Ron Lombardi
Analyst · Raymond James. Your line is now open
Thanks, Phil, and good morning, everyone. Let’s begin on page 5. In Q3, we delivered solid profit and cash flow. This profitability was underpinned by our asset light model and leading position in the OTC. EPS grew over 4% versus the prior year, driven by our strong financial profile and solid free cash flow which allowed us to pay down $55 million in debt during the quarter. This profit performance demonstrates the benefits of our business model which helps partially offset revenue challenges in Q3. Although we continue to experience consumption trends in excessive shipments, Q3’s top line was impacted by significant retailer inventory reductions at the end of the quarter. Despite inventory reductions, additional success is ultimately driven by consumer takeaway where we continue to win. Our brands are well positioned for long-term success using our time tested brand-building playbook to add value for both retailers and consumers. Today we’ll discuss two excellent examples of brands that demonstrate this strategy. So while we’re disappointed in Q3 top line results, we’re confident in the underpinnings of our strategy in what is a challenging retail environment for some of our retail partners. Now let’s turn to slide for more detail on our Q3 results. Our net sales were approximately $241 million down 3.1% versus the prior year on an organic basis. The primary driver to the decline was inventory reductions within the drug channel. Sales performance in North America was positively impacted by continued strength in the GI and ear and eye categories while performance in the oral care subcategory has been impacted by changes at Shelf. In Q3, our international segment was essentially flat versus prior year and is up 2% year-to-date after adjusting for foreign exchange. As a reminder, we can and do experience quarterly timing variation in distributor orders and shipment patterns in our international business. The redesigned BC and Goody’s packaging which we discussed throughout the year has made continual progress and is now largely rolled out across channels. I’m pleased to report initial sell through trends, we made solid with positive consumer feedback aligned with our expectations. Total company gross margin in Q3 came in at 57.7% up 30 basis points sequentially from Q2. Chris will make further comments on gross margin later. Adjusted free cash flow was $57 million in the quarter and continues to benefit from our industry leading EBITDA margin, minimal capital spending needs and low cash tax rates. Last, we paid down $55 million of debt in Q3 with our ongoing cash generation. This continued reduction of debt will enable future capital allocation optionality. With that let’s summarize our year-to-date highlights on slide 7. Stepping back we feel good about the long term trends of our business even with the Q3 top line challenges discussed. For consumption which is the long term driver of the sales growth, we’ve continued the long term trend of outgrowing categories across our leading portfolio. We outpaced category growth and private label with consumption growth of nearly 2% year-to-date. This performance was affected by softness in certain incidence rates largely in cough/cold and head lice during Q3. Although we did not see a direct impact on sales in the quarter, it is impacting full year consumption and we now anticipate being slightly below our 2% to 3% consumption target for fiscal 2019. Meanwhile, profitability remains strong. We’ve normalized freight and warehouse cost issues previously discussed and the important role out of BC and Goody’s has trended on plan. Profitability continues to translate into consistent in industry leading cash flow allowing us to pay down a $155 million of debt year-to-date. With that let’s turn to slide 8. Even in the challenging retailer and incidence level environment our brands are well positioned for success and this slide is an excellent remainder of that. Our strong brand and diverse portfolio allows us to use a wide variety of brand-building approaches. With number one market share brands representing approximately two-thirds of our sales we’re focused on the end goals of driving category growth. The result of these investments is long term growth for our brands in excess of the categories they compete at. In the drug channel which represents about 25% of our business, we expect ongoing destocking efforts in response to sales trends in industry consolidation. But for these retailers, our brands are adding tremendous value by offering needs based, high ring and innovative products which can help improve traffic and basket size for these retailers. This was evidenced in Q3 where despite destocking efforts our brands outgrew categories meaningfully as well. However, our company continues to benefit from a diverse channel mix with our brands well distributed across other channels including math, food, dollar, convenience and e-commerce. Looking at the graph on the slide, it’s clearer strategy to investment behind brands as yielding results. In these other channels our core brands are going well in excess of categories driven by our time tested brand-building efforts. For example of a brand executing playbook, let’s turn to slide 9 and discuss Nix. The Nix brand was acquired in 2014 as part of our inside acquisition and as a brand that sits well with our long term acquisition criteria. Even in the category like lice treatment, brand-building, new products and innovation are important. It’s an excellent example of the long term success of our brand-building investment strategy, it’s also a timely example since it illustrates the value that our brand can deliver even with incidence level fluctuations and outbreak levels are down almost 5% this year. We’ve achieved success with Nix for many factors. We’ve introduced new products like Nix Ultra which is effective against Super Lice and better positions our brand with consumers and retailers. We’ve also run TV and digital campaigns for Nix to grow awareness with parents and school nurses while concurrently launching an online lice tracker to help these consumers identify when a lice outbreak has occurred. The result of these efforts is that over the last three years Nix has won meaningful additional share of the category while at the same time winning impressive distribution for the brand due to its new product positioning and support strategy. Further, despite sharply lower lice outbreaks in fiscal 2019, we continue to outperform the lice treatment category performance both in Q3 and year-to-date. Let’s turn to slide 10. Compound W is the second of many examples of a strong core brand that has both the history of outperformance and ample runway for future growth. Compound W is one of a few OTC brands that were owned at the formation of the company. It’s a longer term example of winning with the consumer and ultimately with the retailer through brand-building. We became the number one brand in the wart remover category several years and have grown our leading position even further over the last three years expanding our share by nearly six points. As you can see in the chart on the right, Compound W has meaningfully outperformed the category over the last few years with the fastest growth through our brand-building strategy including strong marketing support around new product introduction. Most recent examples of this include a kid bandage offering and the newly launched Nitrofreeze product which offers new extreme freezing technology to provide the highest SKU rate with just one treatment. In conclusion, these two brands are remainder of the opportunity that our portfolio has to drive long term category growth. There is abundant opportunity to utilize consumer insight to drive long term demand which we’ve a history of success way. With that I’ll turn it over to Chris to walk through Q3 financials in greater detail.