Greetings, and welcome to the Oshkosh Corporation Fiscal 2018 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Pat Davidson, Senior VP of Investor Relations for Oshkosh Corporation. Thank you, Mr. Davidson. You may begin.

Good morning, and thanks for joining us. Earlier today, we published our fourth quarter 2018 results. A copy of the release is available on our website at oshkoshcorporation.com. Today's call is being webcast and is accompanied by a slide presentation, which includes a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures that we will use during this call and is also available on our website. The audio replay and slide presentation will be available on our website for approximately 12 months. Please refer now to slide 2 of that presentation. Our remarks that follow, including answers to your questions, contain statements that we believe to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks that could cause actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks include, among others, matters that we've described in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC this morning and other filings we make with the SEC. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements, which may not be updated until our next quarterly earnings conference call, if at all. All references on this call to a quarter or a year are to our fiscal quarter or fiscal year unless stated otherwise. Our presenters today include Wilson Jones, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Dave Sagehorn, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Please turn to slide 3 and I'll turn it over to you, Wilson.

Thank you, Pat. Good morning, everyone. We're pleased to announce another quarter of solid results with $1.80 adjusted earnings per share, a strong finish to a year in which we achieved near-term highs in revenues, adjusted operating income and adjusted earnings per share. And our team delivered these results despite a very challenging backdrop of sharply rising commodity prices and global trade tensions. We're also pleased to announce today our initial outlook for 2019, which we believe will be another good year. Our confidence in 2019 is supported by strong backlogs across all four segments and an expectation for favorable end market demand to our businesses to continue. We talked previously about the importance of our team members and our People First culture to our success. There are many workplace studies that show that strong cultures drive strong engagement. We believe this engagement is a big part of our success at Oshkosh. Our excellent results in 2018 and our positive outlook for 2019 are only possible as a result of the hard work of our team members. We're focused on continuing to grow our People First culture, and in turn, our team members. It's a journey that never ends, and we're committed to ensuring that our team members are engaged and connected as we move forward. These team members are key to executing our MOVE strategy. A significant part of that strategy is simplifying our operations and business processes as we strive to serve our customers and remain the clear supplier of choice in our markets. We recognize that there's more to do, but I'm very proud of the efforts and progress that our team has made to reduce complexity in our business and drive growth. Please turn to slide 4, and let's talk about the full year. 2018 was…

Thanks, Wilson. Good morning, everyone. Please turn to slide 9. We capped off a very good year with a strong fourth quarter. Results for the quarter significantly exceeded prior year and exceeded our expectations. Consolidated net sales for the quarter were $2.06 billion, up 4.8% from the prior-year quarter, led by a 27% increase in access equipment segment. Fourth quarter sales in this segment were stronger than we expected, reinforcing the positive outlook that the rental company customers have for their businesses. Defense sales were down 22% as the prior-year quarter included nearly 400 international M-ATVs. Fire & emergency and commercial sales were little changed from the prior-year quarter. Fire & emergency did have several international multi-unit sales move from this year into 2019, resulting in sales that were slightly lower than our most recent expectations. And commercial sales were slightly higher than our most recent expectations. Adjusted consolidated operating income for the fourth quarter was $180.1 million, or 8.8% of sales, compared to $150 million, or 7.6% of sales in the prior-year quarter. Each of the non-defense segments delivered higher adjusted operating income and at least 100 basis points higher adjusted operating income margin. Defense adjusted operating income was lower due to the lower sales volume and the mix shift away from international M-ATVs to JLTVs, offset in part by improved manufacturing performance. We performed a detailed review of margin expectations on the JLTV program as part of our year-end close. And while we see opportunities for margin improvement for the program, at this time, these opportunities are not mature enough to incorporate into the expected overall program margin. As of the end of September, we have more than 80% yet to complete on this contract, and we need to have a high confidence level in achieving and sustaining…

Thanks, Dave. We just concluded a very successful year. The Oshkosh team worked hard to deliver these results and will continue to work hard and execute as we strive to deliver another year of good performance in 2019. It won't be easy. It never is. But we believe the strength of our engaged team members and People First culture when combined with our products and technology will continue to drive our success. I'm proud of our team, and I'm confident that we will continue to execute on our strategic priorities to drive value for all stakeholders. I'll turn it back over to Pat to get the Q&A started.

