Hello all. And welcome to Owens Corning’s Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. My name is Lydia, and I’ll be your operator today. After the prepared remarks there’ll be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] I’ll now hand you over to Amber Wohlfarth, Vice President of Investor Relations, Corporate Affairs to begin. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thank you for taking the time to join us for today’s conference call and review of our business results for the second quarter 2024. Joining us today are Brian Chambers, Owens Corning’s Chair and Chief Executive Officer; and Todd Fister, our Chief Financial Officer. Following our presentation this morning, we will open this one-hour call to your questions. In order to accommodate as many call participants as possible, please limit yourselves to one question only. Earlier this morning, we issued a news release and filed a 10-Q that detailed our financial results for the second quarter 2024. For the purposes of our discussion today, we have prepared presentation slides summarizing our performance and results, and we’ll refer to these slides during this call. You can access the earnings press release, Form 10-Q and the presentation slides at our website, owenscorning.com. Refer to the Investors link under the Corporate section of our homepage. A transcript and recording of this call and the supporting slides will be available on our website for future reference. Please reference Slide 2, where we offer a couple of reminders. First, today’s remarks will include forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially. We undertake no obligation to update these statements beyond what is required under applicable securities laws. Please refer to the cautionary statements and the risk factors identified in our SEC filings for more detail. Second, the presentation slides and today’s remarks contain non-GAAP financial measures. Explanations and reconciliations of non-GAAP to GAAP measures may be found in our earnings press release and presentation, available on the Investor section of our website, owenscorning.com. For those of you following along with our slide presentation, we’ll begin on Slide 4. And now, opening remarks from our Chair and CEO, Brian Chambers. Brian?

Thank you, Amber. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. During our call today, I’ll begin with an overview of our second quarter performance and provide an update on our two big strategic moves to reshape Owens Corning into a more focused building products company. After that, Todd will go into more detail about our financial results for the second quarter, and then I’ll come back to discuss the market environment and our outlook for the third quarter. Turning to our overall performance in Q2, Owens Corning continued to deliver outstanding financial results within a very dynamic market, demonstrating the broad capability of our team, the value of our product offering, and the earnings power of our company. In addition to delivering another quarter of strong operating performance, we completed the acquisition of Masonite expanding our portfolio of branded residential building products and continued the review of our glass reinforcements business. Both of these strategic moves are key parts of our ongoing transformation to a more focused residential and commercial building products company that leverages key ownership advantages to accelerate our growth and increase our earnings. I’ll share more about our transformational efforts in a few moments. First, I’ll begin with a review of our performance. Our global team made additional progress in our safety performance with a recordable incident rate of 0.46 for our legacy Owens Corning business in the second quarter. Three-fourths of our facilities have operated injury-free in 2024. More than half have done so for over a year. Combined with a positive first quarter, our number of recordable injuries year-to-date is 40% lower than the same time last year. As we add our new Doors business to the company, which is not included in this data, consistent with Owens Corning’s unconditional commitment to safety,…

Thank you, Brian, and good morning, everyone. As Brian mentioned, our outstanding results in the quarter and through the first half of the year demonstrate the value being created through our enterprise strategy and operating model. I’d now like to turn to Slide 6 to discuss the quarter in more detail. As a reminder, our financial results include the impact of the Masonite acquisition, which closed on May 15th. We have established a new Doors reporting segment where you can see the performance of the newly acquired business. In the second quarter, we continue to build up the great results we delivered in the first quarter, growing enterprise earnings and expanding margin again in Q2. Adjusted EBIT of $588 million and adjusted EBITDA of $742 million grew versus last year by 10% and 12%. Adjusted EBIT margin was 21% and adjusted EBITDA margin was 27%. Part of the year-over-year growth can be attributed to the acquisition, with the remainder coming from both commercial execution and manufacturing performance. Organically, adjusted EBIT and adjusted EBITDA were up 4% and 3%, respectively. Adjusted earnings for the second quarter were $408 million or $4.64 per diluted share, compared with $388 million or $4.25 per diluted share in the same quarter prior year. For the quarter, adjusting items totaled approximately $130 million and are excluded from our adjusted EBIT. They primarily include $62 million of Masonite acquisition-related costs and $47 million of restructuring charges primarily related to actions taken in the Doors segment to begin to realize expected synergies. Turning to Slide 7, our capital allocation strategy remains unchanged. We are focused on generating strong free cash flow, returning approximately 50% to investors over time, and maintaining an investment-grade balance sheet while executing on our business strategies to grow the company. Looking at our cash…

