our mix is about 200 basis points less than it was in 2019. So I think again room for improvement. Leisure again just given the discussions around Hawaii remains strong on top of that Casa coming back and a lot of excitement from people who are looking to return back to the resort there. So hard to kind of really set it, I think they're all three going in the right direction for us.

Dori, I think it's one of the benefits of a diversified portfolio. So I would say we lean forward a little bit on the group through all the reasons that we've outlined, but leisure again given Orlando, given Key West, given Hawaii expect also to be strong and for business transient and urban to be recovering. So that certainly would lag a little bit and perhaps be a little slower. But I think that's one of the real benefits of the growth profile of Park as we move forward.

Okay. Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Ari Klein with BMO Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks and good morning. On the CapEx front, you noted the disruption headwinds this year. Is there anything notable for next year that we should be thinking about? And then one of your peers announced a broader CapEx program alongside of the brand. Obviously Park has many Hilton Hotels. Is something of that a potential in the future for you?

We are not in discussions with Hilton about any kind of broader CapEx program. Hilton is a great partner and we work closely with them. Those programs are show well and sound good. There's always complexity behind them and we are not in discussions with Hilton on that front. Regarding next wave of ROI projects, we look at our Royal Palm Resort in South Beach on the ocean front just fabulous real estate that's one that our design and construction team are beginning to spend additional time on as we move forward. Obviously, we are looking at another tower that will renovate Hilton Hawaiian Village. But I wouldn't say that there's anything material that's going to be very disruptive in the 2024 as we look out right now. We're very careful trying to minimize our disruption to really 100 basis points of RevPAR approximately. Sometimes that will be a little more, a little less. But we're very thoughtful about making sure that these strategic ROI projects no doubt the investments that we've made and that have been communicated are going to provide great tailwinds for us as we move forward, but we're going to be continuing to reinvest where we make the money. And certainly Hawaii is a great example as we look out for some of those bigger projects. We're also looking at expanding our resort, our property in Santa Barbara adding additional keys there. So the embedded ROI opportunities within the portfolio over the next several years are significant and we're pretty excited about that.

Thanks. And just maybe following up on Hawaii. You noted the Japan, the Japan seats capacity picking up pretty meaningfully going forward. Are you seeing that translate into bookings yet?

Again as we said for fourth quarter we're looking at Hawaii being, kind of, low double-digit. So the answer is we are encouraged and yes optimistic and as a team there also works with some of the tour operators and as the Japanese traveler comes back very exciting. That will be again another tailwind for Hawaii as we look out.

Appreciate it. And I'll echo the congrats on the deal.

Great. Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Anthony Powell with Barclays. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Good morning.

Hi, Anthony.

Hi, Tom. Question on New York. In a few I guess reach with a lot of exposure there which is sort of positive here. That property did about $50 million of EBITDA pre-pandemic margins in the mid-teens. Shouldn't you be able to exceed that now given the structural changes in that market? And are there any more cost savings you can maybe get out of that property?

Yes, it's a great question Anthony. I will tell you we are think back to the pandemic and how the pundits thought, right? New York would either never come back or it would be 2026, 2027, 2028 we'll largely be back to pre-pandemic this year in 2023. We're up 30% in the third quarter. I think the October forecast plus or minus is probably in the 12% to 15% range. Looking at a solid fourth quarter and we're looking at a significant increase for the year, but we had 44 sellout nights in the third quarter four times what we had last year. And I think in 2019 it was around 60 plus or minus. So we're very encouraged. I think, as I said earlier, Sean may have had in his prepared remarks about October revenue of about $32 million, which is about $2 million south of the all-time high which I think was in May of 2018. And then when you look at supply contracting you look at short-term rental regulations again causing about an 80% reduction I think in Airbnb from 23,000 down to 3,000 units. New York looks very different. Now again we only own one asset there in that market. But we are very encouraged as we look out. Group pace is for 2024 is about 109% I believe of 2019 levels. So New York is -- and given that asset you've only got three big assets that can handle group business. We're cautiously optimistic and we do think there's an opportunity to continue to retool it and continue to improve efficiencies. So our outlook there is encouraging.

Thanks. And maybe just on asset sales. There have been a few deals in Boston San Francisco and some other markets. Are you marketing properties? And then what's your view on dispositions for this year and next?

Yes. We've closed on one sale. Obviously, we're not a desperate seller. We're going to remain disciplined on our pricing expectations. And with that backdrop we continue to focus on selling non-core, but we'll be disciplined about it. Those transactions under $100 million are easier to certainly execute, but again our Chief Investment Officer, Tom Morey and his talented team are working hard and we're confident we'll put some points on the board here if have not done by the end of this year certainly into early next year. But you'll continue to see us with the same playbook continuing to reshape the portfolio. Listeners may forget now but we have sold and disposed including San Francisco now 42 assets for about $2.7 billion and that's including international laundry facilities. We have cleaned up and reshaped this portfolio significantly since the spin. And really proud of the team and the great work that's been done.

All right. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Jay Kornreich with Wedbush. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Good morning.

Good morning.

Good morning. Just going back to capital allocation for a moment. You talked a lot about internal growth story and ROI. I guess from an external growth story it's been a while since you had made an acquisition and now with the removal of the San Francisco assets maybe there's a desire to smooth out the demand profile and look a little bit away from Hawaii is a fantastic market. Can you just provide any comments as to your ability and desire to acquire at this stage? And maybe what you'd be looking for if so?