Thanks, Wilson. I'd like to remind everyone please limit your questions to one plus a follow-up. After the follow-up, we ask that you get back in the queue if you'd like to ask additional questions. Operator, please begin the question and answer period of this call.

Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Steve Volkmann with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Good morning, guys. Thank you.

Hey, Steve.

I'm wondering just if we can dig in a little bit further on the first quarter expectations, just because that's sort of a wide range. And obviously, we're all numerical folks out here. So it sounds like obviously you're thinking higher revenues but lower margins. And I guess, if there's just any other color you could provide to help us dial in on that?

Yeah, Steve. We don't go into a ton of detail when we talk about the quarters. I think that's kind of...

Correct.

...consistence is what we've done historically. What I would say in terms of the margin there, there will be some headwinds related to steel. We called that out last quarter. I think on the last quarter call, we called that a $15 million to $25 million headwind from steel. As we sit here today, we're thinking that's more near the low end of that range, but that certainly will be a detractor from what we would typically expect from a margin standpoint.

And it sounds like you're thinking the $5 million sort of benefit from the accounting change on F&E is all in the first quarter?

Yes.

Okay. All right. That's something. Thank you. And then, maybe, Wilson, just you mentioned some international opportunities both JLTV and M-ATV. I'm wondering, do you think the near-term opportunity is more one versus the other? And anyway to handicap how you think about the timing? We used to think that as soon as JLTV gets a full rate production, that opened the door to international orders. And so, I'm just trying to think through how you guys are looking at timing for these things.

Yeah, Steve. I think it really is – it's both JLTV and M-ATV opportunities continuing to be presented to us. You're right. Full rate production decision in December should lead to some more international orders on JLTV. As we've talked before, M-ATV opportunities continue to present themselves in the Middle East. And then, I think if you recall back last few calls, we've also talked that there are some sustainment opportunities. So it's more than just vehicles from an international standpoint. What we did say in our prepared remarks is that we wouldn't expect any significant sales shipments in 2019 for international. We should see some order opportunities, but we would expect those shipments to be on into 2020.

Okay. Great. That's helpful. I'll pass it on. Thank you.

Thanks Steve.

Our next question comes from the line of Courtney Yakavonis with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question. Courtney Yakavonis - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Hi, thanks guys.

Good morning. Courtney Yakavonis - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: I just wanted to dig in a little bit. Obviously, you had a pretty big access margin beat this quarter versus the guidance you gave. And I think Wilson talked to some of the operational efficiencies that you gained this quarter from some of your labor force. And I just wanted to understand how that relates to the margin guidance that you give for access for 2019? Is it right to assume that operations will be okay and that the headwinds will purely be cost inflation in freight specifically? Or is there something else we should be thinking about as we think about margins in 2019?

Good morning, Courtney. Overall for 2019, we do expect to see improved efficiencies. We saw sequential improvement in the fourth quarter as we mentioned on the call. The biggest dynamic I think that we're dealing with when we talk about margins in 2019 is really the cost price dynamic. At this time, the margin profile that we're estimating for the segment reflects that we'll be able to offset the costs, but not necessarily capture margin on those cost increases. And those cost increases, again, as we mentioned on the call, we saw some of the increases in 2018, but we expect more of those to come through in 2019. There is a little bit of a lag based on how we've purchased steel. And so we're still seeing cost escalation as we're heading into the beginning of the year here. But that's all factored into the outlook. We've got pricing assumptions around that. The team's working hard to maintain that price discipline. But that's the biggest driver that we see there. We do believe we're probably going to see some continuation of some supplier disruptions, although we think it will be continued to lessen versus what we saw in fiscal 2018. Courtney Yakavonis - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Okay. Great. Thanks. And then, just looking at the F&E margin guidance as well, I think that's the highest that we've seen in recent history there. Can you just talk about maybe the guideposts for how high F&E margins could go, especially since I think a lot of your backlog there still doesn't have pricing in it? So was that really just the impact of some of those international orders that are coming in? Or do we think there could be some more upside to that segment over time?

