Welcome to the Impinj First Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Andy Cobb, Vice President, Strategic Finance. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us to discuss Impinj’s first quarter 2022 results. On today’s call, Chris Diorio, Impinj’s Co-Founder and CEO, will provide a brief overview of our market opportunity and performance. Cary Baker, Impinj’s CFO, will follow with a detailed review of our first quarter 2022 financial results and second quarter 2022 outlook. We will then open the call for questions. Jeff Dossett, Impinj’s CRO, will join us in the Q&A session. You can find management’s prepared remarks plus trended financial data on the Investor Relations section of the company’s website. We will make statements in this call about future expectations and financial performance based on our outlook as of today. Any such statements are forward-looking under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, while we believe we have a reasonable basis for making these forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially because any statements we make today are subject to risks and uncertainties. We describe these risks and uncertainties in the annual and quarterly reports we file with the SEC. We do not undertake and expressly disclaim any obligation to update or alter our forward-looking statements except as required by applicable law. On today’s call, all financial metrics except for revenue, or where we explicitly state otherwise are non-GAAP. Balance sheet and cash flow metrics are on a GAAP basis. Please refer to our earnings release for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial metrics to the most comparable GAAP metrics. Before turning to our results and outlook. Note that we will participate in the Oppenheimer Seventh Annual Emerging Growth Conference on May 10 and Baird’s Global Consumer, Technology and Services Conference in New York on June 7. We look forward to connecting with many of you at those events. I will now turn the call over to Chris.

Thank you, Andy, and thank you all for joining the call. Our first quarter results were strong. Revenue and profitability exceeded our guidance with revenue setting a new quarterly record. Bookings were also strong, further increasing our record backlog that now extends into 2023. Demand for our endpoint ICs, reader ICs, readers and gateways all showed extraordinary strength. At the same time, we remain supply-constrained, limiting both first quarter revenue and our ability to satisfy that extraordinary demand. As challenging as these constraints are today, our industry’s broad-based secular adoption, strong long-term unit volume CAGR and sustained demand from enterprises need for process digitization positions Impinj to benefit significantly when upside wafers become available. First quarter endpoint IC revenue exceeded our expectations, setting a new quarterly record. For retailers, the adoption drivers continue to be in-store inventory visibility and omnichannel fulfillment. And for both retailers and supply chain and logistics providers, supply chain visibility and process digitization. Retailers increased their apparel tagging, while also expanding into new categories like home goods, driving growth in our endpoint IC demand and backlog. For at least the next several quarters, we see retail expansion centered on apparel, home goods and general merchandise and supply chain expansion centered on parcel shipment traceability as key business drivers. Overall, we see multiyear growth tailwinds for our endpoint ICs. First quarter endpoint IC unit volume demand exceeded shipments by more than 50%, like it has for the past three quarters. Yet again, we believe our inlay partners would have layered on additional bookings if we had more wafers. Although we did secure modest upside wafers from our foundry partner, allowing us to commit second and third quarter shipment volumes that equal or exceed first quarter, our supply is still far short of demand. Until our foundry partner…

