Greetings and welcome to the Norfolk Southern Corporation first quarter 2021 earnings call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star, zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It’s now my pleasure to introduce your host, Meghan Achimasi, Senior Director of Investor Relations for Norfolk Southern Corporation. Thank you, you may begin.

Thank you and good morning. Please note that during today’s call, we will make certain forward-looking statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties and may differ materially from actual results. Please refer to our annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC for a full discussion of those risks and uncertainties we view as most important. Our presentation slides are available at nscorp.com in the Investors section, along with our reconciliation of non-GAAP measures used today to the comparable GAAP measures. Along those lines, recall that in the first quarter of 2020 we launched a rationalization of our locomotive fleet by 703 units, which resulted in a non-cash charge of $385 million, so we will speak to the quarterly results excluding that charge. A full transcript and download will be posted after the call. It is now my pleasure to introduce Norfolk Southern’s Chairman, President and CEO, Jim Squires.

Good morning everyone and welcome to Norfolk Southern’s first quarter 2021 earnings call. Joining me today are Cindy Sanborn, Chief Operating Officer; Alan Shaw, Chief Marketing Officer; and Mark George, Chief Financial Officer. Norfolk Southern started strong in 2021. Our successful implementation of precision scheduled railroading translated into solid financial results. Our team delivered all-time records for operating ratio and free cash flow and achieved first quarter records for earnings per share and operating income. Northern Southern employees accomplished this despite significant supply chain disruptions brought on by severe weather nationwide in February. For the quarter, revenue increased 1% due primarily to volume growth up 3% year-over-year. At the same time, expenses declined 3% or $48 million compared to our adjusted first quarter of 2020. Throughout the quarter, we continued to streamline resources resulting in impressive gains in workforce asset and fuel productivity. Looking ahead, we remain intent on achieving strong revenue growth and efficiencies to propel the bottom line and create shareholder value. Investments in technology and sustainability will be critical, and I’ll provide some recent examples of these after we review the quarter. But first, let me turn the call over to the team to go through the quarterly results in more detail, starting with Cindy.

Good morning. I am excited to share our first quarter achievements and what we have in the hopper looking ahead. Our team on the ground is proving its capability and motivation to move quickly on advancing efficiency and restoring service reliability. We’ve also introduced a few new team members with PSR experience who are leading initiatives alongside our field team to increase productivity inside our major hump and flat switching terminals. These actions are having an immediate impact for our shareholders and our customers. Slide 6 shows our operational indicators. While volumes were variable in the quarter, efficiency gains were consistent. By absorbing additional volumes within our existing train network, despite how those volumes varied during the quarter, we were able to realize substantial gains in train length and train weight and improve fuel efficiency. Productivity initiatives such as locomotive horsepower optimization and additional usage of distributed power were key to the success. Execution of our efficient scheduled railroading plan enabled us to handle more freight with fewer resources compared to a year ago. Let me add some more color on train length. We are committed to improving productivity by running longer trains, and accomplishing that involves targeted investments within certain parts of our network. During the quarter, we completed an initial assessment of incremental infrastructure that will aid our long train initiative. As a result, we’ve begun construction on a long siding extension in the Chicago-Atlanta corridor that will be complete ahead of this year’s peak season, and we have identified two others that we will begin construction on this year. We will quickly identify and address opportunities to efficiently deploy capital to support both train consolidation and organic growth. Moving to Slide 7, weekly carload fluctuations tell an important story of the quarter. Volumes rose quickly coming out…

Thank you Cindy, and good morning everyone. Beginning on Slide 11, we experienced significant volume volatility in the first quarter. We delivered a strong start to the year with January volume exceeding last year, while February was challenged with winter weather events that disrupted supply chains cross the country. Progressing into March, business levels improved as supply chain fluidity started to recover and we adjusted to dynamic shifts in the freight environment. I will now turn to Slide 12, highlighting our revenue and volume performance for the first quarter of 2021. Despite the difficult operating conditions, overall revenue improved 1% year-over-year to $2.6 billion while volume grew 3%. Revenue per unit excluding fuel improved in each of our individual business units this quarter, reflecting our commitment to grow yield as part of our long-term strategy, though total revenue per unit and revenue per unit excluding fuel were down slightly due to the mix of intermodal volume growth with declines in merchandise volume. Merchandise revenue fell 4% from prior year levels on a 3% volume decline. This segment faced difficult pre-COVID comps in the energy sector. Partially offsetting these declines were gains in soybean, steel and automotive shipments. March U.S. light vehicle sales surged to a 17.7 million unit seasonally adjusted annual rate, the second highest March ever, while inventories are at a 10-year low. Merchandise revenue per unit excluding fuel reached a record high for the quarter, delivering 24 consecutive quarters of year-over-year improvement in this market. Intermodal revenue and volume both increased compared to the first quarter of 2020. Volume growth was driven by a continuation of the inventory replenishment cycle combined with the tight truck market and strength in consumer activity as retail sales grew 9.8% in March, the largest sequential increase since May 2020 when sales initially…