Courtney, they've been on a nice march improving margins over the last several years. And what we've said is we don't expect some of the big jumps that you've seen over the last few years. But there are still lots of opportunities for them to simplify the business. They've done some really nice things there, and there's a lot more to come, and they're staying focused on that. We haven't called what we think that number could be. But as Jim Johnson, their president, would say, there are opportunities and they do expect to continue to improve their margins over time. But we're going to stay within this year's guidance and end with that. Courtney Yakavonis - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Okay. Great. Thanks, guys

Thanks, Courtney.

Our next question comes from the line of Jamie Cook with Credit Suisse. Please proceed with your question. Themis Davris - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Hi. Good morning. This is actually Themis on for Jamie. Maybe if we could talk about defense a little bit, and in particular, your margin assumptions for 2019. I understand that margins are coming down as a function of the JLTV ramping. But is it just the mix story? Or is there anything else that is worth calling out? And also any comments on the cadence of margins for defense during the year would be helpful.

Yeah. In terms of drivers of the margin year-over-year, the other thing that's a factor in there is really related to our R&D activities. And while the level of R&D overall is largely unchanged from 2018 to 2019, in fiscal 2018, the R&D activities were more focused on areas where we were getting paid for that. And as we look at 2019, it's going to be more focused on areas where we're pursuing new opportunities on our own, and as a result, we don't have revenue associated with that. So that would be the other component in terms of the overall margin for the year in the defense segment.

Dave, how about M-ATV? There were some shipments in Q1.

Oh, yeah, that's the overall mix from M-ATVs coming down, JLTV continuing to ramp.

Yeah.

That's the biggest driver. But the other one would be the MPD there. In terms of cadence, some of that's going to be impacted by the new rev rec standard as we talked about. As we get orders in, we will record cumulative catch-up adjustments. So that's a little hard to call, but outside of that, I would say, the margins should be fairly balanced throughout the course of the year. But again, depending on timing of orders, we do expect to see some lumpiness. It's just a little hard to tell you today when those orders will come in from the government customer. Themis Davris - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Got it. That's helpful. And then, maybe quickly on your top line for defense, I think that based on what you already had in backlog last quarter for 2019, and what you booked in the quarter, I'm getting that we need roughly $400 million of incremental orders. So where do you think this is most likely to come from, and how are you thinking about the timing of these incremental orders that we need?

Yeah. As we ended the year, we had about $1.6 billion of backlog for fiscal 2019 in the defense segment. So $400 million is a good number to think about it. That's largely all going to come from domestic sources. As we mentioned on the call, we really don't have a lot baked into our outlook for fiscal 2019 from an international standpoint. You're always going to see one component being the normal run rate aftermarket business that comes in. So that will be a part of it. The other part will be FY19 government budget dollars starting to flow in. We'll start getting those in and get some sales later in the fiscal year that are associated with the government's fiscal 2019 budget. Themis Davris - Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Got it. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Jerry Revich with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question. Jerry Revich - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: Yes, hi. Good morning, everyone.

Hey, Jerry

Hey, Jerry Jerry Revich - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: In access equipment, you folks really had an outstanding quarter and demand accelerated from the third quarter and versus your expectations. Can you just talk about the demand cadence and what surprise to the upside, both from orders and shipments this quarter?

Jerry, I think from the demand side, if you look at 2018, I guess, you could term it a non-traditional order year. Remember our big first half that orders were really prevalent; and then, slowing in the third quarter. So if you look at our Q4, I would say that it's really timing. We've had some customers that are buying in a quarter that probably is a little unusual for them, out of their normal cadence. It's really – I think the whole Q4 order situation could just be described as timing. I think – again, it's been a case the whole year where people – customers were forecasting with us, but not necessarily staying with that forecast. We've had some pull forward and some push back. If you remember, we carried over quite a bit more backlog than we normally do. So I would term it more as timing. And then, the shipment side, I wouldn't say it was any big surprise to us other than we had some customers that had some projects going and asked to have their equipment a little earlier than what they had planned, which would have been into this quarter. Jerry Revich - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: Okay. And in defense -

Hey, Jerry, Q2 orders, too. Maybe we might want to make a comment on that, because it is a tough comp.

