Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Nu Holdings Conference Call to discuss the results for the Third Quarter of 2024. A slide presentation accompanies today's webcast, which is available on Nu's Investor Relations website www.investors.nu in English and www.investidores.nu in Portuguese. This conference is being recorded and the replay can also be accessed on the company's IR website. This call is also available in Portuguese. [Operator Instructions] [Foreign Language] Please be advised that all participants will be listen-only mode. You may submit online questions at any time today using a Q&A box on the webcast. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Jorg Friedemann, Investor Relations Officer at Nu Holdings. Mr. Friedemann, you may proceed.

Thank you very much, operator, and thank you all for joining our earnings call today. If you have not seen our earnings release, a copy is posted in the results center section of our investor relations website. With me on today's call are David Vélez, our Founder, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Youssef Lahrech, our President and Chief Operating Officer, Guilherme Lago, our Chief Financial Officer and Jag Duggal, our Chief Product Officer. Throughout this conference call, we will be presenting non-IFRS financial information, including adjusted net income. These are important financial measures for Nu Holdings, but are not financial measures as defined by IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures from other companies. Reconciliations of our non-IFRS financial information to the IFRS financial information are available in our earnings press release. Unless noted otherwise, all growth rates are on a year-over-year FX-neutral basis. I would also like to remind everyone that today's discussions might include forward-looking statements, which are not guarantees of future performance, and therefore you should not put undue reliance on them. These statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, and could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. Please refer to the forward-looking statements disclosure in our earnings release. Today, our Founder, Chairman and CEO, David Vélez, will discuss the main highlights of our third quarter 2024. Subsequently, Guilherme Lago, our CFO, and Youssef Lahrech, our President and CEO, will take you through our financial operating performance for the quarter, after which time we will be happy to take your questions. Now I'd like to turn the call over to David. David, please go ahead. David Vélez: Thank you, Jorg. Good evening, everyone, and thank you again for being with us today. In the last quarter, our business model, anchored in…

Thank you, David, and good evening, everyone. As David mentioned, we reported another robust quarter market by sustained revenue growth, enhanced customer engagement, and strong operating margins and profitability. Now let's take a closer look at our third quarter results to gain deeper insights into the progress we have achieved against each of our guiding pillars. Starting with customer acquisition, we experienced strong growth during the quarter, welcoming 5.2 million new customers to our platform. We closed the quarter with 109.7 million customers, reflecting a 23% year-over-year increase. As we continue to add more customers, our focus starts to shift to engaging and retaining them. Our active user base increased by 24% year-over-year, accompanied by another sequential increase in our monthly activity rate, which now stands at 83.6%, up from 82.8% a year ago. This represents the 12th consecutive quarter increase in activity rate, underscoring our ability to consistently provide a compelling value proposition to our customers. Moving on to revenue expansion. The first chart on Slide 10 shows that Nu has established primary banking accounts with approximately 60% of our active customer base. This strong performance highlights our ability to capture a larger share of wallet among our customer base. Additionally, we are very pleased to see how recent cohorts are reaching this level of principality at an accelerated rate. As shown in the chart in the middle of this slide, the average number of products per active customer now stands at 4, highlighting the effectiveness of our cross-selling strategy even as we rapidly onboard more and more new customers. By successfully introducing our products to these new customers, we reinforce our position as their primary banking partner. The final chart shows the combined impact of these two powerful dynamics. Significant customer engagement, as depicted in the first chart,…

