Good morning, and welcome to Oncolytics Biotech Inc.'s fourth quarter and full year 2024 conference call. All participants are in a listen-only mode. There will be a question and answer session at the end of the call. Please be advised that this call is being recorded at the company's request. I would now like to turn the call over to Jon Patton, director of investor relations and communications. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Oncolytics Biotech Inc.'s fourth quarter and full year 2024 earnings call. As a reminder, various remarks made during this call contain certain forward-looking statements relating to the company's business prospects and the development and commercialization of pelareorep, including statements regarding the company's mission, strategy, and milestones, the company's belief as to the potential and mechanism of action of pelareorep as a cancer therapeutic, our search for a new permanent CEO, our potential registrational opportunities for pelareorep, and our plans and strategies related thereto, the potential market for pelareorep in breast cancer, plans to continue enrollment in goblet cohort five, our ongoing business development initiatives, and other statements related to anticipated developments in the company's business. These statements are based on management's current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of factors which involve known and unknown risks, delays, uncertainties, and other factors not under the company's control. These may cause actual results, performance, or achievements of the company to be materially different from results, performance, or expectations implied by these forward-looking statements. In any forward-looking statement in which Oncolytics Biotech Inc. expresses an expectation or belief as to future results, such expectations or beliefs are expressed in good faith. Our beliefs have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that these statements, expectations, or beliefs will be achieved. These factors include results of current or pending clinical trials, associated with intellectual property protection, financial projections, actions by regulatory agencies, and those other factors detailed in the company's filings with the SEDAR and the SEC. Our clients do not undertake any obligation to update these forward-looking statements except as required by applicable laws. Joining me this morning to discuss our recent accomplishments, in addition to what we are looking forward to in 2025, are chairman of Oncolytics Biotech Inc.'s board of directors and interim CEO, Wayne Pisano, chief medical officer, Dr. Thomas Heineman, chief financial officer, Kirk Look, and vice president, business development, Christophe Degois. To get started, I would like to hand it to Wayne who will provide us with an introduction and overview. Wayne?

Thanks, Jon. And thanks everyone for joining our 2024 year-end conference call. First, I would like to reiterate my and the entire team's best wishes for Dr. Matthew Coffey, as he focuses full-time on his recovery. Many of you know that Matthew is a co-founder of the company and he has a passion for improving the lives of cancer patients. So this is not a decision that was taken lightly. Matthew's knowledge and expertise on pelareorep and immuno-oncology is impressive. He will always be a strong advocate of pelareorep and we anticipate that he will support Oncolytics Biotech Inc. in an advisory role later this year. We are actively searching for a chief executive officer to lead the company's advancement of our novel therapeutic agent pelareorep, or PELA as we refer to it. We believe the opportunity for PELA is very compelling as we see the potential for an accelerated approval pathway in HR-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Our exciting work in gastrointestinal tumors continues to garner attention from collaborators like GCAR and PanCAN in addition to key opinion leaders in the field. I will leave it to Thomas to discuss our clinical data in more detail, but I would like to highlight that in 2024, we generated final data in the BRACELET-1 breast cancer study that not only met but exceeded our expectations. We also furthered our work in GI cancers with the ongoing goblet study. Initial safety and efficacy data in both pancreatic and anal cancers are positive. After Thomas, Christophe will provide us with an overview of our business development progress, and Kirk will discuss our financials. I would like to remind everyone that on our last call, Christophe provided a detailed analysis of the breast cancer market. Even with the introduction of the ADCs, breast cancer remains an unmet medical need for many patients. We estimate that as many as 55,000 breast cancer patients would benefit from pelareorep. The efficacy data generated in both breast and gastrointestinal cancer trials demonstrate the potential of pelareorep in hard-to-treat and very diverse tumor types. We remain focused on advancing the development of pelareorep for cancer patients and value generation for our shareholders. I will now turn it over to Thomas to discuss our clinical program updates. Thomas?

