Good morning, and welcome to the Piper Jaffray Companies' Conference Call to discuss the Financial Results for the First Quarter of 2019. During the question-and-answer session, securities industry professionals may ask questions of management. The company has asked that I remind you that the statements on this call that are not historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated are identified in the company's earnings release and reports on file with the SEC, which are available on the company's website at www.piperjaffray.com and on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. This call will also include statements regarding certain non-GAAP financial measures. The non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to and not a substitute for measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Please refer to the company's earnings release issued today for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measure. The earnings release is available on the Investor Relations page of the company's website or at the SEC website. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. And now, I'd like to turn the call over to Mr. Chad Abraham. Mr. Abraham, you may begin your call.

Good morning, everyone. I'm here with Deb Schoneman, our President and Tim Carter, our CFO and we would like to thank you for joining the call to discuss Piper Jaffray's results for the first quarter of 2019. Despite a slow start to equity and debt capital raising, our advisory business performed well and we generated 191 million of adjusted net revenues, one of our strongest starts to a year on record. Adjusted pre-tax income was up meaningfully year-over-year, driven by increased revenues combined with disciplined expense management. Our strategies to drive shareholder value remain consistent as we begin 2019. We are focused on driving revenues higher through market share gains and continued sector, geographic and product expansion. Revenue growth, combined with enhanced scale and operating discipline, will expand margins and increase profitability. We were excited to announce the signing of a definitive agreement for the acquisition of Weeden & Co during the first quarter. The combination of Weeden's highly ranked agency execution platform, and Piper Jaffray's strong research platform builds a market leading middle market equities business. When closed, we believe the transaction will enhance the scale of our equity, sales and trading business, elevate our relevance with clients and add resilience across market cycles. Deb will provide more details on the transaction in her remarks. I'll first provide an update on our advisory and equity capital markets businesses, before handing the call over to Deb to discuss the rest of our business lines. Tim will follow with a review of the financials and an update on capital use. We will then open up the call for questions. Advisory revenues of 115 million, representing 60% of our quarterly revenues, drove our strong results for the quarter. Despite the length of the economic expansionary cycle, activity in US middle market M&A,…

Thanks, Chad. The first quarter saw a reversal from the 2018 fourth quarter sell off as both equity and fixed income securities rallied. Equity market indices were up 12% to 15% sequentially, yet volatility and volumes were relatively subdued. In the fixed income markets, the yield curve briefly inverted during the quarter and end of the quarter flat. Our equity brokerage business generated revenues of 16 million for the quarter, down year-over-year. Our core equity secondary trading revenues were down approximately 5%, driven by lower volumes. Additionally, in the year ago period, we generated higher black trading revenues, which can be more variable from quarter-to-quarter. We expect revenues to increase from these levels, as we move further into the year, as there's some seasonality to this business, as research checks tend to increase as the year progresses. As Chad mentioned, we announced the signing of a definitive agreement for the acquisition of Weeden & Co. during the first quarter. The transaction is expected to close early in the third quarter and we are on plan with our integration. Client reaction to the announcement has been extremely positive, as clients see the value proposition in combining our two firms. All key Weeden personnel have signed employment agreements to join the combined platform upon closing, and are already working collaboratively with us to ensure a seamless integration. We're excited by the affirmations from clients and employees on the cultural and strategic fit of the two strong franchises and the potential of our combined platform. Turning to our public finance and fixed income brokerage businesses, we generated 13 million of debt financing revenue in the quarter, up from the very slow year ago period, which was impacted by tax reform. Municipal underwriting volume started 2019 slower than we anticipated, which negatively impacted first…

Thanks, Deb. My comments will focus on our adjusted non-GAAP financial results. Our quarterly revenues were 191 million, up compared to the year ago period, driven by higher advisory revenues and improved performance in our fixed income business, offset by significantly lower equity capital markets activity. Revenues were down compared to the sequential quarter due to lower overall investment banking revenues. Our diluted EPS for the quarter was $1.57, up $0.19 per share on a year-over-year basis. The increase in EPS was driven by higher revenues and lower share count, partially offset by a lower tax benefit related to stock vestings. The most relevant comparison of our operating results is reflected in the 34% increase in pre-tax operating income compared to the first quarter of 2018. Operating margin of 14.7% expanded 220 basis points from the year ago period, driven by the operating leverage in our business. Turning to our operating expenses, the comp ratio for the quarter was within our target range of 62% to 63% and non-comp expenses were at the low end of our 43 million to 45 million per quarter range. We came in at the bottom end of our non-comp range, primarily due to lower deal related expenses, given the drop off in activity in our equity capital markets business. We will provide more guidance on the estimated impact to our comp ratio and non-comp expenses from the pending Weeden acquisition on the second quarter earnings call. Our adjusted tax rate for the quarter was 18%. The vesting of restricted stock grants often creates volatility in our first quarter tax rate. We recorded a $1.7 million tax benefit in Q1 related to restricted stock vesting at prices greater than the grant date price. Excluding this benefit, our adjusted tax rate was 24% for the quarter.…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Devin Ryan from JMP Securities.

