Hello. My name is David, and I’ll be your conference call facilitator this afternoon. At this time, I’d like to welcome everyone to Envista Holdings Corporation’s Fourth Quarter 2024 Earnings Results Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I’ll now turn the call over to Mr. Jim Gustafson, Vice President of Investor Relations at Envista Holdings. Mr. Gustafson, you may begin your conference call.

Good afternoon. Thanks for joining Envista’s fourth quarter 2024 earnings call. We thank you for your interest in our company. With me today are Paul Keel, our President and Chief Executive Officer; and Eric Hammes, our Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I want to point out that our earnings release, the slide presentation supplementing today’s call and the reconciliation and other information required by SEC Regulation G relating to any non-GAAP financial measures providing during the call are all available on the Investors section of our website www.envistaco.com. The audio portion of this call will be archived on the Investors section of our website later today under the heading Events and Presentations. During the presentation, we will describe some of the more significant factors that impacted year-over-year performance. The supplemental materials describe additional factors that impacted the year-over-year performance. Unless otherwise noted, references in these remarks to company-specific financial metrics relate to the fourth quarter of 2024 and references to period-to-period increases and decreases in financial metrics are year-over-year. During the call, we may describe certain products and devices that have applications submitted and pending certain regulatory approvals or are available only in certain markets. We will also make forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including statements regarding events or developments that we believe, anticipate or may occur in the future. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those set forth in our SEC filings, and actual results may differ materially from any forward-looking statements that we may make today. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date that are made, and we do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required by law. With that, I will turn the call over to Paul.

Thank you, Jim. Good afternoon, and welcome, everyone. We appreciate you taking the time to join us today. We’ll cover five items on today’s call. I’ll kick us off with some opening thoughts on our fourth quarter results, the steps we took in 2024 to improve performance and a summary of our guidance for 2025. Next, I’ll turn it over to Eric to take us through the numbers in more detail. I’ll wrap things up with some closing remarks and then we’ll open it up for your questions. Slide 4 summarizes three things, Q4 results, 2024 performance and our 2025 outlook. I’ll touch on each in turn. Results for Q4 were again in line with our expectations. We delivered core growth of 2% and an adjusted EBITDA margin around 14%. We saw continued improvement in our implants business, including North America, which has been a particular focus for us. We had another quarter of share gains and gross margin improvement in Spark and further operational improvements in areas like working capital and customer service supported by EBS. As has now been the case for the past several quarters, the global dental market was soft but stable. We are seeing some headwinds in specific geographic markets and macro volatility remains high. In terms of full year performance, 2024 was a year of transition for us. We refreshed our leadership team, took numerous actions to support improved performance and delivered against the 2024 guidance we reinstated on our Q2 call. Specific to that, core growth in adjusted EBITDA came in at negative 1.5% and 11.8% for 2024, both within their respective ranges. And we generated just over $300 million of free cash flow, a 35% increase over the prior year. With underlying growth in margin around 1% and 14% across 2024, no…

Thanks, Paul. In the fourth quarter, we delivered sales of $653 million. Currency exchange rates impacted sales negatively year-over-year by 90 basis points. Adjusting for the impact of currency, core sales in the quarter increased 2%. Our Specialty Products & Technologies segment declined slightly, and Equipment & Consumables segment increased 6.4% year-on-year. As Paul noted, we delivered positive growth across both of our implant portfolios and Spark delivered another strong quarter of growth, excluding the net impact from our deferral change. In addition, our consumables business posted strong growth in the quarter, although this was off of a low comparable in Q4 2023 when our sell-in was impacted by the cyber attack on our channel partner. We also saw a significant slowdown in China, both in our Diagnostics business, where the competitive dynamics are challenging and in our orthodontics business for the reasons Paul just mentioned. Our fourth quarter adjusted gross margin was 57.2%, an increase of nearly 500 basis points versus the prior year, helped by a transactional foreign exchange benefit. Our adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter was 13.9% which was 170 basis points lower than the prior year. Adjusted EPS in the fourth quarter was $0.24, down $0.05 compared to the same quarter of last year. Finally, we delivered $124 million in free cash flow in Q4 and a total of $303 million in free cash flow for the full year, up 35% versus 2023. We provided two bridges to help break down our year-over-year results. Let’s first turn to the sales bridge. For year-over-year revenue, exchange rates were a headwind of approximately $6 million due to the dollar strengthening. The Spark revenue deferral change accounted for about $7 million in the quarter. This is consistent with the guidance we provided in the Q3 earnings call. On…