Thank you, Todd. Our second quarter results demonstrate the work our teams have done and the actions we have taken to strengthen Owens Corning and generate higher, more resilient earnings. We are a company that continues to outperform prior cycles with opportunities for additional growth. As we move through the third quarter, we expect North American building and construction markets to remain healthy. In the U.S., we see ongoing demand for single-family new construction, given the overall need for housing and the high price and low availability of existing homes for sale. We also expect non-discretionary repair and remodeling activity and the need for our brand in the channel to drive continued strong demand for our Roofing products. We expect more discretionary repair and remodeling activity to remain softer in the near-term, primarily impacting demand for our Doors products. Outside North America, we anticipate macroeconomic trends and geopolitical tensions will continue to result in volume pressure. Overall for the company, we expect third quarter revenue growth of low 20%. We anticipate revenues from our legacy OC business similar to prior year, plus a full quarter of sales for our new Doors segment. For EBIT, we expect to deliver high team margin for the enterprise, with an EBITDA margin of low 20%. Now, consistent with prior calls, I’ll provide a more detailed business-specific outlook for the third quarter. Starting with our Roofing business, we anticipate our revenue to be flat to slightly down. Coming into the year, the industry was servicing carryover storm demand from 2023. As we have worked through most of that demand, in-year storms have come down from the historical high levels we saw in 2023. As a result, absent any major tropical storms, we expect ARMA market shipments to be down mid-to-high single digits for the third…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from Michael Rehaut with JPMorgan. Please go ahead to your line of questions.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for taking my question. I’d love to get an update, maybe a little more detail on the Doors synergies. You said broadly that with Masonite, you said that it remains on track and you highlighted some early areas of progress that you’ve been able to achieve off the bat. I was wondering if perhaps you could give a where we are within that $125 million projected synergy target, where we are today in terms of, let’s say, percent that you’ve been able to start to achieve and how we should think about the progression of achieving those savings over the next several quarters?

Good morning, Mike. Thanks for the question. Let me start by just saying how excited we are to add the Doors business to the overall company. We closed this deal mid-May and our teams did really great work from signing to close in a little over 90 days, and we finished that up mid-May. Since closing, we’ve been very busy welcoming our new colleagues to the company. We’ve been visiting sites. We’ve been meeting with customers and beginning the integration process. So, I think we’re very pleased with how things have come together in terms of the initial start. To your question on the progress on the enterprise $125 million and synergies. I’d say we’re making really good progress. We’re not getting into the specifics of how we’re chunking that out. We had talked earlier on about getting most of these realized by the end of year two in terms of a timeline for completion. I’d say we’re progressing very well on that timeline. The teams have come together. I talked about in my prepared comments some of the initial sourcing synergies where we’ve got some leverage around transportation costs. We’ve got common vendors where we’re able to extend terms and programs and that’s giving us some initial lift in some of the capture of synergies. So, I think that work around the sourcing front is progressing as planned. We continue to look at other opportunities and we feel like we’re going to be on track for that $125 million of enterprise synergies over that two-year time frame. I think one thing I would add as well that is not included in the express synergies, it’s something we’re also just getting started on, is really looking at the commercial and revenue growth opportunities. And we’re early days into this, but we remain very excited when we look at the innovation agenda that we’ve got combining our material science capabilities, our technologies, our study capabilities, our sound and energy capabilities. We really feel like we’ve got a great innovation agenda that we’ve reset with business. And we’re looking now as we look across the customer base. All the customers I’ve met with and the team meets with, we continue to get great feedback on the opportunities in front of us to be a more impactful provider of Roofing, Insulation, Doors now to our builders, to our distributors and work with them to help them grow their business. So, we’re excited about some of the opportunities on the revenue side and growth side. Those are going to be a little bit longer, as we’ve always talked about, but we continue to see more opportunity as we get further along in the integration process.

Our next question comes from John Lovallo with UBS. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Thank you for taking my question as well. $311 million in revenue from Doors in the quarter. What was the actual full run rate for the quarter? It would seem to imply maybe down kind of low to mid-20% range in the third quarter. So, I’m curious, what was the impact from the Architectural divestiture, and how are you thinking about doors volume versus price in the third quarter?

