Greetings, and welcome to the Oshkosh Corporation Third Quarter 2025 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Pat Davidson, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations for Oshkosh. Please proceed.

Good morning, and thanks for joining us. Earlier today, we published our third quarter 2025 results. A copy of that release is available on our website at oshkoshcorp.com. Today's call is being webcast and is accompanied by a slide presentation, which includes a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures that we will use during this call and is also available on our website. The audio replay and slide presentation will be available on our website for approximately 12 months. Please refer now to Slide 2 of that presentation. Our remarks that follow, including answers to your questions, contain statements that we believe to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks that could cause actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks include, among others, matters that we have described in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC this morning and other filings we make with the SEC as well as matters noted at our Investor Day in June 2025. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements, which may not be updated until our next quarterly earnings conference call, if at all. Our presenters today include John Pfeifer, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Matt Field, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Please turn to Slide 3, and I'll turn it over to you, John.

Thanks, Pat, and good morning, everyone. We continue to successfully navigate a dynamic external environment with resilience and a strong sense of purpose to serve our everyday heroes with high-quality products that are safe, intuitive and productive. We do this with a strong mission of service for our everyday heroes like firefighters in our communities. We proudly sponsored the 13th annual 9/11 Memorial Stair Climb in Green Bay where more than 2,000 people raised over $120,000 for the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation and honored the brave firefighters that lost their lives on 9/11. We also demonstrated our commitment to our communities as over 1,200 volunteers came together for OshKosh's eighth annual Feed the Body, Feed the Soul event. These volunteers packs 224,000 pounds of rice in just 12 hours to support individuals and families facing food insecurity across Eastern Wisconsin. Turning to our financial results on Slide 4. We delivered an adjusted operating margin of 10.2% on revenue of $2.7 billion in our third quarter. This led to adjusted earnings per share of $3.20, an increase of 9.2% over the prior year. These results reflect solid performance across each of our segments. Despite lower revenue, we maintained a double-digit adjusted operating income margin year-over-year, reflecting continued strong performance in our vocational segment, improved returns in our Transport segment and a resilient double-digit margin in our Access segment. Our adjusted EPS grew compared with last year, reflecting our operating performance and taxes. While I am pleased with the resilience demonstrated in our third quarter results, we are updating our outlook for the full year to reflect the demand environment we have been seeing starting mostly in the third quarter. We are revising our 2025 adjusted EPS guidance to a range of $10.50 to $11, which reflects slightly lower revenue expectations for…

Thanks, John. Please turn to Slide 10. Consolidated sales for the third quarter were nearly $2.7 billion, a decrease of $53 million or 2% from the same quarter last year, primarily due to lower sales volume in the access segment partially offset by higher vocational and transport sales volume and improved pricing. Adjusted operating income was $274 million, down slightly from the prior year, primarily reflecting lower volume. Adjusted operating income margin of 10.2% was roughly in line with last year on slightly lower sales. Adjusted earnings per share was $3.20 in the third quarter, $0.27 higher than last year. Adjusted EPS was favorably impacted by about $0.30 due to lower tax expense resulting from the resolution of a multiyear U.S. federal income tax audit. During the quarter, we again stepped up share repurchases, repurchasing approximately 666,000 shares of our stock for $91 million, bringing year-to-date share repurchases to $159 million. Share repurchases during the previous 12 months benefited adjusted EPS by $0.05 compared to the third quarter of 2024. Free cash flow for the quarter was strong at $464 million compared to $272 million in the third quarter of 2024, primarily reflecting working capital changes, including customer advances and inventory. Turning to our segment results on Slide 11. The Access segment delivered resilient adjusted operating income margins of 11% on sales of $1.1 billion. Sales were $254 million or nearly 19% lower than last year, which reflected weaker market conditions in North America and higher discounts. Our Vocational segment continue to deliver strong sales growth through higher volumes and improved pricing as we deliver our backlog, achieving an adjusted operating income margin of 15.6% on $968 million in sales. Sales grew $154 million or nearly 19% from last year, led by improved throughput from municipal fire apparatus and robust…

