Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Phibro Second Quarter Financial Results Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session, and instructions will be given at that time. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the call over to Richard Johnson. You may begin.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Phibro Animal Health earnings call for our second quarter ended December 2016. On the call today are Jack Bendheim, our Chief Executive Officer; and myself, Richard Johnson. I’m the Chief Financial Officer. We will provide an overview of our quarterly results and then we’ll open the line for your questions. So before we begin, the standard reminders. Let me remind you that the earnings press release and financial tables can be found on the Investors section of our Web site at pahc.com. We’re also providing a simultaneous webcast of the morning’s call, which can be accessed on the Web site as well. Today’s presentation slides and a replay and transcript of the call will also be available on the Web site later today. Our remarks today will include forward-looking statements and actual results could differ materially from those projections. For a list and description of certain factors that could cause results to differ, I refer you to the forward-looking statements section in our earnings press release. Our remarks today will also include references to certain financial measures, which were not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or U.S. GAAP. I refer you to the non-GAAP financial information section on our earnings press release for a discussion of these measures. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures are included in the financial tables that accompany the earnings press release. So now let me turn to Page 4 of the webcast and review the consolidated – sorry. Now let me turn it over to Jack Bendheim for some introductory comments. My bad.

Thanks, Dick. It’s early here in New York. Thank you all for joining us on this call. As I noted in my statement and our earnings release last night, I am very pleased with how our business performed in the December quarter, and in particular the positive momentum in sales growth in our U.S. Animal Health business. As most of you are aware, beginning January 1, 2017, the U.S. Animal Health and ag community in partnership with the FDA has voluntarily given up the use of medically important antibiotics for growth promotion use, though these products remain available for therapeutic uses. While the rule’s change only went into effect on January 1, we saw most of our customers implementing these changes throughout the second half of calendar 2016. Still, due to the strength of our nutritional specialties vaccine offerings, we were able to grow our U.S. Animal Health business in the face of these guidelines as well as the continuing industry response to consumer preferences. Our momentum in the industry is strong as Phibro has increasingly been recognized as the leader in product offerings for animals raised without antibiotics in addition to our leadership in products for conventionally raised animals. Overall, our core Animal Health business grew 2% top line and adjusted EBITDA grew $0.07 as the strength of our U.S. business more than offset weakness we continued to see in the Brazil economy as well as the global dairy market. We have seen some pickup of late in milk pricing although the Brazilian agriculture economy continues to struggle due to the combination of currency, input costs and reduced domestic demand. If this recovery in the dairy industry holds, we are well positioned to benefit with our dairy offerings in the U.S. and overseas as well as we accelerate on nutritional product rollouts. I will now hand it back to Dick to go through the numbers in greater detail. I look forward to taking your questions following his review.

Thanks, Jack. So now onto Page 4 for the consolidated results for the December quarter. Consolidated sales were $192 million for the quarter. That was a slight decrease versus the same quarter last year. The decrease was driven by lower commodity pricing in the Mineral Nutrition segment, while we did see volume growth and revenue growth in the Animal Health segment. Our gross profit was 33.1% of sales and that was an improvement of 110 basis points compared with last year, a $2 million or a 3% improvement over last year. The improvement was due to favorable business and product mix to volume growth to lower raw material costs and improved operating efficiencies, as we continued to see the benefit of recent CapEx investments. And looking at selling, general and administrative expenses on a GAAP basis that line increased $2 million or 5%. However, the current year included $1.7 million of costs related to the partial settlement of our domestic pension plan. We’ve excluded these costs from adjusted EBITDA as a one-time item consistent with our practice of excluding certain items we consider to be unusual or nonrecurring. Excluding that pension settlement costs, SG&A increased about $300,000 or 1% over the prior year. The increase was principally driven by higher business development costs that are included in the corporate piece of our business. So dropping down to adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA was $31.2 million for the quarter, a 2.8 million or 10% increase over the prior year, as all segments of the company contributed to the improvement. And then at the adjusted diluted EPS line, we reported $0.39 per share for the quarter, a $0.02 increase or 5% growth over the prior year. The improvement in adjusted EPS was driven by the growth in adjusted EBITDA partially offset by increased…

Yes. [Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Brandon Folkes of Guggenheim Securities. Your line is open.

Hi, guys. Congratulations on another good quarter. Can you give us some color into what the pushes and pulls could be in the second half of the year? Just reaffirming guidance is great but given the performance in the first half of the year, I think there was potential to take up at least the low end. And then secondly, can you talk about what is driving the volume growth in nutritional specialties and vaccines? Were there any discounting or stocking in the quarter? Thank you.

