Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Krista and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to Pegasystems Inc. Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker’s remarks, there will be question and answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I will now like to turn the conference over to Peter Welburn, Vice President of Corporate Development, Investor Relations. You may begin.

Thank you so much, Krista. Good morning everyone and welcome to Pegasystems Q3 2024 earnings call. Before we begin, I would like to read our safe harbor statement. Certain statements contained in this presentation may be construed as forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, will, could, should, estimates, may, forecast guidance or variations of such words and other similar expressions identified forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made and are based on current expectations and assumptions. Because such statements deal with future events they’re subject to various risks and uncertainties, actual results for fiscal year 2024 and beyond could differ materially from the company's current expectations. Factors that could cause the company's results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements are contained in the company's press release announcing its Q3 2024 results, and in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, and in other recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, and there are no assurances that the matters contained in such statements will be achieved. Although subsequent events may cause our views to change, except as required by applicable law, we do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. And with that, I turn the call over to Alan Trefler, Founder and CEO of Pegasystems.

Thank you, Peter and thanks to all who are joining today's call. I'm really pleased with our performance for the first nine months of 2024. The team is executing extraordinarily well, and I'm optimistic about the momentum that's evident in our results. The energy is palpable across the company and our sales teams are fired up. It's great to see that we're driving profitable and balanced growth across industries and geographies, while delivering transformational innovation. The enormous excitement we're seeing from our AI offerings especially Pega GenAI Blueprint is fundamentally changing the way that we engage with prospects and clients. Our distinctive AI approach is showing clients how they can accelerate their digital transformation and move to become autonomous enterprises. Blueprint is now part of virtually every client and prospect discussion. It continues with spy of our prospects our clients and partners with possibilities and they're continuing to evolve. It has profoundly changed how we engage, sell, deliver and is helping us work to get in with clients more deeply and across bigger pieces of their business. The number of new blueprints continues to grow dramatically. It's helping us identify opportunities to accelerate growth and creating additional momentum for Pega Cloud, which is growing at a faster rate than even we predicted and Ken will discuss in more detail. The tremendous engagement from clients and partners is also accelerating innovation as together we're continuously discover new ways to leverage and to improve Blueprint. For example, we've recently added support from many additional languages and added a new collaboration feature that summarizes Blueprint is making changes to the blueprints to help our clients collaborate among themselves. As a reminder, you can experience Blueprint for free by going to pega.com and searching on Blueprint. But I think perhaps most importantly, this is…

Thanks, Alan. It's fantastic to see our team consistently deliver solid quarters of profitable growth, for the third time this year. Clearly, we have momentum, and we're executing very well. Annual contract value grew 14% in constant currency and 16% as reported year-over-year. Our ACV growth acceleration was powered by Pega Cloud, which grew 26% year-over-year in constant currency. Pega Cloud represents the vast majority of our net new ACV in the quarter, and for the year. Our team is selling Pega Cloud is our primary offering, which is a pretty significant change from our approach several years ago. Overall, our ACV growth acceleration in Q3 was powered by the successful execution of our strategy. As you may recall 2023, we shifted our go-to-market strategy to focus on our target organization model. By minimizing distractions and having our sales teams laser-focused on the right organizations we have greatly improved, sales efficiency and effectiveness. This change coupled with our latest GenAI innovation has enabled us to significantly increase client engagement. Pega GenAI Blueprint is having a profound impact on the way our sellers and partners engage with our clients and prospects around the world. It also enables us to expand our addressable market with existing and new clients by helping them to modernize legacy systems that were not in scope before, but are in scope now. Last week, for example, I attended Pega’s 7th Annual Government Empowered Conference in Washington D.C. It was great to see government agencies at the event like Social Security Administration, the Department of Justice, the IRS and Veterans Affairs, each agency is using Pega to build modern platforms that will allow them to deliver more effectively on their missions. With Pega GenAI Blueprint and our new FedRAMP high certification, Pega has never been in a better…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Steve Enders with Citi. Please go ahead.

