Good morning, and welcome to the Blue Owl Capital's First Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. During the presentation, your lines will remain on listen-only mode. Later on we will have a question and answer session. [Operator Instructions] I'd like to advise all parties that this conference call is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Anne Dai, Head of Investor Relations for Blue Owl. Please go ahead.

Thanks, operator, and good morning to everyone. Joining me today are Marc Lipschultz, Co-Chief Executive Officer; and Alan Kirshenbaum, our Chief Financial Officer. I'd like to remind our listeners that remarks made during the call may contain forward-looking statements, which are not a guarantee of future performance or results and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that are outside the company's control. Actual results may differ materially from those in forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those described from time to time in Blue Owl's capital filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement. We'd also like to remind everyone that we'll refer to non-GAAP measures on the call, which are reconciled to GAAP figures in our earnings presentation, available on the Investor Resources section of our website at blueowl.com. Please note that nothing on this call constitutes an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase an interest in any Blue Owl fund. This morning, we issued our financial results for the first quarter of 2024, reporting fee-related earnings, or FRE of $0.20 per share; and distributable earnings, or DE, of $0.17 per share. We also declared a dividend of $0.18 per share for the first quarter payable on May 30 to holders of record as of May 21. During the call today, we'll be referring to the earnings presentation, which we posted to our website this morning. So please have that on hand to follow along. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to March.

Great. Thank you very much, Ann. We reported another strong quarter of results for Blue Owl this morning with 12 straight quarters in consecutive management fee and FRE growth since we've been a public company. We're very pleased with the predictable, consistent and robust growth we've been able to generate for our shareholders across a range of market backdrops, reflecting the benefits of our FRE-centric and permanent capital heavy business model. Said plainly, our earnings consists almost entirely of management fees, so we're not subject to the volatility and uncertainty of revenues tied to realized gains and capital markets activity. And having long-duration capital means that very little use of our system, providing us with a resilient asset base that grows faster than our peer group for the same number of dollars rates. We think the market is starting to understand and appreciate the value of these stabilized attributes and how they contribute to our premium growth profile. On a 12-month year-over-year basis, we grew FRE revenue and FRE by 24% and DE by 20%. We're humbled to be among the leaders in these metrics across our whole peer group that includes very accomplished firms in our industry and it's something we don't take lightly as we continue to plant the seeds for future growth at Blue Owl. Globally, demand for differentiated income-driven returns remains very strong, and we continue to see good interest in our credit, GP's strategic capital and real estate strategies across institutional and wealth investors. During the quarter, we held the final close on our latest triple net lease fund, bringing in nearly $500 million. We raised $5.2 billion total after receiving approval to exceed our hard cap of $5 billion. This fund was the largest U.S. focused real estate fund in 2023 and more than…

Thank you, Marc. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. To start off, we are pleased with the strong results we continue to report with the first quarter of 2024 being our 12th consecutive quarter every quarter since we listed of both management fee and FRE sequential growth, the only public alternative asset manager that has demonstrated this over this period. We've been able to achieve this because of our differentiated asset base and earnings profile with long-duration assets creating a recurring revenue profile while fundraising adds new layers to our layer cake of management fees and FRE. So let's go through some of the key highlights on an LTM year-over-year basis through March 31. Management fees are up 22% and 92% of these management fees are from permanent capital vehicles. FRE is up 24%, and our FRE margin is right on top of our 60% target and DE is up 20%. As you can see on Slide 12, we raised $4.7 billion in the first quarter and $16.7 billion for the last 12 months. Inclusive of debt capital, new capital raised was over $28 billion over the last 12 months. I'll break down the first quarter fundraising numbers across our strategies and products. In credit, we raised $3 billion, $2.6 billion was raised in our diversified and first lien lending strategies, of which $1.3 billion was raised in our non-traded BDC, OCIC, up over 100% compared to the first quarter of 2023. The remainder was raised across software lending and our newly launched strategic equity, strategy. In GP Strategic Capital, we held an initial close of approximately $600 million for our new mid-cap strategy. In real estate, we raised approximately $1 billion with nearly $500 million for the sixth vintage drawdown fund, bringing that fund to its…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Alex Blostein from Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.