Thanks, Wayne. The recent impactful GI data that Wayne mentioned were presented in late January at the ASCO GI Conference. From goblet Cohort four, which investigates PELA and the checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab in relapsed anal cancer, we reported a 33% objective response rate from the 12 evaluable patients, including a complete response that lasted more than 15 months. In addition, we reported translational data from this cohort showing the expansion of new and pre-existing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes clones in the blood of patients who responded to treatment with pelareorep combined with atezolizumab. We also saw the upregulation of multiple cytokines, including IL-10 and IL-11, as well as PD-L1 and interferon gamma. These results from patients with relapsed anal cancer support PELA's immunologic mechanism of action as previously defined in other cancers. Specifically, they demonstrate PELA's ability to enhance antitumor T cell responses and its complementary effect of making tumors visible to the immune system. In addition, these findings provide evidence of PELA's ability to synergize with checkpoint inhibitors in cancers that have historically resisted immune therapies. We have begun enrollment into stage two of this Simon two-stage study, which will provide data from an additional 18 patients. We believe the confirmation of the efficacy signal from these patients would provide a strong foundation for a subsequent registrational trial in anal cancer. At ASCO GI this past January, we also presented safety results from goblet cohort five. In this cohort, patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer are being treated with PELA combined with modified FOLFIRINOX either with or without atezolizumab in two treatment arms. No safety signals were observed during the safety run-in period, and both an independent data safety monitoring board and the German regulatory authorities have approved the cohort to continue the full enrollment. We are now working towards achieving the…

Thanks, Thomas. I am happy to be here with you today to provide the latest update on our ongoing business development conversations. Since our last earnings call, we have continued to communicate to potential biopharma partners the substantial clinical benefit PELA has demonstrated across multiple hard-to-treat indications. However, breast cancer is our highest priority. This is because we have data showing patient benefit in two randomized breast cancer studies that exceed 100 patients. Also, after discussion with regulators and key opinion leaders, we know where PELA should be positioned in the ever-evolving breast cancer treatment paradigm. As for the clinical benefit and the final BRACELET-1 data reported this past fall, PELA combined with paclitaxel showed a greater than 12-month estimated advantage over paclitaxel monotherapy. However, as Thomas mentioned, we also saw meaningful benefit in objective response rates, PFS, and 12- and 24-month overall survival. Our expected positioning of PELA in the treatment paradigm is for it to follow hormonal treatment like endocrine therapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors, and targeted therapy. An antibody-drug conjugate like Enhertu. However, some patients may not be eligible for or cannot tolerate ADCs. So once a patient is eligible for chemotherapy, PELA would be a natural fit as our data with paclitaxel shows a robust benefit over paclitaxel monotherapy. As I discussed in great detail on our previous call, this is where we anticipate there will be 55,000 addressable breast cancer patients in the U.S. by 2027, and the potential for $2.4 billion in annual sales across the U.S. and major European markets by 2033. Another important aspect of our BD conversation centers around where we will take PELA next on the regulatory pathway. After multiple discussions with key opinion leaders and statisticians, we have designed a registration-enabling breast cancer study that could generate a PFS endpoint within…

Thanks, Christophe. And good morning, everyone. I will now discuss our financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2024, which will be provided in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. A full summary of our financial results can be found on the Investors section of our website under filings and reports, or in the press release issued earlier this morning. Throughout 2024, we remained cautious with our cash resources. As of December 31, 2024, the company reported $15.9 million in cash and cash equivalents. Net cash used in operating activities for 2024 totaled $27 million compared to $28.4 million for 2023, reflecting non-cash working capital changes partially offset by higher net operating activities in 2024. Now, general and administrative expenses for the fourth quarter of 2024 were $3.9 million compared with $4.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. The decrease was mainly attributed to lower personnel-related expenses along with lower cash annual short-term incentive awards. The decrease is partially offset by higher share-based compensation expense. Research and development expenses for the fourth quarter of 2024 were $4.6 million compared to $4.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. The decrease was due to lower personnel-related expenses, related to lower cash annual short-term incentive awards, mainly offset by higher clinical trial expenses and share-based payment compensation expense. Net loss for the fourth quarter of 2024 was $8 million compared to a net loss of $3.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. The basic and diluted loss per share was $0.10 in the fourth quarter of 2024, compared to a basic and diluted loss per share of $0.05 in the fourth quarter of 2023. For the full year 2024, net loss totaled $31.7 million compared to $27.8 million in 2023, or $0.41 per share on a basic and fully diluted basis. As we look forward to 2025, we are confident in the vast potential that PELA holds for improving patient outcomes. We are making progress as shown by the recent data in pancreatic and anal cancers announced at ASCO GI, and we are dedicated to advancing PELA as effectively and efficiently as possible. Now before we wrap up today's call, I would like to thank everyone who continues to support our efforts, from patients, providers, and caregivers to our dedicated employees and most importantly, our steadfast shareholders. On behalf of the entire management team at Oncolytics Biotech Inc., thank you again for taking the time to join us today. Now, I would like to open the call up for Q&A. Operator?