On the $311 million, I guess, I’d ask you to go back to probably the Masonite Q2 results of last year and that’s going to break out the Architectural segment in more detail in terms of revenue and margins. We closed mid-May, so a good assumption is going to be to take about half of that in terms of run rate revenues and margins and that would have the impact of the Architectural divestiture on our $311 million in terms of the run rate that we picked up post-close of the business. So, that’s, I think, a pretty good way to frame the revenue side and the margin impact around the architectural divestiture. As we look going forward into the quarter, I think, we -- the Q2 performance I think and the business performed very well relative to the market in line with our expectations. We saw volume trending down in the first half as we see some more challenging market conditions. This is a category that’s got a little bit more discretionary aspects to particularly the repair and remodeling parts of the business. We saw those volume declines kind of coming through the first half of the year, and in our third quarter guide, we’re expecting that that’s the kind of market conditions we’re going to face into here in the third quarter. So, we’re going to continue to see some volume pressures as consumers are making some more discretionary choices around some of their investments in home repair and remodeling. We also see distributors buying cautiously in terms of managing inventories as we work through this high interest rate environment. But in the near-term, we’ve guided through that in our third quarter call that we expect to hear and see some near-term volume pressures. But again, medium-term, long-term, we think this is a great category to complement our Roofing and Insulation products. We’re bullish on new construction continuing to grow. We expect that interest rates are going to move down, and that’s going to open up repair, remodeling, existing home sales, renovation projects, that doors are an essential part of those projects going forward. So, in the near-term, we’re managing through some choppy market conditions, but in the medium-term, long-term, we feel very good about the product category and the position we’ll have in it.

Our next question comes from Stephen Kim with Evercore ISI. Your line is open.

Thanks very much, guys. Your question, I guess, related to Insulation -- the Insulation segment. I was curious if you could give us a sense for when you look at the European business, I know that Pratt has had some issues and so forth. Was that a meaningful effect on the adjusted numbers that you report, either on the sales or on the margin? And if you could, maybe just looking at North America, you alluded to the capacity expansion. I think you used the word flexible, looking for a solution that’s kind of flexible across both commercial and residential. That sounded like it might be something other than fiberglass. So, maybe we’re talking more like spray foam or something like that. Just curious if you could maybe give us a little more color on what you meant by the flexibility in your capacity expansion in North America?

Thanks, Stephen. Good morning. I’m happy to take both of those. So, let me start with the global and technical piece and the trends that we’re seeing in Europe. Overwhelmingly, what we’re seeing in Europe right now is the impact of weak macros in Europe, and in particular, in the geographies where we have the strongest footprint in the Nordics and then in Central and in Eastern Europe. As we’ve talked about before, Europe really hasn’t rebounded the same way we’ve seen North America rebound. Europe has not sorted through inflation and interest rates the same way we’ve seen North America rebound and be strong. So, I think the good news in Europe is there are some green shoots in Europe overall, more in Southern Europe now, where we are seeing a more positive outlook. It may take a couple quarters for that to make its way to Northern Europe and the Nordics, where we really haven’t seen those green shoots yet from a macro standpoint. I would say, though, our team is executing very well in this European environment. They’ve done a great job around cost control, around productivity, around really positioning our business to win going forward with the right products and the right customers and the right geographies and the right cost structure. So, we continue to like that business long-term as we see the macros strengthen. When we look at flexibility around what we’re thinking with our project for North America, it’s really around how do we flexibly leverage existing space that we have in existing facilities to really serve our big fiberglass markets in North America. A number of our products cross res and commercial, and we can sell products made on shared lines into both of those markets. So, when we look at flexibility, there’s a couple elements. It’s how do we make sure we leverage our existing cost structure in existing facilities as effectively as we can to make sure anything we add is both capital and cost-efficient long-term, but then how do we make sure we’re really well-positioned to serve both the attractive commercial side of that business, as well as the residential side of the business as we go forward.

Our next question comes from Kathryn Thompson with Thompson Research Group. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi. Thank you for taking my question today. Masonite was a leader in the pricing for pricing for the door industry overall, very transformational. And as you transition Masonite into Owens Corning, how are you balancing that price and volume from a strategic focus going forward, and what steps are being made to retain market share and key channels for the Masonite product? And finally, just tying into that, are there any type of crossover synergies with your composite business with Masonite? Thank you.