Hi. Great. Thanks taking the questions this morning. I guess, maybe just to start I want to ask on the momentum that you're seeing with Blueprint and maybe what impact is that beginning to have on either ACV the acceleration we saw in ACV in the quarter or on the pipeline and what that looks like for Q4 and into 2025.

Yes. I think Blueprint has lifted all boats is the way I describe it. And I think it's done that because when clients see it and internalize allows them to think differently about their business. Even if we were already talking to them so they didn't get the advantages of Blueprint early in the sales cycle I think really helps convince them that Pega is an organization that they should count on and continue to grow with. We've also begun to show off another Blueprint that we are going to be releasing around the end of the year for our decisioning capabilities which are going to bring a lot of the same AI-powered analytics to helping our customers do next best action which as you know is a very, very important part of our business. So I think Blueprint is just changing the overall attitude and that has -- it sounds like I can tease apart the pieces that are related to Blueprint, because it is so incredibly pervasive just change the engagement.

Okay. Got you. That's helpful. And then I guess maybe just on the ACV acceleration that you are seeing here for three quarters in a row now. But can you just maybe help us think about maybe what is helping to drive that acceleration? Like, are there certain use cases or industries or geographies that are helping to support that? And I guess, secondarily does this maybe change how you view that, I guess, initial 11% annual guide that you've had for ACV growth for the year?

Yeah. So Steve, this is Ken. So, a couple of things. One, we are seeing accelerated ACV growth in every region the US, EMEA and APJ. So I'll start there. Not every vertical is accelerating at the same level, so that when you get into verticals and geographies naturally you're reducing the sample size. So -- but I would say, across the globe geographies are all growing. They're all accelerating. The second part of that is where are we getting it from? We're getting it from new logos? Are we getting it from new workflows? Are we getting it from existing clients increasing the volume it's really across the board? We've had net new logo growth in Q3. We had expansion of new workloads with existing clients. We've had actually expansion of existing workloads with new clients. We've actually had a little bit of the start of some migration Pega Cloud. I mean, we're still very early in the migrations but we have had some. So I think it's just that across the board, new logos, existing logos, migrations and across the world. So I really couldn't point to just one thing and say, it's North American health care just making that up. It's not something that is not dynamic, which is incredibly encouraging, which means that Blueprint and the way we're engaged with our clients universally driving acceleration in our business. When you get to look at the next two to five years, you say what might this do to change the business? This is a transformational opportunity for Pega to reaccelerate our business back up to levels that we haven't seen for probably three to five years, right? So I think -- and there's no reason that even those growth rates something that could be a ceiling. We have to execute of course. So we have to -- and we are going to be dependent on not only our existing clients but actually exploring new logos strategically in our target or model the logos. So great opportunity for us. In terms of this year, which is the last part of your question certainly the energy as I mentioned in Q4 is high, also the Q4 activity that we have is very high but also there's always a lot of work to do in the Q4. So I think that we're certainly feeling good about where we are, but we are not in the habit of re-guiding. So I think we just -- what we want to do is we want to be our targets. I mean, that's a fundamental DNA that we want to have, but we've got to execute and we've got work to do.

And Q4 is by far the toughest of the year.

Yeah, Q4 is always a tough quarter. The last point I would make is, any growth -- in any scenario where our growth would exceed our model for 2024. And that is not -- that's not a re-guide is making this clarification. It's probably not likely to lead to any change in our cash flow modeling, because the billings happen toward the end of the year. It would give us however upside for free cash flow next year in 2025. I just want to make that very clear. So for anyone that's thinking about the relationship between the two of others.

Okay. Perfect. No, that make sense. So thanks for taking the questions here.

Thanks, Steve.

Your next question comes from the line of Jake Roberge with William Blair. Please go ahead.

Yeah. Thanks for taking the question. And great to see ACV growth continue to accelerate. You all made the comment that Gen AI Blueprint is expanding your TAM by bringing new applications into the scope of what you can address. Can you provide examples of that? And is there any thought of pouring any gas or putting more go-to-market capacity behind those initiatives?

