Greetings, and welcome to the OPKO Health third quarter 2014 financial results conference call. (Operator Instructions) I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Steve Rubin, Executive Vice President of Administration. Thank you, Mr. Rubin. You may now begin.

Thank you, and good morning. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that any statements made during this call, which are historical will be considered forward-looking, and as such will be subject to risk and uncertainties, which could materially affect our expected results, including without limitation the various risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and our subsequent filings with the SEC. I'd like to briefly discuss the format for today's call. I will start the call with a brief overview, and Adam Logal, our Chief Financial Officer will then talk about our financial results for the quarter. Charlie Bishop, the CEO of our Renal Division will provide a brief update on our Rayaldee development program; followed by David Okrongly, President of our Diagnostics Division, who will provide an update of our diagnostics projects; and Dr. Frost will follow-up with a wrap up. We have the entire team here with us to answer any questions you might have after our prepared remarks. And with that, I'll turn it over to Adam Logal, our CFO.

Thank you, Steve, and good morning, everyone. OPKO's pharmaceutical operating units continue to show positive results during the three and nine month periods, with increases of $0.7 million and $7.8 million in year-over-year product revenue growth, principally driven by growth at our FineTech API business. Pharmaceutical product revenue grew, despite foreign currency pressure impacting our Latin American businesses in comparison to the 2013 periods. Total revenue for the three and nine months of 2014 was $19.8 million and $65.6 million compared to $20.6 million and $75.8 million for the comparable periods of 2013. The three and nine months of 2013 included non-recurring license revenue of $1.3 million and $15.7 million related to our 2013 transactions with Pharmsynthez and RXi Pharmaceuticals. We continue to see increases in the adoption of the 4Kscore Test in the United States and we launched the 4Kscore Test in Europe in mid-September. We expect to launch in Latin America later this year. In addition, we also anticipate receiving the first milestone during the fourth quarter from TESARO, now that its NDA has been accepted by the FDA as announced last week. Turning to our operating expenses. We had several events during the period that I would like to highlight. As a result of our successful Phase 3 critical trials for Rayaldee, our net loss for the three and nine months of 2014 includes an increase in valuation of our contingent consideration payable to the sellers of Cytochroma. This increase in value is the result of a significant increase in the probability of future development milestones being met as a result of the success of the clinical trials. The three and nine month periods include $17.7 million and $19 million of contingent consideration expense related to the increase in fair value of future payments to the sellers…

Thanks, Adam. Good morning. I'm pleased to report that OPKO is making great strides in moving Rayaldee closer to commercialization in the U.S. Since the last earnings call, we have reached two important milestones in our Phase 3 clinical program. In August and September, we reported positive topline data from the two pivotal Phase 3 trials. And as of today, we have generated sufficient safety data from the ongoing open-label extension of these trials, to enable our forthcoming submission of a new drug application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. By the way, I'm pleased to confirm that our preparation of the NDA is well-advanced. Our targeted submission date is prior to yearend, which will put the NDA in a position to be filed by the FDA in the first quarter of 2015. We also have reached two other milestones that are needed prior to NDA submission. We held a successful pre-NDA meeting with the FDA, during which we reached agreement on all points regarding the forthcoming NDA. And we successfully completed an FDA mandated carcinogenicity study of calcifediol, the active ingredient in Rayaldee. The study concluded that calcifediol showed no neoplastic activity through the highest dose, which was 33-fold higher than the maximum therapeutic dose. As you may know, the FDA likes to see at least a 10-fold margin of safety. Further, in August, we submitted a new investigation on new drug application to the FDA for Rayaldee, as an adjunctive therapy for cancer patients. The IND described the study, which will examine the safety of escalating Rayaldee doses in patients with prostate or breast cancer that is metastasize to bone, and who require treatment with antiresorptive or bone-sparing agents. This is the first trial intended to expand the potential market for Rayaldee beyond chronic kidney disease. The…

Thank you very much, Charlie. Good morning, everybody. My name is David Okrongly, and I am President of OPKO Diagnostics. For the next several minutes, I'll give you an update on our commercial activities related to the 4Kscore Test, OPKO's blood test for accurately identifying risk of aggressive prostate cancer, and also update you on the clinical validation activities related to the Claros 1, our physician office blood analyzer. I'll start with the 4Kscore Test. We began the commercial rollout in May of this year, really with the announcement at the AUA of our clinical trial results, and we continue to move forward with over 360 physicians now having ordered the test. And importantly, now we're seeing that many are now incorporating the 4Kscore into their routine clinical practice. Our sales effort, while still relatively small with only 10 field reps, will continue to grow, as we progress on our reimbursement of the test with both public and private payers. On the topic of reimbursement, our plan for both Medicare and private insurance coverage for the 4Kscore Test has continued to progress on schedule. This morning, our announcing that we have an online publication of the OPKO U.S. clinical validation trial, now out in European Urology. European Urology is the highest scientific impact factor urology journal in the world, and having access to a published peer review paper on our U.S. clinical trial data is very important. The payers have requested peer review publication of the U.S. data to compliment the European data that we've talked about in the past. We expect this development to be extremely helpful for our future discussions with payers. And importantly with the 1,000 patients that were enrolled in the U.S. clinical trial, we expect to have a number of other studies emanating from that…

