Good morning, and welcome to the InspireMD Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. Currently, all participants' are in a listen-only mode. Later, you will have the opportunity to ask questions during the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Please note, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to Chuck Padala with Life Advisors. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us for the InspireMD second quarter financial results and corporate update conference call. Joining us today from InspireMD are Marvin Slosman, Chief Executive Officer; and Craig Shore, Chief Financial Officer. During this call, management will be making forward-looking statements, not historical facts, which are based upon management's current expectations, beliefs and projections, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. For more information about these risks, please refer to the Risk Factors described in InspireMD's most recently filed periodic reports on Form 10-K and 10-Q or any updates in our current reports on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and InspireMD's press release that accompanies this call, particularly the cautionary statements made in it. This call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of today, August 6, 2024, except as required by law, InspireMD disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any information to reflect events or circumstances that occur after this call. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Marvin Slosman, Chief Executive Officer of InspireMD. Please go ahead, Marvin.

Thank you, Chuck, and thanks to everyone for joining our call this morning. I'd like to begin with a recap of perhaps the most significant milestone in the company's history, the presentation of one-year outcomes data for our pivotal C-GUARDIANS clinical trial of the CGuard Carotid Stent System presented at the Leipzig Interventional Course on May 28. The data presented by our lead principal investigator, Dr. Chris Metzger, System Vascular Chief at Ohio Health demonstrated an independently adjudicated major events rate of just 1.95% through 12 months post procedure, which is the lowest such event rate of any carotid pivotal trial to-date. These results build on the 30-day DSMI results of 0.95%, first presented in October of last year and established a new high bar for clinical outcomes, which remains the focus of our patient-first implant-driven strategy as we work toward an anticipated U.S. approval in the first half of 2025. As remarkable as these results are, it is important to note that they also closely mirror the results we've seen across multiple studies involving over 1,100 patients in the published peer-reviewed literature showing that similarity of excellent patient outcomes can be achieved with CGuard in real-world treatment as we've seen in this FDA IDE trial. With this data in hand, we are on track to submit a premarket approval application or PMA to the FDA this quarter, which, if approved, would allow us to execute on a robust commercial launch of CGuard Prime in the U.S. beginning in the first half of 2025. CGuard foundation of more than 55,000 devices sold to-date has consistently demonstrated superior short and long-term patient outcomes, which we believe has the potential to catalyze CGuard as the gold standard carotid implant. The presentation of these one-year results also triggered the first of four milestone-based…

Thanks, Marvin. For the second quarter ended June 30, 2024, revenue increased by $90,000 or 5.4% to $1,739,000 from $1,649,000 during the second quarter ended June 30, 2023. This increase was driven by growth in existing and new markets, offsetting a decrease in clinical trial revenue driven by the completion of C-GUARDIANS enrollment in June of last year. For the three months ended June 30, 2024, gross profit decreased by $160,000 or 32.6% to $331,000 from $491,000 during the equivalent period last year. This decrease in gross profit resulted from an increase in material and labor costs, mainly due to compensation expense for new and current employees higher sales volume, additional space to build capacity for anticipated increased volume requirements and additional training expenses as we begin to scale our capacity to accommodate the planned U.S. launch beginning next year offset by an increase in revenue. Gross margin decreased to 19% during the three months ended June 30, 2024, from 29.8% during the three months ended June 30, 2023, driven by the factors just mentioned. Total operating expenses for the second quarter of 2024 were $8,591,000, an increase of $2,785,000 or 48%, compared to the $5,806,000 for the second quarter of 2023. This increase was primarily due to an increase in compensation and development expenses with the vast majority being non-cash share-based compensation-related expenses. Net loss for the second quarter of 2024 totaled $7,909,000 or $0.22 per basic and diluted share, compared to a net loss of $5,077,000 or $0.24 per basic and diluted share for the same period in 2023. As of June 30, 2024, cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $47.2 million compared to $39 million as of December 31, 2023. This includes gross proceeds of $17.9 million from the exercise of the Series H warrants related to the announcement of the one-year follow-up from the C-GUARDIANS pivotal trial. This concludes our prepared remarks. We will now open up the call for questions. Operator?

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. And we will take our first question from Adam Maeder with Piper Sandler.

Hi, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the questions here. Congrats on the progress. Apologies, I was having some technical issues. So you may have covered some of this in the prepared remarks, Marvin. But I guess the first question I wanted to ask was just around the full data from C-GUARDIANS that was presented at LINC. I'm just curious what type of feedback you've gotten thus far obviously, very low adverse event rates on the composite primary end point both at 30 days and one year. I think that's straightforward. But I'm curious if there's other subtleties in the data that you think are worth kind of mentioning or calling out for investors. And then I had a handful of follow-ups.

