Greetings and welcome to Nutrien's 2020 Second Quarter Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Richard Downey, VP of Investor Relations.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Nutrien's conference call to discuss our second quarter 2020 results and outlook. On the phone with us today is Mr. Chuck Magro, President and CEO of Nutrien; Mr. Pedro Farah, our CFO; and the heads of our three business units. As we conduct this conference call, various statements that we make about future expectations, plans and prospects contain forward-looking information. Certain material assumptions were applied in making these conclusions and forecasts. Therefore, actual results could differ materially from those contained in our forward-looking information. Additional information about these factors and assumptions are contained in our current quarterly report to our shareholders as well as our most recent annual report, MD&A and annual information form filed with Canadian and U.S. Securities Commissions to which we direct you. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Chuck Magro.

Thanks, Richard, and good morning everyone. Nutrien's second quarter results demonstrates the strength of our business even during these unprecedented times. The bottom-line is that food is essential and there is no company better positioned to help farmers meet the growth in global demand. Our adjusted EBITDA was over $1.7 billion this quarter and we demonstrated a significant progress on our strategic and operating objectives. We were able to produce these results despite cyclical weakness in fertilizer prices and global economic uncertainty. In fact, Nutrien's second quarter EBITDA was higher than the combined total of the next four largest crop nutrient companies. We also generated 1.6 billion in free cash flow this quarter aided by strong working capital management. I take three things away from our results today. First, the strength in performance of our Retail Ag Solutions business and the benefits of our growth strategy. We generated nearly $1 billion in EBITDA in the first half of the year primarily due to the strong organic growth and significantly higher margins. We also had tremendous uptick of our digital platform as we continued to build out. Second, we achieved excellent operational results in our potash and nitrogen business units, with strong on stream times and lower production costs, demonstrating that we generate strong cash flows, even at the bottom of the cycle. And third, the fundamentals of the commodity markets are improving, including the agricultural markets. There are signs that fertilizer and most crop prices have stabilized and are beginning to recover and the outlook into 2021 is now more positive. Let's shift to our results for the quarter and the first half. In the first half of 2020, our Retail Ag Solutions business delivered impressive EBITDA growth of 20% compared to last year, despite lower than expected U.S. seeded…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of PJ Juvekar from Citi. Your line is open.

This is Kendall Marthaler on for PJ. So just looking at retail, so during the first quarter results you noted that you wanted retail inventories pretty low. You expected they would be low, so you could restock going into the fall. So just given very strong sales and retail in the first half, can you provide a little bit more detail on the inventory situation there specifically within crop nutrients and crop protection? And would you say they're lower than normal or just about in line with what you were expecting?

Good morning, Kendall. Yes. I’ll have Mike Frank answer the question specific to retail.

Yes, Kendall. So our inventories across our network globally are lower in crop protection and in crop nutrients, in particular in North America. We did come out of a season with strong sales, as you saw from the report today and overall lower inventory. So we did achieve the operational metrics that we were looking for. And in fact, if you look at our overall working capital metric, we're down to about 18% in our working capital ratio, which is really strong performance for us. And so we're, if anything, we're probably a little bit ahead of expectations.

And just more broadly speaking, Kendall, what I would say is, across our ag value chain, so including the wholesale businesses, generally speaking after 2019, we and the industry had a significant amount of fertilizer inventory because of the poor application seasons we saw last spring and last fall. We're feeling very good. It's part of the reason why we're more constructive for the second half. And as we move into 2021, that most of that inventory now has normalized and in fact, in some parts of the ag value chain as Mike has alluded to it's quite thin in terms of our inventory position. And as I mentioned, looking at our order book on a forward basis, our order book is quite full right through the third quarter now.

Your next question comes from the line of Ben Isaacson from Scotiabank. Your line is open.

Nice job on the quarter. Chuck, you guys have spent billions of dollars on a physical retail infrastructure, obviously, including your tuck-in strategy. You've now I realized, I think 45% of North American retail sales available were made on the digital platform as that continues to succeed. Just working out backwards if you're realizing $0.55 to $0.60 on the historical dollar from the physical infrastructure, it is that the most efficient use of capital going forward, is there shareholder value that can be unlocked by consolidating or thinning out the brick and mortar business model in retail? Thank you.