Alex, we can't hear you.

Really nicely. You highlighted that, I think, in your prepared remarks as well. Can you pull back the layers a little bit and talk through sort of sources of increased sales? Is it same platforms, addition of new platforms? To what extent is it also including some broadening of the existing FA base within the platforms that you're already on? So just to kind of help us frame how to run rate the current pace of sales on a go-forward basis.

Alex, the very beginning of that, we didn't hear. Can you just repeat the very beginning, please? Apologies.

Sorry. Yes. So I was just asking about the wealth channel trends you guys are seeing so far in the second quarter. It looks like April 1 subscriptions were really strong. So I was hoping to get a little bit more detail around the sources of strength in terms of new products or new platforms rather or sort of expanding footprint within the existing platforms and how to think about the run rate on a forward basis.

Absolutely. Thank you, Alex. So wealth has been and continues to be strong. You obviously know our position, which, of course, is now coming up on taking nearly a decade to build this sort of platform, we really have a great embedded position with some products, which are growing, as you say, sort of by expansion of the usage in a platform. And then we have products that we have introduced that are growing by expansion of platforms. So actually, we see both when you look at our results in wealth. So in credit in our core income, in our tech income products, what we're really seeing there is increased adoption. That is more FAs and more clients using the product. So this is the virtuous circle we're on a lot of platforms and we've delivered great results for those investors. And so we have more FAs understanding how this is a really effective part of essentially a core allocation, and our product works really well for them. And so in the case of credit, I think you're seeing primarily the growth of user increases, more FAs, more customers. And of course, the beauty of that is this is still so limited in its penetration. When you really dive into the details, which obviously, we do on what's really being sold in the platform, how many people are using it how many clients does each FA that uses it and have involved, you get very excited about forward look in this opportunity set, which you can also see from the macro numbers when we just look at penetration of alts in general versus this very, very large world called retail, call it private wealth or you want to slice it. So we're seeing the virtuous circle of being a market…

Next question comes from Brennan Hawken from UBS. Your line is now open.

We've heard a bit more recently about spread compression in private lending markets. So I was hoping to hear your perspective on what you're seeing on the ground. And if we are seeing some spread compression, what you think that might mean as far as the outlook for FRPR that's begun to come through on the P&L for you?

Absolutely. So look, spreads -- so let's start with this. Yes, there's been spread compression, point of fact. There was spread expansion a year ago, 1.5 years ago. Before that, spreads were tighter. I look over the long arc of time that we have done now about $100 billion or so in originations. And it's no doubt the case that spreads go up and spreads come down. The key to our business is something really distinctive about private credit done right. Again, we are deeply focused on credit, credit, credit, principal preservation, downside protection and strong income results. And that has worked. We're running at a 7 basis point realized loss rate. So everything about doing this strategy, right, growing our business, which, of course, grows our fee-based is about delivering on the credit promise where we have been best of breed. And so the key to us, unlike many alternative products, let's call them the high octane products were vintage is a big question, you get in at the right time to get out at the right time great returns. But see, if you get into the wrong equity product in 2021 and now you're sitting here today with a couple of years just dead time behind you, you're probably going to struggle with returns. The big difference for us is unlike kind of entry moment in entry and exit moment. I think about this more as a box, a range, a ban. The key is, do we have really strong credits and are we getting an attractive return, attractive spread for those credits? And here's the good news on the corollary to our spreads compressed, have compressed. Is it attractive? Absolutely. Absolutely. The credit that we are seeing and the return you're earning, Remember, we're in a 532, 90-day LIBOR. So when you take spreads, it's I prefer the 100 basis points wider spreads than we were seeing 1.5 years ago. But the spreads we're seeing today aren't that different from what we saw 3 years ago, and those were really attractive loans and returns too. So I'm not being dismissive, we'll always prefer a higher spread, but that isn't. What matters to us is a band in which we're earning a very good return for a very moderated risk. And we're certainly operating in that band and feel good about it. As to FRPR, I mean we're in a pretty tight band, but I'll turn that over to Alan.