Thanks, Matt. It's clear that 2025 has proven to be a dynamic year, including the tariff landscape and sustained higher interest rates. Our updated outlook reflects the impact of these conditions on our customers and in turn, on the demand for our products, notably in the Access segment. Even so, our team has shown strong focus and agility by managing through these conditions while delivering solid results. This performance reinforces our confidence in managing the near-term while supporting our long-term growth objectives. Earlier this year at our Investor Day, we shared our vision to roughly double adjusted EPS to a range of $18 to $22 per share by 2028. Each quarter represents a step toward that goal and we're encouraged by the steps our teams are making today to lay the groundwork for nearly doubling EPS by then. We appreciate your continued confidence in Oshkosh and look forward to updating you as we advance our strategy and create long-term value for shareholders, customers and team members. I'll turn it back to you now, Pat, for the Q&A.

Thanks, John. I'd like to remind everyone to please limit your questions to one plus a follow-up. Please stay disciplined on your follow-up question. And after that, we'll ask that you rejoin the queue if you have additional questions. Operator, please begin the Q&A session.

Our first question comes from Mig Dobre with Baird.

Maybe we can start with Access a little bit. And I'm sort of curious your perspective here as you're talking to your customers, obviously, not only for business covering Q4 but into 2026, you hinted at the fact that prices are going to go up which makes sense given tariffs and whatnot. What is your sense for where demand seems to be shaken out because we have seen some that are increasing CapEx at least optically, it looks like there is some signs of stabilization in that industry. I'm curious if that sort of gels with what you're hearing or your salespeople are hearing is they're contemplating in 2026. And maybe more broadly, what should investors be thinking, just as a general framework for the segment next year? It look to me like production is likely to be down in the first half of '26, but perhaps you think about it differently.

Well, I'll answer that, Mig, it's John. So thanks for your question. We're not guiding today, but I can give you some context on what we see ahead for sure. We'll guide -- we're in discussions with all of our customers about what 2026 looks like. So we'll have a lot better clarity for you when we get through the fourth quarter, but I'll give you context. First of all, we don't know if at this point in time, if production is going to be down in the first half of 2026. I honestly don't know that. What I will tell you is that we feel -- when we look at the market going forward, we all customers are not the same. This is a vast customer base. We've got thousands of independent rental customers, and we've got a group of big national rental customers and you've heard some positive things from the big national rental customers of ours. There is still a bit of hesitancy in the very near term. When I talk about the very near term, I'm talking about Q3, Q4 in terms of with the current environment, how much equipment do I want to take in the here and now. But when we look forward to '26, and we see what's going on in the market, we talk about long-term demand drivers a lot. You hear about mega projects. Constantly, those are real and they are ongoing and they do drive a lot of equipment. But we're starting to also see some free up in terms of the commercial construction activity. So there's been -- [ nonres ] has had a lot of commercial construction kind of on hold or pause. Some of -- a lot of those projects are starting to get cleared through the -- into the planning phase. That's a very positive sign for the market going forward. So we'll get through this year, which has been one of the most dynamic years that anybody in business has ever experienced. We'll manage it really well. We'll continue to deliver strong margins even through this dynamic period of 2025. And as we get into 2026, we'll give you some guidance in January. And we think that the market long term looks very, very healthy as we've been saying for a while.

Understood. My follow-up, maybe to put a finer point on the tariffs, give us a sense here for how the tariff picture has changed for you, maybe quantify the cost. And then as you think about next year, and again, I'm not asking for guidance, I'm just asking for your strategy, how do you think you'll be able to mitigate these tariffs, if any at all?

So tariffs for this year, it's kind of $30 million to $40 million is what we see for the full year. Most of that being in the fourth quarter. So we would estimate that to be about $20 million to $30 million in the fourth quarter. Obviously, as you look into 2026, you'd project a full year impact as that -- as those are implemented and feathered in. What you don't see in the fourth quarter is the pricing John talked about and you highlighted in your questions. So there be some pricing that would occur in 2026 against that. So that's how I think about tariffs for next year and how are they kind of feathered in this year.

The next question comes from Stephen Volkmann with Jefferies.

So the follow-on, just to Mig's question, actually, is it reasonable to think that you can offset this tariff headwind during 2026? Is that sort of the plan? Or will it take longer?

