Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by. And welcome to the Ocular Therapeutix First Quarter Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Donald Notman, Chief Financial Officer of Ocular Therapeutix. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Liz. Good afternoon everyone and thank you for joining us on our first quarter 2019 financial results and business update conference call. This morning, we issued a press release providing an update on the company's product development programs and details of the company's financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2019. The press release can be accessed on the Investors portion of our Web site at investors.ocutx.com. Leading the call today will be Antony Mattessich, our President and Chief Executive Officer, who will provide an update on plans for the upcoming commercial launch of DEXTENZA and a summary of our corporate developments and upcoming clinical milestones. Also speaking on the call will be Dr. Michael Goldstein, our Chief Medical Officer, who will provide an update on our clinical developments and pipeline. Following Michael's remarks, I will provide an overview of the financial highlights for the first quarter of 2019 before turning the call back over to Antony for a summary and questions. For Q&A, we will also be joined by Scott Corning, our Senior Vice President, Commercial; and Dr. Dan Bollag, our Chief Strategy Officer and Head of Regulatory Affairs. As a reminder, during today's call, we will be making certain forward-looking statements. Various remarks that we make during this call about the company's future expectations, plans and prospects constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the Safe Harbor provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including those discussed in the Risk Factors section of our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which was filed with the SEC on May 10, 2019. In addition, any forward-looking statements represent our views only as of today and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, except as we are required to do so by law even if our views change. I will now turn the call over to Antony.

Thanks, Donald. This is an incredibly exciting time at Ocular. The launch of DEXTENZA, our dexamethasone intracanalicular insert, for the treatment of post-surgical pain is in full rollout. Commercial product is now at the distributors. Our field force is fully trained and has been calling on accounts since April 29. And most importantly, samples should be reaching the first surgery centers early next week giving surgeons the ability to work DEXTENZA into their surgical protocols. We also had some great news from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services who has listed DEXTENZA with those products that have been preliminarily recommended for a new dedicated Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System, HCPCS, J-code, effective January 1, 2020. In the meantime we expect to be selling under a temporary C-code which we anticipate to be in place in mid-2019. We’re off to a great start. For those who may be new to the Ocular story, DEXTENZA is a bioresorbable intracanalicular insert delivering a 0.4 milligram dose of preservative-free dexamethasone for up to 30 days. The product is the first of a novel dosage form in route of administration that is easily deployable and can deliver drugs to the surface of the eye without the challenges associated with eye drops. DEXTENZA has the potential to become a transformative product for both patients and physicians. For patients, DEXTENZA will offer the convenience of a full course of steroid treatment in a single preservative-free intracanalicular insert. This novel means of delivery can replace a complex eye drop regimen with under the current standard of care can require up to 70 topical ocular steroid drops delivered over a full month. For physicians, DEXTENZA puts control of patient compliance back in their hands. We believe DEXTENZA is simply a better way of delivering the steroid to the…

Thanks, Antony. Before getting to our pipeline, it is important to highlight our continued efforts to expand the potential of DEXTENZA. DEXTENZA truly represents a franchise opportunity for the company with multiple lifecycle expansion opportunities and other indications where a product profile like DEXTENZA has the potential to change the standard of care. Our January supplemental new drug application to expand DEXTENZA’s label to include the treatment of ocular inflammation following ophthalmic surgery was accepted for filing by the FDA with the November PDUFA target action date. Recent data presented at the ASCRS highlighted pooled data from our three Phase 3 trials and demonstrated the benefit DEXTENZA provides in treating both ocular pain and inflammation after cataract surgery. You’ve heard from us before we believe DEXTENZA represents multiple additional pipeline opportunities in other ocular indications. We presented previously reported Phase 3 data at the ASCRS meeting illustrating the benefit DEXTENZA provides in treating the symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis in human trials using a modified version of the conjunctival allergen challenge or CAC model. Later this year, we plan to initiate additional trials that will evaluate DEXTENZA in allergic conjunctivitis as well as a clinical trial as part of our regulatory requirement in pediatric cataract surgery. Additionally, we have received proposals for and plan to support several investigator initiated trials evaluating DEXTENZA in different clinical situations. As we discussed at our recent Investor Day in New York, beyond DEXTENZA, our development efforts include a pipeline of products that target not only other ocular diseases in both the front and back of the eye but also diseases or conditions outside of the eye. Each of the products within our pipeline targets a well-defined market that we believe is underserved by the current standard of care. And like DEXTENZA, each of the products…