Thank you, Lago. Good evening, everybody. Starting with NPL trends, our leading indicator to 15 to 90 NPL ratio declined once again during the third quarter, dropping 10 basis points from last quarter to 4.4%. 90-plus NPLs increased by 20 basis points to 7.2%, also in line with expectations. Recall that 90-plus behaves as a stock rather than flow metric in the sense that this quarter's 90-plus houses inventory that was in 15 to 90 from one quarter ago all the way to three quarters ago. Thus, to understand the movement in 90-plus from last quarter to this quarter, you have to trace it back to the change in 15 to 90 from four quarters ago all the way to last quarter. As discussed in past earnings calls, we are intentionally and strategically growing our lending book and expanding down the credit spectrum where we see attractive opportunities. In line with our credit philosophy, we prioritize decisions that optimize the net present value of the lifetime of our customer relationships rather than focusing solely on short-term NPL metrics. When we identify asset classes or customer segments with compelling risk-adjusted returns that promote responsible customer behavior, we actively pursue growth in these areas in line with our strategy of pursuing primary banking relationship status with increasing engagement and cross-selling and up-selling over time. As we will show in the following slides, this strategy has yielded increased revenue and greater resilience, more than offsetting the higher delinquency rates that come with it, all within our risk appetite. This slide shows asset quality trends, both 15-90 and 90-plus NPLs, this time on the basis of interest earning balances rather than total receivables. Here you can see a stable to declining trend in the last few years. This demonstrates that we have been rewarded for the additional risk we've taken, reinforcing our strategic decision to focus on maximizing NPV, i.e. the lifetime value of customer relationships rather than solely optimizing delinquency metrics. Aligned with the growth pace of our credit portfolio and early delinquency performance, credit loss allowance expenses increased by 6% on an FX neutral basis to $774 million this quarter. Finally, risk-adjusted NIM decreased by 90 basis points in the quarter as a result of the 140 basis point decrease in NIM as explained by Lago earlier, which was partially offset by a 50 basis point improvement in cost of risk. On a year-on-year basis, risk-adjusted NIM increased by 110 basis points, underscoring once again the result of our focus on optimizing the lifetime value of our customer relationship cohorts. With that, we're now ready to take your questions.

Thank you very much. We will now start the Q&A session for investors and analysts. [Operator Instructions]. I would like to turn the call over to Mr. Jorg Friedemann, Investor Relations Officer.

Thank you, operator. And our first question comes from the line of Jorge Kuri at Morgan Stanley.

Hi, everyone. Thanks for taking my question and congrats on the great numbers. I wanted to ask about Nu sell. Can you maybe share with us what's the business model like? What is the revenue model? Are you charging a commission? Are you renting the network and then creating your own revenue or just basically passing on the revenues to the carriers? What are the unit economics? How profitable this could be? How do you see this impacting your financials over time? Is this something that could potentially be material, such consensus be start thinking about it, or is this sort of like an add-on that adds to the overall ecosystem without necessarily becoming a big part of your P&L? David Vélez: Thank you. Jorge here, David. Thank you for your question. So listen, take a little step back. When I go back 10 years in time and I remember the industries that we were discussing around opportunity for disruption in Brazil and Latin America, there were two classes of industries that were in the companies that were disliked the most by Brazilians. The first ones were banks, the second ones were telecoms. That has changed over the past 10 years. We like to think maybe because we brought more competition in the industry, but on the telecom side, there's still a lot of opportunity to improve consumer experience. The NPS is low. The general offering for consumers is very complex. Seven, when we talk to customers, seven out of the 10 things that customers talk the most about their plans is around the user experience. There is too many different plans, too many different bonuses, too many different footnotes and just overall too much complexity. So, that combination of an industry that has hundreds of millions of lines in…

Thank you, David. That was very clear. David Vélez: Thank you, Jorge.

And our next question comes from the line of Mario Pierry at Bank of America.

Hey guys, thank you for taking my question. Let me focus on the current business rather than the future business. When we look at your risk adjusted net interest margin, it declined. When I look on a nominal terms, when I look at the margin itself also declined a few basis points. And I get that part of this has to do with a change in mix, you're doing more secure lending. But I was wondering as this continues to happen, I think that's part of the strategy, how does that impact your profitability in the short term? Because it seems to me like you're moving away from a very profitable product, which is credit cards to a product that is more secure, but less profitable, especially when we look at the payroll loan market in Brazil, given that you have regulated prices there. So I'm just trying to understand how do you see the evolution of risk adjusted margins as you continue to shift your loan mix? Thank you.

Thank you. Hi Mario, this is Lago, thank you so much for your question. When we look at our business portfolio, they are certainly composed by asset classes with a very different kind of risk returns, provided that none of those asset classes are expected to yield us returns on equity of less than 30%. So yes, the first product that we had, credit card, has a phenomenal set of unit economics both in Brazil and Mexico and Colombia, lending as well, and we are by no means moving away from those asset classes, we are actually adding additional asset classes to that portfolio without necessarily diluting the unit economics of the prior ones. In my view, Mario, when you take a look at our balance sheet, we still have a loan-to-deposit ratio of about 30% to 35%, depending on how you cut it. So by and large, two-thirds of all of the deposits that we have are sitting idle in treasury bonds. So as we shift the allocations from treasury bonds into credit assets, both secured and unsecured, you should expect to see NIMs expanding going forward, you should expect to see risk adjusted margins expanding going forward. What has been kind of the rationale behind the contraction in NIMs in the third quarter of 2024? I think it is the composition of three things. Number one, we have seen increasing kind of funding costs in our business in Mexico and Colombia, given our strategy to aggressively pay higher deposit rates in those countries. And as such, it has now shrunk the NIMs on a consolidated basis. Going forward, we do expect to bring some of those deposit rates in Mexico and Colombia down as we have been doing sequentially quarter-over-quarter. So that's the first thing. The second thing within our credit portfolio in Brazil, you started to allude, yes, we are seeing the average yield go down, primarily because of mix, like secure lending gaining more weight, but also because of price elasticity, even within credit card, as we improve and optimize the price elasticity models, we have been able to play around with lower rates in order to maximize the NPV and the lifetime economics of the customers. So in a nutshell, we do not expect the movement into new asset classes to contract NIMs or risk adjusted NIMs. On the contrary, it should expand as we increase loan-to-deposit ratios.

Okay, that's clear. Let me follow up then, when we look at your credit cards, when I look at TPV, it contracted quarter-over-quarter and you are at a point where you have been gaining market share. So I wanted to understand then, when we look at this purchase volume, why did it decline quarter-over-quarter? And my question also has to do, like when I look at the number of cards outstanding in Brazil, it seems like it declined by 100,000, right, from 38.1 million to 38 million this quarter, even though you added 3.4 million clients in Brazil. So what is this data telling me, are you at the point where you already are at a certain level of market share that would be hard for you to gain market share from where we are right now?

Yes. No, it's a good question, Mario. I think just let me try to address those two points that you've raised specifically and then I'll try to provide a general review on market share and credit cards. So first, I will draw your attention to Slides 27 and 28 of our earnings presentation. And you will see that our purchase volume in Brazil, Mexico and Colombia, but mostly in Brazil have not contracted, they have actually expanded on an FX neutral basis. You should note that there has been a material FX devaluation in the third quarter of 2024. I think that the devaluation in Brazil has been between 4% and 5%, the devaluation in Mexico has been between 10% and 11%. So if you do an FX neutral adjustment, you will see that PV has actually gone up in the third quarter. And then if you look at the PV for Brazil, which you highlighted, Mario, is over the past 12 months, PV in Brazil for Nubank has grown by about 24%, which is about twice the growth of the PV in the industry. That means that we have, of course, increased market share. If you look at it in terms of receivables, the credit card receivables of Nubank Brazil do increase by about 32%, which is almost 3 to 4x the increase in credit card receivables of the industry. So again, the market share continues to grow. So when you look at every single segment in which we play, the less affluent, the more affluent as well as the total market share, we continue to gain no market share at a fairly good pace. Our estimates that in terms of credit card receivables in Brazil, our market share has grown by about 300 to 310 basis points over…

Okay, that's clear. When I was talking about the purchase volume of credit cards decelerating, I was looking in BRL and I saw a growth of 3% quarter-on-quarter and you were growing like 8% previous quarter. You were growing at a higher pace. But okay, no, yes, your answer is very clear. Thank you.

Thank you, Mario.

And our next question comes from the line of Tito Labarta from Goldman Sachs.

Hi, good evening, everyone. Thank you for the call and taking my question. My question, following up a little bit on the decline in NIM, but Lago, you have mentioned that you're intentionally slowing the pace of eligibility for Pix financing and trying to get some more data there. Just want to understand, are you concerned about asset quality? Is it just the strong pace at which you've grown over the last year? What's giving you a little bit more caution there? And will that be maybe a short-term headwind for your ability to expand NIM, let's say at least for the next few quarters, as you get to more comfort there?

No, Tito, thanks for the question. Look, so we continue to be super excited with the Pix and Boleto financing products within the credit card family. The demand for this product is enormous. And the unit economics of this product is very strong. Now we do often pursue optimizations of the risk-return strategies of every single asset class. They are not kind of a straight line. So there are times in which we accelerate, there are times in which we decelerate. So over the past one or two quarters, we have slowed down intentionally the pace of eligibility expansion in Pix financing to kind of watch how those cohorts will continue to perform. And if they continue to perform well as they have, most likely we will resume growth over the course of the coming quarters. We do see kind of the Pix financing family of products as a strategic feature and product that we offer to our customers and something that actually leverages on many of the strengths of Nubank in Brazil. As you know, we have about one in every four Pix transactions in the country go through Nubank. So the flow of data is super strong and gives us and our customers the ability to develop and enjoy new financing products. So now we do expect to continue to grow this product in the coming quarters and years. We are just now taking a pause to see how the overall performance of the recent cohorts continue to perform.

Okay. That's helpful. Thank you for that. And then I guess just another follow up on the margin, cause you had strong growth in deposits again, I know you're overpaying a bit in Mexico to kind of grow that deposit base. Would you consider maybe reducing the remuneration further either in Brazil or Mexico to help sort of on the funding side of things, particularly with high rates in Brazil and then conversely in Mexico, I saw that there was some October data where your loans jumped like 10% in October. So it seems like maybe you're getting more comfort to grow the loan book in Mexico. How do you think about the outlook for loan growth in Mexico from here?

Yes. So just addressing some of your questions head on. In Brazil, we do not expect to lower the Cuenta yields or the deeper rates. We believe we have a very good balance of value proposition for our consumers and we are very pleased with the capital structure that we have in the country. So we do not foresee any material change in the short term. In Mexico and Colombia, we have been very positively surprised with the evolution of our deposits strategy in both of those countries. Not only we have seen kind of deposits increasing by substantially -- at substantially higher pace than we expected, but we have seen material second order impacts from the inflows of those deposits. What do I mean by that? I see the deposits has brought in now many more customers, but many more customers who also to whom we were able to cross-sell other products such as credit cards and now personal loans in Mexico and in soon Colombia. And we have also seen a marginal improvement in the mix of those customers that have allowed us to expand the eligibility and approval rates. And secondly, as was the case in Brazil, the inflow of deposits also comes with an avalanche of additional credit on the writing data that is now a super important raw material to feed our credit and customer segmentation model. So really pleased there. And as Tito, we improve the value proposition of their experiences with Nubank, we will consider progressively optimizing the cost of our liability and yes, potentially continue to lower deeper rates in Mexico and Colombia. In Mexico, just to have an illustration, I think we launched the deposits in Mexico back in the first quarter of 2024. We launched that paying 15% per year. At that point in time, it was around 400 basis points above the interbank deposit rates. Now we are now at 12.5% per year, which is only 200 basis points above the interbank deposit rates. And yes, we may bring this down going forward. But I think the most important benefit that we will have in NIMs is actually going to be on the expansion of the asset side of the balance sheet. And we are super pleased with the prospects that we have to increase the loan book in Mexico. It's performing fairly well and we have resumed growth as you have seen in the recent numbers, building the ones that we have posted with the regulators, I believe, yes, they are today.

Okay, perfect. Great. So it does seem like that could be a driver of growth going forward here?

Yes. Absolutely.

Great. Thank you, Lago.

And our next question comes from the line of Geoff Elliott from Autonomous.

Hello, thanks very much for taking the question. The credit card Stage 3s increased from 9.1% to 9.8%. Can you give us a bit more detail on what's happening there? And specifically on Pix's credit, how has the performance of that portfolio been evolving? Thank you.

Hi, Jeff. This is Youssef. Thanks for the question. So Stage 3, the kind of shorthand that I think about is it's very correlated to what's happening to 90 plus. It tends to evolve in a similar way. It tends to behave like a stock metric. So what you're seeing is kind of consistent with the trend in 90 plus. When you look at more of a flow metric on late-stage delinquencies, I would invite you to take a look on page 30 at both the NPL formation and the Stage 3 formation. And both indicators, if you take a look, actually declined in the quarter, 40 and 60 basis points respectively. So we see actually improvement from that standpoint on those two metrics. And with respect to your question on Pix's financing, as Lago mentioned just a minute ago, we continue to be very pleased with both the consumer demand for that product and the economics of that product. The returns are phenomenal. And so, the recent deceleration is by no means an indication of concern on either. It's more of kind of technical adjustments we make on the business as usual basis that we've done in the past in a number of products and customer segments.

Got it. Thanks very much.

And our next question comes from the line of John Coffey of Barclays.

Great. Thank you very much for taking my question. One theme that I've noticed in a lot of your answers is when you're talking about your NIM, I think you said that the NIM will improve when your loan-to-deposit rate improves, which makes a lot of sense. I was wondering if you could just maybe broadly say what's holding you back on having that rate more? Is it that you have capital and you're not using these assets and you're not able to convert those into loans just yet because you're still testing the market, perhaps in Mexico or Colombia? Were there any other reasons that might be sort of pulling back that ratio from rising more?

John, thank you. Thanks for the question. So let me try to split the response into I think in between Brazil on one hand, the Mexico and Colombia on the other hand. So Brazil, we already have a fairly stable liability and deposit franchise and we have been growing the asset side of the balance sheet at a relatively good pace. Depending on the assets that you look, the overall portfolio has grown at about 47%, 50% year-over-year. The lending side, which is the one that consumes more funding, more than credit card in Brazil, it has in fact grown by about 90% to 100% year-over-year. So Brazil's assets is in a fast cruise control speed there and we expect loan-to-deposits to continue to go up. In Mexico and Colombia, they are more recent markets and therefore we continue to develop our credit underwriting capabilities. When we entered those markets, we did see that differently from Brazil, our core product, which was credit card, was more funding intensive due to the credit card cycle. So the first thing that we wanted to do was to de-risk the funding part of the business and therefore we have been more aggressive on raising deposits from local currency, general public, mostly retail deposits. Now that we have a very strong and healthy right side of the balance sheet, we are accelerating the growth of the left side of the balance sheet. And you have started to see a strong growth in the loan book of Mexico and Colombia and I believe you will not only continue to see this in the next quarters, but most likely it will even go up as we improve and sharpen our credit underwriting capabilities. But the main bottlenecks that we have to continue to grow the asset sides in Mexico and Colombia and to a certain extent also in Brazil, certainly not capital. We have plenty of capital to deploy, certainly not funding. We have now plenty of funding to deploy against those opportunities. It's really our credit underwriting appetite to be able to cherry-pick the most compelling risk-adjusted returns for our company.

Thank you very much. I just have one quick follow-up. This might be more for you, Youssef. On the 15 to 90-day NPLs, I know those decreased 10-bps quarter-by-quarter. Can you help us decrypt a little bit more how that breaks out from seasonality versus getting more exposure to riskier loans? Is it straightforward or are there too many moving pieces to really break that out?

It's pretty straightforward, to be honest. Seasonality typically is in the range of 10 to 20 basis points. What we see is largely along seasonal lines as opposed to indicative of any wholesale changes in the asset.

Okay, so it's normally 10 to 20 down from Q2 to Q3?

That's about right.

But you're also having more exposure to a riskier credit book, so I'd almost expect that would have maybe gone up or netted out to zero. It doesn't seem like that's happening?

No, there are offsetting forces, as we've talked about before. So you have increased specs of secured loans within the lending book. You have continued expansions in credit cards. Then you have some of the tactical adjustments we've executed through the last quarter. Those tend to offset each other. We've seen relative stability in the last quarter on that thing.

Perfect. Thank you very much.

And our next question comes from the line of Neha Agarwala from HSBC.

Hi, thank you for taking my question. Just a quick one on the provisioning level. When we go back to the 1Q numbers and the strong pickup in originations, which was the explanation for the strong pickup in the provisioning level, nominally speaking. When we look at this quarter, there was a very strong pickup, especially in personal loans, which grew 20% quarter-on-quarter. But the provisions grew only 6% quarter-on-quarter. So could you please explain what was different this quarter and why did we not see a stronger pickup in provisioning, whereas the origination was quite strong? And also the cost of risk sequentially remained largely stable. So there's probably some impact from shift in mix, but given the stronger growth in personal loans, I would expect cost of risk to go up. So if you could zoom in on that, that would be very helpful?

Yes, Neha, this is Youssef. Thanks for the question. So again, I would point out to some of the offsetting forces that I just talked about. And in particular, when you look at lending, the fastest growing element within that is secured lending, which carries very little risk and hence has lower coverage ratios. So that would explain in part what is going on. And even in unsecured lending, we've seen slightly better asset quality than expected. So you see a bit of an effect there, too.

And our next question comes from the line of Eduardo Rosman at BTG.

Hi, everyone. I wanted to get an update in Mexico. Maybe if that view could help us -- I think you've been delivering better and faster KPIs compared to what you did in Brazil. But I wanted to know if you think that Mexico is ready for the same impact you had in Brazil, right? Do you think Mexico can be relevant within your results in the next three years or should we expect to be more relevant further in the future? Thanks. David Vélez: Sure. Thank you for the question. So, I mean, listen, Mexico is an opportunity that net-net I think could be another Brazil for us, but there are some differences to Brazil, some positives and some harder to crack. The positives are it's a higher income per capita country than Brazil. And you also have a lower bank penetration, lower credit card penetration. And that's a challenge as well as an opportunity with 12% credit card penetration. We could be if we crack the code of providing credit to the bank population. That would be a huge competitive advantage versus in Brazil where we found a market that was much more saturated with many more competitors. Now, it's going to be -- it's probably going to take a little bit longer to really reach the levels of market share that we have in Brazil, because cracking giving credit to the underbanked or the unbanked is just harder. And we're here for a long run. We don't want to do anything unnatural or learning how to do that requires a lot of discipline, a lot of methodology, a lot of data, a lot of foundational testing. And it's a quarter we accelerate, a quarter we pause and a quarter we accelerate or deaccelerate. So you'll see those…

No, great, David. Thank you very much. David Vélez: Thank you.

And our next question comes from Yuri Fernandes at JP Morgan.

Thank you, guys. Well, most of the strategic questions were already asked. So I'll go to the tax rate that was, I would say, a highlight in this part. When you go to your financial statement, we see the other line, the other tax shield. And basically it says that it's tax EFT bonds and other things. So just trying to understand what happened with tax rate. If this is just a seasonality, as we saw in 3Q 2023, I think back last year was Lei do Bem. So just trying to understand if this is a level that is sustainable for tax rate or we should see rates returning back to 33%, 34%, 35%? Thank you.

Yuri, thanks so much for the question. I think in this quarter, there were two things in our income statement that I believe are worth highlighting in the call. One is a non-recurring event and the other one is a seasonal event. So what is the non-recurring event? So in the third quarter of 2024, we decided to reposition Nucoin, which is our loyalty program in a way that we would discontinue the crypto liquidity pool that was allocated to this program initially. Does no shift in the program require us to absorb a one time non-recurring charge of about $48 million that was fully absorbed in marketing and in general. So that is completely non-recurring. We should not expect this to have any additional impact to our performance. If it was not for this one time event, our efficiency ratio would have been even below 30%, so that one is completely non-recurring. With respect to the second point, which I believe you've asked on corporate income tax or the effective tax rate. That is more of a seasonal thing than a non-recurring thing. And you corrected pointed out, just like it happened in the third quarter of 2023, we have in the third quarter, a concentration in the filings for Lei do Bem, which is an R&D tax incentive that exists in Brazil that we also had in the third quarter of 2024. And that should be recurring and should continue with similar seasonalities in the coming quarters and years.

Super clear. Thank you very much, Lago.

And our next question comes from Henrique Navarro at Santander.

Hi, thanks for the opportunity to make a question. I would like to do a follow up on the question on the growth mismatch between provisions and loans. I understand the rationale. You're changing the credit mix adding more secure personal loans. But my question is, if we look forward, the macro environment has been deteriorating. We have a higher estimates, et cetera. And under the expected credit loss provisioning model, we need to consider the macro environment to do our calculations. So my question is, what is the rationale for this behavior between provisions and loans? I mean, is there a risk that eventually you may need to reinforce provisions ahead? That's it. Thank you.

Hi, Henrique. This is Youssef. Thanks for the question. So, look, yes, we do take into account macro scenarios in our provision setting. They are one of many factors, as you know, that impact the provision model. But I would say that the dominant effect is, both the nature, the mix of assets and the performance of assets we put on book. And so I think, what you see in the financial statements reflect our best estimate in terms of coverage ratio. And as I mentioned, when you look at loans specifically, probably the main driver this quarter has been the accelerated growth of secured, which tend to drive coverage down vis-à-vis unsecured.

Thank you.

And our next question comes from the line of Pedro Leduc at Itaú.

Hi, guys. Thank you so much for the call and taking my question. Sorry to go back to the NIM piece. The first part of the question is easier. If you did have any of the credit card regulatory cap impacts on the NII or gross interest accrual for credit cards, other players mentioned it this season, and also if the renegotiated book took some part in the NII slowdown as well. Okay? And then the second piece to all of this, in the call you mentioned that you expect the NIM post-costal risk to improve going forward. Asset side, you mentioned funding, Mexico. But as I think about the main answer why it fell, you know, that the mix, that this secured portfolio is usually more stickier. So I would expect with the compounding effect to do have a more prolonged effect on the NIM post-cost risk. So really trying to get a little more color on how in the shape of this recovery that you're imagining? Thank you.

Yes, Pedro, let me share some thoughts on this and then maybe Youssef can chime in as well. So with respect to the NIM in this quarter, one thing I would highlight, which adds a little bit of complexity to the calculation is also how FX has behaved throughout the third quarter of 2024. If you take a look at the average FX, which is the FX that is used to translate income statement and the end of period FX, which is the FX that is used to translate balance sheet items. You will note that the average FX has depreciated and the end of period FX has appreciated. So you're actually translating less dollars in the income statement divided by balance sheet items, which have kind of a higher amount of dollars. So you would see, if you adjust the FX both ways, a much less pronounced deterioration in NIMs, as you say. So I think that is the first part to your question, Leduc. The second part, which is where we see is all else equal. If we continue to have the same credit cards unsecured and we just increase the secure lending in our book and that increase in secure lending leads to an increase in loan to deposit ratio. We would be basically shifting money that is currently sitting at [indiscernible] in treasury bonds and placing it with secure lending. So all else equal, it should actually lead to an expansion of NIMs and an expansion of risk adjusted net interest margins as well. The problem is that the all else equal never happened. So you do see continuous growth in deposits in Mexico and Colombia, so on and so forth. But we do not agree with the notion that the growth of our secure portfolio per se will lead to a dilution in NIMs or even in returns on equity. It should lead to increasing loan to deposits and an expansion in both of those metrics.

Thank you.

And our next question comes from the line of William Tang at SIG.

Hey guys, thanks for taking my question. I just have one for you here. Can you talk about the competitive market you see around secured lending, particularly in Brazil? Nu has clearly done incredibly well on the unsecured front. But how do the operating dynamics change when you start to think about leaving your mark on the secured front? How sticky are customers when thinking about shifting away from existing providers to Nubank? Thank you very much.

No, thank you so much. This is a super important question for us, one that we debate and study at length. And the experience that we have had so far with the secured lending, which is a longer journey, seems to be quite encouraging. So within secured lending, there are basically three types of assets. You have the public payroll loans, you have FGTS, and you have investment backed loans. The first two account for about 90% of the loans that we originated and 90% of the book. So that is the lion's shares of our operations there. And in fact, the FGTS backed loans has accounted for the majority of the originations and the majority of our book today. In FGTS loans, which is the asset class for which we believe we already have reached at product parity, our origination is estimated to account for about 25% of the origination of the market. So very strong. And it does support the view that you can have a very successful direct-to-consumer digital only distribution channel. And we expect to continue to increase our FGTS market share in the coming quarters as we leverage on our low cost base to offer the product and the best user experience, best user interface and the lowest price points. Now, as we move into public payroll loans, we have been launching only two collateral agreements so far, which are the two largest ones, INSS and SIAPE. We have recently made fairly important improvements in those products for INSS. We've launched refinancing in November '24. SIAPE, we are going to launch refinancing in December 2024. And then over the coming quarters, we're going to add nine collateral agreements to the offer. So we expect that by December 2024, we will be launching the collateral agreements with the armed forces, and throughout 2025, many new collateral agreements with some of the largest states and municipalities in Brazil. So as we have seen with the success that we have had with FGTS, so too we expect to see kind of at the ramp up of public payroll loans there. And why do we think we are competitive out there? We think we are competitive because not only we have the best UX and UI, but the fact that we do direct-to-consumers, we have much lower customer acquisition costs, much lower cost to serve, which translates into much better prices to consumers in one of the industries in Brazil that offers the highest price elasticity points.

Thank you, Lago. We have now surpassed 75 minutes of this session. So we are now concluding today's call on behalf of Nu Holdings and of our investor relations team. I want to thank you very much for your time and participation in our earnings call tonight. We are excited with our developments as we continue strengthening our position in the markets we operate. Over the coming days, we will be following up with the questions received via our platform and with those that attempted, but we're not able to ask questions tonight. So please do not hesitate to reach out to our team if you have any further questions. Thank you and have a very good night.

The Nu Holdings conference call has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.