Thanks, Andrew. It's worth addressing from the top that, because of the mid quarter closing of the Musselwhite acquisition in February, we acknowledged that this is a transitional, and complex reporting period, and that is reflected in our financial results. During the quarter, we sold 46,000 ounces of gold at realized price of $2,915 per ounce, resulting in approximately $141 million in revenue for the quarter. This include one month of Musselwhite gold sales. Cash cost and all-in sustaining costs, for the first quarter totaled $597 and $845 per ounce, of gold sold respectively. And it's important to note that cash costs, and all-in sustaining costs for the quarter, do not include the impact of Musselwhite, as the closing of the transaction during the quarter, resulted in one-time non-cash accounting treatments impacting cost of sales. So as a result, we felt that the calculation in cash costs, and all-in sustaining costs at Musselwhite, would not be representative of the performance of the mine, for that period. But starting in the second quarter, Musselwhite cost will be included in the computation of both cash costs, and all-in sustaining costs. We recorded a net loss for the quarter of $70 million, or $0.22 per share, mainly driven by the impact of financial instruments, issued in connection with the acquisition of Musselwhite. So after adjusting for the impact of these financial instruments, and a few other small items, our adjusted net earnings were $38.6 million, or $0.12 per share. Cash flow from operating activities, before changes in non-cash working capital, was $401 million, or $1.24 per share for the quarter. This was impacted by the proceeds received from the gold prepay, and I'll expand on that on the next slide. Our total capital expenditures for the quarter, including capitalized exploration, were $17.7 million, of which $9.2 million was non-sustaining, and related to capitalized exploration in Mexico, and also related to the purchase of water rights in Nevada. And also $8.5 million was sustaining, which the majority was relating to the mine development, and equipment purchases at Musselwhite. On the next slide, we're showing the reconciliation of net income to adjusted earnings. The point here, is to highlight some of the significant items, specifically related to the Musselwhite acquisition, which impacted our net earnings this quarter. Items such as transaction costs, and the fair value adjustment of the metal inventory, or one-time items, but there are certain financial instruments that will be fluctuating each quarter, and we're providing a breakdown of those on the next two slides. So as a result of the closing of the Musselwhite transaction, we recorded charges of $81 million, related to changes in the fair value of financial instruments, issued in connection with the acquisition. This includes the closing out of the go forward contracts, which we have now replaced by the gold prepay, the warrants and the redemption right issued in conjunction, with the convertible notes, and a contingent payment portion of the Musselwhite purchase price. So although the gold prepay, is considered more of a financing item, because it's treated as deferred revenue, and not a financial instrument, it will now flow through cash flow from operating activities. Therefore, as we continue to deliver gold ounces against the prepay obligation, we'll draw down deferred revenue on the balance sheet, and we'll recognize that revenue on the income statement. But since we won't be receiving cash for those ounces delivered, it will reduce our cash flow from operating activities accordingly. The contingent consideration associated with the purchase price of Musselwhite, is recorded as a liability that is re-estimated every quarter. And since the contingent consideration is linked to gold price, as the gold price increases, the probability of payment also increases, and therefore, our financial liability increases as well. This is mark-to-market each quarter based mainly on gold price performance. Also note that this liability, is capped at $40 million, of which we have recognized $28 million to-date. And the last item to mention, is the impact of the warrants we issued in conjunction with the convertible notes. As the warrants are denominated in Canadian dollars, and AutoCanada is a U.S. functional currency entity, the warrants are treated as a financial instrument and therefore, mark-to-market each quarter. And with the recent share price performance, this has created an increase in the liability of that financial instrument. That treatment will remain in place until the earlier, of the exercise of those warrants, or their expiry. So we've added some more details on each item in the table on the next slide for added clarity, but we are available to discuss the accounting mechanics, of these adjustments in more detail at any time, so please do not hesitate to reach out to us. Following the closing of the acquisition of Musselwhite, the company's current outstanding debt balance is $450 million with net debt of approximately $266 million. Our cash balance at the end of the first quarter was $184 million. We intend to use our strong cash generation from our two operations now, to delever in the near term, while we also prepared to fund the construction of our South Railroad Project and a robust exploration program, which our Senior Vice President, Exploration, Sylvain Guerard, will now provide you with an update.