Good morning. And welcome to the Occidental Petroleum Corporation First Quarter Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. (Operator Instructions). Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Chris Stavros. Mr. Stavros, please begin.

Thank you, Emily and good morning, everyone. And thanks for participating in Occidental Petroleum’s first quarter 2014 conference call. On the call with us this morning from Houston are Steve Chazen, Oxy’s President and Chief Executive Officer; Vicki Hollub, Executive Vice President and Head of Oxy’s U.S. Oil and Gas Operations; Cynthia Walker, our Chief Financial Officer; Willie Chiang, Oxy’s Executive Vice President of Operations and Head of our Midstream Business; Bill Albrecht, President of Oxy’s Oil and Gas in the Americas; and Sandy Lowe, President of our International Oil and Gas Operations. In just a moment, I’ll turn the call over to our CFO, Cynthia Walker, who will review our financial and operating results for the first quarter and also provide some guidance for the current quarter. Our CEO Steve Chazen, will then provide an update on the progress of our strategic initiatives and also some comments on the composition of the remaining Oxy after the separation of our California business. Vicki Hollub, will then conclude the call with an update of our activities in the Permian Basin. As a reminder, today’s conference call contains certain projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Federal Securities Laws. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied in these statements and our filings. Our first quarter 2014 earnings press release, the Investor Relations supplemental schedules, and the conference call presentation slides, can be downloaded off of our website at www.oxy.com. I’ll now turn the call over to Cynthia Walker. Cynthia, please go ahead.

Thank you, Chris, and good morning everyone. My comments will reference several slides in the conference call materials that are available on our website. In the first quarter, we’re off to a strong start in our domestic oil growth strategy. Domestic oil production was 274,000 barrels per day, an increase of 4,000 barrels from the fourth quarter of 2013. Overall production was 745,000 boe per day. We had core income of $1.4 billion resulting in diluted earnings per share of $1.75 for the first quarter. This is an improvement over both the prior and year ago quarters. We generated $2.9 billion of cash flow from operations before changes in working capital and repurchased 10.5 million shares ending the quarter with $2.3 billion of cash on our balance sheet. Now, I will discuss the segment performance for the oil and gas business and begin with earnings on slide 3. Oil and gas core earnings for the first quarter of 2014 were $2.1 billion. As you can see, this was essentially flat with the fourth quarter of 2013 and an increase of almost $200 million over the first quarter of 2013. On a sequential quarter-over-quarter basis, we saw improvements from higher domestic realized prices on all of our oil and gas products and higher sales volumes in Columbia, which were offset by lower sales volumes in Iraq. In Columbia, while we recoup liftings in January, which had slipped from the fourth quarter of 2013, in search and activity continues to challenge both our production and listings in our Llanos Norte fields. Production from the fields was shutdown in April. However, now pipeline repair work has begun and we look forward to have normal operations in May. In Iraq, operations were as expected, although liftings continue to be lumpy. We had no liftings…

Thank you, Cynthia. I want to focus on two topics this morning, our progress today in executing strategic initiatives we announced earlier, what our business will look like after the completion of some of these initiatives. Starting with our progress to date, we closed the sale our (inaudible) for pre-tax proceeds of just over $1.3 billion. We sold in the fourth quarter of last year about 25% of interest in Plains pipeline for pre-tax proceeds of $1.4 billion, the remainder interest in Plains is worth over $4 billion at current market prices. We continue to explore options to monetize the remaining interest in the financially efficient manner, once the restrictions on market transaction lapse. We’re continuing to explore strategic alternatives to our P-Ons (ph) assets and decided to keep our interest in the Williston Basin as they are currently more valuable to us for the true-value in the cash asset sale market. We continue to make progress in our discussions with our partners in the Middle East for the sale of a portion of our interest in the region. The separation of our California business from the rest of the company, which will be in the form of distribution of at least 80% of the company’s California stock to Oxy shareholders untracked. And the necessary work is rapidly moving forward. We expect to file initial Form 10 in June, announced California management team in the third quarter. Completion and separation of California is expected to occur in the fourth quarter of this year. We have repurchased more than 20 million of the company’s shares since the announcement of our strategic initiative in the fourth quarter of 2013, of which 10.5 million shares were purchased in the first quarter of 2014, 26.5 million shares remain in our current repurchase program which…