Yes. Thanks for the question, Adam. Obviously, we're pleased with the data as best-in-class and really first-time results. I think the thing that was remarkable to us as well was just the consistency of that data as it compared to our ongoing trials outside the U.S. and our real-world experience. So in addition to being able to I think continue to bolster our confidence that we'll be able to get approval with these kinds of results and focused on the FDA effort. We're also pleased with just the overall consistency having sold a lot of stents and studied them in markets outside of the U.S. work. So I think on balance, we were pleased on all those levels.

That's good color. I appreciate that. And then I wanted to pivot over to the U.S. launch and specifically ask about kind of the U.S. sales force hiring process. And I'm going to lump this in for Craig to just kind of OpEx spend going forward. So just remind us how you're thinking about U.S. commercialization and headcount for CGuard launch in the first half of 2025? And how do we think about kind of the OpEx spend as we go-forward in subsequent quarters.

Well, I think it is the question, the right question that we've all been asking and working on hard within the company. All of our focus right now is on U.S. readiness, not just commercially, but operationally as well. We established a great relationship with a couple of recruiting firms. I think the inbound interest in joining our company has also been overwhelming, which has been great. So I think we've got a great talent pool set up to both produce support and launch the product in the U.S. And over the next several months, we'll be building that and adding that. Obviously, the timing of this is important, especially on an OpEx basis. We want to time our hires appropriately and get the right infrastructure in place as well. We announced a U.S.-based headquarters in Southeast Florida. We're beginning to build that process out. So I think on balance, we're trying to be ready for an appropriate aggressive launch of the product when we get approval without overspending in the process. But I would say that in terms of talent and access and availability, we've been really overwhelmed by the levels of interest and quality of talent. So we're pleased by that and looking forward to adding those people to the team.

That's helpful, Marvin. Yes, go ahead.

Hi Adam, it's Craig. So in regards to your question about operating expenses, there's two things going on right now. One is our C-GUARDIANS II and C-GUARDIANS III trial that we'll be starting shortly and that's also going to add to our operating expenses in addition to the U.S. readiness. Shane, for example, we'll be adding sales, people also have to be ready to start being able to produce in the United States as well. And also we just signed a lease for our U.S. operations. So we should be seeing an increase maybe 30% to 40% on average next year over this year, which takes into account all those pieces that I just mentioned.

That's helpful, Craig. Thanks for the incremental color there and quantifying it. Okay. Great. And I guess, just wanted to now ask about C-GUARDIANS II, the TCAR study. I think I saw or heard you in the prepared remarks that's expected to commence and enrollment in the back half of this year. Just curious if you can kind of give any more color around the trial design, number of patients, length of follow-up, and then I would also just love to hear some thoughts about the interest in working with InspireMD to the extent that you can share. Obviously, there's a sizable TCAR player in the market today that's out there, but just wondering kind of what the receptivity has been to a potential second TCAR competitor player, I guess, I should say. Thanks.

Yes. Thanks, Adam. Great, great question. Let's start with the end question there. I think we've been overwhelmed at the amount of enthusiasm and interest by the vascular surgery community in particular, we had a great SVS meeting and we're just, again, overwhelmed by the number of vascular surgeons that are interested in not only participating in the study effort, but looking forward to next-generation best-in-class stent platform as well as an NPS system in SwitchGuard, which also brings next-generation technology to them. So I think on balance, TCAR continues to be a priority for us as it has been for a long time. And for both our CAS program and TCAR program, the goal has been to build feature sets and next-generation thought and technology into that in order to enable as many CGuard implants as possible. That's really been the goal for quite some time. In terms of timing of trial enrollment and otherwise, we've been in touch with the FDA. We've submitted both of these programs to the FDA and are just waiting for their final approval, so that we can get started but we've already aligned ourselves with the CRO are beginning the process of how we enroll both of these efforts for both the stent with a TCAR indication as well as the broader SwitchGuard NPS kit and do that as expeditiously as we can, but also keeping in mind that we want to run a very favorable trial. So all those timelines remain consistent with what we've said before with no change.

Very helpful, Marvin. And if I could squeeze in just one last question. Would be curious to hear a little bit more about CREST-2 and I saw the press release from you guys think that was earlier this week. I -- the first question is, do you know kind of how the data is going to be presented in release. And will the data set be bifurcated by stent technology, I guess, is really the question or device manufacturer. So in other words, will you be able to compare CGuard patients and how well they did versus the other patients in the study, I guess, is the question I'm trying to ask. And then probably not a fair question, but I'll ask it anyway. Do you have a sense for when we could actually see the CREST-2 data presented or release publicly? Thanks so much for taking the question, guys.