Yeah. Thanks, Kathryn. So, they have been a leader in terms of price and value. I think it’s a very complementary product line to how we approach our value and value pricing in our product categories as well. So I think it’s a very similar approach in how we look at creating value for our customers through innovation, service, through quality, through marketing tools that help support them and help them win and grow. So, we always start with a fundamental belief that in order to gain price and capture price and hold price, we have to create more value for our customers and that is done through that innovation, commercial strength, pull-through demand trends in ways that we’re helping our customers win and grow in the market, and pricing is then part of that equation going forward. So I think we feel very well positioned to continue to do work across the Doors category, as well as across the company around bringing value to our customers through those kind of innovation and commercial tools. So I think we’re in a good spot there. We always balance price costs. We always balance competitive pricing in the markets relative to share where we look to gain price premiums for the additional value we’re bringing to a customer. We also always look against the competitive landscape and making sure we’re maintaining a range of that price value that is consistent with holding and maintaining our market share position. So, again, that philosophy I think holds true with the Doors category. That’s how we’re going to manage that business going forward, very consistent with how we’ve been managing our Roofing business and our Insulation business with respect to those items. In terms of the synergies around Composites, we do see opportunities. As I said, one of the attractions that may stand to us was our longstanding partnership to supply fiberglass in the development and then production of fiberglass exterior doors. We continue to see opportunities around our material science capabilities when we look at particularly the fiberglass exterior door category to bring innovation and to look at production processes that are very efficient and cost effective. So that is something that we’re leveraging as we go forward on the integration and we see that as opportunities as we grow more in the exterior fiberglass doors part of the business.

Our next question comes from Matthew Bouley with Barclays. Your line is open.

Good morning. You have Elizabeth calling it on for Matt today. I just wanted to touch on Insulation pricing. Are you seeing any traction with the Insulation -- June Insulation price increase so far and could you speak to what degree there could be risks that this price increase doesn’t flow through without a more favorable interest rate environment?

Thanks, Elizabeth. So let me give a little bit of context on what we’re seeing with res this year. So, our res pricing this year has had a bit of an unusual shape where we had a Q4 increase from last year that got pushed into Q1 and then we have another increase in the market, a June increase in the market. Right now we’re seeing solid realization on both of those increases, the first and then also the June increase. I would describe it as in line with historic realization we’ve seen on price increases, maybe a bit higher than history but generally in line. As we’ve shared before, typically in markets where we see utilization in the 90% range, we’ve seen an ability for price increases to stick in the market. We continue to believe the industry, the fiberglass industry has capacity to serve in that $1.4 million to $1.5 million starts range. Right now it might even be at the low end of that range because the strength in single-family homes has been so good and single-family homes have more pounds of Insulation per start than we would see for multifamily units. So we see utilization is healthy now for our res business and we’re seeing pricing in line with history.

Our next question comes from Sam Reid with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Awesome. Thanks. I wanted to touch on Roofing for a second. You called out distributor inventory resets on the component side of the business here. Any sense as to where those distributor inventories sit now? And then it does sound like based on your commentary that that deep dock pressure might continue into the third quarter. I think that’s contemplated in your guidance. I know you only got one quarter out but is there any risk we see a continuation of that dynamic into the fourth quarter? Thanks.

Thanks, Sam. Our Roofing business just delivered another outstanding quarter as you saw in the results and our team continues to execute well. There still continues to be really strong demand for our products overall which is where our shingles outperformed the quarter in terms of relative to armor shipments and we’ve guided to that to continue here into Q3. So I think that’s a phenomenon we expect to continue as we go into the back half year around our shingles. In components, I’d say what we’re seeing now is our components product lines are not on extended service cycles unlike where our shingles still are. And I think what we’ve seen now in Q2 and we expect to see in Q3 is as we’re now we’re starting to see some regional variations in market demand as some of the storm demand is being worked through and we’re tracking to more normalized storm year. We’re still seeing good fundamental repair remodeling outside of storm demand. We’re still seeing some good demand around new construction. I think what we saw on the component side especially is distributors now starting to look at products and locations and starting to reset inventories for the expected third quarter, fourth quarter volumes. So on an absolute basis, I’d say that the volumes for components are still very strong but when you compare them to last year’s Q2, Q3 which were very high and if you recall last year we were seeing strong storm demand inventory levels being increased by distribution in Q2 to service storms. We saw that continue in Q3. So part of the step down we saw in Q2 and Q3 components is relative to very strong demand last year. But on an absolute basis even though we’re seeing them step down on a year-over-year basis they’re still performing and we’re still shipping at a very strong level relative to our strong shipping shingle shipment. So I think we expect that to continue but overall the shingle market is still very healthy. We’re starting to see some pockets and regions that are slowing down. Parts of the Southeast, parts of Florida as some of that storm demand winds down, but overall we expect Q3 and Q4 back after the year to be another good Roofing year.