Thanks, Michael. Let me begin by summarizing our capitalization. As of the quarter ended March 31, 2019, we had $76.3 million in cash and cash equivalents versus $54.1 million at year-end December 31, 2018. Both of these cash amounts exclude $6.6 million of restricted cash as required by our existing senior debt facility and letters of credit for our property leases. The cash balance benefited during the first quarter from our $37.5 million convertible note offering and $5 million in net proceeds generated from the sale of common stock under the company’s 2016 Sales Agreement. Offsetting the convertible note and the 2016 sales agreement inflows during the quarter were net losses of $17.1 million, working capital changes of $2.8 million and capital equipment investments of $0.7 million. As disclosed in this morning’s 10-Q filing, we exhausted the 2016 Sales Agreement with the first quarter sales of stock and cancelled the facility. On April 5, 2019, the company entered into an Open Market Sale Agreement, or the 2019 Sales Agreement with Jefferies LLC, under which the company may offer and sell its common stock having aggregate proceeds of up to $50 million from time to time. Through May 9, 2019, the company has not sold any shares under the 2019 Sales Agreement. Based on our current plans and forecasted expenses that include the impact of the recent internal spending reprioritization that Antony noted previously, we believe that existing cash and cash equivalents will fund operating expenses, debt service obligations, and capital expenditures into the second quarter of 2020. This is of course subject to a number of assumptions related to the revenues and expenses associated with commercialization of DEXTENZA as well as the pace of our research and clinical development programs and other aspects of our business. Research and development expenses…

Thanks, Donald. Before opening the call up for questions, I’d like to recap the company’s upcoming milestones for 2019. We remain on track to begin recording sales for DEXTENZA in mid-2019 upon receipt of the C-code. With deployment of recommendation by CMS to establish a permanent HCPCS J-code for DEXTENZA, we expect a confirmation of the recommendation in November and a code established to be effective in January 2020. We have received a PDUFA target action date regarding our sNDA to potentially expand DEXTENZA label to include an indication of ocular inflammation following ophthalmic surgery in November 2019. We expect to report results from our first pivotal Phase 3 study for OTX-TP in the next several weeks. We have made progress on both of our Phase 1 programs. For OTX-TIC, we are pleased with the initial data from the Phase 1 trial that were presented at the recent ARVO and ASCRS ophthalmic conferences. For OTX-TKI, we have completed our first cohort, the DSMC met and we will be dosing our second cohort at a higher dose. We continue to leverage the huge potential of our hydrogel platform and look forward to filing a new IND in an undisclosed ocular indication by the end of the year. Finally, we’re ring-fencing an optimal launch for DEXTENZA. We have taken actions to extend our cash runway into the second quarter of 2020 and are actively looking at all avenues to adequately fund the company that prioritize non- or less-dilutive instruments. In summary, we are encouraged with our progress in all aspects of our business and look forward to evolving Ocular into a commercial, biopharmaceutical company with the launch of DEXTENZA. With that, I want to thank you for your time. And we can now open the line for questions.

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Stacey Gru [ph] with Cowen. Your line is now open.

Hi. Congratulations on the progress and thanks for taking my questions. First question is do you anticipate clinicians using DEXTENZA broadly even before the expanded indication for postsurgical ocular inflammation? And I have a follow up.

Sure. Thanks for your congratulations. We’re certainly pleased with our progress to date. In terms of where this could be used, I’ll hand it off to our Head of Commercial, Scott Corning.

Okay. Thank you. We actually do. Steroids are commonly approved for both pain and inflammation and although our initial indication out of the gate will be for treatment of pain following ocular surgery, we anticipate that not to be a big barrier. And people are well aware of not only the presentation of our recent result today at ASCRS but also the publication in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery regarding positive inflammation data that has underpinned the sNDA that was filed with the PDUFA date in November. So we aren’t overly concerned with the lack of inflammation on the label at the outset.

Okay, perfect. And moving on to OTX-TP, can you remind us what you think will be the most important endpoint for the Phase 3 study? What will be the next steps following top line data? And when can we expect the open-label, one-year results? Thank you.