So I think that a big part of the example I would give would be the idea of helping organizations replace some of their legacy systems in a different way. Historically, we used to talk about going into an organization, and you're seeing the power Pega workflow or the power Pega decisioning to wrap and renew their existing systems. And that was again built a meaningful business. But what we've now realized with some of these new capabilities and with what AI can do, we can more directly target the systems that our customers just want to kill. All of these organizations particularly as they try to move to the cloud and sometimes find that as many as two-thirds of their applications are incapable of being moved to the cloud in their current form. They want to rethink what they've got, but they don't really want to start over. That's daunting. We can use Blueprint and we can use some of the new capabilities that we continue to add to be able to really target replacement in a way that moves these systems onto a cloud native platform moves them into a thoroughly modern architecture and lets them both get it to the cloud, but also just run way more effectively and unwalk the data that's buried in some of these applications that they just can't get to. So I think that this legacy transformation approach is one that you're going to see us doubling down on as we enter next year and it is pretty exciting. Relative to ramping up investment, we've kind of come to enjoy the reality of generating cash and spending our money perhaps more carefully than I might have done earlier in our career. So we're open to do more investments, but I really become a believer that candidly when we really focused ourselves we actually increased our growth rate and so we're going to be cautious about opening an aperture too broadly too fast. Though to be candid there's big opportunities here. They're not going to go away in a year or three. They're going to be here for quite some time.

Yeah. That's great to hear. And then Alan, it sounds like you've been on the road meeting with a lot of clients recently. Can you maybe just give us a pulse on the market. Is that excitement all around Blueprint? Are you starting to see potentially more budget dollars actually flow into AI and automation as we get into potentially a more normalized budget environment?

Yeah. So customers are really hungry for automation. There's a lot of confusion out there. I mean you only have to read the press releases of the players of these spaces to realize how much noise there continues to be in the markets. And people are trying to figure out. So step back for a second Pega, if you go back to my PegaWorld keynote, I talked about the three forms of AI that we see as transforming organization. And customers tell me what they were to make sense to them. But the noise of the market doesn't match this. I mean that we talk about statistical AI, how we use numbers and machine learning to figure out next best actions. And someday has been down for 15 years. It's something we've done for 15 years. And it's enormously powerful, and it's not obviated by language models. Out of general intelligence, I think, is some cool ideas. But numbers matter and language models don't do so great with numbers. So that's the first form of AI, statistical. The second is what I would describe as AI features. And we've got several dozen of them. Customers will buy some from us. They'll buy some from the accelerators and the magic agents that you hear people marketing and putting out there. And that's fine. So our customers are building some themselves. And there is enthusiasm for those, but there's not the belief that those are fundamentally changing an organization's business. The thing that we're most excited about is that Blueprint represents, and I think we are uniquely positioned here is this idea of AI transformation. The idea is that you use AI to better understand what your current applications are and then use AI to challenge a lot of the assumptions about how an app should be built and then to actually help execute that. We're advantaged that becomes a lot about Blueprint. But the reality is, is that Blueprint itself is not truly at the core. The core is the hang-up architecture, the model-driven architecture that knows how to really automate with AI principles and with high levels of channel independents, that Blueprint just happens to perfectly fit into. So I think that a lot of confusion about AI still, but more when customers see what we're able to do and when they put their hands on, like I talked about how many customers are touching this now, we got a really positive reaction.

Jake, one thing I'll add is just to say, as we check for everybody here. We've got a war in Eastern Europe that's been going on for 2.5 years. We have a conflict in the Middle East. It certainly doesn't look like it's going to end anytime in the next few months. We've got an election in 12 days, and we still don't have inflation in check. So I do think there is still nervousness in the market. That said, I think clients are committed to digital transformation. But I do think there are a lot of market events that are going to cause clients to still be a little bit timid in some of their bigger decisions. And so just a sanity check on that. There's a lot of stuff going on out there.