Steve, so as we've talked about on prior calls, our approach to tariffs is really multifaceted. First, it's negotiating the supply chain. Second, it's what we call tariff engineering, and that can come in many forms, and that could be sourcing, it could be how we import. It could be the classification as we run into and other classifications. We look strongly at each part we bring in and make sure it's classified in the right way so that we get the right tariff treatment. And then only then do we start talking about pricing. So it would be preliminary for me to speculate on how much would be offset next year. But certainly, the goal is we mitigate as much as we can on the cost side and then we look at what pricing we need to discuss with our customers. John, is there anything you want to add?

I just want to make a point to say that we do, do a lot. We've got a lot of really great work happening with our teams, supply chain first and foremost. There's engineering manufacturing teams. We do a lot of work to offset the impact of tariffs, and we've had a lot of success doing that. Our MO when we look at tariffs is we want to absolutely minimize the impact of tariffs on our customers. That's our first goal, minimize the impact to the customer. And we'll -- we've been pretty good at doing that. Now you can't mitigate everything. So that's why I said in my prepared remarks that there'll be some price increase in 2026. We believe that the landscape will be calmed down enough to be able to assess what any price increase needs to be. But our MO is to get through this without impacting customers very much.

Got it. And then if my math is right, I think you're sort of implied to incremental margins for vocational in the fourth quarter, like 40%, which is obviously impressive, especially with tariffs. How should we think about that going forward? Is that a reasonable assumption for a while? Or is that something special?

So yes. So fourth quarter, the math would imply exactly as you said, about a 40% incremental. For the year, our guidance is about 33% actually. So it's really impacted this year as higher production throughput, higher volume. We've had a good mix with strong sales in airport products. Again, it'd be preliminary for me to speculate what the incrementals are. Our 2028 guidance, which we provided in June will be a little lighter than that on an annualized basis, but certainly strong results out of vocational. Thanks for highlighting.

The next question comes from Jamie Cook with Truist Securities.

I guess just two questions. One, John, as you think about the competitive landscape within access equipment, in some of the market share movement you've seen between you and your peers. Do you feel like with Section 232 and tariffs, like are you in a position to gain share just based on your manufacturing footprint relative to some of your peers? And then my second question, if you could just quantify or talk through more some of the discounting that you noticed in the access market, quantify it and to what degree, given the tariff situation, does this ease, I guess?

Yes. Sure. So I'll -- thanks, Jamie, for the question. In the Access equipment world, what we're doing is we're executing what we call a local-for-local strategy. Now we've always been predominantly a footprint of U.S. manufacturing for U.S. sales in the U.S. in our Access business. So that's good. We started with a strong position. We're continuing to execute that and do more and more of that in the U.S. but also in Europe. It's that overarching strategy allows us to manage the tariff landscape as best we can and minimize the cost that we incur. So yes, we think that, that helps us a lot versus the competitive environment, particularly against competitors that are outside the United States for sure. But JLG is the leading brand in the industry. We've got fantastic innovations that continue to come to market. our intent is to continue to focus on our customers, how can we drive improvement for them. And that ultimately is what drives long-term share. And that's what we're intently focused on. So that's what I can tell you about that.

So -- and Jamie, just adding to your second question and your follow on. So the team practices very disciplined pricing. You've seen that in prior cycles, you've seen it in prior quarters. That's also supported by a strong service network. And that, in the end results in a very strong residual on our JLG equipment, and that's important for rental customers. And so what you saw in the third quarter is about a 3%, 4% all-in discount level, which we think is very reasonable given the external environment we have. Obviously, we've not gotten into pricing for tariffs in the third quarter with the limited impact, and that will really be a factor in 2026 versus 2025.

The next question comes from Tami Zakaria with JPMorgan.

Good morning. Thank you so much. question from me on the warranty costs, which seems to be an item headwind in the quarter. Are you able to elaborate on that? What's driving it? And how to think about it for the rest of the year?

Tami, so that's really a onetime item we had in the third quarter as we're working through the units that we've built, specifically in the defense sector for vehicles in the kind of supply chain shortages, '21 '22, where we identified issues that we need to repair as we built with kind of interim parts and so forth. So we took that charge in the third quarter. We think that's behind us.