Let me take the second – it’s Jack. Hi, Brandon. Thank you. Second first. I think the volume growth is basically being established by our positioning and the work we’ve done these last few years of creating products that will help our customers as the consumer demand has moved away from products that have contained antibiotics. As we’ve always said, the animals remain sick or the animals can get sick and you need to help the animals do things that will allow them to be stronger to sort of fight off the disease. None of these things work as well as antibiotics but we need to respond to consumer demand. So we’ve increased our portfolio of product in nutritional and vaccines and we’re seeing the market grow. So we’ve done a very, very good job. As I think I said before, we do not expect this to move as fast as it moves in the consumer side. We obviously expected it to changeover that we spoke about on January 1 on the regulatory side. And I think we’re very, very well positioned to continue our growth. And obviously that was easier to look back but as we look ahead, the next six months or into the future I think we’re very well positioned to have the necessary products to allow our customers to grow into this market share. Why we haven’t changed the guidance, I’d give it to Dick for the hard one.

Yes, first kind of one follow-up to that. It’s kind of a technical question at the end. I forgot the term you used. But there was no --

I think the technical term is loading.

There were no order pattern changes, so this reflects what the animals are eating. There’s no inventory push or pull here. On guidance, I think – we’ve been running well this year. There’s still a number of unknowns, so we’re being cautious on the second half of our year. I think that’s where we’re at on guidance.

Okay, great. And then maybe just one follow up on business development. It looks like you remain active. What are you seeing that preventing you from getting over the line in transactions? Is it still pricing of deals or what is it? Thank you.

So as you see from the capital sheet, we’re increasing our ability to do deals. So it’s not lack of resources. What we’re seeing is really pricing is that assets throughout the classes of what the businesses we’re in, whether it’s vaccines or nutritionals, antibacterials, antibiotics, all remain very, very high, a lot higher than our parent stock. So we want to be cautious. We just don’t want to literally overspend but we continue to look. And the acquisitions we’ve done in the past are sometimes a bit complicated. In order that we can buy more reasonably, it causes us to work a lot harder. But we remain interested in growing the business both organically as well as by acquisition.

Great. Thanks very much and congratulations again on managing this transition so well. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you, Brandon.

Our next question comes from Brett Wong of Tyler Etten Piper Jaffray. Your line is open.

Hi, guys. This is Tyler Etten on for Brett. Thanks for taking my question and good morning. I was wondering if we could talk about Brazil a bit. So what kind of challenges are you seeing in that region considering we’ve been hearing more favorable sentiment out of the region? And I guess what is your outlook for the remainder of the year out of Brazil, or what potential direction it could go?

So first of all, congratulations on a win on Sunday.

Thank you.

I’m surprised you’re on the phone. I imagine that’s why Brett’s out on the street.

[Indiscernible]

Anyway. Brazil has had a – getting back to the business, Brazil has had as we all know and gone through a lot of political and economic prices in the last year, particularly in the ag industry. Due to weather challenges they lost a corn crop. Now Brazil unlike the U.S. has two corn crops a year which gives them a unique ability to have cheap input costs. They didn’t get a lot of rain last year. They did get it this year. So last year the price of corn in Brazil was 2x to 3x higher than the rest of the world. And they can’t easily make up for it by importing corn because of port congestion, infrastructure, et cetera, et cetera. So they had a difficult year in terms of input costs as well as currency and the local economy. So domestic consumption in Brazil was down. Export markets were harder to do, because of their high input costs. That’s getting better now. Again, they had the second crop, so we think it will return. But that’s basically been the driver and if you see it’s true for everybody selling for the ag market in Brazil. This is across the board. This is a problem we’ve all faced last year. We continue to be very bullish on the Brazil market. It’s an ag powerhouse in many ways but we’re being cautious as to when the protein producers will start to see their demand pick up and therefore drive our demand.

Got it, thanks. That’s very helpful. Okay, maybe shifting to the U.S. and specifically the cattle industry. Obviously, margins have compressed this year. Just your thoughts around the cycle as we move through the year and if you’d seen any consumer shifts in what they’re purchasing?

The cattle business in the U.S. is not a huge segment for us. It’s an important segment, a more on amino side. I think we’re seeing more animals on feedlive [ph]. I think they’re think they’re staying on feedlive longer. And just what we’re hearing in [indiscernible] I think they expect to have a decent year in business and I can’t get really – we are not that close to that industry to give you much more in depth.