Thanks Alan. As Jim mentioned, the OR and EPS records we achieved in the quarter came through disciplined cost control while handling additional volume in the midst of pretty challenging operating conditions. On Slide 15, walking you through our summarized results compared with an adjusted first quarter 2020, we reported an OR of 61.5%, which was a 220 basis point improvement, and an earnings per share improvement of $0.08. I will note that the $0.08 improvement in EPS was dampened by the absence of a gain recognized last year from a 2012 income tax refund that equated to $0.09, so core EPS improvement in the quarter was $0.17. Moving to Slide 16, revenue grew 1% in the quarter due primarily to the 3% increase in volume year-over-year, with growth in intermodal and coal more than offsetting declines in merchandise. At the same time, we drove operating expenses down by 3% as we harvested additional benefits from workforce and asset productivity. The volume growth coupled with the productivity drove the operating ratio down to a record low 61.5%, improving 220 basis points year-over-year and 30 basis points sequentially versus Q4. This produced operating income of $1 billion, another record, up $62 million or 7% year-over-year, and we generated first quarter free cash flow of $750 million, also a record, up $161 million or 27% versus the first quarter of 2020. Moving to a drill down of operating expense improvement on Slide 17, the reduction of $48 million or 3% comes with improvements in nearly all expense categories. Material and other were collectively down $15 million or 9% as we continued to see lower spend associated with fewer but more productive locomotives thanks to the rationalization of equipment last year. Fuel expense was down $12 million with benefits evenly split between price…

Thank you Mark. You’ve heard this morning about all the productivity improvements stemming from our adoption of PSR. Our company is also in the middle of a digital transformation. We expect investments in technology to drive the next phase of improvements in service growth, efficiency and sustainability at Norfolk Southern, and we’re already making great headway. Slide 22 shows a few recent examples. The introduction of new mobile apps and a redesign of our customer portal are giving customers a more user-friendly and truck-like experience, delivering real time shipment intelligence, facility truck to rail conversions, and reducing emissions. We’re putting an easy-to-use mobile application in the hands of our train conductors, streamlining internal workflow and improving shipment visibility for customers. We’re digitizing our internal and external communications through a new CRM platform, enabling better, faster decision making. We’re using new information systems to promote intermodal equipment utilization and efficiency at our intermodal terminals. We’re using predictive analytics to reduce locomotive failures and plan maintenance proactively. Machine vision technology is creating a path to automated track and freight car inspections with manifold benefits to safety and efficiency. On Slide 23, we show that NS has been a sustainability leader for over a decade. Years ago, we recognized the importance of reducing our environment footprint, beginning in 2007 when we first established our sustainability program. We’ve been reporting on our results ever since, delivering on the goals we set forth. Here we highlight a few key milestones and also show a few examples of external recognition, including recently being named by the Wall Street Journal as one of the 100 Most Sustainably Managed Companies. In summary, we have a track record of leadership on sustainability which is good for business and the right thing to do for all our stakeholders. Although we…

[Operator instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Chris Wetherbee with Citi. Please proceed with your question.

Okay, thanks. Good morning everybody. I wanted to see if we could start with the outlook, particularly the operating ratio, so strong performance in the first quarter. If you look at normal seasonality, it actually seems like you’re on kind of a 60 or maybe even sub-60 run rate as it stands right now, based on what you’ve been able to achieve first quarter through the rest of the year in the last five years. Maybe you can give us some thoughts and your view on that progress towards that 60 run rate, and are there some things from a cost perspective that we should keep in mind as the year progresses or maybe is there the opportunity to potentially exceed your expectations?