Thank you. And ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press the star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing any keys. To withdraw your question, you may press the star followed by the number two. Once again, please press the star one to join the queue. One moment please for your first question. And your first question comes from the line of Michael Freeman with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good morning, Kirk, Wayne, Thomas, Christophe, Jon. Congratulations on closing out a strong year 2024, and looking like an action-packed 2025. So you are getting excited for this. I guess, one question I have is, as you get closer to launching the registration-enabling study in metastatic breast, I am wondering how you are thinking about the total cost of that trial, and I know you did provide some sort of detail around timing. But if you could provide as much color on launch timing and initial readout timing as you can, that would be terrific.

Sure. I can take that. So currently, we are working at getting the study registration, pardon me, enrollment ready. And so, you know, what that means is we have more or less finalized the protocol. We will be approaching the regulator just as a normal course activity. In the meantime, we are working with identified sites through feasibility and working with their process to get them on board. And then once we have those sites identified and ready to be put on board, we will look to bring them online and then we will be in a position to enroll. We are targeting to be in that position, you know, as things progress, it will probably be later half of the year now. Once enrollment starts, it is expected to be an 18-month enrollment period with a six-month data maturity to get to PFS readout. So in the interim, we are looking at putting in place a futility analysis, and we have to finalize that assessment, but our expectations right now is a futility analysis will take about 14 months from the first patient enrolled to get to that point, and then we can have the futility readout.

Okay. Great. And then any sharper estimations on total costs?

We are working through that, Michael. I think it is premature to speak to that in any great detail. But as we understand our sites and their enrollment rates, etcetera, we will be able to have more color on that.

Gotcha. Okay. Thank you. One more question. I have been noticing more news from oncolytic virus developers in the landscape. And I wonder if you are seeing increasing evidence that there is a bit of an oncolytic virus renaissance going on. And are you seeing increased interest from pharma as a result? Like, I point specifically to CG Oncology, you know, they were able to raise $200 million at the end of last year on good data. You know, and that is a live virus. Curious how you are seeing things. I am curious for your perspective on all this.

Christophe, do you want to speak to that as to what you have heard on your end? And I can follow-up and if others want to jump in, they can.

No. Happy to answer that. Yes. You are exactly right. I mean, you are talking about CG Oncology. We also, I do not know, you may have seen also Kendall, you know, who has done a raise, you know, at the end of last year. We definitely see more activities in that field. I think that is very beneficial for us. Because let us remember that we have significant advantages, you know, being injected, you know, instead of, I mean, IV injection. And not an intratumoral. And, you know, the intratumoral has been sometimes, you know, a little complicated for big pharma companies that do not really interested in that. So we, as I mentioned during the call, think we continue to have a conversation with potential partners, and we have seen that, you know, the fact how we position, you know, PELA in breast cancer, the multiple, you know, signal breast cancer, obviously, having very strong data, but also the strong signal we have seen in other indications. Pancreatic and anal. Resonating very well with potential companies. Kirk, do you want to add anything to that?

Yeah. And what we are noticing on, you know, kind of just discussions and presentations with investors is again more interest in the oncolytic virus space that we are seeing. We are seeing more dedicated, you know, clinicians, science experts from those investors sitting down and talking to us and, you know, walking through our data and our plan. And there have been some comments from their standpoint just seeing some white space opportunities to generate return for them. And so their focus is on that. They see some of them are seeing this as a real opportunity. So that in combination with what is going on in the industry, you know, I think there are some pretty big and important data readouts coming from our competitors that will be important to help those investors continue looking at the space. And, you know, we have seen a real shift in that. So we are excited to hopefully be part of that.