Thanks, Eric. I’ll wrap up with a few closing thoughts before we open it up for your questions. First, while the secular attractiveness of dental remains the same, we do not yet see strong evidence of an uptick in demand to the mid-single digit range that is more typical of this market over time. Put another way, market growth is currently slow but stable. Second, our Q4 and full year results came in as guided, core growth in margins fell within expected ranges, and we returned to growth in the fourth quarter as promised. Third, we initiated 2025 guidance consistent with our 2024 trajectory and stable market conditions, 1% to 3% growth and around 14% EBITDA margin. Fourth, the economic engine of Envista is strong, generating more cash in 2024 than we consumed. This coupled with the repatriation work that Eric described earlier, support the share repurchase program that we announced this afternoon. And fifth, and maybe most importantly, we’re thoughtfully and systematically putting in place the necessary building blocks for continued improvement moving forward. I’ll close by thanking my 12,000 capable and committed colleagues around the world. I’m grateful and encouraged by the progress we’re making together. And in the same way, we appreciate the strong support we enjoy from our customers, our partners and our shareholders. And with that, we’ll open it up for your questions.

[Operator Instructions] We’ll take our first question from Elizabeth Anderson with Evercore ISI. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi guys, congrats on the quarter, and thanks for all the details around the guide for 2025. Your 2025 guide came in line with what you’ve been indicating as sort of the run rate in sort of what we’ve been expecting. Can you talk us a little bit more – tell us a little bit more about where you could sort of outperform versus sort of that initial expectation and sort of any risks to that guidance as we think about the year.

Thanks for the question, Elizabeth. Sure. Let me quickly recap the framework for the guidance. And then I’ll cover the upside on the growth side, and maybe I’ll ask Eric to do the same thing for margins. So the framing for the guide is pretty straightforward. It centers on the same three things that we discussed in our prepared remarks. First, when you normalize out for the various puts and takes in 2024, we saw fairly consistent underlying growth in margins across the year. That’s a 1% top line and 14% EBITDA that we’ve talked about. Second, importantly, the dental market conditions for 2025 are expected to be broadly similar to 2024. And then thirdly, as a recent events have reminded us, there is a fair bit of macro uncertainty at the moment. So you put all three of those together, and that consider the 1% to 3% growth and 14% margin guide. Now in terms of potential upside to that, I would note three in particular. You’d have to start with Spark, consistently taking share and expanding gross margins. Add to that, that the vast majority of ortho cases are treated by orthodontists where we have a particularly strong position. So we feel like we have good momentum on the Spark side. Implants is another potential upside, having turned positive in Q4. We recognize that one point is far from a trend, but the positive growth and the continued progress across the year have been the expected outcome of the work that we’re doing and the investments that we’re making. So we like our progress there. And then third, I think I’d point to Diagnostics. It’s another area where we have a strong leadership position, particularly in North America. Now that sector, of course, has been under pressure for a while now, but the market will come back. Every new clinic needs diagnostic equipment, every dental procedure begins with a 2D, 3D and/or intraoral scan. So if that market returns quicker then as currently expected, that, of course, would be constructive for Envista as well. Eric, maybe I’ll turn it over to you for thoughts on the margin side.