Good morning Chris. Let me begin by pointing out that while seasonality certainly hasn’t been repealed, it was a strong first quarter and somewhat anomalous, given the surge of volume we’ve experienced both in the first quarter and in the fourth quarter due to the economies reopening. Also, we were out there with some bullish guidance, some pretty bullish outlook on the economy during 2021 early. In January, we forecast 9% volume growth for the year, so we got ahead of this. We were feeling bullish about the economy and the business opportunity way back in January. So here we are now - we’ve posted a great first quarter, it’s a good start to the year. We’re off and running, and we remain optimistic about the year to come. I’m sure we’ll talk a lot more about the specifics during the call, but we remain optimistic and we’re going to continue to push. We expect to be where we said we would be back in January by the end of this year in terms of OR.

Okay, that’s helpful. I appreciate it. Then maybe just a follow-up on the progress you’re making in workforce productivity you highlighted on Slide 18 and some of the other efforts you’re making around PSR. It seems like the process is unfolding quite nicely, so can you talk maybe about sort of the bigger picture, maybe beyond 2021 - you know, what maybe the opportunity is for you to continue to improve the cost structure of the business?

Chris, this is Cindy. I’ll answer your question, and I appreciate the question. You know, as we talked about and you saw in Mark’s notes--slides around GTMs per employee, that was a record for us this quarter even with all the challenges that we face, and we’re going to continue to see opportunities as we consolidate trains, get longer trains. We are making some investments that I called out in my remarks that help us with train length by investing in some sidings. Part of PSR, and as I’ve learned it through the last few years, it is about getting your plan right-sized for the time and then continuing to tweak it, continuing to find efficiencies in places that maybe you don’t expect. I think we’ll be able to see continued improvement in locomotive utilization, fuel, headcount, all of those areas beyond 2021. As Jim described, when we were thinking about where we should be at the end of this year, we’re not going to stop with where we end up. We’ll continue to find those opportunities, so I feel very, very good about what the team has accomplished so far, even with a very challenging, very volatile first quarter of this year, and that gives me great confidence that we’ll continue through 2021 and into ’22 with very good efficiency performance.

Okay, well thanks very much for the time. Appreciate it.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Justin Long with Stephens Inc. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks and good morning. Jim, I know you said you weren’t going to comment on the proposed mergers from the Canadian rails and KCS, but I did just want to ask generally if you had any thoughts around rail mergers and your willingness to participate in further consolidation if the opportunity were to present itself.

Well Justin, I recognize that this situation is kind of dominating the airwaves right now, and there are a lot of interested industry stakeholders focused on the proposed transaction, including NS, and we will be protective of our shareholders’ interests and our customers’ interests. We will be active participants in any transaction that may transpire out of this. With that said, I really think it would not be fruitful for us this morning to focus on other people’s deals - you know, hypothetical knock-on effects, what the STB may do, etc., but rather let’s focus on our first quarter, which I humbly submit was pretty spectacular, and our outlook for the rest of the year.

Fair enough. Maybe for my follow-up, just to circle back to the guidance, the guidance for the OR improvement of 300 basis points, or greater than 300 basis points this year, is somewhat open ended. Mark, I’m curious - has anything changed in terms of your expectation on headcount this year, and then maybe you could comment on yields and what you’re thinking for RPU as well.

Sure. With regard to headcount, you may recall back in January, Cindy and I reiterated that we would expect headcount and employment levels to be flat to down over the course of this year despite the volume guidance that we gave, which was high single digits leading to revenue that would be roughly 9%. We’re tracking to that right now and we actually believe that we will continue to stay on that guidance for the balance of this year, so we’re feeling good about the way that’s unfolding and transpiring. Alan, you want to talk a little bit about yields and RPU?

Yes Justin, we had talked about to expect a reduction in revenue per unit in the first quarter and then year-over-year growth in quarters two through four. That’s still our anticipation. I expect that we’ll see RPU growth through the remainder of the year and full year. We’re sticking with our 9% revenue guidance for the year. Most of that is associated with volume increases, so RPU will improve slightly. That’s more of a reflection of mix with intermodal growing pretty rapidly and strength in the lower RPU export thermal market than it is with respect to price.

Okay, I appreciate the time.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Scott Group with Wolfe Research. Please proceed with your question.

Yes, thanks. Morning guys. Just a couple things on the cost side. Compensation per employee was up a lot. Any thoughts on how to model that? Then we’ve just seen a little volatility in purchase services costs. Just any thoughts on how to model that, if that stays down year-over-year, if that starts to trend higher. Thank you.