Thank you, Marc. Brennan, I guess what I would add to that is a few things. We continue to expect to see our Part 1 fees coming up quarter-over-quarter, year-over-year as we go through 2024. There's a series of reasons for that. One, Marc just touched on the very strong fundraising we continue to see in our non-traded products like CIC and TIC. We continue to deploy good capital in products like OTF 2. So as we continue to deploy fundraise, we're going to continue to see strong increases in Part 1 fees. Also, if you go back to the end of last year, where the SOFR curve was and where it is today, throughout, let's say, 2024, we're still averaging let's say, 20 basis points or 30 basis points higher. And in 2025, where the curve is, we are 60 basis points to 80 basis points higher today than where we were back in December. So we will continue to see strong returns on our Part 1 fees, at least we would expect to because of all these things.

Our next question comes from Glenn Schorr from Evercore ISI. Your line is now open.

Big picture question on credit. Obviously, direct lending, you're an animal, you're expanding in health care infrastructure. You got expanding real estate lending and Kuvare brings investment grade. Yet, I'm still going to ask the question of, do you feel like you have enough across private credit broadly? And maybe that's just really a question on what do you already have in asset-backed finance and what's your plan in terms of expanding there?

Thanks, Glenn. And it's a great question. First, I want to reinforce, we indeed consider ourselves credit animals. Thank you for that. I like that one. With regard to the range of offerings, you characterize well, we certainly have built out adjacencies that take us from diversified direct lending, that led us, of course, a long time ago now to understanding the great merits of software lending, which has really worked it led us to first lien lending another derivative thereof that's really worked. We now have, as you point out, with our new acquisitions with Prima. We add -- it's very strong rated real estate oriented debt at a time when that market is deeply disrupted with Kuvare. We add, of course, other adjacent investment grade or stronger credit derivative opportunities. So we definitely have widened that range and we like that. To answer your question very spot on, we have some parts of alternative credit very strongly. -- as we've commented, but I'll share the skin, beneath the surface, we actually do a lot of lending in areas people don't particularly share of our large business may not focus on, but we have developed very strong skills in railcar leasing -- in aircraft leasing in ABL finance with Wingspire in life settlements in royalties in health care, as you pointed out, we've done about $13 billion of loans. So there's a lot we have built organically, and we will continue to utilize that capability for both our diversified products and over time as appropriate in other specialized or asset-backed products. So we have the organic tools. Are there other areas to put it rhetorically, that we could add in an alternative credit or asset-based credit, absolutely true. So we continue to look at build, buy and they're neither mutually exclusive nor mutually required, which is to say we've got a lot of tools to be successful in asset-based finance. We would be perfectly open to and interested in adding more tools and we have our eyes open for that.

Our next question comes from Steven Chubak from Wolfe Research. Your line is now open.

Now that you've added both real estate debt and insurance capabilities to the platform, I was hoping you could just speak to your confidence level in hitting or approaching the dollar dividend in 25, it might be helpful to outline the road map similar to actually, Alan, how you laid it out last earnings call, just given the building block should look a little bit different than before.