Maybe first question here on some of the M&A activity in kind the advisory boutique space recently. We've seen a fair amount of deals announced recently, there's been several financial services focused firms and I know you guys have had some interest on kind of bulking up your financial services advisory capability. So I'm curious, if you've been looking at these transactions, and if seller expectations have - maybe increased or for some reason, they've been less interesting. And then just more broadly, expectations for potential roll up acquisitions, because you guys have done a number and done them well, recently.

Yeah. Thanks, Devin. Yeah, obviously, we've had a lot of success with Simmons and Edgeview and PCG and some of the industry teams and we're always active and looking, I do think the pace of certainly things we're seeing has picked up. I also think it's fair to say versus a couple of years ago, there's definitely more people looking. But what I would say is, it's not really just about competition, it's a lot about sort of the personal fit, the fit of the people, what we can do for their business, do they feel like they can get a uptick in revenue lift. So, we're certainly active and optimistic about the pipeline in that regard, but you never know how to predict which ones you're going to get done.

Got it. Okay. That's helpful. And maybe another one just on advisory. We just want to maybe parse through some of the commentary on the pipeline. So you had a nice start to the year obviously in revenues there. And here the comment about, the pipeline being more back end weighted, so I guess I'm just trying to think about does that imply maybe a little bit of a softer second quarter, with kind of a big back half, or is it that the back half is so strong that even with a good start to the year, could still get quite a bit better. I know it's a lumpy business, but just trying to kind of think about the - what's implied in that comment.

Yeah, I mean, this is always one of the toughest businesses to measure quarterly. Obviously, we had a spectacular Q1 in advisory, being up 50% year-over-year. That is certainly not the run rate we think we're on for the year, but we - and we definitely think Q2 will be down, from the advisory levels of Q1, but the pipelines are good. We have a very good backlog and yes, certainly expect a strong year for advisory.

Got it. Okay, great. Maybe shifting gears here a little bit. The fixed income brokerage business, I think came in quite a bit better than expectations out there and obviously was a better quarter than you've had in some time. So I heard the remarks around, there are some stronger client activity, but also sounds like some gains and positioning on inventory. So I'm just curious if we could maybe parse through that and just think about how much of the 24 was driven by kind of inventory marks and then whether really more should we just be thinking still about kind of where you guys had been in the range, kind of the mid to upper teen million dollars of fixed income brokerages kind of as a baseline, just to try to think about for our model.

Sure. I think we started looking at the quarter, it's always a little difficult to differentiate between what are really trading profits and customer activities when you're dealing with trading in spreads. Maybe the best way to characterize it is really twofold. One we saw increased customer activity and flow and at the same time, our traders did a really good job of getting in the middle of where that activity was. For example, you saw really positive fund flows in muni funds, which created a lot of activity in the market. And what I would say is maybe different from historically is we've really been doing that and generating those revenues without taking on additional risk, inventory status, very low levels as we spoke to, relative to where we were at year end, and overall markets were improved, which helps our performance. As we look out into Q2, again, it's always difficult to predict the markets, but we do expect some slowdown, just given this level of - a low level of interest rates and where the muni ratios are, and just looking at some of the trend we saw during the first quarter.

Got it. Okay, great. And then maybe one just on the equity capital market, equity underwriting, clearly, I think most firms were affected by the government shutdown and some of the aftershocks of the fourth quarter volatility. So just trying to think about kind of the trajectory of the pipeline there, and maybe kind of more broadly kind of a full year expectation if you can, just based on where you sit today, just how strong those pipelines are, and whether there's a fair amount of pent up activity that got pushed from the first quarter because of timing dynamics with the shutdown. And so that could kind of really boost the second quarter and beyond, just trying to think about some of the moving parts there.