Yes. That's helpful. Well, congrats again on the great results.

Thanks, Jake.

Your next question comes from the line of Rishi Jaluria with RBC. Please go ahead.

Wonderful. Thanks so much for taking my questions and great to see continued momentum in the business. Maybe, Alan, I want to start with you. You talked about what you're doing on the agenetic automation objective AI side. Can you help us understand maybe what separates Pega and what you're doing that is truly agenetic AI, whether that's tech or use cases and maybe have it separated from some other large players that have been messaging around agenetic AI themselves, including Salesforce with the recent launch of Agentforce [ph]. Any color to help us really understand the differentiation there would be helpful. And then I've got a quick follow-up.

Sure. Look, Pega and this is something that I think has been visible for a long time because it's part of how we thought about the problem. Believes that you really want to have definitions of how a business works, that it's important to be able to map the processes, where the data comes from, where it's going to end up. And there are some people in a genetic world who say just turn it all over to a language model, it's going to be so smart. It's going to figure everything out. It will be a chain of consciousness and come up with magic answers. We think that may be true in some cases. And certainly it's good for entertainment. But whether our customers' businesses are going to want to run that way, I don't believe regulated businesses are going to be able to run that way. I think a lot of organizations stay comfort, in using the AI to define the processes, which for example what Blueprint does as opposed to just saying "Hey, I'm going to call the agent and it's going to figure it out. And I'm not going to be exactly sure how I would explain that but they're pretty smart." So we have what I would describe as a managed approach. And the great news is this left the organization achieve great reliability. Because if you've got hundreds of thousands of people doing something, you turn that increasingly to automation, I think you want to know what they're doing. And the workflow-type approach that is at the heart of Pega fits that model going forward. Having said that, those workflows are intrinsically a genetic, they in effect make it so you know the steps, know how to do certain things and can apply the AI to fill gaps to figure out what field should go, figure out how to best answer or ask a question. And that's where we've married a genetic world with the workflow world in a way that I think fits perfectly. I believe customers are seeing that. Quite a lot of the agents talk now to some of the early talk in AI in general, where it candidly I think led to a lot of confusion. Having said that we're all bought in, we've got agents for years that are doing things like parsing and responding automatically to e-mails to stimulate to working as a chatbot. We just don't want to build the organization around the assumption that there are humans in the loop. We want to build around the work itself. What are the products that a company is offering, what are the services they're offering, how do we capture those in workflows. And then as you see as people who need it, use the AI where you need it, use the interfaces and that is exactly what the center of architecture is which I'm sure many have heard me talk about now for three years, four years.

Got it. Wonderful. That's really helpful. And then maybe for both Alan and Ken, if we think about maybe the Q4 outlook now that we're a little bit over through recent to the quarter how should we be thinking about the potential for budget flush? Ken, I know you outlined it as a tough comp from a strong Q4 last year. I think there are rumblings that Q4 budget could be even stronger especially as some of those kind of earmarked AI dollars are put to work before the year-end. Can you maybe walk us through how we should be thinking about the potential for Q4 budget flush from here? Thanks.

Well, so just one clarification there Rishi. Last year the reason why it was stronger for us is that we actually had a lot of our business activity just kind of delayed and slipped into the back end of the year and that didn't happen this year. So just from the standpoint of Pega, we are difficult to pair -- is really just a timing compare of the way to linearity the way the shape of our growth linked last year versus the shape of the growth this year. In terms of the specific question you asked and Alan can chime in his opinion, I don't put a lot of business comfort around decisions around whether people try to use up budget from one year or another year. It happens. I think that there is a potential. I've read some of the same articles that you have as well. But I don't think -- we're not running our business assuming that happens or doesn't happen. We have a very healthy pipeline, we have very strong engagement with our clients. And if clients then choose to use budget in Q4, naturally, we'll get our fair share of that. But I don't think we have a strong modeling opinion about whether there's a flush or there is not a flush.