Yes, Tami, I want to just emphasize, that's a core defense product. It's not the postal vehicle. It's core defense. We are a quality-focused company. We're known in the Department of Defense for quality. When we see that we have an issue, we wrap it up and we address it as quickly as we can with the customer. Again, as Matt said, this is not an ongoing issue to expect going forward.

Understood. That's very helpful. And one question on Access. I remember, I think earlier in the year, you talked about taking some pricing -- doing some price investments. Did that -- is that still the case? Do you expect that to continue through the rest of the year? Or anything changed there?

Can you clarify that, Tami, I'm not sure if I got exactly what you were referring to.

So my question is on Access pricing, aerials pricing for the year. The way it's playing out, do you expect positive pricing this year as some of these tariffs have come in? Or are you going back to your customers and giving some discount? Any comments on pricing and how that's trending in the Access segment would be helpful.

Okay. I'm sorry, I got it. Go ahead, Matt.

Yes. Thanks for the clarification. So as I just mentioned, this year, really, given the weakness we see in external demand, we've seen a negative pricing environment in access. Obviously, with tariffs hitting in the latter part of this year and mostly next year, we would talk about a different pricing environment into 2026.

The next question comes from Mike Shlisky with D.A. Davidson.

In Access, it seems like a lot of the client taking -- just digging a little bit deeper into the numbers, a lot of the clients in third quarter came from telehandlers, it was down like, I think, a little over 40% on the sales line. And you're actually expending capacity there. Could you maybe just take the Access discussion one step deeper and just tell us a little bit about how that's going, what's happening there compared to the core aerials?

Yes. The difference is Cat. We've talked about it for a few quarters that we've had a long-term agreement with Cat. That agreement is no longer in place, and that's the primary reason you see the change in telehandlers. JLG telehandlers including the Skytrack models, they're doing great, they're not losing share there. And then you look at the aerials, we're in a situation where the market is down because of nonresidential private construction being down, but this is -- it's a temporary phenomenon. And long term, we see very strong health in the market, and we're really pleased with how we're able to perform with resilience during -- you see in Q3, for example, our revenue and access equipment is down nearly 19%, and we're at healthy double-digit margins. That's exactly the way we expect to operate, and that's what we're doing. And we'll continue through this and the market will grow as we go forward.

Great. And then just talking about peers real quick. Have you seen any impact over the last few weeks at peers from the federal government shutdown, especially any local effects on fire fighter assistance grants or other state owned government systems that the federal government provides to fire departments?

Mike, it's Matt. So in terms of federal government shutdown in the near term, we've not really seen a material impact. If it extends much longer or significantly longer, I guess, we may have some contracts affected as we do sell directly to the government in some cases, think about our products and so forth. So there would be some knock-on effects if this extends for an extended period of time. Not huge numbers, but certainly something that I would watch for.

The next question comes from Kyle Menges with Citigroup.

I think NGDV sales of $146 million in the quarter was a little bit below your expectation. And it sounds like fourth quarter is going to be a little lower than initially expected. So just curious what's driving that? What have been some of the challenges in increasing capacity? And then I don't want to put words in your mouth, but I got the sense from the prepared remarks, perhaps a walk back of the earlier guidance to get to annualized full run rate production of, I think, 16,000 to 20,000 units by year-end. Like is that still feasible in your mind? Yes, I would just love to hear an update on that.

Yes, I'll start with the 16,000 to 20,000 units as an annualized number. And so let me start from the top. I'm going to start with talking about the product, the NGDV or the new postal vehicles, an amazing product, the feedback that we continue to receive with now over 4 million miles driven in delivery operations by postal carriers is really positive. As I said on the call in my prepared remarks, this is a brand-new plant with a brand-new product and highly automated processes, it's a fantastic plant. We have made progress, you can see the revenue growing there, but not to date at the pace that we want it to be at. So we're working really hard. We've got great people in place that are working on continuing to drive production increases until we get to full rate production. We expect to grow revenue sequentially and believe we will exit 2025 in a good position to support our plans for the United States Postal Service and a really strong 2026. So that's kind of the state of the program but -- for you.