Okay. And then my follow-up question was going to be and how it compares to the swine market?

I think the swine market remains strong. Exports remain very, very strong. China, which is overall the largest importer around the world of swine have kept their numbers done. So they continue to import. They do shift that around whether to import from the U.S. or from other markets. But China remains a very, very strong market and overall our hog industry is growing and people are putting on more packages in the United States. So we expect that business to continue growing positively.

Great. Thanks. And then just one more, if I can sneak it in. Just your thoughts around when the MSA comps would get easier considering we saw the shift away from the products faster than usual. Just which quarter do you think it would start to flatten out? And that should be all from me. Thanks.

Yes, I think the comps are going to be negative on the domestic side and the comps are going to be negative certainly through June and possibly through September, but somewhere in that range. We’ll see negative year-over-year comps.

Great. Thanks, guys.

Our next question comes from Kevin Kedra of Gabelli. Your line is open.

Thanks for taking the question. I wanted to ask if you’re seeing any shifts in the market given some of the larger consolidation we’ve seen among some of your larger peers. And on the guidance I know you mentioned that it’s basically taking a conservative approach, but did want to nitpick on the interest expense line. Just your guidance at 17 million is certainly above kind of where you’re trending. Is that just a continued conservative look or is there something there we should be thinking about as far as your cash and debt?

So on the guidance piece, we’ve had very cash flow than we expected this year. So we’re seeing interest running below guidance. So I think what we’re running net interest year-to-date is probably what we’re going to run the rest of the year. So we’ll be favorable on that line of the P&L. On the competitive landscape, I’ll let Jack comment.

So I think the consolidation we’ve seen have been a lot more on the companion animal side. I think that’s been the driver. There’s been some shift and when you consolidate and you do change ownership of the production animal side, but it hasn’t really done a lot to sort of get rid of competition. So I think competition remains as always fierce. But again, we’re an industry that’s driven by population, wealth and production growth and we continue to see that. We continue to see that in the U.S. We continue to see that around the world. So the unknown out there I’d say in the poultry side is the Avian Influenza which moves product deduction around but ultimately the consumption around the world of all these proteins continues to grow.

[Operator Instructions]. Our next question comes from Erin Wright of Credit Suisse. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks for taking my questions. Can you speak to the demand trends in dairy both in the U.S. and globally?

I think the global dairy industry has seen pricing recover recently. Pricing in the U.S. for fluid milk was as low as in the $13 and change range. It’s now up to between $16 and $17. So at $13, dairymen were losing money. At the current rate, they’re making some money. They’re certainly back on the black. It’s not the bonanza they had when milk was up into the low $20 range a couple of years ago. So we are seeing improved demand for our products in the dairy industry and in the markets we serve, which are primarily the U.S. and there’s some select international markets where we’re expanding. So I think the dairy industry is it’s not out of the woods yet completely but better than it has been in the recent past.

Okay, great. And then how should we think about the quarterly progression of the vaccine business as we wrap MVP contributions here in the coming quarter?

I think we continue to see double-digit sales growth. It won’t be the 45% of – I can tell you it won’t be the 45% of the December quarter but it will – we’ll continue to have double digits topline growth in vaccines.

And what’s driving that in terms of kind of [indiscernible]? Is it swine versus poultry and kind of what are some of the underlying demand trends that you’re seeing across that business? Thanks.

Yes, it’s both those species. Our vaccine portfolio is fundamentally to those two species, poultry and swine. And we’ve got a good portfolio of products and we’re out there selling more volume both in the U.S. and in a number of international markets.

I think that’s exactly right. I think we also and this is something that we’ve worked on for years and sort of thought about in terms of product development as well as production. When you remove antibiotics – the general use of antibiotics from whether it’s chicken AF [ph] or from the swine bone [ph], there were also diseases people are saying. So there is an increased demand and there’s a preference on the consumer side to see vaccines. So we think we’re well placed to sort of satisfy some of this demand both with our U.S. vaccine business and with our overseas vaccine business. Sorry, and a last little point is that remember we had stopped production in our Israel Beit Shemesh plant in order to upgrade our manufacturing [indiscernible]. So we were shut down for a while, so that overlap we’re seeing will continue as we go ahead over the next – well definitely for this year and into next year as well.

Yes, we had somewhat depressed sales because of supply constraints in the second half of our last fiscal.

Okay, great. Thank you so much.

There are no further questions. I’d like to turn the call over to Richard Johnson for any closing remarks.

All right, everyone, thank you for joining us this morning. And we’ll talk again in another 90 days. Take care. Bye now.