Yes. Thanks, Adam. I'm actually going to hand that off to Shane Gleason, who's here in the room. He's been closest to the CREST-2 effort to give you the answer there.

Yes. Thanks, Marvin. Good morning, Adam. So the first analysis we expect to see will not include being split out by stent type. We know that they do plan to do that at some point. Our 23 stents represent, one way to look at it is that it's only about 4% of overall stent enrollment, so not enough to really move the needle in terms of overall results. But Marvin also mentioned that we were introduced when 82% of the trial had already been enrolled. So that's over 20% of the stents that were enrolled since then. And I know 13 of those were done in the last five months. So in terms of the pace of enrollment, we really like how quickly it was adopted by the investigators. We think that shows really favorably for our entry into the U.S. market since investigators are among the top CAS sites in the U.S. But back to your original question are 4% of the overall stents, we expect the overall rates to be low, so we don't anticipate being able to see anything measurably different in the trial results, certainly nothing that would approach statistical significance.

Thanks for the color, Shane.

You're welcome.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Frank Takkinen with Lake Street Capital Markets.

Great. Thanks for taking the questions. Maybe I'll just piggyback off Adam's question at the end there on CREST. I was hoping you could kind of give us a broad stroke theorization of what the outcomes could look like from that and how that could impact the market? I know there's a theory out there that there's a potential for less treatment of asymptomatic patients? What could something like this caused to the mix of procedures out there and how you think your position if this does come to fruition?

Yes. Frank, this is Shane. I'll go ahead and keep going with CREST here. Thanks for the question. So one thing that we recognize is that they're a very high percentage of patients diagnosed with asymptomatic carotid disease are not treated today. So the premise of the CREST-2 study was that intensive medical management has improved from the early days of carotid trials, but so is intervention. So what they're really looking at and why they're looking through four years as the primary end point is to see is the treatment effect enough to merit doing the procedure upfront. And the better your initial outcomes are, the more likely that is to happen. So we know in the CREST-2 registry, the event rates were below 3%, and that included symptomatic patients. So we're anticipating that the overall event rates will be low. And therefore, intensive medical management won't have a big head start in terms of the initial outcomes, and then through four years, especially with the inclusion of a stent like ours, we know that will do nothing but benefit the results. So if you look at the overall, the possible outcomes, one is that stents don't show an improvement over intensive medical management. And there, we think that the market looks like it does today. Remember that to be enrolled in the study, the investigator has to think that there's clinical equipoise for that patient. In other words, they need to think that, that patient may be just as well off with drugs versus an intervention. If it's a patient at the investigator "know that they need an intervention" that patient is randomized. So I think the majority of the patients that are really being treated in clinical practice today are not the ones being enrolled in CREST-2. So for those that are kind of a jump ball, we don't know if an intervention will benefit them. Those are patients that probably aren't getting interventions today and that's going to make up the majority of the patients who are enrolled. So really, the net outcome could be very favorable for stenting and for surgery, where more of those patients who are diagnosed but not treated today may be treated in the future. If this comes out looking like where there's not a difference or even where drugs show better, it probably doesn't move the market because it ends up looking a lot like it does already today.

Got it. That's helpful color. And then maybe just one last one on the commercial strategy. I know there's been a fair amount of commentary on it, but I wanted to maybe follow-up on one question related to back conversations. When can you start to have those conversations? And how do you think about getting through the different value analysis committees and after approval, during approval or however that looks in 2025?

Great question. We know entering the U.S. market, but that is the long pole of the tenant frequently. One thing I know is that creating demand with physicians will not be the hardest part of my team's job. It will be doing exactly what you just described. But we've had a lot of, I'd say, physicians volunteering to help with the process already due to their enthusiasm to get the new technology. We are ramping up our IDN outreach efforts presently and checking with them to see what we can do and when. Obviously, you can't pre-promote but in terms of when a new technology is available how do we get ourselves quickly into the queue and with built-in physician demand, where they won't go to bat for every new device but the ones they really care about, they will, we're already getting that outreach from physicians who are excited to bring CGuard, CGuard Prime into their hospitals, just from what they're hearing from the podium. So we're doing everything we can to be at the front of the line for those reviews when we get approval and we plan to have a small team already hired and onboarded at the time of approval out in the field that can move those conversations very quickly.

Got it. That’s helpful. Thanks for taking the questions.

Thanks, Frank.

Thanks, Frank. Thanks for being on the call. I'd like to thank everyone for taking the time to join the call today and for the ongoing support. We're obviously very pleased with our progress through the first half of the year and with our C-GUARDIANS data now in hand, believe that we've got line of sight for the approval for CGuard in the U.S. next year. Thanks for joining.

Thank you. This does conclude today's InspireMD second quarter 2024 earnings call. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time.