Yes. Yes, thank you. Look, it is our favorite topic, as we talk about all the time, which is continued path to the dollar dividend. And sitting here today, we continue to feel the same way. We are moving right forward being in and around that dollar. And every quarter where we march forward up into the right to quote, I think, Glen's title or the Blue Street continues, I think, to use yours. We move a quarter closer and the band effectively gets tighter. When we complete steps of these, and it's not enormously complicated ladder or set of steps. But when we get things done, like this quarter, we said, look, we expect it will include strategic acquisition as part of it. We did two this last quarter. We expect we'll take other BDCs or some of them public over time. We did that with BDC, which is trading really well. And meantime, BDC trades at a premium to book. So we're slowly ticking it off in the sort of I'm going to compile and I'll also add Brennen's title as well. We think we are the boring Blue Street moving up and to the right. So I think I've merged with proper attribution, 3 titles together. And that the destination, the goal is to get to that dollar, and we continue to feel good about being in and around that level. So let me turn it over to Alan to give you the building blocks to go with that.

We are on track to be in or around the $1 share. I'm going to approach this in 2 ways, if that's okay. I just want to remind everyone, we have a significant amount of embedded earnings power in our business. We have about $1 billion of revenues that would, over the course of 3 different things that would bring our 2023 revenues up over 60%. And so that $1 billion of revenues is about a quarter of that $240 million is just deploying the AUM that has not yet earning fees that we've already raised. We've got over $200 million in BDC step-up fees, of which to Marc's 80 we just turned on earlier this quarter in January. And those 2 items alone, that's almost $0.5 billion, that's over a 25% increase to our 2023 revenues. Then when you add fund raise for just our GP Stakes 6 product and our 2 BDC non-traded products, that's another $600 million over the course of this year and next year that would increase revenues by over 60%. We -- but to narrow in now on the $1 a share. So Marc has already talked about a number of things. There's a lot of exciting things we're working on. Almost all of those, as I think we've all talked about in the past are actually dilutive to the dollar share. That's us putting dollars back into the business to focus on keeping our industry-leading growth beyond the dollar share beyond 2025. There's just 3 things now. So last quarter, there were 4 things we needed to do. Now there's 3 things we need to do to get in and around that $1 a share. Marc touched on the fourth, which fell away now. We've done an accretive transaction. We've done too. And so we check that off. That's done. So there's 3 things left. And on my scorecard, at least, when I think of those 3 things, we've got fundraise for our non-traded products at CIC, TIC and Oren. And as we just talked about in the earlier question, we are certainly on track and doing very well towards achieving what we need to in fund rates for our non-traded products. So I checked that as on track. Fundraise for GP Stakes 6. We continue to get a lot of interest in that product, and we expect fundraising to go very well there. We expect to hit our $13 billion target. So I consider that on track as well. And then the third of the 3 items left is to list 1 of the 2 software lending BDCs. And I won't comment on timing for either of those. But we continue to think that there's something to do there over the course of this year or next year. So we are tracking very well to be in and around that $1 a share for 2025.

Our next question comes from Craig Siegenthaler from Bank of America. Your line is now open.

I think they got my last name better on your call than the last one. So my question is on M&A. You've added real estate debt and insurance just this year. And I think this morning, the FT is citing infrastructure as the next lightly white space. So I wanted to get your updated thoughts on M&A and real specifically, what do you think of infrastructure equity and infrastructure debt?

Sure. So let me just take one step back and frame our business has a very, very clear DNA, right? We focus on a being very deep in an adjacent and tightly bound sound of products. And we've talked about this about for before, but there's different strategies. There's the -- all directions on the Compass strategy and many of our very successful peers pursue that strategy, picture what we're doing as a northbound highway. It's got a lot of lanes. In the lanes we occupy, we intend to be the leader or a leader. We're clearly well leader in triple net lease, the leader in GP Stakes, a leader in Direct Lending, a couple of other cars, but pretty -- that makes we're pretty uncrowded commute when there's just a few cars in the lane. And then we've added some other thesis there are direct adjacency’s, and you know on the exact infrastructure question. So Prima and insurance, Kuvare offer 2 quite different additions to our capability set. So look, we're in real estate, and we're in credit and we have certainly launched for a very long time as to when we could do real estate credit. Well, not too hard to figure out contingency of that statement. And we've said it on these prior calls before. Here's the history with real estate credit. We, as a credit firm, of course, has been to approach all the time with I think we've now looked at close to 10,000 different loans. And certainly, we've been approached about real estate loans. And the phenomenon we have for years and years is we would be willing to do the work in our current diversified products in the area, we could do real estate is a piece of it. But every time we…

Next question comes from Bill Katz from TB Colin. Your line is now open.

