Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the PDF Solutions Incorporated conference call to discuss its financial results for the third quarter ending Wednesday, August 31, 2022. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] If you have not yet received a copy of the corresponding press release, it has been posted to PDF’s website at www.pdf.com. Some of the statements that will be made in the course of the conference are forward-looking, including statements regarding PDF’s future financial results and performance, growth rates and demand for its solutions. PDF’s actual results could differ materially. You should refer to the section entitled Risk Factors on Pages 17 through 30 of PDF’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, and similar disclosures in subsequent SEC filings. The forward-looking statements and risks stated in this conference call are based on information available to PDF today. PDF assumes no obligation to update them. Now, I’d like to introduce John Kibarian, PDF’s President and Chief Executive Officer; and Adnan Raza, PDF’s Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Kibarian, please go ahead.

Thank you for joining us on today’s call. If you’ve not already seen our earnings press release, management report and 10-Q for the third quarter, please go to the Investors section of our website where each has been posted. I will start the discussion by providing commentary on the third quarter and early part of the fourth quarter. From there, I’ll provide our impressions of the current state of the semiconductor industry, the situation in respect to geopolitical factors and the potential impact of the general economy on our business. I will conclude with our expectations for PDF business for the remainder of the year before handing the call over to Adnan for a more detailed financial update. On our last quarter’s call, we expressed our confidence in the second half of 2022 bookings. We pointed out that protracted nature of some of our large multi-element engagements with customers would mean that, that bookings would be lumpy and generally stronger in the second half than the first half. The third and early fourth quarter bookings show that we are realizing that prediction. Notable [ph] include bookings of Cimetrix on-time licenses were near all-time highs, even as our equipment partners continue to experience part shortages that limited some of their shipments. Bookings of Exensio in the quarter included an eight-figure contract with a large integrated device manufacturer to renew cloud-hosted manufacturing analytics for a number of additional years and to add deployment of test operations for both the customers’ internal test and multiple assets [ph], which enables this customer to leverage the platform benefits. And at the beginning of the fourth quarter, we booked a multiyear renewal for characterization and DFI infrastructure and for services for a customer using PDF systems on the leading-edge. The last contract enables our customers’ engineers…

Thank you, John. Good afternoon, everyone. Good to speak again with you today, and I hope all of you and your families are keeping safe. We are pleased to review the financial results of the third quarter and to bring you up to date on the progress of the business. We have posted our earnings release and management report on the Investor Relations section of our website. Our Form 10-Q has also been filed with the SEC today. Please note that all of the financial results we discuss on today’s call will be on a non-GAAP basis, and a reconciliation to GAAP financials is provided in the materials on our website. Financial results for the third quarter of 2022 were strong and continued our momentum with record revenue and solid year-over-year performance. It is worth noting that with the Cimetrix acquisition, which closed in 2020, this year 2022 will reflect an entirely organic revenue growth year versus last year. We are pleased to report that third quarter total revenue was $39.9 million, up 35% from the comparable quarter last year and up 15% versus the prior quarter of Q2 this year. Our strong results were positively impacted by four factors. First, our 2022 bookings through today surpassed our full year 2021 bookings. The largest deal for the third quarter was a multiyear $10-plus million Exensio deal with revenue recognition over time, which we believe has the opportunity to expand over the contract term and sets us up well for renewal from future elevated levels. Q4 bookings through today exceed $100 million and will be recognized over multiple years. Including this, bookings for the second half of the year are already two times larger than bookings for the first half of the year. Second, we experienced onetime increases this quarter in…

[Operator Instructions] Andrew do you have a question.

Yes. So on the last call you talked about having identified I think a valuable application at DFI and sort of your initial customer was usage have noticeably risen and sort of enthusiasm for telling either additional tools and driving sort of further adoption and commercialization perhaps you could give us a little bit more of an update did that deal in that you signed in early Q4 does that include an additional machine any other sort of color you could provide on that would be great.