Q1.

Q1, yeah.

Q1 of 2019. Yeah. So, if you recall, last year, Jerry, we had an exceptional quarter for orders in our first quarter of fiscal 2019. And back to that timing comment that Wilson made. We don't expect to match that level. But I think, overall, our outlook for the business remains very positive.

Right.

I think the timing that we saw in Q4, at least for some customers, is reflective of their positive view of their businesses and their outlook as they head into 2019. So while it is timing, there is, I think, positive things associated with that timing.

And that tough comp Dave is mentioning, that's the $1.75 billion, right, which everybody that follows us understands, that's really an outsized kind of a value. So... Jerry Revich - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: That was a good quarter.

Yeah. Jerry Revich - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: And in defense, looking at the top line guidance range of $200 million year-over-year growth, JLTV I think is scheduled to be multiples of that in terms of the shipment growth. Can you just talk about what are the headwinds? Is the FHTV business down significantly? Obviously, M-ATV is $100 million hole, but can you just help us, Dave, with the other moving pieces, given the big ramp in JLTV?

Yeah. You're directionally right. As we mentioned, FHTV is going to be down. It's not going to be down what I would say a ton. But we are certainly going to see JLTV step in with its increased volumes and offset both the lower M-ATVs and the lower FHTV volume. And this is really what we had expected all along, as the JLTV is ramping up to be more than half of the new vehicle sales in fiscal 2019. Jerry Revich - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Jerry.

Our next question comes from the line of Neil Frohnapple with Buckingham Research Group. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, guys. Good morning.

Good morning, Neil.

Dave, I wanted to go back to the margin outlook for the JLTV program. It sounds like you're taking a wait-and-see approach here before making adjustments to the profitability outlook for the program. But is timing pushed out just a quarter or two? Can you just help us understand a little bit more here on what else you need to see before adjusting the profitability?

Yeah, Neil, we do look at it every quarter, and we have said in the past that we thought September would be a really good quarter to look at it from a real hard look. We still believe there are opportunities there, and it really comes down to what we said on the call. We have to believe it's achievable and sustainable because we're talking about a program that's an eight-year program. So making a decision on whether we take the margin up, it's not only a reflection of what we're seeing today or the next quarter, but what we think we can sustain and achieve over the full life of that program. So we're looking at things on the materials side. We're looking at things on labor side. We're looking at things on the overhead side. There's a number of areas that we're looking at. The team is driving towards delivering improved performance there. And to narrow it down to will it be this quarter or that quarter, that's a little hard at this time. I guess, what I would leave you with is, again, we do believe there are opportunities out there. But we want to be very comfortable before we bake those into the full program margin.

Okay. That's helpful. And then going back to the access segment margin guidance for FY 2019, could you talk more about what it assumes from a customer mix standpoint, so whether you're assuming more or less IRCs, and also the impact from product mix of teles versus AWPs? Anything unusual there? Or is it just too early to make a call on that?

Yeah. We're going to go back to – it's still early a little bit. So the going-in assumption is relatively similar both customer and product mix for the year. And as we get through these negotiations, we'll certainly tighten that up and as we provide our next update on the outlook for the year on our first quarter earnings call, we'll talk a bit more about that if we see any meaningful changes.

Okay. Thanks. I'll pass it on.

Thanks.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Ann Duignan with JPMorgan. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Good morning, guys

Hi, Ann.

Hi, Ann.

I wonder if you could just comment on the access revenue guidance. What kind of capacity utilization are you running at right now? And have any of these supply chain issues caused you to miss sales? Or are you running kind of flat out and the supply chain issues have just impacted margins if you could just comment on that.