Thank you, Steve. This morning I will update you on the activities to date in our Permian resource business, where we’re off to a good start in 2014. In the first quarter, Permian resources produced 67,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day, an increase of 5% over the fourth quarter of 2013. Capital expenditures were $328 million, was approximately 75% spent on drilling and completing company operated wells. The average 22 rigs during the quarter, of which 15 more horizontal rigs, this allowed us to drill 67 wells, including 25 horizontal. About three fourth of the 25 horizontals are currently on production. As I indicated in the last call, we have two main goals for our Permian Resources business in 2014. First, continue evaluating the potential across our full acreage position and second, pilot development strategies to optimize their ultimate returns. Today I’ll focus on the progress we made in areas where we are targeting the Wolfcamp Shale, and one where we are targeting primarily the Bone Spring. Those areas are at South Curtis Ranch and Dora Roberts Ranch in the Midland Basin, (inaudible) and the Texas Delaware Basin and South East New Mexico. These make up the core of our horizontal program thus far. Our Wolfcamp activity in the Midland Basin is focused in two operating areas, South Curtis Ranch and Dora Roberts Ranch, where we have identified about 800 drilling locations. In the Wolfcamp we brought 12 wells on production during the quarter and now have a total of 18 producing wells. Although, one of these wells are completed in the Wolfcamp B, the others completed in the Wolfcamp A, the initial production rate through averaging around 750 boe per day. While this is a good start, we believe we can improve on this result by increasing the…

Thank you, Vicki. Emily, we’re now ready to pull for questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions). And our first question is from Doug Leggate of Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead. Doug Leggate – Bank of America Merrill Lynch: Thanks, good morning everybody. Steve, I wonder if I could take a couple please. First of all, thanks for all the disclosure on the share buyback plan. But there was obviously fairly large omission from the discussion which is MENA on the differential proceeds from MENA. So, I’m wondering if you could give us an update as to where that process stands and how that may impact the buyback plan also? And then I have a follow-up on the Permian, please.

Yes, I think we continue to make progress in it from both parties that are, or both groups or parties if you want to think of it that way, that are involved, and rather than speculate on the amount we will just say that would increase perhaps materially the share buyback program. But I think it’s not helpful at this point with the parties to speculate on what the amount might be. Doug Leggate – Bank of America Merrill Lynch: I understand. Could you maybe help us a little bit with the time line, because obviously, one of the things that we have talked about backwards and forwards is whether or not you would be prepared to sort of pre-fund the debt for California and buy back shares or are you going to wait until that process is complete? So, when you consider Plains as well is, this kind of an 18-month kind of time line that you are talking about for the buyback or would you be inclined to accelerate it?

We’ll just see how the stock responds. If we see an opportunity, we could accelerate it. If not, we will wait. But you should expect continued reduction in the share count through the rest of this year, and into next year. Doug Leggate – Bank of America Merrill Lynch: Okay. My follow-up is really kind of related, I guess, because you’ve given us an idea what the free cash flow could look like for the residual company. And obviously, it would seem that even with this step-up in spending in the Permian, you’re still going to have substantial free cash available, especially from this business. So I guess what I’m kind of thinking are what are your plans on a go forward basis? The Permian is going to grow but would you expect the growth per share would be the kind of metric and the buybacks to become a more ratable piece or are the acquisitions in the Permian something that is still appealing to you over time? And I will leave it there. Thanks.

Yes. On the acquisitions right now, it is really not accretive. Generally speaking, the public markets are way ahead of the cash markets. The public markets could be right and the cash markets could be wrong. But right now I don’t find acquisitions to be particularly interesting and we’re not doing anything that is dilutive. So I think as far as acquisitions, I think that’s unlikely. As we look forward, in our cash flow, we expect our earnings per share, fees starting with the current levels, to continue to grow. We hope it will grow this year, and we expect it to grow going forward. We expect our cash flow per share, if you want to use that metric, to continue to grow and we expect the dividends to grow. Share repurchase, I think for the next several years, I doubt if the company will need to do a large scale, any kind of major acquisitions. I mean there are always little pieces to be picked up. But I think the company will continue to use the cash flow to grow dividends where it’s predictable cash flow growth and to repurchase shares where it is less predictable. Some modest debt reduction to go with the smaller scale of business. But that’s – I think what people should expect, they should expect better earnings, better returns on invested capital, they should expect some continued reduction in the share count, at a modest, more modest rate after this process is done and growing dividends. Doug Leggate – Bank of America Merrill Lynch: I appreciate that. Thanks, Steve.