So just one of the debates comes up a lot is just a higher for longer backdrop. And how does that sort of the ebbs and flows of that, the puts and takes. So I was wondering, I think the Part 1 fees are pretty straightforward. But I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about just the resilience of the platform, particularly on the credit side, if we were to stay in the higher for longer. And how to think through the bear case that it would have a pickup in credit losses against a portfolio that has improvement over prior credit cycles as currently put together.

Sure. And Alan, I can probably comment on it, but let me start with the headline. Look, we do floating rate debt that is our business for our investors. And that is mathematically definitionally means when rates are higher, the absolute returns for our investors are on average higher. And when rates are lower, on average, they'll be a little bit lower. Sitting here today, and look, there's a lot of things we've been right about and wrong about and that will continue to be true. But I will say that a year ago, and everyone on this call probably can check us on this one, we have been talking about the higher for longer case for quite a long time. And we see it through our portfolio. Remember, we have almost 400 companies that we lend money to, and we study them and work with them very, very closely. And what we have seen consistently for the last year and still today, is inflation has not gone away. Now that's a consensus view. It seemed like a only voice in the words a year ago, even 4 months ago, we don't have this conversation when the world was talking about 7 rate cuts. Now we're in a world where it's somewhere balanced between 0 rate cuts and 1 right back to the new consensus. And that's a reality of what's happening from the ground up. We see wage pressures continue. You see cost pressures continue. Importantly, we see all these companies raising their prices. Someone's paying for that. So when you add it all together, inflation is not, of course, is not ranging the way it was 1.5 years ago, it's very real. So look, that does bring us to the higher for longer view from the ground up or not macro experts. But as a result of that, in a higher-for-longer world, which now seems pretty likely, of course, that does flow through in ever higher returns for our investors and to agree FPR. Remember, what's really important, though, other than the small amount of variance around fee related, which is not the RPR, which is a modest part of our revenue base. You have to remember, we at Blue Holland you know this, but I'm saying it more broadly, we have Blue Owl paid fees to manage the business. There's no carry. We have no capital markets fees. We don't have all these other variable fees that other people have to manage, which is complicated. Our business is very straightforward. And even with gyrations in spread or whether we do have a rate cut, don't have a rate cut, really, really moderate impacts on our business. So I'm going to let Alan comment on that, and then I'll come back to the credit question you had, and it's the case.

So two points here, I guess. One, I made the comment earlier in 2025, when you look at the curve today. versus at the end of the year, we're at 60 basis points to 80 basis points higher on the curve than where we were to translate that to how that impacts our business. I mentioned in the last quarter's call when asked about a rate decline question. I had said that about 100 basis points of rate decline would be about $40 million of increased or decreased. And now in this case, it's increased as opposed to the question last quarter, which would be decreased about $40 million of increased annual management fees.

And then let me tack back on to the credit question and attack it a couple of ways. First of all, and I said this before, within the land of our credit business, credit is everything. It's what we focus on. It's what we're focused on from day 1. It's why we focus on the large end of the market. It's why we focus so intensely on low loan to values, which in our portfolio, they remain on average in the 40s. So we're -- and in software lower, our portfolio performance. You look at our -- we look at our most recent results, on average, the EBITDA and revenue in our portfolio companies grew on average in the last quarter that we just finished our data analysis on at double digits. So we understand and of course, we're always thinking about, gee, the credit downturn, which is really economic downturn right? -- separate thing called the credit downturn unless you do credit poorly, and I feel confident we haven't done that. And so at the end of the day, we're still growing robustly in our portfolio on average. Of course, there's going to be peculiar credit issues. Of course, there's companies that have their own peculiar challenges. But remember, our nonaccruals are well below 1% of our book. And our loss rate historically now has been at 7 basis points per year. So I think we're starting from an incredibly good place. And here's I guess 2 things to take away from that. We care intensely about credit. As an investor in the Blue Owl stock, they'll again, remember, we could pay fees to manage these funds. So ultimately, that's not really a question that bears on the shareholder of Blue Owl in any meaningful way, matters to us…