I think, Ann, overall the supply chain challenges have improved as we've gone through the year here. As we talked about earlier, we do expect we are going to continue to see a little bit of that in fiscal 2019. If you go back earlier in the year, we did have some situations where supply chain challenges actually shut down the lines for short periods of times. We believe that's largely behind us now. But there are, again, ongoing challenges associated with that, but it has gotten better.

And we've improved capacity, Ann, as we've got our efficiencies in hand. We talked about hiring around 600 people at JLG last year and getting all those folks trained. We're past that now, and we're seeing the efficiencies come into the right focus. The other thing we did just to make sure that we can cover not only our capacity needs, but also if we need to do some in-sourcing or vertical integration, we're opening up a facility in Tennessee that will be supplying fabricated parts and welding for both JLG and our defense segment. So we feel good about where we are from a capacity standpoint, and going forward here in this next year.

So if orders did increase, you would be able to meet those orders. Is that the way we should interpret it?

Yes, that's correct.

Okay. Thank you. And then, just to follow up on the cost side, can you just describe how your steel purchasing contracts work for access versus defense? I'm just curious, because you're talking about perhaps the opportunity to increase margins in defense however higher input costs are going to weigh on access. Are there differences in the way you've structured the steel purchases for both divisions?

Yeah, in general, and defense is a little bit different given the long-term contract nature of that business. We're able to do things a little bit differently there. If you take our non-defense segments in general, we use a variety of ways that we do procure steel. And one of the main ways, though, is through a series of quarterly locks on pricing. And so that is fairly typical. Others are on an annual basis. But generally, the big differentiating factor between defense and our other businesses is a long-term nature of the defense contracts.

Okay. And does that mean that perhaps the margin weight will be on defense maybe in 2020 or 2021, if steel prices were to stay at current levels?

No. The way the defense contracts work is our government customer allows us to build in price increases on an annual basis. And that is arranged as we're entering the contract. So as a result, we're able to work with our supply base and allow them to put in some price increases as well. It's all factored in when you're looking at in terms of these long-term contracts. So historically, what you would see when we see escalation in steel is in defense is the price increases that are already baked in from a contractual standpoint would help mitigate the impact of that.

Okay. So something like an inflation-based price increase?

Yes, historically.

Escalation clause.

Yeah.

Yeah, okay. Yeah, I understand. Thank you. Appreciate that.

Thanks, Ann.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of David Raso with Evercore ISI. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, good morning.

Hi, David.

I'm just trying to square up your comments you feel the aerial market is strong. But your backlog right now is 25%, 26% of your guidance for access sales. Historically, your backlog going into the year is only 11%, 12% of your eventual access sales. So your backlog is twice as big, let's say, as normal relative to the way you're guiding the sales. And at the same time, I appreciate the idea of price coming in at no margin, given the cost, as you commented earlier. But even if price plus surcharge was 5%, 6%, even if you strip that out, you're implying your margins are flat despite the productivity improvement. So I'm just trying to square up. And I know it's the beginning of the year, you can be conservative. I get it. But just so we walk away, market strong; even pulling out price just offsetting cost, margins flat, and you barely grow. And all I could think is when I look at your share repo, you've got $450 million of free cash flow. You're saying you're just going to do $350 million of repo and the dividend's $20 million. So you're not even spending the free cash flow on the repurchase. So I'm just trying to square up the confidence and the statement about access. And if you are confident, we can make our own view of how conservative guidance is, then why are you not buying back more stock?

Okay, David, I'll start. And Wilson may want to add in. But just on the free cash flow, so $350 million of free cash flow, our dividend for the year is actually going to be around $80 million, not $20 million. So that's $430 million. (49:44)

Oh I'm sorry, yeah. I'm sorry to interrupt. Free cash flow guides $450 million, correct? I thought the – maybe I heard it wrong. I thought the repo guidance was $350 million. Maybe I heard incorrectly?

No, free cash flow guidance is $450 million.

$450 million.

Repurchase is $350 million, dividends are $80 million, so that totals $430 million of cash back to shareholders out of that $450 million. So we're nearly...

I appreciate that, yeah. I misspoke on the dividend.