Yes. Excellent. Thanks, Paul. Elizabeth, thanks for the forward leaning question. Appreciate it. So I would say three things in terms of opportunity for profit and margin. First, I would just – on the back of Paul’s comment on growth, anything we can do, of course, relative to core growth, volume, price connected with the upside that Paul talked about, Spark, Implants, Diagnostics. Everybody on the call here is aware we’ve got strong gross margins across our portfolio. And every point of growth is helpful for us to grow profits and to a degree margin rate. So growth would be one possible upside. Second opportunity, I would say, would be over delivery on Spark profitability. I think we’ve shown in the past multiple quarters that we’ve made good progress here. We’ve talked about many quarters of cost down sequentially. We’ve talked about multiple quarters of gross margin improvement largely driven by that cost. And I think the foundation that we have of a really great manufacturing technology platform of automation, kind of against the backdrop of our global network for manufacturing is an opportunity. We will be stepping up our investments there capitally in 2025. We, of course, have our commitment out there for Spark profitability in 2025. But if we can go further faster, that’s upside for us. And then I think the third area I would point out would be G&A costs. We talked on the prepared remarks around an announcement structuring, it’s mostly focused on G&A. It’s embedded in our guidance. But we think that there’s more that we can do there. On the risk side, maybe again just extending Paul’s comment on the macro tariffs, FX, interest rates, these are all examples of risks to our outlook. We saw as many did the strong dollar strengthening in Q4, that’s consistent with our guide. It took about 2 points off in terms of FX or growth. It also hits us with about 50 basis points of a headwind on margin rate. It’s in our guide again. But recent announcements and sort of what we’re seeing in the political landscape just gives us a bit of pause and maybe there’s some risk there. So I’ll pause there. Elizabeth, again, thanks for the question getting us kicked off and through the forward lean.

Yes. That’s super helpful. Thanks so much. I was wondering if we could maybe drill down also on the implant business, it was obviously really nice to see that return to low single digit growth this year. How do you sort of think about your expectations for that business? And can you give us a little bit more detail about sort of the incremental investments, whether that was sort of in the product development and what areas or on the go to market strategy.

So sure. Like Spark, we like the momentum that we’re seeing on the implant side. We talked about the positive growth for both the Challenger business as well as premium in Q4 and then the four successive quarters of growth for Challenger. I guess, that’s helpful in a couple regards. So first, you like to see the positive growth, but second, it gives us confidence that the changes we’re making and the investments that we’re putting in are bearing fruit. So of course, these things are more than just putting money into the business. We had a leadership change in Nobel that trickled down to a change in the way our go-to-market approach some of our commercial activities in North America. We’re doing more on the clinical side. We’re stepping up our game on the innovation side. All of those things helped in the quarter but they also build momentum heading here into 2025.

Very helpful. Thank you.

We’ll take our next question from Jon Block with Stifel. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Thanks guys and good afternoon. Sort of wondering where I want to go with the questions. Maybe the first one, Eric, I thought I heard you correct me the 50% decline in China wires and brackets as the industry participants sort of drew down for VBP. Where are you with the size of that China wires and brackets business? And maybe I’ll try to be somewhat brave. I don’t know pre-VBP hit was this around $50 million to $60 million and anything more on the cadence to 2025 when they’re done drawing down. And I’m guessing you think you’re a beneficiary of that from a [indiscernible] perspective into 2026. So a lot there, but I’ll pause.

Yes, sounds good Jon. Yes, so you heard it right. Q4 I mentioned in the prepared remarks about 50% reduction year-over-year in brackets and wires. I won’t talk kind of in depth about the size of our China business, but the way to think about our view of 2025 is that as the market prepares, so as call it, procedures or customers slow their purchases. We saw a version of that in Q4. We think we’ll continue to see a version of that in Q1 and Q2 in addition to the fact that the channel is sitting with sort of a normal level of inventory but that has to get repriced for a preparatory VBP somewhere midyear. That’s perspective. So the way we think net-net about brackets and wires next year is it’ll be down in the first half. We hope it’ll be up in the second half as VBP comes around. And we’re modeling it based on how we saw our implant business in China over the last two years basically move through VBP, lots of variables that can play out there, but that’s how we’re thinking about it next year.

Okay, very helpful. And maybe I’ll pivot for the other question, Paul, your implant portfolio certainly seemed to close the gap to market growth quicker than certainly we were thinking congrats there. I think maybe just to take a step back, what’s embedded in the 2025 guidance? I don’t think you touched upon this from two perspectives. One, market growth for implants, which I think the slides show have been around low single digits. But what’s embedded for Envista’s growth relative to market? I mean, you’ve already gotten there. So was it more of the same or just trying to figure out what’s the assumption within the top line guide? Thanks.