Yes, I'm a little skeptical. I think there's a lot of CEOs out there. who have directed their procurement and IT arms to try to save money to be bought. I mean let's face it that mood is very prevalent if you take a look at what's going on. So, I'm certainly not counting on any sort of flushing going on that's going to be meaningful.

Perfect. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Pinjalim Bora with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you for taking the question and congrats on the quarter. Alan earlier in the year, I think there was an assumption that we might see a material uptick in the Blueprints created so far in the year kind of going live in Q3. What have you seen in terms of some of the Blueprints going live? And are those go lives starting to impact some of the cloud numbers at this point?

So, I think that we've seen a couple go live. We have a bunch more in progress. The Blueprint have candidly influenced every sale that I can see in terms of certainly in the last six to eight weeks. We don't have a single sales guy who can't do a Blueprint with a client. And we've gone from a salesperson would try to have a bunch of meetings and then try to bring a solution consultant in to maybe the third or fourth meeting to do a client-specific demo. That whole engagement model is already meaningfully changed. And they now do the demo in the first meeting almost always. And it's client-specific because that's what Blueprint gives you. The effect this has on business is projects that were already underway some of the Blueprint is coming in a little too light to really be able to help them. So, the stuff that was going live in Q3. We'll see some meaningfully I think go live in Q4 and the first half of next year.

Got it. Okay. One for Ken. Maintenance ACV has declined all three quarters this year which makes sense given the cloud trend. But I'm trying to understand how much of that is just because of mix shift to new bookings being cloud versus kind of on-premise customers making a concerted effort to migrate to cloud. Is that migration piece starting to take hold? Is that going to be even bigger piece in 2025?

Yes. So, Pinjalim not much we've had some migrations, but not a material amount of them. They will become bigger in 2025 and 2026. So, you're absolutely right there. Maintenance will continue to decline and probably at a steeper pace in terms of that maintenance decline. But the maintenance decline that will happen at Pega can happen in two ways. It could be that someone moves off of a -- historically moved off a perpetual license arrangement into a term license arrangement, which means that the proportion of what they do -- the business that they do with Pega is less maintenance and another one could be a migration to pay wow. So, those are just to clarify those are two ways maintenance could drop. But there have been -- we've got some momentum on migrations. We've had some through the year for sure, but it's not a material component of our incremental ACV growth. But you're going to – to answer the second part of your question, maintenance is going to decline. No doubt about it and going to decline probably at a steeper pace than previous years.

Got it. Very clear. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Patrick Walravens with Citizens JMP. Please go ahead.

Great. This is Austin Cole on for Pat Walravens. My question is about the reversal of the $2 billion verdict by the Virginia court appeals last July. I just wanted to understand – like to the extent that you can comment, does that have any effect on unlocking sales cycles that might have been tied up with some of your larger clients? And are you seeing any impact from that?

So I do think that clients were happy to see that erroneous were got reversed. And so – but what I'd tell you is I think that people particularly of light have been largely expecting that. That's why you can see a $2 billion change in market cap, right? I mean that tells you that everybody has sort of discounted it. I think as a drag on and on and went through the appeal process discounted to a meaningful amount. Obviously, it had some positive impact. And I'll also tell you that these large buying organizations, all it takes is one group to sort of worry and they can slow things down. So I do think it's not – it's going to sort of return us to a more traditional cycle whereas we had had to go through sort of more sometimes rounds of questions on occasion with this. So – but yes, we're happy to see that we've gotten through that reversal stage. But God knows, we expected it.