Sure, Andrew. Yes. And the contract that we described in that we signed in early Q4 does include and it’s actually the piece of it is these applications, a particular one that we talked about on the last call for design for inspection in the eProbe and does include eProbe shipment in the contract. As I said in the prepared remarks, it also includes the ability to consume additional machines as negotiated in the terms of the contract as well. So they have the ability to expand beyond what is minimally committed in the contract also. And that’s why I spoke with some confidence on the last call. And as I said in prepared remarks, these are very large significant contracts that bookings tend to be lumpy. So one eight-figure contract closed in the quarter in Q3. And the other contracts that we talked about, the total bookings value for the other contracts in excess of $100 million in Q4, that was signed in the early part of Q4.

Second, that eight-figure, I think IDM Exensio deal sounded like it was both [indiscernible] to work internally as well as at their OSAT. Is this I think you’ve talked in the past about sort of trying to secure some like deep thread customers for to really ramp or expand the DEX networks at OSATs to create this sort of virtuous ability to share information throughout the ecosystem. Is that involved here? Is this am I reading too much into that?

You’re correct, Andrew. Yes, this does include both support for their internal test floors, which is a closed world as well as PDF supporting fully DEX nodes as their OSATs run on PDFs environment so that they as well as others can enjoy real time access to their test flow. And as well as some other contracts that we’ve been doing, that some of which we’ll talk about in the future, expand the network of DEX nodes, and I think it give customers more real-time access to their data around the world.

And then I guess maybe the last question I had was, obviously, great to see the strength in the bookings through this call. What are you seeing activity-wise sort of as you look through the balance of the quarter? Is there still strong demand? Is there going to change in behavior at all?

Yes. It’s been obviously, the fourth quarter start up very strong. We still have a number of contracts in discussion, negotiation with customers, and we expect we are not done yet for the quarter. We’re not sending everyone home on holiday in November 10 or whatever it is today. So there’s enough there’s quite a bit to get done for the remainder of the year. We do see a lot of activity on the part of our customers and desire to move forward. Obviously, we’re not immune to and not oblivious to the slowdown in the chip industry overall and the economy. But so far, it’s been very good for us and continues to be. We just don’t know what that means for 2023. We could look at it and say, "Well, it’s great. Everything is going to be super great, when you click out and say, "Okay, the general economy is going to be bad. And at this point, we have no we have no reason to change our own outlook internally. I don’t know how you guys are all going to build your models, but I don’t know under what data you could use to meaningfully move models up or down in this environment because it’s there’s been a lot of local things that are quite good for us. And when you look in the general market and say, there’s a lot of troubling things out there geopolitically and general economy anyway.

Great. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] We’ll now hear from Tom Diffely from D.A Davidson.

Yes, hello, good afternoon. And it turns out that I pressed star 1 like 20 times and the last time it finally worked. So there was a little something wrong with the system getting to go. I’m sure there’s probably others that have been pressing star 1 as well. Anyway, John, I was wondering if you could just give us a little bit more of your view of how the geopolitical restrictions are going to impact you in kind of the mid and long term. I know there’s a lot of cross currents that are going on right now, but just from a just a big picture point of view.

