Thank you, Hal. The quarter ended December 31, 2011 was the first in which the anticipated decrease in sales for our largest medical device customer was actually reflected in our financial results. Our medical device products, sales experienced a 27% decrease in the quarter as compared to the corresponding quarter in 2010, partially offset, as Hal mentioned, by an increase in sales to our second largest medical device customer. Sales of motion control products and fractional horsepower motors were relatively flat on a year-over-year basis decreasing 3% and 2%, respectively, when compared to the 2010 quarter. As Hal mentioned, lower sales volume during the quarter was accompanied by diminished manufacturing economies of scale. As a result, midway through the quarter, we affected a reduction in force bringing down our Irvine direct and indirect labor headcount by 20%. This reduction, as any reduction of this magnitude, was painful, but consistent with our commitment to do what is necessary to manage the business at appropriate cost levels, while continuing to make prudent investments for our future.
Regarding our future, I need to first announce that Mr. Paul Rudzinski, previously our VP of Sales, is no longer with the company. In terms of new projects and prospects, I am happy to give you the following update. In our previous conference call, I discussed our award from a major medical device OEM of $191,000 purchase order at the first installment on a program that is expected to exceed $2 million over the next 2 years. Last week, we received a second purchase order valued at approximately $260,000 for additional units under the same program, which all target shipping dates within this current fiscal year.
On another front in January, we executed a supply agreement with a medical device OEM for the manufacture of a new instrument. The release of which is projected by the OEM to take place in late 2014. Under the terms of the agreement, the OEM will buy units from Pro-Dex with a value of $8.7 million over a 5-year period. If the OEM decides to manufacture the instrument either internally or through another supplier, we will be paid up to $3 million of cancellation fees against unmet minimum.
In addition, we have submitted proposals for the same OEM to be its supplier on 3 attachments to the instrument covered by the supply agreement. While we clearly have much more work to do the offset our drop in revenue, these 2 developments I've described represent steps in the right direction. We look forward to the opportunity to build upon these initial successes in future quarters. While we continue to work diligently on identifying future revenue sources, we are also preparing for the likelihood that our revenues will decline before they increase and your leadership team remains committed to navigating carefully through this challenging times.
We will now open the lines for any questions you may have.