Bill Drew
Analyst · Craig-Hallum Capital Group
Thank you, Omar. Due to the predecessor and successor periods and transaction adjustments for the business combination with One Madison, with convenience of readers we presented the 12-month period ended December 31st 2019. On a combined basis, reflecting a simple, arithmetic combination of the GAAP predecessor and successor periods without further adjustment and also pro forma for constant currency and purchase accounting adjustments, in order to present a meaningful comparison against 2020 results. Machine placement continued its steady and broad based increase, up 12.2% year-over-year to over 117,000 machines globally. Cushioning systems increased 4%. Void-fill installed systems grew 12% while our smallest product line, Wrapping, continues to gain a hold globally, growing really well at north of 35% year-over-year. Overall, net revenue for the company in the fourth quarter was up 13.9% year-over-year on a constant currency basis, driven by strong performance in Europe and APAC. For the quarter, combined revenue in our Europe and APAC reporting division, increased 30% on a constant currency basis, bringing full year 2020 combined revenue in those regions to 18.3% on a constant currency basis. Europe and APAC finished the year with a lot of momentum, experiencing growth across all categories versus the prior year, driven particularly by strength in Void-fill and Wrapping, and an encouraging signs of global industrial activity Cushioning finished at up 5% for the year. North America faced a challenging comparison to the fourth quarter of 2019, which was a record quarter and up a solid 7% versus 2018. Although, topline was down 2% for the quarter and 3.8% for the year, driven by underperformance in Cushioning, we like how North America exited 2020 and laid the groundwork for a more successful 2021. On a consolidated basis, consistent with the seasonality in prior years, Ranpak experienced its highest sales volume in the most profitable quarter of the year in the fourth quarter. Gross margins for the quarter were 42.1% compared to 42.4% in the prior year, as material and overhead were up slightly as a percentage of revenue, and we experienced some freight cost headwinds. Consistent with our communications on previous calls, depreciation expense, which had been a headwind for us through the first three quarters of 2020, came in apples-to-apples comparison in the fourth quarter. Our largest input cost, kraft paper was favorable for us in 2020, but the market has tightened somewhat recently. While pricing on certain grades will be a headwind for us, we are working to offset some of the pricing pressure with a more favorable mix of less expensive grades and new products. As always, we are focused on growth of our topline, but also having a consistent growth profile for our profitability. While there is some near-term pressure, overall, we remain constructive on the supply-demand dynamics in the paper markets. We will closely monitor the situation and take the necessary steps required to maintain our attractive margin profile. To support growth initiatives, SG&A continued to build last year, driven by increasing headcount from approximately 550 to finish the year at 645. As Omar mentioned, we added talent in senior management, sales, operations and finance personnel as well as begin building out our internal automation effort, resulting in an increase of $2.9 million year-over-year for the quarter. As a percentage of revenue, R&D spend for the quarter, was up 44 bps as we continue to invest in development of our product portfolio. For the year, overall R&D spend increased approximately 9%. And given the activity levels, you can expect that pace to accelerate some going into 2021. As expected, the fourth quarter was our largest from a revenue and EBITDA standpoint. We achieved significant operating leverage to finish the year, as fourth quarter pro forma adjusted EBITDA increased 14.6% year-over-year, resulting in an EBITDA margin of 36.6%. This demonstrates the power in the business in the second half of the year, and particularly in the fourth quarter. Moving to the balance sheet and liquidity, we completed 2020 with a strong liquidity position, including a cash balance of $48.5 million and no drawings against our $45 million, revolving credit facility. From an LTM standpoint, this puts our leverage at 3.9 times on a bank adjusted EBITDA basis and using the midpoint of our 2021 guidance implies 3.75 times. Due to our success in deleveraging this quarter, on a net debt basis, we've gone under the threshold, which requires us to make a final additional financing payment to our lender, related to the business combination with One Madison. This is a one-time payment of 1.5% of the initial amounts drawn on our credit facility of approximately $8.2 million, which will be paid out in the next week or so. To be clear, this is a one-time fee to our lender, it will not reduce the principal outstanding on our facility. Overall, we are pleased with the progress on our capital structure in 2020. We eliminated the warrants from our structure on September 22, 2020, and made progress to deleveraging towards the target of 3.0 times leverage. Most recently, in the first quarter, our equity structure was fairly simplified as all 6.85 million earn-out shares surpassed the 20-day trading thresholds required to best. With that, I'll turn it back over to Omar before we move on to questions.