Yes. I mean, I’d be lying if I said that our guide gets down to specific market shares in specific categories and what we think is going to happen with that market. But generally speaking, Jon, we think we’ll continue to gain momentum in our implant business for all the reasons that I addressed in Elizabeth’s call. We’re not expecting a dramatic change in the implants market in 2025 relative to 2024. If the market does turn more quickly, of course, that’ll be constructive for us, and that would be an upside to the guide. But broadly speaking, while the leading indicators for the market, all the green shoots that you’re well familiar with, consumer confidence, interest rates, employment levels, all of that, while they’re favorable, we just not – we’re just not seeing a tangible uptick in patient flows or in our own order book. So same conditions, market conditions 2025 to 2024 in the guide. If that happens quicker, that would be an upside.

Fair enough. Thank you.

We’ll take our next question from Michael Cherny with Leerink Partners. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi, good afternoon or good evening, I guess. Thank you for taking the question. This is Ahmed Muhammad on for Mike Cherny. First, I want to ask about Spark profitability and how it will impact total operating margin when it does become profitable in 2H, I think you mentioned. So, like, what’s the contribution on that kind of immediately and then also like in the long-term?

Yes. I mean, I think, Michael, thanks for the question. I think we’ve disclosed previously Spark’s about a $250 million business for us. So it’s about 10% of sales. So the math is easy there, every point of margin improvement gives you 10 basis points of benefit at the Envista level. So rule of thumb, that’s probably a good way to think about it.

Got it. And does the guidance assume diagnostics getting better for Envista? I know you said that the market is soft, but like, what point does do numbers sort of bottom out? Is it driven by visits being depressed? Is it driven by a need for more innovation? Any color over there would be helpful. Thank you.

Sorry, Michael, you’re asking what’s causing the market softness or what was another question?

I said – sorry, what does a guide assume for diagnostics? What point do numbers kind of bottom out? And is it – is the weakness due to – for Envista, is the weakness due more to – more because of visits or is it a need for more innovation?

Yes, I can take that. So, I mean, just as a reminder, our diagnostics business in 2024 was down mid to high single digits. Fourth quarter, we talked about it being down high single digits. We expect the diagnostics business clearly to be better, say flat to low single digit type of growth. And that’s multiple factors. So we don’t expect significant market recovery from the fourth quarter. But the markets improved a little bit as we’ve gone through the year. And then many of the participants on the call know that we also had some favorable comps, if you will, in 2024. So we exited a few geographies that was to help the profitability of the business, some of those things will help us to deliver a modestly better growth rate next year. And then as Paul opened in his remarks to Elizabeth’s question, this is a market we would hope, gets a little bit better in 2025. But again, we’re assuming that it trends flat versus effectively how we exited the year.

Okay, got it. Thank you so much.

We’ll take our next question from Jeff Johnson with Baird. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hey, Jeff, you might be on mute.

Yes, guys, sorry, I was on mute. Sorry about that. So I guess just a couple clarifying questions here. Eric, if I could, on Spark, I’m just trying to understand the message here. Just on kind of clear aligner market and kind of Spark’s performance relative to the market, which I think was above market, obviously. But you talked about in the press release that Spark revenue down double digits with the deferred revenue. In your slide deck, Spark is up double digits ex the deferred headwind. In your email you sent out, it sounds like cases for Spark were up mid single digits. Do I just connect those dots that pricing was up or ASPs were up 5 to 7 points or something in the quarter? Just one, can you confirm that ballpark accuracy? And two, if cases are growing mid-single digits, how do you think that’s performing relative to the clear aligner broader market? Thank you.

Yes. Jeff, thanks. Let me just lay out, there are a lot of numbers in your question. Let me just lay out the facts and then I’ll turn it over to Eric to add color. So on Spark, revenues for deferral neutral, ex-neutral, I think you said, grew double digits in Q4 and in 2024. That was correct. The number of ordering doctors also grew double digits in Q4 and 2024. And that’s now many successive quarters now, both of margin gain and we think above market growth or market share gains. So hopefully, that clarifies it. Eric, is there anything more you wanted to add to that?