Good morning, Ben. So look, we've always said that the digital strategy is integrated, we call it an omni-channel with the physical distribution network. In fact, we couldn't deliver the great results on the digital platform without the several thousand agronomists that work inside of Nutrien and with farmers on a day-to-day basis and of course, the physical facilities to move the product. Agriculture is one of these very unique industries where when the season is open and farmers are ready to go to work we need to get product, people and our assets on the farm in a short order in a matter of hours. So we think that the work that we've done on the digital platform is fantastic. We do believe that we're going to change how and what we can offer farmers and make farmers more profitable, help them manage their farms, as well as help them kind of maneuver the sustainability world. And that's a big, big part of our investment. But we do think that it goes hand in glove with our physical network. In fact, we're very confident we've seen other players in this industry just have a digital platform and not have the physical infrastructure and they just cannot be successful given the demands that are pressed, when we're in the heat of the season and the requirements that our customers need.

Your next question comes from the line of Steve Byrne from Bank of America. Your line is open.

As you noted, the urea prices are really ripped in the last couple of weeks. And if we look into the U.S. Midwest pricing, the urea on a per unit nitrogen basis relative to UAN and ammonia is at a real premium. The UAN and ammonia pricing there is -- nearly multi-year lows. So curious to hear what your view is for where did that disconnect go from here? Do you think that that disconnect narrows because the urea pricing is potentially unsustainable or that you're thinking the UAN and ammonia pricing could rally from here, which of those scenarios is likely getting reflected in your guidance.

Good morning, Steve. I will have Jason Newton to talk about the dynamics between urea, ammonia and UAN what we're seeing. And then I can address the guidance question at the end. Go ahead, Jason.

Yes. Good morning, Steve. Yes, typically, what you see especially at this time of year is that the urea market is being driven by dynamics, offshore and in particular, really robust demand that we're seeing from India and to-date, a little bit of the inability for Chinese suppliers to get in on those tenders. And so, we've seen a tight global urea market and prices moving up in response and typically historically, you don't see the other product prices ammonia and UAN moving in tandem unless you're in season. So, the spreads fluctuate because urea price is volatile. As we get closer to product actually being applied, you'd expect that those end market prices of ammonia and UAN will move to be more in line with historical levels relative to urea. And I think you've already seen some of the sentiment turn a bit more positive toward the other products because of the strength in the urea market.

Yes. Just to put that together now with our guidance and how we're thinking about it. So, look, we think that that the crop maturity is quite advanced right now for this time of the year. We are expecting an early harvest and a nice application window for a fall application. So from a demand perspective and that's clearly what our order book is showing right now, is that we're expecting solid demand. I say this is a general comment not only for nitrogen but potash and phosphate, which is helpful. And the reason we trimmed our guidance in nitrogen was purely just on the ammonia and UAN. We just don't think that there's going to be because of the economic slowdown and the hit to the industrial demand for nitrogen products. We just don't think that there's going to be as much forward momentum when it comes to pricing. But we do think that that urea certainly is strong and there's reasons for that the supply demand is quite tight as Jason's articulated. And when you look at the bottom-end of our range, what we need is a weather event, so a very shortened application season. And we're not calling for that today but that would be the bottom of the range. And on the top and of course, is a nice wide application season and a little bit of forward momentum when it comes to recovery and some nitrogen prices but not a lot. We don't really need a lot to hit the top end.

Your next question comes from the line of Jacob Bout from CIBC. Your line is open.

My question is on retail margins. So solid improvement, we look at a year end [audio gap] improve margins further.

Good morning, Jacob. Mike Frank, will you take that question?

Sure. So, Jacob, look, our first half was really about driving operational excellence and focused on organic growth and EBITDA margins and we executed against that strategy. Our stronger margins are partly a result of mix and so, for example in crop protection, we saw a really strong market for trees and in both corn and soybeans and there's solid margins on those products. Obviously in crop nutrients, prices were off. But if you saw in North America, we pretty much were able to hold our per ton margins. And so our teams just did a really good job of selling the value of the products. And that's your margins. I would say lastly, on the seed side, our seed revenues are about flat, we actually walked away from some of our wholesale seed business, which impacted revenue in a market where there was more planted acres, but it strengthened our margins. And so we just executed across each one of our platforms. And we think that these margins are sustainable. Obviously, the digital platform is giving us more insights and helping us work with our customers to make better agronomic decisions. And it's also simplifying and making the entire purchase process to more efficient and that's also driving some margin efficiency for us. So it's a number of pieces that came together. But Jacob, we think these are sustainable. In fact, we think there's a runway of opportunity ahead to continue to drive both organic growth and EBITDA margins.

Yes. And Jacob just one further point. We also think there's some further upside in margin simply because we're still integrating the Ruralco acquisition. That was a large acquisition for us. It was a public company. And we laid out the synergy targets that are going to take a couple of years to accomplish. So as the rest of the synergies are delivered, we do think that I'll have some upward potential for overall margins because it was such a large acquisition. So we like what we see I think Mike and the leadership team of the retail group have done a great job. And there is some upside as we further integrate the Ruralco acquisition into the overall company.

Your next question comes from the line of Joel Jackson from BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open.

I did want to follow up on some of the commentary on seed and seed margins. It was a, I think, a more competitive dynamic in seeds this year especially in soybeans and I think you mentioned your margins were up. And there's also a bit of now, uncertainty around what will happen with the [indiscernible] use. So I guess the value of extend if we don't get new registrations later this year, for next year. So what I need, it's a two part question. How is the seed price dynamics evolving? Do you see a more competitive market and how might that pressure or not pressure margins? And then what is sort of your plans for some of the uncertainty around extend and as enlist is ramping up? Thanks.

Good morning, Joel. Mike Frank, will you take those questions, please?

Yes, you bet. So Joe good questions. Look, I think if we just kind of look across the seed industry, if you start with corn, what we saw on unit pricing in our retail businesses that prices were up just a bit about $3 a unit, so less than 1% price appreciation. So it's a competitive market, we didn't see a big shift in trade mix. And so, the corn market seems pretty stable, margins are relatively stable as well. And as I just mentioned, previously, we walked away from some wholesale business both in corn seed but as well as in soybean seed. Then more specific to the soy market. It's extremely dynamic, obviously with the legal issues on dicamba that, we were faced with at the end of the application window, those were challenges but in the end, we were able to get dicamba on most of the acres that that farmers wanted to get it down on. Our pricing on soybeans seed was really flat. In fact, there was no appreciation or depreciation on selling price. Early in the season, there was some really aggressive pricing, we for the most part stayed out of that. And then the market came back and overall again, we saw a pretty flat pricing and on the retail side similar to flat margins on soybean. Now, going into '21 obviously, there's a question on whether or not extend is going to be reregistered and so we're working closely with our suppliers bear BASF, Corteva, won't be prepared to sell whatever the farmer ends up wanting. We expect that we're going to sell both extending on this seed next year. The real question is, whether or not there's going to be registration to allow us to apply dicamba over the top. So I think we're going to continue to see strengthening of the Enlist platform. We think it'll be this year was about 20% of our mix next year we think it'll be north of 30. So, there's definitely some momentum with Enlist right now. But again, we're kind of sitting back and waiting to see both from a legal standpoint and a regulatory standpoint, what tools that our customers can use and we'll have the available seed to sell them regardless of how these regulatory decisions get made.

Your next question comes from the line of Adam Samuelson from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

So, the question is as on the potash market and I would love to just get your views on China as we think about the second half of the year and into next, Chuck, in your prepared remarks, I think areas of strength in the potash market China was notably absent from that list. And just reflect on kind of how the contract evolved the spring port inventories and how you think the utility of a China contract kind of works going forward given the experience both this year and last couple.

Okay, good morning, Adam. So look, yes, the market fundamentals for potash as we said, very good first half. Demand was strong. We're seeing brisk movement. I mentioned already a couple of times our order book, and the markets I did call out for strength were Brazil and Southeast Asia and India. And we are holding our overall market demand forecast to 65 million to 67 million tons in 2020. Certainly we think that in 2021, the market will grow again. Specific to your question on China. We do think that shipments to China in 2020 will be down. And that's built into our overall forecast in the numbers we provided. It's clear that they drew down their inventories. They tap their strategic reserves to gain leverage in the last contract. And they won't be able to do that again this year, unless those shipments are significantly higher than what we predict. So I'm not really overly concerned about the port inventories. I think there's some gamesmanship happening here. And we view overall inventories in China, so just not just the port but in country to be actually reasonably tight because the fundamental demand for potash in China, we think grew year-over-year. So we're feeling very good about the overall potash market China included, if we can get to a point here, where we continue to see solid demand in 2020? I think it sets up for another growth and good year in 2021.

Your next question comes from the line of Duffy Fischer from Barclays. Your line is open.

Two questions. First one is, just there's been a couple of news articles about COVID, maybe hindering the overall ability to pull in the crop this year and to prep for next year. So just with all your touch points in the field, do you think COVID will be an issue this fall on kind of a macro basis for North America? And then, the bigger question is, we're about a decade into the push into digital. It was about maybe seven years ago or so the climate forecast, which is when I think it came to investors minds how big this might be. Originally, people thought it was going to be revolutionary. You might have one winner, obviously none of that has really played out if anything, it's evolutionary to kind of non-existent, with what we see from the outside as analysts looking at the numbers for the company. So, one, what's gone wrong with digital or what didn't happen over the last five to seven years that was supposed to? Two, can we crack those nuts going forward and do you see digital becoming kind of revolutionary, can it really move the needle at some point or will it continue just to be evolutionary in your mind?

Good morning, Duffy. What I'll do is, I'll have Mike Frank give a perspective because he's closest to the farmer on COVID in the harvest. Mike, please, feel free to comment on your views on digital and then I can come back to that as well.

Yes, you bet. So, definitely, look, I wouldn't anticipate any issues getting the harvest off. I mean, if you think back to kind of the middle of March when COVID the pandemic in the concerns were really ramping up. That obviously was right in the busy time of farmers in North America getting the crop planted. And, firstly, our employees on the frontline, they didn't lose a beat, every day they came to work and they focused on making sure they were safe and the customers were safe and very importantly making sure that our customers were making the right decisions. And so, I think it's going to be the same thing as the crop comes out. Farmers will get in the field they'll harvest grain elevators will operate. And I wouldn't anticipate, any material issues from a COVID standpoint. Now look, good question on digital, revolutionary versus evolutionary. Look, our focus on digital has been very pragmatic. And it's really about what we can do as a retailer based on the breadth we have and the focus and the value that we add in the value chain, so we're using our tools, our digital tools to help our agronomists and our customers make better agronomy decisions. And we're doing that with seed. We're doing it with fertilizer, variable rate applications. And I would say that those two tools are working extremely well and are adding value to our customers and to our business. We're also now using our digital platform to help our customers plan ahead. And so doing complete crop plans across their entire farm, input by input ultimately creating a business plan, and then being able to execute that business plan, even as the season plays out. And all of this being done digitally, ultimately streamlines the…

Duffy, just a few other comments to augment what Mike has said is, look, we don't really think about it in those terms. What we do know though being so close to the customer as an independent advisor is that the relationship matters. And we don't expect ever that the digital platform or portal is going to replace that. This is a business that that has for generations has been built on relationships and we want to build on top of that. And what we're trying to do, our approach is very different than what you outlined in some of the companies that have tried to do this and probably got less results than they had hoped. We're really letting our customers guide us. We're not building these things and then expecting them to come and use it. And then of course, pay for it. That the seeds selector tool that Mike just outlined, that was built because growers can't find a platform where they can get all the seed varieties in an unbiased view and as a company that is independent and we sell it all. That should be our role. And we do that with our agronomist today. But now we're going to put not only our agronomist but we're going to have the tool that help growers make these very complex decisions. So, we are excited about this. And we think over time, there's going to be tremendous value created for farmers and for our shareholders. But this is an evolution in my humble view this will not be a revolution.

Your next question comes from the line of Andrew Wong from RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

So I just want to ask about just geopolitical risks as potash I mean, on the upside or the downside. Belarus just had a pretty contentious election, Canada's relations with the U.S. and China have pretty strained; Russia's relations are strained with pretty much many countries. So is there anything we should be watching there in terms of impacts on the posh market potential tariffs, potential sanctions, anything like that? Thanks.

Good morning, Andrew. Yes. Look, so we are in a world where I don't think we've seen as many geopolitical risks as we've seen over the last two to three years, across the world in multiple industries. So I can't sit here and say, don't worry about it. But what I can say is, look, we're pretty well connected and plugged into, at least, the jurisdictions where we either [Audio Gap].

[Audio Gap] and maybe last night, this is just building on what Chuck mentioned here a minute ago. Our digital platform doesn't stand alone, and if it did, it wouldn't offer a lot of value. It would be the combination of our digital platform, the relationships that we have with our customers and the reach that we have and our physical assets. And it's these three pillars together that really create the leverage opportunity that we believe we have uniquely in digital because of our relationships and because of the extensive physical assets that we have. And so, I really believe that's why we're able to leverage our digital tools to create real value for our customers and for our retail business.

Your next question comes from the line of John Roberts from UBS. Your line is open.

This is Lucas Beaumont in for John. So just wanted to touch on your retail acquisition pipeline. So now that you've had a few more months experience with the current disruptions, what are your expectations now to be able to complete bolt-ons in North America in the second half? Given that's traditionally like your high period of activity? Are you expecting things to be lower this year given like ongoing challenges with due diligence, if that occurs, would we be likely to see high deal activity in the first half of next year or would that basically push everything back 12 months? Could you also please discuss how your smaller retail competitors are faring currently, they are sort of healthy or struggling and how this is impacting potential opportunities.

Okay, good morning, Lucas. Mike Frank, over to you.

Yes. So Lucas, obviously we made a couple of nice acquisitions in Brazil, I would call them medium sized acquisitions. We see more opportunity to continue to do that in Brazil. So I would expect will continue to have opportunity in that market, just like we've seen here over the past several months. In North America, the pipeline has slowed down a bit. We talked about this after our last call, partly because of COVID. It makes the entire process more challenging. And so we've seen that play out, I think, some companies that maybe would have thought about exiting at this time are probably slowing down their plans a bit. So, I do think that'll impact our deal flow a little bit, coming out of 2020 that likely builds opportunity for 2021, just as you mentioned. Now, in terms of how our other retailers doing, obviously, we're still looking at probably a dozen or so deals right now in North America. So we get to see the income statement and balance sheet from a lot of smaller players. And I would say, it continues to be tough. I mean, there's a lot of value in scale. And you need capital to continue to upgrade both your physical assets and turning into your people and we've seen that companies that are subscale are challenge because of that. And so I think that needs to play out, which in my mind means that we'll continue to see consolidation across the retail industry for the next several years ahead.

Your next question comes from the line of Vincent Andrews from Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Just to kind of a follow up question on the seed advisor platform recommendation platform, curious if you know, your customer base in North America broadly. Does it match with the market shares of the large seed companies or are you over shared with the seed companies that you would -- with growers that use the seed companies that you sell or versus Pioneer which you don't sell. And I guess what I'm getting at is with the seed advisor if that advisor makes a recommendation that the farmer should be using hypothetically 100% Pioneer, and they were using 100% something else, presumably you would lose that seed sale because they're not going to be buying seeds from you. So I'm just wondering if part of the -- the idea of the seed advisor and being unbiased is to drive more growers into your overall network and not just sell them seeds, but maybe sell them with all the other inputs that they need. And I'm just curious how this all works.

Good morning, Vincent. Mike Frank?

Yes, Vincent, good question. A little bit detailed, but here's what I would say. So, we have a very broad portfolio of seeds that we sell. We've got our own Dyna-Gro brand where we have seeds in corn, soy, cotton. We sell DeKalb/Asgrow. We sell Syngenta seeds and we do sell Corteva, Pioneer brand in the southern half of the U.S. We've actually acquired some Pioneer dealers in the Midwest, so we do sell Pioneer in select areas in the Midwest as well. And then of course, Corteva now has a new retail brand called Brevant, which they're providing us, new germplasm to sell through our platform as well. So our seed advisor tool will present to our customers, those seeds that we have the portfolio where we can execute the sales. So, if it's an area where we're not selling Pioneer or another regional seed company, we won't be recommending those tools because we can't execute on the sale. But again, as a retailer, there is no retail company that has a broader seed portfolio than we do. And that's one of the benefits that we can, take to our customers is that we sell seed from a variety of seed breeding companies. And again, those varieties and hybrids that we have available, those are the varieties and hybrids that will show in our seed selection tools, so that our customers can make the best decision on those products that we can offer them.

Your next question comes from a line of Chris Parkinson from Credit Suisse. Your line is open.

Can you talk a little bit more about your nitrogen asset portfolio, how we should be thinking about your TNT production over time, including gas contracts, your appetite for additional brownfield and debottlenecks and even M&A within the North American or global market. Thank you very much.

Good morning, Chris. So I have Raef Sully just talk a little bit about the current portfolio platform in the brownfield projects that we've got underway and then I can add to the larger strategic question. Go ahead Raef.

Thanks, Chuck. So look, as you know, our plants are located in three different regions. We've got about a third of our production in Canada, on [Ako Gas] [ph], it's traditionally been a lower price in Henry hub. We've seen that get close a little bit, but it's still very, very good cost gas. We've got a little over a third of our production sitting in the U.S. in Henry Hub and the remainder, bit less than a third is in Trinidad. You will have seen that we took a plant down in May, another one in June, just based on market conditions. The world's changed a little bit in the last six months, we've seen trends that go from a second or third quartile to a third or fourth quartile as the [indiscernible] LNG is pushed down prices across the globe, particularly in Europe. Those plants in Trinidad probably stayed down until we see market conditions improve. What we have been focusing on is brownfields. Chuck mentioned towards -- we're coming close to being able to put online -- close to a million tons more in North America. Some of that has helped us in this quarter with our record productions. We'd like to continue that where it makes economic sense that'll be our focus. Chuck, I don't know, if you want to add to that.

And then, Chris just the broader strategic comments. So we like the nitrogen business in our top three producer globally. I think we're a strong operator. As Raef mentioned, we've got a good gas position. And if you look at some of our margins, there's some of the highest in the world based on how we operate our networks. I think the industry itself, it's the most, as you probably know, it's the most fragmented industry that we certainly operate in. And I think, we are a believer in consolidation, we like consolidation. We think consolidation, drive cost efficiencies and in this business cost is everything. So, we would be always looking for a consolidation opportunity. But what I'd say right now is that, our primary focus is the way Raef as described it. We've got about a million tons going to -- that's going to -- we've already seen some of that this year, but by the end of next year, we'll have a total of a million tons of incremental capacity, which I think is great and we'll continue to look for both brownfield opportunities, but also M&A opportunities, but they have to make economic sense.

Your next question comes from the line of Steve Hansen from Raymond James. Your line is open.

You've already described a number of different initiatives around M&A and retail and digital strategy expansion. I'm just curious Chuck, how you think about all these opportunities relative to your own stock right now in terms of capital deployments, stocks, not trading it. It's really lofty levels. Do you think about share repurchases being a priority through the back half of this year and into next or do you feel like the opportunities are still better on the internal side? Thanks.

Good morning, Steve. So from a capital allocation perspective, what I'd say is, as we look forward, some things haven't changed and we're going to keep an eye on some other things, Obviously, for us, we want to make sure that our assets are very safe and reliable and so we would allocate capital to sort of sustainability of our asset. The balance sheet, of course, we've got a strong balance sheet today, I think Pedro and the finance team at the company has done a great job. And we want to ensure that we have maximum financial flexibility with that balance sheet, we do consider it to be a core asset for us as we move forward. And then the dividend, so the dividend as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we like having a dividend policy where the dividend will grow and it's sustainable. And we've always said, we want that dividend to be around 40% to 60% of our free cash flow. And at this point in the cycle, that's exactly where it is, but it's less than 60% which is where we would expect it with the pricing that we've seen in the last few months or so. Now, going forward, though, nothing is going to change in those three areas. The look forward for us, though is that, we are trying to balance the need to grow the retail platform. We did see some great opportunities in Brazil. I think that Ruralco acquisition, it's been a positive already, and it's got so much potential. But you're right, when we look at our stock, that would also be a very strong use of capital. So we're going to continue to assess things. I think before we would get more interested in a buyback. It's less about the financial strength of the company and just a bit more of certainty in the forward markets when it comes to not just the agricultural industry, but the overall economic backdrop. So we're going to take a bit of a wait and see approach on the buybacks. And of course, we're working through the rest of our growth platforms, but they will be -- buybacks will be part of the decision on any internal investment. We will always compare a buyback to say an acquisition in a different country or in the United States, for example, because that's the prudent thing to do. And we've always done that.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Tupholme from TD Securities. Your line is open.

Can you elaborate on your expectations for industrial ammonia demand in the second half and talk about what you've seen so far through the first portion of Q3? And then, also what you've got baked into guidance as far as industrial ammonia demand?

Okay. So why don't we have Jason Newton just talk a little bit about the outlook for industrial demand and then I can try to give you some perspective on guidance. So Jason, go ahead.

Yes, sure. So we've started to see some improvements in certain markets, particularly if you look at China, for example, the industrial ammonia used to start to pick up and in fact, Chinese imports of ammonia were pretty much in line with your levels for the first half of the year. I mean, we've also seen demand start to pick up in some of the surrounding Asian markets, which has provided some support to that region. On the other hand, in the Western markets in Europe and North America, the rebound has been a little bit slower. So overall, on a year-over-year basis, we'd expect industrial nitrogen demand to be down about 10%. But we expect agricultural growth to offset that. So it's pretty flat, overall, nation demand outlook.

And then, the way we built our guidance is, we still believe our order book is strong. So there'll be a shift of our product mix into agriculture. And if we get an early harvest and a nice wide fall application season, we've seen that in historical years. Our guidance really doesn't reflect a volume change, in fact our volume should be quite strong. It's just the reason we took the top end of the guidance range down is, we just -- we were expecting stronger pricing, but because of the slightly softer industrial demand that Jason's outlined quite nicely. We don't think we're going to see the same price momentum that we normally would in the fourth quarter.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Piken from Cleveland Research. Your line is open.

I'm just wanted to ask about your expectations for the fall season. Sounded like you're pretty optimistic view for retail. And if we do end up getting kind of a bigger fall season and there's potentially contraction of several million acres in corn next spring, I mean, what type of retail trajectory do you think we could see from '20 to '21, if we end up with a big spring that we have this year following the weak fall, and then potentially the strong fall season? Thank you.

Good morning, Michael. Mike Frank, do you want to take those questions?

Sure. So, Michael, obviously lot to play out until this fall. I would say, what we saw from planted acres this year, 87 million soybeans, 92 Corn, that's within our normal range. Obviously, cotton was down a couple of million acres. And those are high value acres for us. And so we would expect if weather improves in West Texas that will see some cotton acres come back next year. But I'd say look, it's too early to really forecast how '20/'21 going to play out on the retail side. But right now, the way I would think about it is, we would expect acres to likely be, somewhat similar in terms of total planted acres to what we saw this year. Obviously, the mix always changes a little bit from year-to-year depending on commodity prices. And if we get a great open fall window that'll, obviously help our business this year and then we'll get busy next spring with -- helping with the spring needs. So that said, we're expecting with the crop progress that we're seeing this year it's coming in pretty quick. It should line up for a nice open fall window for fertilizer applications at least in North America this year.

Your next question comes from the line up Silke Kueck from JPMorgan Securities. Your line is open.

I have two short potash questions. Can you discuss what effect that repricing off potash tons in China had on the offshore potash prices and have all of the tons repriced? And secondly, I was wondering what your potash's forecast is for North America like that, this year 10.9 million to 11.5 million tons forecast assume that this strong post harvest season in the U.S.?

Okay. Thank you very much for the question. Ken Seitz, why don't you take those?

Sure. Good morning and thank you. Yes. So yes, we did with the pricing of the Chinese contract there in the last day of April. We did have a price adjustment in the quarter. And so we've taken all of that. That's behind us and our results. With respect to sort of the balance of the season in this fall, we talked about a little bit on this call, but with the flush of inventories throughout the balance this year and assuming some good weather in places like China and North America and certainly we're seeing strong farmer affordability in Brazil and India. Yes, we expect as Chuck shared our guidance of 65 million to 67 million tons to be intact and being committed out into October, we'd expect our guidance of 12.1 million to 12.5 million tons to remain intact as well. Yes, which as Chuck has shared, I think positions as well as an industry and as Nutrien heading into 2021.

There are no further questions at this time. I'll turn the call over to Richard Downey, VP, Investor Relations for closing remarks.

Thanks, operator. And thank you, everyone for joining us this morning. If you have any extra questions IR is available to answer them. Thank you. Bye-bye.

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.