Thank you, David. I'd like to just give you my perspective of what's going on at OPKO now. First of all, we have always been interested in working on big projects. What do I mean by big projects? I mean those that have potential for large sales and profits worldwide. Also in my mind it's important for a small company like OPKO to focus on products that have low developmental risk, which I think applies to all of our projects. And on the other hand, when they come to market to be marketed to a very small, relatively small, that is field of physicians and surgeons. So for example with the 4Kscore, we are marketing and selling to the urologists. Eventually, the community of physicians using the test will be expanded. With Rayaldee, we're marketing to the nephrologists. So we're already beginning our marketing strategy. We have onboard one of the top people in the field, who has had great experience in introducing vitamin D products for other companies. With the growth hormone product that we are working on that has not been mentioned yet, that would be marketed to endocrinologists. And by the way that project is moving along very nicely in its clinical trials. Factor VII for hemophilia will begin clinical trials early next year we hope, and will be marketed to hematologists. Now, on an opportunistic basis, we always consider an opportunity to license, as we've done with Rolapitant, which we've licensed to TESARO. And as we've announced previously, their NDA has been filed and now accepted, and as you heard will begin to receive milestone payments very shortly. And other product that will be entering clinical trials next year that is slightly different in terms of the marketing effort is Oxyntomodulin. Oxyntomodulin for overweight and obesity…

(Operator Instructions) Our first question is from Kevin DeGeeter of Ladenburg.

This is actually [ph] Jake Kolbe on for Kevin this morning. The first is for the Phase 1 study in long-acting Factor VII. Could you talk about the study design and whether the study would be in patients with active disease or healthy controls?

We are still working on the design of the trial. It's with the phase of organizing discussions with the experts in the field. So come back to us during the next call.

And then secondly, can you discuss on the current pre-launch marketing plans for Rayaldee? Specifically, any thoughts to the timeline insights of the sales force?

We are sizing our sales force now. It would be very similar to the sizes of the sales forces that other companies have used that address the nephrology, endocrinology's phase. The most recent example, of course that you're aware of is Curaxys just hired their sales force, most of these sales forces have between 60 and 100 personnel and ours will be similar.

The next question is from Eun Yang of Jefferies.

This is John Ryan for Eun. Just a couple of quick questions. Any caller on what your 4Kscore sales were in third quarter?

We haven't specifically broken out 4Kscore revenue yet, John. So we're still seeing, continuing to see revenue build, as I mentioned as Dave highlighted. But we're not specifically calling out the revenue numbers.

Now, with 4Kscore Test validation study published, any color on how you might expect commercial reimbursement trajectory to proceed and when you might expect meaningful revenues?

The publications, one of the key milestones that reimbursement agencies are looking for, we have, of course the nine peer review publications out of Europe, so this is really kind of the cherry on top, if you will, for all the clinical validation. We also have the long-term outcomes data now starting to emerge in the published literature. I think from a peer review publication perspective we're very strong. We're really ready to go. I mentioned the NCCN guidelines meeting, which was held on November 5. This is one of the leading guidelines for determining care and management of prostate cancer, such a early disease, and the mountain of evidence we think will be more than sufficient to get us into the guidelines; another important check the box for the reimbursement agencies. And now having been in front of the AMA CPT editorial board; we have a Category III code that we can use to start the discussion with the reimbursement agencies about how to pay the bill. So it looks to us very much like our 2015 will be a year where we start to see an increasing number, beginning with Medicare and some of the privates for coverage for the test, so 2015 for us is really going to be, I think the breakout year, because one of the major objections we hear obviously talking to urologists is that if the test recovered, I would have a very easy time with getting my patients to use the test. We're still seeing though with the urologist who are adopting the test that about 50% of the patients presented with the 4Kscore Test as an option for them will actually pay the out-of-pocket $395.

And then just a couple of quick further ones. Under CMS coverage how much is the 4Kscore co-pay and then when are you planning to file for PMA approval for 4Kscore now that Phase 3 data has been published?

Right now the patient is paying $395 out-of-pocket for the test. Our list price on the test is more than that. The negotiations about how we would get reimbursed for the test will take several different forms and that's yet to be discussed with CMS any kind of detail. Sorry, your second question was related to --

Just on potential filing for PMA approval for 4Kscore.