The next question comes from Mike Dahl with RBC. Please go ahead.

Hi. This is Chris on for Mike. Thanks for taking my question. Just following up on Roofing, can you help size what your 3Q guide is assuming in terms of net price cost in relation to what you saw in 2Q and then given the expectations of continued inflation and successive pricing to date, is there opportunity for additional pricing actions in the segment this year?

Yeah. I think through our guide on Q3 I talked about in Q2 we started to see some inflation in the business around asphalt, around minerals, around labor. The asphalt inflation is very typical to seasonality. Generally, in the summer months with higher paving demand we see asphalt costs move up. We talked about that in terms of a Q3 guide then we thought those inflationary trends were going to continue into Q3. But overall we still expect with the April increase and price realization to maintain a positive price cost mix in Q3 relative to your question. So, we have the August increase that is in market. That’s something that’s just being implemented as we speak. So relative to history I would say when we’ve got good demand for our products we continue to see good demand or good price realization and given the demand environment we see in Q3 we’d expect to see some good realization from that, but that’s early days in terms of just being out and into the market.

Our next question comes from Susan Maklari with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning everyone. In Roofing I wanted to talk a bit about the mix that you’re seeing as you think about the different components around some of that destocking that’s happening, some of the moves broadly speaking in laminates versus asphalt shingles. Any thoughts on how that will come through in the back half and then how you’re thinking about the impacts that that is having on the margin side as well as the revenue?

Yeah. Thanks, Sue. Clearly, the mix has been a positive driver in terms of improving our margins overall and part of the performance of the business over the last couple of quarters and I’d say we’ve seen a pretty consistent theme in terms of mix being -- positive mix being driven by more laminate shingles versus strip shingles. We saw that continue to play out in Q2 and then just the mix of components particularly with the exit of our packaging basis that was a bit lower revenue and lower margin product line. So that combination of more laminate shingles versus strip and the components mix has been a positive impact in Q2. We’re guiding to another positive impact in Q3. I would say that the mix shift from strips to lambs, we think that’s going to continue to give us some benefits here in the back half of the year and we continue to expect the components to continue maybe at a more moderate rate but continue as we go forward again against the comp on the packaging piece. So I’d say that’s been a key part of the step up in margins overall. Now in terms of our overall margin performance, while we’ve seen the benefits of the mix shift, I think laminate shingles are going to continue to run at a very high level mix. So that generally comes with some higher margins and we expect that it’s going to continue. The component side of the business, we continue to see contractors selling in the home more complete systems. So that includes hip and ridge, starter, underlayments, all of those high margin components and so we continue to see attachment rates to our shingles increase and improve. So from a margin durability standpoint, we think these mix shifts are permanent in terms of moving into higher margin product categories and the mix shift with more components to shingles as part of system sales, we think that continues going forward. So, we think it maintains, it gives us a good maintaining base of margin performance and a little bit of upside here in Q3.

Our next question comes from Garik Shmois with Loop Capital. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Oh! Great. Thanks. Just following up on Roofing, just to be clear, are you seeing destocking in shingles or is it just components? And then maybe just stepping back a little bit, I know you recently upped your long-term margin outlook in this segment, but you’re running well ahead of that right now. So, wondering what would have to happen for Roofing EBIT margin to get towards the mid-20% long-term view versus holding at this high 20%s to low 30%s level that you’ve demonstrated in the last several quarters?