Yes. I think just to add to that, 2022 was a very distracting year for our teams into 2023, where just every – many, many clients want to know what is this thing? What is happening? What's the next? I think once the actual audio was public on the appeal from the fall of 2023 enough clients heard that that they kind of went okay, we understand now the significant error as the appellate court called it right that happened. And then it was a waiting game to figure out where they landed in terms of the actual appeal. So I do think incrementally over the last few years things have gotten better from what was quite frankly, a very difficult time in 2022 because not only were clients hearing it, there was quite a lot of marketing done around the actual verdict as well against Pega. And so we had to really fight some things on multiple fronts. Now that the appellate court has clearly pointed out what we have said since May 9, 2022, which was – this was really just a series of errors that actually caused this. It certainly made those conversations much better, which made it easier for our sales teams, which make our sales teams to be able to spend more time selling. So there's certainly a win there in our favor.

Great. That’s super helpful. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Dan Ives with Wedbush Securities. Please go ahead.

Thanks and great, great quarter. So are you seeing now from a partner perspective just even changes were more coming to you in terms of looking to partner, especially you kind of go into this next phase of cloud?

I think there's a lot of enthusiasm from the partners. We just had a couple of partner meetings and we do have partners very, very interested in figuring out how they can leverage Blueprint. We've actually had partners create, I think the number is more than 70 now Blueprints that we've loaded in for their use that are private to them that they can use with their customers to try to convince them that they've got some good extra IP to be able to add into it. And so that's actually very encouraging to see more than a dozen partners or more than 70 Blueprints into our system.

I also think, Dan, just to point out one other thing. Our engagement with AWS and Google Cloud is really accelerating as well. I mean, we view them both very, very strong and important partners for us as we continue to move to Pega Cloud as we continue to accelerate our growth rate with Blueprint in the center of that and us really playing a much bigger role in digital transformation. So they are becoming much bigger market partners for us as opposed to technical partners.

And thanks because that's exactly what I was getting to like, does this feel like with the hyperscalers with Blueprint now? And just with the overall strategy relative to even -- when I think where you guys were a year ago? Is it just so much more strategic discussions now when you think even from a hyperscaler in terms of those discussions?

Absolutely. I mean not -- there's two reasons why there is that much more important. One, we've got $0.75 billion of engagement with our clients that are not on Pega Cloud. And naturally the hyperscalers care about that. And those clients that we have by the way are their clients as well. So that's one Dan. The second one is as we continue to accelerate our growth, leveraging Blueprint faster digital transformation, we're going to put those workloads on our partners -- on the hyperscaler partners that we have. So we're just in a whole different world of actually the opportunity for us mutually to target organizations where we have common customers. And so that for us is a very strategic differentiator and we think has led actually quite frankly just some of our growth this year and also will lead to growth in the future.

And the work we've been doing to be able to help clients take out their legacy applications is of great interest to the hyperscalers, because they are the customers who have gone buys who have made commitments. But a lot of the apps in those customers aren't able to move, because God forbid they're running on IV mainframe or Lotus Notes. So I was just talking to a customer a little over yesterday about part of their lots not sustain. And they need to rethink and replace those. But that enables them now to rethink and replace them on the cloud, which is what our whole pitch is here with the legacy transformation that I was talking about.

Great. Congrats. Great to see. Thanks.

Thanks, Dan.

Your next question comes from the line of Mark Schappel with Loop Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you for taking my question. And nice job on the quarter. Ken a question for you. In terms of momentum in the business this year, how much of that would you attribute to changes in the overall demand environment versus say the go-to-market changes that were made about a year or so ago?

I would attribute them to two things honestly. And I don't think either of them are in the demand environment. I would attribute it to our selling transformation that we made. And quite frankly, Alan mentioned something that scarcity is a powerful tool to use for focus, right? And the fact that we actually really focused on driving the right people on the right works and the right level of density has really helped us a lot. And the second one is, quite frankly, I think I wouldn't minimize the impact of the appeal and helping us with a much more positive engagement with our clients. I mean, I think the reality is that was -- that certainly was not hurtful but right for the appeals actually get reversed. But I think it's largely the target work transformation, Mark. I think the market is pretty much the same as what it was a year ago.

Yeah. Honestly, I also think that the product portfolio we have when I think of what we've been able to put together in the last 12 to 18 months, I think it is candidly just more appealing and more effective gaining the interest of our clients. So I would agree, it's not the demand environment, which I think there's still a lot of downward outlook out there.