Our next question is from Paul Sankey of Wolfe Research. Please go ahead. Paul Sankey – Wolfe Research: Good morning, everyone. Thanks for making the effort to get on the call all of you. Steve, could you just talk a little bit more about the decision to pull the Bakken sale, the process around that and what your plans are for that business going forward? Thanks.

Yes, we’re not doing wealth destructive divestitures. So, if we got a price that was sort of comparable the way we trade, I think that’s one thing. But the cash market is just simply not that strong right now. And so our plan, it makes around 20,000 a day of production. We restarted our development program. And so, I think it will grow modestly over the next year or two. We don’t have – and we’ll just see what the markets give us going forward. I’m sort of – we could either grow it or we could divest, but right now, the cash just doesn’t get the kind of proceeds that we think are intrinsic in the business. Paul Sankey – Wolfe Research: Could you remind us why you wanted to sell it?

The scale. It is 20,000 a day, the scale was below what we’ve been wanting. We probably need about a 40,000 or 50,000 a day business. The business has actually done better on an operational perspective over the last year, than it had done historically. And so I think its sub optimal scale. Perhaps at some point in the future there might be an opportunity to merge it in with somebody else. But right now, I think we’ll just keep it there. It’s not doing any – it may be doing some modest good, and not doing any harm right now. Paul Sankey – Wolfe Research: I guess the obvious follow-up is that if you’re not seeing the right prices to sell stuff, wouldn’t you want to buy stuff there to get up your scale?

If there was stuff at the same price. The market is not – it’s not a robust market. And so the companies trade for much more than relative basis than people offered us for the asset. So, what they were trying to do is do accretive acquisitions for their company I’m sure but with multiple differences – difference. Paul Sankey – Wolfe Research: Yes. And then just to finish up on that and that will be it for me on slide 11, just to finish up on that particular paragraph, could you talk a little bit more about the P-Ons, as well because it’s this does explore strategic alternatives. I wonder what is worth and I’ll leave it there? Thank you.

Yes, on the P-Ons, we’re in discussions with a private party to create a joint venture. They have a fair amount of interest in the P-Ons, we have a fair amount of the current plan as to put them together, run them as a private business for a while and then at some point in the future they would have enough scale to go public. Paul Sankey – Wolfe Research: Thank you.

Our next question is from Leo Mariani of RBC. Please go ahead. Leo Mariani – RBC: I just wanted to follow-up a little bit on some of these asset sales. I appreciate some of the color here but could you give us a little bit more color potentially on timing of sort of the rest of the Plains GP, when you think that might exit the portfolio? A and then I guess I think there were maybe some other small U.S. non-core assets, wasn’t sure if you guys were still selling some other little things here that might be off the table as well?

There is always small things for sale but nothing that’s moved the needle a lot. The Plains thing, I think it expires at the end of the year, toward the end of the year, and we will be looking to see what we can do early next year. Leo Mariani – RBC: Okay. And I guess just in terms of the Permian, you guys are creeping up the horizontal rig count, 17 now, it is like going to 18, I think you said, another quarter or two. And can you just give us maybe a better sense of where maybe that could get to you over the next couple of years? Do you have kind of a multi-year kind of rig ramp planned on the horizontal side in the Permian, any color on that would be appreciated?

Vicki would be glad to talk about that.

We expect to double our rig count from this year, and two years, to double, so going from the 23 peak that we will have this year to possibly 46 in 2016. For horizontal rigs, this year, as you know, as you just said, in Q3, we will be going to 18 horizontal rigs and expect to end the year, this year with about 21 horizontal rigs. We’ll increase that from the end of the year 21, going up toward 2016. We don’t have an exact number as to what the horizontal rig count will be of that total but we expect it to be about double. Leo Mariani – RBC: Okay, that’s helpful. And I guess you guys specifically kind of highlighted this Barilla Draw acreage here in your slide. I just want to get a sense of kind of how much acreage that is in total and maybe you could just talk a little bit more about sort of the areas of the Midland that you think are kind of the most prospective in terms of the total acreage size there?