Pardon?

I misspoke on the dividend. Thank you for that clarification. But the repo and even the dividend, not even quite using the free cash flow in full. Again, I'm just trying to square, am I hearing that as evidence of maybe not quite as confident in the access business as you sounded. That's what I'm trying...

Okay, David.

I don't think we would agree with you. (50:35)

Okay. I'm trying to understand the guidance on aerials.

If we said there was another $20 million that we'll return to shareholders, we would say we're at 100%. So I'm not sure how we can be much more confident than that. In terms of...

But your balance sheet, the net debt to cap is only 11%. You're allowed to go beyond the free cash flow. Again, I'm just – access – if you're confident in that market, just using the free cash flow and even a little less than that for repo and dividend would still suggest we want to run the balance sheet at net debt to cap at 10%/11%.

Our view, David, is this will be the second year in a row that we're returning about 1000% of free cash flow to shareholders. We do believe that is meaningful return of cash, and we do believe that that is a very positive statement about our view of the business. In terms of your question on access equipment overall, between the surcharge price increase, some of the efficiency gains is also likely going to go to help offset the cost increases that we see there. It is a competitive market out there. We also had a couple favorable items in fiscal 2018 that we don't expect to reoccur in 2019. One that I recall in particular was a customer that we had on a deferral basis that they ended up paying us off during the year, and that was a nice bump to earnings in fiscal 2018 that won't reoccur in 2019. And then, you just have some normal wage inflation and other inflationary pressures that are going to also consume some of that improved efficiency benefit that we will see in the year.

Okay. That's helpful. So price cost isn't – at least base case right now, isn't necessarily price offsetting cost. There is a little bit of productivity improvements needed as well to offset the cost?

A little bit, yes.

Okay. Okay, that's helpful. I appreciate it. Thank you so much.

Yeah. Thanks, Dave.

Our next question comes from the line of Seth Weber with RBC. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, good morning, everybody.

Hey, Seth.

Hey, Seth.

Wanted to go back, Wilson, to your comment about this whole negotiations may take longer comment. And just trying to think through why wouldn't you do something different to maybe pivot more to the IRCs away from the national guys? Your backlog is up, I don't know, 90% or something year-over-year, so which I assume is mostly nationals at this point. So strategically, can you just talk through what your options are here? Why wouldn't you pivot more towards the IRCs where you could in theory get better pricing and have a better mix for the year? I guess, my first question.

Yeah. Seth, you know us, we're not going to tell you our strategy over a call like this. I have a feeling we have a few friends listening here on what we're doing. But we look at all customers and look at all opportunities. This is going to be, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, this is tough year. This is going to be a tough year. But you understand, and our customers, I believe, understand that these are significant cost increases. We buy our – we buy U.S. steel. And it's up 40% to 50%. Steel plate, which we buy a lot of, is right at 50% increase year-over-year. So you can't mitigate that type of cost increase. The freight increases, you just can't do that inside your company when the market is moving like it is. So we're laying all that out with all customers. It's not just NRCs. It's all the IRCs, too. We want to make sure we're transparent with what we're facing and work with our customers to bridge over this price cost issue. So yes, we have all kinds of different strategies and pivots that we're doing, but it's just not anything that we're going to go into detail on a call like this.

Okay. I appreciate that. Maybe just switching over to defense. Is there any disclosure you'd be willing to talk to about your Saudi Arabia exposure? Whether there's any Saudi exposure in your backlog or how you're thinking about sales there for this year?

Sure, Seth. Obviously, we're sensitive to this issue and watching it closely on how our U.S. government is reacting to what's in front of them today. We only have a couple of small contracts with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia right now. I would say, they're very small in nature. So nothing as far as any type of large exposure at this time.

Okay, guys. All right. Thanks very much.

Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Charley Brady with SunTrust Robinson Humphrey. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks. Good morning, guys.

Hey, Charley.

Hey, Charley.

Just, I guess, a couple quick ones from me. On the fire business, can you just quantify the deferrals or the push-outs that you had from Q4 into 2019? Is that all going to get recognized in Q1?