Thanks Scott for the question. Comp and ben per employee was up 11% in the first quarter, and really roughly half of that was related to the incentive and stock-based comp headwind that we reported there on the slide in the first quarter. You can expect that that kind of headwind will persist throughout the balance of this year. The other half of the headwind is really split between the increase we saw in the first quarter in overtime, which shouldn’t persist throughout the balance of the year, as well as the normal couple, few points of wage inflation headwind as well as some little uptick in payroll tax that should also persist. There will be some level of comp headwind. It won’t be 11% in the balance of the year, but maybe a little bit more than half of that is probably a good way to model it. Now for purchase services, it was a low quarter for us for sure. I think the rest of the year is going to depend on kind of the volumetric pieces that we continue to work on, but engineering--remember engineering spend, that will step up during the summer months, and also IT. A lot of the IT investments are going to really start to hit us more in the back half of the year, second, third, fourth quarter, so I do think that you’ll see purchase services up from this level, probably back to where we were in the fourth quarter. That’d probably be a good way to model it quarterly going forward.

Okay, thanks. Then Alan, just quickly for you, can you just talk about the underlying pricing environment and what you’re seeing there?

Yes Scott, it’s improving, as you would anticipate. We’re seeing commodity prices move up, steel prices are at record highs. You’ve seen strength in lumber, you’ve seen strength in grain products, seen strength in plastics, and as we’ve progress through the first couple months of the year, we’ve raised our plan on our transactional business within intermodal. Now, recognize that’s a very small component of our franchise; however, we are seeing continued strength in the trucking market. Some of the things I’m reading, Scott, are point to the fact that truck capacity is actually projected to tighten throughout the year from a very robust environment right now, so we’re feeling pretty good about the pricing environment for the remainder of this year and as we move into 2022.

Okay, thank you guys.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Allison Landry with Credit Suisse. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning, thanks. Some of the other rails that have implemented PSR provide trip plan compliance metrics for car load and intermodal networks. Is this something that you guys look at closely, and if so, could you just give us a sense for where you might be tracking on this metric or whatever metric you think is most relevant? Just really trying to understand how network reliability has improved and where it stands today, outside of just looking at the public service metrics that we can see.

Allison, thank you. What I will say is what we share with you is what we’re really working on, and you’ve seen since I’ve been here, not necessarily service related but we added train length to some of the measures that we provide some color on. On the service piece, we did have service deliver index - SDI, and found that that wasn’t something we’re really managing to. What we’re managing to more as we put in PSR was car velocity, and so that’s going to be the area that we’re focusing on and have developed that measure, broadly created the ability to drill down for accountability at local levels, looked at it beyond just the geographic component, also the car type component of car velocity, what car types are moving faster than others, and that’s really where we’re going to be headed in how we think about that and talk about that. In time to come, we’ll also share that with you.

Okay, perfect. Cindy, also you talked about the use of distributed power - obviously that I’m sure is contributing to the improvement in fuel efficiency. Could you give us--like, what percent of the trains are now equipped or running with BPUs, and then just in terms of closing the gap with some of your peers in terms of gallons per GPM, when you think about the ways that you can improve that, are BPUs and expanding the use of them a big driver, or is it more increased train length and weight? If you could sort of speak to the different drivers and if you expect the fuel efficiency or the improvement to accelerate as we move through 2021. Thank you.

Okay Allison. I would say that all of the above that you mentioned, including energy management, are levers for us to continue to improve in locomotive utilization and therefore fuel demand, so I see a very strong opportunity to continue to run our trains at full capability of locomotives - we call that full pen. I’ve talked about that on earlier calls. In our manifest network, we’re at full pen maybe 13% to 15% of the time at this point on a district by district basis, so we see some opportunity there. You talked about distributed power. We have--actually, we increased distributed power utilization on trains that we didn’t use distributed power by 11%, almost 12% in the first quarter. It is a record for us, and the last record was fourth quarter, so we have real good trajectory with distributed power which, to your point, is also beneficial to us from a fuel perspective. We’ve got a lot of work to do on fuel, and those are the areas that we’re working on to get us there.

Great, thanks Cindy.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ravi Shanker with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks, good morning everyone. A couple of questions on intermodal, maybe looking out a little bit here. Cindy, what percentage of your carload volumes do you think will be intermodal about maybe three years from now, kind of just looking at the growth trajectory there versus the other end markets? Also, how does the mix in intermodal today compare to where it was a few years ago? Just trying to see if that mix gap that has traditionally existed is closing or not.

Ravi, we’re expecting the intermodal to lead our growth for the next couple years. Actually, I should point to consumer-oriented products. We’ve got an unrivalled intermodal franchise in the east. We also serve more U.S. vehicle production than any other railroad in North America, and we’ve got a consumer oriented merchandise franchise where we’re actively focused on providing a truck-like product there to compete with trucks. We’re really intent on providing the simplicity of trucks coupled with the efficiency of rail, and that revolves around a very highly reliable and predictable service product with very good digital tools for our interface with our customers. That’s where you’re going to see the growth markets from us, and then we’ll participate in the ebbs and flows within the commodity markets. You know, you don’t have to go back that long - 2011, we had $3.5 billion of coal revenue and about 45% of our overall revenue was associated with the energy markets. Now, we’ve got about $1 billion of coal revenue and we’ve got about $2 billion in the energy markets, so despite that mix and despite that shift, we’ve improved our margin profile as well, so we’re very confident in our plan going forward. We’ve got a robust franchise that faces the fastest growing segments of the U.S. economy, which is going to benefit our customers and our shareholders.

Got it, thanks for that update. Also, kind of just following up on the digital update that you gave us, which was very useful, I’m wondering if you guys have spent much time at all thinking about autonomous trucks and how that might come into the network or influence the truck market over the next several years, and just what your view there is.

It’s a threat and we view it as such. The time horizon is somewhat uncertain, but it’s certainly something to be aware of and to be planning for, and we are. We are doing so through efforts to automate our own operations and to go down the path of more efficient and productive railroading via automation, via digital investments ourselves.

That said, we know that in our industry, we’ve got a much more attractive sustainability profile even if trucking goes on an automated fashion. We still provide a better sustainability solution.

Great, thanks everyone.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Thomas Wadewitz with UBS. Please proceed with your question.

Yes, good morning. I wanted to see if you could comment--I guess this is probably for Cindy. Obviously there’s some constraints across the system, I think we’ve seen it at some of the intermodal terminals. Some of it is kind of in your control, probably a lot of it is not. How do you think about where you’re at from a fluidity perspective at some of your key intermodal terminals, and what needs to be done to see that improve?

Alan, why don’t you take that one?

Yes. Tom, if you’ll permit, I’d like to cover that because it involves that intersection between our network and our customers’ network. What you’ve seen and what you continue to see is stress across the entire supply chain. That can be with warehouses, which are having trouble with productivity associated with COVID protocols, but they’re also having trouble with labor staffing. You see that in the drayage community as well, and so that could back things up. Despite that, we delivered 13% increase in intermodal revenue ex-fuel surcharge in the quarter on top of 11% improvement in intermodal revenue ex-fuel surcharge in the fourth quarter. We’ve got a great franchise, we’ve got the best channel partners in the industry. We are collaborating with them on how to solve some of these issues and help them grow even more.

I’d add to that, Tom, from the network perspective, we work really closely with intermodal terminal folks to make sure we are moving trains appropriately for the support--with the freight that can actually be offloaded, so there’s good coordination so that any challenges within the terminals do not spill over onto [indiscernible].

Right, okay. Then for a follow-up, Cindy, you had implemented some changes in the southeast part of the network, I believe it was fourth quarter. When you make changes, sometimes there are adjustments to the new schedule or new flow of traffic, and then you’ve also had weather and growing volumes. How do you think that that--you know, did that work well, and how do you think about additional schedule changes, or do you think you kind of stick with the current schedule and just execute against that?

Thanks for the question. The southeast plan that you describe, we actually started implementing in November, very beginning of November, and we’re largely through some of the adjustments that we needed to make as we came into the first part of the year. That was working well, then we kind of hit this volatility that I described in my prepared remarks that was induced by weather, that was--and also volume, and so I step back from the southeast plan and almost go all the way back to the changes with Top 21 and our terminal footprint and how it’s changed, the consolidation of trains to make longer trains and how that’s been beneficial to us, and we really pressure tested it with volume and we had to make some adjustments, some in the southeast plan, certainly across the north. You saw our service product, maybe as we came out of March, we were starting to really see some improvements in dwell and train velocity, but we did have to do some tweaks. We had to get back in there and make some changes. They were highly productive, they helped us be more effective and efficient, and I think we’ll continue to see the service-related measures improve. Real pleased with some of the work particularly at Bellevue and Elkhart, that has taken place over the last couple of weeks and months, and I think we’re really on a good glide path. I will also say that all the changes we made, the volatility that we worked through in the quarter, we didn’t see cars online jump up. We were able to continue to move, continue work with our customers so that we didn’t see a drag on additional car volume that was sitting on the network, so I feel really good about where we are and a lot of good work went into getting us to this point. I’m very, very pleased with the team.