In the Texas Delaware, I can talk about basically what we expect our well potential to be. It’s going to be in that area, we expect to drill over 1,000 Wolfcamp wells, depending on the productivity of some of the benches that we have yet to test. So this is, the over 1,000 is based on the benches that we feel pretty comfortable with today. That would be in that Barilla Draw area plus the surrounding acreage. So, that would be for all of Texas Delaware. Leo Mariani – RBC: All right. And I guess just also, similar question on the Midland, you highlighted a number of kind of small kind of acreage parcels here, sort of in largely Martland and Midland and some in hector. Just want to get a sense that there is kind of, an acreage number that you guys could kind of throw out there in the Midland in terms of what you think is kind of the high graded stuff that’s most prospective for horizontal drilling?

In the Midland Basin, we expect that the acreage that we have listed there for the three areas that we show, we expect our prospective acreage to be about that, for the Midland Basin from what we know today, from the appraisal work that we are currently doing. Leo Mariani – RBC: Okay. Thanks, that’s helpful.

Our next question is from Roger Read of Wells Fargo. Please go ahead. Roger Read – Wells Fargo: Good morning.

Good morning. Roger Read – Wells Fargo: A lot of this stuff has been hit. If we could talk a little bit about the share repurchase pace again, you’ve mentioned several times where there is flexibility in terms of the pace of share repo. Maybe give us an idea assuming California goes out, on the schedule, you expect, the way you think about it, is it stock price driven. Is it cash flow on hand? Is it combination of the two and getting back to the earlier question about would you be willing to put the balance sheet to work here?

It’s stock price driven. Roger Read – Wells Fargo: Just that simple?

That simple. Roger Read – Wells Fargo: Okay. Well, that’s helpful. And then in the Permian, obviously, I understand everything going on in the spending front here, could you talk a little bit about the infrastructure you need. We’ve heard from various sources that some of the challenges are more in the gathering systems than in the trunk line systems. Kind of how you’re addressing that issue?

Maybe, we’ll let Willie, to talk about – we’re a large gatherer in the basin. Maybe we could talk a little bit about our gathering system in the Permian.

Sure. We really haven’t had too much problems in getting the gathering done. The big challenge, as you’ve seen is really the trunk lines which we think is going to resolve itself here with the startup of our BridgeTex pipeline later this quarter, early third quarter. So, from the infrastructure piece on gathering. Roger Read – Wells Fargo: Okay, well, I guess one of the questions along that along is if you are having issues with crude versus condensate versus gas handling, and then maybe what your spending will do on that front, and are we going up in concert with the rig count, or something more or less?

Yes, we may be looking at some more gas processing facilities, but on the natural gas side, we feel it’s adequate.

We’ve got a big gathering system, so we will probably have more flexibility maybe than somebody who doesn’t have their own gathering system. Willie, how many miles of gathering system do you have, roughly?

We’ve got close to 3,000 miles of pipe, for the Permian.

Permian. So, we’re a big gatherer not just of our own but other people’s crude and we may have more flexibility than maybe some of the smaller producers. Roger Read – Wells Fargo: Okay. Thank you.

Our next question is from Sven Del Pozzo of IHS. Please go ahead. Sven Del Pozzo – IHS: Yes, hello. Wanted to – what’s your take on macro forecast for California gas because we’re – and I know you guys have those fields you bought from Benaco Rosetta. So you must be one of the biggest, potentially have the biggest fields for gas. And also those older discoveries you had, I don’t know, 6, 7 years ago that were gas and condensate, that I’m not sure if you got around to developing them because gas prices were not strong enough. So, what is your take on the local gas market in California and how you might use your gas assets to take advantage of that?