No, I think you got it, Paul. Jeff, maybe just another leg to that. So as we go into then 2025, we gave this detail on the sort of the guidance assumptions or the guidance considerations. Two-thirds of the 2024 Spark deferral headwind, that’s about $45 million, turns accretive next year. We’ve been given the same number for last couple of months. So no big change there with a little bit of color just around the first half, second half. First half will be a little bit of a headwind. Second half will be a tailwind, and that gets us effectively to the same numbers you mentioned in the beginning.

Yes. Got it. That all connects. Okay. That’s helpful. And then just I guess one other bigger picture question in the diagnostic side. Hearing a little chatter out there that you might have a new IOS you’re coming out with this year internally developed through the DEXIS brand. One, anything you can talk about there. It seems like the Carestream product that you acquired hasn’t really picked up much share in the last year and a half that you’ve owned that asset or so. Just any thoughts there on whether or not this might help you better participate in that IOS market? Thanks.

Yes. So let’s see a couple questions in there specific to diagnostics. First, you picked up on there have been a lot of new product introductions on the diagnostic side. There was some additional functionality to the current version of the IOS we launched last year. There was also new sensor – 2D sensors and we introduced a new 3D CBCT platform. So a lot of innovation work on the diagnostic side. And yes, the chatter you’re picking up is correct. The IOS market, a lot of innovation in the category and you got to keep up. So we will be introducing additional functionality, additional version of that IOS moving forward. So per usual, your G2 is right, Jeff.

Yes. Anything you can say on that, Paul, as far as how it might differ from the current Carestream or is that something you don’t want to talk about yet?

Well, there’ll be a couple dental shows coming up. We got Chicago coming up, so we got IDS. So we’ll be saying more soon.

Understood. Thanks.

We’ll take our next question from Kevin Caliendo with UBS. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Thanks. And thanks for taking my question. I appreciate it. Paul, you’ve been in the job for nine months and yes, I think it’s been I don’t want to say shocking, but I think investors have to be happy with the fact that guidance has been very consistent with your commentary and there haven’t been a lot of surprises. And now we’re a month or so away from an Analyst Day, which I suspect is going to be you providing some kind of long-term guidance. One, I wanted to kind of confirm that. And two, what should we be expecting at this Analyst Day in terms of not specifics, but like what – how comfortable are you making long-term projections about the market? And have there been any surprises or anything that either you feel better about or worse about when you think about putting together sort of long-term plans for the company?

Thanks for the question, Kevin. Let’s see, you had two parts in there. First, any surprises in the first nine months? And then second, what should you expect for the Capital Markets Day here, one month from today in fact. So you’re right. The first nine months, no major surprises. Both Eric and I have been in and around dental for decades and we came back to it because of three principal beliefs. First is that it is a secularly attractive market. All of the long-term growth drivers we’re aware of pretty much all levels of the value chain have favorable economics. And that aside from COVID and maybe one year after or post the global financial crisis, this market always grows. So good market was point number one. Point number two is it’s a great portfolio of businesses. Every one of the pieces of Envista has a good market position and all of them can be made better, which is the third reason we jump to the opportunity. You look at the continuous improvement mindset that’s embedded at Envista and the culture where people here really want to get better each and every day. You can just see how you could turn that potential into improved our performance moving forward. So with that as a backdrop, that brings us to next month’s CMD. We had the good fortune to speak to a lot of folks who are on this call and you guys told us you were interested in four things. So we just put together an agenda that responds directly to that. First is embedded in your question. People want to know what’s our thought on long-term value creation here and how do you kind of operationalize that? So I’ll start with that. Secondly, investors told us they’d like a deeper dive into our two biggest businesses, implants and ortho. So you’ll hear from Stefan and from Veronica on that front. And then third, also embedded in your question, we owe the market reinstated medium-term targets. So Eric will finish up the agenda on March 5th with the financial wrapper to the plan, including medium-term guidance. The fourth item of course is you guys would like some exposure to the broader management team. So we’ll have the full group there, both folks who are newer to Envista, but also some of our longer standing colleagues. So that’s our plan. New York Stock Exchange 9:00 till noon on March 5th, we sent out a press release today and we hope all you guys can make it.