Yes. So from a big picture perspective, Tom, we’ve been trying to square the circle. Of course, there’s specific things with respect to our products, which ones what we can and can’t do in China and how we can operate in China. And there’s a number of layers to that. Not only do the products need to have no U.S. content, but also the way you operate that needs to be in situations where you don’t have U.S. people. If you’re going to work with ABC factories, what we called ABC advanced node factories. We believe most of our activity with customers is not on leading-edge, but actually on trailing edge facilities, fabless companies accessing trailing edge fabs and other parts of the supply chain. And so when we looked at our forecast out for bookings in 2023 and 2024, we think some of the things that were associated with leading-edge probably won’t happen because for a variety of reasons. Not the least of which they can’t get equipment to do what they need to do. And at the same time, we see customers accelerating what they’re doing on trailing edge nodes in China. And so we think it’s going to change their buying behavior, which is kind of what we put in my prepared remarks. And we think we have plenty to sell them on those nodes and capabilities. So kind of irrespective of what we are able to do with leading-edge fabs, it doesn’t really matter very much. We think most of the market for us in China will be on the mature nodes in 2023. And then what we don’t know is just, how will the buying patterns change in China. Obviously, U.S. has been very aggressive with these restrictions. We don’t know how the Chinese government will react and what that means. And so it gives us a moment of pause just to think, okay, we don’t really – even whether we have, even if we have customers that want to buy and we have things that we can sell them and ways of delivering, et cetera. We don’t know what it really means over the long-term. So the short and medium term, it’s been quite good for us on 28-nanometers, we talked about the Gainshare on Exensio usage, et cetera. When we look further out, we’re going to assess what really is going to happen. I think it’s very hard to forecast the future in this regard like this.

Okay. That’s very helpful. When you look at the mature nodes, is it across the board of the mature nodes? Or is there a particular sector like power or silicon carbide that’s really driving a lot of that activity level right now?

It is across the board there. They have a big effort on electrification of automobiles in China. So, you do see a lot on the high-voltage stuff going on in China. You see also 28-nanometer in microcontrollers and in IoT of things and stuff like that and everything in between. So, we do see quite a bit of activity with customers across many product families that are not subject to U.S. restrictions at this time.

Okay. And then moving over to the Gainshare. It sound like there was about a $2 million onetime piece of that. Was that just for work done in prior quarters? Is it a catch-up period as well? Or is there something more to it?

Yes. First of all, we are happy that, that Gainshare number is much higher than we expected. And overall, it helps the trend compared to Q3 of last year for what we are seeing. So yes, I think the right way to think about it is on a year-to-date basis in terms of progress. And yes, it’s related to later reporting from the customer, particularly some of those customers were experiencing some COVID-related shutdowns. So from a reporting standpoint, they’re caught up with the reporting during this quarter.

Okay. But it looks like if you take out that $2 billion, you’re, okay – John.

Production inside 2022, right, that they caught up on reporting in Q3 in part because I think some of their ability to operate their offices during the COVID shutdowns.

Okay. But if you take out the $2 million, you’re still – you’re showing some nice growth in that line item?

Yes. I mean Q3, just for that particular customer and of itself, even if you took out the onetime adjustments it was a very respectable growth compared to Q1 and Q2 of this year. So overall from this customer, we’re starting to see the volumes ramp up similar to what John said earlier, that is trailing edge volumes that we see picking up.

Great. And then finally, obviously, nice to see the Advantest offer the DPT come out. How many such projects do you have that are going to, do you think rolling out over the next several years?

Well, certainly, it’s hard to forecast, Tom. But I can say over the next couple of quarters, we expect to put out a number of additional applications for Advantest that you’ll see us announce. And there’s also other activities with Siemens testing and productization [ph] going on work with – in cell phone productization on work there, activities with SAP and the productization of the integration of analytics with ERP systems. So each one of these partnerships, when we take them on, we make a commitment on the development side, not just the kind of marketing and press release side of it. And so there will be products associated at least one product associated with each one of these releases. And in the case of Advantest, where we have the most work going on. We are already at the four on the website plus DPT and a handful more of them in the next couple of quarters, so we’ll quickly be approaching 10 apps across just for them.

Great to hear. Okay. Well, thank you both for your time today.

Next is from Auguste Richard of Northland.

Yes. Thanks for taking the question. I think I’d be, Tom, on the number of times I hit star 1. Real quick on this new contract you’ve got a part of it is DFI. It sounds like it is a subscription service? Or are you shipping a tool? And sort of what does that do to the availability of DFI tools after this transaction?