Sure. This is Mike Goldstein. So in terms of the endpoints for OTX-TP, there are nine of them which are very typical for any study looking at a drug designed to lower intraocular pressure. So we’re looking at the IOP at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks after insertion. And for each of those days we’re looking at the time points of 8 am, 10 am and 4 pm. And for the trial to be successful we need to show a statistically significant benefit of using the OTX-TP product versus a placebo insert at those nine time points. In addition for regulatory approval, we need to demonstrate that at those nine time points the difference from baseline was clinically meaningful. In terms of next steps, once we have the data in hand, I would anticipate we would have a discussion with the FDA in preparation for a second Phase 3 trial. And in terms of the open-label trial – so in addition to showing efficacy from a regulatory perspective, we need to show safety with product use. And so we need a minimum of 100 subjects that are treated for a year and 300 subjects treated for six months and that’s what the open label study is partly designed to address.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Dan Leone with Raymond James. Your line is now open.

Thank you. Could you just kind of provide some more color in terms of the cadence enrollment with the TKI program? It sounds like you went up a dose level. Could you just kind of maybe delve into a little deeper what you’ve seen and kind of how your expectations are evolving to get through this study?

Sure. Thanks, Dan, for your question. As you know, tyrosine kinase inhibitors are a potential new way to treat patients with age-related macular degeneration and serious retinal diseases. The current standard of care are anti-VEGF therapy which work really well but haven’t worked – don’t work well for all patients. And so there is the opportunity for drugs with new mechanisms of action and we believe because tyrosine kinase inhibitors are upstream of VEGF that this could be a potentially attractive target. So we currently have a Phase 1 trial that’s ongoing in Australia. We have currently dosed the first cohort of six subjects and we had a DSMC meeting a couple of weeks ago and DSMC looked at the data and we are – there were no safety concerns and we’re now moving to a higher dose. So once we’ve established additional data in terms of efficacy and safety, the plan would then be to move into a larger Phase 2 study likely in the United States sometime next year.

So to date it sounds like there has been no events related to potential disaggregation on the hydrogel or anything like that?

Yes. So by definition, like our other products, the drugs embedded in hydrogel and just as we see with the other products, the hydrogel is designed to [indiscernible] over a specified period of time. So it’s like the solution that you inject and it can disaggregate it. It really can’t disaggregate it. So we’ve seen no issues with migration of the implant or any kind of disaggregation issues.

Excellent. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions]. Our next question comes from the line of Yi Chen with H.C. Wainwright. Your line is now open.

Thank you for taking my questions. My first question is, between TIC and TKI given that both of them are implants, do you expect them to have the same pattern of drug release or they could be different because of your plan to different positions within the eye?

This is Mike, again. Thanks, Yi, for your question. So they are very different products. So the beauty of the platform, the hydrogel platform, is that we can customize the program to drug release based upon the particular disease that we’re looking at and the characteristics of the particular drug. So in the case of TIC, it’s an intracameral insert implant designed to treat glaucoma and there’s a certain release profile that we’ve designed and a certain dissolution of the hydrogel that we’ve designed. In the case of TKI, we’re actually injecting it intravitreally, so a different compartment in the eye for a completely different indication. And again, we uniquely designed each of the products to work for that particular disease.

And are there any data suggesting that tyrosine kinase inhibitor could provide a synergistic efficacy when combined with anti-VEGF agents?

Yes, that’s a great question. So there’s a number of anecdotal reports in the literature that people have discussed. More recently there’s a company called Graybug that has designed a trial where they take patients who are already pretreated with anti-VEGF medications and then have added on their tyrosine kinase inhibitor on top of that and have been able to demonstrate with that combination you have less of a need for rescue therapy with anti-VEGF therapy. All that said, we think there’s also the opportunity to be able to use TKIs as monotherapy and that’s sort of the first thing we’re addressing is can they be used as standalone therapy and that’s what – that’s the answers we’re trying to get out of this trial and then also looking at it in combination.

Okay, got. Last question is, given that the hiring of the sales team has been completed, are the sales – are the SG&A expenses shown in the first quarter represented the core like expenses during the rest of 2019?

Yi, what you see in the current quarter is certainly a ramp up to where we’re going. But as we mentioned before, this is not a – this is a highly centralized core of key opinion leaders. There is a – we’re going after a very specific set of patients in the Medicare Part B area. So the investment in a launch will not be to the level of what you’d see in a primary care type environment. So it does lead up to a ramp but we’re nearly there on what we would expect to be able to spending on this from an investment standpoint for the launch of DEXTENZA. The thing that doesn’t show up is that we have a hub that will become online and that is actually – the payment for that is really on a fee-for-service basis. So as customers start to use the product, they will start to call up that hub and will be charged for the services that are required in order to clear up the billing and coding of the product.

Got it. Thank you.

I’m showing no further questions in queue at this time. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today’s conference. This concludes the program. You may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.