It's about $20 million, Charley. I think a majority of that will get recognized in the first quarter.

Okay. Thanks. And also in fire, we heard from one of the suppliers into the fire market earlier on their earnings call, saying that they were hearing from the fire OEMs. There were supply chain constraints that was helping to build backlogs at the OEMs. I'm just wondering, from a supply chain perspective, is that something you're seeing on the fire business specifically that's impacting any of the ability to get stuff out the door?

No, Charley. We haven't seen anything significant. There's the routine supplier issues that we go through in all of our facilities. But there's been no big event, or big supply, or shortfall in fire & emergency.

Okay. Thanks. And one more on access. Have you quantified the price increase surcharges you're going to be putting through in the next round?

I'll share that with you now. No one has asked that question to this point. So recall we went out with a 4.5% surcharge last spring. We're going to keep that in place for steel, with the hopes that that steel will moderate down. That way, we can adjust that pricing for our customers. And then, we've gone out with, what I would call, a low-single-digit price increase to cover the other inflationary issues, and that will go into effect January 1.

Thanks a lot.

Thanks, Charley.

Thanks, Charley.

Our next question comes from the line of Chad Dillard with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Good morning, everyone.

Hi, Chad.

So just on the commercial side, it looks like you're guiding to a pretty healthy step-up in margins there. Can you just walk through what's driving that? To what extent, is it mix versus more international sales? And secondly, just switching over to the access side. Can you just talk about how much in your bookings in 4Q was driven by IRCs versus NRCs, and to what extent are you seeing maybe a pull forward ahead of pricing?

Okay, Chad. On commercial for 2019, the main thing that's driving our improved outlook there is just continued execution really of their simplification journey. It's something that they kicked off in a real big way in fiscal 2018. They made some benefits from that. And this is just taking it into the second year, I would say, of that. So we think the team is headed in the right direction. We've seen what this can do when we look at the fire & emergency segment. We're not necessarily saying they're going to get to the same margin levels as F&E, but we do believe that that segment can get up to double-digit operating income margins. And then, can you please repeat your question on access?

Yeah. So just on the booking side for 4Q, I just wanted to get a sense for what the mix was between IRC versus NRC, and to what extent are you seeing any potential pull forward ahead of the next model year?

We did see a little stronger IRC mix in the quarter year-over-year, but it was not that significant. So not overall a big driver, as we look at the improvement. And then, in terms of the pull ahead, I don't really think we're seeing that. We do believe, as Wilson mentioned earlier, some timing out there. But we've delivered strong growth throughout this year. We think that's going to continue into the first quarter of fiscal 2019. But no real indications of a pull ahead. The price increase has been out there. It's been announced. The surcharge has been out there for six months. So at this point, there's not a lot to get ahead of, so to speak.

Got it. Okay. And then, secondly, can you just walk through your expectations for the price/cost cadence in access as we go through 2019. I mean, it sounds like you'll see a little bit more pressure in the first quarter. I just want to understand how that builds through the year. And if you can hit more normalized incremental margins at the back end of the year?

Yeah. The first quarter certainly will be the biggest challenge associated with that, and that's largely due to having several hundred million dollars of backlog that was in place for fiscal 2019 at the time we implemented the surcharge. And we've talked about that before. But after we get through the first quarter, we believe we should have a pretty good alignment of the cost/price dynamic there to offset those. And again, as we mentioned earlier, some of the efficiency improvements helping to contribute to a little bit of that. The other segment I would call out just to make sure everybody's aware is just fire & emergency, with their significant backlogs, they're going be looking at really almost going through the first half of the fiscal year before they start to benefit from their surcharges really kicking in.

Great. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Mig Dobre with Robert W. Baird & Company. Please proceed with your question. Mig Dobre - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Hey, thanks for fitting me in. A lot's been asked already. So just two quick ones. I guess, on your discussions in access equipment with NRCs, you mentioned that they're taking a little bit longer. And I'm wondering if that has – if that's primarily a factor of price adjustments? Or if there are other things, the M&A in the space and so on and so forth that are contributing to this?