Thank you very much. Appreciate that. Look forward to seeing you there.

Yes, it should be fun.

We’ll take our next question from Erin Wright with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks. So on the equipment and consumable side, there were some moving pieces I think in the quarter in terms of sell-in versus sellout trends. I think some of that’s just from a comp perspective. But what are you seeing right now kind of year to date and how do we think about sort of that quarterly progression across that sort of segment for the balance of the year?

Yes, yes, perfect. So I’ll hit your point on the growth piece and then I’ll just talk about margins a little bit if that’s embedded in the question. So I think we’ve been pretty transparent as we’ve gone through the last many quarters. So the first point maybe to make here is in the consumables business relative to distribution comma relative to the channel, nothing really dramatically changed there as we moved through the quarter. So from second quarter to third quarter to fourth quarter, we’ve had very consistent inventory levels, I would say relatively lean inventory levels. And we see that as positive because our overall delivery performance, service performance is strong even with lean working capital management with our distributed partners. So that’s point number one. Most of the revenue move we’re talking about then and we show that in our revenue bridge that is primarily due to last year’s cyber-attack on the distribution channel. It’s about $20 million. It drove a good portion of the consumables and the E&C business. Underlying, we had sellout within dental consumables roughly in line with where it’s been the last several quarters. Flat to low single digits, which we see as being in line with the market. So that’s kind of point number two. And then on the margins, the margins we were up about 570 basis points year-over-year. We were also up sequentially. A lot of that comes from the volume that I just mentioned on a year-over-year basis. We also had a pretty significant transaction gain. So as the dollar strengthened, our net monetary assets provided us a gain basically in the exchange and that was partially offset by incentive comp. So let me pause there, see if there’s any further questions to dig into.

Yes. So thanks that was really helpful. Can you talk a little bit too about your positioning as it relates to tariffs and potential offsets? And have you been able to do anything kind of proactively to better position yourself in terms of exposure or anything you can quantify as well on that front? Thanks.

Yes, maybe I’d say three things, Erin on the tariff side. We’ll start with the obvious. It is a pretty fluid situation. With the Canada and the Mexico pieces on hold for 30 days, I guess as of today only the China piece is currently in place and the impact to Envista from that is relatively small. That of course could change at any time. Which brings me to the second thought it’s one that Eric mentioned in his prepared remarks, until there’s greater clarity and stability as to how things might play out on the tariff front, I just want to underline that we don’t include any tariff related impacts in our 2025 guide. And then third, maybe most importantly, I think what the nut of your question was, while we are a global business and so by definition we’re exposed to various uncertainties, tariffs included, we’re also fairly well positioned to respond to any shifting landscapes. So we’ve long architected our supply chains with a local for local mindset, meaning we aim to source materials in the same country or region where we manufacture. And then we try to serve our customers in a particular country or region from local sources of supply. So, all of our big product categories, all of our largest supply chains have manufacturing on multiple continents. For example, we make spark in Mexico, in Czech Republic and in China. We make consumables in three different countries, we make implants in three different countries, et cetera. So, while the bad news is that uncertainty is high, the good news is that we’re fairly nimble and able to respond to what shifts that just comes down to moving with urgency and executing well. And I think that’s something we’re pretty good at.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

We’ll take our next question from Allen Lutz with Bank of America. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hey, this is Dev on for Allen Lutz at BofA. Thanks for taking my question. I had a couple here just on Spark, multiple quarters of margin expansion there. I think you guys have discussed that quite thoroughly. I’m just trying to quantify that a bit. I think you mentioned double digit declines in unit costs in the last quarter. Is that the right way to think about the cadence of the margin improvement there? Would love some help trying to kind of framing the pace of that gross margin expansion, whether year-over-year or quarterly that’d be great. Thanks.