Right now we have a lot of gas potential in the state. We could increase our gas production substantially. Right now, the oil drilling has got significantly better margins, and significantly better returns. If that changes, gas prices go up some more, some of our stuff I’m sure is economic in the 4.00, 4.50 area but just not as economic as $100 oil. And so, I think right now, we’ll keep our gas drilling modest in California, but clearly, when a California company is separate, they could take a different view of this and maybe have somewhat different return standards than we do. Sven Del Pozzo – IHS: All right. So then the gas production drop we saw in California sequentially from the fourth quarter to the first quarter is that – what kind of a decline is that? Could you consider that a base decline or you said it is going to flatten out now in the second quarter. So, I’m just trying to get a feel of how those – what the legacy decline rate of those gas assets might be, if you stop drilling?

Yes. We’re pretty much stopped. So, Vicki can answer the rest of it.

Some of the decline of our gas assets was in excess of 25%, and that’s why we made the switch to move to more towards some of our conventional EOR projects and water floods. We’ve had some gas declines that were actually greater than 30% as well. So we’re trying to lower that decline and we’ve now been able to lower the decline of Elk Hills over the past few years by switching more towards our heavier liquids drilling and development. Sven Del Pozzo – IHS: Well, thank you. And then, one last question. When you mentioned the Permian unit, if I’m correct and repeating what you said, I think you said you spend about 1.6 billion to drill and complete about 340 wells. Was that a gross number, that’s in 2014, was that a gross number and if so, could we get a net number?

Currently, the number of wells is a gross number, and the capital is a net number. We don’t quite have here in front of us the net number on the wells. Sven Del Pozzo – IHS: And the gross number doesn’t include the third party wells?

Right. Sven Del Pozzo – IHS: Gross operated?

Yes, those are gross operated and the capital is sort of a mix. And but it doesn’t include the non-operated wells because we don’t know what that will be. Sven Del Pozzo – IHS: Okay. All right, all right. Thank you.

Our next question is from Ed Westlake of Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Ed Westlake – Credit Suisse: Hi, yes, good morning. Yes, I just wanted to get a little bit more color on how you see the Permian developing. You’ve given us some extra disclosure on the Midlands. You got 40,000 acres there, plus you say you could double or 80,000. You’ve given us a 1,000 locations as the number for Barilla (ph) Draw. And then you got this large sort of acreage position in New Mexico. I guess the concern people have is that as you accelerate the rig counts, you guys don’t have as much inventory as some of the say pure plays in the region. So I’m just trying to get a sense of where, apart from what you’ve disclosed today we should be thinking would be the growth area in your existing organic portfolio? Vicki can answer that, I think better than I can, but we’ve disclosed how many acres we have that’s prospective and we just highlighted the areas in this call that are going to affect the production over the next 2 or 3 quarters. It wasn’t intended as what might be there for the next 20 years. But I think Vicki can probably answer better than I can.

Yes, we have close to 2 million in prospective acres in our Permian resources business unit and currently we’ve identified over 4,400 well locations to drill. So we’re not short on inventory yet because we’re still in the process of evaluating some of the other benches, too. So, we expect the well location number to go up with time. Ed Westlake – Credit Suisse: And I guess that, just to be clear again, that 4,400 or 4,500, that’s the net locations operated or what’s the definition of that? So we can compare that apples with apples.

That’s the gross operated well locations. Ed Westlake – Credit Suisse: Okay. So, that would compare with the 340, sort of give about 13 year inventory.

Yes, that’s correct. Ed Westlake – Credit Suisse: Right. And so, I guess, I’m trying to think about what’s the upside to that in terms of what percentage of the acreage you have drilled out as you think about that sort of 4,500 acres?

I think the important thing to remember for us is that with wells, horizontal wells we’ve drilled to date, we’ve really only drilled about 1% of our potential. So if you look at these kind of plays, normally that well count goes up significantly over time as you get to the other benches to appraise those. So, I think our estimate right now is conservative based on what we have available to evaluate and expect that number to continue go up as we learn more. Ed Westlake – Credit Suisse: Okay, great. And then, specific question on Barilla Draw. I mean, you’ve got 88% liquids, just a sense of how much of that NGLs and how much of that is condensate. IPs are looking good but just trying to get a sense of the liquid mix? Thank you.

72% of that is oil. Ed Westlake – Credit Suisse: And do you know the API of the oil, is it?

I think it’s in the 30% to 35% range. Ed Westlake – Credit Suisse: Okay, good. Thank you very much.