Sure. It does include shipping the tool. As I said in my prepared remarks, Exensio and our IT hardware what we call Templatizer, our design manufacturing – optimization software we call fire [ph]. Those are available on the Exensio Cloud, so they access that from the cloud. But obviously, the characterization vehicles and the DFI infrastructure needs to be on-premise. And so those are on-premise and that will ship. That will, of course, reduce will take – we have fewer machines that we could ship. To be candid with you, Gus, so we have really only a couple that we could truly ship to customers at this point beyond what we’re committed to in 2023. And we also we’re very careful to make sure we’ve got customers really fully getting maximum value of what we shipped and moving appropriately. We think there’s plenty of revenue growth on the way we’ve structured the business so that we can make sure we support the customer well and they get the full leverage of the capability. I think we’re well on the way to making that work with this existing installed base as well as being able to take on additional customer.

Got it. And then on the eight-figure deal that was an existing customer, it sounds like it was a new contract. Could you give me a sense if they were at a certain run rate? How much did it increase in this new contract? And then, do you have other ones like it teed up?

Yes. Specific to how much it increased. It was in the tens of percent. The specific number, I don’t know off the top of my head. It is an expansion on all their test floors. It is a movement to the cloud for the infrastructure from a very distributed on-premise deployment. It also includes the ability for them to expand into advanced AI and analytics, connections to their ERP and other things that are upsells as well as expansions on number of testers and cloud capacity, et cetera. So while it is a big deal on it is, I think, the largest contract with the exception of Advantest that we’ve ever closed for Exensio, it has the ability to grow pretty substantially. Secondly, do we have others like this? Yes, almost all of our customers many of the customers, I should say, all many of our customers that are on Exensio cloud manufacturing analytics are starting to see the potential of connecting their cloud to the edge with our Dexnotes and edge capability, as ability for them to get higher operational efficiency on their manufacturing assets, better product quality and better product yields. And in this case, we were able to demonstrate that to the customer, and we really spiked about the commitment they made to Exensio, and we are engaged with other customers on similar expansions. Some of them are partway through their contract. This is a customer that was at the end of their time-based licenses. So it all got done as one renewal. Other customers, you may see them just tack on contract value, but the annual recurring run rate will be similar in size, if not larger.

Okay. So this was a transition from TBL to perpetual?

No, to cloud.

To cloud, rather.

Yes, not perpetual.

Yes. My best. And then last one for me. On the deferred revenue line, it was up quite a bit sequentially. And I was just wondering what that was related to?

Yes. I mean part of it is going to be billings that happened within the quarter. We have some big customers, one of them that John mentioned related to Advantest, right? So when we the billing, then the deferred revenue will move up because of that, and then we’ll work our way through consuming that. Of course, some of the bookings number, if they’ve been built, we’ll also start to reflect on that. So overall, it’s the billings related impact that you will start to see in the deferred revenue, which we’re happy about.

Got it. All right. Thanks so much.

Thanks, Gus sorry about the [Technical Difficulty].

Yes. It happens.

[Operator Instructions] Next we’ll hear from Christian Schwab of Hallum Capital Group.

Hey guys. So just a quick question, maybe it was in the prepared comments. I know we talked about greater than $100 million in bookings. I think last quarter, you said your backlog was at $184 million. Do you have an updated number for us?

Yes. We put it in the filing. It’s about $185 million, which, by the way, yes, it’s only up about $1 million or so, but the reality is the fact that we had a record revenue quarter and still were able to incrementally move up the backlog is something that makes us.

And the $100 million of bookings that we discussed on the call, Christian, you might have missed was it for Q4. So it’s what Adnan is referring to is the value at the end of Q3. So you would take that booking and make it additive to that backlog number.