So I think you’re asking, is there – should you model a double digit unit of reduction every quarter for Spark? Now you’re testing my math. No, I think there’s probably some diminishing returns as we move down that that cost curve. But you should plan on continued unit cost improvement on Spark. And as we talked about on previous calls, certainly an improvement in the market would help. But our improvement to date has not been driven by that. It has been driven by a very organized manufacturing technology strategy. All of the lines have the same design across the three sites. We have a pilot plant in California where we design the innovation and then we roll it out across the lines, across the plants. And so that leads to not only predictable improvement, but it also leads to that flexibility that was in Erin’s question. Similar equipment, similar lines, similar regulatory filings for all the sites. So, if things require response here moving forward, we’re relatively well positioned to do that.

Thanks, Paul. That’s helpful. And then just one clean-up question here on the dealer inventory reduction, I think it was $18 million headwind in 2Q, $12 million in 3Q. I’m just trying to figure out, is that a one-time headwind in full year 2024? Is there a portion of that that’s considered as maybe a reversal or a tailwind in 2025? Or should we maybe think of that as just consumables growth moving more in line with sell-out as we move forward?

Yes. So the latter is really the right point. So since Q2 we’ve been at the inventory – the months of inventory, the weeks of inventory in the channel that we see as healthy and our distribution partners see us healthy. We effectively moved sideways, so no change to that in inventory dollars or in overall weeks on hand in Q3 and Q4. And then to your point, we would like that very much to be similar, consistent in line into 2025. So no real major comp issues to deal with, if you will, when we get into 2025.

Great. Thank you.

We’ll take our next question from Steven Valiquette with Mizuho Securities. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Thanks guys. Thanks for taking my question. So, listen to a couple of calls simultaneously here, but I’m wondering, if anybody touched on the cadence of the EBITDA margin for 2025 yet? I guess with the 14% EBITDA margin guidance for the full year 2025 coming in essentially in line with just the – just reported 4Q result. Just curious whether that EBITDA margin will be in a sort of a tight range quarterly throughout this year or does it step down then revamp? Just want to get more color on that, that you can expand on that further. Thanks.

Yes. Great question. And we haven’t specifically talked about margin cadence. What we did cover in our prepared remarks, and we talked about a bit in a couple of the opening questions and comments is we do expect slightly lower core growth in the first half. We expect slightly better core growth in the second half. For us, a lot of that is based on how we see the progression of China overall and BBP [ph] and effectively a version of what we saw in fourth quarter, which was slower bracket and wire market, slower purchases in Q4 playing out in the first half. And our business is sizable enough in China that, that has an impact on the overall Envista growth rate. So slower core growth first half, a little bit better second half. Spark deferral is also something that we get the headwind back as a tailwind next year in the second half. And then to your question on margin, I would just say, we won’t talk about specific quarter or half margin guide, but because of the healthy gross margins that we have, we will have slightly lower margins than the average in first half and slightly better in the second half as well. I think that’s the easiest way to play it out for now.

Okay. That’s perfect. Thanks.

We’ll take our next question from Brandon Vazquez with William Blair. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hi, everyone. Thanks for taking the question. I wanted to start on dental implants. You guys have had a nice couple of quarters here of improvements, especially on the Nobel side, which is really encouraging. I’m curious if you can – I know this might be a hard kind of exercise, but maybe parse out, as you guys look at improvements, is this simply a factor of your year-over-year comps are a little bit easier? Or are you actually seeing commercial improvements? Or are you seeing improvement in end markets? You had made an interesting comment that full arch cases actually had good growth. That kind of suggested to me that there might have been a little bit of macro in there. So I’m just curious if you could parse any of those out to give a better understanding of how durable the Nobel improvements can be going into 2025?

Yes. Let me see if I can drill down into that. So maybe three things. First, we don’t see a marked improvement in the underlying market, but we did see continued improvement of our business across the year, turning to positive in Q4 for both premium and challenger, both in North America and globally. So without improvement in the market but improvement across our business, we do think that the work we’re doing, the investments we’re making are driving that improvement, and we’re confident in them, and we think that will continue moving forward. The second thing I would say is that we focus a lot understandably on the implant side of Nobel, but we’re seeing good strength across that entire portfolio. Our regenerative and digital solutions businesses both were up nicely in 2024, and our [indiscernible] prosthetics business was also doing very well. So pretty good progression across that portfolio. Now moving into 2025, if we do get a faster return to pre-COVID levels for implants, all of this work that we’re doing in strengthening the business, of course, will benefit us. The rising tide will be better positioned to take advantage of it.