The ability and desire would be high. I think the question is sort of at the right price in the right time. At this point given where we're trading at these huge discount obviously, to both replacement cost and NAV. The best capital allocation decision would be selling non-core assets and buying back our stock or reinvesting in our portfolio. Having said that, we are actively looking. You'll see us certainly we too there pockets and geographies, where we're less represented. Clearly Nashville is a market of Florida adding more in Miami area would certainly for Lauderdale I would certainly be of interest to us. Phoenix is an area in Scottsdale that we certainly would be open to Austin probably not in the near term given what's happening with the convention center and the work that's being done but that's certainly on our list as well. So Sunbelt remains high but I think that area is also moderating. It's had a quite a run up. And obviously, with that reversion back to the mean. I think hopefully, that will give the opportunity for better pricing. But no doubt we are in this to grow the business. And our deal team continues to underwrite, participate and we have the capacity to do something if something is priced right in the right situation.

Thanks. Appreciate that commentary. And then I guess just as a follow-up. Now that leverage is coming down to low around 5.2 times as you mentioned, is that a level you're comfortable with? Or do you have your eyes set on a specific range or number you'd like to get that leverage to?

As we said from the spin, we were always in that three to five times. Obviously, we had to go over that obviously, given the pandemic of what happened. But getting certainly in the four times is certainly a target for us. But we feel a whole lot better. And we certainly think the narrative should change and will change with the recent actions and where we are now in the low five times for net debt to EBITDA. And given the – the outlook as we see growth in EBITDA next year and beyond as we move forward.

Got it. Okay. Well, that’s it for me. Thanks very much.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Chris Woronka with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, Chris.

Hey, how are you? Congratulations on a lot of good stuff that happened this past quarter. Appreciate the comment. I wanted to kind of drill down on group rates a little bit if we could. I mean people focus on leisure, resort, pricing and how that are mobilized. I think we're to see that it's not the end of the world on groups, where do you think you are on groups of being able to – willing to absorb higher price [indiscernible] before in 2021 2022 and before. I mean are you more optimistic about what group pricing looks like for 2025, 2026, 2027. Just trying to get a broad sense as to how much more momentum might be there.

Yes. Let me – you were breaking up a little bit Chris but I think I got the gist of your question about. So if you look at group, if you look at 2024 as an example, and I'll just give ranges, your room nights probably in that 85% to 90% range of 2019. But if you look at rate it's probably in the 105% to 110% approximately of 2019. So rate is strong and we're not seeing any hesitation. And look in this sort of hybrid world where things are evolving and the importance of group, people are willing to spend more, whether that's for meetings or celebrations incentives and getting the need to bring their people together. So we're not seeing hesitation. If anything we see that is another lines of business and certainly better flow-through and better utilization of our properties. So and given the fact that you – when was the last time you saw a group a large group hotel get constructed, not happening very often. We also see that as a real benefit for the Park portfolio as we move forward.

Great. Very helpful. Thanks.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Chris Darling with Green Street. Please proceed with your question. Q – Chris Darling: Hi, everyone.

Hi, Chris. Tom ,can you dig into business transient demand, how that's trended as we move past Labor Day? And then what's your sense of what's happening with the larger corporations? Have you seen any positive momentum in that regard?

Chris, this is Sean. I mean I would think we have seen better-than-expected results coming out of Labor Day. I think again, some of the key components of business transient being corporate negotiated ultimately, outperformed expectations coming in Q3 and I think we'll continue to do that as we get into kind of early stages of Q4. That said, I would think we're still kind of looking to see that corporate negotiated subsegment that's dominated by those bigger businesses and bigger corporate, come back certainly 20% to 30% down relative to 2019. Part of that now is I think understanding, if it's just more of a focus now by our operators to just go after some of the smaller businesses, that they wouldn't really pay attention to this. They just lived off of the larger groups and now they're finding better balance. And so, we're trying to read through that to understand okay, is this kind of really just permanent secular kind of shift of this type of demand? Or is this more of a strategic move to kind of balance out those segments. So, I think in the end we're still seeing good travel going and ultimately I think we see it through the rest of the quarter as well. Q – Chris Darling: Okay. That's very helpful. And then maybe switching gears. Just curious, what's the appetite to use seller financing to effectuate any incremental asset sales?

Look, it's not ideal, but in the right situation we'd certainly be open to it. Look there's plenty of debt capital out there. Could be a little pricey. Obviously, the banks are going to probably have more regulatory pressure on them. But if you look at the private credit market, it's continues to accelerate and grow and we don't expect that's going to change. We haven't had any problem of getting deals done and our buyers have been able to find certainly, that were necessary and most have the ability to be able to over equitize if necessary. But it's a fair point, particularly, if we were going to try to move a larger asset. But even the recent deal that got done in Boston, you find the right buyer who has that capacity. They certainly have the ability to take it down all cash or put more equity and if necessary.

Thank you, Chris Q – Chris Darling: I appreciate the time. Thank you.

Thank you. We have no further questions, at this time. So I'd like to pass the floor back over to Tom Baltimore for closing remarks.

Well, thank you all for taking time today. And I hope that we can changed the narrative regarding Park. We are excited to have the noise of San Francisco behind us. We're excited about the future. There is a strong growth profile for Park, as we move forward and look forward to seeing many of you, if not all of you out in Maui.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's teleconference. We thank you for your participation and you may disconnect your lines at this time.