So I am yeah. I get a rising tide situation. I hope if I could shoehorn one last one in, I wonder on the pancreatic front, and your alignment with GCAR, I understand that you are working together to submit to get that master protocol together. First, will this be the first trial launched on the GCAR platform and just I recognize that it takes some time for this organization to unload and get together a master protocol. But I wonder if there is any way that this trial can be accelerated to launch.

Can you speak to us? Yeah. Yeah. I can speak to that, but, you know, we have been working, as Kirk mentioned, very actively with GCAR to finalize a licensure enabling study protocol. The next step would be, as would be typical in this sort of situation, to go to the regulators and get the FDA's thoughts and move on from there. And so it is really maybe a little early for us to say anything very specific about the timing until we talk to the FDA. But I can say with regard to accelerating it, that like, you know, we are working very actively with GCAR, and so we are moving things forward with them at the greatest possible pace.

Okay. Alright. Thank you very much. I look forward to seeing all your activity this year. I will pass it on.

Alright. Thank you. And once again, if you would like to ask a question, simply press the star one on your telephone keypad. Your next question comes from the line of Patrick Trupeau with H.C. Wainwright. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everyone. Thank you for taking our questions. Luis here in for Patrick. Congratulations on the latest presentations. We are curious to know what your thoughts are around the positioning, the commercial positioning of PELA given that ADCs seem to have shown and continue to show positive results in the same patient population. So you are probably going to focus on the patients that did not respond or are not eligible, as you said, for this kind of therapy. Is there any other population that you could target regarding the ADCs and you think that there is a potential also for a combination, not just a sequential treatment approach, but a combination with an HER2 and other ADCs?

Thank you. Okay. Sure. So I, Thomas here. I can start there, and then if Christophe or others want to jump in, they can. But you are right. We do want to target patients who are ineligible for or cannot tolerate ADCs. But in actuality, the largest population we expect to target will be patients who receive ADC therapy and then progress on ADC therapy, which is going to be a very large population. The ADCs have been extremely successful drugs and have benefited a lot of patients. But they are not cures. Right? And so once a patient takes an ADC at the appropriate time in their treatment path, they will eventually progress on that therapy and will at that point need the best possible treatment options. And so we think that we would very well provide an alternative there that would be very attractive. Right? And then I am sorry. What was the second part of your question, please?

We were wondering if there is any potential for combination with any of these therapies.

Yeah. Yeah. Sorry. So pelareorep, in general, has proven itself to be an agent that can potentiate the activity of other therapies, including chemotherapy and immunotherapies. I think it is a very logical thing to consider in the future. It is not our immediate path for a variety of reasons now, but I think at the appropriate time in the future, combination therapy with ADCs and other agents will certainly be something worth considering.

Great. Thank you. And yeah, this is Christophe. I can add a little color, you know, on the more on the numbers of patients for you. As you may recall, we discussed a total addressable patient population of 55,000 patients just in the U.S. And when you look at that, it is mostly, you know, for patients who would have been on Enhertu. And would have initially responded and then, you know, would relapse, which is, you know, as you look at Enhertu, I mean, your average PFS is 10 to 11 months. So we know that this patient at some point in time will need another better treatment. So, you know, when we build our forecast of that that totals more than $2 billion, that considers 55,000, you know, patients annually in the U.S. And then, you know, we take, you know, a very conservative approach with 15 to 20% market share, you know, in this population. So that is where we believe, you know, there is a significant market opportunity.

A follow-up question?

Thank you. That was very helpful. Great. Thank you.

And I am showing no further questions at this time. I would like to turn it back to Kirk Look for closing remarks.

Well, thanks to everybody who took the time to join our earnings call this morning. This is going to be an exciting year for PELA and Oncolytics Biotech Inc. with additional data readouts expected and the planning of registration-enabling studies that can move PELA closer to regulatory approval. Thanks again for your support, we will have more updates as soon as we can. Wishing everyone a wonderful day. Thanks very much.

Thank you, presenters. And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect.