Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to Nu Holdings Conference Call to discuss the results for the First Quarter of 2023. A slide presentation is accompanying today's webcast, which is available in Nu’s Investors Relations website www.investors.nu in English and www.investidores.nu in Portuguese. This conference is being recorded and the replay can also be accessed on the company's IR website. This call is also available in Portuguese. To access, you can press the globe icon on the lower right side of your Zoom screen, and then choose to enter the Portuguese room. After that, select mute original audio. [Foreign Language] Please be advised that all participants will be in listen-only mode. You may submit online questions at any time today using the Q&A box on the webcast. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Jorg Friedemann, Investor Relations Officer at Nu Holdings. Mr. Friedemann, you may proceed.

Thank you very much, operator, and thank you all for joining our earnings call today. If you have not seen our earnings release, a copy is posted in the results intersection of our Investor Relations website. With me on today's call are, David Velez, our Founder, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman; Youssef Lahrech, our President and Chief Operating Officer; and Guilherme Lago, our Chief Financial Officer. Additionally, Jag Duggal, our Chief Product Officer, will join us for the Q&A session of the call. Throughout this conference call we will be presenting non-IFRS financial information, including adjusted net income. These are important financial measures for the Company, but are not financial measures as defined by IFRS. Reconciliations of the Company's non-IFRS financial information to the IFRS financial information are available in our earnings press release. Unless noted otherwise, all growth rates are on a year-over-year FX neutral basis. I would also like to remind everyone that today's discussion might include forward-looking statements, which are not guarantees of future performance and therefore you should not put undue reliance on them. These statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties and could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations. Please refer to the forward-looking statements disclosure in the Company's earnings press release. Today our Founder and CEO, David Velez will discuss the main highlights of our first quarter 2023 results and provide an overview of our Brazilian operations. Subsequently, Guilherme Lago, our CFO, and Youssef Lahrech, our President and COO, will take you through our financial and operating performance for the quarter, after which time we’ll be happy to take your questions. Now, I would now like to turn the call over to David. David, please go ahead.

Thank you, Jorg. Good evening, everyone, and thank you for being with us today. Once again, in a quarter marked by general concerns about economic activity and asset quality in the markets we operate. The soundness of effectively all our financial indicators remained very strong attesting to the resilience of our business model and the execution of our team. So I will show in the next few slides. We continue to deliver a rare combination of strong growth and increasing profitability through the ups and downs of our market. In the first quarter, our numbers continued to demonstrate the compounded effect of our platform's high growth, combined with increasing profitability provided by our business model. Revenue surpassed $1.6 billion, expanding 87% year-over-year. Our gross profit reached $651 million, a 124% year-over-year increase and our gross margin again surpassed the 40% threshold this quarter, reaching the highest level since 2021. This continued revenue growth with gross margin expansion enabled a significant increase in net income, reaching $141.8 million or 145% quarter-over-quarter growth rate versus last quarter's DSA adjusted net income. Adjusted net income reached $182.4 million, an increase of 60% quarter-over-quarter. Meanwhile, we also continue to expand our customer base at a strong clip ending the quarter with 79.1 clients. Net ads were very strong in Brazil where we welcomed 4.4 million customers during the quarter. Our activity levels remain robust at 82% even as we add more and more customers demonstrating the intense engagement capacity of our platform. This slide offers a high level overview of our recent financial performance trends, highlighting our ability to increase revenue, while expanding profits. Over the past two years, Nu was able to double the number of customers from 37 million in early 2021 to more than 79 million at the end of the…

Thanks, David. Good evening, everyone. As David mentioned, we deliver another quarter of strong operating and financial KPIs. We did so by leveraging the same simple, powerful value generating strategy that we have now employed for a few years. This strategy can be summarized by three guiding principles. First, continue to grow our customer base in the markets in which we operate and quickly converting new customers into active ones. Second, expanding average revenue per active customer or ARPAC through both cross-selling and upselling. And third, delivering growth while maintaining one of the lowest operating costs in the industry. Much like in prior periods, our first quarter results showcase how we continue to execute against each one of these pillars. Let's dive deeper. During the first quarter, our customer base increased at a solid pace, we added 4.5 million customers for a total of 79.1 million, a 33% increase year-over-year. In Brazil, our pace for monthly net adds continued at almost 1.5 million customers. The vast majority of which still come from referrals, which means lower acquisition costs, and faster activation. Our client base in Mexico and Colombia also evolved positively and will likely accelerate even further once we are able to have our checking accounts up and running in both countries. This has already happened in Mexico, where we have just crossed the level of 500,000 checking accounts open in less than a week after our official launch of Cuenta Nu. Once we add customers, our goal is to activate and have them engage with our platforms and love us fanatically. On this base, the first quarter was also a success. Our monthly activity rate increased to 82.1%, up from 78.0% a year ago. The ninth consecutive quarterly increase. We are seeing positive and increasing momentum in activity in…

Thank you, Lago, and good evening to you all. Let me take you through some of the key indicators of asset quality and credit portfolio health for the first quarter of 2023. Let's start with NPL trends. Seasonally, the first quarter represents a high point for early-stage delinquencies. Specifically, 15 to 90 NPLs rise on average by 80 basis points going from Q4 to Q1 based on our historical data and in line with the rest of the market. In Q1 2023, our 15 to 90 NPL ratio came in at 4.4%, increasing by 70 basis points from the fourth quarter of last year, which is 10 basis points lower than our historical trend. This slightly lower than seasonal norm increase was mainly driven by the improvement in our personal loan portfolio itself a result of the actions we took last year. Our 90-plus NPL ratio increased from 5.2% to 5.5%, as a result of the normal flow through delinquency buckets. As we discussed in the past, 90-plus is a stock rather than flow metric, so you get this sort of stacking dynamic over time. And since we do not and have not sold any delinquent loans, we do not get the purging effect of asset sales, which would artificially lower NPLs. With respect to loan renegotiations, they remained at around 8% of the book in the first quarter, with approximately half of those coming from customers who are current and not past due at the time of renegotiation. This is a result of us making it very easy for our customers to have active control over their finances. Many of them take advantage of that feature and go directly to the Nu app to edit their loan and payment schedule and make them more convenient and better synchronized. This…

Thanks, Youssef. As we wrap up, I wanted to leave you with some thoughts about the future. This week, we're turning 10-years old, and we couldn't be more excited about what's ahead for Nu. In 10-years, we've been able to amass a combination of skills and capabilities that position us at a very differentiated place. As a result of working extremely hard on our mission of fighting complexity to empower our people, we have built one of the most loved and trusted brands in Brazil and increasingly in Mexico and Colombia. We have reached significant scale in Brazil, allowing us to reach a level of operating efficiency that we can pass now on to our customers we have better and better products at lower prices, enabling an accelerating flywheel. We have gathered significant data sophisticated data infrastructure, which is increasingly a key piece of our product design and artificial intelligence strategy. We have built unique capabilities in credit underwriting and financial services, helping us to develop a profit engine that we will use to reinvest in our services, verticals and geographies. And finally, we believe we have assembled one of the best technology and product teams in the world, unique for a Latin American company. These ingredients are important pieces to what we decide to now go build over the next 10 years. And as we plan for the long run, we think there is an opportunity to see ourselves more as a consumer platform that enables the optimization of money on behalf of its users. We have named this new category Money platform. The Money platform is a technology platform that has the optimization of money on behalf of its users at its core, the same way that a social platform has social interactions such as texts or photos…

We will now start the Q&A session for investors and analysts. [Operator Instructions] I would like to turn the call over to Mr. Jorg Friedemann, Investor Relations Officer.

Thank you, operator. And the first question comes from the line of Jorge Kuri at Morgan Stanley.

Him, everyone. Good afternoon and congrats on the fantastic numbers and congrats also on your 10-year anniversary. I wanted to ask about payroll loans, evidently a big product that you are doing either on a beta testing or already launched. And I wanted to see if you can share with us some of the results that you're seeing so far, what type of cross-selling are you getting? Is it mostly INSS? Is it mostly government workers? What type of rates and maturities are you seeing your customers take? What is this doing to your ARPAC? If you can share sort of like what the ARPAC would be for a payroll loan? What does it do for your return on equity? So that we understand as that business ramps up, how does it change your KPIs? Thank you.

Jorge, thank you so much for your question. This is Lago. Look, I'll try to share some of my thoughts, and then I'll pass it to Jag to complement with the recent experience that we have had. But entering payroll loans to us is a super important venture, not only from a financial perspective, but also from a strategic perspective. I think, first, you have to step back and realize that payroll loan is the single largest asset class that you have in consumer finance in Brazil. It accounts for about BRL560 billion of loans in the country and one of the largest profit pools that you have in the region. And our customers, if we take the social security numbers of our customers and if we take them to the Brazilian Central Bank database, they already account for about 31% of the entire payroll loans in Brazil. So that means that we don't need to fish outside of our fish ball to tap into one-third of this very, very large market. And we intend to do so no collateral agreement after collateral agreement. We started with CRP, which is the payroll loans offer to federal public servants. But we have also announced that we will follow this with INSS, which is payroll loans for pension years and retirees, and we intend to expand this progressively as we learn more about the product. What are the unit economics of the product for us, Jorge? And how do we expect this to impact our overall economics as a company? So the APR, the interest rates of payroll loans are smaller than those of credit cards and unsecured personal loans. They range anywhere between 1.5% and 2% per month. But conversely, payroll loans offer one of the lowest, if not the lowest, delinquency levels that we have in the industry and also a very low regulatory capital requirement. It's about 50% of the regulatory capital requirements that you would need for unsecured personal loans. The consequence of this compounding effect and to the fact that we will not use loan brokers, we will do direct-to-consumer originations, and therefore, we will remove about 15% to 18% in origination cost is a product that we expect to provide us with ROEs at or higher than 30%. Therefore, we expect two things to happen in our overall company economics: One, the acceleration of the personal loan books; secondly, a progressive reduction in delinquencies overall. But Jag, I will let you comment on our recent experience and how excited our customers are with this product.

Thank you, Lago. Thank you for the question, Jorge. I'll just complement a couple of things that Lago said as he laid out the big picture. From a product perspective, it is still early days. We launched the product and are still rolling it out in April. But we followed a pretty classic Nubank formula of launching a mobile product that is very simple to sign up for direct-to-consumer with a very transparent set of pricing and terms and conditions. What we are hearing from the early customers, who have started to engage with us on consignado, particularly is CRP consignado is genuine delight with the simplicity of the sign-up flow of the transparency of the product, how easy it is to understand. And we are in the midst of testing a fairly wide range, wide spectrum of pricing, which we will optimize over time. But what we found is a set of customers, who are extremely reactive to the pricing and the fact that we can leverage our cost advantage, as Lago alluded to, to give customers a fair price. So that combination of a fair price, along with a simple mobile product, has given us a response that has exceeded our expectations in the early stages of rollout. We are being very careful and stepwise in that rollout process to get the product, the pricing and the experience right, but we couldn't be more encouraged in the first month or so that we've put the product out there. As Lago mentioned, consignado CRP is just the first step of our payroll lending road map through this year and beyond. INSS and other groups of federal employee -- public employees -- public sector employees are on our road map, and we're working systematically through those agreements.

Thanks a lot and congrats again.

And our next question comes from the line of Tito Labarta from Goldman Sachs.

Hi, good evening, everyone. Thank you for the call and taking my question. And also congratulations on the very strong results. My question is on the personal loans, right? We saw a very strong acceleration in the origination this quarter, despite asset quality still deteriorating. I know there's some seasonality there. But just how you think about this going forward? I mean, I think initial signs, you feel comfortable with the asset quality outlook. But is there room to accelerate this product more this year just to think about how that will continue to grow throughout the year and as potentially asset quality may begin to improve?

Hi Tito, thanks for the question. This is Youssef. So yes, with respect to the unsecured personal loan book, as you recall, towards the middle of last year, we decelerated a bit origination. There was a lot more uncertainty at that time around what sort of normalization post-COVID we would see. We didn't have a reference point unlike in credit cards for what pre-COVID looked like, we were pretty cautious. In the time period since then, we've made several improvements in terms of pricing, in terms of models, in terms of the resilience of our originations. And we just accumulated a lot more data, more data on more customers across more products. And so what you see is the combined result of all of those things, whereby we've observed performance of our most recent cohorts to be quite strong and in fact, actually a bit better than what we expected. And so that's given us a lot more confidence to reaccelerate and grow quite a bit in this segment. As an aside, the movement on delinquency rates is completely explained by seasonality. In fact, it's a little bit better than seasonality. So normalized for seasonal pattern, I would say that exceeded our expectations on NPLs alone. And so going forward, all of this gives us quite a bit of confidence to continue to accelerate the growth in that unsecured lending category.

Okay. Great. Thank you, Youssef. That's helpful. If I can ask a follow-up then. So as you continue to accelerate growth both here, I mean, credit cards also had strong growth and you're getting into the payroll lending. You delivered about 11% ROE in the quarter. As you accelerate your loan growth and as David mentioned, right, to really be profitable, you have to be in lending. Is it fair to assume that, that profitability just should, kind of, continue to go up as you grow that loan book, assuming that you manage the asset quality as you've been doing so far?

Tito, this is Lago. Thanks for your question. We do expect that the profitability levels that we have showcased in the last two quarters in Brazil and overall to be at sustainable levels. We don't provide necessarily guidance on where they will be precisely. But if you take a look at our Brazilian operations, we are far from being optimal structure in terms of costs and in terms of leverage. There is still way more room for improvement there, and we continue to invest for the future. We continue to invest in cost and expenses related to the development of new products and features. But if you take a look at the three geos in which we operate, we do expect to have relatively similar levels of returns by leveraging our very advantage cost structure.

Hi, Tito, David here, just adding one more point here. I mean, I think, to be frank, it's not -- it should not really come as a surprise as it's very consistent with the view we've discussed with investors now for over a decade around the efficiency of the business model, the moment that we are able to serve 80 million customers with about 8,000 people from one centralized location at our cost to serve that it's about 20 times more efficient than traditional banks without the banking branches, with the benefits of using a lot of data to underwrite and to cross-sell at effectively no additional customer acquisition cost. All of those factors ultimately just drive into this return of equity that we are finally able to show in more mature operations like Brazil. And this is still in an operation where we're growing 100% year-over-year, and we're still investing a lot for growth in Brazil for 2024, 2025, 2026, investing in a lot of new products and verticals that are still generating several -- will generate several revenues for a while. So we think there is a lot of opportunity ahead to continue driving that return on equity at those levels and potentially up. But it's still very, I would say, is consistent with the way I think we've been all along said that the model itself carries pretty significant cost advantage.

That’s very clear. Thanks, David. Thanks, Lago.

And our next question comes from the line of Daniel [Indiscernible] from Credit Suisse.

Thank you everyone for the opportunity and congratulations on the strong results, these indeed very impressive to see the high profitability in Brazil after reaching a more material level, right? So in Mexico and Colombia, right, we are still see early stages. And it would be very helpful if you could share with us some insights on the 2022 cohorts on ARPAC and asset quality evolution and maybe compared to Brazil and compared the potential to Brazil? And also, if I may, I was curious about Jag's quote on an interview that you should not listen to clients 100%, but to ask the right questions, right, so that determined their pains. So I wanted to know in Mexico versus Brazil, how this has been playing out considering the particular areas among each countries? Thank you.

Hi, Daniel, this is Youssef. So with respect to kind of benchmarking Colombia and Mexico to Brazil, I would break it into three parts. So first of all, just comparing credit cards -- credit card products across the three markets. One of the main differences you see is, both in Mexico and Colombia, consumers tend to use credit cards as not just a means of payment, but also a borrowing vehicle. So you tend to get in the higher rates of revolve, which in turn caused both ARPAC to be higher and NPLs to be higher. But from -- on a return basis, they produce comparable levels of ROA and ROE. The second point that I would make is when we look at our experience so far in the three years since we launched Mexico and 1.5 years or so since we launched Colombia, if anything, we're seeing the Brazil playbook to work very well in both countries and we're actually able to capitalize on all the work that's been done in Brazil, the platforms we've developed and actually execute on a faster basis in both Mexico and Colombia. So we see faster time to market, faster launch of new products and new features and even higher levels of NPS and penetration compared to Brazil at the same point in time. And then the third thing, I'll point out is moving beyond credit card is, as Lago alluded to in his earlier comments, the introduction of the basic account of the Cuenta, which we just started in Mexico, is going to be a game changer, because it's going to allow us to now say yes to offer a product and to say yes to everyone, who applies to Nu. It's going to allow us to gather a lot more data to underwrite better on those customers and it allows us to build a solid local deposit base to be able to grow credit card and other lending products going forward.

Okay, thank you.

And our next question comes from the line of Geoffrey Elliott from Autonomous. Geoffrey, your line is open.

Hello, can you hear me now?

Yes, we can.

Perfect. Thank you. There's been some discussion about changes to the way the credit card market works in Brazil, potentially capping the revolving rates, which I know can be very, very high. What's your take on what comes out of that, if anything?

Geoff, this is Lago. Thanks for your question. Look, the discussions about reviewing the economics of credit card in Brazil have been ongoing for many years involving both the government and many industry participants. And those discussions are not simple because the topic is indeed highly complex. And then it's highly complex in my view for two reasons. Number one, because the credit card is a very big industry in Brazil. It accounts for about 40% of the personal consumption expenditures and over 20% of the GDP of the country. In 2022, the purchase volume of credit cards amounted to over BRL2 trillion. So any disruption to this industry can have major consequences to the consumption in the country. That's number one. Number two, credit card also happens in Brazil to be a very complex industry. As you know, only 25% of the receivables bear in interest versus about 70% in most other countries. And this creates a number of no idiosyncrasies and cross subsidies. And not to mention that the industry also has many, many stakeholders such as merchants, acquirers, networks, issuers and consumers. So a fairly complex puzzle to be cracked. Now we have had the opportunity to engage in very constructive and technical dialogue with the Brazilian government and other industry participants and believe that the Brazilian government has fully comprehended and assimilated the complexities of the credit card industry and the multiple economic levers that exist such as interest rates, interchange rates and interest fee, then you cannot change one thing without also changing the others. So even though it's probably too premature at this point in time to draw any conclusions or expectations as to when and how those discussions will unfold, we are very confident that they will unfold in a matter there is no very balanced and will not put at risk the gains in financial inclusion and competition that have been acquired by the country over the past decade.

And the 40% or -- I think this quarter, 43% ROE in Brazil, clearly, a very impressive number. But do you think that could become problematic in those discussions, sometimes politicians look at returns and think, wow, this is getting really high. Maybe I should do something about that.

I think two comments I would say. So I think first and foremost, the returns that we have here are the result of a very superior cost advantage that we have. I wouldn't say that the returns that we are posting in our operations in Brazil are market level returns, much less they are reflective of our stand-alone credit card operations. That's first comp. The second one is the discussions that we have had with the government have proven to be super technical and constructive. So I would be surprised if anyone would anchor on one or two quarters of returns to contaminate the dialogue.

Great. Thanks very much.

And our next question comes from the line of Pedro Leduc at Itau.

Thank you, guys so much for the call -- question. A little bit on the credit card loan book, you're still growing very fast. If you could help us understand a bit on how much is higher limits or usage per clients and sort of new clients? And perhaps a second question tied to that. An update on anything this quarter that we're already seeing and your effort to move up the higher income clients lay out perhaps some actions that you're taking there? Really to understand a little bit your credit card loan book growth? Thank you.

Hi Pedro, this is Youssef. I would say on the credit card, we're continuing to see, as you pointed out, really strong growth. We're really pleased with the performance of the portfolio overall and also when we look at sort of cohort by cohort at the latest cohorts, both on a return on NPV and NPL basis, they have come at or even slightly better than our expectations. So we remain pleased with the performance of that book and really encouraged by the prospects of growth going forward. And one thing I would point out which is even if credit card is our most mature and oldest product, and we have now about 40% or so of all adults in Brazil as customers, our share of purchase volume credit cards is only 13%. We just crossed 13% in the quarter. And so we see a lot of runway to continue to gain share above and beyond continuing to add customers. And I'll let Jag comment on our efforts on the upmarket segment.

Thank you, Youssef. Pedro, thank you for the question. Let me first provide a little bit of context on generally how we approach the building of products. So we always look at any product -- any new product we're building or any customer segment we're trying to address with a fairly standard approach in formula. First, we want to build a strong relationship with our customers. Second, we want to work to gain principality and a lead position. And third, we monetize. Those things don't necessarily happen in sequence. They can happen in parallel, but that's generally the stack rank of our approach and how we think about it. When it comes to the high income segment focus, particularly on Brazil, we already have, as customers, about six in 10 of those high-income customers in Brazil are already Nubank customers that have a credit card, a bank account and other products with us. And so we already have a great starting point in terms of an established relationship with those customers. In fact, quite recently, Bain just published its most recent PRISM NPS report for Q1. And what that shows is that the segment of customers where we have actually our highest NPS is with the high-income customers. Now that's a segment where many players have a stronger NPS relative to other segments. But our lead in that high-income segment on customer love on NPS is roughly the same. It's in the same ballpark. So we are encouraged that we are establishing credibility and trust with that customer segment. And we're starting to see that in our products, whether it's in the credit card product area or others, where we're getting increasingly confident based on the activity, we're seeing with high-income customers that they're starting to believe and think of Nubank as a bank that they can work with. And so that progress that we are seeing over the last couple of quarters is starting to give us increased confidence that we can address that segment with a full suite of products. Credit card as always is usually our lead product and that's been several years and lots of work on the road map to start to make that happen.

Appreciate it. Thank you.

And our next question comes from the line of Eduardo Rosman at BTG Pactual.

Hi, everyone. Congrats on the numbers. I have a question regarding your underwriting skills, which is also a follow-up to what Jag just explained. Clearly, you are very -- you are doing a very good job, right, since you've been able to grow a lot over a long period of time and also with better asset quality, but that's particularly true on credit cards, right? Here, the way I see you with the best product, particularly for the average Brazilian, do you think that the quality of your products and the high principality that you have with your clients create willingness to pay that could maybe be as important to know as the underwriting skills? And also as a follow-up, right, we're still not seeing the same thing happening on personal loans. We can see, let's say, naturally a very good performance in credit cards, personal loans are still catching up. So do you think that, that is just a matter of time or the product is just different? Thanks.

Hi, Rosman, this is Youssef. Thank you for the question. So let me try to address in turn the points you raised. So I would say like when we look at our experience in credit cards and in unsecured personal loans, we see the methodology, the playbook, the governance process, the data, the tools we've developed to work just as well. Obviously, the personal loans is a lot more recent in its -- since inception than credit cards. But when we compare at the same point in time, we see a relatively similar level of leverage that we get from all those methodologies and process and governance we've developed. And I don't think it's a leap of fate to believe that it would extend to other categories beyond unsecured personal loans in terms of kind of the underwriting advantage it gives us. To your other point on willingness to pay, yes, we do see some evidence that we have a willingness to pay advantage, in particular, when we look at things like principality, customers that we've reached primary bank account relationship status with as Lago was mentioning earlier. And so that has to be a product of a lot of things, some tangible in terms of how we service those customers, some perhaps intangible having to do with brand, having to do with loyalty, having to do with NPS. And I think there's a lot of factors that go into that, but there's confidence that, that phenomenon also exists.

Great. Thanks a lot.

And our next question comes from the line of Mario Pierry from BofA.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Let me ask you a question on funding costs and deposits. I think Lago mentioned that the funding costs should stay around 80% of CDI in the next few quarters. Just wondering if this number shouldn't be lower in the longer term, given that some of the incumbent banks have funding costs of like 65% of CDI. What -- if your strategy in remunerating deposits would change in a lower rate environment because before, right, historically, you're remunerating clients at 100% of CDI. So I don't know the reason why you think that 80% is the right number. Does it mean that you'll be willing to remunerate clients higher if rates come down? And then when I look -- you talk about your deposit base staying stable in the quarter. There's some seasonality in the fourth quarter, which we do agree on. But when I look at your deposit per client, it has been trending down. So I don't know if that is a function of the change in remuneration? What do you think explains the lower balance for clients? Thank you.

Hi, Mario, this is Lago. Thanks for your question. Let me try to take them in turn as well. So first, with respect to the cost of funding, we do expect that for the coming quarters, the cost of funding will remain at around 80% of CDI. It is -- we can be super precise on this because it largely depends on customer behavior. And we don't offer 80% of CDI per se. We basically offer combination of products, which is composed by the Money Box and the demand deposits that compounding with the customer behavior that we have observed results in and around 80% of CDI. We do expect this to remain as such. And usually in the fourth quarter of each year, there is a slight drop in the cost of funding because there is now a seasonally high inflow of deposits as we observed in the fourth quarter of 2022, so too, we expect to observe in the fourth quarter of 2023. But by and large, it should remain at about 80% of CDI throughout the next four quarters. We do believe that there is the opportunity for us to continuously reassess and reflect on the value proposition that we are offering to our customers with respect to their savings and investments. At this point in time, we do not have any short-term plans to actually change those features that will lead us to lower funding costs, although we do appreciate that there is a value lever there. If and when we find a value proposition that will be actually be net positive to our customers, we should certainly entertain. But you should not expect any material change to the funding cost over the next four quarters. So I think that's the first part. The second part, we did see kind of a slight drop. I want to say of about 5% or 6% in deposits per customer in the first quarter of 2023, that is largely seasonal based on what we have seen. In fact, if you look at the Brazilian market, the demand deposits of the whole system during the first quarter of 2023 dropped by about 10%. so the average demand deposit per customer of Nubank dropping by about 5%, 6%, in fact, we gained some shares. And what we have seen post the end of the first quarter of 2023, it continues -- deposits continue to behave as expected. And we do not see, as we mentioned in the prior call, any relevant impact to our inflows or outflows as a result of our having changed the remuneration of the content introduction of Money Box in the third quarter of 2022.

Great, Lago. Just briefly then stay on deposits. If you can talk about the duration of the deposits and how you could change this going forward, especially as you go into longer-term products such as payroll loans?

No, absolutely. That is a great question. And we do expect to continue to increase the average duration of our deposits as we decrease the average duration of our credit assets. That will be largely tied to the ramp-up of our payroll loan book, and we can do so primarily through the offering of time deposits to our own retail customers.

Okay, thank you very much.

Thank you, Mario.

And our next question comes from the line of Rafael Frade from Citi.

Hi, guys. Good evening. Congrats on the results. I have a follow-up on your credit card book. So you had a huge increase in the receivables paying interest, right? And this was a relevant portion of the increasing the profitability of the quarter. So I just would like to understand a little more about the initiatives that you have been taking to increase, right, the receivables with interest in this portfolio? And if you think that we are close to a level that should be sustainable, some more room to go. So just trying to understand what's going on in July? Thanks.

Yes, absolutely, that is a great question. And in fact, I would try to draw your attention to page 16, in which we provide the breakdown of exactly what you said, the interest earning portfolio within the credit card. And as you can observe, the non-revolving interest-earning portion of our credit card book has grown from about 8% of the total book to 16% of the total book in a year. So a fairly no relevant increase, and we are very pleased with that performance. What is the source of that performance? I think we are basically managing to develop new financing products and features through, which customers can actually now gain financing capabilities through their credit cards, mostly related to PIX financing and Boleto financing. So those two features now account for the vast majority of this increase. And what I would highlight as well, if you also look at the interest-earning portfolio, is that while our nonrevolving interest earning portfolio went from 8% to 16%, the revolving part remained largely flat. And what we have learned over the past four, five quarters is that those additional financing features has resulted in no incremental credit risk to our book, which is, I think, in a very pleasing output for us.

Thank you, Lago. Just to understand here, what I think that's very curious is that when I look for the interest rates on credit cards, they are close to 9%, if I'm not wrong, according to Brazil Central Bank, while the personal loans have a lower rate. So I'm curious why a client is taking credit card installments instead of personal loans? And maybe part of the question you already answered because it's products that probably are not available on personal loans, right? So just to understand why the client is financing through that?

Yes, I think it's important to note that the interest rates of those financing features within credit cards, what I'm calling PIX financing or Boleto financing, are closer to 5% to 6% per month, so much more in line with unsecured personal loans.

Okay, that’s perfect. Thank you.

No, thank you.

And our next question comes from the line of Gustavo Schroden at Bradesco.

Hi, good evening, everybody. Thanks for the opportunity and then congrats on the strong results. I'd like to switch out the discussions to the operating expenses or the cost side, I mean, which costed a lot about the revenue generation. And indeed, the main beat versus our numbers here was on the operating expenses. And I'd like to understand, because we finalized the evolution of especially the non-revenue-linked expenses, I'm talking about SG&A and marketing expenses, we could see a nominal decrease year-on-year and also quarter-on-quarter despite the fact that the bank is growing very fast in -- over the core. So my question is it is sustainable to keep or to continue decreasing the non-revenue linked expenses in the coming quarters? Or this was some adjustment that the bank did in the quarter, especially on, as I said, SG&A marketing expenses, it draws our attention in this quarter, and I think it is very important to understand the investment thesis? Thank you.

No, absolutely, Gustavo, this is Lago. Thanks for your question. I would -- for those who have not yet seen, I would draw your attention to explanatory note number eight of our financial statements that probably bring a very detailed breakdown of those operating expenses. But I think if you look at those statements, you will realize that within operating expenses, which grew by only 12% over the period, you largely have two items. You have customer support and operations, which over the past 12 months, grew by 75%, and you have G&A, which basically stayed flat over the past 12 months. And within G&A, if you -- the main things there are payroll and share-based compensation. And Gustavo, to your point, there are a few things there are non-recurring and a few things there are recurring. Let me try to break them down. One of the main impacts of the largely flat or decrease in G&A is the cancellation of the contingent share award, or CSA, that took place in the second-half of 2022. There was something that basically caused the company something about $70 million to $75 million per year, the elimination of which brings us no relevant savings. That level of saving, of course, is non-recurring. It happened from 2022 to 2023. We do not expect to see those deltas coming through over the coming years, but we do expect to continue to see the elimination of the CSA, right? Just to be clear, we're going to have no further expense with CSA over the coming years. The second level is that we basically capped headcount largely flat, if not slightly down over the past six to 12 months. And that part, I think, is recurring. If you take a look at our overall cost base, between 50% to 60% of our cost base is payroll related and about 20% is technology related. We do expect that we will grow over the course of the next 18 months the headcount at a fraction of the velocity at which we grew headcount over the past 18 months. And is that sustainable? We believe this is sustainable, especially with the adoption of best-in-class processes and technologies that will materially increase the efficiency and productivity of the company overall, as we have seen over the past 12 to 24-month period.

Okay, okay. Very clear. Just a follow-up here, Lago. It's very clear on the G&A expenses and about the marketing expenses. It's also -- I mean, draw our attention, $19 million the first Q this year, that was much higher, for example, last year in the last quarter. It is also -- I mean, should we continue to see the bank with this lower level of marketing expenses? And also, just -- I mean, it's a soft guidance that I'm asking here regarding the percentage of total operating expenses versus the total revenue. This quarter was a 25%. Do you think that it is, I mean, a reasonable level or that should increase to something that as we saw in the past?

So Gustavo, on marketing expenses, I think they are a relatively small portion of our operating expenses, and they have been since the inception of the company. Most of our customer acquisition happens through MGM. So we have historically had a relatively low investment in marketing. But the 2022 numbers have also been maybe potentially inflated by the investments that we made in the World Cup, which we do not expect to see in 2023. So you should expect to see marketing being between 5% to 7% of our total operating expenses, as was the case in 2022 and as we expect to be the case in 2023. We don't think that the levels that we have landed in overall efficiency ratio are non-sustainable. In fact, we think that we are nowhere near the efficiency frontier. There is more efficiency to be achieved over the course of the coming quarters.

Alright, perfect. Thank you.

And our next question comes from the line of Neha Agarwala from HSBC.

Hi, thank you for taking my question. Mostly follow-ups on the questions previously asked. So first, on the cost. So the cost to income right now is about 36%. Do you see a room for reducing it further in the short-term? Or this is a good level at which you could operate? And should we -- should this increase maybe as you get your licenses in Mexico -- in Colombia, you launched more products in Mexico, should we see tax to income increase as the Nu geos may require more investments upfront and monetization is going to come with a lag? And my second question is on the high-income segment. Your comments about having the highest NPS in the high-income segment. Was a bit surprising because there are not a lot of products to offer for the high-income segment. So what are we missing here? What are the main things which are allowing you to capture the high-income segment in your view? Is it the ultraviolet card? Is it some other offerings that you have or just the experience? Because I would imagine the requirements for the high-income segment are much more broader, they require many more products, more personal attention. So if you can shed some light on that, that would be great. Thank you so much.

Great, Neha. let me try to take your first question on efficiency and then I'll ask Jag to help you with -- with your cash question on high income. So on efficiency, we as you said, reached a level of 39% on a combined basis. And if you take a look on page seven of the earnings presentation of 37% in Brazil only. So Brazil is not surprisingly more efficient than the consolidated basis. And we do expect that there is room for additional efficiency to be achieved in both Brazil and a consolidated basis. We don't expect that 37% in Brazil or 39% at the holding company is really kind of the best-in-class that we can achieve. In fact, a lot of cost and expenses that we are incurring in Brazil and certainly in Mexico and Colombia, our cost and expenses related to products or features that are not yet generating any revenues. And once they start to generate revenues, they should continue to contribute to efficiency ratio. And in that lines, yes, I think Mexico and Colombia, we'll have to increase its operations once they become fully regulated. In fact, Mexico has already become fully regulated, and Colombia is expected to be fully regulated by the end of this year, and we are preparing all of our sources accordingly. But I believe that the additional revenues that you're going to have in those countries will more than offset the additional cost and expenses that will have to be invested there in a manner that will not be detrimental to the overall efficiency ratio of the company. But that was the first question. I know that you also had a question on high income. Jag, would you share some thoughts there?

Yes, happy to. Thank you, Lago. Great question. And let me try to address it in a couple of steps. First of all, what we have found is that when we offer products targeted at the high-income segment and as we optimize those, we certainly see improvements in NPS as we measure them product-by-product from that high-income segment. We have seen that with our ultra view that’s credit card. We will expect to see that in the future as we launch more products targeted at that segment. We've actually talked today about, for example, the consignado product for federal employees, which actually also tends to skew high income. So we'd expect that trend to continue as we go forward. The NPS measurements that we see today, however, are also related to the fact that our core products whether it's our core [Indiscernible] credit card product or bank account product have features and ease of use and simplicity, transparency of pricing, all of these key pieces of our value proposition that resonate with high-income customers as well as the mass market. And so that, combined with the investments we've always made historically in customer experience and customer service, are what's leading to our NPS position with the high-income customers just as it's leading to our NPS position with other segments. As we increasingly focus our product development efforts to build products designed specifically for high-income customers, we expect NPS with them and our traction and principality with them to further increase, but it's still relatively early days of those dedicated efforts on our part.

And our next question comes from the line of Domingos Falavina from JPMorgan.

Hello, guys. Thank you for taking the question as well. First, congrats on the trends very surprising costs and top line. But my question, I guess, just to shift a little bit more into Mexico -- when I look at the operation in Mexico, we see basically loan -- I mean ballpark number is stabilizing, right, around $650 million and -- $630 million to $640 million actually. And you didn't grow in the last month January, February, but provisions actually did come kind of similar basis before $20 million. So I guess my question is, are you doing the same kind of provisioning levels in Mexico for expected losses in which case growth should be the main driver for that expense? So that's kind of the first kind of more accounting question. And the second one is what's your thinking process in Mexico? You plan on holding this stable for how long, what's the average duration of that portfolio to learn from that vintage before we're accelerating? Thank you.

Dom, thank you so much for the question. So I think Mexico, we launched Mexico just a step back slightly less than three years ago. And Mexico has already achieved over 3.2 million, 3.3 million customers. So it has had a phenomenal growth. Last year, we became the number one issuer of credit card in the country. And basically, Mexico is beating Brazil across every single KPI that we have. We did grow credit cards and we did kind of see a fairly steep growth in customers over the coming -- over the last weeks, primarily after the launch of Cuenta Nu, as we mentioned in this call, that reach over 500,000 customers. So we are super pleased with what we find in Mexico so far. Now with respect to provisioning, number one, you will only see the expected credit loss provisioning in the consolidated books that we do. In the local books, you will see just Mexican GAAP. You will not see the same IFRS expected credit loss provisioning that you will see. The second one is that once you look at the NPL ratios that you have in Mexico, as we are we usually present our results in terms of delinquency at 60-plus NPLs, whereas the banking industry in the country usually presents this is 90-plus. So not entirely an apples-to-apples comparison. Now I think the underlying question may be what is the unit economics of the credit card in Mexico? What is the overall credit losses in Mexico? And how do we expect this portfolio to behave and to unfold over the coming quarters? We do not expect the Mexico delinquency levels to be at par with Brazil, especially in the early days of the ramp-up of this business for a few reasons. Number one, once we…

Very clear, Lago. But just like as we follow the monthly data in there, usually, you will assume what about six months or more or less stable loan book and then you'll reaccelerate. If you were to get on your expense in or something.

Sorry. Can you repeat the question, Dom?

Yes. No, just like if you were to base your experience as in Brazil, as we look at this monthly data, you would expect like about a quarter or six months or a year of more stable loan growth. I guess my question is how long do you have to see that portfolio behavior before you get ready to confident again?

No, we will be resuming growth in credit cards in Mexico throughout the second quarter and throughout the third quarter of the year. We have, by no means, no slowdown in Mexico, and we expect to continue to increase our product penetration in the country.

Very clear. Thank you.

And our next question comes from the line of Craig Maurer from FT Partners. Craig, your line is open.

Sorry about that. Thanks for taking the question. To follow-up on an earlier -- the earlier questions on pursuing more high-end consumers. The question is, to what degree do you think your customer base now and then in the medium term will overlap with small business owners in Brazil? And how can you expand your product offerings to cross over into the small business market?

Hi, Craig, David here. Thank you for the question. So we actually have already a very significant base of small business owners. We have over 2.3 million SMEs in our base. And it's actually very much related to what you were saying. A lot of the small business owners ends up being internally as high income. We initially went to small business owners because our consumers where we started would tell us that it was -- they were getting really, really bad service by traditional institutions in Brazil. So we saw an opportunity there and start cross-selling the small business product to them. These are the business that has a lot of potential. We probably haven't given it as much focus as we should, but we see significant growth ahead. We have still a very reduced product portfolio where we have a savings account, a detailed account, and we're starting to roll out a credit card product for small business owners. And we see really significant -- really great product market fit. We've launched around also payments receiving. So overall, very excited about the opportunity there.

Okay. Thank you for the answer.

And this concludes the Q&A session of the call. I would like to thank you all for participating in this session today and learn more about our path of growth and profitability. I will welcome you to access our Investor Relations website and follow-up with us if there are any pending points. Thank you very much for being with us today.

The Nu Holdings conference call has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.