Thank you, Chris, and good afternoon, everyone. On today's call, I will review our first quarter financial results and second quarter financial outlook. First quarter revenue was $53.1 million, up 1% sequentially compared with $52.6 million in fourth quarter 2021 and up 17% year-over-year from $45.2 million in first quarter 2021. First quarter endpoint IC revenue was $38.8 million, up 1% sequentially compared with $38.4 million in fourth quarter 2021, and up 2% year-over-year from $38.1 million in first quarter 2021. Endpoint IC revenue exceeded our expectations driven by higher volumes and a slightly more favorable mix, a specialty and industrial endpoint ICs than we had anticipated. Looking forward, we expect a slight sequential increase in second quarter 2022 endpoint IC revenue. First quarter systems revenue was $14.3 million, up 1% sequentially compared with $14.2 million in fourth quarter 2021 and up 100% year-over-year from $7.2 million in first quarter 2021. Systems revenue exceeded our expectations, driven by stronger reader revenue than we had anticipated. On a sequential basis, reader revenue increased while gateway and reader IC revenue declined. On a year-over-year basis, reader IC, reader and gateway revenue all increased. We expect a modest sequential increase in second quarter 2022 systems revenue driven by reader IC revenue and initial gateway shipments into the new loss prevention deployment from a visionary European retailer. First quarter gross margin was 57% compared with 58.2% in fourth quarter 2021 and 50.3% in first quarter 2021. The sequential decrease was driven by a smaller contribution from both sales of fully reserved inventory and underlying product margins, partially offset by lower indirect costs. The year-over-year increase was driven by underlying product margins and product mix. In addition to the margin-rich specialty industrial endpoint ICs, a higher mix of Impinj M700 also provided a first quarter…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Toshiya Hari with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Hi, everyone. Good afternoon and thank you so much for taking the question and congrats on a very strong set of results. Chris, I wanted – I had two questions. First of all, on kind of the supply-demand environment, particularly in your endpoint IC business. I think you're supply constrained in your systems business as well. But if – your commentary correctly, I think you noted that by the end of the year, you'd expect supply to somewhat catch up to demand. I was hoping to get some color on the endpoint IC side. I realize it's hard to predict, but how significant is the delta between supply/demand today? And more importantly, when would you expect your foundry partner to be in a position to address what you need?

Okay. Thank you, Toshiya. Thank you for your kind words. As I noted in our prepared remarks, demand exceeds our ability to supply in more than 50%, and we're basically four quarters in that domain, this being the fourth quarter. We're doing everything we can to increase supply. And we know that our foundry partner is prioritizing for upside wafers. It just isn't enough. And we said that in our prepared remarks that we can deliver consistent wafer volumes in the second and third quarter. These situations, the supply-demand imbalances always ease as we know because the semiconductor industry goes through these cycles occasionally. I've never been in one as severe as this, but they go through these cycles. It's just very difficult for me to speculate when. So I prefer not to speculate out to fourth quarter or beyond, just to say that we're working very closely with our foundry partner to get upside wafer supply, and we are preparing ourselves as best we can so that when those upside wafers become available, our post processing is primed and ready to be able to handle them and to get ICs into our partners' hands as quickly as possible.

Got it. Thank you for that. And then a quick follow-up on gross margins, maybe for Cary. So the decline – well, first of all, thank you for providing guidance on gross margin, super helpful. So the sequential decline that you're guiding to in Q2, I guess, down from 57% in Q1 to 53.5% at the midpoint for Q2. Is that primarily specialty and industrial SKUs normalizing lower? Or did I miss something else that could potentially drive gross margins down on a sequential basis? And then, I guess, part two on gross margins, you mentioned medium to long term, you'd expect opportunity associated with 300-millimeter becoming a bigger percentage of your business. Can you help us quantify, what that upside could look like relative to the 53.5% guide for Q2 and Q3? Thank you.

Yes. Thanks, Toshiya. I appreciate the question. Yes, as you said, gross margin for Q2, we're expecting in a range of 53% to 54%. That is a step down from where we've been in recent quarters, which benefited from a strong mix of specialty and industrial SKUs. The other item that's impacting Q2 is we're really starting to see higher-cost wafers flow through our inventory and through our COGS right now. So we're starting to get close to where we expect to normalize based on our current supply mix. Two years ago, when we started talking about the M700 and the benefits that would have to gross margin, we were in roughly a 50% gross margin range. So these first two chips on the M700 family has really what's provided us with this 300 or so basis point improvement from what was our previous gross margin run rate. We're not done yet innovating on the M700 platform. And we expect to launch more chips that will drive more opportunity for us to drive gross margin accretion in the future.

Very helpful. Thank you so much.

Thank you, Toshiya.

The next question comes from Scott Searle with Roth Capital. Please go ahead.

Hey good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. It's like a positive Groundhog Day good results, but constrained by the wafer environment. Hey, maybe just quickly, to make sure I get a clarification. I want to make sure, I heard the numbers correctly, again, that 50% plus upside was limited again on the endpoint IC front. And from a gross margin standpoint, Cary, I wanted to make sure I understood this is the level that you're expecting to normalize as we go out further on to the time horizon as well. And I think you indicated on the wafer front, still wafer constrained in the third quarter. I'm wondering if that – as you given your current visibility, if that entails a step-up in the third quarter from the second quarter?

