Glynis Bryan
Analyst · Raymond James. Your line is open
Thank you, Ken. For the first nine months of 2017, our core business delivered double-digit organic topline growth and high single-digit gross profit growth year-over-year, which when combined with great cost control has driven adjusted earnings from operations up 27% year-over-year in the core business. In addition, the Datalink business is performing well in line with our expectations so far this year and on track to meet its earnings target for the full-year. Let me breakdown our year-to-date financial results in a bit more detail. Consolidated net sales was $4.9 billion in the first nine months of 2017 are up 22% compared to the same period last year. In North America, net sales were up 30% year-over-year including organic growth of 17% due to the significant new large enterprise client wins and expansion within existing clients and also approximately $387 million in sales from Datalink. In EMEA, net sales year-to-date are up 6% in constant currency, reflecting particularly strong sales growth in hardware and services. And in Asia-Pacific, net sales were down 1% in constant currency due to a higher mix of net in software maintenance sales and cloud sales. As we have discussed before, we are actively engaged in helping our clients migrate to the cloud. And year-to-date, gross profit earned from cloud sales represented 13% of our consolidated gross profit. Because most cloud sales are reported net, we believe our gross profit comparisons year-to-year are our best metric for assessing our business performance. Consolidated gross profit in the first nine months of 2017 was $686 million, up 24% in U.S. dollars and up 26% in constant currency. Gross margin expanded 20 basis points to 13.9% in the first nine months of this year. This increase is driven by the addition of Datalink to our business, and the positive effect of a higher mix of net software sales, partially offset by a lower mix of fees earned on enterprise agreements, which are 100% margin, and also a higher mix of product sales to large enterprise clients. Also, on the SG&A front, consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses were $539 million, 22% year-to-date. This increase was driven primarily by the addition of Datalink to our business including purchase price amortization and low single-digit in expenses in the core business. We also recorded severance and restructuring expenses of $6.2 million in the first nine months of this year, compared to $3.1 million for the same period in the 2016. And we incurred expenses related to the acquisition of Datalink and Caase of $3.3 million in the first nine months of 2017, compared to $741,000 went on the Datalink and Ignia acquisition in the third quarter 2016. In addition, as Ken mentioned, we sold our business in Russia in the third quarter and incurred a loss on sale of $3.6 million, about $2.9 million of this was related to foreign currency translation adjustment that had previously accumulated in the equity section of our balance sheet. All of this led to adjusted earnings from operations of $147 million in the first nine months of 2017, up 32% year-over-over and up 32% in constant currency terms. GAAP earnings from operations increased 24% for the first three quarters of 2017. In addition, our effected tax rate year-to-date through September 30, was 35.6% down from 36.8% last year, due primarily to approximately $2.3 million of tax benefit to this year from the settlement of share based awards in accordance with the new accounting standard, which was adopted effective January 1, 2017. All of this led to diluted earnings per share on an adjusted basis of $2.43 this year compared to $1.81 earned in the first two quarters of 2016. GAAP diluted earnings per share were $2.11, up from $1.74 last year. Moving on to cash flow performance, in the first nine months of 2017, our operations used $324 million of cash compared to a use of $125 million for the nine months of 2016. As discussed in our last call, our Q1 2017 cash flow results were adversely impacted by the effects of a timing difference in the collection of a single large receivable in the fourth quarter 2016 of approximately $160 million for which the payment to this supplier was due and paid in January 2017. We had the exact same scenario before for amount of approximately $60 million in the Q1 of 2016. The balance of the increase year-over-year in cash used in operations was driven primarily by the higher working capital gains on significantly higher sales. We expect strong cash flow generation in the fourth quarter will partially offset the use of cash reported year-to-date through Q3 and expect that for the full-year, we will report a use of cash of between $50 million to $70 million. And we expect to return to normalized cash flow generation of $80 million to $120 million in 2018. Also in the first two quarters of 2017, we invested $16 million in capital expenditure, up significantly year-over-year due to planned investments in IT infrastructure upgrade, our website and our digital marketing platform. And we anticipate CapEx for the full-year to be between $20 million to $22 million. In addition, we expect $187 million to acquire Datalink and Caase this year. We did not buy back any stock in the first nine months of 2017, but for comparison purposes, we used $50 million to acquire shares over the same period last year. All of this led to a cash balance of $236 million at the end of the third quarter, which $193 million was less than [indiscernible] and we had $544 million at outstanding on a revolving and term debt facility. This compares to $176 million of cash and $243 million of debt outstanding at the end of the Q3 2016. From a cash flow efficiency perspective, our cash conversion cycle is 37 days in the third quarter of 2017, up 5 days year-to-year. This increase resulted from the net effect of a one-day increase in DSOs and there day decrease in DPOs due to the relative timing of client receipts and supplier payments in the respective quarters and also a one-day increase in inventory outstanding due to investments and inventory specific client engagement. I will now turn the call back to Ken for his closing comments.