Yeah. I think Devin, obviously, it was a very challenged ECM quarter for us, especially when you look versus last year, and it's definitely true. The government shutdown affected the first half of the quarter. I also think it's tough to measure market share on one month, but we certainly also didn't have a very robust March. And, that resulted in a tough ECM quarter. I do think our pipelines are much better. We're definitely seeing visibility, we absolutely expect to see ECM pick up in Q2 and the back half. Obviously, there's a lot of ground now to make up off of a soft Q1. But, the pipelines are good. And we definitely expect an improved run rate. We'll just have to see if we can get enough business done to make up for the gap in Q1.

Got it. Okay, great. And then last one here on capital, strong quarter of share repurchases. And I'm curious, whether that was kind of a reflection of the view on the stock or just as excess capital built, that was the most efficient way to return it and just trying to think about if there's any implications going forward. I know you have some cash needs for Weeden, but just trying to think about whether, at these prices, there's just more appetite for repurchases broadly, given your view of the stock.

Yeah, Devin, I'll take that. I think it is a combination. We do continue to generate a cash and capital and look for ways to deploy that. But certainly I think, in Q1, as we did in Q4 of last year, where the stock was at and where we were able to get things done, in Q1 we thought was attractive as well. So, we'll continue to evaluate that as we go forward. Again, we are also focused on just the liquidity and flow to the stock. So, we'll balance that, as well. But, you're right, we've been pretty active over the last couple of quarters. So that may moderate a little bit.

Yeah. And Devin, I think, Devin, I would just add to that, I think Tim said it well. I mean, we're not really changing the stance on stock buybacks. And when we look at it, very opportunistically in - just like in Q4, there were some chances when the stock was in the 60s, there were chances in the beginning of the quarter where it was very reasonable as well. And, you just look at that, and it's certainly one of the best tools. But we're definitely not on a plan to sort of buy stock every quarter, no matter what the price is. We look at that as a, like we look at all other sort of return situations.

Got it? Terrific. Well, thanks for taking all my questions, and congratulations on the nice start to the year and we'll talk soon.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Mike Grondahl from Northland Securities.

Yeah, congratulations on the M&A progress in the pipeline. My first question, really on the equity financing side, it sounds like the pipeline is pretty solid there and you're positioned for a better rest of the year. Can you talk a little bit about the pipeline mix, is - previously you'd called out energy and healthcare is always pretty strong, kind of the mix of that pipeline would be helpful.

Yeah, I think Mike, it's quite a bit like it has been the last few years, which is just heavily dominated by healthcare. We always look at sort of the market segments and specifically, market cap is under 2 billion, 3 billion, 4 billion, there's been times in the market where the - half of that entire fee pool is healthcare. And so, we expect that to continue and when the mix of ECM is heavy healthcare, that's certainly good for us. We do expect - we are obviously off to a slow start with energy, obviously, you've seen quite a big move in energy prices. I personally think that will lead to a better back half for ECM, energy and M&A for energy. So, I would say that would be another sector, I would call out as a good possibility. And then, we've been on several of these technology transactions, obviously, as a smaller player, but there's been quite a bit of volume. So, we expect that to continue this year as well.

Great. It sounds like you're adding 2 MDs in healthcare in 2Q. Should we expect or kind of plan for a couple more MDs the rest of the year in banking, or how should we think about that?

Yeah, I think, our goal is always, as we stated a few times, to try to add four to five, net MDs, and obviously, we're adding a - we're excited to talk about it on the next call a couple of healthcare MDs, it would certainly be our expectation that we could add a couple more net MDs, throughout the rest of the year, but we only have a few more months kind of to get that done. And you never know if we'll come to the right deal. But, we're certainly hopeful on that.

And then maybe one for Deb. Just what's your confidence level on sort of debt financing and debt trading for the rest of the year? '18 was really challenging. What kind, you're four months into the year, what kind of year you think '19 will be at a high level.

Yeah, we had talked about really coming into the year, looking at the overall volume and really speaking to the municipal market issuance being up 10% to 15%. I think that was really a view that was held pretty widely on the streets and I would say Q1 was lower than anticipated. So not sure yet exactly what that means for the total for the year. I would say what we're seeing is definite pickup in our pipeline and view that as being quite strong. So, maybe a little difficult to predict, but definitely issuance level is rebounding as we go through the year in part aided by these low interest rates.

We have no further questions in queue. I'll turn the call back to the presenters for closing remarks.

Okay, thanks, operator. We're very pleased with our start to 2019 and we look forward to updating you all again following the second quarter. Thanks, everybody. Have a great day.

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.