Excellent. Okay. Perfect. That’s where I was slightly confused. And then I appreciate, I think in the beginning of the prepared remarks, I think you guys were going to wait one more quarter to given the situation in China and slowdown in dislocations, certain high-volume markets that the semiconductor industry is facing. That being said, we started the year thinking that we were at 20% to 25% business. We’re going to end up at 30%. We’ve added new partners. We’ve just talked about big huge deals, and we talked about the huge bookings as they’re going to happen in Q4. I mean as a baseline, I assume it’s safe for us to still think about 20% to 25% for 2023.

Yes. I mean, at this point, Christian, we really we are we normally would give this perspective in our February call, and we still want to and that would be in the year where there’s kind of more visibility. This is a pretty crazy year. I jokingly said I like our house. I’m not sure about the neighborhood. When you just look around, we don’t know how that stuff isn’t going to affect us at some point. So far, it hasn’t. We had obviously a great year on the progress we had a great year. So we are just being cautious. If I were, we’re not changing our internal models. I don’t know why someone would change the models on the outside yet until we get a little further along. It’s very easy to just go back and change them because I understand what you’re talking about, it’s all – when you look at our pattern, it’s very positive and it’s easy to get excited. But at this point, prudence maybe to not change things until we understand more about the world.

Great. And then my last question is just for the clarity on China. So, you have limited exposure on leading-edge Memory or Foundry, Logic customers where a lot of – well, where the government has stopped the ability of U.S. companies to work with. Did I hear that correct, first? And roughly, of your Chinese exposure, speaking nationalistically, not non-Chinese manufacturers have facilities there who already have received this but nationalistic Chinese-based companies, do you have a rough estimate of your exposure to the leading-edge?

Yes, we do. We believe that we’re relatively insulated from the leading edge on that piece. And we do – but we do look at a place where our own team had forecasted selling into leading-edge facilities that we have to go back and look at. I think the bigger factor than whether we can sell or not and what we can do or not is if you can’t get lithography systems, if you can’t get [indiscernible], if you can’t get deposition tools, and there’s not a lot of data analyzed and there’s nothing you can run a vehicle through. So we think that’s going to change, and we’re already seeing the way customers are reacting a little bit. We believe they’re going to pivot a lot more to mature nodes where their ability to execute is on fettered—and they’re able to execute, as you can see, by nature of our Gainshare report this quarter. So we expect that naturally, the market is going to pivot that way. We’re still waiting to see. That would be very good if that happened. We’re still waiting to see. But we – these are practical business folks over there – they’re going to tilt that wind mills if they can’t execute

Right. Thank you for that. I think a lot of people agree you’ll just take the wafer starts and move it to where they can access the front-end equipment. They’re not going to stop making biconductors. Great. All right. No other questions. Thank you.

Thank you, Christian.

[Operator Instructions] And we’ll now hear from Blair Abernethy of Rosenblatt.

Thanks very much and nice quarter, guys. Adnan, I just wondered if you could just go back for a moment just before you were cut off in your prepared remarks, you started talking about the shadow backlog versus your, I guess your RPO was $185.4 this quarter. Can you just give us a little more insight into how you’re looking at that? And just any way you could size it for us.

Yes. Look, I mean, I’ll tell you explain a little bit more about what we think that goes into the shadow backlog and what it is. In terms of sizing, what we’re doing today is frankly just starting to talk to you all about this. Hopefully, the future analyst there or something like that, we can talk a little bit more about the sizing that would be our desire. But in terms of how we measure backlog, it is and reported in our filings, it is the contracted number that we have from customers, right? But what is not included are the pieces that we alluded to, which is what we call shadow backlog, which is really the Gainshare that would come in the future periods, which could also be the second piece of run-time licenses for Cimetrixs where we just get a customer order and fulfill it within the quarter. And then the third piece, of course, is the overages from Exensio. Even this, we started to get some of those pieces in. And if you look at each one of those, let’s strike at each one of those. And on the Gainshare side, there are customers with whom we have contracts all the way to the end of the decade. On the run-time licenses side, even if the world was to fall apart, there’s an argument we said, okay, there are a certain number of customer shipments that would happen. It sounds like they would be zero. So some estimates would be fair to think about. And similarly, on Exensio usage as that platform is becoming more relevant, more present and broadly adopted within the organization, we have seen the usage go up, so we expect that we’ll be able to touch more.