Great. That’s helpful. And on the Spark side, can you just bridge us a little bit on to what are the main contributors to get from where you are today to operating profitability in the back half of 2025? Thank you.

Yes. I mean, our base plan, what we stand behind in our guide to return to profitability in the second half is mostly within our control. It is those manufacturing improvements that I mentioned. We have a whole pipeline of automation steps, lean manufacturing steps and we just roll those out one by one in a very organized consistent way until we have predictable improvements in the unit cost. That’s the main driver of it. On top of that, additional value or additional volume, if our share gains accelerate, that can only help. If the market recovers more quickly, that can only help. And we have been getting a little bit of price on our clear aligner business and that adds to it as well, of course. So a lot of different vectors pointed in a positive direction. And I think you hear that in our enthusiasm for the business. The team is just doing a great job there.

And we’ll take our next question from Vik Chopra with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hey, good evening and thanks for taking the questions. Just two for me. I guess maybe on the first one, on your top line guidance, can you talk about what gets you to the high end versus the low end of that guidance? And then I had a follow-up question, please.

What gets you to the high end of our revenue guide versus the low end? I think it goes back to those upsides that we talked about before. And I would point to the same three, Vik. Spark, as we talked about, a lot of ways that could go better than what’s in the base guide. Our second thing we talked about was implants. That was embedded in the previous question. And then the third, I guess we don’t talk a lot about Diagnostics because that category has been under pressure, but we have a strong position in it. And the category we think has to come back. You can’t operate a dental clinic without diagnostic equipment. You can’t start a dental procedure without some type of diagnostic step. So some version of those break in the right way would get you to the higher end of that range.

Great. That’s helpful. And then good segue into my follow-up question. Maybe just talk about the dental capital equipment environment. What are you hearing from your sales force as they’re out there talking to dental practices and DSOs? Thank you.

I think the question is a capital equipment sales to DSOs? Is that…

Yes, just what are you – yes, what are you seeing in the field? What are you hearing from your sales folks? Just maybe high-level commentary on the capital equipment environment. Thank you.

So let me just take two parts of it. Let me say, what are we hearing from DSOs and then what we’re hearing about capital equipment. The DSO market, I think, is doing pretty well. The stronger getting stronger in that the biggest players, the Heartlands, the Aspens, the MB2s of the world. These are well-run companies. And they have many sites and they’re often in several categories. So the population of suppliers that can really serve them at the levels they need is relatively small. You need to have a good national coverage, a consistent product, sales force coverage. And if you can do it across multiple dental categories, that’s helpful. So we think DSOs are a big opportunity for us. Now with respect to capital equipment, it’s consistent with the commentary we had on the Diagnostics side. You need it to open a clinic, you need it to expand a DSO, but it happens to be a financed category. So it’s sensitive to interest rates. Now there’s been what three interest rate cuts since the fall. That’s helpful, but interest rates still up several hundred basis points from where they were during COVID and pre-COVID. So I think we still need to see cheaper money out there before there’s going to be a sharp inflection in the diagnostic equipment market.

With that, I think we are up against the time. So I’m going to wrap things up here and thank all of you for participating and for your questions. Maybe I’ll close just with a couple of high-level thoughts, reminding everyone why we are so excited about the opportunity we see in front of us. First, at the highest level, dental is a fundamentally attractive category. All of the structural long-term drivers we’ve talked about over time and the high gross margins and the opportunity for pretty attractive economics. Second, Envista is a great company. Leadership positions in some of the very best categories in that attractive dental market. And then third, having been on board now for nine months, it’s clear to me that we have both the capabilities and the culture to turn that potential into improved performance. Hopefully, you’re seeing elements of that across 2024 and I want you to know we’re committed to building on that momentum here in 2025. With that, we’ll wrap it up. Hope you guys can join us on the fifth next month at the Capital Markets Day, and I wish everybody a good day and a great week. Thank you.

This does conclude today’s program. Thank you for your participation. And you may now disconnect.