Yes, Bob, great question. So I like your phrase stubbornly high. It has been stubbornly high. I agree with that. From my view, very, very stubbornly high, but that's where it's been. But it has declined, and that is leading to an increased percentage of vehicles being returned. However, the percentage being returned is still way below normal. So that's why our volumes, as I said, are still about 50% below what I'd say, our off-lease volume is still about 50% below normal, even with the increase in Q1.
Then, Bob, in terms of the timing, in Q1, typically, there's a spring market phenomenon, as you know, in our industry, and that typically supports prices in Q1. So the equity gap didn't really decline that much in Q1. In fact, by some metrics, increased a little bit again, like it did in Q1 of last year.
But the expectation, I think, from speaking to some of our Finance customers is that the equity -- this equity gap will, over time, continue to decline. And I think 2 reasons for that. One is continued downward pressure on new used vehicle prices, as dealers have more cars on their lot, as manufacturers put more incentives on new cars, that flows through into being downward pressure on used vehicle prices. So there's probably some level of that that will still take place here. And then secondly, as we're sort of lapping new cohorts of leases that were written, they were sold at higher prices, higher average transaction prices and leased at higher residual values. So I think the expectation, Bob, is that ultimately, this will all kind of revert to normal, but it's going to take time.
And -- but we're obviously dealing with that and obviously trying to maximize our performance given the constraints that exist at the moment. But I'm pleased with at least some of the breaks that we saw in Q1.