Great, thank you for the perspective.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Amit Mehrotra with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks, morning everybody. Mark, you provided that cost structure slide in the past, the fixed versus variable cost structure and kind of the implications for incremental margin. The cost structure, I guess, is obviously evolving as you implement PSR, but there’s obviously a lot of revenue growth year-on-year in the second quarter and hopefully beyond. I know you guys have this OR target out there that’s helpful, but what’s the right calibration for incrementals on that growth, on that outsized growth in Q2 and beyond just relative to the cost structure disclosure you’ve provided in the past?

Thanks Amit. Look, our outlook is to generate strong incrementals throughout the balance of the year, and that’s how we’re going to accrete and grow our operating ratio--sorry, shrink our operating ratio. Our goal here is on pretty much all line items to absorb and hold the--absorb the volume and hold the cost as flat as possible, and that’s kind of the challenge and the mandate we’ve given to the organization. That’s going to really translate into the OR improvement that we’re projecting. As I mentioned, you’ll have some geography. Purchase services really started off strong. Probably going to see that pop a little bit, for the reasons I just cited a few minutes ago, but when we look at some of the other line items like rents and comp and ben, etc., our goal is really to just try to hold firm and absorb volume, so I think you’re going to see good incrementals the rest of the year.

So if I’m just interpreting your comments, this $1.6 billion opex base is kind of the neighborhood you’re going to be in over the course of the year as revenue ramps? Is that correct?

That’s kind of where we’re targeting. I’m not going to get more precise than rounding to the hundreds of millions, but yes, that’s our goal, is to sit there and try to hold cost while we absorb the volume. But of course, one of the variables, Amit, is fuel will go up throughout the balance of the year - we are projecting that, but we should have some--hopefully some lag on fuel. Surcharge should help mitigate some of that too.

Okay, that’s helpful, thank you. Then just one quick follow-up for Alan, I guess. The coal yields, consistently kind of surprised to the upside, and then just wondering your best guess in terms of where you think coal yields will shake out as we progress through the remainder of the year.

Yes Amit, good morning. I’d prefer to surprise to the upside than the downside on yields.

That’s for sure.

We did call out a specific volume shortfall accrual in the quarter that was $9 million ahead of last year, so with that respect, that helped. We had a lot of cross currents with respect to our overall yield in coal as well. I talked a lot about export thermal - for us, we were able to deliver 66% growth in export thermal coal in the quarter, and that’s due very specifically to the great service product that we’ve had into that market. We’re happy to have that business, it’s accretive to our margins, our bottom line, and helps OR; however, it does come with a lower overall RPU. Then within the utility franchise, we actually had more growth in our utility south franchise than utility north, which is positive for overall RPU, so there’s a lot of things going on within coal. With export thermal as the growth driver, going forward that’s primarily going to put pressure on overall RPU and, frankly, we’ll see what happens in the utility franchise. We’ve got a number of plants right now whose stockpiles have deteriorated over the winter, but very few are in the process of rebuilding stockpiles now, which is frankly what you would expect during shoulder months. That’s a point of caution going forward, is utility volumes and how that shakes out, and then what’s the impact on overall RPU.

Yes, okay. Makes sense. Thank you very much. Congrats on the good results. Appreciate it.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jordan Alliger with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, good morning. Just a quick question on intermodal and the pricing. It seems like the yield-up maybe is turning a real corner - 6% ex-fuel. I’m just curious specifically on intermodal yields, given the truck tightness and hopefully service getting better, as you alluded to, is this a yield number, sort of a core yield number that we could think about going forward from here?