Question comes from Patrick Davitt from Autonomous. Your line is now open.

My question is on Kuvare. Could you help us frame maybe how much run rate organic flow you expect from the insurance entity post close maybe how fast that has been growing? And then more broadly, contrast how you see alt's insurance TAM versus others. Given your asset classes are generally outside of the lower fee fixed income replacement assets, most of the other alts are focusing on.

Sure. So I don't want to speak on behalf of Kuvare, the insurance company, which remember, we are buying the asset manager, and we're an asset manager, so balance sheet light provider of management services, and they are a really strong insurance originator. So that's their side of the equation. I don't mean that in a lack of partner way. We're very much partnered, but I want to understand that they are the insurance company, we are their partner asset manager. With that said, we know that, for example, last year, they grew their book by $5.6 billion. So part of this whole exercise was to get more capital freed up and focused on supporting the growth of their insurance company, including our $250 million preferred investment. So last year was $5.6 billion. They were looking for more capital to continue to grow and to grow, I think we'll continue to see very healthy growth. They have a great origination business. I've mentioned this before, but they punch way above their weight. Here's a firm of a size that is in the Japanese market, which is one of the most discerning markets, as I understand it, for these types of annuity products. And they're right in there with the very biggest and the very best. And I think it's a real credit to what they've done on the insurance origination and management side. So I won't forecast their number for them, but I think it is safe to say that given the growth they've had in the past, we expect to see that kind of growth continues, that's why they want the capital.

And the vast majority of that growth is going to come for assets that we manage going forward.

Yes. And remember, we now require the whole of their asset management business, which means we do have all the product capabilities built out. That you just described. So with this brings to us the ability to deliver the comprehensive solution, you just postulated about others. So we do have all that now. Our focus isn't on the low fee products. But we have the capabilities now and it's not like we just missed having matter just having the comprehensive set of solutions. It will be part of our growth profile going forward, too. So we do have that full range today. In terms of the addressable market, it's actually a really interesting question. We all know this is evolving in the interrelationship between insurance and asset management or alternative asset managers. And there's different models, I don't think there's one singular right model. I will say that our model is built around staying very focused on being really good at asset management and letting insurance companies to be really good at insurance and being a partner to them as opposed to a competitor with them, which is very consistent with our model. We are a capital solutions provider with the picks and shovels, right? We do that. We provide capital solutions to GPs themselves with our GP solutions business, help them grow their businesses. We provide capital solutions to corporate owners of real estate to help them grow their businesses. We provide financing solutions to PE portfolio companies. And now with our below strategic equity, we provide GP Continuation Capital. All of those are solutions to, for example, a private equity firm, not competition with the private equity firm. So I think we've got a very clear focus and same thing in insurance. We are now -- we are their partner, and we're here to help them grow and not try to take growth from them.

Our next question from Crispin Love from Piper Sandler. Your line is now open.

You hit on this a little bit with a prior question, but just with the announced acquisition of Prima. You explain why you did the deal and how you do the credit work. But can you discuss what opportunities you're most interested in once the deal closes? Would you expect to be active in distressed areas such as deals in office or be active in multifamily or kind of other areas like CMBS in addition to deals more related to your triple net lease product, but on the debt side. Just curious, your thoughts here on where you might add capital in this part of the business when the deal closes?