Got it. And just curious, I guess, when you would expect maybe now to hit that full annualized run rate production? And then my follow-up was just going to be on the lower CapEx guide, it looks like you brought it down $50 million. So curious what drove that.

Yes. So I'll start by the full rate production. We continue to target full rate production by the end of this year. I want to say that's not without challenges, of course, as I just mentioned previously, we have constant communication with the United States Postal Service to the highest levels. We're doing everything we can, but our plans are to get to full rate production by the end of the year. Matt, do you want to talk about the $0.50?

Yes. The reduction in CapEx reflects twofold. One, stricter spending controls in this environment, but then two, just timing of spending.

Our next question comes from Angel Castillo with Morgan Stanley.

Just wanted to go back to some of the discussion around Access. Could you just clarify, I guess, is the greater cautiousness that you talked about from your customers reflecting itself purely in just kind of the low ordering or the low book-to-bill this quarter? Or are you seeing any kind of order cancellations or delivery push out here? And just if you could add a little bit more color as part of that, kind of how the behavior maybe differs between the nationals and independents?

Yes. So first, Angel, thanks for the question. We had a 0.6 book-to-bill. That's a normal book-to-bill for a third quarter, if you look historically. That said, the market has been a little bit softer compared to last year, as I already mentioned. I want to emphasize that end market demand in this -- here is healthy. The equipment utilization is healthy in the market. Used market is healthy. That's all really good signs. What we're seeing in the dynamic market with continuously shifting tariffs, prolonged higher interest rates, that's caused a lot of customers to say, hey, the market is healthy, but I just -- in the very near term, I'm just going to kind of hold back on my CapEx until I get a little bit more clarity as to how this is going to evolve, see the Fed continue to drop rates, things like that. That's really what we feel is happening in the market.

That's helpful. And maybe just related to that, I know it's still early for fiscal year '26 and a lot of moving pieces here, but given just your ongoing kind of discussions with customers, whether on kind of the near-term environment for next year, can you just talk about the magnitude of the price increases that are currently being discussed for next year? And whether that kicks in kind of January 1? And just kind of overall discussion of that -- those negotiations because I guess, if I'm not mistaken, on the discounting part, it seems like discounting may have stepped up from 2% to 3% to 3% to 4%. So if you could just kind of help us understand perhaps the trajectory of that versus the kind of increases expected in Jan 1?

Yes, I'd be preliminary to talk about pricing for 2026. On a quarterly basis, it's really what you see there is some seasonality in how we go to market.

The next question comes from Tim Thein with Raymond James.

Great. Just a lot of dialogue here on Access, but maybe I'll ask another one. Just with respect to your expectations, John, for order activity here in the fourth quarter and specifically maybe the composition, I would imagine more of your NRCs are the ones that take up the order slots in the fourth quarter that are booking orders rather. But maybe just any kind of guardrails as to how you're thinking and maybe how the initial discussions have shaped up just with respect to how we should be thinking about order activity. Obviously, that will be important as to how we think about '26. So maybe I'll start with that one. And then part B of the question is just on the vocational segment. And just on fire & emergency, obviously, that's a big part of the nice margin improvement that you have lined up into that 2028 target as you talked earlier about more stock units in the Build My Pierce. Does that have any implications that we should think about from a product mix standpoint? So that's two long questions.

Yes. So one on access, one on the fire industry and our fire truck business, Pierce. To start on access. I mean you kind of hit the nail on the head, Tim. The reason that we went from an $11 guide to a -- $10.50 to $11 guide is primarily orders in the fourth quarter for Access. And when I say orders in the fourth quarter for Access, I'm talking about orders in the fourth quarter for delivery in the fourth quarter. And right now, it's in terms of how much equipment our customers, I'm talking from the thousands of independents to the big guys are going to take in the fourth quarter, but that's why there's a bit of a range there from $10.50 to $11. If it's as we expect, we'll be around $11. If it's -- they're not going to take quite as much equipment in the fourth quarter, then it could come down a little bit. With regard -- hey, I want to continue to emphasize how well our people at Access Equipment and JLG are performing in this very dynamic market. We're performing extremely well. We'll continue to do that in this environment. But again, we see nice growth on the horizon ahead of us as we've talked about through the year. On our Pierce business, the fire truck business, we're continuing to get improved output. We'll continue to get improved output as we go forward the next few years. That will continue to draw the backlog down. The Build my Pierce and more of the off-the-shelf fire trucks are great products. We don't see a specific margin differential between whether or not we're shipping Build My Pierce units or we're building our fully customized units.