Jordan, we had some positive mix associated with our intermodal franchise. We saw domestic volumes increase more than international volumes through the quarter. Domestic is generally a 53-foot container relative to a 40-foot container but has a higher RPU. Then even within that, you see that supercharge LTL premium market, which is benefiting RPU. I’ll remind you and everyone else that we’ve got 17 consecutive quarters of overall RPU improvement in our air modal franchise through cycles in the market. There was--contract rates in the truck market went down last year, and yet our intermodal RPU ex-fuel was up 3.4%. There was a truck recession in 2019, and yet our intermodal RPU ex-fuel went up 2.4%, so we take a very steady approach to valuing the quality of our product and in our approach with our channel partners. We really want them to be able to grow and compete, and so what they’re looking for from us is rate surety over the course of the year as they go into their bid cycles. Over time, our intermodal RPU ex-fuel in our pricing has outpaced that of the contract market and the spot market, and we’re leading in growth, so I think we’ve got the right strategy going forward to deliver value for our intermodal channel partners and our shareholders.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brian Ossenbeck with JP Morgan. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Maybe one for Cindy. Can you just give us a sense as to how you see resources in terms of headcount out in the field, if any of the different regions require a little bit more attention or not, how the recall from furloughs is going, how retention is going, that sort of thing, especially when you look at the strong growth you’re expecting? You mentioned there’s a few, it sounded like leaders maybe a little bit higher up - we saw one announced. Are there any other folks with maybe a bit more PSR experience that you’re looking to bring onboard?

Yes Brian, on the headcount side on [indiscernible], I mentioned or you saw--I’ll start with this, you saw it in Mark’s slides that we’re continuing to improve in our productivity. We are--and we are guiding to be flat to down from where we ended December. All that is still in play. We are however--we have recalled furloughs in many of our locations where we’re out of furloughs, and we are doing some spot hiring. It’s not broad-based, and frankly it’s to help offset attrition slightly. We do have attrition that continues quarter by quarter, year by year, so we are doing some hiring. We want to make sure we provide a good service product to our customers. We’re very integrated with what the forecast looks like with Alan’s team and have spent a lot of time working on a training plan that gives us a lot more agility in being able to respond when we need to, in places where we do see attrition and we need to backfill. We’ve kind of decentralized our raining and gotten it down to a much shorter period of time, about eight weeks, where we’re actually training folks in the places where they’re going to work, so they’re still going to be a very safe employee but we’re able to condense the amount of--I guess improve the speed to market, if you will, and respond to needs of service. We’ve got to provide a good service product to our customers. With the volume that we’re seeing, we will need to hire, but I feel really good about the process that we have and the ability for us to continue to manage that, and overall still improve our productivity around T&E productivity. I forgot your second question.

PSR talent.

Yes, sorry - PSR talent.

Yes, so we did publicly announce Hunt Cary joining from UP. He and I had worked together over several different stops in our career in different railroads. He’s been a real good add, integrated well with the team. There are several others in the organization that we have brought on, and if we have a need, we will continue to find good fits for them within NS. I think part of it is the integration of it, and that’s gone very, very well, and I think the long tenured NS folks are happy to have the additional support and helping them make the changes that we need. I feel really good about where we are, and we’ll always be looking for places where we can bring external folks in with PSR experience that can help us achieve our goals.

Right. Okay, thanks Cindy. One quick one for Mark. Can you just--obviously a very strong quarter, but can you give us some sense as to if you quantify the impact of weather or, I guess more specifically, on fuel with timing lags, how that impacted the quarter would be helpful to put into context as well. Thank you.

Yes, we didn’t really quantify weather. I mean, certainly it did have an impact. We felt it in the form of higher overtime, certainly higher re-crews. We had some snow removal costs as well. We just didn’t think it was material enough to break out. Look, overall fuel was a headwind in the quarter because we didn’t really get the lag benefit of the fuel surcharge coming through here in the first quarter, so we had $34 million of headwind in fuel revenue. But we did have very good fuel efficiency performance that provided good tailwind for us on the expense side, and I think you saw the numbers on the slide for fuel. Thanks Brian.

Right, thanks Mark.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brandon Oglenski with Barclays. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, good morning everyone. Alan, I wanted to come back to intermodal pricing, because I think on the January call you did imply that you weren’t going to get a lot of pricing benefit from the tight trucking market until 2022. I think you did mention a few mix impacts on yield - I think the suggestion was that those yields are going to be sustainable throughout the year, but can you talk maybe more explicitly on pricing in that market and any differences between domestic or international?

Yes Brandon, what we’re seeing is the pricing environment continues to improve. The truck capacity tightness we expect is going to last through this year and into next year. I was looking at something last night, and it makes sense - warehousing and trucking are pulling from the same blue collar pool out there, and you know what’s going on in the warehousing market, rates are up 8% year-over-year. As people are forward positioning inventory next to the end markets, that’s a tight market. In our transactional intermodal business, we are updating our price plan; however as I noted, that’s a relatively small component of our overall price. I’ve talked through our rate structure with our customers, and so you can see that over time we’re going to exceed contract and spot rates. As I noted, it’s over time. We have long term contracts, we want to make sure that we provide our channel partners, who are phenomenal at growing, with surety on their rates as they go through bid season. We take a measured approach, it takes time. Over time, it’s the right thing to do for our customers and our shareholders.