So I'll say a few words just about the wafer demand. So as we said in our prepared remarks, the demand exceeds supply by more than 50%. And our partners would have layered on additional bookings if we had more supply. And I used the word extraordinarily strong in my intro because the demand is very strong today. We see enterprises deploying in multiple verticals, expanding their deployments, new enterprises coming online. The demand is there, supply is short. Cary, would you like to take the second part?

Yes. So Scott, thanks for the question. As we noted, gross margin in Q2 will be in the 53% to 54% range. Based on our current supply mix, I anticipate a somewhat similar range in Q3, and really near-term movement from that dictated by – first by supply, and then second by mix of revenue between endpoint ICs and systems. So I think we're getting to a normalized rate right now. There will always be movement in our gross margins. And then looking forward, think of the M700 platform as it relates to gross margin as a multiyear growth path. What we’re seeing right now is the first step of the first two chips on the M700 platform. Again, we will – we’re continuing to work on it. This is part of the place we’re putting our engineering dollars. So, as we have more innovation to announce on that, we will do so, and then I’ll be able to talk more about our ambitions for gross margin accretion.

Perfect. Very helpful. And if I could, just to follow up on your post-processing comments. You guys have been investing in the back end, but you made some comments in terms of outbreaks. I’m wondering if you could provide a little bit more color or detail your comfort level in terms of where you are from a post-processing standpoint, both as we look into the near-term second, third quarter and kind of how you’re positioned as demand and supply equivalent come back in the balance. Thanks.

So yes, I need to differentiate in the reader ICs and our endpoint ICs. There was a post-processing outbreak at the testing house – I’m sorry, there was a post-processing outbreak at the supplier for our prior generation in the reader ICs. And so we were – that COVID outbreak limited the number of prior-generation Indy reader ICs we were able to get in the quarter. If I turn to the endpoint ICs, we continue to build our post-processing capacity I’ve said on prior calls straightening and widening the pipes, so that when upside wafers come and often time is to when you’re in these steep cycles, they come rapidly on the other side. When those wafers come, we’re ready to catch them and turn them quickly. Did I answer your question, okay?

Yes, it did. Perfect. Thank you so much.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Mike Walkley with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon guys. It’s Dan on for Mike. Thanks for taking my questions. So congrats on the strong Q1 execution despite the supply chain challenges. Just wondering if you could provide us with some color on your large projects pipeline. I know you mentioned you had a record backlog, but if you just think about how – if you could just let us know how to think about this or maybe even provide some extra details that would be great.

This is Jeff. Our pipeline – opportunity pipeline is and remains strong. Within our pipeline, large potential opportunities are increasing as a proportion of the total pipeline. Very encouraged by the interest of visionary and customers in retail and supply chain and logistics, in particular, as they look to optimize their operations to improve supply chain visibility and other process digitization that lays the foundation for optimizing business efficiencies and enabling them to better serve their customers. So, we’re seeing growth broadly, geographically and across key market segments and the use cases or needs of those customers in those segments.

And Dan, and I guess I want to add, this is Chris. As you think about the Visionary European retailer rolling out our RAIN-based loss prevention product broadly, I believe that that deployment is a bellwether for opportunities to come because as we can deploy loss prevention, the real reason to do loss prevention is so if you do self-checkout. Retailers are asking for self-checkout for a long period of time to improvement streamlined retail stores. And that self-checkout along with better inventory visibility. As I said in the prepared remarks, it’s really the vision for stores of the future. So there are huge opportunities in retail starting with retail apparel because that’s where the industry took out first. But expanding to all kinds of other retail items, home goods, as general merchandise. So, we’re in the early days of a transition – not a transition, an expansion from handheld-driven inventory counting primarily in retail to fixed reading opportunities in retail, supply chain and logistics broadly, aviation and other opportunities. And we believe that, that expansion into those fixed reading opportunities positions Impinj very well as a consequence of our platform and the investments we’ve made in our platform.

