Thank you Ed, and thank you all for joining us on today’s call. As Ed noted, we had a strong quarter and continued to opportunistically identify ways to strengthen our balance sheet and improve our profitability. The nontraditional financing methods used to refinance our loans and improve our capital structure this quarter are good examples. Our transaction with the Bulk Trident, as Ed mentioned, in taking delivery of the Bulk PODS and subsequent sale lease back in August provide another source of capital for us. We are also encouraged by our performance during the quarter across several metrics. First, we nearly doubled our adjusted EBITDA at $13.7 million versus $7.4 million for Q2 of 2017. We also reported increases in net revenue from $10.6 million to $18.1 million and net income of $5.8 million from a net loss of $4.7 million in Q2 of 2017. Further, we generated $0.54 in adjusted earnings per share over the last four quarters. To further detail our progress, I’ll now turn to our financials for the second quarter of 2018, which begin on Slide 8 of the presentation. Voyage revenues which are revenues generated from carrying cargo for our clients and represent 85% of our total revenue was $81.1 million for the quarter compared to $80.2 million for the same period of 2017. Charter revenue, which are opportunistic and tied to market rates increased to $15 million from $11.2 million or a 34% increase compared to the second quarter of 2017. This was due to continued improvement in drybulk market rates. Voyages expenses decreased from the second quarter of 2017 by 1% to $38 million. This was driven by the overall decrease in voyage days which was offset by an increase in the average cost of bunkers quarter-to-quarter. The bunker cost per day increased 19% from the three months ended June 30, 2018, to the three months ended June 30, 2017. Charter hire expenses decreased by 7% to $30.7 million compared to $33.2 million for the same period in 2017. And vessel operating expenses increased by approximately 11% to $10 million from $9.1 million over the same time frame. The increase in vessel operating expenses is due to the expansion of our own fleet resulting in a 10% increase in owned and variable charter days, which was 1,820 for the second quarter. Turning to Slide 10, you will see the total number of shipping days decreased by 8% to 4,283 to the three months ended June 30, 2018, compared to 4,661 for the same period in 2017. Although there was a decrease from the comparable quarter, we are encouraged by the increase in number of shipping days from Q1 of 2018 to Q2 of 2018 as total shipping days increased by 21%. As Ed noted, we completed two long-term COAs in Q4 of 2017 and while the first quarter of 2018 was a transitionary quarter, we began to see the impact of redeployments during the second quarter. Turning now to Slide 11, you will see the average TCE rate for the three months ended June 30, 2018, increased by 21% year-over-year to $13,728. This compares to a market average TCE rate of approximately $10,777 meaning Pangaea’s TCE rates are outperforming the average Panamax and Supramax index rates by 27%. Moving on to the balance sheet and cash flows which you will find on Slide 9, unrestricted cash and cash equivalents were $48.9 million as of June 30, 2018, compared to $34.5 million on December 31, 2017. For the three months ended June 30, 2018, the company’s net cash provided by operating activities was $20.8 million compared to $8.3 million for the second quarter of 2017. Net cash used in investing activities was $2.8 million during the second quarter 2018 and $47.7 million during the second quarter of 2017. And finally net cash used in financing activities totaled $4.1 million compared to $44.3 million provided by financing activities during the same period in 2017. I will now turn the call back over to Ed for any additional remarks before we get to the Q&A portion of the call. Ed?