Great. Thank you. And then as a follow-up, the September quarter is typically a strong federal period for the company. I was wondering, if you could just talk about how the federal business performed this quarter. And maybe just a little bit on the impact of the new FedRAMP High what the impact that's having on your business?

So FedRAMP High wouldn't have impacted our business at all because that requires pipeline time to build. And the US public sector was not an outsized contributor to our growth. I mean, it's a healthy business, but we -- our growth was not on the backs of a Q3 public sector in the US deal. I've mentioned this before, we don't see that type of a hockey stick in our business around one particular quarter in the public sector. It's active, but it's not something that drives our business in one quarter.

Thank you.

Thanks, Mark.

Your next question comes from the line of Blair Abernethy with Rosenblatt. Please go ahead.

Thanks very much. Good quarter, guys. Just a question on the product side for Blueprint. Alan, I'm just wondering, where do you see some of the features going for this -- for the Blueprint? What's the road map here? And is there a role or your -- the ever flow acquisition you made back in 2022, the process mining side of things? Just kind of wondering where you're going to take the product?

Yeah. So there is -- the imports the blueprint are kind of what customers are already doing. We want to use the AI to figure out the best we can from documentation or other things we get about the customer. We've already implemented the ability to import BPMN. Our process mining capability can feed into that because it can actually generate the BPMN that we can then feed into Blueprint. So I do think there's really good alignment between the various piece parts all tied into this legacy transformation element. What you're going to see us focusing on going forward with both our 2024 release and the work that we do early next year is a lot more work to make us beautifully compatible with clients' open architecture databases and what sometimes referred to as cloud native databases environments, which by the way, the hyperscalers love that sort of stuff. And we have things that are -- have been released or being released and are being built that will just continue to push on that between now and PegaWorld which is a really big moment for us.

Okay. Great. Thank you. And just Ken just following on your question about vertical a couple of responses about the verticals. Were there any verticals in the third quarter if you'd call out as saying hey these were particularly stronger versus others that might have lagged your expectations?

No, nothing noticeable.

Yeah. It was a really good balance. It was -- I would say it was an unsexy quarter in terms of where we got our growth from. It was pretty much everywhere.

Okay. Great. Super. Thanks very much guys.

Your next question comes from the line of Patrick Walravens [ph] with Citizens JMP. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you for letting me ask a follow up. I was just wondering Alan how has the competitive environment shifted for you guys over the last year or two with now that you have Blueprint and with everything that's going on in AI? And maybe in particular, when you compete against Salesforce, when do you win? And when do they win?

So it will be interesting to see what happens with Salesforce given their recent announcements and the changes to their go-to market, I still think we've got a terrific message that says, hey you might stick Salesforce if your front ended. But unless you want 100% of your business walked into Salesforce, which pretty I think risky thing for a lot of businesses to take. You really need to be able to go across channels and go across back end. That center out message, which you've heard me talk about for a long time. I think that fits perfectly with our AI strategy and I think customers are seeing it. It's exciting for me to go visit a client and have them talk to me about Center and so I think we are quite advantaged in terms of our architecture. And in terms of the things that we've done literally for decades coming together to be leveraged by AI. And that's why Blueprint is exciting. It's not a SKU. It's really Hey., this takes the entire Pega staff and reposition it in a way that's tremendously more dynamic tremendously easier to implement. And I think it's going to open up lots of new opportunities. And that's what we're chasing with all of this. So I think we're really a slight advantage, when it comes to an AI and an overall transformation story.

Awesome. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen that does conclude our question-and-answer session. And now I will turn the call back over to Alan Trefler for closing comments.

Well, thank you everybody for listening. We're very excited about where we are and what we see going on. I think it's going to be an interesting end of the year and we're going to work and set ourselves up for traffic 2025. Thank you very much everyone.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation and you may now disconnect.