Well thank you for that. And just as a quick follow-up, could you just provide us with an update on some of the competitive dynamics you’re seeing? And any feel for market share gains given your M700 differentiation?

So this is Chris. I’ll take – in terms of market share gains, we look at the end of every year at the RAIN Alliance data. For 2021, the RAIN Alliance published a number of roughly 29 billion units delivered in that year, which is 30% – 36% – I’m sorry, 36% year-over-year growth. We believe we gained a few points of share in 2021. In terms of 2022, obviously, there is an ongoing competitive dynamic and we do our best to allocate our supply and work with our partners to be as competitive in the market as we possibly can be, but we don’t have good visibility in terms of the actual numbers of units until the end of the year with the RAIN Alliance, and we don’t actually speculate in terms of what those numbers are. So, we have hard numbers at the end of the year.

Great. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Harsh Kumar with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Hey guys, first of all, congratulations, solid results, solid guide. Chris and Cary, I had a question on the logistics comment, customer comment that you made. I believe you mentioned that you saw a ramp-up in readers associated with the second largest customer and expecting endpoint ICs to ramp up in 2023. I was curious if you could provide us with some color. Does this mean that, that customer is going into implementation in 2023? Or how should we look at that?

Yes. So Harsh, thank you for your kind words. And I’ll take a first cut at answering your question and then see if Jeff or Cary want to jump in. So, we did say that second large North American supply chain and logistics customers, advanced their reader deployment and contributed the largest quarterly revenue to date. So yes, they have continued to deploy at every stage in one of these fixed reading deployments. After you’ve deployed enough readers and the customer is ready, they begin to flip to switch over from getting the fixed infrastructure ready to consuming tag volumes. We expect – this is our expectation based on where they are, that, that switch flipping, will occur in 2023 and will generate significant endpoint IC opportunities. That’s an expectation on our part based on what we know about the deployment. The endpoint IC opportunities with that customer can be quite large. I prefer not to quantify anything here because, again, there’s certain timing in terms of the cutover and the pace at which they adopt – I’m sorry, the pace at which they really begin ramping up, not adopt, the pace at which they begin ramping. But our expectation is, given the scope of the deployment and the pace at which they are progressing, we do expect a significant opportunity in 2023.

Very helpful, Chris. I’m going to leave this topic, but I’m going to ask you for one small clarification on that. When somebody like that goes live with the so-called implementation, does that mean that they go 100% with all products that they are managing the logistics for? Or can they do in stages, i.e., certain geos and certain types of products versus others?

Thank you for the clarification. And it is an important point, Harsh. Thank you. In general, we do not see end customers going from 0% to 100% in one step. It’s just very difficult to happen. So, we see some large enterprises going category by category. We’ll take some scope – some categories of items or some categories of supply chain and logistics, special deliveries and start there. They’ll use that smaller set of items to test their proceeds, prove their operational efficiencies, basically do the upfront work to prove that everything is working. And then they expand from a first category into multiple categories. In other types of deployments, we'll see enterprises go geography by geography. And I'll use as an example, H&M one of the retailers that has been expanding country by country. So they roll out one country and then they move on to the next one. It is very rare to see a large enterprise do a cut over all at once because the risks in doing so, not just from the RAIN RFID perspective, but from their entire backend perspective, being ready for it, risks are just too high. But to get back to the first part of your question, what we see and feel from the second large North American supply chain and logistics customer is they are at the point where we believe next year, they will have the opportunity to do a significant turn on of the capacity they have already deployed. The reader capacity they've already deployed.

Great. Thanks guys. As a courtesy, I'll step back in line and let somebody else ask a question. Thank you.

Thank you, Harsh.

The next question comes from Troy Jensen with Lake Street Capital. Please go ahead.

Hey, gentlemen, I congrats on the great results. I guess I want to kind of piggyback on Harsh's comments here, this second big logistics customer. They reported in their 10-K that they transported 6.4 billion packages in 2021. So, assuming $0.01 per tag that equates to about a $64 million opportunity annually, when they're at a 100%, is you don't want quote numbers, but I guess, comments on that. And then is there any ratio on infrastructure spending that's needed to facilitate that? I guess I feel like we can quantify the size of the tag opportunity, but I'm a little uncertain on how to quantify the infrastructure side there?