Maybe I can provide a little bit of like market depth to that answer. So if you just look at Gainshare, we put in our backlog estimate zero. Yes, as we said, the customer surprised us in Q3 with a substantial number. We know it’s not going to zero in Q4. And as Adnan said, those contracts run out through some of them run up through the end of the decade. So in our own model, we started to just go through and say, okay, what would be a likely value per quarter over the next seven years for that contract and that contract and then many other contracts. We used to do better in the old days. We had it for a while because we’ve just gotten so disappointed with the uptake on Gainshare in China that we stopped looking at it similarly with the runtime licenses. The way we work on Cimetrix is we sell a design kit, software design kit, development kit that the customer then embeds our software with their equipment. We don’t put in the backlog any estimate for them selling equipment. But they sold our runtime licenses last quarter were obviously millions of dollars. And so the next quarter, they’re going to sell something, right? And that’s – and once it’s designed into the equipment, they’re not going to take it out right? So for that equipment to like in all likelihood, every time they sell equipment, there will be a runtime license that will come our way. We’ve started to put some estimates on that, assuming a certain shelf life for a piece of equipment and up and down markets, et cetera. And again, it’s similar in magnitude to where we think about the Gainshare number. And then lastly, in our Exensio contracts, if customers want to use more storage or want to be able to load data faster or connect more testers, often, there are overage charges in the contracts. Again, but since those are not committed, those don’t go into our backlog. And now we’re starting to see customers go over and us build them. So we’re starting to understand a little bit about the overage. That’s we’re not the newest in, right? We’ve not been at the cloud business so long. We’re just still learning that one the most I would say that was one we had the least understanding. The other two, we’re starting to understand a little bit better. And that’s kind of the nature of the shadow backlog. It’s not an insignificant number. And we’ll start to quantify it for you all into next year.

That’s really helpful. Thank you very much. Just and one other just sort of question just on renewals. I guess if we’re looking at Cimetrix customers, as an example in particular, what’s the renewal profile look like? Is it for next year? Is it fairly evenly spread out? Or is it kind of more back-end loaded? And what kind of expansion or pricing opportunities you have on some of your renewals?

Yes. I can try to answer that a little bit more broadly. I mean there is – there are renewals every year. I don’t know that we’ve seen like a particular pattern to it yet in terms of one year over the next or one quarter over the next. So I don’t know if we could really give you an answer on the profile from that perspective. As far as – so far on the Exensio renewal year, the average contract value per year has gone up pretty substantially. I talked about them on the call, the last few quarters, but they’re in the tens of percent at least on our annual recurring run rate increases usually pretty substantial. We are still quantifying that to get enough of a sample size that you can kind of draw an inference. For Cimetrix specifically since you asked about that, Blair. There’s really two elements on backlog there. One is the software development kits are used to be perpetuals more and more. We’re selling those on time-based licenses. So those are becoming TBLs too. That is a smaller part of the Cimetrix revenue, the larger part of the Cimetrix revenue is those run-time licenses, which are perpetual licenses we recognized upon the customers accepting the license to put on equipment to sell. There’s been a growing backlog on that over these last few quarters, including in the third quarter, we believe as customers, as I said in my prepared remarks, are not able to ship all the equipment they would have liked to have shipped in the quarter, probably due to the chip shortage. But that backlog as a percentage of the total quarterly revenue is not like the Exensio business, where backlog is much greater than quarterly revenue because it represents most contracts are two or three or four years on like, so backlog at any given time is a very substantial part of the Exensio more than exceptional quarterly revenue many times over.

Okay. Great. Thanks very much, guys.

At this time, there are no further questions. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the program. Thank you for joining us today.