Sure. Well, let me start with this observation on every acquisition we make, our mission is to have a best-of-class team as a part of that, and we have that with Prima, which also means first job is to make sure we only enhance doing well at they already do, we once combined. And that's been true. Look at our Oak Street business, now the real estate business. That's a business that has thrived because they're great at what they do, again, now we, but is phrasing, I'm purposely trying to be intentional about this idea of not ever disrupted only enhancing the investment process. So our first job is to continue to do a fantastic job for Prima LPs in the products they have. Now with their capabilities and ours, there are opportunities for us to deliver great results to their existing or new LPs and do so well for our shareholders. When you think about where we'll go, remember we also have now brought on a world-class real estate finance professional, Jesse Hom. Jesse Hom, who is quite well known in the world of real estate finance, having led this at GIC will be joining us to lead this overall initiative. So Prima comes on board, we'll keep doing Prima really well. And then we will extend -- to answer your question, again, remember our DNA and our comfort, our idea is to go into a market and find ways to take risk out and are really attractive, stable returns. So that would tend towards leaning our mindset, not toward opportunistic stress let's go find a messy office building rather it, hey, this is a dysfunctional market now. We can go in and do very high-quality things that are much lower leverage, much less deep in the cap stack and earn a very active return providing that capital. So I think that frame of reference is likely to be more where we live than all of a sudden trying to move out to the periphery of return seekers, that's not our mission. Our mission is to have sleep at night well money for our investors and deliver really good returns for it.

Our next question comes from Brian Mckenna. Your line is now open.

Most questions have been asked, but just a quick one for me. So you've clearly been active on the M&A front, and you've also made a number of senior hires as well. So I think integration of all these businesses and people will be important to the longer-term growth and success of Blue Owl. So what are you doing to make sure integration of all this is successful over time? And I guess what I'm getting at is how do you make sure 1 plus 1 equals more than 2?

That is exactly right at exactly what we focus on and exactly where I think we've developed now, I'd say, our muscles to do it well. We think integration is critical. And that is part of -- again, the benefit here is don't disrupt anything about the strong investment performance and practices of businesses but enhance them with the intellectual capital and capabilities that we have, bring the backbone that we have operationally to each of these companies to help support them doing an even better job at the investment business. I want to make sure we say this. We've talked a lot about M&A on here. The vast preponderance of our growth is organic. And the M&A is actually pretty moderate when you get down to a number of people, impact on business. I just talked about Prima. It's a wonderful business. It comes with a wonderful team. It does something very specific, though. It's not this isn't some grand complex integration. Actually, it's pretty straightforward. And that's not to take it lightly. It's just to say we to distinguish between complicated integrations and acquisitions, not something that we pursue with any great vigor and relatively simple ones like a Prima. So an acquisition is not an acquisition in the generic set. That said, I think we feel very, very good about our pathway. And let me just point back to real estate. So Oak Street, when we acquired Oak Street now our real estate business, I believe it had about $70 million in FRE. And today, we're running at about $200 million of FRE. Triple. Tripled that business. And Marc Zahr and his team and Chair and others have been phenomenally effective as an integrated part of this firm. Michael Reiter, who comes in as operational integrates to our operations that has been an absolutely case study for us in how we can do this. And so we learn our lessons. Again, we're not saying we're perfect by any measure. But I think we feel very, very good that we can handle these acquisitions, and we'll be very, very careful as we look and we'll continue to look at organic and inorganic growth, but let's not lose track of the fact that most of our growth has been and likely will be organic growth up and to the right, the boring Blue Street up to the right.

We don't have any questions at this moment. I'd now like to hand back over to Marc for final remarks.

Great. Thank you all very much. Really appreciate the time and your patience and your interest, and we're going to go away and be credit animals and try to do some more boring quarters for you. But we do appreciate it very much and back to it. Thank you.

Thanks for attending today's call. We hope you have a wonderful day. Stay safe.