The next question comes from Steve Barger with KeyBanc.

This is actually Christian Zyla on for Steve Barger. Just as a follow-up, maybe to Tim's first question on Access. I heard your comments about the near-term uncertainty your customers are facing. Just historically, 4Q was a big sequential order quarter for Access as your customers plan for next year. So do you still see a normal step-up in 4Q? Or is that more of a 1Q event now? And then is your access backlog split evenly? Or does this skew one way between bigger nationals or the smaller independents?

Christian, it's Matt. So the way to think about Q4 is you're right. Traditionally, the book-to-bill will be higher. Honestly, I think it would be presumptive of me to assume that, that's the same as you end up with price negotiations. Some of that might set to January versus December. But honestly, it's too early to make a call like that. So traditionally, I would say it's higher, how it's going to shape up this year is unclear.

Got it. Okay. And then just switching gears to your defense related business. It seems like the industry is wanting more transport type vehicles. Is that what you're seeing as well? It may be a pitch for the CTT program. What differentiates your portfolio capabilities versus the other bidders in that program?

Yes. Thanks for the question. Sure. I mean what's really differentiating us in this market today is our technological capability as well as our quality. We've got a really strong quality and service reputation, so they know what they get when we supply them with tactical-wheeled vehicles. But going forward, as I talked in my prepared remarks, it's a lot about things like autonomous functionality or full autonomy and that's why you see a lot of our products moving that way with the technology that we have. And that's kind of what we see as the future of this. And it's why we stand out in that industry is that reliability and the technological performance and capabilities of our vehicles that get better and better as we go forward.

Our next question comes from David Raso with Evercore.

Of the defense revenue cut by $200 million, how much of that was the postal truck?

It was all on the delivery side, David.

All of it, yes.

And when it comes to that, is that the ramp-up of the BEV truck that's giving you a little bit of struggle to ramp up? Or is it the ICE truck as well?

It's unrelated to ICE and BEV, David. The vehicles are produced on the same line. It's just continuing to dial in all of the autonomous functionality of this manufacturing plant and its normal ramp-up challenges that we're addressing and we will get to full rate production. But it's not related to ICE and BEV.

I mean just so I know how much of this you feel is under your control because 35% to 40% of the EBIT cut actually came from defense. And that program is hugely significant next year for driving defense profits to say, take a little pressure off of Access, so it's not immaterial. I think most people feel Vocational, that backlog should carry you, but that interplay between transport, defense and Access is not immaterial. So can you be a little clearer on when do you feel you'll have the ability to ramp that -- I was looking for revenues getting close to $300 million a quarter at some point not too far in the future. So I apologize to push a little bit, but just a little more clarity. It's very important for '26.

That's fine, David. So just on the OI, remember the warranty charge we took in the third quarter, which is about $13 million, that's flowing into OI for the full year. We did fully expect the licensing, which was in our guidance, the warranty however, it would flow through to OI. So you shouldn't look at the top line change in revenue as the full impact on to OI.

Okay. The licensing was in the guide.

Yes. We were expecting that, that was under negotiation when we set up our guidance for the year previously.

And David, I will just say your expectation for quarterly revenue on the delivery side is in line with ours.

Thank you. At this time, I would like to turn the call back over to Mr. Pat Davidson for closing comments.

Thank you, and thanks for joining us today. We will be meeting with investors at several conferences during the fourth quarter in Chicago, Florida and New York. We'd be happy to connect in an early January, we'll be showcasing our technology at the annual CES show in Las Vegas. We encourage you to stop by our booth and learn about technology that supports airports, job sites and neighborhoods of the future. Take care, everyone, and have a great rest of the day.

Thank you. This does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a great day.