Okay, so just to clarify, it’s mostly mix then that we saw on the acceleration in yields?

Yes.

Okay, and then one last quick follow-up for Cindy. Cindy, you mentioned that you guys are really focused on car velocity, which I think I can understand from your perspective; but ultimately don’t your customers care about a service delivery index, or am I just not understanding that correctly?

Well, I think we all agree that moving a car faster is good for both asset utilization and our customers, so that is really kind of a happy medium with solving all of those issues. We measure our local delivery processes, our in-transit processes as well, but ultimately if any of those break down, you’re going to see that car velocity, so that’s why we’re focusing on that. We have quite a bit of focus in general on serving our customers well, and Alan and I talk about that quite a bit and make sure we are aligned on that topic.

Yes, Cindy’s focus is on running a highly efficient, highly reliable and fluid network, and within our interactions with our customers, we have shared KPIs that are individual to those customers, not an index, so we’re having conversations every day with our customers that are metrics-based on the quality of the product that we’re delivering and the value we bring into the market.

It’s much more granular than SDI ever is.

Yes.

Appreciate it, thank you.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, our final question this morning comes from the line of Ken Hoexter with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.

Great, thanks for squeezing me in. Congrats on the solid job here. Cindy, a lot of information on PSR and the improvement. Where do you think you are on the path here in terms of when you step back, the hump, the flat switching? Is the major stuff done and now it’s the incremental improvements? Do you still see, when you look at this, the opportunity for capital investment? You mentioned some of the sidings. Is there any other projects that you look at, that still need to be implemented to get any more step function gains, or is this just kind of maybe incrementals? Then just a side question - any real estate gains in the quarter, or plans for the year?

Ken, I think that we still have some structural work that we need to do, whether that’s from a train size perspective or continuing to move forward with some terminal efficiencies beyond the footprint that we have today, but that’s going to depend on volume and where traffic wants to go. We want to make sure that we serve our customers well and we do it in an efficient, reliable way, so I think there’s still more structural work to be done and then we’ll, to your point, continue to tweak and refine from there. But I think I see a great opportunity ahead of us.

And Ken, let me answer your question on real estate. We had a pretty light quarter - we only had about $4 million of operating gains this year from the sale of real estate in the first quarter, and that was versus $11 million last Q1, so it was actually down $7 million year-over-year. Again, we’d tell you to guide--to bookmark around $30 million to $40 million over the course of the year, and we’d stick with that. There are years where we do have outsized specific items where when that happens, we’ll call it out and let you know, but for the time being I’d bookmark $30 million to $40 million for the year, even though we’re a little shy of that run rate here in the first quarter.

Thanks Cindy and Mark. Then my follow-up, Jim, you mentioned--I would love to ask about M&A in terms of the impact on the industry, but it doesn’t sound like you’re going to answer. But on the technology side, the autonomous track and car inspections, is there anything new that you’re working on as we prepare? Do you think going to one-man crews is the next step in this phase? You were asked about autonomous before. Just interested in--and you mentioned a lot of step-up in tech investments, it seems like an opportunity to keep making some strides, so maybe you can follow up on the tech side

Sure, happy to. Yes, I would say broadly that our focus when it comes to technology-led productivity and efficiency gains has been on the asset base, on the track structure in particular. We’ve put a lot of time and attention into automating, digitizing our track inspection protocols and accumulating that data and using it to more efficiently maintain our track. It’s a huge part of our asset base, so you can understand easily why we would start there. We have begun to extend out into other parts of what we do. We’re working on automating freight car inspections using machine vision systems. We are working hard on automating our crew room, reporting for duty, how we report out the conductors’ work in the yard and online of road - that gets automated, so many aspects of how we do our work in the field will be automated, put on a handheld. We’re leveraging the PTC network in a variety of ways as well, the communications network to think about automating train operations too. Next generation automated train operations presents a terrific opportunity for us to operate more efficiently and more safely, and so I’ll close on that note.

I want to thank everyone for your questions this morning, and we look forward to talking to you next quarter.

Take care, all.

Thank you. This concludes today’s conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.