So the 4Kscore is a laboratory developed test, and so we fall under CLIA guidelines, not under FDA guidelines for introducing that test. And as an advanced diagnostic laboratory test, which is specific category of diagnostic test carved out in the new panel law will continue to move in that direction, of course paying very close attention to FDA and their guidelines that they have announced about regulation of laboratory developed test. We're confident that the way we've conducted all of our clinical work related to the U.S. trial would definitely stand must with FDA in any kind of a PMA process, but exactly how those guidelines get implemented and exactly how they apply to a diagnostic like the 4Kscore Test is yet to be determined.

And then lastly, any color on the trial design, trial study for Oxyntomodulin? And just more broadly, are you planning to out-license products like Rayaldee growth hormone and Factor VII programs? I'll jump back in the queue.

So far is the Oxyntomodulin, again we're not yet at the point of designing the trials. The FDA does have some guidelines as to what they require for approval of the drug to treat overweight and obesity. But again, there is a group of great experts in the field that we want to convene to go over the study designs. What was the other question?

Out license?

Out licensing, yes. I would just say this that we received expressions of interest frequently from companies that are interested in our products for distribution and they come from American companies, and very often companies outside of the United States. And we consider them all. And at the moment we haven't signed any agreements of this sort, but we'll be sure to let you know as soon as we do, if we do.

And the next question is from Rohit Vanjani of Oppenheimer.

Dave, so any details on the progression on the testing orders of the 4Kscore, I mean as you move from 2Q to 3Q and then 3Q to 4Q. I think you were anticipating a ramp after AUA. Has that ramp continued in 3Q and then into 4Q?

Yes. We've seen a very steady progression on the ramp. And we've now hit a pretty strong growth curve. What we're doing now is actually targeting markets around the United States, where we believe the test will be particularly strong in adoption. And we're putting concentrated sales efforts into these markets to kick the slope of that growth curve up even higher.

And then you launched in Spain, I believe in mid-September you said, and you were moving to Portugal, Italy, France. Have you moved in to any of those places and have you recorded sales in any European country yet?

Well, we've recorded sales in Spain, and that's been the concentration of the OPKO Health Spain sales force. And right now it's really developing the market with a couple of the key opinion leaders in Spain, in anticipation of the EAU next year, where the test will get a lot more broader broadcast in both, amongst the urologist of Europe and moving to test into other countries in Europe. Right now, our focus is on Spain in getting a cadre of key opinion leaders in Spain adopting the test, which is actually going quite well.

And then, how would you describe pricing there in Spain? And then where do you anticipate it to go from here?

We've priced it identically in Spain as in United States. So it's €295 out-of-pocket expense for the test.

And do you expect that to hold going forward?

Yes, we do. The value of the test we think goes well beyond, with the patients are paying out-of-pocket. And I just said, in the U.S. the reaction is very similar to that in Europe, so what we've seen in the U.S. where particularly men who have anxiety about an elevated PSA or have had a prior biopsy, the €295 is something they'll readily pay for the test.

And then on the CPT code issuance. I believe I heard that you had your CPT editorial panel meeting, and that you got issuance. I thought it took a couple of months for them to get back to you. What was the reason that they got back to you so quickly, I guess on the issuance?

Well, they get back to you quickly just to say that you were accepted. The publication takes some time and we expect the publication of the actual CPT code to take place some time in the January, February timeframe.

And then on Claros 1, I think I heard you say, you were going to file testosterone in 2Q '15 and then PAS in 3Q '15. Does that mean we won't see sales on Claros 1 until 2016? Is it three to six months for the filing?

We should see sales in 2015. The testosterone test has actually taken a much more and more importance as time continues to go on, both in monitoring men on androgen deprivation therapy, and then on testosterone replacement therapy, and also alongside of PSA when men are being tested after diagnosis of prostate cancer and are perhaps on active surveillance. So we're seeing testosterone interest growing and we expect that once we have approval for testosterone that will give us the opportunity to place the test toward the second half of 2015.

And then I guess, Steve, this is for you. For human growth hormone, I think the Phase 3, you said it continues to advance, Phase 2 for peds where we saw interim data. When we can see the Phase 3 trial results, I guess? And how long before we see the Phase 2 in peds the full data?

The full data will come out early next year for the Phase 2. Obviously, we continue to, when go to conferences, including one recently in Singapore, we disclosed more and more of the data as it becomes available. We actually had some nine month data at our last presentation, but the full set of data will be early next year. The Phase 3 data obviously is blinded, it's a six-month, and we continue to enroll well, but it's going to be I would say second half of next year, before we have any topline data disclosure on the adult.

So would we still anticipate sales in 2016 for human growth hormone in the adult indication?

Yes.

And then, lastly for Charlie, what's the update on the Alpharen trials. Is there any update there?

Yes, Rohit, the Fermagate trial, Alpharen trial is scheduled to start Q1 in 2015. So this will be a Phase 3 trial that addresses, as I mentioned, global approvals. We're thinking U.S. and Europe primarily.

Thank you. We have no further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the floor back over to management for any closing remarks.

Thank you all for attending and we look forward to being in touch with you next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. And thank you for your participation.