Yeah. Relative to destocking in shingles, let’s say, the destocking comment was more specific to our components, not our shingles. I would say broadly, we continue to see pretty light inventory levels of our products and our brands in distribution. So we think that’s going to continue to drive good sales here in the quarter. I would say though, across the country where you see some of the ARMA shipments stepping down, I do think that distributors are going to be more selective in the products and brands that they’re buying in Q3. And I think they’re going to manage inventories to whatever market outcome they’re expecting. So there’s not a destocking of our products, but I do think that distributors are going to be probably more cautious in managing inventories overall as we move into the third quarter and complete the year in Roofing. In terms of a margin outlook, yeah, we’ve delivered another quarter above 30%. We’ve guided to a third quarter to run at these similar margins. As I’ve talked about in the past, I think it’d have to be a couple of factors that would start to walk down those margins over time. One is I think we’d have to see a step down in volumes, and that would result in some volume deleverage in terms of both shingles and components that could impact margin rates as we go forward. And then I think we’d have to see a mix -- negative price cost mix start to evolve relative to either higher inflation or pricing moves that would change that overall price cost mix to a more negative stance over time. So I think that would be the combination, Garik, that would kind of lead to margins stepping down over time. I will remind everybody, though, that there is a normal seasonality to the Roofing business, and I do expect that we’re going to start coming into a more normal seasonality where we see some lower margins in Q4 and Q1 as we take maintenance and downtimes, stronger margins in Q2, Q3. The market overall has been very strong in the last couple of years. We haven’t seen that typical seasonality. But I would say when we talk about our longer term guide, we’re talking over kind of a four-quarter average over a full-year average. But quarter-to-quarter, we may see some quarters that step down below that just with normal seasonality.

Our next question comes from Philip Ng with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Can you provide a little more color on the strategic review on your Composite glass reinforcement business, any color on level of interest in the multiples you’re discussing? And then from a demand standpoint, it certainly looks a little stronger, particularly North America glass reinforcement. Any color in which end markets are standing out? Any restocking? And does that set you up for potentially some pricing momentum next year? Thank you.

Thanks, Phil. I’ll take that one. In terms of the review, I’ll say first, I mean, we’re really happy with how the entire Composites business is executing right now, and especially the glass reinforcements piece in what continues to be a soft macro environment. When you look at the relatively stable volume and price dynamics we saw in Q2 sequentially from Q1, we are seeing signs of sequential stabilization in the business. As you said, we’re continuing our review of alternatives for the business. We’re pleased with the progress we’ve made to-date in that and we’ll provide further updates as appropriate as we get further into the review. In terms of the outlook for the business, you heard Brian’s comments around what we expect to see in the quarter. Certainly North America is a good market for us and we’ve seen good demand there relative to some of the regions where we are seeing weakness in Asia, in Europe, in both our Insulation and Composites business. We would expect North America to continue to be a source of strength in the business as we go forward. And again, we’ll update everyone as we make further progress on the review.

And our next question is from Gregory Andreopoulos with Citi. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning. Just during the prepared remarks, you spoke about kind of this strength in non-discretionary repair in Roofing kind of offsetting more discretionary demand in the Doors business. So I’m wondering if you could kind of zoom into doors. How do you think about the exposure of the Masonite portfolio to discretionary versus non-discretionary projects? And are there any kind of mixed shifts underway that would suggest a shift towards the higher end or lower end of the mix, so entry level doors versus premium doors? And thank you for taking the question.

Yeah. I think overall in terms of the discretionary, non-discretionary pieces on Doors, I think we see that as more on that side of the portfolio in terms of particularly the R&R side of the business where people are looking to choose or upgrade or replace an exterior door if they’re making repairs on the inside. So we’re seeing those trends kind of flow through in the order book. And we think those recover, but in the near-term, given where consumer spending is trending and some of the cautiousness on investments, we see that impacting that R&R part of the business. I think across the price lines of product categories. I think we’ve not seen major trends in that space coming through. I think price consciousness in terms of the material choice and door choice is always going to be a factor in it, but I couldn’t call out any specific trends we’re seeing today in terms of any trade downs across the product line. I think we’re just seeing general themes of a cautiousness in terms of deferring purchases, pushing off projects and we think that that’s going to come back, but certainly that’s creating some near-term headwinds.

Thank you. We have no further questions in the queue, so I’d like to turn the call back over to Brian Chambers for any closing remarks.

Well, thanks, Lydia. I’d like to close by thanking everyone for making time to join us on today’s call and for your ongoing interest in Owens Corning. We certainly look forward to speaking with you again on our third quarter call and I hope you have a great rest of the day. Thanks.

This concludes today’s call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.