Our next question is from Pavel Molchanov of Raymond James. Please go ahead. Pavel Molchanov – Raymond James: Thanks for taking the question. Steve, we saw in the last several months, City of Carson, LA County, a few other jurisdictions in California have been putting up proposals, anti-fracking, some cases, anti-drilling?

No LA County. So, it’s a City of Los Angeles. Pavel Molchanov – Raymond James: Okay, City of Los Angeles. So, your talks on the trends, if there were trends?

Well, I think it’s a fair way to describe that it’s basically supposedly regulated by the State of California, that’s where the laws were setup in California, not regulated by every town. To the extent that towns don’t want us there, we won’t be there. We’ve got lots of acreage in California, there is lots of counties and towns that would like us there, want the jobs. Some of these places that don’t want us have very high unemployment rates. And if they don’t want us there, it’s just fine. So far, these areas are not significant portions of our total position in California. They’re some relatively small positions, they’re being stirred up by people who don’t like oil and gas. And so, I think one of the California company is up and running, one of their major tasks will be to – and major focus would be on dealing with political issues in California. But noise, is sort of what California produces, the political guy wants to talk about fracking or something, that’s certainly no one you think about it. And just for the completeness, I think the Beverley Hills City Council voted of our fracking within the borders of the City of Beverley Hills. Now, initially I thought I misunderstood what they were saying and then they were kind of outlaw their most important export product. But actually I don’t – there are wells that have been proposed to be fracking in the wells or they were, I think there is one field there that’s been there for about 50 years. These are – they’re just politicians trying to make some good statement, maybe to people in Beverly Hills that parked their Rolls Royce’s and drive bicycle going forward. Pavel Molchanov – Raymond James: Good. And just one more quick one in California. When you referred to the $5 billion?

You can see why I’m not going to be part of the California Company. Pavel Molchanov – Raymond James: I understood. When you referred to the $5 million of funded debt in the income, is that effectively going to be structured as a dividend $5 billion dividend to the parent?

Yes. Pavel Molchanov – Raymond James: Okay, appreciate it.

Thank you.

Our next question is from John Harlan of Societe Generale. Please go ahead. John Harlan – Societe Generale: Yes, thanks. Some quick ones, how much in the Permian, how much incremental costs are the ASPs for you?

Obviously, I’m not going to answer that one, so Vicki is going to answer it.

I’m going to just be honest, I’ll have to take a guess on this. I haven’t looked specifically at that number recently. But I believed it would be about $35,000 to $40,000 incremental over the gas lift, it could be a little bit more than that. John Harlan – Societe Generale: Okay. Steve, when you were in New York, you said that you thought you were top cortile in terms of your drilling and completion work in the unconventional Permian is that improving at all with subsequent wells drilled?

Yes, I think so. But I think we’ll stay with the top cortile for now. We’ve got more to do. I think that things are getting better, our overall costs we didn’t say it actually, overall cost of the company are 9% better than the comparable wells drilled from last year and so far this year. So, I think we’re getting better. But we’ve still got more to do, more cost to be saved, better completion techniques, I think Vicki has been pretty forth right about, what she wants to accomplish in that. So, I think there is more to do, just good, it will never improve, continuous improvement that will never end. John Harlan – Societe Generale: Great. Last one from me is, the dividend for Oxy remain curve, are you going to hold it flat or go down a little bit for the spin curve?

No, it’ll go up, it’ll go up. John Harlan – Societe Generale: Okay.

The dividends, the way this thing is set up, there is a dividend from the post California company, company will be able to increase its dividends at a reasonable pace going forward. And the goal is not to have it reduce its dividend or hold it flat like some others have done, people should expect the same kind of increases, the percentages maybe different but the same kind of increases that they’ve enjoyed in the past. John Harlan – Societe Generale: Okay. Last one from me is on Fibro, are you going to monetize that or what’s the story?

Yes, they are out, we would like to buy it. I think it’s available. So, their outlook talking to investors who want to do the credit support for Fibro. But in any case, their book is declining over the next couple of quarters. John Harlan – Societe Generale: Okay, thank you.

Thanks.

That concludes our question-and-answer session. I’d like to turn the conference back over to Chris Stavros for any closing remarks.

Thanks for joining us on the call today. And please give us a call in New York if you have any further questions. Thanks.

Thanks.