I don't think it's anything outside of what we go through every year, Mig, is remember they're finishing their year, and we're trying to call our next year. So I think with the close of their year, that always adds complication. And then, just digesting the difference in cost that we're presenting. I think they're going in and evaluating that. They're starting to build their budgets. And so it's just requiring what I would call a few extra meetings. If you think about sharing the data that I talked about earlier on steel, on freight, we're going in from a transparent standpoint and just sharing the actual information that we have, that we're working with, with our supplier partners. So I would just say, there's a lot more involved in the discussions this year than in the past because of this price/cost issue. And that is taking a few more meetings. Mig Dobre - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Do you think that changes the normal seasonality of the orders? And I understand the comps are a little bit strange as we look forward. But if we adjust for that, do you expect a different seasonal cadence to your orders through 2019?

Well, again, it's early, Mig, for us to call that. I wouldn't expect it to be as nontraditional this year as it was last year. But like we talked about in our Q4, we had some customers that had some opportunities and wanted to pull some of their orders from Q1 into Q4. I think we're going to continue to see some of that behavior in 2019. Mig Dobre - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: Understood. And then, lastly, in fire, two of your pretty large competitors obviously are struggling with some issues, being able to ship product and such. I'm wondering if you're viewing this as an opportunity for share as you look into 2019. And maybe what made your operations different do you think than some of your peers that have struggled?

Well, you know us, Mig, we're not going to comment on our competitors. But what I will tell you is Pierce has been gaining share. And I know that's their plan to continue gaining share with some of their new product introductions along with just the good operational efficiencies that are driving through their simplification effort. So the plan is to continue to grow share there, and I would expect that you will be hearing more about that through this next year. Mig Dobre - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.: All right. Thank you.

Thanks, Mig.

Thanks, Mig.

Our next question comes from the line of Ross Gilardi with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please proceed with your question.

Well, thanks for squeezing me in, guys. Appreciate it.

Sure.

I just want to ask on defense. There was news, I think, about a month ago, that I think the DoD might reallocate some budget away from the JLTV. Is there any merit to that speculation? And if that happens, is there any risk to the rest of the shipments for the duration of this contract? Or is that something that would be relevant when the contract comes back for rebid in like 2022, or out there several years?

Well, yeah, we read a little bit about that, Ross, and a lot of speculation, rumor. But if that were to be put into effect, really, the quantities are still well above what the original 16,901 were. So at this time, we're obviously going to monitor that closely. But we don't see any kind of issue with our current program that we have on record today.

Okay. Thanks, Wilson. And just on access – sorry to beat a dead horse. But the rental companies – and this is probably a lot of public posturing that's going on as you guys are negotiating this, but are talking about flattish pricing from their – flattish cost inflation from their key suppliers into 2019. Have your expectations on pricing come down at all versus a few months ago? And as far as you can tell, are you seeing your competitors match the type of price increases that you're talking about? Or are you seeing any early evidence of a scramble for market share?

Well, I'm going to let you ask our competitors what they're doing in the area of pricing. And as you know, I'm not going to comment on a customer. But, Ross, when you look at where we are, we have premium brands. We've given a wider range in 2019, because we know the importance of being disciplined and protecting our margins, it may cause us to lose some share. That's never optimal. But we believe it's important for our shareholders. It's important for the long term equity of our brand. We're going to continue to invest in innovation and best-in-class aftermarket service support to further develop this total cost of ownership model we have, because we believe that's what wins in the long-term. That's what will drive the best customer experience for our customers. So no one likes a price increase. But, as you know, these costs are real. So we're going to go out and do our best to be disciplined and that's our plan, is to capture that cost issue. As Dave mentioned, we're not trying to grow margins here. We're trying to cover our costs. And we think that's fair. And again, I won't speak for our competitors. I'll let you ask them that question. But that's our plan going forward.

Great. Thanks, Wilson.

Thanks, Ross.

Ladies and gentlemen, we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. And I would like to turn the call back to management for closing remarks.

I want to thank everyone for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you at a conference or our next earnings call. Have a great day.

This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.