Yes. So Troy, this is [indiscernible]. I'm going take a stab at your question first, in regards to the overall endpoint IC opportunity. We don't cite the name of any particular end customer. And in fact, we've mentioned two of the largest North American supply chain logistics customers are first in a second and other, significant retail opportunities. What I will say is that the size of the Fortune 500 or in many cases, Fortune 100 and customers that are deploying RAIN RFID today suggests that multi-billion unit opportunities per enterprise are not uncommon or set another way could actually be quite common. There are many entities that move or sell billions of units per year. And so the numbers you're thinking about in terms of the endpoint ICs can be quite large, especially as multiple of these enterprises move forward. Then in terms of the ratio of endpoint ICs to systems opportunity, the way we think about it is the endpoint IC opportunity is the recurring opportunity. The systems is what we need to deploy in order to make that recurring opportunity happen. So upfront we generate good systems revenue. As we said, for the visionary European retailer, three times as much revenue in the second deployment as the one they did last year, this is for the loss prevention and self checkout. And that's important to us and it's valuable to us and we continue investing in systems. But the real value in those systems deployments is to drive endpoint IC volumes and for our entire platform preference for Impinj endpoint ICs.

Perfect. Understood. I have just one follow-up for me? M700 as a percentage of tag sales, I think you exceeded the halfway mark a quarter or two ago. Any other color you can give us there? I'm just curious how much room you have here to expand the margin contribution rate from the M700?

Yes. Troy, this is Cary. I'll take a shot of that one. So, as you noted we ramped M700 as a percentage of our sales mix quite significantly last year. In third quarter, it became our volume runner. And in fourth quarter, it was the lion share of our sales mix. As I looked to 2022, growth from kind of where we are right now is limited by supply and our supply and a mix of the supply between 200 and 300 millimeter. So as, as you're doing that translation from M700 mix to gross margin, we provided some pretty good color this quarter on not only Q2, but where we think Q3 is going to be. And I think that's the right range to think about us until the supply index changes, which we will certainly make you aware of when that happens. And then as I noted before, as additional innovation on 300 millimeter endpoint IC occurs, and we can drive more opportunity for gross market accretion.

Perfect guys. So keep up to good work.

Thank you.

Thanks, Troy.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Chris Grenga with Needham & Company. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good afternoon. Thank you for taking the question. Real quickly on the retailers expanding into new categories. Is that are you seeing new logos in specialty retail categories or is that existing retailer customers that are expanding into new categories within the same customer?

Chris, we were primarily referring to existing retailers expanding into new categories, like or beyond retail apparel. And so we've seen some pretty significant expansion at existing enterprises into those new categories and multiple of those enterprises. That's not to say that there isn't ongoing acceleration and retail deployments. And in fact, new enterprises continue to adopt. But at least in the context of those comments, we're referring to expansion beyond retail apparel to other categories at retailers that were already deployed in retail apparel.

Terrific. Thanks. And just with respect to the system supply catching up with demand, what levers there do you have to ensure that or to give you visibility into catching that demand by the end of the year?

So that's a little bit more nuanced question to answer for our readers and gateways, which are finished boxes. We do have the ability to do redesign, circuit board redesign if there's difficult to get components. We do have the ability to kind of flex in terms of purchasing those components. And so unlike an IC where you are fabricating wafers with a foundry partner and you don't quickly move and in many cases, you have a long-term relationship with that foundry partner when you're building a systems component. You do have more flexibility in terms of component availability. So we look to that component availability. Things we can do from an engineering perspective to improve our supply, again, slight modifications, and other things like that. Buying parts in the open market, as well as enhancing our test capacity, for example, for our reader ICs, having our older generation Indy reader ICs, and our new generation of E-family ICs and flexing there. When you put all the pieces together, we feel that we will be able to significantly catch up to systems demand by the end of the year.

Great. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Chris.

This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Chris Diorio, Co-Founder and CEO for any closing remarks.

Thank you, operator. And I'd like to thank you all for joining the call today. I hope you and your loved ones are and remain safe and well. Thank you very much.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may not disconnect.